MAMS Report Card

7/28/2019 MAMS Report Card

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mams-report-card 1/14

School Report Card

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

District

School

School Report Card

Report cards are an important source o inormation about school

perormance and accountability. They allow schools to compare

data in a consistent way and highlight opportunities or

improvement.

This report card will show not only the achievement o students

overall, but also the progress that disaggregated groups are

making in closing achievement gaps. Report card data help

Pennsylvania school districts and the Pennsylvania Department

o Education ocus on specifc groups o students who are currently

not meeting academic standards.

The report card is designed to ensure that the public is ully

inormed about perormance, and to promote broader

participation and better decision‑making by providing a

shared source o perormance data. This ederal initiative is based

on the idea that a well‑inormed public plays an important part

in school improvement.

Using Report Card Data

Report cards should be used to share information. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is notmeasured by the strength of this report card. The data on this report card may not match

AYP data published for this school.

For more information:Pennsylvania Department of EducationBureau of Assessment and Accountability333 Market StreetHarrisburg, PA 17126Voice (717) 705–2343ra‑[email protected]

This report contains:

• Attendance data

Attendance rates are displayed for the most

recent school year.

• TheAccountability Report This section shows the school’s performance

compared with the goals set by No Child Left

Behind. Student results from the Pennsylvania

System of School Assessment (PSSA), PSSA‑M,and PASA are listed by disaggregated group

and by Performance Level.

• TheAssessment Report Here you can compare two years of PSSA, PSSA‑

and PASA academic performance and participati

data for this school. These results are displayed

by grade, subject, and disaggregated group.

• Teacher Qualications This section includes both numbers and percenta

of teachers in the school who are highly qualiedhold emergency certication.

District AYP Status:

School AYP Status:

Attendance data

Attendance rates are displayed for the most

recent school year.

2011-2012

MIDDLETOWN AREA SD

MIDDLETOWN AREA MIDDLE SCHOOL

Warning

Warning



Attendance Data

Pennsylvania’s accountability system includes school assessment based onattendance rates. Attendance rates measure the number of days that astudent was both enrolled and present in the school. Research shows thata strong relationship exists between regular attendance and academic

performance.

Attendance Measure1

Attendance Goal: 90%

All Student Groups2

All Students

— Indicates 10 or fewer students in a group. To provide meaningful results and to protectthe privacy of individual students, data are printed only when the total number of studentsin a group is greater than 10.

1 Attendance measure is a goal of 90%, or any improvement from last year.2 There can be overlap among the groups since a student may belong to more than one of these groups.

Male

Female

White

Black

Latino/Hispanic

Asian

Native American

Multiracial

IEP

English Language Learners

Migrant

Economically Disadvantaged

District StateSchool

Attendance Measures

—

—

—

—

94%

94%

94%

94%

95%

94%

—

—

93%

93%

—

—

93%

94%

94%

94%

94%

93%

93%

97%

—

94%

92%

93%

—

93%

94%

94%

94%

95%

91%

92%

96%

93%

94%

93%

93%

94%

92%

District MIDDLETOWN AREA SD

School MIDDLETOWN AREA MIDDLE SCHOOL



Accountability Report

The purpose of this section of the report card is to show how students performed compared with the goals of No Child Left Behind. Theparticipation tables in this report include students who were enrolled in this school for any part of the academic year. The performancetables in this report include students who were enrolled in this school for a full academic year. These numbers may not match the resultsin the Assessment section of the Report Card.

This table captures participation and performance results of students overall and by disaggregated group who took the PSSA, PSSA‑M,and PASA in

NOTE:

Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.— Indicates 10 or fewer students in a group. To provide meaningful results and to protect the privacy of individual students, data

are printed only when the total number of students in a group is greater than 10.1 There can be overlap among the groups since a student may belong to more than one of these groups.2 The performance of students scoring procient and above includes those who took the PASA, although the number of procient and

advanced scores based on the PASA will not exceed 1% of all assessed students. The performance of students scoring procient and above includes those who took the PSSA-M, although the number of procient

and advanced scores based on the PSSA-M will not exceed 2% of all assessed students.

All Student2

Male

Female

White

Black

Latino/Hispanic

Asian

Native American

Multiracial

IEP


Migrant


All Student Groups1

0 20 40 60 80 100Below Basic Basic Procient Advanced

Percentage of studentsProcient and above

Students Assessed# %

Percentage of students ineach Performance Level

Participation Performance

2012 Goal 78%

School Overall Results in Mathematics



Grades 6-8.

555 100% 6% 11% 29% 53% 83%

284 100% 10% 9% 30% 52% 82%

271 100% 2% 14% 29% 54% 84%

414 100% 4% 10% 28% 58% 86%

35 100% 26% 14% 40% 20% 60%

47 100% 7% 17% 29% 48% 76%

— — — — — —

— — — — — —

47 100% 9% 13% 33% 44% 78%

99 100% 20% 28% 31% 21% 52%

— — — — — —

— — — — — —

226 100% 11% 14% 36% 38% 75%



Accountability Report

The purpose of this section of the report card is to show how students performed compared with the goals of No Child Left Behind. Theparticipation tables in this report include students who were enrolled in this school for any part of the academic year. The performancetables in this report include students who were enrolled in this school for a full academic year. These numbers may not match the resultsin the Assessment section of the Report Card.

This table captures participation and performance results of students overall and by disaggregated group who took the PSSA, PSSA‑M,and PASA in

NOTE:

Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.— Indicates 10 or fewer students in a group. To provide meaningful results and to protect the privacy of individual students, data

are printed only when the total number of students in a group is greater than 10.1 There can be overlap among the groups since a student may belong to more than one of these groups.2 The performance of students scoring procient and above includes those who took the PASA, although the number of procient and

advanced scores based on the PASA will not exceed 1% of all assessed students. The performance of students scoring procient and above includes those who took the PSSA-M, although the number of procient

and advanced scores based on the PSSA-M will not exceed 2% of all assessed students.

All Student2

Male

Female

White

Black

Latino/Hispanic

Asian

Native American

Multiracial

IEP


Migrant


All Student Groups1

0 20 40 60 80 100Below Basic Basic Procient Advanced


Students Assessed# %


Participation Performance

2012 Goal 81%

School Overall Results in Reading



Grades 6-8.

555 100% 11% 18% 35% 36% 70%

284 100% 13% 22% 36% 29% 65%

271 100% 9% 15% 33% 43% 76%

414 100% 9% 18% 35% 38% 73%

35 100% 31% 17% 31% 20% 51%

47 100% 7% 29% 31% 33% 64%

— — — — — —

— — — — — —

47 100% 16% 18% 40% 27% 67%

99 100% 33% 33% 25% 9% 35%

— — — — — —

— — — — — —

226 100% 17% 21% 37% 24% 62%



NOTE:Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.This table reects all students enrolled for any portion of the academic year, meaning that these numbers may not match the results

reported for Accountability purposes.— Indicates 10 or fewer students in a group. To provide meaningful results and to protect

the privacy of individual students, data are printed only when the total number of studentsin a group is greater than 10.

1 There can be overlap among the groups since a student may belong to more than one of these groups.

Assessment Report


All Students


Male

Female

White

Black

Latino/Hispanic

Asian

Native American

Multiracial

IEP


Migrant


Student Group1 AcademicYear

2011–20122010–2011

0 20 40 60 80 100

ParticipationRate

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–2012

2010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

B as ic Pro ci ent A dv an ce dBelow Basic

School District State



The purpose of this section of the report card is to show how students performed on the PSSA over the past two years in Mathematics,Reading, and Science. This data table captures this school’s overall performance results and participation rates by disaggregated group ancompares it to this school’s results in the previous year. The table reflects all students taking the PSSA in Grades 3-8 and 11 who were in school for any part of the academic year.

School PSSA Results in Grade 6 Mathematics

100% 5% 12% 31% 52% 83% 77%83%

99% 6% 9% 31% 54% 85% 78%85%

100% 9% 7% 31% 52% 84% 76%84%

100% 9% 6% 33% 52% 85% 77%85%

100% 1% 16% 31% 52% 82% 78%82%

99% 3% 12% 29% 56% 86% 79%86%

100% 3% 10% 30% 57% 87% 83%87%

99% 8% 5% 30% 57% 87% 84%87%

100% 36% 18% 27% 18% 45% 53%45%

100% 0% 29% 36% 36% 71% 59%71%

100% 0% 11% 39% 50% 89% 58%89%

100% 0% 0% 42% 58% 100% 60%100%

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

100% 0% 22% 33% 44% 78% 72%78%

— — — — — — —100% 17% 35% 30% 17% 48% 43%48%

95% 24% 19% 29% 29% 57% 45%57%

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

100% 13% 14% 34% 39% 73% 62%73%

99% 7% 15% 40% 38% 78% 65%78%







Assessment Report


All Students


Male

Female

White

Black

Latino/Hispanic

Asian

Native American

Multiracial

IEP


Migrant



2011–20122010–2011

0 20 40 60 80 100

ParticipationRate

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–2012

2010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011





School PSSA Results in Grade 6 Reading

100% 13% 22% 36% 29% 65% 68%65%

99% 10% 24% 35% 31% 65% 70%65%

100% 13% 26% 38% 23% 62% 64%62%

100% 14% 19% 39% 27% 67% 67%67%

100% 13% 18% 34% 35% 69% 73%69%

99% 6% 29% 29% 35% 64% 73%64%

100% 10% 23% 34% 34% 67% 76%67%

99% 9% 23% 34% 34% 69% 77%69%

100% 55% 0% 36% 9% 45% 43%45%

100% 15% 46% 31% 8% 38% 46%38%

100% 0% 28% 39% 33% 72% 44%72%

100% 17% 25% 33% 25% 58% 44%58%

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

100% 10% 25% 55% 10% 65% 62%65%

— — — — — — —100% 48% 43% 9% 0% 9% 30%9%

95% 21% 42% 21% 16% 37% 32%37%

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

100% 22% 21% 36% 21% 57% 51%57%

99% 17% 32% 32% 20% 52% 52%52%







Assessment Report


All Students


Male

Female

White

Black

Latino/Hispanic

Asian

Native American

Multiracial

IEP


Migrant



2011–20122010–2011

0 20 40 60 80 100

ParticipationRate

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–2012

2010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011






100% 6% 8% 29% 57% 86% 80%86%

100% 9% 12% 30% 49% 78% 78%79%

100% 8% 6% 28% 58% 85% 78%86%

100% 9% 16% 32% 44% 76% 77%76%

100% 4% 10% 30% 56% 86% 81%86%

100% 9% 9% 29% 54% 82% 79%82%

100% 3% 6% 27% 63% 90% 86%90%

100% 6% 14% 28% 52% 80% 84%81%

— — — — — — —

100% 33% 0% 50% 17% 67% 58%67%

100% 21% 7% 21% 50% 71% 60%71%

100% 14% 21% 29% 36% 64% 59%64%

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

100% 13% 19% 25% 44% 69% 72%69%

— — — — — — —100% 33% 8% 29% 29% 56% 45%58%

100% 26% 35% 26% 13% 38% 42%39%

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

100% 10% 10% 43% 38% 81% 66%81%

100% 14% 15% 39% 32% 70% 65%71%







Assessment Report


All Students


Male

Female

White

Black

Latino/Hispanic

Asian

Native American

Multiracial

IEP


Migrant



2011–20122010–2011

0 20 40 60 80 100

ParticipationRate

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–2012

2010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011






100% 10% 15% 39% 35% 74% 76%75%

98% 11% 23% 32% 34% 66% 76%66%

100% 14% 15% 40% 31% 70% 72%71%

100% 14% 30% 32% 24% 56% 71%56%

100% 6% 15% 39% 39% 78% 80%78%

97% 9% 15% 32% 44% 76% 80%76%

100% 9% 12% 42% 37% 79% 82%79%

99% 10% 22% 31% 37% 68% 82%68%

— — — — — — —

100% 15% 31% 46% 8% 54% 56%54%

100% 0% 31% 31% 38% 69% 55%69%

100% 7% 36% 43% 14% 57% 55%57%

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

100% 31% 13% 25% 31% 56% 71%56%

— — — — — — —100% 38% 24% 19% 19% 36% 37%38%

96% 22% 48% 19% 11% 32% 36%30%

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

100% 13% 19% 42% 26% 68% 60%68%

96% 13% 34% 39% 14% 54% 60%54%







Assessment Report


All Students


Male

Female

White

Black

Latino/Hispanic

Asian

Native American

Multiracial

IEP


Migrant



2011–20122010–2011

0 20 40 60 80 100

ParticipationRate

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–2012

2010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011






99% 8% 10% 30% 53% 82% 76%82%

99% 6% 14% 30% 51% 80% 76%81%

99% 11% 11% 28% 50% 78% 74%78%

100% 8% 8% 33% 52% 84% 76%85%

100% 4% 9% 32% 55% 86% 77%87%

99% 4% 20% 27% 49% 76% 77%76%

99% 5% 8% 30% 56% 86% 82%86%

99% 3% 11% 29% 57% 86% 83%86%

100% 29% 14% 36% 21% 57% 54%57%

100% 25% 13% 44% 19% 63% 55%63%

100% 0% 23% 31% 46% 77% 56%77%

100% 9% 18% 27% 45% 73% 56%73%

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

100% 18% 0% 36% 45% 82% 69%82%

— — — — — — —100% 21% 29% 32% 18% 50% 37%50%

100% 19% 50% 25% 6% 29% 40%31%

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

99% 16% 13% 34% 37% 71% 61%71%

100% 15% 18% 38% 30% 66% 61%67%







Assessment Report


All Students


Male

Female

White

Black

Latino/Hispanic

Asian

Native American

Multiracial

IEP


Migrant



2011–20122010–2011

0 20 40 60 80 100

ParticipationRate

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–2012

2010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011






99% 10% 17% 28% 45% 73% 79%73%

99% 6% 8% 30% 56% 86% 81%86%

99% 12% 24% 29% 35% 64% 75%64%

100% 9% 11% 32% 48% 79% 77%80%

100% 8% 9% 28% 54% 82% 84%82%

99% 3% 4% 28% 65% 93% 85%93%

99% 7% 17% 30% 47% 77% 85%76%

99% 5% 4% 25% 66% 90% 87%91%

100% 29% 14% 21% 36% 57% 61%57%

100% 13% 19% 56% 13% 69% 64%69%

100% 23% 15% 31% 31% 62% 60%62%

100% 9% 18% 36% 36% 73% 60%73%

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

100% 0% 18% 27% 55% 82% 76%82%

— — — — — — —100% 28% 38% 21% 14% 39% 40%34%

100% 19% 19% 63% 0% 59% 45%63%

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

99% 14% 22% 33% 30% 65% 65%64%

100% 11% 13% 34% 41% 74% 67%75%







Assessment Report


All Students


Male

Female

White

Black

Latino/Hispanic

Asian

Native American

Multiracial

IEP


Migrant



2011–20122010–2011

0 20 40 60 80 100

ParticipationRate

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–2012

2010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011





School PSSA Results in Grade 8 Science

99% 26% 23% 31% 21% 51% 59%51%

99% 23% 21% 34% 22% 56% 58%56%

99% 31% 19% 30% 20% 50% 61%50%

99% 23% 19% 31% 27% 57% 59%58%

100% 21% 27% 31% 21% 52% 57%52%

100% 23% 23% 38% 16% 54% 57%54%

99% 18% 24% 34% 23% 57% 69%58%

100% 18% 18% 38% 26% 63% 67%64%

100% 64% 29% 0% 7% 7% 26%7%

94% 47% 27% 27% 0% 27% 27%27%

100% 42% 25% 25% 8% 33% 30%33%

100% 31% 38% 23% 8% 31% 28%31%

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

100% 36% 9% 36% 18% 55% 50%55%

— — — — — — —100% 48% 30% 11% 11% 23% 24%22%

100% 68% 21% 11% 0% 10% 23%11%

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

99% 44% 23% 27% 6% 33% 38%33%

98% 35% 24% 35% 5% 40% 36%40%







Assessment Report


All Students


Male

Female

White

Black

Latino/Hispanic

Asian

Native American

Multiracial

IEP


Migrant



2011–20122010–2011

0 20 40 60 80 100

ParticipationRate

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–2012

2010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011





The purpose of this section of the report card is to show how students performed on the PSSA-M during the past two years in MathematicReading, and Science. This data table captures this school’s overall performance results and participation rates by disaggregatedgroup. The table reflects all students taking the PSSA-M in Grades 4-8 and 11 who were in this school for any part of the academic year.

School PSSA-M Results in Grade 7 Mathematics

— — — — — — —

100% 0% 50% 50% 0% 50% 41%50%

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —— — — — — — —

100% 0% 50% 50% 0% 50% 41%50%

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —

— — — — — — —







Assessment Report


All Students


Male

Female

White

Black

Latino/Hispanic

Asian

Native American

Multiracial

IEP


Migrant



2011–20122010–2011

0 20 40 60 80 100

ParticipationRate

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–2012

2010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011

2011–20122010–2011


State



The Pennsylvania Alternate System of Assessment (PASA) uses performance tasks to measure the knowledge and skills of students withsignificant cognitive disabilities. As with the Pennsylvania System of School Assessment (PSSA), the purpose of the PASA is to provideinformation to school districts and other educational service providers that will help them improve instruction for students with the mostsevere cognitive disabilities.

School PASA Results

This school had no PASA data available in grades 3-8 or 11 to evaluate Assessment results.



Teacher Qualications

Professional Qualications of Teachers

No Child Left Behind requires that all public school teachers in core academic subjects be Highly Qualied.Teachers are generally required to be fully certied and to demonstrate their knowledge.

In Pennsylvania, a Highly Qualied teacher is one who: (1) holds full certication, (2) has at least a bachelor’sdegree, (3) has completed a content area major, (4) has passed a content area test, and (5) has completedteacher education coursework.

NOTES:1 Includes classroom teachers only.2 Includes all professionals, not just classroom teachers.

Percentage

Course Assignments with Non‑Highly Qualied Teachers1

High Poverty

Low Poverty

Teachers with Emergency Certication2

High Poverty

Low Poverty

Number

0 0%0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%



MAMS Report Card

Documents

Transcript of MAMS Report Card