Marina Abramović sued by former lover andcollaborator UlayA lawsuit has been launched against the world’s best-known performance artist, which claims she is inviolation of a contract over their joint works. Abramović vehemently denies the claim

Esther Addley and Noah Charney

Wednesday 11 November 2015 18.21 GMT

Marina Abramović, the world’s best-known performance artist, is being sued by her formercollaborator and romantic partner, the German artist known as Ulay, in a dispute overworks they created jointly.

Belgrade-born Abramović and Ulay, real name Frank Uwe Laysiepen, were lovers and co-creators for more than a decade before their separation in 1988, during which time theydevised a series of works exploring their partnership.

Their relationship came to prominence in 2010, during an installation at MoMA in NewYork in which Abramović sat in a chair in a gallery for eight hours a day and invitedstrangers to sit opposite her and look into her eyes. When Ulay unexpectedly took a seat,she began to cry and reached across to hold his hands; the video of the encounter has beenviewed by millions on YouTube.

The memory of that tender moment has now been banished, however, after Ulay launcheda lawsuit, to be heard in Amsterdam later this month, in which he claims Abramović hasviolated a contract they signed in 1999 covering works they had created together.

Ulay claims that Abramović has asked galleries to list her as the sole author of their jointworks, contrary to the terms of the contract, has failed to provide him with accuratestatements of sales, and has paid him only four times in the course of 16 years.

“She is not just a former business partner,” he told the Guardian. “The whole oeuvre hasmade history. It’s now in school books. But she has deliberately misinterpreted things, orleft my name out.”

But Abramovic’s lawyer said the artist “totally disagrees” with her former partner’sallegations. “My client doesn’t want to comment on them, they are libellous. My clientconsiders that this lawsuit is abusive and aimed to damage her reputation in public, whichis proven by his allegations to you. My client is very confident in her position in front of thecourt. She will defend her rights and reputation by all legal means.”

Become a Guardian Member and support independent journalism

George Monbiot

Become a supporter from just £5 per month to ensure qualityjournalism is available to all.

Find out more

More news

TopicsMarina Abramovic

Save for later Article savedReuse this content

When the couple separated in 1988, they decided to mark the end of their relationship witha piece called The Lovers, in which they each walked 2,500km from either end of the GreatWall of China, before embracing and parting for the last time.

Ulay says he later sold his physical archive to Abramović, who agreed to maintain it andsupervise the production of saleable materials from it, in the form of videos, photographsand performances. All profits were to be divided as follows: 50% to the gallery, 30% toAbramović and 20% to Ulay.

But his lawsuit claims that she has interpreted the contract to give him a much smallershare of royalties. In addition, Ulay alleges that Abramović prevented him from includingimages of their joint works in his 2014 book, Whispers: Ulay on Ulay – resulting in multipleredactions that were replaced in its pages with pale pink squares – and objected to theestablishment of the Ulay Foundation, an organisation intended to manage hisposthumous estate.

The case will be heard at Amsterdam district court later this month.