Marine Engine/ Ship Propulsion System Simulation...Engine Parameters 0-D SIMULATION OF A LARGE...
Transcript of Marine Engine/ Ship Propulsion System Simulation...Engine Parameters 0-D SIMULATION OF A LARGE...
!Marine Engine/ Ship Propulsion
System Simulation !
Gerasimos Theotokatos !
Department of Naval Architecture, Ocean & Marine Engineering University of Strathclyde
!!!
November 2015
SIMULATION OF MARINE DIESEL ENGINE
Understanding of the physical processes !
Investigating the interaction between the subsystems!
Initial testing of alternative design options!
Examining circumstances with high risk in installation integrity
SIMULATION TOOLSTransfer function models!
! ! development of control schemes !
Mean value models!
! ! fast transient response estimation !
! ! engine control system design process!
Zero or One-Dimensional Models!
! ! more detailed modelling of engine components!
! ! performance prediction, transient response studies!
3-D models (FEM, CFD)!
! ! investigation, optimization of components design
MEAN VALUE MODELSAdvantages:!
Engine modelling with acceptable accuracy!Limited amount of input data !Reasonable time of execution!
Drawbacks:!Require data (experimental/simulation) for calibration!
Categories:!
Quasi-steady models (no mass accumulation is considered between the engine components)!
Modelling of engine receivers as open thermodynamic systems
MEAN VALUE ENGINE MODELLING (MVEM)
engine ambient
compressor
air cooler
exhaust receiver
NE
NTC
enginecylinders
to ambient via engine exhaust piping system
enginecrankshaft
turbine
scavengingreceiver
engine ambient
compressor
air cooler
exhaust receiver
NE
NTC
enginecylinders
to ambient via engine exhaust piping system
enginecrankshaft
turbine
scavengingreceiver
Modelled engine components
MVEM APROACH
/ in outdm dt m m= −! !
( ) ( )/ / /ht in in out out vdT dt Q m h m h udm dt mc= + − −! ! !
/p mRT V=
Engine scavenging and exhaust receivers are modelled as open thermodynamic systems
sh E PE
E sh P
Q QdNdt I I I
η −=
+ +TC T C
TC
dN Q Qdt I
−=
6 non-linear first order differential equations
Angular momentum conservation
MVEM IMPLEMENTED in MATLAB/SIMULINK
INP_
u
Ntc
INP_
d
OU
T_u
Qtu
rb
OU
T_d
turbine
time
Nen
gO
UT
propeller
OU
T_FF fixed
fluidexhaustambientO
UT_
FFfixedflluid
ambient
INP_
u
FR
Nen
g
INP_
d
OU
T_u
OU
T_sh
aft
OU
T_d
enginecylinders
engparTo Workspace
T2T1
Q_c
omp
Q_t
urb
N_t
c
T/Cshaft
NordNeng
pscavFR
PID governor
Sum
_in
Sum
_out
OU
T_u
OU
T_d
Open Thermo-dynamicSystem- exhaust receiver
Sum
_in
Sum
_out
OU
T
Open Thermo-dynamicSystem-scavengingreceiver
Nordschedule
INP_
eng
INP_
loadN
eng
Enginecrankshaft
INP_
u
Ntc
INP_
d
OU
T_u
Qco
mp
OU
T_d
compressor
Modular construction using Elements!Flow controllers (compressor, turbine, engine cylinders)!
Flow receivers (engine receivers)!
Mechanical elements (engine crankshaft, T/C shaft)!
Fixed fluid (ambient), Propeller, Engine governor, Nord schedule
MVEM modelling
12K98ME-‐C engine
2-s marine engine slow steaming operation
Blower activation vs. T/C cut-‐out
SIMULATION RESULTS
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
time (s)
rack
pos
ition
(-) referencemodel 1model 2
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 10060
70
80
90
100
time (s)
engi
ne s
peed
(rpm
)
referencemodel 1model 2
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1002000
3000
4000
5000
time (s)
engi
ne to
rque
(kN
m)
referencemodel 1model 2
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1006000
8000
10000
12000
time (s)T/
C s
peed
(rpm
) referencemodel 1model 2
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1001
2
3
4
time (s)scav
. rec
eive
r pre
ssur
e (b
ar)
referencemodel 1model 2
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100400
600
800
1000
time (s)exh.
rece
iver
tem
pera
ture
(K)
referencemodel 1model 2
Comparison of the two modelling approaches results for a fast engine transient run of 100 s
- ordered speed changes 94 rpm ⇨ 69 rpm ⇨ 94 rpm
SIMULATION RESULTS
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 50070
75
80
85
90
95
100
time (s)
engi
ne s
peed
(rpm
)
model 1model 2
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 5008000
8500
9000
9500
10000
10500
11000
11500
time (s)
T/C
spe
ed (r
pm)
model 1model 2
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 5001.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
time (s)
scav
. rec
eive
r pre
ssur
e (b
ar) model 1
model 2
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500500
550
600
650
700
750
800
time (s)
exh.
rece
iver
tem
pera
ture
(K) model 1
model 2
Comparison of two modelling approaches results for a slow engine transient of 500 s!
ordered speed changes: 94 rpm ⇨ 69 rpm ⇨ 94 rpm
0-D ENGINE SIMULATION
• Thermodynamic / Control Volume Type!
• Basic Engineering Elements!– Flow Receivers ( cylinders, plenums )!– Flow Controllers (valves, heat exchangers, compressors,
turbines )!– Mechanical Elements (crankshaft, shafts, loads)
Heat Transfer
TurbochargerIntercooler
GovernorElectronic PIDGas Exchange
Fuel Injection
Combustion
Friction Engine/propeller Dynamics
Propeller TorqueDemand
Scavenging
Heat Transfer
TurbochargerIntercooler
GovernorElectronic PIDGas Exchange
Fuel Injection
Combustion
Friction Engine/propeller Dynamics
Propeller TorqueDemand
Scavenging
0-D ENGINE SIMULATION in MATLAB/Simulink
Engine Parameters
0-D SIMULATION OF A LARGE TWO-STROKE DIESEL ENGINE
Bore 900 mmStroke 2550 mmNumber of cylinders 9Brake Power (MCR) 41130 kWEngine speed (MCR) 94 rpmbmep (MCR) 18 barbsfc (L1) 173 g/kWhTurbocharger units 3 ABB 714
MAN B&W 9K90MC ENGINE SIMULATION
TURB. 3
COMP. 3
CYLINDERS
INLETPORTS
EXHAUSTVALVES
EX.GAS
91 2 3 4 5
SCAVENGING RECEIVER
EXHAUST RECEIVER
1 32 4 5
54321
6
6
6
7
7
7
8
8
8
9
9
AIR
TURBOSHAFT 1
TURBOSHAFT 2
TURBOSHAFT 3
TURB. 2TURB. 1
COMP. 2COMP. 1
AIRAIR
EX.GASEX.GAS
AIRCOOLER 3
AIRCOOLER 2
AIRCOOLER 1
Cylinders No. : 9 Bore : 900 mm Stroke : 2550 mm Compr. Ratio : 16.8 Turbochargers : 3 ABB VTR-714
Speed @ MCR : 94 rpm Brake Power @ MCR : 41200 kW (56000 BHP) BMEP @ MCR : 18 bar Boost pressure @ MCR : 3.6 bar
SIMULATION RESULTS vs. MEASURED DATAEngine: MAN B&W 9K90MC Ship: Containership / Length 280 m / 4600 TEU Operation: at MCR speed
0-D ENGINE SIMULATION - Results
7K98MC engine
0-D ENGINE SIMULATION - Results
7K98MC engine