Management of Side Effects in DR-TB Patients with Alcohol and Drug Addiction Askar Yedilbayev, MD,...
-
Upload
betty-little -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
2
Transcript of Management of Side Effects in DR-TB Patients with Alcohol and Drug Addiction Askar Yedilbayev, MD,...
Management of Side Effects in DR-TB Patients with Alcohol and Drug
Addiction
Askar Yedilbayev, MD, MPH,Irina Gelmanova, MD, MPH, Natalia Zemlyanaya, MD, PhDPartners In Health
Session N.00245 Best practice in management of side effects among DR-TB patients to improve quality of care
2
Problem statement
• 18.5 liters of alcohol per year per person consumed in Russia;
• 2,9 million people or 2% of population of Russia involved in severe drinking (Ivanets et. al, 2004);– 16% of male and 2.5% of female over 15 years of age suffer
from alcohol-induced disorders;– 27,415 people registered with alcoholism in Tomsk (2011);
• 537,000 people registered with diagnosis of drug addiction (2007, MOH of RF);– Estimated number is around 2.5 million people or 2% of
population of the country;– Average duration of life after diagnosis of drug addiction is 5-7
years;– Incidence of drug addiction in Tomsk was 20.7 per 10,000 people
(2011), 1.5 higher than country average.
3
Current therapy of MDR-TB
4
Substance dependency disorders and tuberculosis
• Increase the risk of certain adverse events during therapy of TB, including hepatotoxicity, peripheral neuropathy, and psychosis;
• May potentially increase the risk of additional adverse events, like electrolyte disturbance, depression, seizure and gastric intolerance, due to overlapping toxicities;
• Associated with worse treatment outcomes:– Deaths from alcohol-related and drug-induced
causes;– Defaults or failure from due to non-adherence and
adverse events.
5
The setting – Tomsk, Russia
6
Drugs in baseline regimens (N=244, Cohort 1, 2000-2002)
N %
H (300 mg, 900 mg biweekly) 5 2.05
E (15-20 mg/kg) 63 25.82
Z (20-30 mg/kg) 178 72.95
KM (1000 mg, 15-20 mg/kg) 114 46.72
CM (1000 mg, 15-20 mg/kg) 154 63.11
AM (1000 mg, 15-20 mg/kg) 2 0.82
FQ (OFX 800 mg, LFX 500 mg) 243 99.59
CS (500-1000 mg) 241 98.77
ETO/PAS (500-1000 mg) 184 75.41
AMX/CLV (1500-2000 mg) 20 8.20
RFB (300 mg) 4 1.64
Adverse reactions among patients being treated for MDR-TB in Tomsk, Russia. IJTLD 11(12):1314-1320, 2007, Shin S. et al.
7
Incidence and characteristics of adverse reactions (N=244, Cohort 1, 2000-2002)
Adverse reactions among patients being treated for MDR-TB in Tomsk, Russia. IJTLD 11(12):1314-1320, 2007, Shin S. et al.
8
Distribution of adverse events by month (N=244, Cohort 1, 2000-2002)
0,0
75,0
150,0
225,0
300,0
0,0 7,5 15,0 22,5 30,0
Histogram of month_all
month_all
Co
un
t
Adverse reactions among patients being treated for MDR-TB in Tomsk, Russia. IJTLD 11(12):1314-1320, 2007, Shin S. et al.
Study population and methods (1)
• 1,344 patients with laboratory confirmed MDR-TB from Tomsk Oblast, Russia;– Enrolled into MDR-TB Program between September 20,
2000 – April 6, 2009;– Some presented data are limited to sub-cohorts: Cohort 1
(2000-2002), Cohort 2 (2002-2004), Cohort 3 and 4 (2005-2009);
• Funding sources: MOH, MOJ, GFATM, PIH;• Three sources for SLD procurement: PIH, GFATM and
MOH;• Inpatient and outpatient model of care;• Patient-centered approach throughout course of
therapy.
9
10
Study population and methods (2)
• Standard procedures for bacteriology and drug susceptibility testing (DST);
• Individualized treatment regimens based on DST and prior history of treatment;
• At least five drugs confirmed to be susceptible or likely to be effective in the regimen;
• Treatment under strict directly observation (DOT) throughout treatment;
• Adverse events diagnosed and managed aggressively at no cost to the patient;– Routine laboratory tests performed and pre-established thresholds for
laboratory-defined AE;
• All TB physicians trained using standardized protocols for diagnosis and management of AE associated with the use of TB drugs.
Study population and methods (3)
• 790 (58.8%) - diagnosed with substance addiction:– 626 (79.2%) with alcohol addiction;– 78 (9.8%) with drug addiction;– 86 (10.8%) with alcohol and drug addiction;
• Confirmation of alcohol/drug addiction by initiation of MDR-TB therapy:– Alcohol addiction:
• 47% by psychiatrist;• 26% by TB doctors (registered in TB database);
– Drug addiction:• 40% by psychiatrist;• 32% by TB doctors (registered in TB database)
11
12
Confirmation of addiction
• Baseline Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) or use during treatment:– Documented diagnosis of alcoholism at intake by TB
physician or mental health provider (e.g. psychiatrist, psychologist of addiction specialist);
– Physician documenting alcohol consumption and/or inebriation during treatment in patient’s chart;
• Baseline Drug Use Disorder (DUD) or use during treatment:– Documented diagnosis of drug addiction at intake by TB
physician or mental health provider (e.g. psychiatrist, psychologist of addiction specialist);
– Physician documenting consumption of narcotic drugs during treatment in patient’s chart.
13
Baseline characteristics (N=1,344, Cohorts 1-4, 2000-2009)
Patients with diagnosed
addiction (N=790)
Patients without diagnosed
addiction (N=524)N % N % p-value
FemaleMale
143647
18.1% 204320
38.9 <0.001
Age, years, median (IQR) 39 (30-42) 33 (25-48) <0.001
History of incarceration 350 44.3 92 17.6 <0.001
Employed at time of treatment 89 11.3 145 27.7 <0.001
Homeless 61 7.9 8 1.6 <0.001
HIV 15 2.0 2 0.4 0.013
Low BMI 354 44.8 186 35.5 <0.001
Bilateral and cavitary disease 478 61.1 225 43.7 <0.001
XDR-TB 42 5.3 29 5.5 0.860
14
Drugs in baseline regimens (N=407, Cohorts 1 and 2, 2000-2004)
Drinkers (N=253) Non-drinkers (N154) p-value
OFX 249 (98.4%) 150 (97.4%) 0.47
CS 248 (98.0%) 150 (97.4%) 0.68
PAS 224 (88.5%) 127 (82.4%) 0.09
Z 207 (81.8%) 118 (76.6%) 0.21
ETO/PTO 206 (81.8%) 125 (81.2%) 0.28
CM 157 (62.1%) 84 (54.5%) 0.13
KM 90 (35.6%) 65 (42.2%) 0.18
E 71 (28.1%) 42 (27.3%) 0.8
AMX/CLV 8 (3.2%) 8 (5.2%) 0.31
RFB 2 (0.7%) 2 (1.3%) 0.61
H 2 (0.7%) 4 (2.6%) 0.18
MFX 1 (0.4%) 2 (1.3%) 0.3
AM 0 2 (1.3%) 0.07
15
Definitions of adverse events (1)
Adverse reaction Definition of specific adverse reaction
Nausea and vomiting
Documentation of nausea and vomiting by physician
Diarrhea Documentation of diarrhea by physician
Depression As diagnosed by a TB physician and/or as judged by psychiatrist, based on ICD-10 criteria
Psychosis As diagnosed by a TB physician and/or as judged by psychiatrist, based on ICD-10 criteria
Seizure Witnessed or unwitnessed event consistent with seizure
Arthralgia Joint pain as reported by patient and documented by physician, with or without presence of arthritis
Rush Dermatological reaction felt to be related to anti-TB medicines, as documented by physician
16
Definitions of adverse events (2)
Adverse reaction Definition of specific adverse reaction
Neuropathy Symptoms and signs consistent with neuropathy, as diagnosed by physician or electomyography
Nephrotoxicity Elevation of at least one creatinine value >141 mmol/l
Hepatotoxicity Elevation of serum bilirubin at least 3 times ULN 20.5 mmol/l
Elevation of transaminases
Elevation of serum transaminases at least 3 times ULN (AST/ALT ULN 0.45-0.68 mmol/l, depending on technique)
Hypokalemia At least one serum potassium value of <3 mEq/l
Hypothyroidism At least one measure of TSH >10.0 IU/ml
Myalgia Symptoms and signs consistent with myalgia, as diagnosed by physician or electromyography
Ototoxicity Hearing loss or шум в ушах, as documented by TB physician and/or by ENT physician.
17
Frequency of adverse events (N=1,344, Cohorts 1-4, 2000-2009) (1)
Patients with diagnosed
addiction (790)
Patients without diagnosed
addiction (524)N % N % p-value
Any adverse effect 729 92.3 486 92.7 0.757
Nausea and vomiting 397 50.3 326 62.2 <0.001
Diarrhea 179 22.7 185 35.3 <0.001
Depression 56 7.1 45 8.6 0.321
Psychosis 47 5.9 27 5.2 0.520
Seizure 74 9.4 31 5.9 0.023
Arthralgia 307 38.9 198 37.8 0.695
Rush 68 8.6 66 12.6 0.021
Neuropathy 43 5.4 18 3.4 0.089
18
Frequency of adverse events (N=1,344, Cohorts 1-4, 2000-2009) (2)
Patients with diagnosed
addiction (790)
Patients without diagnosed
addiction (524)N % N % p-value
Nephrotoxicity 121 15.3 96 18.3 0.153
Hypothyroidism 126 15.9 91 17.4 0.498
Hypokalemia 180 22.8 122 23.3 0.832
Hepatitis 64 8.1 39 7.4 0.669
Elevation of transaminases 446 56.5 242 46.2 <0.001
Myalgia 77 9.7 51 9.7 0.997
Severe allergy 5 0.6 5 1.0 0.527
Pruritus (itching) 198 25.1 135 25.8 0.774
Ototoxicity 86 10.9 65 12.4 0.399
19
Management of adverse events (N=579 with AUD and DUD, Cohorts 3-4, 2004-2009)
Total N of patients with
AE
Symptomatic therapy
Temporary withdrawal of
drug
Permanent withdrawal of
drugNausea and vomiting
283 220 (77.7%) 25 (8.8%) 33 (11.7%)
Diarrhea 109 86 (78.9%) 6 (5.5%) 13 (11.9%)
Depression 39 29 (74.4%) 3 (7.7%) 5 (12.8%)
Psychosis 29 4 (13.8%) 17 (58.6%) 7 (24.1%)
Seizure 46 32 (69.6%) 11 (23.9%) 3 (6.5%)
Arthralgia 214 180 (84.1%) 9 (4.2%) 13 (6.1%)
Rush 41 36 (87.8%) 5 (12.2%) 0
Neuropathy 25 21 (84.0%) 2 (8.0%) 0
Hepatitis 37 14 (37.8%) 8 (21.6%) 2 (5.4%)
Elevation of transaminases
317 248 (78.2%) 21 (6.6%) 6 (1.9%)
20
Management of adverse events (N=579 with AUD and DUD, Cohorts 3-4, 2002-2009)
Total N of patients with
AE
Discontinuation of treatment
Dose decrease or intermittent
TX
No therapy
Nausea and vomiting
283 0 1 (0.4%) 4 (1.4%)
Diarrhea 109 0 0 3 (2.8%)
Depression 39 1 (2.6%) 1 (2.6%) 0
Psychosis 29 0 1 (3.4%) 0
Seizure 46 0 0 0
Arthralgia 214 0 2 (0.9%) 10 (4.7%)
Rush 41 0 0 0
Neuropathy 25 0 0 2 (8.0%)
Hepatitis 37 0 0 10 (27%)
Elevation of transaminases
317 0 1 (0.3%) 36 (11.4%)
21
Treatment outcomes (N=1,344, Cohorts 1-4, 2000-2009)
Patients with diagnosed addiction
Patients without diagnosed addiction
N % N % p-value
Cured + Treatment completed 431 54.6 367 70.0 <0.001
Died 71 9.0 27 5.2 0.009
Lost to follow-up 164 20.8 61 11.6 <0.001
Failure 113 14.3 57 10.9 0.069
Treatment stopped due to SE 3 0.4 5 1.0 0.342
Treatment stopped due to comorbidities
2 0.3 6 1.1 0.097
Other 6 0.8 1 0.2 0.319
TOTAL 790 524
22
Conclusions
• Alcohol use and/or drug addiction pose challenges for successful MDR-TB treatment, including the potential for additional adverse events;
• Alcohol use and/or drug addiction during treatment was not associated with increased risk or number of majority of adverse events during MDR-TB therapy;
• The majority of adverse events are not severe and can be managed without discontinuation of therapy;
• Interventions to diagnose and aggressively manage adverse events during MDR-TB treatment in patients with AUD and DUD could result in better treatment outcomes.
23
References
1. Adverse reactions among patients being treated for MDR-TB in Tomsk, Russia. IJTLD 11(12):1314-1320, 2007, Shin S. et al.
2. Alcohol use and the management of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Tomsk, Russian Federation. IJTLD 16(7): 891-896, Miller A. et. al.
3. Integration of alcohol use disorders identification and management in the tuberculosis programme in Tomsk Oblast, Russia. Eur J Public Health, 2009; 19: 16-18