Mac201 are you for real

31
Are you for real? The politics of reality TV and infotainment #mac201 Billy Proctor [email protected] Rob Jewitt r [email protected]. uk 1

Transcript of Mac201 are you for real

Page 1: Mac201 are you for real

1

Are you for real?The politics of reality TV and infotainment

#mac201

Billy Proctor [email protected] Rob [email protected]

Page 2: Mac201 are you for real

2

Overview

The broad claims

Reality and realism

The background

Contemporary examples

Page 3: Mac201 are you for real

3

Reality TV = Revolutionary?

‘In a mere matter of years, this newfangled genre has infiltrated virtually every corner of the television world and very quickly become a staple of every television programmer’s arsenal of program choices’ (Huff, 2006: ix).

Page 4: Mac201 are you for real

4

Page 5: Mac201 are you for real

5

Reality TV = Trash TV?

‘a development which panders to lowest common denominator tastes ... In the eyes of some, much of what has occurred in the domain of factual television is indicative of a more general cultural malaise’ (Kilborn, 2003: 1)

Page 6: Mac201 are you for real

6

Reality TV = Trash TV?

Audience research among consumers/fans of Reality TV describe it as ‘crap’, ‘an absolute load of bollocks’, and the ‘worst kind of car-crash television’ (Hill, 2008: 105-6)

Page 7: Mac201 are you for real

What is this?

Page 8: Mac201 are you for real

René Magritte The Treachery of Images

Page 9: Mac201 are you for real

9

Questioning reality

‘Television by definition is a medium that invites questions about how real its version of reality is’. (Misha Kavka in King, 2005: 93)

Realist texts ‘never give us a slice of life nor do they reflect reality’ (Morris, 2003: 4)

This is always a representation [‘re’ + ‘presentation’]. Nobody has unmediated access to reality. All reality is subjective.

Page 10: Mac201 are you for real

10

Reality and documentary

‘the term documentary is always much safer when used as an adjective rather than a noun’

‘To ask “is this a documentary project” is more useful than to ask “is this film a documentary?”’ John Corner, 2002: 258

Page 11: Mac201 are you for real

11

Access to ‘the real’?

Factual programming = serious?

A window on the world?

Educational?

Social realism: ‘record and reveal society to its members for the information and advantage of them all’ (Grierson cited in Kilborn and Izod, 1997: 46)

Page 12: Mac201 are you for real

12

Representing reality

‘Documentaries are fictions with plots, characters, situations, and events like any other. … [They] build heightened tensions and dramatically rising conflicts, and they terminate with resolution and closure. They do all of this with reference to a “reality” that is a construct, the product of signifying systems, like the documentary film itself … [This] reality, too must be scrutinized and debated as part of the domain of signification and ideology. The notion of any privileged access to a reality that exists “out there”, beyond us, is an ideological effect. The sooner we realize all this, the better’. (Nichols, 1991:107)

Page 14: Mac201 are you for real

14

The Rise of Reality TV

Page 16: Mac201 are you for real

16

The Rise of Reality TV

‘The change in factual programming over the past 15 years has been disastrous…Serious current affairs programmes have either disappeared altogether or been disastrously reduced, pushed to the margins of the schedules, or on to networks which are virtually unwatched.’ (Dunkley, 2000: 20 cited in Kilborn, 2003:

7)

Page 17: Mac201 are you for real

17

The Rise of Reality TV

‘Reality television is not the end of civilization as we know it; it is civilization as we know it. It is popular culture at its most popular, soap opera come to life’ (Greer, 2001: 1 cited in Biressi & Nunn,

2 :146).

Page 18: Mac201 are you for real

18

Background: early British examples

Crimewatch UK (BBC 1984-)

999 (BBC 1990)

Blues and Twos (ITV 1993)

Police Camera Action (ITV 1994)

Caught on Camera (ITV 1994)

Page 19: Mac201 are you for real

19

Reality TV sub-genres

Docu-soaps [Driving School; Airport; The Osbournes; Made In Chelsea]

Comedy Verité [The Office; Brass Eye]

Game Doc [Big Brother; I’m a Celebrity; X Factor]

Lifestyle [I Used to be Fat; Supersize Vs Superskinny; What not to Wear]

Page 20: Mac201 are you for real

20

Problematic umbrellas?

‘The formats usually included under this label have a quite varied relation to “the real”: some are highly narrativized and mediated, some are actually just updated game shows for whom the “reality” descriptor is more an indicator of format style than any claim to be capturing real life, and still others are essentially documentary in their format and in their ethical relation to the material they put before viewers’ (Turner, 2010: 33)

Page 21: Mac201 are you for real

21

Contemporary developments

‘ordinary people have gained unprecedented access to representation in the media. Many would argue, however, that this has not necessarily benefited those ordinary people. Indeed, as these formats developed, television producers stumbled upon a new industrial strategy for turning ordinary people into marketable celebrity-commodities’ (Turner, 2010: 33)

Page 22: Mac201 are you for real

22

Celetoids

‘Celetoids are the accessories of cultures organized around mass communications and staged authenticity. Examples include lottery winners, one-hit wonders, stalkers, whistle-blowers, sports’ arena streakers, have-a-go-heroes, mistresses of public figures and the various other social types who command media attention one day, and are forgotten the next’ (Rojek, 2001: 20-21)

Page 23: Mac201 are you for real

23

Celetoids

Page 24: Mac201 are you for real

24

Celetoids

Page 25: Mac201 are you for real

25

Ordinary people and fame

‘What is new is the discourse of self-disclosure and authenticity enabled by new television formats such as docu-soaps, reality TV and lifestyle programming that allow ordinary people a narrative of self-improvement and empowerment via personal self-disclosure and a revelation of one’s true authentic self’ (Biressi & Nunn, 2008: 138)

Page 26: Mac201 are you for real

26

Ordinary people and fame

Chantelle Houghton

Celebrity Big Brother (2006)

The only non-celebrity amongst the housemates

Chantelle: Living the Dream (2006, E4)

Chantelle’s Dream Dates (2006, E4)

Ultimate Big Brother (2010, C4)

Page 27: Mac201 are you for real

27

Simulation and performance

Big Brother

Documented housemates under duress

Moved away from social experiment to focus on performance of identities

Contestants selected on the basis of their particular personalities to create drama, conflict and entertainment.

Page 31: Mac201 are you for real

31

Some sources

Holmes, Su & Jermyn, Deborah (2008) ‘Ask the Fastidious Woman from Surbiton to Hand-wash the underpants of the Aging Oldham Skinhead...’ Why Not Wife Swap?’, in Austin, Thomas & De Jong, Wilma (eds.) Rethinking Documentary: New Perspectives, New Practices. OUP: Berkshire

Turner, Graeme (2010) Ordinary People and the Media: the Demotic Media. London: SAGE.

Kilborn, Richard (2003) Staging the Real: Factual TV Programming in the age of Big Brother. Manchester University Press: Manchester.

Huff, Richard M. (2006) Reality Television. Praeger: London

King, Geoff (2005) (ed.) The Spectacle of the Real: From Hollywood to Reality TV and Beyond. Bristol: Intellect.

Dovey, Jon (2008) ‘Simulating the Public Sphere’, in Austin, Thomas & De Jong, Wilma (eds.) Rethinking Documentary: New Perspectives, New Practices. OUP: Berkshire