m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

download m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

of 67

Transcript of m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    1/67

    KIGALI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

    INSTITUT DES SCIENCES ET DE TECHNOLOGIE DE KIGALIAvenue de l'Arme, B.P. 3900 Kigali, Rwanda

    FACULTY OF ENGINEERING

    DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY

    A PROJECT REPORT

    ON

    DESIGN OF FLYOVER SUSPENDED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE IN KIGALI

    CITY

    Submitted by

    RYOBA VUZIMPUNDU Eugne(REG.NO: GS20031702)Under the Guidance of

    Mr. NGARAMBE Andr

    Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of

    BACHELOR OF SCIENCE DEGREE IN

    CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY

    FEBRUARY 2008

    PROJECTID:CEET/07/3

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    2/67

    Final year project

    i

    DECLARATION

    I, RYOBA VUZIMPUNDU EUGENE declare that this project work is my own work

    and has not been represented any were else, either Universities or any other Institutions

    of high learning, for academic or any other purposes.

    Signature ..

    RYOBA Vuzimpundu Eugne

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    3/67

    Final year project

    ii

    DEDICATION

    To my GOD, my family; my beloved parents, brothers and sisters, I dedicate this book;it is the fruit of your love and encouragement. I dedicate also this book to all survivors

    of genocide of 1994 and NDAHAYO JULES who passed away in last year; we always

    remember you.

    You all, I love you.

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    4/67

    Final year project

    iii

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    It was a deep sense of gratitude that I address my acknowledgements to my parent,

    brother and sisters I am grateful to them, for having continuously supported me during

    my studies till at present and tough me the value of life.

    I am wholeheartedly indebted to my classmates, my friends, whose love, advices,

    motivation and encouragement made me who I am now, and without whom this project

    would ever have seen light of the day, this is the impatiently awaited fruit of their

    endeavors.

    I would like to express my heat-felt gratitude to KIST authorities, whose financial

    supports and extraordinary effort made this project possible.

    I thank my project guidance, Mr. Andre NGARAMBE, whose inspiring guidance and

    innovative question have made this project a pleasurable learning and working

    experience.

    Many thanks whomever his assistance and advice, helped me to successfully complete

    my project.

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    5/67

    Final year project

    iv

    ABSTRACT

    The purpose of this bridge was to make the conception, the analysis and design of

    flyover suspended pedestrian bridge in Kigali City. The following study was

    completed with three phases. The first phase involved a deep investigation for the

    bridge in which enough and relevant information were gathered from different area in

    Kigali City.

    Investigation did not only cover the site conditions, but also the availability of the local

    materials as well as produced by the industries of our country of was used in second

    phase of the project; this phase involved mainly the conception or the architectural

    design of the bridge. At the end of the second phase, a steel structure was generated and

    then in the last phase, subjected to the detailed structural analysis so as to obtain the

    forces within the different component of the bridge. These former were used, in turn to

    design the different component of the structure. In design, most of standards

    specification and practice codes used were prepared.

    Finally, detailed plans and drawing were prepared. The achievements of this study

    reveal the possibility of improving condition of the mixed traffic by separating

    pedestrians and vehicles.

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    6/67

    Final year project

    v

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    DECLARATION ............................................................................................................... i

    DEDICATION ................................................................................................................. ii

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................ iiiABSTRACT .................................................................................................................... iv

    TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................. v

    LIST OF FIGURES AND PHOTOS .............................................................................. vii1. FIGURES ............................................................................................................... vii

    2. PHOTOS ................................................................................................................ viiiLIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................... ix

    LIST OF SYMBOLS, ABBREVIATIONS AND NOMENCLATURE .......................... x

    CHAPTER 0.INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 10.1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION .............................................................................. 1

    0.2 JUSTIFICATION OF THE PROJECT .................................................................. 2

    0.3 GENERAL OBJECTIVES AND AIMS OF THE PROJECT ............................... 30.3.1 GENERAL OBJECTIVES .............................................................................. 30.3.2 AIM OF THE PROJECT ................................................................................. 4

    0.4 SCOPE OF THE STUDY ...................................................................................... 4

    0.5 SITE INVESTIGATION ........................................................................................ 60.6 PROBLEM FACED ............................................................................................... 6

    0.7 TRAFFIC VOLUME STUDY ............................................................................... 8

    0.8 DATA COLLECTION FROM TRAFFIC POLICE .............................................. 90.8.1 CAUSE OF ACCIDENTS INYEAR 2005-2006 .......................................... 10

    0.8.2 HOUR ACCIDENT SURVEY IN YEAR 2005 AND 2006 ......................... 11

    CHAP I. LITERATURE REVIEW .............................................................................. 12

    1.1 INTRODUCTION TO SUSPENSION BRIDGES .............................................. 121.2 DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................... 12

    1.3 THEORY ON SUSPENSION BRIDGE .............................................................. 14

    1.4 TYPES OF SUSPENSION BRIDGES ................................................................ 15CHAP II. MATERIALS FOR CONSTRUCTING OF THE ......................................... 16

    PROPOSED PROJECT .................................................................................................. 16

    2.1 INTRODUCTION ON COMMONLY USED MATERIALS ............................. 162.2 TYPES OF SUSPENSION BRIDGE CABLES .................................................. 17

    2.2.1 CABLE STRUCTURES ............................................................................... 17

    2.2.2 TYPES OF WIRE CABLES ......................................................................... 182.3 REINFORCED CONCRETE MATERIAL ......................................................... 20

    2.3.1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION ..................................................................... 202.3.2 CEMENT ....................................................................................................... 20

    2.3.3 AGGREGATE ............................................................................................... 222.4 STRUCTURE OF WOOD ................................................................................... 23

    2.4.1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION ..................................................................... 23

    2.4.2 CLASSIFICATION OF TREES ................................................................... 232.5 COLUMNS ........................................................................................................... 23

    2.5.1 INTRODUCTION ON COLUMNS .............................................................. 23

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    7/67

    Final year project

    vi

    2.4.2 CLASSIFICATION OF COLUMNS ............................................................ 24

    2.6 FOUNDATION .................................................................................................... 242.6.1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION ...................................................................... 24

    2.6.2 FOUNDATIONS AND THE EARTH .......................................................... 25

    2.6.3 TYPES OF FOUNDATION .......................................................................... 25

    2.7 BEARING CAPACITY OF SOIL ........................................................................ 262.8 LOADING ............................................................................................................ 26

    2.8.1 DEAD LOADS .............................................................................................. 27

    2.8.2 IMPOSED LOADS ........................................................................................ 272.8.3 DESIGN STRESS .......................................................................................... 27

    CHAP III METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................... 28

    CHAP IV DESIGN OF FLYOVER SUSPENDED PEDESTRIAN BRDGE ............... 294.1 DESIGN INFORMATION ................................................................................... 30

    4.2 DESIGN THEORY ............................................................................................... 30

    4.3 DESIGN OF MAIN CABLE DIAMETER .......................................................... 324.4 DESIGN OF TRUE LENGTH OF MAIN CABLES ........................................... 34

    4.5 DESIGN OF TRANSVERSAL AND LONGITUDINAL BEAMS .................... 354.5.1 DESIGN OF TRANSVERSAL ..................................................................... 35

    4.5.2 DESIGN LONGITUDINAL BEAMS ........................................................... 374.6 DESIGN OF SUSPENDERS CABLE DIAMETER ............................................ 39

    4.7 DESIGN OF TOWERS ........................................................................................ 40

    4.8 DESIGN OF FOUNDATION............................................................................... 414.9 DESIGN OF COLUMN BASE ............................................................................ 43

    4.10 DESIGN OF STAIRS LONGITIDUNALY BEAMS ........................................ 45

    4.11 DESIGN OF LATERAL BEAMS OF STAIRS ................................................. 474.12 DESIGN OF SUPPORT COLUMN OF STAIRS .............................................. 48

    4.13 DESIGN OF FOUNDATION FOR COLUMNS OF STAIRS .......................... 494.14 DESIGN OF ANCHORAGE BLOCKS ............................................................. 50

    4.15 DESIGN CONNECTIONS WITH BOLTS........................................................ 51

    V. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION ......................................................... 525.1 CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................... 52

    5.2 RECOMMENDATION ........................................................................................ 52

    REFERENCES ............................................................................................................... 53

    APPENDICES ................................................................................................................ 54

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    8/67

    Final year project

    vii

    LIST OF FIGURES AND PHOTOS

    1. FIGURES

    Figure 1: Parts of suspended bridgep13

    Figure2: 1. Galvanized Bridge Wire...p17

    Figure3: Parallel Wire Cable...p18

    Figure 4: Detail of Main Cable and Cable Band.p18

    Figure 5: Close-up view of Main Cable..p19

    Figure 6: Cable with Clipp19

    Figure 7: bridge span, loading and flesh.p31

    Figure 8.1: load diagram.p33

    Figure 8.2: loading diagram in lateral direction.p33

    Figure 8.3: result of diagram cable.p35

    Figure 9: transversal beam..p35

    Figure 10: load, shear, moment...p36

    Figure 11: load, shear and moment.....p38

    Figure 12: suspender cable diameter...p39

    Figure 13: load column....p40

    Figure 14: column and beam dimension.p41

    Figure 15: foundation..p42

    Figure 16: Reinforcement in foundation.p43

    Figure 17: bars in foundation..p43

    Figure 18: base column ..p44

    Figure 19: fixation and connection of base column.....p45

    Figure 20: stair span.............................................................................p46

    Figure 21: load, shear and moment..p48Figure 22: columnp49

    Figure 23: anchor and fixation of cable...p50

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    9/67

    Final year project

    viii

    2. PHOTOS

    Photo1: Mixture crossing of road of pedestrians and vehiclesp 11

    Photo 2: big number of pedestriansp11

    Photo 3: scope of the study..p14

    Photo 4: big number of vehicles at the site of the study..p14

    Photo 5: inattention of policemen, pedestrians, and driversp16

    Photo 6: time west for crossing loadp16

    Photo 7: Big volume of pedestrians crossing the Round about...p18

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    10/67

    Final year project

    ix

    LIST OF TABLES

    Table 1: traffic volume survey; Round about Kigali city, Nyarugengep17

    Table 2: percentage of death, injured and accident in Kigali city...p18

    Table 3: causes of accidents in Kigali city..p 19

    Table 4: Daily hour accidentp19

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    11/67

    Final year project

    x

    LIST OF SYMBOLS, ABBREVIATIONS AND NOMENCLATURE

    A cross sectional area

    B beam width, foundation base

    bf width of pad of foundation

    cm centimeter

    C span, width

    FCV vertical component of force

    FCH horizontal component of force

    D diameter, depth

    DW horizontal distance

    DT vertical inclined distance

    d effective depth

    F axial Force

    E modulus of elasticity

    y deflection

    fk characteristic of compressive strength of masonry

    fck concrete characteristic strength

    fyk reinforcement characteristic strength

    g gram

    I moment of inertia of area

    k kilo

    L length, length of span

    l true length

    LE effective length

    M bending moment

    Max maximum

    Min minimum

    m2 meter square

    mm2

    millimeter square

    N Newton

    Pc compressive strength of beam

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    12/67

    Final year project

    xi

    q Ground pressure under foundation

    R reaction at the end

    r radius of gyration

    S plastic modulus

    t beam web thickness

    T tension

    UDL uniformly distributed load

    V shear force

    v design shear stress

    W magnitude of uniformly distributed load

    w uniformly distributed load

    WA weight of anchor block

    angle

    Stress

    y yield stress

    pi

    Elongation

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    13/67

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    14/67

    Final year project

    1

    CHAPTER 0.INTRODUCTION

    DESIGN OF ECONOMIC FLYOVER SUSPENDED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE

    IN KIGALI CITY

    0.1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION

    The Kigali City, the now days facing traffic problems mainly due to the increase in the

    number of vehicles, The increase is directly related to the parallel increase in population

    number and based also on the vision plan of the Kigali City.

    The traffic problems include traffic jams, which normally result in delays and

    increase in load cost, accident which result in damage to vehicles as well as loss of

    human lives.

    It may be observed that most of accidents involving pedestrians occurs while

    they crossing road of heavy vehicles, inattention or/and high speed traffic. Mean while,

    quite number of solution has been worked out and implemented at different location of

    interest within the City of Kigali; among this we can mention here, the use of traffic

    policemen, traffic lights, speed ramps, zebra crossing and road signs. Some of these,

    such as traffic lights (signals) and policemen or manual control and other measures

    control and other previous performed ineffectively if not failed.

    Therefore, based on the previous stated solution, my challenge in the prevent

    project was to find out a new and better solution why not be best, using the modern

    trend and technologies. The solution would be the permitting the smooth, safe, secure,

    and smart passage of vehicles and pedestrians. While studying this problem of crossing

    the roads, I thought the possible and effective solution would aim at separating the two

    traffic component mean pedestrians and vehicles.

    This implies directly prevision for a pedestrian path under above the road way.

    However, further observation of how roads are constructed in Kigali City dictate thesolution of an economic flyover pedestrian bridge as the adequate solution.

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    15/67

    Final year project

    2

    Photo1: Mixture crossing of road of pedestrians and vehicles in Kigali road.

    0.2 JUSTIFICATION OF THE PROJECT

    As here above mentioned, there is a problem of crossing roads certain particular places

    in KIGALI CITY, where the traffic is heavy. There is proved or supported by findings

    from accidents study made by traffic police office. The survey conducted by this office

    shows the increase of big number of accident along with an increase in number of

    vehicles. The cause of different accidents varies from an accident to another. Some are

    due to the high speed of vehicles, bad driving, other to the violation of road codes,

    either intentionally or not, on other hand, some of road users such as children, present

    difficulties in crossing roads of heavy traffic.

    However, the services in change took measures so in order to overcome this

    problem. Different methods as mentioned in the introduction of this project are now

    used but they are suffering from certain handicap, and sometimes create auxiliary

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    16/67

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    17/67

    Final year project

    4

    0.3.2 AIM OF THE PROJECT

    The main aim of the project can be follows:

    Making conception, analysis, as well as design of an economic flyoversuspended pedestrian bridge in KIGALI CITY constructed by local materialsuch as metallic profiles, steel and wood etc.

    0.4 SCOPE OF THE STUDY

    The suitable site was selected based on the traffic volume mean for pedestrian and

    vehicles where there is a big number of pedestrians crossing the roads, also the second

    criteria was to find out the most difficult place to within Kigalis districts as well as

    Nyarugenge, Kicuciro and Gasabo district.

    Gitega (EPA)

    Kanogo at TOTAL (ex-SOPETRAD) Payage (on boulevard de lOUA Kiyovu) Kimihurura (primarly school) Sainte famille church (round about) Round about (town center RUBANGURA) Remera Giporoso

    The third criteria concerned the category of pedestrians facing problem such as children

    going and coming from school, adult people going or coming from church and also

    based on the accidents records from the traffic police office.

    Gitega (EPA) Sainte famille (near round about town center) Kimihurura (primarily school) Round about (town center RUBANGURA in front of Ex-Nyira-Rock )

    Finely, ROUND ABOUT town center (RUBANGURA) in front of near Nyira-Rock

    was selected as the site thats the characteristics mentioned above.

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    18/67

    Final year project

    5

    Photo 3: scope of the

    study

    Photo 4: big number of vehicles at the site of the study

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    19/67

    Final year project

    6

    0.5 SITE INVESTIGATION

    Before a pedestrian bridge can be built at a particular site, it is essential to consider

    many factors, such as the need for a pedestrian bridge, the present and future traffic,stream characteristics, subsoil condition, aesthetics and cost. For the design of this

    pedestrian bridge, the highest vehicles are considered so the height of 3.5m of the

    pedestrian bridge has been chosen.

    0.6 PROBLEM FACED

    The big number of pedestrians crossing Kigali roads where zebra crossings arenot efficient enough to guarantee security of pedestrians.

    The time people use waiting for priority to cross roads. The time drivers use waiting for priority to go. Tasks for pedestrians and for drivers in the roads during the crossing roads of

    pedestrians.

    Traffic jams in Kigali roads Inefficiency of the zebra crossing while peak period. Inattentions of pedestrians and drivers.

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    20/67

    Final year project

    7

    Photo 5: inattention of policemen, pedestrians, and drivers

    Photo 6: time west for crossing road

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    21/67

    Final year project

    8

    0.7 TRAFFIC VOLUME STUDY

    The traffic volume study was conducted with the aim of determining the number of

    vehicles as well as pedestrians crossing the section of the road where the bridge is

    proposed to be built, per unit time within peak traffic periods

    The traffic volume counts were done manually and here below are tabulated result.

    All bellow survey are counted in the period of 3 days of week mean that a number is a

    mean value of 3 days of week, Monday, Wednesday, and Friday.

    Table 1: traffic volume survey; Round about Kigali city, Nyarugene

    Peak

    period

    Peak

    hour

    Number of

    pedestrians/minute

    Number of

    vehicles/minute

    Total number

    of

    pedest./hour

    Total number

    of vehic/hour

    Morning 7h00-

    8h00

    59 36 3540 2160

    Noon 12h30-

    13h30

    48 23 2880 1380

    Evening 16h30-

    17h30

    63 42 3780 2520

    MEAN TOTAL

    VALUE

    57 34 3400 2020

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    22/67

    Final year project

    9

    Photo 7: Big volume of pedestrians crossing the Round about Kigali city

    0.8 DATA COLLECTION FROM TRAFFIC POLICE

    This is the percentage of death, injured, and accidents in the period of 2 years.

    Table 2: percentage of death, injured and accident in Kigali city

    Death Injured AccidentYear 2005, Jan-Dec 33,2% 66,7% 70,1%

    Year 2006, Jan-Dec 27,5% 57,1% 67,1%

    Source: Traffic police

    Those are the accident happened in KIGALI CITY.

    Year 2005: From the total number of accident which was happen in all country the

    70, 1%; 33% dead; and 66, 7% injured in Kigali City only.

    Year 2007: the total number of accident is 67, 1%; 27, 5% death, and 57, 1 injured.

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    23/67

    Final year project

    10

    0.8.1 CAUSE OF ACCIDENTS INYEAR 2005-2006

    Table 3: causes of accidents in Kigali city

    Causes 2005 2006 %of 2006 % of 2005

    Signalisation

    03 08 0,23 0,065

    Other 205 1373,89

    4,5

    High speed 573 40711,6

    12,58

    Inattention 2552 186452,9

    56,01

    State of road 43 501,42

    0,94

    Bad driving 871 74721,2

    19,12

    Alcholism 110 1243,52

    2,41

    Rain 11 120,34

    0,24

    Mecanical errors 187 1744,94

    4,1

    Total 4556 3523

    Source: Traffic police

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    24/67

    Final year project

    11

    0.8.2 HOUR ACCIDENT SURVEY IN YEAR 2005 AND 2006

    Table 4: Daily hour accident

    Hourly Year 2005 % Year 2006 %

    06h00-08h00 -

    08h00-09h00 230 6,5% 230 6,5%

    09h00-10h00 - - 230 6,5%

    10h00-11h00 - - 226 6,4%

    14h00-15h00 319 7% - -

    15h00-16h00 331 7,2% - -

    16h00-17h00 331 7,2% - -17h00-18h00 370 8,1% 244 6,9%

    18h00-19h00 338 7,4% 243 6,9%

    19h00-20h00 230 6,5%

    Source: National

    police

    As it seems from table the percentage of accident in one hour is the counted

    from the total number of accident happened in one day in hourly

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    25/67

    Final year project

    12

    CHAP I. LITERATURE REVIEW

    1.1 INTRODUCTION TO SUSPENSION BRIDGES

    This booklet was put together to familiarize the general reader with the terminology of

    suspension bridge components and to help the designer, builder or user of a small

    suspension bridge. Its use should enable him to make up preliminary calculations for

    determining the cable size as well as the various quantities of material required. Then, a

    comparative estimate can be made between the suspension bridge and any other type

    that may also be under consideration for a particular location.

    It is rather interesting to note that, in spite of the relative simplicity of design and

    erection of a suspension bridge, there are a number of cases where other types have

    been used, even though the suspension type might have been more economical. We

    think that this is because many engineers have been of the opinion that the cable

    analysis might be difficult and complicated as to its solution. However, the simple

    formulae used in the catalog should dispel this thought.

    True to their name, suspension bridges suspend the roadway from huge main cables,

    which extend from one end of the bridge to the other. These cables rest on top of high

    towers and are secured at each end by anchorages. The towers enable the main cables to

    be draped over long distances.

    1.2 DESCRIPTION

    Suspension bridges have two basic systems-main cables supported by towers at each

    end over the obstacle and a roadway suspended from the main cables. Suspender cables

    support the floor beams, which support the stringers that support the roadway.

    Stiffening trusses further spread the live load to the suspenders. Suspension-bridge

    design requires analysis of the following items:

    Load to be carried. Panel length. Floor beams and stringers.

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    26/67

    Final year project

    13

    Stiffening trusses. Dead load. Suspenders. Main cables or suspension cables. Towers. Tower bracing and backstays. Anchorages or deadman.

    Figure 1: Parts of suspended bridge

    Source: hp: // www.google.com

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    27/67

    Final year project

    14

    1.3 THEORY ON SUSPENSION BRIDGE

    A suspension bridge is composed of a deck that is attached to or suspended from cables.

    Just like the name states, the suspended bridge literally suspends the roadbed from huge

    cables, which extend form one end of the bridge to the other. The cables are attached totwo tall towers and are secured at each end by anchorages. The tower allows the cables

    to be draped over very long distances. The cable carries the weight on a suspended

    bridge to the anchorages that are imbedded in solid rock or massive concrete blocks.

    The cables are spread over a large area in order to evenly distribute the load inside the

    anchorages to prevent the cables from breaking free.

    In the suspension bridge each cable supporting a segment of the roadbed is vertically

    suspended from the primary draped cable spanning between main pylon towers. The

    forces from permanent and moving loads push down onto the roadbed placing it in

    compression. The cables through tension then transfer the forces to the towers, which

    carries the forces, through compression, directly into the earth where they are firmly

    imbedded. The tension cables running between the two anchorages support the forces.

    The cables stretch from the weight of the bridge and the traffic that travels from anchor

    to anchor. In addition to the cables, the anchorages are also under the forces of tension.

    Because they are firmly imbedded into the earth like the towers, the amount of tensionexerted on them is resisted by the counter forces of the dead load. Most suspension

    bridges also have a supporting truss system underneath the bridge deck to help stiffen

    the roadbed and to provide a lateral stabilization of the roadbed. This extra support

    system resists wind and lateral forces and reduces the tendency of the roadbed to ripple

    and sway.

    Suspension bridges come in two different types of designs; the elongated "M" shape and

    the "A" shaped design called a cable-stayed bridge. The two designs support the load of

    the roadbed in very different ways. The differences lie in the way the cables are

    connected to the towers. The cable-stayed bridge attaches all cables that support the

    roadbed to the tower and they alone carry the weight of the roadbed and the traffic. The

    series of cables are attached to the roadbed in two basic ways, using a running parallel

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    28/67

    Final year project

    15

    pattern or a radial pattern. In the parallel pattern, the cables are parallel to one another

    and attached at different heights along the tower. Each cable carries a segment of the

    roadbed. In the radial pattern, each cable carries its section of the roadbed and they are

    attached to the tower at a single point. In the cable stay bridge, all segments of the

    roadbed must carry a horizontal compressive force to counter balance the equal force

    from the other side.

    1.4 TYPES OF SUSPENSION BRIDGES

    Unstiffened bridges

    Unstiffened bridges consist of floors, without stiffening trusses or girders, suspended

    from cables. These bridges are suitable only where live load or wind load can never

    cause serious deformation of the cable. An example of this type of bridge would be a

    footbridge, where the live load is very light. Other examples are structures with a large

    dead load but insignificant live load.

    Stiffened bridges

    Stiffened bridges have flexible cables that are stiffened by suspended girders or trusses.

    These bridges minimize local changes in roadway slope due to live loads. They are

    constructed by framing the floor beams of the floor system into stiffening trusses and

    supporting these trusses with hangers running to the cables.

    Self-anchored bridges

    Self-anchored bridges are supported on vertical foundations, and no anchor cable is

    required. The horizontal force on the main cable is exerted by endwise thrusts in the

    stiffening girder.

    Multiple-span bridges

    Multiple-span bridges are a combination of two or more adjoining suspension bridges

    sharing a common anchorage. The towers of these bridges are connected by a tie cable

    to restrain movement of the tower tops from unbalanced live loads.

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    29/67

    Final year project

    16

    CHAP II. MATERIALS FOR CONSTRUCTING OF THE

    PROPOSED PROJECT

    2.1 INTRODUCTION ON COMMONLY USED MATERIALS

    Steel, Concrete, Aluminum alloy, Timber, Masonry and Fiber composite Materials fall

    in three categories:

    - Natural material such as stone and timber have been used for centuries asbuilding material, and their properties are well understood by craftsmen for use

    in small-scale building. However, because they are natural materials, they are of

    variable quality and often contain significant defects. This means that, for use in

    large scale engineered structures, they need to be carefully selected andsubjected to large material safety factors to ensure safety.

    - Manufactured materials such us steel and aluminum alloy are produced undercarefully controlled factory conditions, with frequent testing and monitoring

    throughout the manufacturing process. This obliviously produces a more

    predictable and consistent material which is reflected in lower material safety

    factors being required. Concrete lies somewhere between these two being

    manufactured from naturals with little intermediate processing.

    - New materials such as fiber reinforced composites. They are highlymanufactured materials, but unlike steel, have not been in existence long enough

    to be fully understood.

    Factors affecting the selection of structural materialsThis chapter briefly describes the commonly used material. We then go on to examine

    the various factors that must be considered when selecting a material for the building of

    safe and durable structures. Those factors are: strength and stiffness, durability, fatigue,

    brittle fracture, creep, fire resistance, weight, economics environmental factors. This is

    firstly done by considering the properties of steel, which is one of the most commonly,

    used materials.

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    30/67

    Final year project

    17

    2.2 TYPES OF SUSPENSION BRIDGE CABLES

    2.2.1 CABLE STRUCTURES

    Cable structures can be exciting, lightweight and highly efficient. It is usual to use

    cables made from a very high grade steel. This produces large concentrations of

    load, and hence particular care must be taken with the design and manufacture of

    end connections if catastrophic failure is to be avoided. A key feature of all design

    involving cables is that they are assumed to support only tensile loads.

    Figure2: 1. Galvanized Bridge Wire for Parallel Wire

    Bridge Cables.

    2. Galvanized Bridge Strand--consists of

    several bridge wires, of various diameters

    twisted together.

    3. Galvanized Bridge Rope--consists of six

    strands twisted around a strand core.

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    31/67

    Final year project

    18

    2.2.2 TYPES OF WIRE CABLES

    1. Parallel Wire Cables--This type of cable is made up of a large number of individual

    wires which are parallel to one another. Neither the cables nor the wires are twisted in

    any manner. The wire i6 shipped to the site of the bridge on reels and the individual

    wires are installed or' "spun" on the bridge and later compacted together to form a round

    cross section. Cables of this type are used on monumental structures, such as the Golden

    Gate Bridge and the George Washington Bridge.

    Figure3: Parallel Wire Cable

    2. Parallel Strand Cables, Closed Construction--These consist of several

    prefabricated Galvanized Bridge Strands, all laid parallel and in contact with one

    another. Wood or aluminum fillers are used to bring the cable to a circular cross-

    section, after which the whole cable is wrapped with wire for protection. The cable may

    contain 7, 19 37, 61, 91 or 127 strands.

    Figure 4: Detail of Main Cable and Cable Band The wrapping

    wire is omitted at the right for clarity. Note the

    closed construction and aluminum fillers.

    3. Parallel Strand Cables, Open Construction--This type of cable consists of several

    prefabricated Galvanized bridge Strands which are all laid parallel to one another and

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    32/67

    Final year project

    19

    not in contact. The strands are usually arranged in the form of a rectangle and the cable

    may contain 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 16, 20, 24 or 30 strands.

    4. Parallel Rope Cables, Open Construction--These are the same as Parallel Strand

    Cables except that Galvanized Bridge Rope is used in place of Bridge Strand.

    Figure 5: Close-up view of Main Cable, Cable Bend

    and Suspender Note the open construction.

    5. Single Rope or Single Strand Cables--These are used for small structures.

    Figure 6: Cable with Clip Type Cable Band and

    Suspender

    For many years the main cables of most suspension bridges, large and small, consisted

    of parallel wires installed individually at the site of the bridge. On small bridges thisproved to be an expensive procedure and consequently placed the suspension type

    bridge at an economic disadvantage for the shorter span crossings.

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    33/67

    Final year project

    20

    2.3 REINFORCED CONCRETE MATERIAL

    2.3.1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION

    Concrete is the most commonly used building material. It has being formed into any

    desired shape most conveniently. It is an artificial stone obtained by mixing aggregates,

    cement and water, and allowing the product to cure for hardening. Its essential

    ingredients are cement and water, which react with each other chemically, to form

    another material having useful strength. The strength of concrete depends upon the

    quality of its ingredient, their relative quantity and the manner in which they are mixed,

    compacted and cured. It is possible to produce concrete of different specifications for

    various purposes by suitably adjusting the proposition of cement aggregate and water.

    Reinforced concrete is a composite material made of concrete and steel. Plain

    concrete possesses high compressive strength but little tensile strength. Reinforcing

    steel possesses high compressive strength both in tension and compression. In

    reinforced concrete, steel provides the strength and the concrete provides the

    compressive strength. So, by combining these features and the concrete and steel, it

    attains high utility and versatility.

    2.3.2 CEMENT

    Cement is produced burning together, in a definite proportion; a mixture of siliceous

    (containing silica) argillaceous (containing alumina) and calcareous (containing lime)

    materials in particular fusion, at a temperature of 1400 to 1450oC.by doing so, a

    material called clinker is obtained. It is cooled and then ground to the required fineness

    to get cement. Different types of cement are obtained by varying the proposition of theraw materials and also by adding small percentage of other chemicals.

    Chemical composition of cement

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    34/67

    Final year project

    21

    The main raw materials for manufacturing cement are lime, silica, alumina and iron

    oxide. Depending upon the wide variety of raw materials used in the manufacture of

    cement, its oxide components vary widely.

    Types of cement

    A wide variety of cement is available which are suitable for use under certain condition

    due to its special properties. They are,

    1. Ordinary Portland cement

    2. Rapid hardening Portland cement

    3. Extra rapid hardening cement

    4. Low heat Portland cement

    5. Sulphate-resisting Portland cement

    6. Supersulphate cement

    7. Portland blast furnace cement

    8. Pozzolanic cement etc

    Physical properties of cement

    Following are important physical properties of cement.

    1. Chemical composition loss of ignition insoluble residues lime and alumina content magnesia content and sulphur content

    2. Fineness3. Formal consistency4. Setting time

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    35/67

    Final year project

    22

    5. Soundness6. Heat of hydration and Strength of cement.

    2.3.3 AGGREGATE

    A mixture only of water and cement is costly and possesses low strength and shrinks

    unacceptably on drying. In order to reduce the cost and modify such properties as the

    strength and drying shrinkage of the hardened mass, it is usual to introduce insoluble

    non-cementitious particles described as aggregates. Such aggregates usually constitute

    between 50 and 80% of the volume of conventional concrete and may thus greatly

    influence its properties.

    Aggregates should not contain any constituent which affect the hardening of the

    cement and durability of the hardened concrete adversely. It should be free from organic

    matter which reduces the hydraulic activity of cement and affects its normal setting and

    hardening. It should also be free from constituents whom decompose or change

    significantly in volume on exposure to atmosphere or react adversely cement paste.

    Physical properties of aggregates

    Following are the physical properties of aggregates

    1. Size of aggregates2. Shape of particles3. Surface texture4. Strength of coarse aggregates5. Specific gravity6. Bulk density7. Water absorption and surface moisture8. Bulking of sand9. Deleterious substance

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    36/67

    Final year project

    23

    10.Soundness and Durability.

    2.4 STRUCTURE OF WOOD

    2.4.1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION

    To utilize any structural materials to optimum effect it is necessary to understand its

    composition and structures since these can have a major influence on a materials

    properties. For timber this necessitates knowledge of the nature and growth patterns of

    trees, since the composition and the structures of wood derive from the requirements of

    the growing tree rather than the appreciation of the variations which occur between and

    within species, it should then be possible to specify timber correctly for any

    performance requirements.

    2.4.2 CLASSIFICATION OF TREES

    All commercial timber can be classified into two board groups:

    Softwoods and Hardwoods When first used in the Middle Ages these terms would have

    been indicate of the relative hardness, density or ease of working of the types of timber

    in common use, possibly comparing native oak with imported spruce for example

    (Ridout, 1992). Nowadays, however, the terms hardwood and softwood are quite

    misleading: balsa is a hardwood but is softer and less dense than any soft wood, while

    pitch, pine is softwood which is harder and denser than many hardwoods.

    2.5 COLUMNS

    2.5.1 INTRODUCTION ON COLUMNS

    Columns are structural elements used primarily to support compressive loads. They are

    usually square, rectangular, circular, L-shaped or octagonal in cross section.

    Column subjected to pure axial load are concentrically loaded column. Such columns

    rarely occur in practice. Generally they are subjected to moment along with axial load.

    If the moment acts about one axis only, they are classified as uneasily eccentrically

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    37/67

    Final year project

    24

    loaded columns. If the moments act about both axes, they are classified as biaxial

    loaded columns.

    2.4.2 CLASSIFICATION OF COLUMNS

    Classifications of column due to its construction material are:

    They are Metallic column, reinforced concrete column and brick column.

    Columns are also classified as pedestal, short, and slender column depending upon its

    effective length and lateral dimension. The effective length of column is the length

    between the points of inflection of the column. Very short column with effective length

    lesser than three times least lateral dimension are called pedestal columns. Column of

    intermediate length with effective length lesser than or equal to12 times least lateral

    dimension are called short columns. Columns of large length with effective length

    greater than 12 times the least lateral dimension are called long or slender columns.

    2.6 FOUNDATION

    2.6.1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION

    All structures on earth consist of superstructure and substructure. The foundation can be

    defined as the substructure which interfaces the superstructure and the supporting

    ground. Its purposes are to transfer all loads from the superstructure to the ground safely

    and provide stable base to the superstructure. It distributes the loads over a larger area

    so that pressure on the soil does not exceed its allowable capacity, the total settlement is

    limited to permissible value and differential settlement is minimum possible.

    These are different types of foundation for transfer of loads from superstructureto the ground. They depend primarily on the type and magnitude of the loads and the

    bearing capacity of the soil. Their behavior and design are described in this chapter.

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    38/67

    Final year project

    25

    2.6.2 FOUNDATIONS AND THE EARTH

    Foundations are the structures that connect the main structure with the ground. Forces

    do not end at the ends of a bridge. They do not even end at the boundaries of the

    foundations. In theory, they spread throughout the earth, getting weaker as the distanceincreases, though at some point they are so weak that they cannot be detected.

    Foundations must be made wide enough to reduce the stresses to values that the ground

    beyond can sustain indefinitely. The size and strength of foundations will depend on the

    quality of the ground. Over bridge and the famous Pisa campanile are examples where

    the combination of foundations and ground were less than ideal. The foundations may

    be deep underground, and in some cases under water as well, requiring the use of

    pneumatic caissons with sharp cutting edges, and pressurized air keep the water out.

    Eads' Mississippi Bridge and the Roeblings' Brooklyn Bridge are early examples of the

    use of caissons.

    If the weight of earth removed for foundations is greater than the weight of the structure

    supported, the foundations on average cannot settle, because the structure is floating.

    Nevertheless, a building might still tilt in these conditions, while not sinking overall.

    This principle of apostasy applies approximately to huge mountain ranges, whose roots

    go deep below the mean surface level of the earth. If glacier ice melts in large

    quantities, the rock below will start to rise, and in fact parts of the earth's surface are

    still moving slowly, and have been moving, since the end of the last ice age.

    It is in dam construction that knowledge of the ground is most important, because of the

    potential for great loss of life. The dam must be integrated into the rock to avoid

    leakage and uplift; extensive grouting is often required. Just as important is the huge

    weight of the water in the reservoir, and its effect on the rocks below and around. A

    terrible catastrophe resulted when water behind the Vajont dam penetrated the ground

    and enabled a large piece of a mountain slope to slide into the reservoir.

    2.6.3 TYPES OF FOUNDATION

    Foundations are classified as shallow and deep foundations. These are described as

    follows:

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    39/67

    Final year project

    26

    1. Shallow foundationit has a smaller depth limited to the width of footing. It spreads

    The load from superstructure on a larger area of the soil so that stress intensity is

    reduced to a value which can be carried safely by soil they are classified as isolated

    and combined footing.

    2.Deep foundation when the top layer of soil is too weak to support the structure on a

    Shallow foundation, the depth of foundation is increased till more suitable soil is

    found to support the structure. Such a foundation is termed as deep foundation

    because of its large depth. Different types of deep foundation are pile foundation and

    well foundation

    2.7 BEARING CAPACITY OF SOIL

    Bearing capacity of soil is the maximum intensity of load or pressure developed under

    the foundation without causing failure of soil and damaging settlement of superstructure

    supported on foundation. Therefore allowable bearing capacity is evaluated with an

    adequate factor of safety against ultimate bearing capacity of soil and adequate margin

    against excessive settlement. The ultimate capacity of soil corresponds to load beyond

    which settlement increases rapidly.

    Soil pressure at footing bases

    Actual soil pressure at the base of the infinitely stiff footing resting on ideal cohesion

    less and cohesive subsoil under a concentric load generally footings are not infinitely

    stiff and very few soils exhibit such behavior.

    2.8 LOADING

    Analysis of begins with the evaluation of the structures own weight and the loads to be

    supported, such loads are variable both in magnitude and some in position. In general,

    there are two types of loads which are dead and imposed loads.

    Another type of load frequently encountered in building is wind load which is the

    impact of the local wind on the structure. The wind speed is converted to force and the

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    40/67

    Final year project

    27

    effect on the structure is analyzed. This is common with tall structures such as tall

    buildings and bridges. Wind loads can also be combined with both dead and imposed

    loads.

    2.8.1 DEAD LOADS

    The dead loads are the weight of the structure its self, and the structural element such

    as ceiling, I beam, floor board, cladding, cables and permanent partitions, where panels

    and other equipments are permanently located they can be assumed as dead loads.

    2.8.2 IMPOSED LOADS

    These are loads to be carried by the structures and because of their nature are more

    different to be determined precisely. For many of them, it is only possible to make

    conservative estimates based on standard codes of practice or past experience.

    e.g.: imposed load for bridges: pedestrians, panels, vehicles, etc.

    For houses: its occupants, furniture, and presence of wind

    2.8.3 DESIGN STRESS

    This study is mostly concerned with two materials namely concrete and reinforcements.

    The steel used is round bars of high yield steel or high tensile bars. Concrete

    characteristics strength fck = 30KN/mm3. This value of fck is also minimum cube

    strength at 28 days. All Characteristics strength are given in DIN codes and British

    Standards; for mild steel rand bars, fyk=250N/mm2 while for high yield steel,

    fyk=420N/mm2.

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    41/67

    Final year project

    28

    CHAP III METHODOLOGY

    These data collection methods have been used to collect needed data:

    Observation:This method has been used to enable traffic study and collect some preliminary data at

    the selected site which would help in making conception, analysis as well as design of

    an economic flyover suspended pedestrian bridge and Providing detailed plans and

    drawings of final structure.

    Literature Survey :Internets and books have been used in order to get secondary data need for designing

    and getting the required calculations and formulas.

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    42/67

    Final year project

    29

    CHAP IV DESIGN OF FLYOVER SUSPENDED PEDESTRIAN

    BRDGE

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    43/67

    Final year project

    30

    4.1 DESIGN INFORMATION

    Properties of various materials to be used in design

    Concrete strength at 28 days 25 kN /m3 and fck, cyl=20 N/mm2,fck, cube= 30N/mm

    Timber 8 6 kN/m3 Steel rolled or cast 74 kN/m3

    Unit weight of various sheet materials

    Timber boards 0.15 kN/m2 Steel sheeting 0.15 kN/m2 Live load 5 kN/m2 Stair live 5 kN/m2 Imposed load 3 kN/m2 Allowable compression stress of column 210 kN/mm2 Allowable stress for cables 240 N/mm2 allowable shear stress for I beam 210 N/mm2 The assumed soil bearing capacity in Nyarugenge is 200 kN/m2 = 0.02

    kN/cm2.

    4.2 DESIGN THEORY

    The cable has a uniform weight and may also be subjected to a uniformly distributed

    load. The tension is assumed to be sufficiently great to that the sag f is not large. Since

    the curve is reasonably flat, the weight of the cable may be replaced, with the practical

    error by a uniform loading w, then

    - y = wc2/8TSince the curve is flat, the true length of cable is

    - L =c+Where from the following formulas:

    - = 8y2/3c

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    44/67

    Final year project

    31

    Figure 7: bridge span, UDL and flesh

    Where, l is the true length of the cable- y is deflection- w is load (kN/m)- C is span- T is tension force- is elongation

    In order to find the maximum force in cable that is better to have the horizontal

    component and vertical component.

    Horizontal component

    RCH

    = wL/8y and the vertical component

    RCV = wL/2

    Cable will exert the maximum stress. The maximum stress is obtained by the force per

    unit area which is equal to the allowable stress. The max force

    F max= {(wL/2)2+ (wL

    2/8y)}

    1/ 2

    And we know that the maximum stress = Max force/Area

    Or, Area = max force/max stress

    Where area A is the cross section of one suspended cable

    A = D2/4

    D is diameter of cable

    = 3.14

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    45/67

    Final year project

    32

    4.3 DESIGN OF MAIN CABLE DIAMETER

    Surface area of the moving space area 1.5m of width and lengthlof 15.2m

    Design parameters

    Floor surface area = 1.5*15.2= 21,28m2

    Deflection y=1.4m

    Number of main cable = 2 cables

    Working cable stress = 240 N/mm2

    Live load = 5 kN/ m2

    Timber boards = 0.15 kN/m2

    Imposed load = 3 kN/m2

    Design load

    Dead load = ((live load + timber board)*l)

    Where l is the of opposite distance of center to center of the span l = 1.4 /2 = 0.7 m

    Cis the span

    Dead load = ((5 + 0.15)*0.75) = 3.862 kN/m

    Balustrade =1.0 kN/m

    Imposed load = 3 kN*0.7 = 2.1 kN/m

    Total load = 3.862+1.0 = 4.862 kN/m

    Then design load = (4.862*1.4) + (2.1*1.6) = 10.17 kN/m

    W= 10.17 kN/m per cable span

    Figure 8.1: load diagram

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    46/67

    Final year project

    33

    Design of main cable diameter

    Reaction of horizontal componentRCH=wC2/8f

    RCH = 10.17*15.22/8*1.4 = 209.726 kN

    Reaction of vertical componentRCV = wL/2

    RCV= 10.17*15.2/2 = 77.292 kN

    Thus the maximum force = (RCV2+RCH

    2)

    1/2

    Fmax = (209.7262+77.292

    2)

    1/2= 223.515 kN

    Area = max force/max stress

    A = 223.515*103/240 = 931.31 mm

    2

    Then the diameter of main cable is equal to (931.31*4/3.14)1/2

    = 34.44 mm

    Take the cable diameter of 3.5 cm for each main cable.

    Figure 8.2: result of diagram cable

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    47/67

    Final year project

    34

    4.4 DESIGN OF TRUE LENGTH OF MAIN CABLES

    Calculation of true length

    - y = wL2/8TSince the curve is flat, the true length of cable is

    - l = L+Where from the following formulas

    - = 8y2/3LWhere, lthe true length of the cable- y is deflection- W is load ( kN/m)- L is span- elongation- l is true length

    Then, = 8*1.42/3*15.2 = 0.344 m

    Thusl=15.2 + 0.344 = 15.544 m

    The true length lof cable between the towers is 15.544m

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    48/67

    Final year project

    35

    4.5 DESIGN OF TRANSVERSAL AND LONGITUDINAL BEAMS

    4.5.1 DESIGN OF TRANSVERSAL

    Beam B1Beam support to carry lateral load which are resisted by bending and shear. However,

    deflections and local stresses are also important. Beam may be cantilever, simply

    supported, fixed ended or continuous. In this work we are going to use simply supported

    beam and is uniformly distributed load.

    Figure 9: transversal beam

    Design loadLive load = 5 kN/m

    2

    Timber structure = 0.15 kN/m2

    Imposed load = 3 kN/m2

    Dead load: 5+0.15 = 5.15 kN/m2

    Then, total load is 5.15*0.77 = 3.965 kN/m

    Where 0.77m is equal to the half of lateral distance of walkway

    Imposed load = 3 kN/m2*0.77 = 2.31 kN/m

    Design load = (3.965*1.4) + (2.31*1.6) = 9.247 kN/m

    Max moment = wL2/8

    Deflection = 5wL3/384EI

    w: is the design load

    L: is the considered length

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    49/67

    Final year project

    36

    I: is the moment of inertia and

    E: is the elasticity modulus

    Evaluation of beam reaction, shear force and bending moment

    Two end ReactionRA andRB = wL/2

    = 9.247*1.7/2 = 7.86 kN

    The resulting diagrams are shown in figure below. Beam B1 is standard case i.e. a

    simply supported beam with uniformly distributed load.

    M max = wL2/8

    =9.247*1.72/8 = 3.34 kNm

    Figure 10: load, shear, momentdiagram

    Let use a typical yield stress of yis 210 N/mm2(St 25) DIN 18800 German standard

    From equation required S = M max/y

    = 3.34*106/210*10

    3= 15.905 cm

    3

    Where S is plastic modulus

    UDL, Reaction and moment diagram for beam B1

    Use I 80 DIN 1025which have cross section area of 7.57 cm2

    Average shear stress = 7.86*103/7.57*10

    2= 10.515 N/mm

    2< 139N/mm

    2

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    50/67

    Final year project

    37

    Beam B2Design of beam in 1,4m of transversal distance from the towers

    Load on the Uniformly Distributed Load on beam

    5.15*0.89 = 4.584 kN/m

    Where 0.885m is equal to the half of perpendicular distance of the span and 1.7m is the

    length taken in design.

    Imposed load = 3 kN/m2*0.885 = 2.655 kN/m

    Design load = (4.584*1.4) + (2.655*1.6) = 10.07 kN

    Two end ReactionRA andRB = wL/2

    = 10.07*1.7/2 = 9.086 kN

    The resulting diagrams are shown in figure 10. Beam B1 is standard case i.e. a simply

    supported beam with uniformly distributed load.

    M max = WL2/8

    = 10.07*1.72/8 = 3.64 kN m

    From equation required S = M max/y

    = 3.64*106/210*10

    3 = 17.333 cm

    3 Try I 80 DIN 1025

    4.5.2 DESIGN LONGITUDINAL BEAMS

    Beam B3 of 1.4 m lengthDesign load

    Design of beam of 1,4m of longitudinal distance from the towers

    Load on the Uniformly Distributed Load on beam

    Live load = 5 kN/m2

    Timber structure = 0.15 kN/m2

    Imposed load = 3 kN/m2

    Dead load: 5+0.15 = 5.15 kN/m2

    Then, total load is 5.15*0.75 = 3.8625 kN/m

    Where 0.75m is equal to the half of lateral distance of walkway

    Imposed load = 3 kN/m2*0.75 = 2.25 kN/m

    Design load = (3.8625*1.4) + (2.25*1.6) = 9.007 kN/m

    Evaluation of beam reaction, shear force and bending moment

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    51/67

    Final year project

    38

    Two end ReactionRA andRB = wL/2

    = 9.007*0.894/2 = 4.026 kN

    The resulting diagrams are shown in figure below. Beam B3 is standard case i.e. a

    simply supported beam with uniformly distributed load.

    M max = wL2/8

    =9.007*1.42/8 = 2.207 kNm

    Figure 11: load, shear, moment diagram

    From equation required S = M max/y

    = 2.207*106/210*10

    3= 10.509 cm

    3

    Try I 80 DIN 1025 having area of 7.57 cm2

    Beam B3Design of beam of 0.77m length of longitudinal distance in 2.94m from the towers

    Load on the Uniformly Distributed Load on beam

    5.15*0.75 = 3.8625 kN/m

    Where 0.885m is equal to the half of perpendicular distance of the span and 1.7m is the

    length taken in design.

    Imposed load = 3 kN/m2*0.75 = 2.25 kN/m

    Design load = (3.8625 *1.4) + (2.25*1.6) = 9.007 kN

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    52/67

    Final year project

    39

    Two end ReactionRA andRB = wL/2

    = 9.007*0.77/2 = 3.467 kN

    The resulting diagrams are shown in figure 11. Beam B3 is standard case i.e. a simply

    supported beam with uniformly distributed load.

    M max = wL2/8

    = 9.007*0.772/8 = 0.667 kN m

    From equation required S = M max/y

    = 0.667*106/210*10

    3= 3.176 cm

    3

    Try I 80 DIN 1025 having area of 7.57 cm2

    4.6 DESIGN OF SUSPENDERS CABLE DIAMETER

    Design reaction in the suspenders is equal to the reaction in the beam floor

    Reaction or tension R = 10.22 kN

    Area = tension/max stress

    A = 10.22*103/240

    A = 45.583 mm2

    Then, cable diameter D = (45.583*4/3.14)1/2

    = 7.62 mm = 0.762 cm

    Take the cable diameter of 0.8cm for each suspender

    Figure 12: suspender cable diameter

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    53/67

    Final year project

    40

    4.7 DESIGN OF TOWERS

    Determination of the dimension of suitable standard universal columns

    Load in one tower is 77.292 kN

    Design load for 1 column 77.292 kN

    Length of the columns 6 m = 6000 mm

    The estimated Compressive strength at the member is 210 N/mm2

    Appropriate area = design load/estimated stress and the

    Actual stress = design load /actual area

    Figure 13: load column

    Design of one tower

    Approximate area = 77.292*103/210*10

    2= 3.68 cm

    2

    Checking of Deflection:

    Shear force = 5wL3/384EI

    Allowable shear force =L/325

    Actual shear force = 6000/325 = 18.46mm

    I = 384*52.9*18.46*102/ (5*77.292*6

    3) = 449.33 cm

    4

    Use I 140 DIN 1025

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    54/67

    Final year project

    41

    Figure 14: column and beam dimension

    4.8 DESIGN OF FOUNDATION

    Data

    Load w = 77.292 kN

    Concrete class c20/25gives:

    Use Soil bearing pressure of soil= 0.02 kN/cm2

    Compression resistance of concrete fck,cyl= 20 N/mm2, fck, cube= 25N/mm

    2

    Tension resistance of concrete fcy= 460 kN/cm2

    Calculation of DimensionRequired area of foundationA = w/soil

    A = 77.292/0.02 = 3864.6 cm2

    Use square foundation, width of pad bf = (3864.6)1/2

    =62.166 cm

    Take width bf of 63 cm.

    Depth of pad is equal to B*1/6

    D = 63/6 = 10.5 cm

    The depth of 10.5 is very small, so we can take D = 20 cm

    Use a foundation of B = 63 cm square and 20 cm deep

    Figure 15: foundation

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    55/67

    Final year project

    42

    ReinforcementFor concrete cover of 5 cm and assuming 1.0cm diameter bars, the effective depth d of

    the top layer of reinforcement is:

    d1= 10.5-5-1.0-0.5 = 4

    d2= 20-5-1.0-0.5 = 13.5 cm

    As = M max/0.9* d1*Rs

    Ground pressure, q = w/B2= 77.292/632= 0.01947 kN/cm2 = 194.7 kN/m2

    And maximum moment = p*lc*bf* (lc/2)

    0.02*24*63*24/2 = 362.88 kNcm

    As = 362.88*103/0.9*40*37.5 = 268.8 mm

    2

    Cross sectional area of one bars = 102*3.14/4 = 78.5

    Number of bars = 268.8*4/78.5= 3.424 bars

    Take 4 bars

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    56/67

    Final year project

    43

    Figure 16: Reinforcement in foundation

    Shear

    Shear across the pad:

    Actual Shear force 0.54*d2*bf*RbtActual shear force = q*bf* (lc- d2)

    = 0.02*63* (24-13.5) = 13.23 kN

    Actual Shear force 0.54*0.09*13.5*63

    13.23 < 41.33

    Proposed dimensions and reinforcement are satisfactory.

    Figure 17: distribution of bars

    4.9 DESIGN OF COLUMN BASE

    The column is axially loaded slab base; the column has 152*152*37 Kg which carries a

    total load of 77.292 adopting a square slab.

    The concrete strength is 30kN/mm2.

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    57/67

    Final year project

    44

    Design load = 77.292kN

    Area = 77.292*103/0.4*30

    = 5520.857 mm2

    Make the base of 600mm square.

    Pressure P = 77.292*103/600

    2

    P = 0.215 N/ mm2

    The arrangement of the column on the base plate is shown in figure below. From this

    Project base a =224 for all side

    Figure 18: base column

    Assume the thickness of plate is less 40mm. design strength = 265N/mm2(Table 6)

    The thickness of the base plate is given by:

    t = ((2.5*0215)/265*(2242-0.3*224

    2))

    Thickness t = 8.38 mm

    Design of thickness of welding

    Thickness of weld = 0.7* leg length

    Let assume the leg length = 1 cm

    Then, t = 1*0.7 = 0.7 cm

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    58/67

    Final year project

    45

    4.10 DESIGN OF STAIRS LONGITIDUNALY BEAMS

    Data

    Rise = 300 cm

    Going = 300 cm

    Waist = 250 cm

    Number of rise 12 risesSpan = 460 cm

    Loading

    Live load = 5 kN/m2

    Timber structure load = 0.15 kN/m2

    Imposed load = 3 kN/m2

    Dead load: 5+0.15 = 5.15 kN/m2

    Then, total load is 5.15*0.7 = 3.605 kN/m

    Where 0.70m is equal to the half of lateral distance of walkway of stairs

    Imposed load = 3 kN/m2*0.70 = 2.1 kN/m

    Design load = (3.605*1.4) + (2.1*1.6) = 7.14 kN/m

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    59/67

    Final year project

    46

    Figure 11: load, shear and moment diagram

    Calculation of negative moment

    Formulas used

    w = 7.14 kN/m

    MB * lAB + 2MB (lAB+ lBC ) + MC * lBC= -wlAB3/4-wlBC

    3/4

    MB*lBC+2 MC (lBC-0)+0 =-wlBC3/4

    2MB*5.475+ MC*2.58 = -7.14*(2.8953/3)-7.14*(2.58

    3/4)

    2.58 MB+ 2 MC*2.58 = -7.14*2.583/4

    10.95 MB+2.58 MC= -73.96 (*-2)

    2.58 MB+5.16 MC= -30.65 (*1)

    21.9 MB+5.16 MC= 147.92

    2.58 MB+5.16 MC= -30.65

    -19.32 MB= 117.27

    MB = - 6.069 kNm

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    60/67

    Final year project

    47

    MC = -2.91 kNm

    Calculation Positive moment

    Mx= Mo + Mn-1+ (Mn-Mn-1)/ln

    Mo= 7.14*2.8952/8 = 7.48 kNm

    MAB= 7.48+ (6.09*1.45/2.895) = 4.44 kNm

    Moo = 7.14*2.582/8 = 5.94 kNm

    MBC= 5.94-6.09 + ((-2.9+6.07)/2) = 1.43 kNm

    Then, to find out the dimension of beam we use the maximum moment

    Thus, M Max is Mo= 7.48 kNm

    Plastic modulus,

    S = M max/y

    = 7.48*106/210*103= 35.619 cm3

    Take I 140 DIN 1025 for each beam of beam

    4.11 DESIGN OF LATERAL BEAMS OF STAIRS

    Design load = 7.14 kN

    Evaluation of beam reaction, shear force and bending moment

    Two end ReactionRA andRB = wL/2

    = 7.14*1.4/2 = 4.998 kN

    The resulting diagrams are shown in figure below. Beam B3 is standard case i.e. a

    simply supported beam with uniformly distributed load.

    M max = wL2/8

    =7.14*1.42/8 = 1.75 kNm

    Figure 11: load, shear, moment diagram

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    61/67

    Final year project

    48

    From equation required S = M max/y

    = 1.75*106/210

    3= 8.33 cm

    3

    Try I 80 DIN 1025 having area of 7.57 cm2

    4.12 DESIGN OF SUPPORT COLUMN OF STAIRS

    Determination of the dimension of suitable standard universal columns

    Load in one column is =7.747 kN/m *

    Length of the columns 3.3 m = 3300 mm

    The estimated Compressive strength at the member is 100 N/mm2

    Appropriate area = design load/estimated stress and the

    Actual stress = design load /actual area

    Figure 20: stair column

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    62/67

    Final year project

    49

    Design of column

    Reaction at the support = wl2/2

    = 7.717*1.4/2 = 5.43 kN

    Approximate area = 5.43*103/210*10

    2= 0.26 cm

    2

    Checking of Deflection:Shear force = 5wL3/384EI

    Allowable shear force =L/325

    Actual shear force = 3300/325 = 10.15mm

    I = 384*52.9*10.15/ (5*5.43*100*3.33) = 21,132 cm

    4

    Use IPE 120

    4.13 DESIGN OF FOUNDATION FOR COLUMNS OF STAIRS

    Design data

    Load w = 5.43 kN

    Concrete class c20/25gives:

    Use Soil bearing pressure of soil= 0.02 kN/cm2

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    63/67

    Final year project

    50

    Compression resistance of concrete fck,cyl= 20 N/mm2, fck, cube= 25N/mm

    2

    Tension resistance of concrete fcy= 460 kN/cm2

    Required area of foundationA = w/soilA = 5.43/0.02 = 271.5 cm

    2

    Use square foundation, width of pad bf = (271.1)1/2

    =14.53 cm

    Take width bf of 20cm.

    Depth of pad is equal to B*1/6

    D = 20/6 = 3.3 cm

    The depth of 3.3 is very small, so we can take D = 20 cm

    Use a foundation of B = 20 cm square and 20 cm deep for each foundation of

    tower.

    4.14 DESIGN OF ANCHORAGE BLOCKS

    Figure 21: anchor and fixation of cable

    Source: hp: // www.google.com/design of suspended brigdes/anchorageA2

    Weight of one anchor block:

    WA= Tension in cable*cosine between cable and earth surface

    And Weight*DW> Tension *DT

    DW: horizontal distance

    DT:vertical inclined distance

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    64/67

    Final year project

    51

    Let assume DW = 1 m

    Max force or Tension in cable = 223.515 kN

    Angle = 590

    Then, WA = 223.515*cosine 590= 115.18 kN

    Thus, the weight 115.18 kN

    Weight*DW > Tension *DT

    115.18*1 > 223.515* DT

    DT = 1.94 m

    Use the anchor of vertical inclined distance of 1.94m and horizontal distance of 1.0m

    The volume of anchor =115.18/25 = 4.6 m3

    Surface area of bloc = 4.6/1.94sin600= 2.738 m2

    Where 1.94sin600is the true height

    Take a square base surface = (2.737)1/2= 1.65 m

    H = 1.68m, B = 1.65m, L =1.65, DT= 1.94m and DW= 1m

    4.15 DESIGN CONNECTIONS WITH BOLTS

    For ordinary bolt of grade 4.6 the value of shear stress given in table 30 of bs 5950: Part I: 2000

    as 160N/mm2

    For bolts the gross diameter is, of course, equal to the nominal diameter. Therefore the safe load

    in single shear, or single shear value (ssv)

    Shear stress = w/area of 1 bolt, i.e. 160 = w/ area of 1 bolt

    Where area of 1 bolt = 3.14*d2/4

    Data, for beams, maximum load = 7.48 kN

    Shear force = 160 N/mm2

    Then A = (7.48*103/160)1/2= 46.75mm2

    Diameter D = 7.717mm

    Use D = 8mm for each bolt.

    For column, maximum load is 77.292 kN

    Shear force = 160 N/mm2

    Then A = (77.292*103/160) = 483 mm2

    Because we have 4 bolts in the base of column

    One bolt has diameter D =12.4 mm

    Use D = 13 mm for each bolt

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    65/67

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    66/67

    Final year project

    53

    REFERENCES

    BOOKS USED:

    1. Foundation design and construction, M. J Tomlinson, sixth Edition, 1995,Addison Wesley Longman

    2. Steel work design guide to BS 9550: Part I: 1990, volume I, section propertiesand member, capacitors, fifth Edition, 1997, the Steel Construction Institute

    3. Structure steel work, design to limit state ,second edition4. Understanding structures analysis, material, design, second Edition, (1998),

    DEREK SEWARD (1998)

    INTERNETS:

    (http://www.google.com/analysis of suspension bridges) (May 2007)

    (http://www.google.com/unstiffened bridges) (May 2007)

    (http://www.google.com/Multiple-span bridges) (August 2007)

    (http://www.google.com/suspension bridges) (August 2007)

    (http://www.google.com/design of suspended brigdes/anchorageA2) (August 2007)

  • 8/13/2019 m 2008 Ceet 01 Ryoba Vuzimpundu Eugene Gs20031702

    67/67

    Final year project

    APPENDICES