Manav Bhattarai: Design of an Impact Evaluation of Sunaula Hazar Din

52
Baseline Findings Impact Evaluation of Sunaula Hazar Din- Community action for Nutrition Project DIME, The World Bank

description

Day 2 of the 2014 Annual Scientific Symposium in Katmandu Nepal, Manav Bhattarai's presentation entitled, "Design of an Impact Evaluation of Sunaula Hazar Din"

Transcript of Manav Bhattarai: Design of an Impact Evaluation of Sunaula Hazar Din

  • Baseline Findings

    Impact Evaluation of Sunaula Hazar Din- Community action for Nutrition Project

    DIME, The World Bank

  • DOLPA

    MUGU

    JUMLA

    KAILALI

    BARDIYA

    HUMLA

    DOTI

    SURKHET

    NAWAL

    PARASI

    KAPIL-

    BASTU RUPAN-

    DEHI

    DANG

    BANKE

    ACHHAM KALIKOT

    JHAPA

    MORANG

    SIRAHA

    SAPTARI

    DARCHULA

    BAJHANG

    BAITADI

    DADEL-

    DHURA

    KANCHAN-

    PUR

    BAJURA

    PARSA

    BARA RAUT-

    AHAT

    DHANUSA

    MAHO-

    TARI

    SUNSARI

    SARLAHI

    DHADING

    MAKAWAN-

    PUR

    CHITWAN

    KASKI

    TANAHU

    PALPA

    SYANGJA

    PARBAT

    ARGHAK

    HACHI

    GULMI

    UDAYAPUR

    SINDHULI

    ILAM

    BHOJ-

    PUR

    DHAN-

    KUTA

    TAPLEJUNG

    OKHAL-

    DHUNGA

    TERHA-

    THUM

    KHOTANG

    LALIT

    BHAK

    KATHM

    SULUK-

    HUMBU

    DOLAKHA

    SANKHUWA-

    SABA

    NUWAKOT

    SINDHU-

    PALCHOK

    KAVRE

    RASUWA

    LAMJUNG

    GORKHA

    PYUT-

    HAN

    ROLPA

    SALYAN

    MYAGDI

    DAILEKH

    JAJARKOT

    RUKUM

    MUSTANG

    MANANG

    CHINA

    INDIA

    N

  • 3

    (+) Impact of the program

    (+) Impact of other (external) factors

    The Value of Control Group

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    Before After

    Treatment Group

    Control Group

  • Impact Evaluation

    Rigorous impact evaluation uses a control group of similar individuals who are not exposed to the project

    Randomization (usually) ensures that control group is a good proxy for treatment group

    4

  • Three Components

    Evaluation of Sunalua Hazar Din has three components: Overall Project Evaluation: Measures the effect of

    SHD compared to control groups Expert Suggestions: Tests whether providing

    communities with expert suggestions will improve outcomes

    Female Leaders: Tests whether requiring female leadership will change goals and outcomes

    5

  • Overall Evaluation Working in 282 out of 292 SHD VDCs

    141 early treatment VDCs start project in 2014 141 late treatment VDCs start project in 2016.

    The IE is working in the 1-2 most disadvantaged wards in each VDC

    Impact of SHD will be determined from comparison of early starters to late starters before late starters begin operations

    A number of outcomes will be studied

    6

  • Sample 282 VDCs (out of 290 for SHD) Least developed 1 or 2 wards selected in each

    VDC In each ward, household census was taken,

    then a random sample of: Group 1: 15 households with a child under 2 Group 2: 10 households with a married woman

    aged 15-25 Total sample of 7049 HHs

    7

  • Households in Group 1 were asked the entire questionnaire. Households in Group 2 were asked the Main Household Questionnaire and additional module on family planning.

    Indicators on family planning come from Group 2, and are therefore representative of married women aged 15-25.

  • IE Design

    9

    282 IE VDCs

    141 VDCs Early Starters begin project

    in 2014

    Standard RRNI Coaching

    (70 VDCs)

    Female Leadership

    Requirement (35 VDCs)

    No Leadership Requirement

    (35 VDCs)

    Coaches suggest

    focus areas (71 VDCs)

    Female Leadership

    Requirement (36 VDCs)

    No Leadership Requirement

    (35 VDCs)

    141 VDCs Late Stasrters begin project

    in 2016

  • IE Activities Household survey of 7049 HHs was taken from

    July-October 2013 Survey was undertaken by Full Bright

    Consulting, under supervision from DIME, The World Bank

    Overall Evaluation: Must be sure that late starter VDCs do not begin

    until around 2016 Follow-up survey must be completed before late

    starter VDCs begin

    10

  • Balance between Early Starters & Late Starters

    11 Note: Standard Errors clustered at VDC-level and District fixed-effects included

    Control (Late Starter) Treatment

    (Early Starter) Balance

    Test

    N Mean SD N Mean SD P Value

    Female headed Household (yes=1) 3512 0.09 0.29 3526 0.1 0.3 0.45

    PDO 1: Unmet Family Planning Needs 820 0.32 0.47 821 0.31 0.46 0.72

    PDO 2 : Pregnant Women taking IFA 2053 0.21 0.40 2042 0.21 0.40 0.87

    PDO 3: Exclusive Breastfeeding 490 0.71 0.46 534 0.68 0.47 0.55

    PDO 4: Minimum Acceptable Diet 1699 0.10 0.30 1685 0.09 0.29 0.34

    PDO 5: Keeping Girls at School 3437 0.36 0.48 3446 0.38 0.49 0.31

    PDO 6: Reducing Indoor Air Pollution 3439 0.35 0.35 3446 0.29 0.33 0.00***

    PDO 7: Pregnant Women's Dietary Needs 2188 0.76 0.43 2192 0.74 0.44 0.16

  • Sample Breakdown

    12

    PresenterPresentation Notes90.3% of the household heads are male, while 9.7% of them are female. 71.3% of the households live in the Outer Terai, while 16.3% live in the Hill and 12.4% in the Inner Terai.

  • 13

    Household Characteristics

  • Primary Occupation

    14

  • Household Head Characteristics

    15

  • Land and Livestock

    16

  • Child Health and Nutrition

    17

  • Malnutrition by Age

    18

  • Malnutrition by Region

    19

  • Breastfeeding by Age

    20

  • Breastfeeding Practices I

    21

  • Breastfeeding Practices II

    22

  • Complementary Feeding Practices

    23

  • Maternal Nutrition and Practices

    24

  • Unmet Family Planning Need

    25

  • Type of Contraception

    26

  • Duration of taking IFA Supplements (during last pregnancy)

    27

  • Maternal Nutrition (previous day)

    28

  • Household Food Consumption over last week

    29

  • Water and Sanitation

    30

  • Source of Drinking Water

    31

  • Toilet Facilities

    32

    Blue portion: Access to Toilet Red portion: No Access to Toilet

  • Feces Reported around House

    33

  • Hand Washing Behavior

    34

  • Community Attitudes 35

  • Families in this community send their daughters to school until at least 20 years of age

    36

  • Attitudes towards Reducing Smoke Pollution

    37

  • Should pregnant women eat at least 3 meals a day, including animal products?

    38

  • 39

    Social Cohesion

  • Most people in this village can be trusted.

    40

  • In the past year, have you worked with others in your village for the

    benefit of the community?

    41

  • What proportion of people in this village contribute time or money toward common development goals?

    42

  • Differences that Most Often Cause Problem

    43

  • To what extent do differences characterize your village?

    44

  • Thank You!

    45

  • Choice of Focus Groups

    50% of VDCs were urged to select 3 suggested focus groups: 1. Increase Animal Protein 2. IFA/Deworming for Women 3. Breastfeeding or End Open Defecation

    46

  • Appendix I: Project Development Indicators

    47

  • Appendix II: Definition of PDO

    1. PDO 1: Percentage of women who do not want to become pregnant but are not using contraception

    2. PDO 2: Percentage of pregnant women (15-49) taking iron and folic acid (IFA) supplements for 180 days

    3. PDO 3: Percentage of children 0-6 months of age who are exclusively breastfed

    48

  • Appendix II: Definition of PDO

    4. PDO 4: Proportion of children 6-23 months of age who receive a minimum acceptable diet 5. PDO 5: Community attitude towards the importance of keeping girls at school until age 20 6. PDO 6: Community attitudes towards the importance of reducing indoor air pollution 7. PDO 7: Proportion of women with children under 2 years who recognize the importance of eating 3 times a day including at least one animal-sourced food

    49

  • Appendix III: Focus Areas

    1. Maintain adequate weight and regular eating among pregnant women and young children

    2. Increase consumption of animal protein among pregnant women and young children

    3. Practice proper and consistent breastfeeding 4. Use clan and safe water 5. Delay marriage and pregnancy for young girls 6. Regular de-worming and utilization of iron

    supplements by young women

    50

  • Appendix III: Focus Areas

    7. Extend education of young girls 8. Utilize family planning method to avoid

    unwanted pregnancies 9. Practice proper and consistent hand washing 10. Ensure immunization of all children 11. End open defecation

    51

  • Appendix III: Focus Areas

    12. Ensure prompt medical treatment of chest infection, fever, and diarrhea in young children 13. Improve school sanitation 14. Reduce workload of pregnant women 15. Reduce exposure to indoor smoke for

    pregnant women and young children

    52

    Baseline FindingsSlide Number 2The Value of Control GroupImpact EvaluationThree ComponentsOverall EvaluationSampleSlide Number 8IE DesignIE ActivitiesBalance between Early Starters & Late StartersSample BreakdownHousehold CharacteristicsPrimary OccupationHousehold Head CharacteristicsLand and LivestockChild Health and NutritionMalnutrition by AgeMalnutrition by RegionBreastfeeding by AgeBreastfeeding Practices IBreastfeeding Practices IIComplementary Feeding PracticesMaternal Nutrition and PracticesUnmet Family Planning NeedType of ContraceptionDuration of taking IFA Supplements (during last pregnancy)Maternal Nutrition (previous day)Household Food Consumption over last weekWater and SanitationSource of Drinking WaterToilet FacilitiesFeces Reported around HouseHand Washing BehaviorCommunity AttitudesFamilies in this community send their daughters to school until at least 20 years of ageAttitudes towards Reducing Smoke PollutionShould pregnant women eat at least 3 meals a day, including animal products?Slide Number 39Most people in this village can be trusted.In the past year, have you worked with others in your village for the benefit of the community?What proportion of people in this village contribute time or money toward common development goals?Differences that Most Often Cause ProblemTo what extent do differences characterize your village?Thank You!Choice of Focus GroupsAppendix I: Project Development IndicatorsAppendix II: Definition of PDOAppendix II: Definition of PDOAppendix III: Focus AreasAppendix III: Focus AreasAppendix III: Focus Areas