Mapping of Stakeholders, Identification of Good Practices, Policy Recommendations First outcomes of...
-
Upload
moses-arnold-lindsey -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Mapping of Stakeholders, Identification of Good Practices, Policy Recommendations First outcomes of...
Mapping of Stakeholders, Identification of Good Practices, Policy Recommendations
First outcomes of the report Mapping of relevant stakeholders describing activities, positions and good practices including recommendations for
synergies prepared in the frame of the Danube-INCO.NET
27-28.10.2015, Ulm, Germany
Overviewo The activity: Aims and Objectiveso Realizationo Stakeholders under investigationo Findings & Policy Recommendations
The Activity: Aims and Objectives
The activity: Aims and Objectives
Danube-INCO.NET aims to support RI policy dialogue in the EUSDR PA SGsThe mapping of stakeholders relating to research and innovation aims to:
o give an overview of regional or EU programmeso find complementaritieso identify transferable good practiceso formulate policy recommendationso support strategic decisions
The activity: Aims and Objectives
Timeline
First results – beginning of 2015
1st Stakeholders Workshop – 06.2015
2nd Stakeholders Workshop – 10.2015
Revision of the report – beginning of 2016
3rd Stakeholders Workshop – during 2016
Realization
RealizationSTAKEHOLDERS are regarded in this case that can affect or are affected by research, innovation & higher education aspects of EUSDR
Our aim was to
identify
map
reach out to
evaluate
these stakeholders
Main scopes of the investigation
1) Character of the initiative/stakeholder
2) Recent achievements, outcomes (last 3-5 years)
3) Future priorities (next 3-5 years)
4) Good practices
5) Relation to other stakeholders
6) Type of programmes funded
7) Additional aspects (type, targeted fields, funding, etc.)
Stakeholders under investigation
Stakeholders under investigation: relevant from RI & education or having transferable good practices
Stakeholders based in the DR
Regional and/or transnational stakeholders
Stakeholders at EU level
Stakeholders at international
level
Total
Networks 8 3 2 - 13Organizations with status of international organization
1 4 - - 5
Organizations with intergovernmental feature
- 5 - - 5
Associations/NGOs 1 - - 3 4Agencies/funds/ programmes
- 3 3 1 7
Other 4 2 - - 6Total 14 17 5 4 40
Stakeholders based in the Danube Region
Regional and/or transnational stakeholders
Networks Danube Rectors’ Conference (DRC)Danube Universities (DU)Council of Danube Cities and Regions (CoDCR)CLDR Romania Danube AllianceDanubizDanube Cluster Network (DanuClus)Young Citizens Danube Network (YCDN)
Black Sea - Danube Regional Network for Social & Economic InnovationCEI Network of Focal Points on Science and TechnologyCentral European Initiative University Network (CEI UniNet)
Organizations with status of international organization
International Association for Danube Research (IAD) Black Sea Economic Cooperation (BSEC)The Regional Network for Central and South Eastern Europe of ICA (CASEE)Regional Cooperation Council (RCC)Southeast European Cooperative Initiative (SECI)
Organizations with intergovernmental feature
Central European Initiative (CEI)Steering Platform on Research for the WBCSalzburg ForumSouth-East European Cooperation Process (SEECP) Visegrad 4 Cooperation (V4)
Associations/NGOs Danube Chambers of Commerce Association (DCCA)
Agencies/funds/ programmes
Visegrad FundCentral European Exchange Programme for University Studies (CEEPUS)Western Balkans Research and Innovation Strategy Exercise (WISE) Facility
Other Ulm Follow-up GroupSteinbeis Danube CenterMinisterial Commissioner for the EUSDR of HungaryDanube Area Interregional Group at the Committee of the Regions
Southeast Europe Investment Committee (SEEIC)Vienna Economic Forum (VEF)
European Union Stakeholders at international level
Networks European Cluster Alliance (ECA)Enterprise Europe Network (EEN)
Agencies/funds/programmes
Central Europe (CE)Southeast Europe Transnational Programme (SEE)Danube Transnational Programme (Danube TP)
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)
Associations Association of the European Chambers of Commerce and Industry (Eurochambers)Association of Regional Development Agencies (EURADA)
Stakeholders on the website: http://danube-inco.net/cooperation_and_networking/organisati
ons
Findings
The findings of the report are centered around
1) Policy dialogue and priority setting
2) Topics covered by stakeholders
3) Activities or programmes supported by stakeholders
4) Initiatives targeting cross-sectoral dialogue
1) Policy dialogue and priority setting
o most stakeholders are in touch with national or EU stakeholders (DRC, RCC, CEI),
however, few initiatives have already proved to be successful in influencing decision-
making at national or EU-level (EURADA, VEF)
o efforts already taken to be involved in EUSDR (CoDCR, Steinbeis, Ulm Follow-up, etc.)
o many have already harmonized their action plans or strategies with the Europe 2020
Strategy (CEI, SEEIC, Eurochambers)
o stakeholders are aware of potential synergies but there is no proof for joint actions
neither in priority setting nor in defining the scope and target of programmes
o stakeholders at EU or international levels (Eurochambers, EURADA, EEN or ECA)
covering the Danube Region do not necessarily reflect the priorities of the EUSDR
Cooperation web of selected stakeholders
2) Topics covered by stakeholders• Targeted field of
stakeholders:– 78 % have
innovation as one of targeted fields
• Scientific areas targeted– 64 % have different
thematic priorities out of which „environment, climate change” is the most popular
1%6%
5% 3%
11%
8%
14%12%6%1%
33%
Health
ICT
Biotechnology, food, agricul-ture
Nanotechnology, manufactur-ing
Energy
Transport
Environment, climate change
Social sciences and humanities
Security
Space
Not targeted
3) Activities or programmes supported by stakeholders
• Programmes funded by stakeholders– 20 out of 40 provide funding for different programmes (CEEPUS, CEI,
DRC, BSEC, Danube Universities)– regarding their scope, target audience and publication of calls,
coordination is ostensibly missing• Type of activities funded
– Networking and mobility are the most frequent activities funded– specific activities to support their members in applying for EU funds
R&D projects Innovation projects
Mobility, career development
Networking (workshops, conferences)
Joint use of R&D facilities/joint laboratories
02468
10121416
87
10
16
8
Type of Activities to be funded
3) Activities or programmes supported by stakeholders
o establishment of well-functioning networks (DRC, Danube Universities, etc.) representing added value for their members
o setting-up a platform for RTDI stakeholders to enhance dialogue (SP WBC, Ulm-Follow up)
o organization of campaigns for target groups(CoDCR, Danube-Black Sea Regional Network)
o increasing cross-border cooperation(ECA, DRC, Visegrad Fund, BSEC, etc.)
o strong will to cooperate with (DRC, DU) and promote SMEs (DCCA, Danubiz, Eurochambers, EEN, etc.)
o knowledge and technology transfer (SEE, WISE, CEI-PRAISE)
3) Activities or programmes supported by stakeholders
Future priorities of selected stakeholders among others:o generating joint projects, co-funding of projects –
including H2020, educational cooperation, etc. o capacity buildingo promoting SMEs, business development and
entrepreneurshipo focus on intercultural society, cultural heritage,
cultureo facilitating tourism, trade and investment
4) Initiatives targeting cross-sectoral dialogue
o linkages among the academia – industry – governmental sectors are rather scarce and weak
o only a few actors (e.g. Steinbeis Danube Center) are devoted to the enhancement of this kind of cooperation
Policy Recommendations
Main aspects of Policy Recommendations
1) Reinforced Policy Dialogue among Stakeholders to Exploit Synergies and Achieve Mutual Goals
2) Enhanced Involvement of Stakeholders in the Implementation of EUSDR
3) Expanding Joint Programmes to Connect and Exploit the Potentials of the Region
4) Support to the RI Community5) Strengthened Dialogue among the academia –
industry – government axis
Reinforced Policy Dialogue among Stakeholders to Exploit Synergies and Achieve Mutual
Goals
o improving the visibility of stakeholders’ activities on their websites, via newsletters
o enhancing dialogue among stakeholders under investigation (harmonize programmes,
fund complementary programmes, exploit different funding instruments)
o Organizing dedicated events to provide a platform for continuous dialouge among
regional stakeholders
o reinforcing the Ulm-Follow up Group
o emphasizing aspects of culture, tourism and trade
o dialogue with other regions and/or macro regions
The project Danube-INCO.NET aims at facilitating the set-up and framing of this dialogue by
organizing dedicated events
Policy Recommendations (1)
Policy Recommendations (2)
Enhanced Involvement of Stakeholders in the Implementation of EUSDRo tightening linkages of regional stakeholders to EU
organizations & EUSDRo EU & int'l organizations shall react to the priorities of
EUSDRo Use of existing funds to achieve the goals of EUSDRo at national level, establishing the coordination
mechanism for the implementation of EUSDR
Policy Recommendations (3)
Expanding Joint Programmes to Connect and Exploit the Potentials of the Regiono enhancing joint programmeso extending existing programmes to other forms of
cooperationo initiating programmes resulting in tangible outcomes, such
as development of research infrastructure, specific research centres in line with S3, etc.
o long-term programmes to facilitate the involvement of the industry
o Impact oriented programming with monitoring
Policy Recommendations (4)
Support to the RI communityo facilitating networking among researchers and
innovatorso spreading information on calls, programmes, events
in a more structured wayo reducing administrative burdens of researcherso encouraging national RI community in the
implementation of EUSDR
Policy Recommendations (5)
Strengthened dialogue among the academia – industry – government axiso develop joint research –
innovation – education programmes
o promoting linkages among science, academia and business
First, use of national or EU funds then financial sustainability
Government (EU, national & regional)
Academia (research institutes,
HEIs)
Industry (companies, SMEs)
Civil sphere
(associations,
NGOs, networks)
Thank you for your attention!The report on Mapping of relevant stakeholders describing activities, positions and good practices including recommendations for synergies is available at http://rcisd.eu/stakeholders-mapping
Virág ZsárRegional Centre for Information & Scientific Development (RCISD)[email protected]
Danube-INCO.NET projectwww.danube-inco.net