LYNETTE LIM'S PORTFOLIO

25
PORTFOLIO UNIVERSITY YEARS Lynette Lim Suet Lei

description

University Years

Transcript of LYNETTE LIM'S PORTFOLIO

Page 1: LYNETTE LIM'S PORTFOLIO

PORTFOLIO UNIVERSITY YEARS

Lynette Lim Suet Lei

Page 2: LYNETTE LIM'S PORTFOLIO

Lynette Lim Suet LeiM. Arch NUS (2012)B. Arch NUS (2007-11)

[email protected]

Page 3: LYNETTE LIM'S PORTFOLIO

CONTENTS

Thesis:Towards an Optimised Fabrication Economy of Complex Forms (p.1 - 4)

Yr. 4The Temple of Wood (p.5 - 8)Modulating the Torus (p.9 - 12)

Yr.3Back to the Water (p.13-16)A Yoga Retreat (p.17- 20)

CV (p.21)

Page 4: LYNETTE LIM'S PORTFOLIO

Thesis: Towards an Optimised Fabrication Economy of Complex Forms

This investigation seeks to rationalise and better the efficiency of complex forms in architecture by studying in detail the manner of form ‘discretisation’, the process in which a complex form is broken down into components for construction and assembly. By understand-ing how lines can create geometry, this thesis seeks a method to break down complex form into repeated modules as far as possible, in order to increase material, time and cost efficiency.

The result is a transport hub to handle train, bus and pedestrian traffic, housing all three within a single flowing roof that can be pre-fabricat-ed with the least number of varying module types as possible.

Year 5 for M. Arch (2011/12) Under supervision of Shinya Okuda.

Page 5: LYNETTE LIM'S PORTFOLIO
Page 6: LYNETTE LIM'S PORTFOLIO
Page 7: LYNETTE LIM'S PORTFOLIO
Page 8: LYNETTE LIM'S PORTFOLIO

The Temple of Wood

An exploration of light and shadow, this project is initiated with the identification of a single module which can propagate to create space. The Temple of Wood is created from a single two pronged ‘fork’ combined to create a module that forms wall of various combinations, allowing varying effects and shadows on the spaces that result. The pavilion composed from these wall combinations creates a symphony of shadows throughout the day, with a different patterning at every hour.

Year 4 Semester I (AY2010/11) Under supervision of Joseph Lim.

Page 9: LYNETTE LIM'S PORTFOLIO
Page 10: LYNETTE LIM'S PORTFOLIO
Page 11: LYNETTE LIM'S PORTFOLIO
Page 12: LYNETTE LIM'S PORTFOLIO

Modulating the Torus

This project is a study of the geometry of the torus. Its proposal was for a sheltered lounge area for the architecture students of NUS, providing an area of respite from long nights in the studio. With the form of a torus lying on the sloping terrain, a fixed number of module types could re-create the entire surface. With digital fabrication, the eventual form could be vacuum-formed from 13 unique modules created by subtractive rapid prototyping. The stripping of the torus into its bare minimum gives a pattern of modules propagated to form its pure geometry.

Year 4 Semester II (AY2010/11) A group effort with Lee Rong Rong.Under supervision of Shinya Okuda.

Page 13: LYNETTE LIM'S PORTFOLIO

135//5

135//10135//15

135

150mm125mm100mm

OPTIMISING THE COMPONENTALSO WITH ALGOR SIMULATION ANALYSIS, INFORMED GEOMETRICAL CHANGES ARE MADE TO THE COMPONENT IN ORDER TO OPTIMISE ITS PERFORMANCE AND REDUCE MATERIAL USAGE.

549.92

3mm PVC

WOOD MOULD

THE COMPONENT ASSEMBLY

RIBS

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 1.2286 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.0286124 N/mm^2 MAX. STRESS VALUE: 0.310507 N/mm^2

MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.00661659 N/mm^2MAX. STRESS VALUE: 0.460554 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.623073 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 880.204 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.00661659 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 158.531 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 202.344 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 202.798 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 202.344 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 281.672 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 40228.4 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.753352 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 67460.5 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 1.82151 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 35001.574 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.67893 N/mm^2

1. FOLLOWS THAT OF TORUS 2. ARCS TO HAVE TWO PEAKING POINTS

3. ARCS FROM FOUR CORNERS TO PEAK AT CENTRE

1. PANEL WITH NO CORRUGATION 2. CORRUGATION IS INDENTED INTO PANEL SURFACE

3. CORRUGATION PROTRUDES FROM PANEL SURFACE

RIB DEPTH

PANEL PROFILE

PANEL CORRUGATION PROFILE

ANGLE OF CROSS SPIRAL

WOOD RIB FABRICATION

2400mm

1200

mm

135//5

135//10135//15

135

150mm125mm100mm

OPTIMISING THE COMPONENTALSO WITH ALGOR SIMULATION ANALYSIS, INFORMED GEOMETRICAL CHANGES ARE MADE TO THE COMPONENT IN ORDER TO OPTIMISE ITS PERFORMANCE AND REDUCE MATERIAL USAGE.

549.92

3mm PVC

WOOD MOULD

THE COMPONENT ASSEMBLY

RIBS

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 1.2286 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.0286124 N/mm^2 MAX. STRESS VALUE: 0.310507 N/mm^2

MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.00661659 N/mm^2MAX. STRESS VALUE: 0.460554 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.623073 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 880.204 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.00661659 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 158.531 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 202.344 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 202.798 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 202.344 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 281.672 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 40228.4 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.753352 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 67460.5 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 1.82151 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 35001.574 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.67893 N/mm^2

1. FOLLOWS THAT OF TORUS 2. ARCS TO HAVE TWO PEAKING POINTS

3. ARCS FROM FOUR CORNERS TO PEAK AT CENTRE

1. PANEL WITH NO CORRUGATION 2. CORRUGATION IS INDENTED INTO PANEL SURFACE

3. CORRUGATION PROTRUDES FROM PANEL SURFACE

RIB DEPTH

PANEL PROFILE

PANEL CORRUGATION PROFILE

ANGLE OF CROSS SPIRAL

WOOD RIB FABRICATION

2400mm

1200

mm

135//5

135//10135//15

135

150mm125mm100mm

OPTIMISING THE COMPONENTALSO WITH ALGOR SIMULATION ANALYSIS, INFORMED GEOMETRICAL CHANGES ARE MADE TO THE COMPONENT IN ORDER TO OPTIMISE ITS PERFORMANCE AND REDUCE MATERIAL USAGE.

549.92

3mm PVC

WOOD MOULD

THE COMPONENT ASSEMBLY

RIBS

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 1.2286 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.0286124 N/mm^2 MAX. STRESS VALUE: 0.310507 N/mm^2

MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.00661659 N/mm^2MAX. STRESS VALUE: 0.460554 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.623073 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 880.204 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.00661659 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 158.531 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 202.344 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 202.798 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 202.344 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 281.672 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 40228.4 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.753352 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 67460.5 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 1.82151 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 35001.574 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.67893 N/mm^2

1. FOLLOWS THAT OF TORUS 2. ARCS TO HAVE TWO PEAKING POINTS

3. ARCS FROM FOUR CORNERS TO PEAK AT CENTRE

1. PANEL WITH NO CORRUGATION 2. CORRUGATION IS INDENTED INTO PANEL SURFACE

3. CORRUGATION PROTRUDES FROM PANEL SURFACE

RIB DEPTH

PANEL PROFILE

PANEL CORRUGATION PROFILE

ANGLE OF CROSS SPIRAL

WOOD RIB FABRICATION

2400mm

1200

mm

135//5

135//10135//15

135

150mm125mm100mm

OPTIMISING THE COMPONENTALSO WITH ALGOR SIMULATION ANALYSIS, INFORMED GEOMETRICAL CHANGES ARE MADE TO THE COMPONENT IN ORDER TO OPTIMISE ITS PERFORMANCE AND REDUCE MATERIAL USAGE.

549.92

3mm PVC

WOOD MOULD

THE COMPONENT ASSEMBLY

RIBS

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 1.2286 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.0286124 N/mm^2 MAX. STRESS VALUE: 0.310507 N/mm^2

MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.00661659 N/mm^2MAX. STRESS VALUE: 0.460554 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.623073 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 880.204 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.00661659 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 158.531 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 202.344 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 202.798 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 202.344 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 281.672 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 40228.4 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.753352 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 67460.5 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 1.82151 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 35001.574 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.67893 N/mm^2

1. FOLLOWS THAT OF TORUS 2. ARCS TO HAVE TWO PEAKING POINTS

3. ARCS FROM FOUR CORNERS TO PEAK AT CENTRE

1. PANEL WITH NO CORRUGATION 2. CORRUGATION IS INDENTED INTO PANEL SURFACE

3. CORRUGATION PROTRUDES FROM PANEL SURFACE

RIB DEPTH

PANEL PROFILE

PANEL CORRUGATION PROFILE

ANGLE OF CROSS SPIRAL

WOOD RIB FABRICATION

2400mm

1200

mm

135//5

135//10135//15

135

150mm125mm100mm

OPTIMISING THE COMPONENTALSO WITH ALGOR SIMULATION ANALYSIS, INFORMED GEOMETRICAL CHANGES ARE MADE TO THE COMPONENT IN ORDER TO OPTIMISE ITS PERFORMANCE AND REDUCE MATERIAL USAGE.

549.92

3mm PVC

WOOD MOULD

THE COMPONENT ASSEMBLY

RIBS

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 1.2286 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.0286124 N/mm^2 MAX. STRESS VALUE: 0.310507 N/mm^2

MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.00661659 N/mm^2MAX. STRESS VALUE: 0.460554 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.623073 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 880.204 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.00661659 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 158.531 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 202.344 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 202.798 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 202.344 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 281.672 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 40228.4 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.753352 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 67460.5 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 1.82151 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 35001.574 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.67893 N/mm^2

1. FOLLOWS THAT OF TORUS 2. ARCS TO HAVE TWO PEAKING POINTS

3. ARCS FROM FOUR CORNERS TO PEAK AT CENTRE

1. PANEL WITH NO CORRUGATION 2. CORRUGATION IS INDENTED INTO PANEL SURFACE

3. CORRUGATION PROTRUDES FROM PANEL SURFACE

RIB DEPTH

PANEL PROFILE

PANEL CORRUGATION PROFILE

ANGLE OF CROSS SPIRAL

WOOD RIB FABRICATION

2400mm

1200

mm

135//5

135//10135//15

135

150mm125mm100mm

OPTIMISING THE COMPONENTALSO WITH ALGOR SIMULATION ANALYSIS, INFORMED GEOMETRICAL CHANGES ARE MADE TO THE COMPONENT IN ORDER TO OPTIMISE ITS PERFORMANCE AND REDUCE MATERIAL USAGE.

549.92

3mm PVC

WOOD MOULD

THE COMPONENT ASSEMBLY

RIBS

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 1.2286 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.0286124 N/mm^2 MAX. STRESS VALUE: 0.310507 N/mm^2

MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.00661659 N/mm^2MAX. STRESS VALUE: 0.460554 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.623073 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 880.204 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.00661659 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 158.531 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 202.344 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 202.798 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 202.344 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 281.672 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 40228.4 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.753352 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 67460.5 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 1.82151 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 35001.574 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.67893 N/mm^2

1. FOLLOWS THAT OF TORUS 2. ARCS TO HAVE TWO PEAKING POINTS

3. ARCS FROM FOUR CORNERS TO PEAK AT CENTRE

1. PANEL WITH NO CORRUGATION 2. CORRUGATION IS INDENTED INTO PANEL SURFACE

3. CORRUGATION PROTRUDES FROM PANEL SURFACE

RIB DEPTH

PANEL PROFILE

PANEL CORRUGATION PROFILE

ANGLE OF CROSS SPIRAL

WOOD RIB FABRICATION

2400mm

1200

mm

135//5

135//10135//15

135

150mm125mm100mm

OPTIMISING THE COMPONENTALSO WITH ALGOR SIMULATION ANALYSIS, INFORMED GEOMETRICAL CHANGES ARE MADE TO THE COMPONENT IN ORDER TO OPTIMISE ITS PERFORMANCE AND REDUCE MATERIAL USAGE.

549.92

3mm PVC

WOOD MOULD

THE COMPONENT ASSEMBLY

RIBS

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 1.2286 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.0286124 N/mm^2 MAX. STRESS VALUE: 0.310507 N/mm^2

MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.00661659 N/mm^2MAX. STRESS VALUE: 0.460554 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.623073 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 880.204 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.00661659 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 158.531 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 202.344 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 202.798 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 202.344 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 281.672 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 40228.4 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.753352 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 67460.5 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 1.82151 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 35001.574 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.67893 N/mm^2

1. FOLLOWS THAT OF TORUS 2. ARCS TO HAVE TWO PEAKING POINTS

3. ARCS FROM FOUR CORNERS TO PEAK AT CENTRE

1. PANEL WITH NO CORRUGATION 2. CORRUGATION IS INDENTED INTO PANEL SURFACE

3. CORRUGATION PROTRUDES FROM PANEL SURFACE

RIB DEPTH

PANEL PROFILE

PANEL CORRUGATION PROFILE

ANGLE OF CROSS SPIRAL

WOOD RIB FABRICATION

2400mm

1200

mm

DIG

ITA

L FA

BR

ICA

ITIO

N IN

AR

CH

ITE

CTU

RE

STU

DIO

| TU

TOR

: SH

INYA

OK

UD

AAY

2010

/201

1 S

EM

2 |

DTS

YE

AR

4 P

RO

GR

AM

| A

R41

03 |

DE

PAR

TME

NT

OF

AR

CH

ITE

CTU

RE

S

CH

OO

L O

F D

ES

IGN

AN

D E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

T | N

ATIO

NA

L U

NIV

ER

SIT

Y O

F S

ING

AP

OR

E

MODULATING THE TORUSAN EXPLORATION OF FORM AND GEOMETRY WITH THE USE OF ALGOR AND ECOTECT ANALYSIS TO OPTIMISE PERFORMANCETHE FORM OF THIS PROPOSAL FOLLOWS THAT OF THE TORUS, CUT AND TILTED ALONG THE GEOMETRY AND CONTOURS OF THE SITE. WITH THE USE OF THE AUTODESK ALGOR TOOL, THE DESIGN HAS UNDERGONE NUMEROUS STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS TO ALLOW INFORMED DECISIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF ITS COMPONENTS. THE EVOLUTION OF THE COMPONENT PANELS THUS FOLLOWS A NEGOTIATION BETWEEN THE MOST OPTIMAL OF A RANGE OF GIVEN GEOMETRIES AND THE LIMITS OF FABRICATION MEANS. THE PANELS THAT MAKE UP THIS FORM WILL BE OF PLASTIC, VACUUM FORMED AROUND ELEVEN PRECISE MOULDS THAT ARE FABRICATED BY SUBTRACTIVE RAPID PROTOTYPING. AS A SYSTEM, THE COMPONENTS ARE SUPPORTED WHERE NECESSARY WITH WOODEN RIBS THAT RUN THROUGH THECORRUGATIONS FORMED ON ITS SURFACE.

1 MODEL | RHINO

2 SIMULATION ANALYSIS | ALGOR

3 FABRICATION | SUBTRACTIVE RAPID PROTOTYPING

4 ASSEMBLY

THE PROCESSMETHOD OF FABRICATION: VACUUM FORMING

11 PANELS WHICH ADHERE TO THE LIMITS OF VACUUM FORMING DIMENSIONS 1200X550.THIS PROCESS GIVES ‘RIBS’ UNDER THE SURFACE, PROVIDING STRUCTURAL SUPPORT.

ANALYSING THE TORUS SURFACEWITH USE OF ALGOR TO UNDERSTAND THE STRESS THAT FORMS ON A TILTED TORUS SURFACE,

WOODEN RIBS ARE PLACED ALONG THE SECTORS OF THE FORM WHICH ARE UNDERTHE MOST STRESS, LENDING THE OVERALL FORM SUPPORT AT THOSE POINTS.

1138

.66

186.15

10

DIG

ITA

L FA

BR

ICA

ITIO

N IN

AR

CH

ITE

CTU

RE

STU

DIO

| TU

TOR

: SH

INYA

OK

UD

AAY

2010

/201

1 S

EM

2 |

DTS

YE

AR

4 P

RO

GR

AM

| A

R41

03 |

DE

PAR

TME

NT

OF

AR

CH

ITE

CTU

RE

S

CH

OO

L O

F D

ES

IGN

AN

D E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

T | N

ATIO

NA

L U

NIV

ER

SIT

Y O

F S

ING

AP

OR

E

MODULATING THE TORUSAN EXPLORATION OF FORM AND GEOMETRY WITH THE USE OF ALGOR AND ECOTECT ANALYSIS TO OPTIMISE PERFORMANCETHE FORM OF THIS PROPOSAL FOLLOWS THAT OF THE TORUS, CUT AND TILTED ALONG THE GEOMETRY AND CONTOURS OF THE SITE. WITH THE USE OF THE AUTODESK ALGOR TOOL, THE DESIGN HAS UNDERGONE NUMEROUS STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS TO ALLOW INFORMED DECISIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF ITS COMPONENTS. THE EVOLUTION OF THE COMPONENT PANELS THUS FOLLOWS A NEGOTIATION BETWEEN THE MOST OPTIMAL OF A RANGE OF GIVEN GEOMETRIES AND THE LIMITS OF FABRICATION MEANS. THE PANELS THAT MAKE UP THIS FORM WILL BE OF PLASTIC, VACUUM FORMED AROUND ELEVEN PRECISE MOULDS THAT ARE FABRICATED BY SUBTRACTIVE RAPID PROTOTYPING. AS A SYSTEM, THE COMPONENTS ARE SUPPORTED WHERE NECESSARY WITH WOODEN RIBS THAT RUN THROUGH THECORRUGATIONS FORMED ON ITS SURFACE.

1 MODEL | RHINO

2 SIMULATION ANALYSIS | ALGOR

3 FABRICATION | SUBTRACTIVE RAPID PROTOTYPING

4 ASSEMBLY

THE PROCESSMETHOD OF FABRICATION: VACUUM FORMING

11 PANELS WHICH ADHERE TO THE LIMITS OF VACUUM FORMING DIMENSIONS 1200X550.THIS PROCESS GIVES ‘RIBS’ UNDER THE SURFACE, PROVIDING STRUCTURAL SUPPORT.

ANALYSING THE TORUS SURFACEWITH USE OF ALGOR TO UNDERSTAND THE STRESS THAT FORMS ON A TILTED TORUS SURFACE,

WOODEN RIBS ARE PLACED ALONG THE SECTORS OF THE FORM WHICH ARE UNDERTHE MOST STRESS, LENDING THE OVERALL FORM SUPPORT AT THOSE POINTS.

1138

.66

186.15

10

MODEL ON SITEEXTERIOR

MODULATING THE TORUSAN EXPLORATION OF FORM AND GEOMETRY WITH THE USE OF ALGOR AND ECOTECT ANALYSIS TO OPTIMISE PERFORMANCETHE FORM OF THIS PROPOSAL FOLLOWS THAT OF THE TORUS, CUT AND TILTED ALONG THE GEOMETRY AND CONTOURS OF THE SITE. WITH THE USE OF THE AUTODESK ALGOR TOOL, THE DESIGN HAS UNDERGONE NUMEROUS STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS TO ALLOW INFORMED DECISIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF ITS COMPONENTS. THE EVOLUTION OF THE COMPONENT PANELS THUS FOLLOWS A NEGOTIATION BETWEEN THE MOST OPTIMAL OF A RANGE OF GIVEN GEOMETRIES AND THE LIMITS OF FABRICATION MEANS. THE PANELS THAT MAKE UP THIS FORM WILL BE OF PLASTIC, VACUUM FORMED AROUND ELEVEN PRECISE MOULDS THAT ARE FABRICATED BY SUBTRACTIVE RAPID PROTOTYPING. AS A SYSTEM, THE COMPONENTS ARE SUPPORTED WHERE NECESSARY WITH WOODEN RIBS THAT RUN THROUGH THECORRUGATIONS FORMED ON ITS SURFACE.

1 MODEL | RHINO

2 SIMULATION ANALYSIS | ALGOR

THE PROCESSMETHOD OF FABRICATION: VACUUM FORMING

11 PANELS WHICH ADHERE TO THE LIMITS OF VACUUM FORMING DIMENSIONS 1200X550.THIS PROCESS GIVES ‘RIBS’ UNDER THE SURFACE, PROVIDING STRUCTURAL SUPPORT.

ANALYSING THE TORUS SURFACEWITH USE OF ALGOR TO UNDERSTAND THE STRESS THAT FORMS ON A TILTED TORUS SURFACE,

WOODEN RIBS ARE PLACED ALONG THE SECTORS OF THE FORM WHICH ARE UNDERTHE MOST STRESS, LENDING THE OVERALL FORM SUPPORT AT THOSE POINTS.

1138

.66

186.15

10

MODEL ON SITEEXTERIOR

MODULATING THE TORUSAN EXPLORATION OF FORM AND GEOMETRY WITH THE USE OF ALGOR AND ECOTECT ANALYSIS TO OPTIMISE PERFORMANCETHE FORM OF THIS PROPOSAL FOLLOWS THAT OF THE TORUS, CUT AND TILTED ALONG THE GEOMETRY AND CONTOURS OF THE SITE. WITH THE USE OF THE AUTODESK ALGOR TOOL, THE DESIGN HAS UNDERGONE NUMEROUS STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS TO ALLOW INFORMED DECISIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF ITS COMPONENTS. THE EVOLUTION OF THE COMPONENT PANELS THUS FOLLOWS A NEGOTIATION BETWEEN THE MOST OPTIMAL OF A RANGE OF GIVEN GEOMETRIES AND THE LIMITS OF FABRICATION MEANS. THE PANELS THAT MAKE UP THIS FORM WILL BE OF PLASTIC, VACUUM FORMED AROUND ELEVEN PRECISE MOULDS THAT ARE FABRICATED BY SUBTRACTIVE RAPID PROTOTYPING. AS A SYSTEM, THE COMPONENTS ARE SUPPORTED WHERE NECESSARY WITH WOODEN RIBS THAT RUN THROUGH THECORRUGATIONS FORMED ON ITS SURFACE.

1 MODEL | RHINO

2 SIMULATION ANALYSIS | ALGOR

THE PROCESSMETHOD OF FABRICATION: VACUUM FORMING

11 PANELS WHICH ADHERE TO THE LIMITS OF VACUUM FORMING DIMENSIONS 1200X550.THIS PROCESS GIVES ‘RIBS’ UNDER THE SURFACE, PROVIDING STRUCTURAL SUPPORT.

ANALYSING THE TORUS SURFACEWITH USE OF ALGOR TO UNDERSTAND THE STRESS THAT FORMS ON A TILTED TORUS SURFACE,

WOODEN RIBS ARE PLACED ALONG THE SECTORS OF THE FORM WHICH ARE UNDERTHE MOST STRESS, LENDING THE OVERALL FORM SUPPORT AT THOSE POINTS.

1138

.66

186.15

10

DIG

ITA

L FA

BR

ICA

ITIO

N IN

AR

CH

ITE

CTU

RE

STU

DIO

| TU

TOR

: SH

INYA

OK

UD

AAY

2010

/201

1 S

EM

2 |

DTS

YE

AR

4 P

RO

GR

AM

| A

R41

03 |

DE

PAR

TME

NT

OF

AR

CH

ITE

CTU

RE

S

CH

OO

L O

F D

ES

IGN

AN

D E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

T | N

ATIO

NA

L U

NIV

ER

SIT

Y O

F S

ING

AP

OR

E

MODULATING THE TORUSAN EXPLORATION OF FORM AND GEOMETRY WITH THE USE OF ALGOR AND ECOTECT ANALYSIS TO OPTIMISE PERFORMANCETHE FORM OF THIS PROPOSAL FOLLOWS THAT OF THE TORUS, CUT AND TILTED ALONG THE GEOMETRY AND CONTOURS OF THE SITE. WITH THE USE OF THE AUTODESK ALGOR TOOL, THE DESIGN HAS UNDERGONE NUMEROUS STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS TO ALLOW INFORMED DECISIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF ITS COMPONENTS. THE EVOLUTION OF THE COMPONENT PANELS THUS FOLLOWS A NEGOTIATION BETWEEN THE MOST OPTIMAL OF A RANGE OF GIVEN GEOMETRIES AND THE LIMITS OF FABRICATION MEANS. THE PANELS THAT MAKE UP THIS FORM WILL BE OF PLASTIC, VACUUM FORMED AROUND ELEVEN PRECISE MOULDS THAT ARE FABRICATED BY SUBTRACTIVE RAPID PROTOTYPING. AS A SYSTEM, THE COMPONENTS ARE SUPPORTED WHERE NECESSARY WITH WOODEN RIBS THAT RUN THROUGH THECORRUGATIONS FORMED ON ITS SURFACE.

1 MODEL | RHINO

2 SIMULATION ANALYSIS | ALGOR

3 FABRICATION | SUBTRACTIVE RAPID PROTOTYPING

4 ASSEMBLY

THE PROCESSMETHOD OF FABRICATION: VACUUM FORMING

11 PANELS WHICH ADHERE TO THE LIMITS OF VACUUM FORMING DIMENSIONS 1200X550.THIS PROCESS GIVES ‘RIBS’ UNDER THE SURFACE, PROVIDING STRUCTURAL SUPPORT.

ANALYSING THE TORUS SURFACEWITH USE OF ALGOR TO UNDERSTAND THE STRESS THAT FORMS ON A TILTED TORUS SURFACE,

WOODEN RIBS ARE PLACED ALONG THE SECTORS OF THE FORM WHICH ARE UNDERTHE MOST STRESS, LENDING THE OVERALL FORM SUPPORT AT THOSE POINTS.

1138

.66

186.15

10

DIG

ITA

L FA

BR

ICA

ITIO

N IN

AR

CH

ITE

CTU

RE

STU

DIO

| TU

TOR

: SH

INYA

OK

UD

AAY

2010

/201

1 S

EM

2 |

DTS

YE

AR

4 P

RO

GR

AM

| A

R41

03 |

DE

PAR

TME

NT

OF

AR

CH

ITE

CTU

RE

S

CH

OO

L O

F D

ES

IGN

AN

D E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

T | N

ATIO

NA

L U

NIV

ER

SIT

Y O

F S

ING

AP

OR

E

MODULATING THE TORUSAN EXPLORATION OF FORM AND GEOMETRY WITH THE USE OF ALGOR AND ECOTECT ANALYSIS TO OPTIMISE PERFORMANCETHE FORM OF THIS PROPOSAL FOLLOWS THAT OF THE TORUS, CUT AND TILTED ALONG THE GEOMETRY AND CONTOURS OF THE SITE. WITH THE USE OF THE AUTODESK ALGOR TOOL, THE DESIGN HAS UNDERGONE NUMEROUS STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS TO ALLOW INFORMED DECISIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF ITS COMPONENTS. THE EVOLUTION OF THE COMPONENT PANELS THUS FOLLOWS A NEGOTIATION BETWEEN THE MOST OPTIMAL OF A RANGE OF GIVEN GEOMETRIES AND THE LIMITS OF FABRICATION MEANS. THE PANELS THAT MAKE UP THIS FORM WILL BE OF PLASTIC, VACUUM FORMED AROUND ELEVEN PRECISE MOULDS THAT ARE FABRICATED BY SUBTRACTIVE RAPID PROTOTYPING. AS A SYSTEM, THE COMPONENTS ARE SUPPORTED WHERE NECESSARY WITH WOODEN RIBS THAT RUN THROUGH THECORRUGATIONS FORMED ON ITS SURFACE.

1 MODEL | RHINO

2 SIMULATION ANALYSIS | ALGOR

3 FABRICATION | SUBTRACTIVE RAPID PROTOTYPING

4 ASSEMBLY

THE PROCESSMETHOD OF FABRICATION: VACUUM FORMING

11 PANELS WHICH ADHERE TO THE LIMITS OF VACUUM FORMING DIMENSIONS 1200X550.THIS PROCESS GIVES ‘RIBS’ UNDER THE SURFACE, PROVIDING STRUCTURAL SUPPORT.

ANALYSING THE TORUS SURFACEWITH USE OF ALGOR TO UNDERSTAND THE STRESS THAT FORMS ON A TILTED TORUS SURFACE,

WOODEN RIBS ARE PLACED ALONG THE SECTORS OF THE FORM WHICH ARE UNDERTHE MOST STRESS, LENDING THE OVERALL FORM SUPPORT AT THOSE POINTS.

1138

.66

186.15

10

Page 14: LYNETTE LIM'S PORTFOLIO

EXPLODED AXONOMETRIC SCALE 1:50

1. CONCRETE FOOTING JOINING PANELS AND EXISTING SCHOOL BUILDING 2. 10mm L-PLATE, 5mm METAL BOLT3. VACUUM FORMED COMPONENT PANEL4. 5mm METAL BOLT5. 2 INTERLOCKED 12mm PLYWOOD RIBS6. CONCRETE FOOTING TO GROUND

FABRICATION AND ASSEMBLY

ONE. THE MOULDS | SUBTRACTIVE RAPID PROTOTYPING

TWO. THE COMPONENT PANELS | VACUUM FORMING WITH MOULDS

THREE. ASSEMBLY OF COMPONENT PANELS

FOUR. ASSEMBLY OF PANELS WITH WOOD RIB

FINAL COMPONENT DESIGN

12

3

5

4

6 1

ELEVATIONSCALE 1:50

SECTIONSCALE 1:50

EXPLODED AXONOMETRIC SCALE 1:50

1. CONCRETE FOOTING JOINING PANELS AND EXISTING SCHOOL BUILDING 2. 10mm L-PLATE, 5mm METAL BOLT3. VACUUM FORMED COMPONENT PANEL4. 5mm METAL BOLT5. 2 INTERLOCKED 12mm PLYWOOD RIBS6. CONCRETE FOOTING TO GROUND

FABRICATION AND ASSEMBLY

ONE. THE MOULDS | SUBTRACTIVE RAPID PROTOTYPING

TWO. THE COMPONENT PANELS | VACUUM FORMING WITH MOULDS

THREE. ASSEMBLY OF COMPONENT PANELS

FOUR. ASSEMBLY OF PANELS WITH WOOD RIB

FINAL COMPONENT DESIGN

12

3

5

4

6 1

PANEL GUTTER ASSEMBLY DETAIL1. ALIGN PANEL A AGAINST PANEL B WITH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B DOWN

2. FOLD GUTTER FLAP OF PANEL B UP TO CLASP THE SIDE OF PANEL A

3. BOLT THROUGH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B, THE SIDE OF A, THEN THE SIDE OF PANEL B.

INTERIOR RENDERS

1

23

PANEL AND WOOD RIB DETAIL1. 24mm PLYWOOD RIB2. 3mm PVC PLASTIC COMPONENT3. 5mm METAL BOLT

12

A B

A

B1

2

FINAL COMPONENT DESIGN

SITE PLANSCALE 1:300

FLOOR PLANSCALE 1:100

ROOF PLANSCALE 1:50

PANEL GUTTER ASSEMBLY DETAIL1. ALIGN PANEL A AGAINST PANEL B WITH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B DOWN

2. FOLD GUTTER FLAP OF PANEL B UP TO CLASP THE SIDE OF PANEL A

3. BOLT THROUGH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B, THE SIDE OF A, THEN THE SIDE OF PANEL B.

INTERIOR RENDERS

1

23

PANEL AND WOOD RIB DETAIL1. 24mm PLYWOOD RIB2. 3mm PVC PLASTIC COMPONENT3. 5mm METAL BOLT

12

A B

A

1

2

FINAL COMPONENT DESIGN

PANEL GUTTER ASSEMBLY DETAIL1. ALIGN PANEL A AGAINST PANEL B WITH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B DOWN

2. FOLD GUTTER FLAP OF PANEL B UP TO CLASP THE SIDE OF PANEL A

3. BOLT THROUGH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B, THE SIDE OF A, THEN THE SIDE OF PANEL B.

INTERIOR RENDERS

1

23

PANEL AND WOOD RIB DETAIL1. 24mm PLYWOOD RIB2. 3mm PVC PLASTIC COMPONENT3. 5mm METAL BOLT

12

A B

FINAL COMPONENT DESIGN

FLOOR PLANSCALE 1:100

ROOF PLANSCALE 1:50

PANEL GUTTER ASSEMBLY DETAIL1. ALIGN PANEL A AGAINST PANEL B WITH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B DOWN

2. FOLD GUTTER FLAP OF PANEL B UP TO CLASP THE SIDE OF PANEL A

3. BOLT THROUGH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B, THE SIDE OF A, THEN THE SIDE OF PANEL B.

INTERIOR RENDERS

1

23

PANEL AND WOOD RIB DETAIL1. 24mm PLYWOOD RIB2. 3mm PVC PLASTIC COMPONENT3. 5mm METAL BOLT

12

A B

A

B1

2

FLOOR PLANSCALE 1:100

ROOF PLANSCALE 1:50

PANEL GUTTER ASSEMBLY DETAIL1. ALIGN PANEL A AGAINST PANEL B WITH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B DOWN

2. FOLD GUTTER FLAP OF PANEL B UP TO CLASP THE SIDE OF PANEL A

3. BOLT THROUGH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B, THE SIDE OF A, THEN THE SIDE OF PANEL B.

INTERIOR RENDERS

1

23

PANEL AND WOOD RIB DETAIL1. 24mm PLYWOOD RIB2. 3mm PVC PLASTIC COMPONENT3. 5mm METAL BOLT

12

A B

FINAL COMPONENT DESIGN

FLOOR PLANSCALE 1:100

ROOF PLANSCALE 1:50

PANEL GUTTER ASSEMBLY DETAIL1. ALIGN PANEL A AGAINST PANEL B WITH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B DOWN

2. FOLD GUTTER FLAP OF PANEL B UP TO CLASP THE SIDE OF PANEL A

3. BOLT THROUGH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B, THE SIDE OF A, THEN THE SIDE OF PANEL B.

INTERIOR RENDERS

1

23

PANEL AND WOOD RIB DETAIL1. 24mm PLYWOOD RIB2. 3mm PVC PLASTIC COMPONENT3. 5mm METAL BOLT

12

A B

A

B1

2

FLOOR PLANSCALE 1:100

ROOF PLANSCALE 1:50

PANEL GUTTER ASSEMBLY DETAIL1. ALIGN PANEL A AGAINST PANEL B WITH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B DOWN

2. FOLD GUTTER FLAP OF PANEL B UP TO CLASP THE SIDE OF PANEL A

3. BOLT THROUGH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B, THE SIDE OF A, THEN THE SIDE OF PANEL B.

INTERIOR RENDERS

1

23

PANEL AND WOOD RIB DETAIL1. 24mm PLYWOOD RIB2. 3mm PVC PLASTIC COMPONENT3. 5mm METAL BOLT

12

A B

FINAL COMPONENT DESIGN

FLOOR PLANSCALE 1:100

ROOF PLANSCALE 1:50

PANEL GUTTER ASSEMBLY DETAIL1. ALIGN PANEL A AGAINST PANEL B WITH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B DOWN

2. FOLD GUTTER FLAP OF PANEL B UP TO CLASP THE SIDE OF PANEL A

3. BOLT THROUGH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B, THE SIDE OF A, THEN THE SIDE OF PANEL B.

INTERIOR RENDERS

1

23

PANEL AND WOOD RIB DETAIL1. 24mm PLYWOOD RIB2. 3mm PVC PLASTIC COMPONENT3. 5mm METAL BOLT

12

A B

A

B1

2

FLOOR PLANSCALE 1:100

ROOF PLANSCALE 1:50

EXPLODED AXONOMETRIC SCALE 1:50

1. CONCRETE FOOTING JOINING PANELS AND EXISTING SCHOOL BUILDING 2. 10mm L-PLATE, 5mm METAL BOLT3. VACUUM FORMED COMPONENT PANEL4. 5mm METAL BOLT5. 2 INTERLOCKED 12mm PLYWOOD RIBS6. CONCRETE FOOTING TO GROUND

FABRICATION AND ASSEMBLY

ONE. THE MOULDS | SUBTRACTIVE RAPID PROTOTYPING

TWO. THE COMPONENT PANELS | VACUUM FORMING WITH MOULDS

THREE. ASSEMBLY OF COMPONENT PANELS

FOUR. ASSEMBLY OF PANELS WITH WOOD RIB

FINAL COMPONENT DESIGN

12

3

5

4

6 1

ELEVATIONSCALE 1:50

SECTIONSCALE 1:50

EXPLODED AXONOMETRIC SCALE 1:50

1. CONCRETE FOOTING JOINING PANELS AND EXISTING SCHOOL BUILDING 2. 10mm L-PLATE, 5mm METAL BOLT3. VACUUM FORMED COMPONENT PANEL4. 5mm METAL BOLT5. 2 INTERLOCKED 12mm PLYWOOD RIBS6. CONCRETE FOOTING TO GROUND

FABRICATION AND ASSEMBLY

ONE. THE MOULDS | SUBTRACTIVE RAPID PROTOTYPING

TWO. THE COMPONENT PANELS | VACUUM FORMING WITH MOULDS

THREE. ASSEMBLY OF COMPONENT PANELS

FOUR. ASSEMBLY OF PANELS WITH WOOD RIB

FINAL COMPONENT DESIGN

12

3

5

4

6 1

PANEL GUTTER ASSEMBLY DETAIL1. ALIGN PANEL A AGAINST PANEL B WITH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B DOWN

2. FOLD GUTTER FLAP OF PANEL B UP TO CLASP THE SIDE OF PANEL A

3. BOLT THROUGH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B, THE SIDE OF A, THEN THE SIDE OF PANEL B.

INTERIOR RENDERS

1

23

PANEL AND WOOD RIB DETAIL1. 24mm PLYWOOD RIB2. 3mm PVC PLASTIC COMPONENT3. 5mm METAL BOLT

12

A B

A

B1

2

FINAL COMPONENT DESIGN

SITE PLANSCALE 1:300

FLOOR PLANSCALE 1:100

ROOF PLANSCALE 1:50

PANEL GUTTER ASSEMBLY DETAIL1. ALIGN PANEL A AGAINST PANEL B WITH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B DOWN

2. FOLD GUTTER FLAP OF PANEL B UP TO CLASP THE SIDE OF PANEL A

3. BOLT THROUGH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B, THE SIDE OF A, THEN THE SIDE OF PANEL B.

INTERIOR RENDERS

1

23

PANEL AND WOOD RIB DETAIL1. 24mm PLYWOOD RIB2. 3mm PVC PLASTIC COMPONENT3. 5mm METAL BOLT

12

A B

A

1

2

FINAL COMPONENT DESIGN

135//5

135//10135//15

135

150mm125mm100mm

OPTIMISING THE COMPONENTALSO WITH ALGOR SIMULATION ANALYSIS, INFORMED GEOMETRICAL CHANGES ARE MADE TO THE COMPONENT IN ORDER TO OPTIMISE ITS PERFORMANCE AND REDUCE MATERIAL USAGE.

549.92

3mm PVC

WOOD MOULD

THE COMPONENT ASSEMBLY

RIBS

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 1.2286 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.0286124 N/mm^2 MAX. STRESS VALUE: 0.310507 N/mm^2

MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.00661659 N/mm^2MAX. STRESS VALUE: 0.460554 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.623073 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 880.204 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.00661659 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 158.531 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 202.344 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 202.798 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 202.344 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 281.672 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 40228.4 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.753352 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 67460.5 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 1.82151 N/mm^2

MAX. STRESS VALUE: 35001.574 N/mm^2MIN. STRESS VALUE: 0.67893 N/mm^2

1. FOLLOWS THAT OF TORUS 2. ARCS TO HAVE TWO PEAKING POINTS

3. ARCS FROM FOUR CORNERS TO PEAK AT CENTRE

1. PANEL WITH NO CORRUGATION 2. CORRUGATION IS INDENTED INTO PANEL SURFACE

3. CORRUGATION PROTRUDES FROM PANEL SURFACE

RIB DEPTH

PANEL PROFILE

PANEL CORRUGATION PROFILE

ANGLE OF CROSS SPIRAL

WOOD RIB FABRICATION

2400mm

1200

mm

ELEVATIONSCALE 1:50

Page 15: LYNETTE LIM'S PORTFOLIO

EXPLODED AXONOMETRIC SCALE 1:50

1. CONCRETE FOOTING JOINING PANELS AND EXISTING SCHOOL BUILDING 2. 10mm L-PLATE, 5mm METAL BOLT3. VACUUM FORMED COMPONENT PANEL4. 5mm METAL BOLT5. 2 INTERLOCKED 12mm PLYWOOD RIBS6. CONCRETE FOOTING TO GROUND

FABRICATION AND ASSEMBLY

ONE. THE MOULDS | SUBTRACTIVE RAPID PROTOTYPING

TWO. THE COMPONENT PANELS | VACUUM FORMING WITH MOULDS

THREE. ASSEMBLY OF COMPONENT PANELS

FOUR. ASSEMBLY OF PANELS WITH WOOD RIB

FINAL COMPONENT DESIGN

12

3

5

4

6 1

ELEVATIONSCALE 1:50

SECTIONSCALE 1:50

EXPLODED AXONOMETRIC SCALE 1:50

1. CONCRETE FOOTING JOINING PANELS AND EXISTING SCHOOL BUILDING 2. 10mm L-PLATE, 5mm METAL BOLT3. VACUUM FORMED COMPONENT PANEL4. 5mm METAL BOLT5. 2 INTERLOCKED 12mm PLYWOOD RIBS6. CONCRETE FOOTING TO GROUND

FABRICATION AND ASSEMBLY

ONE. THE MOULDS | SUBTRACTIVE RAPID PROTOTYPING

TWO. THE COMPONENT PANELS | VACUUM FORMING WITH MOULDS

THREE. ASSEMBLY OF COMPONENT PANELS

FOUR. ASSEMBLY OF PANELS WITH WOOD RIB

FINAL COMPONENT DESIGN

12

3

5

4

6 1

PANEL GUTTER ASSEMBLY DETAIL1. ALIGN PANEL A AGAINST PANEL B WITH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B DOWN

2. FOLD GUTTER FLAP OF PANEL B UP TO CLASP THE SIDE OF PANEL A

3. BOLT THROUGH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B, THE SIDE OF A, THEN THE SIDE OF PANEL B.

INTERIOR RENDERS

1

23

PANEL AND WOOD RIB DETAIL1. 24mm PLYWOOD RIB2. 3mm PVC PLASTIC COMPONENT3. 5mm METAL BOLT

12

A B

A

B1

2

FINAL COMPONENT DESIGN

SITE PLANSCALE 1:300

FLOOR PLANSCALE 1:100

ROOF PLANSCALE 1:50

PANEL GUTTER ASSEMBLY DETAIL1. ALIGN PANEL A AGAINST PANEL B WITH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B DOWN

2. FOLD GUTTER FLAP OF PANEL B UP TO CLASP THE SIDE OF PANEL A

3. BOLT THROUGH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B, THE SIDE OF A, THEN THE SIDE OF PANEL B.

INTERIOR RENDERS

1

23

PANEL AND WOOD RIB DETAIL1. 24mm PLYWOOD RIB2. 3mm PVC PLASTIC COMPONENT3. 5mm METAL BOLT

12

A B

A

1

2

FINAL COMPONENT DESIGN

EXPLODED AXONOMETRIC SCALE 1:50

1. CONCRETE FOOTING JOINING PANELS AND EXISTING SCHOOL BUILDING 2. 10mm L-PLATE, 5mm METAL BOLT3. VACUUM FORMED COMPONENT PANEL4. 5mm METAL BOLT5. 2 INTERLOCKED 12mm PLYWOOD RIBS6. CONCRETE FOOTING TO GROUND

FABRICATION AND ASSEMBLY

ONE. THE MOULDS | SUBTRACTIVE RAPID PROTOTYPING

TWO. THE COMPONENT PANELS | VACUUM FORMING WITH MOULDS

THREE. ASSEMBLY OF COMPONENT PANELS

FOUR. ASSEMBLY OF PANELS WITH WOOD RIB

FINAL COMPONENT DESIGN

12

3

5

4

6 1

ELEVATIONSCALE 1:50

SECTIONSCALE 1:50

EXPLODED AXONOMETRIC SCALE 1:50

1. CONCRETE FOOTING JOINING PANELS AND EXISTING SCHOOL BUILDING 2. 10mm L-PLATE, 5mm METAL BOLT3. VACUUM FORMED COMPONENT PANEL4. 5mm METAL BOLT5. 2 INTERLOCKED 12mm PLYWOOD RIBS6. CONCRETE FOOTING TO GROUND

FABRICATION AND ASSEMBLY

ONE. THE MOULDS | SUBTRACTIVE RAPID PROTOTYPING

TWO. THE COMPONENT PANELS | VACUUM FORMING WITH MOULDS

THREE. ASSEMBLY OF COMPONENT PANELS

FOUR. ASSEMBLY OF PANELS WITH WOOD RIB

FINAL COMPONENT DESIGN

12

3

5

4

6 1

PANEL GUTTER ASSEMBLY DETAIL1. ALIGN PANEL A AGAINST PANEL B WITH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B DOWN

2. FOLD GUTTER FLAP OF PANEL B UP TO CLASP THE SIDE OF PANEL A

3. BOLT THROUGH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B, THE SIDE OF A, THEN THE SIDE OF PANEL B.

INTERIOR RENDERS

1

23

PANEL AND WOOD RIB DETAIL1. 24mm PLYWOOD RIB2. 3mm PVC PLASTIC COMPONENT3. 5mm METAL BOLT

12

A B

A

B1

2

FINAL COMPONENT DESIGN

SITE PLANSCALE 1:300

FLOOR PLANSCALE 1:100

ROOF PLANSCALE 1:50

PANEL GUTTER ASSEMBLY DETAIL1. ALIGN PANEL A AGAINST PANEL B WITH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B DOWN

2. FOLD GUTTER FLAP OF PANEL B UP TO CLASP THE SIDE OF PANEL A

3. BOLT THROUGH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B, THE SIDE OF A, THEN THE SIDE OF PANEL B.

INTERIOR RENDERS

1

23

PANEL AND WOOD RIB DETAIL1. 24mm PLYWOOD RIB2. 3mm PVC PLASTIC COMPONENT3. 5mm METAL BOLT

12

A B

A

1

2

FINAL COMPONENT DESIGN

PANEL GUTTER ASSEMBLY DETAIL1. ALIGN PANEL A AGAINST PANEL B WITH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B DOWN

2. FOLD GUTTER FLAP OF PANEL B UP TO CLASP THE SIDE OF PANEL A

3. BOLT THROUGH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B, THE SIDE OF A, THEN THE SIDE OF PANEL B.

INTERIOR RENDERS

1

23

PANEL AND WOOD RIB DETAIL1. 24mm PLYWOOD RIB2. 3mm PVC PLASTIC COMPONENT3. 5mm METAL BOLT

12

A B

FINAL COMPONENT DESIGN

FLOOR PLANSCALE 1:100

ROOF PLANSCALE 1:50

PANEL GUTTER ASSEMBLY DETAIL1. ALIGN PANEL A AGAINST PANEL B WITH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B DOWN

2. FOLD GUTTER FLAP OF PANEL B UP TO CLASP THE SIDE OF PANEL A

3. BOLT THROUGH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B, THE SIDE OF A, THEN THE SIDE OF PANEL B.

INTERIOR RENDERS

1

23

PANEL AND WOOD RIB DETAIL1. 24mm PLYWOOD RIB2. 3mm PVC PLASTIC COMPONENT3. 5mm METAL BOLT

12

A B

A

B1

2

FLOOR PLANSCALE 1:100

ROOF PLANSCALE 1:50

EXPLODED AXONOMETRIC SCALE 1:50

1. CONCRETE FOOTING JOINING PANELS AND EXISTING SCHOOL BUILDING 2. 10mm L-PLATE, 5mm METAL BOLT3. VACUUM FORMED COMPONENT PANEL4. 5mm METAL BOLT5. 2 INTERLOCKED 12mm PLYWOOD RIBS6. CONCRETE FOOTING TO GROUND

FABRICATION AND ASSEMBLY

ONE. THE MOULDS | SUBTRACTIVE RAPID PROTOTYPING

TWO. THE COMPONENT PANELS | VACUUM FORMING WITH MOULDS

THREE. ASSEMBLY OF COMPONENT PANELS

FOUR. ASSEMBLY OF PANELS WITH WOOD RIB

FINAL COMPONENT DESIGN

12

3

5

4

6 1

ELEVATIONSCALE 1:50

SECTIONSCALE 1:50

EXPLODED AXONOMETRIC SCALE 1:50

1. CONCRETE FOOTING JOINING PANELS AND EXISTING SCHOOL BUILDING 2. 10mm L-PLATE, 5mm METAL BOLT3. VACUUM FORMED COMPONENT PANEL4. 5mm METAL BOLT5. 2 INTERLOCKED 12mm PLYWOOD RIBS6. CONCRETE FOOTING TO GROUND

FABRICATION AND ASSEMBLY

ONE. THE MOULDS | SUBTRACTIVE RAPID PROTOTYPING

TWO. THE COMPONENT PANELS | VACUUM FORMING WITH MOULDS

THREE. ASSEMBLY OF COMPONENT PANELS

FOUR. ASSEMBLY OF PANELS WITH WOOD RIB

FINAL COMPONENT DESIGN

12

3

5

4

6 1

PANEL GUTTER ASSEMBLY DETAIL1. ALIGN PANEL A AGAINST PANEL B WITH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B DOWN

2. FOLD GUTTER FLAP OF PANEL B UP TO CLASP THE SIDE OF PANEL A

3. BOLT THROUGH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B, THE SIDE OF A, THEN THE SIDE OF PANEL B.

INTERIOR RENDERS

1

23

PANEL AND WOOD RIB DETAIL1. 24mm PLYWOOD RIB2. 3mm PVC PLASTIC COMPONENT3. 5mm METAL BOLT

12

A B

A

B1

2

FINAL COMPONENT DESIGN

SITE PLANSCALE 1:300

FLOOR PLANSCALE 1:100

ROOF PLANSCALE 1:50

PANEL GUTTER ASSEMBLY DETAIL1. ALIGN PANEL A AGAINST PANEL B WITH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B DOWN

2. FOLD GUTTER FLAP OF PANEL B UP TO CLASP THE SIDE OF PANEL A

3. BOLT THROUGH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B, THE SIDE OF A, THEN THE SIDE OF PANEL B.

INTERIOR RENDERS

1

23

PANEL AND WOOD RIB DETAIL1. 24mm PLYWOOD RIB2. 3mm PVC PLASTIC COMPONENT3. 5mm METAL BOLT

12

A B

A

1

2

FINAL COMPONENT DESIGN

EXPLODED AXONOMETRIC SCALE 1:50

1. CONCRETE FOOTING JOINING PANELS AND EXISTING SCHOOL BUILDING 2. 10mm L-PLATE, 5mm METAL BOLT3. VACUUM FORMED COMPONENT PANEL4. 5mm METAL BOLT5. 2 INTERLOCKED 12mm PLYWOOD RIBS6. CONCRETE FOOTING TO GROUND

FABRICATION AND ASSEMBLY

ONE. THE MOULDS | SUBTRACTIVE RAPID PROTOTYPING

TWO. THE COMPONENT PANELS | VACUUM FORMING WITH MOULDS

THREE. ASSEMBLY OF COMPONENT PANELS

FOUR. ASSEMBLY OF PANELS WITH WOOD RIB

FINAL COMPONENT DESIGN

12

3

5

4

6 1

ELEVATIONSCALE 1:50

SECTIONSCALE 1:50

EXPLODED AXONOMETRIC SCALE 1:50

1. CONCRETE FOOTING JOINING PANELS AND EXISTING SCHOOL BUILDING 2. 10mm L-PLATE, 5mm METAL BOLT3. VACUUM FORMED COMPONENT PANEL4. 5mm METAL BOLT5. 2 INTERLOCKED 12mm PLYWOOD RIBS6. CONCRETE FOOTING TO GROUND

FABRICATION AND ASSEMBLY

ONE. THE MOULDS | SUBTRACTIVE RAPID PROTOTYPING

TWO. THE COMPONENT PANELS | VACUUM FORMING WITH MOULDS

THREE. ASSEMBLY OF COMPONENT PANELS

FOUR. ASSEMBLY OF PANELS WITH WOOD RIB

FINAL COMPONENT DESIGN

12

3

5

4

6 1

PANEL GUTTER ASSEMBLY DETAIL1. ALIGN PANEL A AGAINST PANEL B WITH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B DOWN

2. FOLD GUTTER FLAP OF PANEL B UP TO CLASP THE SIDE OF PANEL A

3. BOLT THROUGH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B, THE SIDE OF A, THEN THE SIDE OF PANEL B.

INTERIOR RENDERS

1

23

PANEL AND WOOD RIB DETAIL1. 24mm PLYWOOD RIB2. 3mm PVC PLASTIC COMPONENT3. 5mm METAL BOLT

12

A B

A

B1

2

FINAL COMPONENT DESIGN

SITE PLANSCALE 1:300

FLOOR PLANSCALE 1:100

ROOF PLANSCALE 1:50

PANEL GUTTER ASSEMBLY DETAIL1. ALIGN PANEL A AGAINST PANEL B WITH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B DOWN

2. FOLD GUTTER FLAP OF PANEL B UP TO CLASP THE SIDE OF PANEL A

3. BOLT THROUGH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B, THE SIDE OF A, THEN THE SIDE OF PANEL B.

INTERIOR RENDERS

1

23

PANEL AND WOOD RIB DETAIL1. 24mm PLYWOOD RIB2. 3mm PVC PLASTIC COMPONENT3. 5mm METAL BOLT

12

A B

A

1

2

FINAL COMPONENT DESIGN

EXPLODED AXONOMETRIC SCALE 1:50

1. CONCRETE FOOTING JOINING PANELS AND EXISTING SCHOOL BUILDING 2. 10mm L-PLATE, 5mm METAL BOLT3. VACUUM FORMED COMPONENT PANEL4. 5mm METAL BOLT5. 2 INTERLOCKED 12mm PLYWOOD RIBS6. CONCRETE FOOTING TO GROUND

FABRICATION AND ASSEMBLY

ONE. THE MOULDS | SUBTRACTIVE RAPID PROTOTYPING

TWO. THE COMPONENT PANELS | VACUUM FORMING WITH MOULDS

THREE. ASSEMBLY OF COMPONENT PANELS

FOUR. ASSEMBLY OF PANELS WITH WOOD RIB

FINAL COMPONENT DESIGN

12

3

5

4

6 1

ELEVATIONSCALE 1:50

SECTIONSCALE 1:50

EXPLODED AXONOMETRIC SCALE 1:50

1. CONCRETE FOOTING JOINING PANELS AND EXISTING SCHOOL BUILDING 2. 10mm L-PLATE, 5mm METAL BOLT3. VACUUM FORMED COMPONENT PANEL4. 5mm METAL BOLT5. 2 INTERLOCKED 12mm PLYWOOD RIBS6. CONCRETE FOOTING TO GROUND

FABRICATION AND ASSEMBLY

ONE. THE MOULDS | SUBTRACTIVE RAPID PROTOTYPING

TWO. THE COMPONENT PANELS | VACUUM FORMING WITH MOULDS

THREE. ASSEMBLY OF COMPONENT PANELS

FOUR. ASSEMBLY OF PANELS WITH WOOD RIB

FINAL COMPONENT DESIGN

12

3

5

4

6 1

PANEL GUTTER ASSEMBLY DETAIL1. ALIGN PANEL A AGAINST PANEL B WITH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B DOWN

2. FOLD GUTTER FLAP OF PANEL B UP TO CLASP THE SIDE OF PANEL A

3. BOLT THROUGH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B, THE SIDE OF A, THEN THE SIDE OF PANEL B.

INTERIOR RENDERS

1

23

PANEL AND WOOD RIB DETAIL1. 24mm PLYWOOD RIB2. 3mm PVC PLASTIC COMPONENT3. 5mm METAL BOLT

12

A B

A

B1

2

FINAL COMPONENT DESIGN

SITE PLANSCALE 1:300

FLOOR PLANSCALE 1:100

ROOF PLANSCALE 1:50

PANEL GUTTER ASSEMBLY DETAIL1. ALIGN PANEL A AGAINST PANEL B WITH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B DOWN

2. FOLD GUTTER FLAP OF PANEL B UP TO CLASP THE SIDE OF PANEL A

3. BOLT THROUGH THE GUTTER FLAP OF B, THE SIDE OF A, THEN THE SIDE OF PANEL B.

INTERIOR RENDERS

1

23

PANEL AND WOOD RIB DETAIL1. 24mm PLYWOOD RIB2. 3mm PVC PLASTIC COMPONENT3. 5mm METAL BOLT

12

A B

A

1

2

FINAL COMPONENT DESIGN

Page 16: LYNETTE LIM'S PORTFOLIO

A Yoga Retreat Centre

Located metres away from the busy Newton Circle traffic roundabout, this retreat requires a quiet atmosphere in order facilitate the activities of a yoga retreat. The main strategy of sinking the building into the ground led to the creation of tunnel-like corridors for the private stay-in areas, and spaces which would open to the canopy of trees which grew at ground level, which are existing on-site.

Year 3 Semester I (AY2009/10) A group effort with Tan Jack Young and Edmond Khoo.Under supervision of Kazuhiro Nakajima.

Page 17: LYNETTE LIM'S PORTFOLIO
Page 18: LYNETTE LIM'S PORTFOLIO
Page 19: LYNETTE LIM'S PORTFOLIO
Page 20: LYNETTE LIM'S PORTFOLIO

Back to the Water

This backpackers’ hostel is located in the heart old town Malacca, the surroundings a quiet shophouse neighbourhood, accompanied by the river right behind it. Back to the Water was conceived as a work-stay hostel, where the occupants would learn and serve the rattan store owner who lived next to the plot, in order to earn their stay. The concept of this project was to bring the occupants closer to the water, like the way living by the river meant, for residents had long lost their intimacy with water with the new concrete boardwalk the government had built.

Year 3 Semester I (AY2009/10) Under supervision of Davisi Boontham.

Page 21: LYNETTE LIM'S PORTFOLIO
Page 22: LYNETTE LIM'S PORTFOLIO
Page 23: LYNETTE LIM'S PORTFOLIO
Page 24: LYNETTE LIM'S PORTFOLIO
Page 25: LYNETTE LIM'S PORTFOLIO

End.