Managing Civil Infrastructure on the Basis of Structural ......1 Managing Civil Infrastructure on...

28
1 Managing Civil Infrastructure on the Basis of Structural Health Monitoring Christian Boller, Jochen Kurz and Gerd Dobmann Fraunhofer Institute of Non-Destructive Testing Methodology (IZFP) Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken/Germany © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP 1 51st Brazilian Concrete Congress Curitiba/Brazil, October 6-10, 2009 Built forever!? © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP 2

Transcript of Managing Civil Infrastructure on the Basis of Structural ......1 Managing Civil Infrastructure on...

  • 1

    Managing Civil Infrastructure on the Basis of Structural Health Monitoring

    Christian Boller, Jochen Kurz and Gerd DobmannFraunhofer Institute of Non-Destructive Testing Methodology (IZFP)

    Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken/Germany

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    1

    51st Brazilian Concrete CongressCuritiba/Brazil, October 6-10, 2009

    Built forever!?

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    2

  • 2

    B52 – Built to fly 100 years?

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    3

    Design Principles for Structures100%

    50%0%Stress Without inspection of the component

    (no corrosion effects considered)

    Safe Life

    SafeLife

    Log cycles

    StressInspectable

    crack possible

    Damage tolerance

    Fracture With inspection of the component(no corrosion effects considered)

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    4

    Log cycles

    Short cracks Slow crack propagation

    Fail safe

    Endurance limit SafeLife

  • 3

    Estimation of damage accumulation

    Time

    ltage

    A

    B D

    I. Load signal

    Time

    ain

    A

    B Dmax

    II. Countingload cycles

    IV. Fatigueevaluation

    Vol

    C

    Stra

    C

    min

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    5

    III. Rainflow matrix

    )Strength Residual( fN =Δ

    Res

    idua

    l stre

    ngth

    Critical crack length

    Detectable crack length

    Cra

    ck le

    ngth

    ΔN

    Δa

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    6

    Crack lengthNumber of cycles or time

  • 4

    Steps to be considered for crack propagation calculation

    1. Initial crack length a02 Y factor

    For example:2. Y factor3. Load (stress)4. K value5. Crack propagation

    equation (i.e. Forman)6. Crack extension ∆a

    waY πsec=

    aYKI πσ=

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    7

    7. a = a0+∆a & back to step 1 with a0 = a ( ) KKR

    KCdNda

    c

    m

    F

    F

    Δ−−Δ

    =1

    Influence of Stringers on Fracture

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    8

    Source: A. Grant: Fundamentals of Structural Integrity

  • 5

    Fatigue Design

    Airframe Fatigue Design Principles

    Safe Life Design Damage Tolerant Design

    Fail SafeSlow Crack Propagation

    How muchpotential left?

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    9

    Crack StopperMultiple Load Path

    Ageing bridge infrastructure in Germany

    Autobahn

    National

    Ageing bridge infrastructure in Germany over the last centuryBridges and highways

    Age of structure relative to the number of constructions [%] (Date: 31.12.2005, source BASt)

    15.8BABB Str World

    changed:

    • More traffic

    • Environment

    • etc.

    National Highways

    5.4

    2.5

    5.9

    11.912.3

    8.4

    7.17.5

    11.8

    9.7

    2.3 2.52.6

    4.8

    7.3

    9.6 9.6

    13.5

    9.6

    8.88.4 8.5 8.4

    B-Str

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    10

    BUT

    2008 Civil infrastructure remained

    0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.20.5

    0.1 0.40.70.8

    0.40.7 0.8

    0.3 0.6 0.6

    bis1899

    1900 -1909

    1910 -1919

    1920 -1929

    1930 -1934

    1935 -1939

    1940 -1944

    1945 -1949

    1950 -1954

    1955 -1959

    1960 -1964

    1965 -1969

    1970 -1974

    1975 -1979

    1980 -1984

    1985 -1989

    1990 -1994

    1995 -1999

    2000 -2004

    2005 -2009

    year of establishment

  • 6

    Civil infrastructure - An issue for monitoring• Bridges

    • Pipelines and processing industry

    • Power supply (e. g. supply lines, wind energy

    Example: bridge area in 106 m2 in Germany sorted by type of construction:

    plants)

    • Dams

    • Buildings of the early ages of reinforced concrete

    • Tunnels

    • Waste refilling

    • Cultural heritage0,16

    5,14

    1,381,840,02SteelComposite

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    11

    Date 31.12.2005, source BASt

    g

    • Others19,39

    StoneConcretePrestressed ConcreteWood

    Options and challenges for life cycle management

    Options: Challenges:

    • Sensors and miniaturisation• Robotics

    • Enhanced computation power

    • Internet

    • Wireless data communication

    • CAE simulation

    P ti

    • New materials• Higher loads

    • Global warming

    • Criminal threats and security policies

    • Regulations

    • Possibly others

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    12

    • Prognostics

    • Risk assessment

    • Life cycle cost analysis

  • 7

    BetoScan: self navigating mobile robot

    Batteries

    BetoScan

    Sensors

    Robot with 2 computer systems

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    13

    Air temperature and humidity

    Concrete humidity (surface)

    Concrete humidity (volume)

    Concrete coverage Geometry information

    Reinforcement information Corrosion risk

    Hytelog Hf MOIST RP, microwaveHf MOIST PP,

    microwaveProfometer, eddy

    currentAcsys A1220,

    ultrasound Mala ProEx, radarCanin, potential

    (resistivity)

    BetoScan: multi-sensor data acquisition

    BetoScan

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    14

  • 8

    OOnnSSite ite SCASCAnnenneRR

    OSSCAR

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    15

    www.vdivde-it.de/innonet

    OOnnSSite ite SCASCAnnenneRR

    OSSCAR

    Reinforcement

    Data cube also called OLAP (Online Analytical Processing) cube data format

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    16

    information Geometry information Concrete coverage

    Mala ProEx, radar Acsys A1220, ultrasound Profometer, eddy current Generalized data concept

  • 9

    OOnnSSite ite SCASCAnnenneRR

    OSSCAR

    Data acquisition and

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    17

    Data acquisition and motion control

    Data analysis: comparison, fusion, joint-inversion

    Data fusion:

    Outlook data analysis

    Test specimen before placing of concrete

    Fused image of NDT data measured at specimen on the left

    Source: BAM Berlin

    combination of multiple source data to achieve inferences

    Joint inversion or multi-

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    18

    objective optimization: finding model that explains several data sets at once Data cube Function container

  • 10

    Visualisation of inner parts of constructionsUltrasound measurements on a concrete deck

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    19

    Source: Alexander Taffe, BAM Berlin

    Diagnosis of prestressed tendons

    Magnetic rotating head scanner

    Rotating speed: 2HzLinear speed: 720m/hRotor diameter: 3.5m

    electromagnet

    magnetic sensors

    sensor traces

    Application: prestressed steel rupturedetection in concrete plates rotating head

    scanner

    measurement results of a concrete bridge

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    20

    prestressing tendons

    ruptures

    ……

    Source: Klaus Szielasko and Albert Kloster, IZFP Saarbrücken

  • 11

    Crack and flaw detection in pipelines

    Inspection of pipelines using pigs

    LDefect contour Simplification

    Crack and flaw detection by ultrasound pigs

    Correlation of data from mearuemnts and geometry models of cracks for assessment

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    21

    dt

    L• Up to 300 km of pipelines have to be inspected in one run

    • Signals from up to 1000 sensors have to analysed for each segment

    Source: W. Bähr IZFP & O.A. Barbian NDT Systems & Services

    Barkhausen noise and Eddy current MIcroscope (BEMI)

    3D Manipulator Control PCMiniaturised inductive sensor(modified video recorder head)

    Stationary Electromagnet(for Barkhausen Mode)

    3D Manipulator Control PC (modified video recorder head)

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    22

    Resolution: ~ 10 μm• Manipulator control• Eddy current hardware• Barkhausen noise hardware

    Records Barkhausen noise

    Source: M. Rabung, U. Rabe, S. Hirsekorn, I. Altpeter, Fraunhofer IZFP

  • 12

    HCM ~ HC HCµ ~ HC

    Monitoring Technique

    Flux Density B

    Barkhausen Noise

    CM C Cµ C

    Higher Mode AnalysisMulti Frequency Eddy

    Current Impedance

    Superimposed Permeability

    Magnetisation Force H

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    23

    Source: K. Szielasko, R. Tschuncky, I. Altpeter, Fraunhofer IZFP

    Quantitative NDT / Calibration

    Data Base(NDT Recorded Data + Reference Data)

    Computation

    (Approximation Function, Similarities, …)

    Residual Austenite

    (Approximation Function, Similarities, …)Hardness

    (Approximation Function, Similarities, …)

    Residual Stresses

    p(Regression Analysis, Pattern Recognition, …)

    QNDT

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    24

    QNDTHardness

    QNDTResidualAustenite

    QNDTStress

    Source: K. Szielasko, R. Tschuncky, I. Altpeter, Fraunhofer IZFP

  • 13

    3MA Test System

    Control Unit:- Notebook- Industrial PC- Server

    3MA-Frontend- TCP/IP interface- Network link- ExtendableExtendable

    Modular Hardware

    - Components linked via aTCP/IP interface

    - Expandable throughadditional components(i.e. magnetostriction, US)

    - Easily upgradable withnew components

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    25

    3MA-Sensor- Available in different sizes and shapes

    new components

    Source: K. Szielasko, R. Tschuncky, I. Altpeter, Fraunhofer IZFP

    MikroMach Test System

    Mikromagnetic Materials charakterisationMaterials charakterisation in its most compact form

    Sensor = Test Equipment

    Link control PC via

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    26

    Standardised USB link

    Source: K. Szielasko, I. Altpeter, Fraunhofer IZFP

  • 14

    Quantitative Determination of Residual Stresses

    ∆α = 14.04°

    ∆α = 22.26°∆α =

    0.95°

    Stamp Edge

    0

    300

    400

    500

    600M

    Pa] (

    3MA

    ) A001A003A002A004B001B002

    A001 A003 ∆α = 14.04°

    A002 A004

    ∆α = 22 26°

    -300

    -200

    -100

    0

    100

    200

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

    Res

    idua

    l Str

    ess σ

    [M

    B002X-Ray Ref. A001X-Ray Ref. A002X-Ray Ref. B001

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    27

    04

    8

    22.26°

    B001 B002

    Position [cm]

    Source: B. Wolter, K. Szielasko, I. Altpeter, Fraunhofer IZFP

    17 CrNiMo 6 residual stress maeasurement in 400

    600

    800

    Oberfläche

    QNDT of Residual Stresses due to Machining

    maeasurement in gear wheels

    -400

    -200

    0

    200

    3MA

    -Wer

    t

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    28

    -600-600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600 800

    Eigenspannung [M Pa] (X-ray)

    Source: B. Wolter, K. Szielasko, I. Altpeter, Fraunhofer IZFP

  • 15

    Results:

    Calibaration Probes:

    Residual Austenite Determination on Anchor Bolts using 3MA

    44 Anchor bolts with a RA of 2,6% 43 Anchor bolts with a RA of 2,6%44 Anchor bolts with a RA of 4,6% 43 Anchor bolts with a RA of 11,3%15 Anchor bolts with a RA of 5,8%

    Validation Probes:

    Charge 1 with a RA of 3,4%

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    29

    Charge 1 with a RA of 3,4% Charge 2 with a RA of 4,8% Charge 3 with a RA of 4,9% Charge 4 with a RA of 4,5% 25 anchor bolts each from different hardening charges

    Source: K. Szielasko, R. Tschuncky, I. Altpeter, Fraunhofer IZFP

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    1600

    m [M

    Pa] (

    3MA

    )

    Ultimate Strength

    Inspection of Sheet Steel using the 3MA System

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    1600

    .2 [M

    Pa] (

    3MA

    )

    0

    200

    400

    0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

    Rm [MPa] (zerstörend)

    R m

    Yield Strength

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    30

    0

    200

    400

    0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

    Rp0.2 bzw. REH [MPa] (zerst.)

    R p0.

    Trolley with integrated 3MA Systemfor inspection of milled sheets during rolling

    Unit for remote control of trolley with 3MA system

    Source: B. Wolter, K. Szielasko, I. Altpeter, Fraunhofer IZFP

  • 16

    The Central Question

    Without compromising safety, could we make our structures:– Better available?– Lighter weight?– More cost efficient?– More reliable?

    by making sensors (and possibly also actuators) t b i t l t f th t t ?

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    31

    to become an integral part of the structure?

    What about …• Looking at advanced cheap sensors, which are

    continuously becoming– Smaller,

    Li ht– Lighter,– Cheaper?

    • Making the sensors an integral part of the structural component?

    • Combining the sensors through advanced microelectronics and possibly– Wireless technology with

    Advanced microprocessors and

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    32

    – Advanced microprocessors and – Advanced signal processing?

  • 17

    Structural Health Monitoring (SHM)

    … is the integration of sensing and possibly also actuation devices to allow the loading and damaging conditions of a structure to be g grecorded, analysed, localised and predicted in a way that non-destructive testing becomes an integral part of the structure. SHM is not an additional NDT application, nor QNDT, a fatigue analysis, vibration analysis, signal processing, material science or any other single technological area but rather lateral integration

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    33

    technological area but rather lateral integration of all those in terms of a structure’s life cycle management.

    What We Need to Know

    • Structural Behaviour and Performance• Loads• Design Principles• Maintenance• Systems for Structural Assessment• Emerging Technologies

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    34

    e g g ec o og es

  • 18

    Enhancing Damage Tolerance through SHM

    Stress

    Gain in weight

    Stress

    Gain in weight

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    35

    Life

    withmonitoring

    withoutmonitoring

    Gain in life

    Life

    withmonitoring

    withoutmonitoring

    Gain in life

    Source: H.-J. Schmidt, Airbus

    Technologies Beyond State-of-the-Art in Aircraft NDT

    WavelengthWavelength

    Inte

    nsity

    Inte

    nsity Incident Light Transmission

    Index Modulation WavelengthWavelength

    Inte

    nsity

    Inte

    nsity Incident Light Transmission

    Index Modulation

    Smart Layer:Acousto-Ultrasonics

    Optical Fibre Bragg Grating Sensor:• Strain• Pressure

    Period Λ

    Inte

    nsity

    λ Bragg

    Wavelength

    Reflection

    Period Λ

    Inte

    nsity

    λ Bragg

    Wavelength

    Reflection

    • Pressure• Temperature

    Acoustic Emission

    Phased Array

    Electro

    MEMS

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    36

    ComparativeVacuumMonitoring:• Crack

    Electro MagneticLayer

  • 19

    What is a Sensor?

    Amplifier DataA i iti

    Switch Box

    p Acquisition

    Processor

    Amplifier WaveformGenerator

    Smart Suitcase™Smart Layer®

    with 12 transducers

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    37

    Smart Suitcasewith 12 transducers

    Smart Sensing System with 1 input and output

    Stress measurements of a suspension bridge

    • Six strands on center-east and anchorage chamber measured

    Fibre optic sensors for loads monitoringCable opened for tests

    • SOFO Dynamic fiber optic sensing system used• Two 12-wheels trucks, ~30 tons each• Quasi-static test: 7 km/h; dynamic test: 72 km/h

    Anchor block tested

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    38

    Source: Smartec SA, Lugano Switzerland

  • 20

    Remote dynamic loads monitoring

    SSI implemented in Labview VI operates in real-time and confirms operation of TMD during strong winds via eight-times increase in damping

    25

    30

    10-2

    100

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    39

    Source: James Brownjohn, The University of Sheffield0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

    5

    10

    15

    20

    Frequency (Hz)

    Ord

    er

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 410-10

    10-8

    10-6

    10-4

    Structural health monitoring using wireless sensor networks

    sensors- robust - low power consumption- high bandwidth - cheap

    wireless data transmission( i l

    self configuring netzwork

    embedded networkingautomatic data

    MEMS / MotesMEMS / Motes

    Insitu-Processing

    wireless RF data

    transmission Daten

    transmitter and receiver (internet)

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    40

    Source: Christian Grosse MPA University of Stuttgart

    (wireless communication)

    netzwork extractionself calibrating

    transmission of a few but meaningful data

    extrahierten Daten

    transmittermobile data collector

    server

    Analysis / AlarmAnalysis / Alarm

  • 21

    Acoustic emission sensors

    Specimen Sensor Attachment

    sensorsPhased arraytransducers

    Smart Layer transducers

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    41

    Acoustic emission sensors

    3

    4

    1to22 (Path 1) 3to23 (Path 2) 2to24 (Path 3) 4to25 (Path 4) 5to26 (Path 5) 6to27 (Path 6) 7to28 (Path 7) 10to17 (Path 8)

    Damage Index of the 1st wave packet in parallel wave path

    Normalized Damage Index = Measured Damage Index / 1st Damage Index

    Channel numberChannel numberThreshold

    Data Processing Results

    1

    2

    3

    Dam

    age

    Inde

    x

    9to16 (Path 9) 12to19 (Path 10) 11to18 (Path 11) 14to21 (Path 12) 13to20 (Path 13)

    132456710912111413

    20 21 18 19 16 17 28 27 26 25 24 23 22

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    42

    3000

    040

    000

    5000

    060

    000

    7000

    080

    000

    9000

    0

    1000

    00

    1100

    00

    1200

    00

    1300

    00

    1400

    00

    1500

    00

    1600

    00

    1700

    00

    1800

    00

    0

    No. of cycle

    AU sensor - SMART Layer

    Cracked area

  • 22

    Argumentation of Threshold Setting

    Damage Index against the estimation of the crack length from the parallel paths at 183kcycle

    1 0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    Dam

    age

    Inde

    x

    Damage Index against Crack length

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    43

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16crack length [in mm]

    Constraints:

    Transducer Locations

    Crack Location

    Crack Initiation at Countersunk Rivet Holes

    Constraints:• Transducers only to be

    placed inside the fuselage• Acoustic signals passing a

    lap can reduce up to a factor of 4

    • Area around riveted lap allows for a multitude of

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    44

    acoustic wave reflections

    OuterFuselage

    InnerFuselage

  • 23

    Wave Modulation at Tapered Surfaces

    Crack

    Crack

    Cra ck Initia tion

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    45

    Am

    plitu

    de (a

    rbitr

    ary)

    I: Incident Wae, R: Reflected Wave

    UX,topUX,bottomUY,topUYb tt

    (S0)I (S0)Rθ=90o

    Am

    plitu

    de

    I:Incident Wave, R: Reflected Wave, C: Converted Wave

    UX,topUX,bottomUY,topUY bottom

    (S0)R(S0)I (A0)CTRθ=45o

    Mode Conversion at Tapered Surfaces

    0 20 40 60 80 100 120Time (μsec)

    UY,bottom

    0 20 40 60 80 100 120-0 4

    -0.2

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    Am

    plitu

    de,

    ε xx

    S0(Incidend)

    S0(Reflected)

    0 20 40 60 80 100 120

    Am

    plitu

    de,

    ε xx

    S0(Incident)

    TR A0(Converted)S0

    (Reflected)

    0 20 40 60 80 100 120Time (μsec)

    Y,bottom

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    46

    0 20 40 60 80 100 1200.4Time (μsec)

    0 20 40 60 80 100 120Time (μsec)

    Time (μsec)

    frequ

    ency

    (MH

    z)

    0 20 40 60 80 100 1200

    0.4

    1 IncidentS0

    ReflectedS0

    Transient C/RConverted

    A0

    Time (μsec)

    frequ

    ency

    (MH

    z)

    0 20 40 60 80 100 1200

    0.4

    1 IncidentS0

    ReflectedS0

  • 24

    X

    Y (mm)

    015

    0 15 30 45 60

    X

    Y (mm)

    015

    0 15 30 45 60

    Effect of Holes on Scattered Wave Distribution

    X

    Y (mm)

    015

    0 15 30 45 60

    X

    Y (mm)

    015

    0 15 30 45 60

    (mm

    )5

    30(m

    m)

    530

    0.9

    1

    1.1

    0.9

    1

    1.1

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    47

    (mm

    )30

    45(m

    m)

    3045

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    Meshing for Cracks around Holes

    Without Crack With Crack

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    48

    Without Crack With Crack

  • 25

    400

    450

    0.9

    1

    ++++++

    +++++++

    + 400

    450

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    400

    450

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    400

    450

    0 6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    Effect of Cracks on Scattered Wave Differentials

    X (mm)

    Y (m

    m)

    0 50 100250

    300

    350

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    ++ + + + +

    ++ + + + ++

    +

    X (mm)

    Y (m

    m)

    0 50 100250

    300

    350

    -0.2

    -0.1

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    X (mm)

    Y (m

    m)

    0 50 100250

    300

    350

    -0.1

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    X (mm)

    Y (m

    m)

    0 50 100250

    300

    350

    -0.1

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    Reference 10 mm Crack 15 mm Crack 20 mm Crack

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    49

    Crack length 2.5 x rivet diameter needs to be monitored no further away than 12.5 x rivet diameter

    Crack 10.91

    0.9

    1

    Multiple Path Monitoring for Confidence Enhancement

    1

    3

    24

    5A

    6

    8

    79

    10

    B

    20 10 20 15 15 20

    PZT Transducer

    Through Hole

    30 3020 10 20 15 15 20

    PZT Transducer

    Through Hole

    30 30

    C ac

    92

    1 64

    7

    0 2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    Nor

    mal

    ised

    Am

    plitu

    de

    9 46 27 10 2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    Nor

    mal

    ised

    Am

    plitu

    de

    9 46 27 1

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    50

    0 5 10 150.1

    0.2

    Crack 1 Length

    7 1

    0 5 10 150.1

    0.2

    Crack 1 Length

    7 1

  • 26

    500

    Loading Condition Influence on Damage Monitoring

    InitialFatigue + Under static Load Fatigue + Unload

    Ampl

    itude

    (mV)

    100

    200

    300

    400 Fatigue + Under static Load Fatigue + Unload

    1

    3

    24

    5A

    6

    8

    79

    10

    B

    300 30020 10 20 15 15 20

    PZT Transducer

    Through Hole

    30 3020 10 20 15 15 20

    PZT Transducer

    Through Hole

    30 30

    Cracks

    A 2

    1

    3

    4

    5

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    51

    2 3 4 50Path Number

    A 12 3 4 50Path Number

    A

    high frequency

    • Acoustic Emission (passive)

    A t Ult i ( ti )

    Monitoring of Windmill Rotor Blades

    • Acousto Ultrasonic (active)

    Sensor/actor elements

    • piezo fibre patches (HF) as sensors

    (and low range actors)

    36 HF piezo fibre transducer

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    52

    ( g )

    • pzt stacks for lamb wave generation

    (large range actuators)

    6 HF pzt stacksSource: B. Frankenstein et al., Fraunhofer IZFP

  • 27

    • structure independent application for SHM

    SHM Systems

    • online reconfiguration

    • online and offline analysis, documentation of structural damage

    • realization of structure dependent data base

    • development and test of online SHM algorithms

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    53

    Source: B. Frankenstein et al., Fraunhofer IZFP

    SHM in Publication• Internat., European and Asia-Pacific

    Workshop on SHM• Encyclopedia of SHM; John Wiley &

    Sons, 5. Vols., ca. 3,000 pages, 01/2009

    • Structural Health Monitoring – An International Journal; SAGE Publ.

    • Int. Journal on Structural Control and Monitoring; John Wiley & Sons

    • Smart Materials and Structures; Inst. of Physics Publ.

    • Intelligent Material Systems and Structures; SAGE Publ.

    • Staszewski W.J., C. Boller and G.R. Tomlinson (Ed.s), 2003: Health Monitoring of Aircraft Structures; J

    • Introduction and Definitions • Physical Monitoring Principles • Signal Processing • Simulation

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    54

    Monitoring of Aircraft Structures; J. Wiley & Sons

    • Balageas D., C.-P. Fritzen and A. Güemes, 2005: Structural Health Monitoring; ISTE Ltd.

    • …

    • Simulation • Sensors• Systems and System Design• Principles of SHM-Based Structural

    Monitoring, Design and Maintenance• Aerospace Applications• Civil Engineering Applications • Other Applications• Standardization and Specification• Glossary

  • 28

    • Ageing structures must have a damage tolerance if they should be managed

    • Structural design principles and geometry must be understood• Operational loads need to be known

    Di it l d l f th t t i h l f l f d l ti

    Conclusions

    • Digital model of the structure is helpful for damage accumulation evaluation

    • NDT methods available for in situ structural and materials characterisation

    • Different sensing system principles to be ready for structural integration

    • NDT phenomena around the areas to be monitored have to be known• SHM technologies considered provide sufficient maturity and

    reliability

    © C. Boller, Fraunhofer IZFP

    55

    reliability• A lot of technology around for SHM based ageing infrastructure

    management