[M] Calculating the Gutenberg-Richter b Value - Felzer
-
Upload
ekrar-winata -
Category
Documents
-
view
240 -
download
0
description
Transcript of [M] Calculating the Gutenberg-Richter b Value - Felzer
![Page 1: [M] Calculating the Gutenberg-Richter b Value - Felzer](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042516/55cf8fb9550346703b9f324e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Calculating the Gutenberg-Richter b value
Karen FelzerUSGS
![Page 2: [M] Calculating the Gutenberg-Richter b Value - Felzer](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042516/55cf8fb9550346703b9f324e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The Gutenberg-Richter magnitudefrequency relationship
1976-2005 Global CMT catalog
log(N) = a - bM
Slope = b =1.0
![Page 3: [M] Calculating the Gutenberg-Richter b Value - Felzer](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042516/55cf8fb9550346703b9f324e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Common Errors in b value Calculation
1. Fitting data with linear least squares(LSQ) rather than the simple maximumlikelihood (MLE) method (read Aki(1965))
2. Data set is too small3. Using earthquakes smaller than the
catalog completeness threshold4. Using data with magnitude errors
![Page 4: [M] Calculating the Gutenberg-Richter b Value - Felzer](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042516/55cf8fb9550346703b9f324e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Error: Data set too small
>2000 good quality earthquakes are required for 98%confidence errors < 0.05
0.91 - 1.12500
0.86 - 1.20100
0.5 - 1.4950
0.7 - 1.7430
n b range
![Page 5: [M] Calculating the Gutenberg-Richter b Value - Felzer](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042516/55cf8fb9550346703b9f324e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Error: Using earthquakes smaller than thecatalog completeness threshold
Probability ofearthquake detection
= 1 - C10-M
Setting the catalog completeness threshold by eye can lead tob value underestimation by 0.1 to 0.2.
![Page 6: [M] Calculating the Gutenberg-Richter b Value - Felzer](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042516/55cf8fb9550346703b9f324e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Error: Using data with magnitude errors
1984-1999 Southern California Catalog
• Larger magnitude errors for smaller earthquakes inflate b• b is best fit at the largest reasonable minimum magnitude
b value inflated bymagnitude error
![Page 7: [M] Calculating the Gutenberg-Richter b Value - Felzer](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042516/55cf8fb9550346703b9f324e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Two Important Questions
• Does b value vary with location? (Wiemerand Wyss, 1997; Schorlemmer and Wiemer,2004…)
• Does the magnitude-frequencydistribution vary on and off of majorfaults? (Wesnousky et al. 1983; Schwartz andCoppersmith, 1984…)
![Page 8: [M] Calculating the Gutenberg-Richter b Value - Felzer](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042516/55cf8fb9550346703b9f324e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Location: We calculate b values in 1° x 1°bins throughout California
Assuming no magnitude error and uniform catalogcompleteness to M 2.6, all values are 0.9 ≤ b ≤1.1.
Same for 0.5 °x 0.5 °, 0.25 °x 0.25 °, 0.1° x 0.1 ° bins
Minimum of 30earthquakes/calculation
1984 - 2004
![Page 9: [M] Calculating the Gutenberg-Richter b Value - Felzer](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042516/55cf8fb9550346703b9f324e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Is the magnitude-frequency distributiondifferent on and off of major faults?
?
![Page 10: [M] Calculating the Gutenberg-Richter b Value - Felzer](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042516/55cf8fb9550346703b9f324e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Quiz!
![Page 11: [M] Calculating the Gutenberg-Richter b Value - Felzer](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042516/55cf8fb9550346703b9f324e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Identify the distributions taken frommajor fault zones*
*Fault zone: +-2 km from entire surface trace of mapped fault.All data from California, 1984-2004
(A) (B) (C)
(D) (E) (F)
![Page 12: [M] Calculating the Gutenberg-Richter b Value - Felzer](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042516/55cf8fb9550346703b9f324e/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Hayward
Identify the distributions taken frommajor fault zones*
*Fault zone: +-2 km from entire surface trace of mapped faultAll data from California, 1984-2004
(A) (B) (C)
(D) (E) (F)
SAF
SAJ Random Random
Random
![Page 13: [M] Calculating the Gutenberg-Richter b Value - Felzer](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042516/55cf8fb9550346703b9f324e/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Quiz #2!
![Page 14: [M] Calculating the Gutenberg-Richter b Value - Felzer](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042516/55cf8fb9550346703b9f324e/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Identify the distributions taken frommajor fault zones
All distributions are purposely chosen around a largeearthquake. All data from California, 1984-2004
(A) (B)
(C) (D)
![Page 15: [M] Calculating the Gutenberg-Richter b Value - Felzer](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042516/55cf8fb9550346703b9f324e/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Identify the distributions taken frommajor fault zones
All of these earthquake distributions are purposelycentered around a large earthquake in the catalog
(A) (B)
(C) (D)
Calaveras Random
Random Garlock
![Page 16: [M] Calculating the Gutenberg-Richter b Value - Felzer](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042516/55cf8fb9550346703b9f324e/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
But isn’t the San Andreas clearlycharacteristic?
M 6 Parkfield earthquakes are simply an expected partof the G-R distribution (Jackson and Kagan, 2006)
Not at Parkfield!
![Page 17: [M] Calculating the Gutenberg-Richter b Value - Felzer](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042516/55cf8fb9550346703b9f324e/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
The historic record along the full SAF1812-2006 eqs, ± 10 km from SAF
Incomplete
Complete?
Catalog is too incomplete, short, and error-prone, butGutenberg-Richter is suggested
![Page 18: [M] Calculating the Gutenberg-Richter b Value - Felzer](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042516/55cf8fb9550346703b9f324e/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Conclusions
• Calculating an accurate b value is critical forhazard analysis, physical understanding.
• b value should be solved for with MLE and>2000 quality earthquakes above the catalogcompleteness threshold.
• There is no evidence for significant b valuevariation with location or on/off of major faultsin California.
![Page 19: [M] Calculating the Gutenberg-Richter b Value - Felzer](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042516/55cf8fb9550346703b9f324e/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Error #1: Fitting with least squaresrather than MLE
b value solved from 100 trials with 500 simulatedearthquakes each; true b=1.0.
LSQsolutions
MLEsolutions
• MLE solutions are closer to the true value of b
![Page 20: [M] Calculating the Gutenberg-Richter b Value - Felzer](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042516/55cf8fb9550346703b9f324e/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Why the value of b is important
Hazard Analysis: Small changes in b => largechanges in projected numbers of major earthquakes
10,000 M ≥ 4 earthquakes10 M ≥ 7 eqs
20 M ≥ 7 eqs
b = 1.0
b = 0.9
Earthquake Physics: The magnitude distributionreflects fundamental properties of how earthquakesgrow and stop.
Example
![Page 21: [M] Calculating the Gutenberg-Richter b Value - Felzer](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042516/55cf8fb9550346703b9f324e/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Error #1: Fitting with linear least squares(LSQ) rather than MLE
LSQ assumes the error at each pointis Gaussian rather than Poissonian
LSQ assumes the erroron each point is equal
• LSQ is disproportionately influenced by the largestearthquakes
• MLE weighs each earthquake equally