Marcia S. Wagner, Esq. Washington Update: New DOL and Governmental Initiatives.
-
Upload
silas-harrington -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Marcia S. Wagner, Esq. Washington Update: New DOL and Governmental Initiatives.
Marcia S. Wagner, Esq.
Washington Update:New DOL and
Governmental Initiatives
Introduction – Transformative Changes
Accelerating Pace of Regulatory Change◦Participant investment advice rule◦Plan-level fee disclosures◦Participant-level investment disclosures
Proposals from Lifetime Income Project◦ Lifetime income illustrations◦ Longevity annuities
Watershed: DOL fiduciary proposal◦New fiduciaries◦Stricter compliance◦Rollovers become a fiduciary act
2
Agenda
1. Fiduciary Proposal2. Rollovers3. Tax Reform4. Regulatory Initiatives
3
Background for DOL Proposal
Evolution of Retirement Marketplace◦Existing “fiduciary” definition was issued in 1975◦Many financial advisors (including brokers) are
not fiduciaries under existing definition
DOL’s Initial Proposal (2010)◦Withdrawn amidst controversy◦DOL releases new proposal on April 20, 2015
4
Existing ERISA Definition
Fiduciary Status◦Person who provides “investment advice” relating
to plan assets for compensation◦Not a fiduciary if no investment advice is given
5-Prong Definition for “Investment Advice”◦Making investment recommendations◦On regular basis◦Mutual understanding◦Primary basis for plan’s decisions◦ Individualized to plan’s needs
5
Proposed Fiduciary Definition
Fiduciary Status◦Person who provides “investment advice” for
compensation to plans, plan fiduciaries, participants, IRAs and IRA owners
4-Prong Definition for “Investment Advice”◦Making covered recommendations◦Understanding (does not need to be mutual)◦ Individualized or specifically directed to recipient◦ For consideration by recipient (need not be
primary basis)
6
Scope of Investment Advice
Covered Recommendations◦ Investment recommendations, including
taking/investing rollovers◦ Investment management recommendations,
including management of rollover assets◦Giving appraisal or fairness opinion◦Recommending person who provides any of
above services for compensation
7
Acknowledging Fiduciary Status
Deemed “Investment Advice”◦Advisor makes covered recommendations◦Represents or acknowledges that it is a fiduciary
with respect to advice◦No written acknowledgement is required◦ Fiduciary status applies automatically, even if
proposed 4-prong definition is not met
8
Observations on Proposed Definition
Proposed Changes to “Investment Advice”◦ Includes one-time advice (without “regular basis”
condition)◦No need for "mutual understanding” of parties◦Advice merely needs to be specifically directed to
recipient (and does not need to be individualized)◦Recipient merely needs to consider advice when
making decision (even if not “primary basis”)◦Expressly revises definition to cover investment
management recommendations
9
Carve-Out for Investment Education
Similar to Current Safe Harbor (IB 96-1)◦Plan Information◦General Financial/Retirement Information◦Asset Allocation Models◦ Interactive Investment Materials
Observations◦Carve-out applies to both plan and IRA clients◦Expanded to include retirement income guidance◦Education must not refer to specific investment
products◦Asset allocation models and interactive materials
cannot reference plan’s investment alternatives10
Proposed Exemption
Need for “ERISA 406(b)” Exemptive Relief◦Proposed “investment advice” definition confers
fiduciary status on all types of advisors◦Prohibited transaction rules ban advisors from
earning variable compensation (commissions)◦Exemption required for brokers and insurance
agents, including advisors to IRAs◦DOL proposed Best Interest Contract Exemption
11
Best Interest Contract Exemption (BICE)
Retail Scope of Proposed Exemption◦Permits fiduciary advisor to earn variable
compensation (commissions) for services to: Participants IRA owners Sponsors of small, non-participant-directed plans
(less than 100 participants)
Observations◦No exemptive relief for small, participant-directed
plans (DOL requesting comments)◦No exemptive relief for large plan sponsors
(participant-directed or otherwise)
12
Products Covered by BICE
Covered Products◦Bank deposits and CDs◦Mutual funds, ETFs, CIFs and insurance
company separate accounts◦Exchange-traded REITs◦Corporate bonds (registered offering) and equity
securities (exchange-traded)◦ Treasury and agency debt securities◦ Insurance/annuity contracts and GICs
Observations◦No exemptive relief for privately placed debt,
non-traded REITs and alternative investments13
BICE’s Required Contract
Mandatory Terms for Written Contract◦Must state that advisor is fiduciary for
ERISA/Code purposes with respect to advice◦ Impartial Conduct Standard
Advice is in “best interest” of client Reasonable compensation No misleading statements
◦Warranties Compliance with law Policies reasonably designed to mitigate conflicts No incentives to provide improper advice
◦No Liability Limit for Contract Violations Arbitration permitted (with class action rights)
14
BICE Disclosures
Disclosures in Written Contract◦Must identify conflicts◦Client’s right to obtain complete fee information◦Whether advisor offers proprietary products or
receives third party payments◦Address of webpage disclosing compensation
Transaction Disclosures◦Upfront chart with cost of investing for 1-, 5- and
10-year periods (model chart may be used)◦Annual disclosures of investment and fee activity
Webpage disclosure of compensation
15
Observations on BICE
Regulatory Jurisdiction◦DOL lacks enforcement authority over IRAs◦Required contract gives enforcement authority to
clients◦Violation of Impartial Conduct Standard will
breach contract (but not BIC Exemption)
Impact on Brokers and Insurance Agents◦Will regulate advisors without plan clients (having
only personal IRA clients)◦May be difficult for firms to eliminate incentives
that encourage improper advice
16
Timeline for Rulemaking
Initial 75-Day Comment Period◦Proposal released April 20, 2015◦ Initial comment period ended July 21st
Public Hearing◦August 10th – 13th◦ Final comment period after transcripts released
Delayed Applicability Date for Final Rule◦ Final rule effective 60 days after publication◦Requirements of final rule generally not
applicable until 8 months after publication◦Obama Administration’s second terms ends in
January 201717
Concluding Comments: DOL Proposal
Moving to Universal Fiduciary Standard◦DOL is seeking to impose “best interest” fiduciary
standard on all types of advisors to plans/IRAs◦Proposal leverages off of existing “principles-
based” regulatory approach for RIAs
Expected Impact on Advisors◦DOL proposal will affect most advisors because
of reach to IRA assets◦Costly for broker-dealers and insurance agencies ◦ Little or no impact on RIAs, but certain advisors
may decide to join or become RIAs
18
Recommendation
Next Steps and Following up◦Be sure to stay abreast of rulemaking process
and consult ERISA counsel as appropriate◦Advisors may wish to re-examine their client
service models and documentation ◦Expect plan sponsors to request confirmation of
fiduciary status of advisors, and whether DOL proposal will impact services or fees
19
TOC
1. Fiduciary Proposal2. Rollovers3. Tax Reform4. Regulatory Initiatives
20
Agenda
Potential Abuses of Cross-Selling
Issues arising from cross-selling◦Potential conflicts of interest◦Exploiting trust to sell at unfavorable terms
Capturing rollover assets◦Advisor develops relationships with plan sponsor
and participants◦Potential conflict if advisor’s fees on rollover
assets are higher than fees on plan assets
21
DOL Guidance
Potential for abuse◦DOL policy concern ◦DOL interpretive guidance for cross-selling of
rollover IRA services◦Starting point: ERISA prohibition against self-
dealing◦Advisor cannot provide fiduciary advice
increasing its compensation
Example◦Advisor’s fiduciary advice steers participants to
fund with highest 12b-1 fee◦Advice is tainted even if provided in good faith
22
DOL Rollover Opinion
Advisory Opinion 2005-23A◦Broadly suggests that if an advisor is fiduciary,
any rollover advice to participants may trigger PT◦DOL does not fully explain reasoning◦ If Advisor is not fiduciary, rollover advice will not
trigger PT
23
Consequences of DOL Rollover Opinion
Advisors appointed as fiduciaries◦ Fiduciary advisor accepting fiduciary status
generally cannot capture rollover assets
Other advisors◦ If advisor provides “accidental” fiduciary advice,
this advisor becomes a fiduciary◦Advisors accidentally becoming a fiduciary are
subject to restrictions of Rollover Opinion
Proposed definition of fiduciary advice includes rollover recommendations
24
Effect of Fiduciary Proposal on Rollover Opinion
Impact on Advisory Opinion 2005-23A◦ If adopted, DOL fiduciary proposal would replace
this Advisory Opinion guidance◦As proposed, any rollover advice would be
fiduciary advice◦Non-fiduciary advisors providing rollover advice
would automatically become plan/IRA fiduciaries
Relief under Proposed Exemption (BICE)◦Advisors would be able to provide rollover advice
and earn higher compensation on rollover assets◦Proposed exemption entails numerous
requirements25
Protective Measures
BICE Relief for IRA Rollovers◦Necessary for advisors earning variable
commission-based compensation◦Also necessary for fee-based advisors if higher
compensation is earned after rollover
Written Contract Requirement◦Best interest standard◦Policy mitigating effects of differential compensation
Disclosures◦Upfront disclosure of projected investment costs◦Annual disclosure of investment and fee activity◦Webpage disclosures on compensation
26
Further Protective Measures
Competitive Pricing Information◦Gather pricing data to demonstrate that pricing
for similar clients is competitive
Limiting Scope of Advice◦Draft plan client’s agreement to reduce
parameters of advice ◦Example: Only actively managed mutual funds
will be recommended◦Only funds with 12b-1 fees from 25 to 50 bps will
be considered
27
FINRA Regulatory Notice 13-45
Rollover recommendations must be suitable
Factors to be considered by advisor◦ Investment options◦ Fees and expenses◦Services◦Withdrawal penalties◦Creditor protection◦Application of RMD rules
Written Policies ◦Must mitigate conflicts◦ Training for reps◦Policies will need to be revised to comply with
DOL fiduciary proposal and BICE28
TOC
1. Fiduciary Proposal2. Rollovers3. Tax Reform4. Regulatory Initiatives
29
Agenda
Administration Push to Increase Access through IRAs
Administration pushing automatic IRAs:◦Mandatory for employers with 10 employees but
no retirement plan◦ 3% default contribution rate◦Choice of traditional pre-tax IRA or after-tax Roth◦Employees allowed to opt out◦Multiple alternatives for selecting IRA provider◦Government designated default investments
30
myRA Initiative
myRA Starter IRAs◦Starter program does not require legislative
authorization◦Contributions to Roth accounts◦Permits small investments ($25 / $5)◦ Low rate of return from Treasury bonds◦Maximum $15,000 balance
31
How Retirement Plans Affect the Deficit
Impact of retirement plans on federal deficit◦DC / 401(k)
$61 billion (2015) $414 billion (2015 – 2019)
◦DB $42 billion (2015) $235 billion (2015 – 2019)
32
Affect of Limiting Contributions 2015 Plan limitations that can be reduced to
limit deficit:◦Annual additions from all sources - $53,000◦Elective deferrals - $18,000◦Plan sponsor deduction - 25% participant
compensation◦Compensation limit to determine
benefits/contributions - $265,000
Limits proposed by Tax Reform Act of 2014◦ Freezes DC limits until 2024◦ $63.4 billion revenue gain over 10 years◦Additional $144 billion from treating half of 401(k)
deferrals as Roth33
General Limits on Exclusions and Deductions
Obama FY 2016 proposed $3.4 million cap on aggregate lifetime contributions◦Cap to vary based on age◦Double tax if prohibited amount not withdrawn
Obama proposal limiting tax deductions for plan contributions◦ 11.6% tax on employer & employee plan
contributions◦ For high earners only◦Basis adjustment for extra tax
34
USA Retirement Funds Proposal
USA Retirement Funds proposed by Sen. Tom Harkin
Plan features:◦ Automatic/universal enrollment required by employers
with no plan◦ Regular stream of income starting at retirement age◦ No lump sum withdrawals◦ Financed by employee payroll contributions &
government credits◦ Privately managed investment by new entities: USA
Retirement Funds◦ Limited employer involvement; no fiduciary
responsibility◦ Unspecified level of required employer contributions◦ Employees can raise/lower contributions or opt out
35
State Proposals
State-managed plans for private-sector workers◦ Intended to expand access to retirement saving◦States would mange investments◦DOL directed to clarify preemption issue by end
of 2015
California Secure Choice◦Mandatory auto-IRA◦Pooled investments managed by state and
guaranteed returns
36
NCPERS Proposal
NCPERS Proposal◦Private-sector workers to be covered by plan
established by state government◦State managed investment and guaranteed
returns◦ Lifetime benefits◦Employer and employee contributions◦Questions as to sufficiency of funding
(backstopped by taxpayers)
37
Summing Up Legislative ProposalsSignificant Transformation of Private
Retirement System Possible
Tax Reform◦Reducing tax incentives will shrink system◦ Lower contributions at all income levels result if
tax exclusions cut back
Obama proposal for general limit on benefit from tax exclusions◦Does not focus directly on 401(k) contributions◦Provides political cover◦Same effect on contributions as direct cutback on
excludible amount38
Summing Up Legislative Proposals (cont’d)
Advocacy for Centralization◦Mandated benefits◦Guaranteed benefits and/or investment results◦Creation of new interest groups ◦Government influence over investments could
drive firms out of retirement industry
State-Sponsored Initiatives◦State-level programs may cause breakdown in
uniformity of pension laws◦ Inflection point regarding the types of retirement
schemes nation wants 39
TOC
1. Fiduciary Proposal2. Rollovers3. Tax Reform4. Regulatory Initiatives
40
Agenda
Goals of Lifetime Income Initiatives
Help retirees take plan distributions without outliving them◦Motivate retirees to annuitize accounts◦Retirement paycheck for life
Encourage plan sponsors to voluntarily offer annuity options◦Permit longevity annuities◦Remove regulatory hurdles◦ Facilitate default annuities◦Promote education and disclosures
41
Current Fiduciary Standard for Selecting Annuities
Selection of Annuity Provider and Annuities◦Subject to ERISA fiduciary standards
Safe harbor: DC Plan Distribution Annuities
◦Procedural prudence ◦ Insurer’s ability to pay◦Cost ◦Draw appropriate conclusions◦Seek expert advice
2015 guidance ◦ Limits period for monitoring and statute of
limitations42
Promoting Longevity Annuities
New IRS regulation relaxes required minimum distribution rules◦RMD rules mandate start at age 70 ½ but
longevity annuities provide income stream for later in life
◦ Final Regulation provides:◦RMD exception for investment in QLAC◦ Investment in QLAC capped at $125,000 or 25%
of account◦QLAC payments to start no later than age 85◦Applies to annuity purchases on/after July 2,
201443
DOL Proposal for Lifetime Income Disclosures
Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking◦ Lifetime income illustration in participant
statements ◦Must provide estimated income streams based on:
(1) current account, and
(2) projected account at NRA
Safe Harbor for Projected Account◦Assume 7% investment return◦Assume current contribution level, with 3%
increase◦Use 3% discount rate to convert to current dollars
44
In Conclusion:
Issues driving change◦Asset preservation◦Mitigating longevity risk◦Access to system
Simplify proposed changes
Avoid changes that downsize system
Address systemic issues with incentives, not mandates
45
Marcia S. Wagner, Esq.
99 Summer Street, 13th FloorBoston, MA 02110(617) 357-5200
Washington Update:New DOL and
Governmental Initiatives
A0174111