Madison Schools State Report Card 2009
-
Upload
carecommitteepac -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of Madison Schools State Report Card 2009
8/14/2019 Madison Schools State Report Card 2009
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/madison-schools-state-report-card-2009 1/8
To meet a testindicator for grades
3-8 and10, atleast75%of students
tested must score proficientor higher
on that test. Other indicator requirements are:
11th grade Ohio Graduation Tests, 85%; Attendance
Rate, 93%; Graduation Rate, 90%.
StateIndicators
2008-2009 School Year Report Card
The state requirement is 75 percent
The state requirement is 75 percent
The state requirement is 75 percent
The state requirement is 75 percent
The state requirement is 75 percent
The state requirement is 85 percent
The state requirement is 93 percent
The state requirement is 90 percent
3rd Grade Achievement
1. Reading2. Mathematics
4th Grade Achievement
3. Reading
4. Mathematics
5. Writing
5th Grade Achievement
6. Reading
7. Mathematics
8. Science
9. Social Studies
6th Grade Achievement
10. Reading
11. Mathematics
7th Grade Achievement
12. Reading
13. Mathematics
14. Writing
8th Grade Achievement
15. Reading
16. Mathematics
17. Science
18. Social Studies
Ohio Graduation Tests (10th Grade)
19. Reading
20. Mathematics
21. Writing
22. Science23. Social Studies
Ohio Graduation Tests (11th Grade)
24. Reading
25. Mathematics
26. Writing
27. Science
28. Social Studies
Attendance Rate
29. All Grades
2007-08 Graduation Rate
30. District
The state requirement is 75 percent
The state requirement is 75 percent
The six designations are• Excellent with Distinction• Excellent• Effective• Continuous Improvement• Academic Watch• Academic Emergency
Value-AddedAdequateYearly Progress
PerformanceIndex
Indicators
The District Report Card for the2008-2009school year showsthe progress districts have madebased on four measures of performance.
The combination of the fourmeasures is the basis forassigning state designationsto districts, buildings andcommunity schools.
Your District’sDesignation: Number of State
IndicatorsMet out of 30
PerformanceIndex
StateIndicators Performance
Index
Value-AddedMeasure
Your District
2008-2009
Similar Districts
2008-2009
State
2008-2009
Percentage of Students at and above the Proficient Level
On the Web: reportcard.ohio.gov
Value-AddedMeasure
State
Indicators
District Improvement(0-120 points)
AYP
*
**
Any result at or above the state standard is indicated by a .
SimilarDistrictsare basedon comparingdemographic,socioeconomicand geographicfactors. Cumulative resultsfor studentswho tookthe testsas 10th or 11thgraders.***
-- =Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group.
95.7 %
95.0 %
95.6 %
91.8 %
91.7 %
95.5 %
91.4 %
IRN # 047886
Effective25
95.8
Not Met
At Risk
Madison Local School District6741 N Ridge Rd, Madison, OH 44057-2656 - Lake County
Current Superintendent: Roger J. Goudy (440) 428-2166
78.4 %78.4 %
82.5 %
80.5 %89.1 %
80.2 %
66.0 %
66.0 %
69.8 %
81.3 %
76.1 %
84.3 %
80.1 %
79.7 %
85.1 %
81.5 %
71.2 %
62.0 %
91.9 %
89.2 %
93.3 %
81.8 %88.1 %
84.3 %86.5 %
77.4 %81.3 %
87.4 %
84.3 %88.5 %
82 %
78.4 %84.4 %
76.8 %
70.6 %
76.9 %
66.7 %
72 %
62.3 %
70.6 %
61.6 %
81.3 %
75.2 %
87.4 %
83.0 %
76.6 %
74.3 %
80.5 %
82.1 %
82.7 %
84.3 %
72.4 %
70.6 %
62.8 %
51.1 %
76.9 %
78.5 %
70.0 %
55.8 %
84.5 %
81.4 %
89.7 %
76 %81.6 %
88.5 %
87.8 %
92.5 %
83.3 %86.3 %
92.8 %
88.4 %
93.2 %
84.2 %
88.6 %
94.3 %
84.6 %
94.7 %
93.2 %
95.3 %
90.2 %
92.4 %
95.1 %
94.3 %
+ = above
8/14/2019 Madison Schools State Report Card 2009
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/madison-schools-state-report-card-2009 2/8
8/14/2019 Madison Schools State Report Card 2009
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/madison-schools-state-report-card-2009 3/8
Overall CompositeScores reflect grade level and overall composite
ratings for the 2008-2009 school year.
Value-Added Measure
Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8
Reading
Mathematics
On the Web: reportcard.ohio.gov
Your district’s Value-Added rating represents the progress yourdistrict has made with its students since last school year.In contrast, achievement scores represent students’ performance at apoint in time. A score of “Above” indicates greater than one year of
progress has been achieved; “Met” indicates one year of progress has beenachieved; “Below” indicates less than one year of progress has been achieved.
Value-AddedMeasure
-
+ AboveExpected Growth
MetExpected Growth
BelowExpected Growth
=
=
=
Legend
Performance Index
Performance Level Across Grades3-8 and 10 for all Tested Subjects
(Includes every student enrolled in
the district for a full academic year)
X =WeightPercentage Points
Your District’s Performance Index
0.0
0.3
0.6
1.0
1.1
1.2
Untested
Limited
Basic
Proficient
Accelerated
Advanced
X
X
X
X
X
X
=
=
=
=
=
=
The PerformanceIndex reflects theachievementof everystudentenrolled for the full academic
year. The Performance Indexis a weighted average that includesall tested subjects and grades anduntested students. The greatestweight is given to advanced scores(1.2); the weights decrease for eachperformance level and a weight of zero is given to untested students.This results in a scale from 0 to120points. The Performance Index can becompared across years to showdistrict achievement trends.
PerformanceIndex
2008-2009 2007-2008 2006-2007
Performance Index Over Time
0.4
5.2
14.7
37.7
27.2
14.9
1.5
8.8
37.7
29.9
17.9
95.8 95.6 97.6
95.8
Madison Local School District, Lake Coun
+
- + - -
+ + +
0.0
8/14/2019 Madison Schools State Report Card 2009
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/madison-schools-state-report-card-2009 4/8
4
Grades 3-8 and 10
Readingand
Mathematics
Adequate YearlyProgress
A l lS t u d e
n t s
P e r c e n t P r o f i c i e n t
P e r c e n t T e s t e d
E c o n o
m i c a
l l yD i s a d
v a n t a g
e d
A s i a n / P
a c i f i c
I s l a n
d e r
B l a c k
, n o n
- H i s p
a n i c
A m e r i
c a n I n d
i a n / A l
a s k a N a
t i v e
H i s p a
n i c
M u l t i -
R a c i a
l
W h i t e
, n o n
- H i s p
a n i c
S t u d e
n t sw i t h
D i s a b
i l i t i e s
L i m i t e
d E n g l i s h
P r o f i c
i e n t
Reading
Mathematics
Reading
Mathematics
Graduation Rate*
Attendance Rate*
Legend
Not applicable.
NR
N/A
Met
Not Met
Not Required – This indicator was not evaluated for this subgroup because the subgroup size was smaller than the minimum number needed to achieve a statistically
reliable result. 30 students is the minimum size for the proficiency and non-test indicators, while 40 is the minimum size for the participation rate indicators.
This subgroup met AYP for this indicator with its current year, two-year combined, Safe Harbor, or growth measure results.
This subgroup did not meet AYP for this indicator.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
ReadingProficiency:
MathematicsProficiency:
ReadingParticipation:
Mathematics
Participation:
AttendanceRate:
AYP Determinatio
by Indicator
GraduationRate:
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a federally required measure. Everyschooland district must meet AYP goals thatare set for Reading and Mathematics
Rate. These goals are applied to ten student groups: All Students,Economically Disadvantaged Students, Asian/Pacific IslanderStudents, Black, non-Hispanic Students, American Indian/AlaskaNative Students, Hispanic Students, Multi-Racial Students, White,
non-Hispanic Students, Students with Disabilities (IEP), and Students withLimited English Proficiency (LEP). If any one of these groups does not meet
Rate, or Graduation Rate, then the school or district does not meet AYP.Not meeting AYP for consecutive years will have both federal and stateconsequences. Federal consequences could include a school or district beingidentified for improvement. State consequences could include a reductionin the state’s rating designation.
AYP
AYP Determination
by Subgroup
AYPDetermination
for Your District:
This legend explains terms used in the above chart that describe whether each student group met this year’s AYP goals.
For test indicators, AYP can be met in one of four ways:
1) meeting the AYP targets with current year results;
2) meeting the AYP targets with two-year combined results;
3) meeting the improvement requirements of Safe Harbor;
4) meeting the AYP targets with projected results.
For non-test indicators, AYP can be met in one of three ways:
1) meeting the AYP targets with current year results;
2) meeting the AYP targets with two-year combined results;
3) making improvement over the previous year.
* The non-test indicators used for overall AYP (Attendance Rate and Graduation Rate)are evaluated only for the All Students subgroup.
Black,non-Hispanic
HispanicWhite,
non-Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
American Indian/ Alaska Native
Econ.Disadvtgd
Limited EnglishProficient Multi-Racial
Federally RequiredGraduation Rate Information
The disaggregated graduation rates ofyour district are provided forinformational purposes onlyand are not used foryour AYPdetermination.
Students withDisabilities
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Madison Local School District, Lake County
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Not Met
Met
Met
Met
Not Met
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Not M
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Not M
0% 0% >95% 81.8%
66.7% 0% 0% 88.2% 92%
8/14/2019 Madison Schools State Report Card 2009
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/madison-schools-state-report-card-2009 5/8
8/14/2019 Madison Schools State Report Card 2009
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/madison-schools-state-report-card-2009 6/8
6
Every school in SI has to create animprovement plan. If a school in SIreceives federal funds, it may have tooffer Public School Choice and/orSupplemental Educational Services.
Being in SI for three or more yearsrequires more extensive correctiveactions and, eventually, restructuring.
Generally, a school will enter SchoolImprovement (SI) after missing AYPfor two consecutive years, and it canexit SI only after meeting AYP for two
consecutive years.
Name of the School & Years in Improvement
Name of Schools Identified for Improvement and Years in Improvement Status
Schools in School Improvement
Measures of a Rigorous Curriculum for the Class of 2008
Measure 2007-08 Graduates Data Source
EMIS - EducationManagement Information Systemof the Ohio Department of Education
ACT College Entrance Exam - Nonprofit organization that administerstheACT college entrance test
College Board (SAT)- Nonprofit association that administers the SAT exam
AP - Advanced Placement, a program offering courses/exams that provide
students the opportunity to earn credit or advanced standing at colleges anduniversities
Legend
The Measures of a Rigorous Curriculum are intended toreport on the completion of a rigorous curriculum and otherindicators of studentsuccess thatensure students leaveschool with the knowledgeand skills needed to succeed in
college, careers and citizenship. These indicators pertain toschools that have any combination of grades10, 11 and 12.
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP),often referred to as “The Nation’s Report Card,” is the only nationallyrepresentative and continuingassesssubject areas. Schools and students within each stateare selected randomly to be a part of theassessment. Not all students in the state or in a particularschool take the assessment.
, and there are no individual student or even schoolsummary results. The assessments are conducted in mathematics, reading, science, writing,the arts, civics, economics, geography and U.S. history.
To view Ohio’s most recentNAEP results,
go to:
and search for key word “N AEP”
gov
91.4
Madison Local School District, Lake County
No Schools Identified for Improvement in District
1026
85
69.9
11
21.1
17.1
22
%
%
%
%
%
8/14/2019 Madison Schools State Report Card 2009
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/madison-schools-state-report-card-2009 7/8
1. If a district meets AYP in the current year, it can berated no lower than Continuous Improvement.
2. If a district does not meet AYP for three consecutive years and in the current year it does not meet AYP inmore than one student group, it can be rated no
higher than Continuous Improvement.3. In all other cases, AYP has no effect on the
preliminary designation. Thus, the preliminary designationbecomes the final designation.
Once the preliminary designation is determined, Value-Added, the fourth measure in the accountability system, is evaluated to determine the impact (if any) on the district’s finaldesignation.
1. If your district’s rating is restricted to ContinuousImprovement due to AYP, then Value-Added will have noimpact on the designation and the preliminary designationbecomes the final designation.
2. If your district experiences above expected growth for atleast two consecutive years, your district’s finaldesignation will increase by one designation.
3. If your district experiences below expected growth for atleast three consecutive years, your district’s finaldesignation will decrease by one designation.
The preliminary designation results from identifying thehigher value between the percentage of indicators met by your district and your district’s performance index. AYP then is evaluated to determine its effect on the preliminarydesignation. There are three ways in which AYP can affect the preliminary designation.
Determining Your District's Rating
Indicators Met Performance Index Score AYP Status Preliminary Designation94%-100% 100 to 120or
or
or
or
or
and
and
and
and
and
andand
Met or Not Met Excellent
75%-93.9%
0%-74.9%
50%-74.9%
31%-49.9%
0%-30.9%
90 to 99.9
80 to 89.9
0 to 89.9
70 to 79.9
0 to 69.9
Met or Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Met
Effective
Academic Watch
Academic Emergency
Continuous
Improvement
=
=
=
=
=
=
Preliminary Designation Value-Added Measure* Final Designation
Excellent
Effective
Continuous Improvement
Academic Watch
Academic Emergency
Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive yearsand
and
and
and
and
Excellent with Distinction
Effective
Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive years
Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive years
Below expected growth for at least 3 consecutive years
Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive years
Below expected growth for at least 3 consecutive years
Below expected growth for at least 3 consecutive years
Below expected growth for at least 3 consecutive years
Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive years
Below expected growth for at least 3 consecutive years
Excellent
Continuous Improvement
Academic Emergency
Academic Watch
Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement
Academic Watch
Effective
*In all other cases, including if your district’s designation has been restricted to Continuous Improvement, then Value-Added will haveno impact on the designation and the preliminary designation becomes the final designation.
or
or
or
or
or
Determiningyour district’s reportcard designationis a multi-stepprocess. Thefirst stepis to determinea preliminary designation,whichis basedon thefollowingcomponents:1)the percentageof indicators met, 2)theperformanceindex and 3)AYP determination.
Madison Local School District, Lake Coun
8/14/2019 Madison Schools State Report Card 2009
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/madison-schools-state-report-card-2009 8/8
8
Ohio Department of EducationReport Card Resources on the Web:
reportcard.ohio.govMadison Local School District, Lake County