Marie-Ange Kalenga - PWYP Montreal Conference 2009
Click here to load reader
-
Upload
publish-what-you-pay -
Category
Documents
-
view
507 -
download
3
description
Transcript of Marie-Ange Kalenga - PWYP Montreal Conference 2009
Africa
Setting upPWYP Coalitions in Africa
Best Practices
****Mise en place de Coalitions PCQVP
en AfriqueMeilleures Pratiques
Afrique
Overview
1. Introduction
2. Coalition approach: Why? Where? How?
3. Key steps to follow
4. Success and Challenges
5. Questions for group discussion
� Launched in 2004
� Now more than 100 members in about 30 countries/19 affiliated national coalitions
� Members sign up to general appeal and agree to broad membership principles
� Work as coalition – both nationally and regionally– to pool together collective strengths, resources, contacts and common objectives under one umbrella
� PWYP is a campaign, not an organization
� Regional governance structure: national coalitions, regional coordinator supervised by a management committee, multiyear action plan, regular regional and subregional strategy meetings - emphasis on development of national civil society coalitions to ensure local ownership and independence
Key Facts about PWYP
Africa
Objectives of PWYP
Overall Objective of Coalition Approach
Mobilize local civil society groups for transparent and accountable management of natural resources for
sustainable economic and social development
Benefits of working in a
national coalition
l Mutual learning
l Sharing of information and capacities
l Specialization and
participation according
to interest and capacity
� Campaign rooted in local
context
� Internalization of conflict resolution and
minimization of divisions
� Work in a collective
ultimately increases
effectiveness, inclusiveness and voice
PWYP Coalitions Worldwide
America
Europe Africa
Central Asia
South-East Asia / Aus
PWYPInternational
AzerbaijanKazakhstanKyrgyz RepublicGeorgia
FranceGermanyNetherlandsNorwayUnited Kingdom
United StatesCanada
IndonesiaAustralia
Chad, CameroonCongo BrazzavilleDR Congo, GhanaLiberia, MauritaniaNigeria, Sierra Leone, NigerGuinea, Guinea Bissau, Côte d’Ivoire, Mali, Mozambique, Burkina Faso, Zambia, Uganda, Gabon
Role
• ADVOCACY
• NETWORKING
• RESEARCH AND INFORMATION DISSEMINATION
•CAPACITY-BUILDING
Chronology
✦2003: PCQVP Congo Brazzaville✦2004: PWYP Nigeria, PCQVP/PCQVG Tchad,✦2006: Sierra Leone, Cameroon ✦2006: PCQVP RDC, PWYP Ghana, ROTAB Niger,
PWYP Liberia, PCQVP Guinée Conakry, PCQVP Mauritanie✦2008: PCQVP Mali, PCQVP Burkina Faso, PWYP
Mozambique, PWYP Uganda ✦2009: PWYP Zambia
National coalitions: the basis for action• National coalitions are autonomous, independent and broad base platforms that
ensure local ownership and local context are taken into account in campaign objectives
• National coalitions need to uphold to PWYP membership principles
• Each has own unique structure, organisation, leadership, action plan
• Act as an ADVOCATE, PARTNER with government, WATCHDOG over government
• Some focus on squarely on EITI monitoring, others on broader PWYP objectives, others on broad public finance transparency and management issues
• Work on joint international advocacy activities (EITI, IFIs) facilitated by regional/international PWYP Coordinators
• Work closely with INGO partners to facilitate capacity building efforts and support advocacy activities of coalitions and members. Member INGOs play a key support role for local coalitions, limited capacity of PWYP staff (4 people)
Useful steps to follow
IDENTIFY & MOBILISE
RELEVANT COS ACTORS
lAvoid duplicating structures
lMap and sensitize local CSO
groups and networks
lOrganise broad
consultation/planning meeting
lSeek support from International
and regional coordinations/Get
advice from more advanced
coalitions
DEFINE STRUCTURE AND GOVERNANCE MECHANISMS
-Avoid creating heavy and bureaucratic structures and think about institutional sustainability
-Agree on rules and working procedures that will guide collaboration and interaction between members (membership criteria, decision making process, internal and external communications, financial management, conflict resolution)
-Establish protection mechanisms for security of campaigners
Variety of structures- PWYP values independence and autonomy of action
- Local groups are free to choose a model that fits their needs and context
- Best practices can be shared (PWYP guide on coalition building)
National Coalitions - A unique
space for collaboration
DEFINE PRIORITIES & CLEAR OBJECTIVES
-Develop a realistic action plan
-Activities need to bring value added and shouldn’t be a burden for members
-Regular evaluation of activities
FUNDING
- International funding: Osiwa, RWI,
Swissaid, CRS, Cafod, Oxfam, IFIs,
bilaterals
- National funding: Diplomatic missions, local
NGOs, members
- Sustainable fundraising strategy
Expected Results
Sharing of experience and expertise to strengthen members
Establishment of a functional national coalition
Being efficient and effective in implementing national action plan
Secure financial means for implementing national action plan
Success & Challenges � Financial constraints
� Capacity-building
� Security issues
� Misconduct of national coalitions have negative repercussions on the PWYP label (internal conflicts, internal transparency and accountability standards)
� Diversity of the campaign at regional and international level
� PWYP members in 25 resource-rich African and 19 established national coalitions
� PWYP members are monitoring EITI in each of the 21 implementing countries across Africa
� NEITI Bill in Nigeria, LEITI Bill introduced in Liberia
� Support and input to contract review processes in DRC, Liberia, Sierra Leone
� Research and advocacy efforts to include budget work
� Broad based donor/INGO support for PWYP coalitions
� Mentoring, joined-up advocacy efforts and cross-fertilization across platforms (4 regional meetings and 3 subregional summits to date)
Key questions for group discussion
� What are the key ingredients for an effective network approach and how does PWYP expand to include new countries with restricted CS? Any other models?
� How do we ensure an inclusive approach that engages with all relevant actors to avoid reactive engagement and stay ahead at country level?
� Do we need to update coalition membership principles to ensure that national coalitions approve clear conflict resolution and transparency (Practice What You
Preach) norms and procedures?
15
THANK YOU!
MERCI!
Marie-Ange Kalenga:
www.publishwhatyoupay.org
15