M&A Case Study - Evaluation of SAIC acquisition for Ssangyong Motor
-
Upload
lehana-singh -
Category
Documents
-
view
2.597 -
download
3
description
Transcript of M&A Case Study - Evaluation of SAIC acquisition for Ssangyong Motor
SAIC Future StrategyGroup 27
Terry Weng 091152 Lehana singh 091133
Mars Ren 091119 Cindy I tang 091140 Mavis yang 091171
Lets compare both the companiesBasis of Comparison
SAIC Ssangyong Favorable / Unfavorable for acquisition
Revenues $ 15 Billion $ 3.139 Billion Favorable*
Business Model
Contract Manufacturing Independent / Self sufficient Identity
Favorable
Employees Competitive Union Controlled Unfavorable
Ownership SOE JV with Foreign companies
A large chunk owned by creditors
Favorable as creditors want to exit within 5 years
Management Competitive Heavy influence of Workers
Unfavorable
Competition in home country
Intense (only 2 players have more than 10% mkt. share)
Relatively low Unfavorable*
*Integration after acquisition, Harbir Singh, 98-33, The Wharton Financial Institution Center
How much hardware is required to meet Global Ambitions (10 scale Gap Analysis)
5 Important Factors SAIC Needs
Strong R&D Capability
Good market reach
Reputed Brand
Strong Product Portfolio
Regulatory support
Ssangyong Offer
Good background in
R&D
Reach in Korea
Well recognized in Korea
Strong Product Portfolio
Strong Korean Government
support
Fit evaluation
Good
OK
Needs facelift
Excellent
Excellent + Chinese Govt.
Support
Manf.
Portfolio
Branding
Sales
R&D
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10SAICSMCGap
What about soft issues ?
Software
Employees
Union Behavior not conducive
Unrealistic Demands
Want Board Position
Top Management Weak in front
of Union
Externally controlled past
Culture
Technical Expertise
Part of big Group
• May create Problem in future business policies• Potential conflict with SAIC Management• Some of proposed demands not viable for profitable
O/P.Union
• Potential interlinks with other companies in conglomerates (Time Bomb)
• Technical superiority culture may harm in futureCulture
Hard Factor Soft Factor
Post Acquisition Cultural Issues
Union Problems
Complementary Offer
China Korea Other
SAIC
Manf
SAIC
Brand
Rover Mktg
Rover R&D
SMC R&D
SAIC Brand
SMC R&D
SMC Brand
Rover Mktg
SMC N/W
Middle Mgmt
New Subsidary / New Name / Mgmt
D3
HR - SAIC Manf - SMC
D4
R&D - SMC
Mktg - SMC
D1 D2Top Mgmt
Selected from Union (Rotation Based)
Sales Head of
SMC Korea
SAIC Manf. Dept.
SAIC HR
Dept
Parent Company - SAIC
china Korea
Car(SMC,SAIC)
Mil. jeepCar
(SMC)SUV
Capacity Expandable Capacity Constant
ProductionChinaKorea Other
New Brand(SAIC)
SMC New Brand
SMC
LongTerm
Brand
ShortTerm
China,Korea,East
EuropeOther
Own distribution
network
Independent distributer
Sales
Philosophy Kill SMC influence
Establish New Brand
PortfolioGeo
grap
hica
l Dis
tanc
e Own Network
Independent Network
Special Agreement Scheme(New Subsidiary)
Employee conditions
Agreed+
•No new recruitment
•Performing employees promoted
•Performance System implemented strictly
•Firing for poor performers
Operations
Conditions Agreed
+
•Some models to manf. Both in China & Korea
•Investment according to Korean Market growth
Corporate conditions
Agreed +
•New name and management for company
•Board member to be appointed by SAIC ( 6 months Roatation Basis)