M17JAN14

download M17JAN14

of 2

Transcript of M17JAN14

  • 8/17/2019 M17JAN14

    1/2 

    JS Research is available on Bloomberg, Thomson Reuters, CapitalIQ and www.jsgcl.comPlease refer to the important disclaimer on the last page

      Page 1

     

      The Economic Coordination Committee (ECC) appears to have approvedthe concessionary gas pricing (US$0.7/mmbtu for 10-years) incentive fo r

    Engro’s fertilizer business, though some ambiguity on the timing and

    source of the concessionary gas flow remains.

       As per the ECC’s press release, Engro ’s concessionary gas per iod of 10years is to be extended by the number of days for wh ich SNGP could no t

    supply gas for operation of the plant.

      On a net basis, we estimate that (1) decrease in feedstock gas price forone of Engro Fertilizer’s plants to US$0.7/mmbtu coupled with (2) recent

    hike in GIDC, would increase 2014E EPS for Engro Fertilizer Ltd (EFERT)

    by 62% and for Engro Corporation L td (ENGRO) by 36%.

      In the same ECC meeting, it was decided that price differential betweenimported urea and locally produced urea should be eliminated (both to be

    priced at Rs1,786/bag). We view this positively as it (1) suggests Engro

    may not reduce urea prices further post allocation of concessionary gas

    and (2) reduces incentive for dealers to opt for cheaper impor ts.

       Ambiguity on gas source/t iming aside, the above scenar io appearshugely positive for both Engro Corporation and Engro Fertilizer. For

    other producers, the situation is less exciting where their pricing power

    has been tested with the recent decision to partly reverse urea price hike.

    Gas at concessionary rate; Engro’s time to celebrate

    The Economic Coordination Committee (ECC) appears to have approved theconcessionary gas pricing (US$0.7/mmbtu for 10-years) incentive for Engro’s

    fertilizer business. As per the ECC’s press release, Engro’s concessionary gas

    period of 10 years is to be extended by the number of days for which SNGP could

    not supply gas for operation of the plant where ENGRO has also issued a notice to

    the KSE verifying the same. That said, we flag that the ECC’s statement remains

    somewhat ambiguous on the timing and source of the concessionary gas flow and

    we await more clarity on the same before building the same into our base case for

    both Engro Corporation and Engro Fertilizer. Nevertheless, if the decision to supply

    gas to one of Engro’s plants at US$0.7/mmbtu is confirmed, we expect the same to

    deliver urea production cost savings to the tune of ~Rs250/bag for Engro Fertilizer.

     As per our calculations, incorporating the best case where the supply from Mari gasis being priced at concessionary rate of US$0.7/mmbtu the decrease in feedstock

    gas price for Engro Fertilizer, ceteris paribus, is likely to boost 2014E EPS by

    ~Rs2.4 (+62% vs. our base case) and drive up our current Target Price of Rs32 by

    45% to Rs46. Meanwhile for Engro Corporation, we flag EPS upside of ~Rs6.2

    (+36% vs. our base case) for 2014 and theoretical valuation upside of 24% to

    Rs222 (base case TP: Rs179) in case the company gets US$0.7/mmbtu gas for

    one plant.

    Pakistan Chemicals Sector

    Concessionary gas looks to be back on

    the scene for Engro

    KSE100 Index: Closing 26,730.24 (31.54)

    Market Price: Rs171.04

    Target Price: Rs179 

    KATS Code: ENGRO

    Bloomberg Code: ENGRO PA

    Reuters Code: EGCH.KA

    Market Cap: Rs87bn, US$859mn

    1-yr Avg. Daily Volume:6.2mn shares, Rs852mn, US$8.4mn

    1-yr High / Low: Rs181.38 / 83.80 

    Estimated free float: 256mn shares (50%) 

    EPS impact: Gas price for Enven

    Engro Corp Engro Fert

    Base Case (Rs320/mmbtu) 17.0 3.8

    US$0.7/mmbtu 23.2 6.2

     ∆% 36% 62%

    Source: JS Research

     

    ENGRO performance relative to KSE-100

    85%

    101%

    117%

    133%

    149%

    165%

    181%

    197%

         D    e    c

       -     1     2

         F    e     b

       -     1     3

         A    p    r   -     1     3

         J    u    n

       -     1     3

         A    u    g   -     1     3

         O    c     t   -     1     3

         D    e    c

       -     1     3

    ENGRO

    KSE-100

     Source: KSE

    MORNING BRIEFING

     

    Naveed Tehsin

    [email protected]

    + 9221 111-574-111

    Ext: 3100

    J a n u a r y 1 7 , 2 0 1 4  

  • 8/17/2019 M17JAN14

    2/2

     

    J a n u a r y 1 7 , 2 0 1 4  

    MORNING BRIEFING

    Page 2

     

    Pakistan market statisti cs (Jan 16, 14)

    KSE-100 Index

    Previous KSE-100 Index

    Change from last closing

    Change from last closing (%)

    KSE Market Cap. (Rs. bn)

    KSE Market Cap. (US$ bn)

    Total Volume (Shares mn)

    Traded Value (Rs. bn)

    Traded Value (US$ mn)

    KSE-30 Index

    Change from last closing

    Change from last closing (%) -0.17%

    KSE Futures Volume (Shares mn) 16.80

    KSE Futures Value (Rs. mn)KSE Futures Spread

    Source: KSE

    26,730.24

    26,761.78-31.54

    -0.12%

    3.51%

    88.04

    19,578.46

    -33.26

    1,676.15

    6,471.08

    61.33

    348.06

    9.29

     

    KSE valuations

    2013A/E 2014E 2015F

     P/E (x) 10.0  8.8  8.2 

    P/BV (x) 2.1  1.9  1.8 

    Div. Yield (%) 5% 5% 6%

     Earnings growth 9% 15% 6%

    Source: JS Research

     

    JS Global Capital Limited

    6thFloor,FaysalHouse,Shahrah-e-Faisal,Karachi 

    Research Equity Sales

    Tel:+92(21)32799005Tel:+92(21)32799513

    Fax:+92(21)32800163Fax:+92(21)32800166

    [email protected] [email protected]

    Urea price differential matched

    In the same ECC meeting, it has been decided that the price of imported urea be

    raised to the level of locally produced urea, i.e. Rs1,786/bag from Rs1,600/bag

    previously so as to curb corruption due to differential in prices. We view this news

    positively for the industry as it (1) suggests Engro may not reduce urea prices

    further post allocation of concessionary gas and (2) reduces incentive for dealers to

    opt for cheaper imports. However, we flag that for peers, the risk of further hike in

    gas prices and the fertilizer sector’s resultant inability to pass on the incremental

    gas cost remains. To recall, last week government and urea producers reached an

    agreement to bring down urea price by Rs114/bag to Rs1,786/bag from

    Rs1,900/bag, prior to which urea producers had raised prices by Rs178/bag to

    offset the incremental impact of hike in Gas Infrastructure Development Cess

    (GIDC). Net allowable increase in urea prices stands at Rs64/bag.

    Low pricing power despite ~Rs800/bag price differential

    While both Engro Corp and Engro Fertilizer should emerge as winners in the above

    scenario, for other producers the situation is less exciting where their pricing power

    has been tested with the recent decision to partly reverse urea price hike. This is

    despite the fact that the price differential between imported and domestically

    produced urea has expanded to ~Rs800/bag at current international urea price of

    ~US$370/ton (FOB).

    Forex reserves up by US 267mn

    The country's liquid forex reserves registered an increase of US$267mn during last

    week. As per the data, country's total forex reserves surged to $8.32bn as on

    January 10, 2014 compared to $8.05bn a week earlier. Reserves held by the SBP

    increased by US$222mn to US$3.47bn while those held by commercial banks

    witnessed an increase of US$45.4mn to US4.85bn.

    Also in Focus

    This report has been prepared for information purposes by the Research Department of JS Global Capital Ltd. The information and data on which this report is based are obtained from sources whichwe believe to be reliable but we do not guarantee that it is accurate or complete. In particular, the report takes no account of the investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs ofinvestors who should seek further professional advice or rely upon their own judgment and acumen before making any investment. This report should also not be considered as a reflection on theconcerned company’s management and its performances or ability, or appreciation or criticism, as to the affairs or operations of such company or institution. Warning: This report may not bereproduced, distributed or published by any person for any purpose whatsoever. Action will be taken for unauthorized reproduction, distribution or publication.