Managing a Statewide Network An overview of the CDOT Pavement Management Program Eric Chavez...
-
Upload
presley-dayton -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Managing a Statewide Network An overview of the CDOT Pavement Management Program Eric Chavez...
Managing a Statewide Network
An overview of the CDOT Pavement Management Program
Eric Chavez 303.398.6565
Stephen Henry 303.398.6579
Pavement Management Inputs/Processing/Outputs
Pavement Management Models
Regional Project Inventories
DTD data (Traffic and Climate Zones)
Roadway Condition Data
Index Equations
Remaining Service Life
Roadway Images and Inventory
Good/Fair/Poor Maps (Current Network Condition)Future 20-Year Network Condition Projections
Project Costs and Benefits
Project Recommendation Lists
Resurfacing Funding Allocations
Maintenance Project Info
CDOT Chief Engineer’s Objectives (Matching Projects)
Regional Project Inventories
Maintained and owned by the Regions.
Historical catalogue of all recorded projects on every highway– Year of construction.– Thickness of asphalt or concrete.– Maintenance history.
Division of Transportation Development (DTD) Data
Traffic loading (20-year ESALs.) Climate zones. Highway limits.
Roadway Condition Data
Collected annually. Over 11,000-miles of Colorado
highways. Digital Images of highways,
shoulders, and pavement. Surface distress and severity
collected from the digital images in accordance with the Distress Identification Manual for the Long-Term Pavement Performance Program.
Data reported on 1/10-mile intervals
Condition Data
Distress Types:– Fatigue cracking– Longitudinal
cracking– Transverse
cracking– Corner breaks– Ride quality as IRI– Rutting
Cracking Distress Severities:– Low– Moderate– High
Roadway ImagesCorner break
Fatigue cracking
Index Equations
Transforms raw distress values into a standardized scale.Scale: 0 – 100.100 is a flawless pavement, no distresses.Value of 50 is an RSL of 0.
One index for each distress.
=100-
(
.
Distress LOW
+
Distress MOD
+
Distress HIGH
)
.
100
MAX LOW MAX MOD MAX HIGH
Maintenance Work
Maintenance activities are reported into the system.
The Pavement Management Program is currently investigating more efficient ways to account for preventive maintenance efforts.
Pavement Management Inputs/Processing/Outputs
Pavement Management Models
Regional Project Inventories
DTD data (Traffic and Climate Zones)
Roadway Condition Data
Index Equations
Remaining Service Life
Roadway Images and Inventory
Good/Fair/Poor Maps (Current Network Condition)Future 20-Year Network Condition Projections
Project Costs and Benefits
Project Recommendation Lists
Resurfacing Funding Allocations
Maintenance Project Info
CDOT Chief Engineer’s Objectives (Matching Projects)
Remaining Service Life (RSL) Definition
The estimated number of years, from a specified date in
time, until a pavement section reaches the threshold
distress index. RSL is a function of the distress level and
rate of deterioration. (Pavement Management Manual)
RSL = 0 : The point where a pavement’s condition has
reached a remaining service life of zero years due to
distresses and age. The Remaining Service Life pertains to
the last treatment and not necessarily the entire pavement.
A project level investigation of the pavement is necessary
to determine the best, most cost-effective treatment.
(Pavement Management Manual)
RSL: Site-Specific Regression Curve
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Transverse Regression Curve:HWY 2A, D1, MP 3.0 - 4.2Year of Last Work: 2002
Index Values
Project Age
Tra
ns
ve
rse
Ind
ex
Va
lue
RSL
17 – 8 = 9
Threshold Index = 50
(RSL = 0)
Threshold Age
Current Age
Requirements• 5 years worth of data.• St Dev. <10• R2 >= 0.5
RSL: Family Regression Curve
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Transverse Regression Curve:HWY 24A, D2, MP 212.9 - 218.0
Year of Last Work: 2000
Pavement Group:Asphalt, Medium Traffic, Cool Climate, Depth 4-6"
Indices
Project IdxValue
Threshold (Idx = 50)
Project Age
Tra
ns
ve
rse
Ind
ex
RSL
27 – 21 = 6
Threshold Age
Current Age
Requirements Site• 5 years worth of data.• St Dev. <10• R2 >= 0.5
RSL: Expert Opinion Curve
0 5 10 15 20 25 300
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Transverse Default Curve:HWY 3A, D1, MP 0.0 - 2.4Year of Last Work: 2009
Pavement Group:Asphalt, Medium Traffic, Cool Climate, Depth <4"
Family Indices
Threshold (Idx = 50)
Project Age
Tra
ns
ve
rse
Ind
ex
RSL
13 – 2 = 11
Threshold Age
Current Age
Requirements• 5 years worth of data.• St Dev. <10• R2 >= 0.5• Engineering Experience
RSL: Why?
RSLs are a way to take detailed data and generalize it for network level pavement management.
RSLs quantify the life expectancy of a given project, which is valuable information that can be used for practical purposes.
RSL: Scope of Calculation
11,000 miles of data collected.– Approximately 3,700 projects (0.5-5.0
Miles in length) Each Project has five distresses.
– Each distress on each project needs a performance curve
200 distinct pavement families– Each pavement family needs a
regression curve for each of the five distresses
RSL & Maintenance
RSL are augmented by one or two years depending upon the type and timeframe of recent maintenance activities.
The Pavement Management Program is currently investigating more efficient ways to account for preventive maintenance efforts.
Pavement Management Inputs/Processing/Outputs
Pavement Management Models
Regional Project Inventories
DTD data (Traffic and Climate Zones)
Roadway Condition Data
Index Equations
Remaining Service Life
Roadway Images and Inventory
Good/Fair/Poor Maps (Current Network Condition)Future 20-Year Network Condition Projections
Project Costs and Benefits
Project Recommendation Lists
Resurfacing Funding Allocations
Maintenance Project Info
CDOT Chief Engineer’s Objectives (Matching Projects)
Project Costs and BenefitsTreatments: Preventive Maintenance
Preventive Maintenance is a category of treatment that includes any thing from crack seals to chip seals to thin overlays (< 2 inches)
Cost: $6.50/yd2
Trigger:– RSL >= 6– AND all distress index values >= 81
Benefit: Ranges from 1 year to 5, based upon traffic
Treatments: Minor Rehabilitation
Minor Rehabilitation includes most treatments that range 2 – 4 inches in depth.
Cost: $30.00/yd2
Trigger:– RSL 2 - 6– AND at least one distress index values
between 61-80 Benefit: Ranges from 7 year to 12,
based upon traffic
Treatments: Major Rehabilitation
Major Rehabilitation includes most treatments greater than 4 inches.
Cost: $41.00/yd2
Trigger:– RSL <= 5– AND at least one distress index values
between 45 - 70 Benefit: Ranges from 13 year to 20,
based upon traffic
Treatments: Reconstruction
Reconstruction is a treatment that replaces the entire surface and supporting structure of a highway.
Cost: $166.50/yd2
Trigger:– RSL = 0– AND at least one distress index <= 50
Benefit: 25 years
Pavement Management Inputs/Processing/Outputs
Pavement Management Models
Regional Project Inventories
DTD data (Traffic and Climate Zones)
Roadway Condition Data
Index Equations
Remaining Service Life
Roadway Images and Inventory
Good/Fair/Poor Maps (Current Network Condition)Future 20-Year Network Condition Projections
Project Costs and Benefits
Project Recommendation Lists
Resurfacing Funding Allocations
Maintenance Project Info
CDOT Chief Engineer’s Objectives (Matching Projects)
Good/Fair/Poor Ratings
Good/Fair/Poor (G/F/P) - The G/F/P designation is a categorization of a pavement’s RSL. A Good pavement section has an RSL greater than or equal to 11 years. A Fair pavement section has an RSL equal to 6 and less than or equal to 10 years. A Poor project has an RSL of 5 years or less. ●Good: RSL >= 11●Fair: RSL >=6 and <=10●Poor: RSL <= 5
G/F/P Map: CDOT Network
G/F/P: CDOT Network
2011 Condition Distribution
●Good: 28% (3,067 miles)
●Fair: 20% (2,167 miles)
●Poor: 18% (2,062 miles)
●Poor-0: 34% (3,691 miles)
20-Year Condition Projection
20112012
20132014
20152016
20172018
20192020
20212022
20232024
20252026
20272028
20292030
20310%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100% 2011 20-Year Good/Fair Projections
~$480 M/YR
~$400 M/YR
~$315 M/YR
2035 Re-source Al-location, ~$274 M/YR
Historical STP In-vestment, ~$197 M/YR
Years
% G
oo
d /
Fai
r C
on
dit
ion
s
Average Annual Budget
Vision
Goal
Resurfacing Funding Allocations
Regional Funding Allocation Equation
5P= the sum of the previous five years of
resurfacing funds for a given Region.
10F = the sum of the predicted ten years of
resurfacing funds for a given Region, as optimized
by the Pavement Management models.
2 X 5P + 10F 20
Resurfacing Funding Allocation
Regional Funding Allocation - Continued
90% of Regional funding is based upon the equation.
10% of Regional funding is allocated based upon miles of RSL=0 roads in the Region.
Project Recommendation
The Pavement Management Program selects the treatment with the greatest benefit at the lowest cost. That treatment is applied at the best possible time in the life of the project.
Traffic is a weighted factor in the benefit that tips the cost-benefit ratio in favor of higher-traveled highways.
Chief Engineer’s Objectives
Regions run their Region-Specific models and generate a list of the most cost effective projects in their Region. This list is used to create the Regions’ 3-year resurfacing plan.
Chief Engineer Objective: 70% of planned resurfacing projects match Pavement Management Recommendations.– Currently achieving 76% match.
Pavement Management Inputs/Processing/Outputs
Pavement Management Models
Regional Project Inventories
DTD data (Traffic and Climate Zones)
Roadway Condition Data
Index Equations
Remaining Service Life
Roadway Images and Inventory
Good/Fair/Poor Maps (Current Network Condition)Future 20-Year Network Condition Projections
Project Costs and Benefits
Project Recommendation Lists
Resurfacing Funding Allocations
Maintenance Project Info
CDOT Chief Engineer’s Objectives (Matching Projects)