Malaysian Education System

14
1.0 Overview of Malaysian Education System Malaysia occupies the southernmost peninsular of Southeast Asia and the northern one-third of Borneo. It became a nation on September 16, 1963 when Sabah and Sarawak joined Malaysia which had earlier gained independence from the British on August 31, 1957 to form a single federation. Malaysia has a democratically elected Government with a constitution monarch. Malaysia has a multi-ethnic population with overall of population of 28.3 million; Peninsular Malaysia – 22.6 million, Sabah – 3.2 million, and Sarawak – 2.5 million. Malaysian education history start before the independent of the nation, the education prior to independence 1786-1957 were when the British encouraged mass immigration of workers from China and India to work in the tin mines and rubber plantations respectively. Furthermore, rapid urban development took place during the blooming colonial economy. The Malays remained in rural areas, urban areas were dominated by the Chinese and a minority of Indians who eventually controlled commerce and industry. The schools were established by British colonial government, Moslem and Christian’s missionaries and Ethnic communities (Chinese, Malays, and Indians). The types of school is divided by English schools, Vernacular schools, Malays, Chinese, Tamil and Islamic. Moreover, common features of schools is different curriculum, different examinations, different

description

an overview of malaysian education system.

Transcript of Malaysian Education System

Page 1: Malaysian Education System

1.0 Overview of Malaysian Education System

Malaysia occupies the southernmost peninsular of Southeast Asia and the

northern one-third of Borneo. It became a nation on September 16, 1963 when Sabah

and Sarawak joined Malaysia which had earlier gained independence from the British

on August 31, 1957 to form a single federation. Malaysia has a democratically elected

Government with a constitution monarch. Malaysia has a multi-ethnic population with

overall of population of 28.3 million; Peninsular Malaysia – 22.6 million, Sabah – 3.2

million, and Sarawak – 2.5 million.

Malaysian education history start before the independent of the nation, the

education prior to independence 1786-1957 were when the British encouraged mass

immigration of workers from China and India to work in the tin mines and rubber

plantations respectively. Furthermore, rapid urban development took place during the

blooming colonial economy. The Malays remained in rural areas, urban areas were

dominated by the Chinese and a minority of Indians who eventually controlled

commerce and industry. The schools were established by British colonial government,

Moslem and Christian’s missionaries and Ethnic communities (Chinese, Malays, and

Indians). The types of school is divided by English schools, Vernacular schools, Malays,

Chinese, Tamil and Islamic. Moreover, common features of schools is different

curriculum, different examinations, different language of instruction, different education

philosophy and orientation, and decentralized (governance & finance).

Things are different after independence. Educations are more enhanced rather

than the past. There are no different schools, learning. Now, Malaysia has many

different schools such as; Sekolah Kebangsaan, Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina-

SJK(c), and Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Tamil – SJK (t). Even though the schools are

different, but they learning the same thing. Same education, same methods, same

technologies. Now, educations are under control from Kementerian Pendidikan

Malaysia (Ministry of Education).

Page 2: Malaysian Education System

2.0 National Education System (Malaysia)

The education system were started with pre-school, primary, lower secondary,

upper secondary, post-secondary and higher education. In include government aided

and private schools or education institutions-exception: expatriate & international

schools. National education philosophy is the education in Malaysia is an on-going effort

towards further developing the potential of individuals in a holistic and integrated

manner so as to produce individuals who are intellectually, spiritually, emotionally and

physically balanced and harmonious, based on a firm belief in and devotion to God.

Such an effort is designed to produce Malaysian citizens who are knowledgeable and

competent, who possess high moral standards, and who are responsible and capable of

achieving high level of personal well-being as well as being able to contribute to the

betterment of the family, the society and the nation at large.

There were several objectives of national education which is; to produce a loyal

and united Malaysian nation, to produce faithful, well-mannered, knowledgeable,

competent and prosperous individuals, to produce the nation’s human resource for

development needs, and to provide educational opportunities for all Malaysians.

2.1 Features of National Education System

National unity

National Language as main medium of instruction (Mandarin in Chinese

primary, Tamil in Indian primary schools)

Common curriculum

Common examination

National education philosophy

Centralized (governance and finance for government institutions)

Page 3: Malaysian Education System

2.2 Flow of Education System in Malaysia

Page 4: Malaysian Education System

3.0 Development and Formation of National Education System

The Malaysian education system were develop and formulate through several

report which have been chosen. It comprises Barnes Report (1951a), Fenn-Wu Report

(1957b), Razak Report (1957), Rahman Talib (1961), Cabinet Report (1979), and

Private Higher Education Act 1996.

3.1 Barnes Report (1951a)

A decade before the end of the British rule, the educational system in Malaya

was reorganized along the lines of the Barnes Report of 1951. Up to that point of time,

Malaya's educational system lacked uniformity in curriculum and an articulated rationale

for a policy which would be relevant to the political and socio-economic goals of the

people. The country's three principal ethnic communities—Malays, Chinese and Indians

(mostly Tamils from South India)—ran their own schools, the latter two often importing a

syllabus used in the countries of their origin. The Barnes Report recommended a

national school system, which would provide primary education for 6 years in Malaya

and English, hoping that over a period of time, the attraction to have separate schools in

Chinese and Tamil would wane and disappear. The reaction of the Chinese community

to the Barnes Report was not totally positive. While the community agreed with the

basic recommendation that Malay be treated as the principal language, it felt that there

should be some provision to recognize Chinese and Tamil as important components of

a new definition of Malaya's national identity.

Partly to pacify the ethnic sensitivities, the colonial government approved a

modified formula that would allow bilingualism in Malay schools (Malay and English)

and three language "solution" in Tamil and Chinese schools (either Tamil-Malay-English

or Chinese-Malay-English). It recommended a common curriculum for all schools,

hoping that a national school system would evolve. In 1955, two years before Malaya's

independence, the Razak Report endorsed the concept of a national education system

based on Malay (the national language), being the main medium of instruction. A key

Page 5: Malaysian Education System

paragraph from it was reproduced in Section 3 of the Education Ordinance of 1957: A

national system of education acceptable to the people of the Federation [of Malaya] as

a whole which will satisfy their needs and promote their cultural, social, economic and

political development as a nation, having regard to the intention to make Malay the

national language of the country while preserving and sustaining the growth of the

language and culture of other communities living in the country.

3.2 Fenn-Wu Report (1957b)

Earlier in January 1951, two educationists, William P. Fenn, then associate

executive secretary of the board of trustees of a number of institutions of higher learning

in China, and Wu Teh-yao, then an official with the United Nations, were invited by the

federal government to conduct a study of Chinese schools in Malaya. The study aimed

to make recommendations that would lead to “a greater contribution by Chinese schools

in Malaya to the goal of an independent Malayan nation composed of people of many

races but having a common loyalty”. Some of the recommendation made by The Fenn-

Wu Report were:

vernacular schools continue to exist

Trilingualism in Chinese Malayans, with Malay as the official language,

English as the business language, and Chinese as the cultural language

an increase in government subsidies

formation of a committee to look into existing problems in schools;

formation of a committee to produce textbooks based on modern

pedagogical methods, with Malaya as the focus, while preserving Chinese

culture and tradition;

establishment of an institution to produce more qualified teachers

And an improvement in the terms of service of Chinese school teachers.

Overall, the report supported the idea of constructing a national community that would

preserve existing multiculturalism.

Page 6: Malaysian Education System

The Central Advisory Committee on Education, Federation of Malaya, reviewed

both the Fenn-Wu report and the Report on Malay Education in Malaya (1951 or Barnes

Report) and made known their findings in a publication titled Report on the Barnes

Report on Malay Education and the Fenn-Wu Report on Chinese Education on 10

September 1951. This report led to the enactment of the Education Ordinance of 1952,

which largely incorporated the Barnes report’s recommendation of a six-year free

compulsory education for all children aged six to 12, during which both Malay and

English would be taught.

3.3 Razak Report (1957)

The Razak Report is an educational proposal to reform the education system in

Malaya. Put forward in 1956, it was named after the then Education Minister Tun Abdul

Razak. The report was incorporated into Section 3 of the Education Ordinance of 1957

and served as the basis of the educational framework for independent Malaya and,

subsequently, Malaysia. The Razak Report is a compromise between: the Barnes

Report, favored by the Malays, which was formerly passed into law as the Education

Ordinance of 1952, and the Fenn-Wu Report, favored by the Chinese and Indians.

While the Razak Report forwarded the Malay language as the main medium of

instruction, it allows the retention of other language medium schools. In other words, the

national language is to be the main medium of instruction, and not the sole medium.

The Razak Report provides for Malay, English, Chinese, and Tamil schools at the

primary-school level, and Malay and English schools at the secondary-school level.

Malay-medium schools are referred to as "national" schools while other schools are

referred to as "national-type" schools. All schools are government-funded and use a

common national curriculum, regardless of school type. Other provisions include; (1)

Formation of a single system of national education, (2) Commencement of a Malayan-

orientated curriculum, (3) Conception of a single system of evaluation for all, and (4)

Recognition of the eventual objective of making the Malay language (Bahasa Melayu)

as the main medium of instruction.

Page 7: Malaysian Education System

3.4 Rahman Talib (1961)

To speed up the process of national integration and unity, the Rahman Talib’s

Report was made to review the education policy in 1960 and became a basis to

establish the Education Act 1961. The act provides the legal basis for enabling national

language to be a compulsory subject in primary and secondary school and in all training

institutions. In addition, it is a requirement to have a satisfied grade to be awarded a

certificate for public education examination especially at the end and upper secondary

levels. All School using English as the medium of instruction were gradually adopting

National language.

3.5 Cabinet Report (1979)

Education curriculum is the heartbeat of the education system. The primary and

secondary educations have adopted a new curriculum based on the Cabinet Report on

Educational Policy Implementation in 1979 (Mahathir’s Report). It is to realize the

National Education Philosophy and the requirement for the human resource in the

country. The school curriculum are categorized as New Primary School Curriculum

(NPSC) and Integrated Secondary School Curriculum (ISSC) for lower and upper level.

NPSC emphasizes reading, writing and arithmetic skill. They covers the communication

skill; the man and environment; and individual self-development.

NPSC together with ISSC will foster the holistic and integrated development of

individuals in the intellectual, spiritual, emotional and physical aspects towards

producing a balanced, harmonious and responsible citizen. At the lower secondary

level, there are core and additional subjects and divided into such component: Malay,

English, Mathematics, Art, Science, History, Geography, Islamic Religious

Education/Moral Education, Physical and Health Education, and Integrated Living Skills;

and additional subjects are Chinese and Tamil Languages. The Integrated Living Skills

are divided into two sections. First, the core subject comprises three components:

manipulative skills, commerce and entrepreneurship and family life education. Second,

the elective subject also comprises three components: additional manipulative skills,

Page 8: Malaysian Education System

home economics and agriculture. Student will choose one component in the elective

subject.

3.6 Private Higher Education Act 1996

The Private Higher Educational Institutions Act 1996 is a seventy page document

by the Malaysian government that regulates the private tertiary educational institutions

(PHEI’s) and tertiary students. The following important areas are covered by the Act:

regulations pertaining to establishment of a PHEI as a university, University College or

branch campus, registration of the PHEI, management of the PHEI, conduct of courses,

discipline and conduct of tertiary students. Other areas include permits to teach,

revocation and cancellation of a registered tertiary institution, statutory inspection of a

tertiary institution, closing down of an institution, proceedings for investigation of an

institution, offences and penalties for institutions and the Ministers’ powers in

overseeing the operation of PHEI’s.

The important focus will be on how the Private Higher Educational Institutions Act

impacts on the actions of tertiary students. The section on discipline and conduct of

tertiary students will be discussed and the consequences of violation clarified. This will

serve to inform, protect and safeguard tertiary students throughout their duration of

study in Malaysia. This can result in huge cost savings and priceless value addition to

the student who has made the smart decision of benefiting from the “best value”

information and services we provide free to tertiary students. Moreover, prospective

students intending to study in Malaysia can also benefit in being more prepared for

study life in Malaysia.

Page 9: Malaysian Education System

4.0 Development Master Plan

The Education Development Plan for Malaysia (2001-2010), henceforth referred

to as the Blueprint, takes into account the goals and aspirations of the National Vision

Policy to build a resilient nation, encourage the creation of a just society, maintain

sustainable economic growth, develop global competitiveness, build a knowledge-based

economy (K-economy), strengthen human resource development, and maintain

sustainable environment development. The Third Outline Perspective Plan (2001-2010)

and the Eighth Malaysia Plan (2001-2005) outlined the strategies, programs, and

projects to increase the nation’s economic growth towards building a united, just and

equitable society as well as meeting the challenges of globalization and K-economy.

The ultimate aim of these long and medium-terms plans is to build Malaysia into a

developed nation based on its own mound. These plans have great implications on the

national education system.

It comprises Six Strategic Thrusts; (1) Nation Building, (2) Human Capital

Development, (3) Strengthening National Schools, (4) Reducing Education Gap, (5)

Improving the Prestige of the Teaching Profession, (6) Promoting Institutional

Excellence. Furthermore, the higher education were established new plan towards year

2020. This include; (1) Increasing Access and Equity, (2) Improving Teaching and

Learning Quality, (3) Enhancing Research and Innovation, (4) Strengthening Higher

Education Institutions, (5) Increasing Internationalization, (6) Enculturation of lifelong

learning, (7) Strengthening Delivery by Minister of Higher Education.

Page 10: Malaysian Education System

5.0 Repositioning Quality Assurance in Malaysia (MQA)

In 1997 National Accreditation Board (Lembaga Akreditasi Negara, LAN) was

established for Quality Assurance (QA) of programs in the private higher education

sector. In 2002, Quality Assurance (audit) Division (QAD) in the Ministry was setup for

public universities. MQA was established under the Malaysian Qualifications Agency

Act 2007. The merger of LAN and the QAD provides for a common quality assurance

platform. It symbolizes the maturing Malaysian higher education, changing

government’s policies, trends and societal needs and the need to strengthen and

consolidate. Moreover, other bodies playing a very important role higher education is

the Department of Public Service and The Statutory Professional bodies.

The Malaysian Qualifications Agency (MQA) aspires to become a credible and

internationally recognized higher education quality assurance body that inspires the

confidence of its stakeholders through competent, responsible, accountable and

transparent good practices. The main role of the MQA is to be the guardian of the

Malaysian Qualifications Framework (MQF) as a reference point for national

qualifications, and to oversee quality assurance practices and accreditation of national

higher education.