Marcelino Segundo-Sanchez, A200 248 313 (BIA Dec. 29, 2014)

8/10/2019 Marcelino Segundo-Sanchez, A200 248 313 (BIA Dec. 29, 2014)

1/12

Jae, Arnold S. Esq.Aorney at law330 East Carrillo StreetSanta Babaa CA 93101-1411

Executive Oce r Immgaon Reew

ard Immigratin AppealsOce the erk

107 bug k, u 2000 Chc Vg 2030

OHS/ICE ice of Chef Counsel - LS606 S lve Street 8t FloorLos Angeles CA 9014

Name: SEGUND SACHEZ MARCEL .. A 200-248-313

Date of ths notice: 12/29/2014

Enclosed s a copy of he Board's decso an oder n e above-rereced case.

Ecosre

Pl Mb:Adkins-Blanch, Chares KGuendesberger. JohHofma Sharo

Sncere,

D cDona CarrCe ek

Docket

For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished

Cite as: Marcelino Segundo-Sanchez, A200 248 313 (BIA Dec. 29, 2014)


2/12

US Depament of JustceExecutive Oce r Imiation Reiew

Decso of the Bord of maon Appels

Fas Chuch, Vigii 053

File: A200 248 313 Los Angeles, CA Dte DEC 2 9 014

In re: MARCELIO SEGUDOSAHEZ .k.a. Mceino Schez

REMOVL PROEDINGS

APPEAL

ON BALF OF SPONDE old S. Je, Esue

APPLICTION onnue; vuntary depe

Te responen, ative d itize of Mexio, has peae e Iigrtion Jue's

deision dated 31, 2013, denying his motion r cntinuce d is plicaton rvolntary depe. e appe wil be disisse in p an sustined in p

The Bo reviews Iigtion ue's nins of t, ing nins as o ecredibily of testiony, under learly eroneous std. Se 8 CF. 1003(d)(3)(i). heBo revews questins of w, discretin, d uen, al other issues rse in Imgrion Judges decsin de nv. Se 8 C.FR. 1003(d)(3)(ii)

As n ii er, we nd no merit in te respondents ent at he ImmigrtionJde deprived hi of the priviege f consel in tese proceedings because he did not t erespondent er onnue to retain the consel The respondent a ready been te

coninnce of proxtely 3 onhs to retin cosel (r. 9, 12-13). We e ssedtt e resondent was orde resonble d realisi eid of ie o seek, se w,d retain counsel of his hoice, therere fled to deonste god cause to her delayte proeedins See Mater of-B, 25 I & N Dec 888 {BIA 2012) aer oPrezAndrade,19 &N Dec 433 BI 1987) (te decsion to rant or deny ontiunce r ood use iswiin the soud disretion of e Imigration dge d wll not be veed on ape nessit is son tht he respondent was enied ll d ir hering); 8 CF.R 1003.29 240.6.

e resondents c t he was eprive of opportniy o py r "prosecutoiiscretion is so witout merit d provides no bsis r reversing te Imiation dges

deision. The discreton to eer tion on te resondent's reov lies wit e Deent fHeld Seuriy. The respondent can ursue at relief t y tie indepenent of es

preeins, ntil such time s he is tay emove o he United Stes

We see wih e Iigrin Jdges onlusion t the resonden d noensate e ets volunty dere in e exercise of disreion. While we e heesponents adssion of a relivey reent est in 201 r drivin ner e ne thyoung chilen resent in is vehice very seiosly, we conlude t he resonents positiveequites oweig e negaive s note by e Imiton ude, e resondent lives in ily t in which he serves er-gre o young chie, he is ainlly empoye, dhe hs h a lon perod of residence in e Unied States In blcin ese positive euities



3/12

00 248

against te negave, we nd tat te espondent merits volnar depue in e execise ofdsretion, d we wil im at limited of reef under or de novo revew authoity.

ccodngy, e lowing ordes wil be entered

ORDER: Te respondents appea is dismissed in p and sustained n par.

FURTHER OER Pursuant to e mmation Judges orer d condtioned uponcompce wi contons set r by the mmaion Jdge d e statute, e responden is

permited to volunarily depa the Unied States, iot expense to te Goveent, wiin 60days om e date of tis order or y extenson beyond tat tme as may be gante b teDepent of Homeland Seurity (DHS) See secion 240B(b) of te Immgration d

atonai t, 8 USC. 1229(b) see also 8 C.F.R 124026(c), ( n the event erespondent ils o vountiy depa e United Saes, he espondent sha be removed as

provided in te mmigration Jdges ode.

OTCE f e respondent fails to vountiy depa te United States win e mepeiod speced, or any extensons grted by e DHS, e respondent sa be subjet o a civilpenat as provided by the regulations nd e satte and sha be inegbe r a period of 10years r y her elief unde seion 20B and secons 240A, 245, 28, nd 24 of e ctSee section 240B( d) o f te t.

WG f e respondent les a motion to reopen or econsider pior to e expiration ofthe vot deparre peiod set r above, e gant of voun depue s atomaicallytenated; te period alowed r voay depe s not sayed, toe, or extended. If thegrant of volunta depae is automaticaly teated upon the lng of a motion, te penaltiesr failure to depa under seton 240B(d) of the ct shl not appy. See 8 C.FR. 1240.26(e)()

WAG: pro to deping e United Sates, he espondent les any judiciachalenge to is admnisatvey nal orde, such as a petiton r revew pursunt to secion242 of e ct, 8 U.SC. 1252, e grant of volna depae is auomaticly teinated, d

te alteate order of removal sal iediaey take eect. However, if he respondent es apeition eview and en depas the nied States in 0 days of sch ling, therespondent wl not be deemed to ave depaed nder an oder of removal f the aen providesto e DHS sh evdence of is or her depe ta he Immigation and Csoms EnforcementFeld Oe Drecor of te DHS may require and povies evdence DHS deems suen ahe or se has emned otside of e United Sates e penalies r ilre to dep derseon 240B(d) of e t sal not appy o an alen who es a petton r eview,notwisnding y peod of time at e o she emains in te Unite Sates wie the petitionr eview is pending. ee .R. 0.6i).



4/12

UNITED SATE DEPARTMENT OF USTICEEXECUTIVE O'ICE OR IIGRTION REVIEW

UNED SATE IMMIAION COURLOS ANGELES, CALIORNIA

ile A200-4B-313

In the Maer of

MARCELINO SEGUNDA SANCHEZ

REPONDE

CHARGE: INA Secon 2(a) (6) (A i.

January 3 203

IN REMOAL PROCEEDINS

APPLIATIONS Posearng volunar depae pursuan o INASecon 0).

ON EHAL O REPONDET PRO E

ON EHAL O HS IRIN OENHALERG

OAL DECIION O TE IMIRAION UDE

e responden s a 24earold nave and czen of

exico e s prse n e Uned Saes wio aving been

admed or paroed See Eib

Reoal proceedngs ere coenced e lng on

ebrar 6 0 o a Noce o Appear daed Ocober 20

A a aser calendar eang on oveer B 20 e


5/12

espondent appeaed po se At that time, he Cout explained

he natue and pupose of he poceedings to the espondent

Addiionally, e Cot explained the espoen's igts to

him. The Cou expained o he esponden his ight o pesent

evidence a obec o evience pesene by e Depamen of

Hoea Secuity, his ight o question witnesses, his ight o

appeal fom an y decision of he Imigation ge, and his ighto hae an atone at his own expense The esponden as

poide wi h a ising of aoneys who ma be illing o

assis him at educe expense o fo fee along wih anings

egaing he se of noaios

The Co poied he esponden with a heah

aounent peiod onetheess, alost hee monhs afe he

initia heaing ate he espondent appeaed again withot an

aoney Wih he assistance of a cout inepee, the out

began o undetae o quesion the appicant o etemne

whethe he popey was emovabe an whehe he ight be

eligible fo elief o poection fom eoal.

The espondent tesiied that he enteed he United

Staes withou inspection He testified that he was bon in

Mexico His paents wee bo in exico His ganpaents ee

bon in Mexco Neihe of his paens no an of his

gandpaents eve became citizens of the Unied States The

espondent atests that he is a citien of Mexico not a ciien

of the United States of Ameica The Cot inds that the

A20024 8-33 2 Januay 3 203


6/12

respondens sorn esimony s sucien o presen cer

convincing nd unequivoc evidence o ienge

Aienge ving been esbished e burden of roof

s upon he responden o demonsre his ime pce nd

mer of enry nd o esbish e is no indmissibe s

crged n is cse e resonden conceded he enered

e Unied Ses iou inspecion by foo in or bou rc

23 e esified he did no encouner igrion

officers h ime e esified no migrion

officer ved hm roug or oherise permied him enry no

he Unied Ses Under he circumsnces e Cour finds e

responden hs fied o sisfy his urden of roving he

s no indmissibe ursun o A Secion 2() 6 {A i)

chrge of indissibiiy erefore is susined.

e responden designed exico s e counry for

remov shoud remov become necessry. The Cour direcs h

Mexico he counry of e responde's ciiensip s he

pproprie counry for remov in is cse

Consisen i is suory reguory nd ehc

obigions e Cour hen quesioned he responden o

deermine eher e my be eigibe for some for of reef or

proecion e Cour s unbe o oce ny fom of reief

or proecion e responden my be eigibe for excep forvounry deprure

e responden esfied h e enered e Uned Ses

A2-24 833 3 nury 3 23

( o d OS


7/12

in Mar 23 e as sered i e Noie o Aear in

Oober 211 See Ei As su, e does no aear o

ae suffiien ie for aneaion of reoa e Cour

noes, in any een, a e resonden faied o disose any

uaifyin eaie for is urose

The eidene aso faied o disose any reuisie for

e resonden o adjus is saus Nobody aears o ae

fied any aerork on beaf of e resonden by i he

ih reuarie is saus

e resonden does no aear o ae been a ii

of ioen rie ere in e Unied Saes e +has no

roided esiony agains any riina eeen in he Unied

Saes e does no aear o be eiie for a isa on any

suh basis

The resonden esified a e neer suffered as

ar in Meio on aoun of is rae, reiion, naionaiy

ebersi in a ariuar soia rou or oiia oinion

e esified ha e does no fear bein orured Ased if e

feared a a reurning o eio , e resonden firs

esified ords o e effe of " do kno" Asked

reeaedy eer e had any fear a soebody oud ar i

beause of is rae, reigion, naionaiy, ebersi in soe

sor of grou, or oiia oinion he resonden uiaey

ansered No"

The Cour ad he ooruniy o obsere e deeaor

A2-24 8-33 4 January 31, 213


8/12

o the applicant thoghot ths coloq The Cot is

satisied that the esonde ndestood the qestons that he

was beg ased and ndestood the itepete. The Cot

hastes to add that it is ve quc to povide espondents wth

applicatios o asu ad eated potecton de

cicutances i hich it is evidet o i hich it is even

possbe that the espondent a pesent a potentia clai

This spl dd ot appea to be the case i this stance.

The espondent testiied that he did not copete his

high school edcation He s ot gog to school now. e has

neve bee in the nited States aed oces. The Deatet o

Hoeand Sect has ot advised e that it wishes to disiss

o adinistative cose this case the execse o ts

posectoal dsceton. The espondet does appael have a

ciinal histo.

de the cicstances the onl o o ee that

was appaet the appicant cod app o beoe the Cot was

an appication o volnta depate. The Cot explained the

two deet tpes o vota depateL patical in

ght o the espodets dese to eseve his appelate

ghts.

h

espondent esoved to poceed with an

apicaton psat to IA Sectio 2B(b

estion was taen coceng the espondet's

applcaton o volnta depate Fo easons set oth

beow that applcation is denied.

A20-28-33 5 Jaa 3, 203


9/12

En fr n li h uory ulificion

for olunry dprur i i ihin h igrion Judg

dicrion hhr o grn hi for of rlif S 2, _.- Foa: Uline

- Foadere

U. S. .Becerril-Lopez,

54 1 F. 3d 881887 9h Cir. 2008

e denied,

12 S. C. 95 (200. n xrciing hi

dirion h Iigrion Judg u igh oh forl nd

uor fcor SLafarga

. S 0 F. 3d 1213 26

9h Cir 199} cor includ h lin prior iigrion

hiory h nur of hi nri h in iolion of h

!igrion l nd ohr l nd copning ln uch

long r idn in Unid S fily i nd ohr

hunirin conidrion S Mr of Go 14 &N c.

/

a: U l

adr24 4 (BIA 1972), modified

_

t

he

E

g

r

un

ds

Matter of Torre, 19 _F

_

o

_

a

t

_

_ _

_

r

_ _

n

I N c 18 (BIA 18 4 ) . . , For_a_t: _d

n

_

n hi c r r r fcor h ili

in for of grn of olunry dprur Th rpondn h

n in h Unid S inc 2003 i in illgl u

nd undr circunc in hich nrd h Unid S

igly h r pondn nrd h Unid S hn h

ju ou o urn 6 yr old Th rpondn i ployd

li undr circunc in hih hr i no idnc h

i uhorizd o or in h Unid S. Nonhl h

Cour d hi o forl fcor.

Th rpondn i in rlionhip ih on ho

l o i undound. Sh h rl chidrn. Th r pondn

A200-24 8313 6 Jnury 3 2013

omad Urne

oad e

Foad: Iet Fis 1


10/12

h een erng ther gure to thee chldren d to

e credted or th The ort nd th to e orle

ctor

The pd t Cr h o other gncnt l

te n the nted Stte pret re ot n the

Unted Stte He urred He h no chldre He h o

rother or ter n the nted Stte There no edece

o gncnt propert te n the Unted Stte The

repodet h ot ered the Unted Stte Ared orce e

doe tted chrch_lthough the repodet relgo

certnl no une o the ourt, the our tret th

orle ctor or t how te to the cout The

repondent doe ot engge n olnteer work

The ourt lo h condered the repodet'

teto tht he w rreted n or ot Septeer 1 or

drng uder the luece o lcohol He expled tht th

rre t culted ro crctce n whch, whle drng

wthot lcene the repondent w t to drnk ve to x

eer nd get ehd the wheel o cr He teted ht

there were chldre n the cr

There no edence tht od w ured

relt onethele the or ke pecc ndg

o ct tht the repondent preeted k to the count

when wthot lcene he droe uder the nluence o e to

x eer The ourt nd th to e an dere dcretonr

A4 8- 7 nur 1

_ ./ -{ : Fir l "


11/12

fa T Cu als ns n f is vn

uing in pb 2

iging all s fac s g Cu ds

n bliv i wuld b a spnsibl is f is discin

gan spndns appain vluna dpau

Adingl a applicain is dni

T bing n appliains lif

pin pnding bf C spndn is dd

vd Unid as M n ag naid

in i Appa

ORER

all fging asns IT I EREY ORERE a

spndns appliain vluna pau psuan

IA n 24{} and 8 CR in 2426 is dnid

I I EREY URTER ORERE a spndn sall

b vd f nd as i n ag

naind in i Appa

A2248

ease see e ntp

age

or electsitue

II J COAIigain Judg

8 Janua


12/12

/Isl

igraton Judge PHILIP J. COSTA

cap n Apr 18, 2013 a 1:45 PM GMT

A200-283 9 anary 1 2013

Marcelino Segundo-Sanchez, A200 248 313 (BIA Dec. 29, 2014)

Documents

Transcript of Marcelino Segundo-Sanchez, A200 248 313 (BIA Dec. 29, 2014)