LUSAS Linear and Nonlinear Buckling Analysis

3
Selected Applications Curved girder analysis Linear and nonlinear buckling Integral abutment bridges Staged construction analysis Concrete modelling Post-tensioning Eurocode Pedestrian Loading Linear and Nonlinear Buckling Analysis Geometric, material, and boundary nonlinearity Erection analysis Mesh sensitivity analysis Buckling analysis of structures to codified requirements is often over- conservative. For existing structures, assessment or load rating to regional design codes often shows they ‘fail’ buckling checks, but detailed buckling analysis with LUSAS can often reveal additional ‘hidden’ capacity. For new plate girder, box or tub girder bridge designs, linear and nonlinear buckling analysis using LUSAS can investigate the girder stability during erection, look at the effects of a slab casting sequence, and also help to optimise the size of the web and flange plates, bracing, stiffeners and position of any temporary supports used Linear buckling To obtain an indication of a structure’s potential to buckle under a particular loading a linear buckling analysis can be undertaken. Linear buckling analysis can estimate the maximum load that can be supported prior to structural instability or collapse. A LUSAS analysis therefore provides load factors based on classic elastic buckling. Where the type of structure isn’t covered by the design code, and where P-delta, lift-off and yielding effects are not significant in the loading range up to buckling, a linear buckling analysis should give a more accurate assessment of member resistance than would be obtained from a code of practice. However, imperfections and nonlinearities tend to prevent most ‘real’ structures from achieving their theoretical elastic (or "Euler") buckling strength, so the eigenvalue buckling load factors are therefore somewhat overestimated. To get a more accurate answer nonlinear analysis can be undertaken. Nonlinear buckling For a detailed structural buckling assessment a geometrically nonlinear analyses should be carried out. With this, material and boundary nonlinearity can also be investigated if found to be required. With a geometrically nonlinear analysis the stiffness matrix of the structure is automatically updated between loading increments to incorporate deformations which affect the structural behaviour (sometimes described by engineers as P-delta effects). Nonlinear buckling can be performed on the original structure without imperfection, or by automatically adding an imperfection based upon a scaled deformed shape which could be from a linear buckling model.

description

LUSAS Linear and Nonlinear Buckling Analysis

Transcript of LUSAS Linear and Nonlinear Buckling Analysis

Page 1: LUSAS Linear and Nonlinear Buckling Analysis

Selected Applications

Curved girder analysis Linear and nonlinear buckling Integral abutment bridges

Staged construction analysis Concrete modelling Post-tensioning

Eurocode Pedestrian Loading

Linear and Nonlinear Buckling

Analysis

Geometric, material, and boundary nonlinearity

Erection analysis

Mesh sensitivity analysis

Buckling analysis of structures to codified requirements is often over-conservative. For existing structures, assessment or load rating toregional design codes often shows they ‘fail’ buckling checks, butdetailed buckling analysis with LUSAS can often reveal additional‘hidden’ capacity.

For new plate girder, box or tub girder bridge designs, linear andnonlinear buckling analysis using LUSAS can investigate the girderstability during erection, look at the effects of a slab castingsequence, and also help to optimise the size of the web and flangeplates, bracing, stiffeners and position of any temporary supportsused

Linear buckling

To obtain an indication of a structure’s potential to buckle under a particular loading a linearbuckling analysis can be undertaken. Linear buckling analysis can estimate the maximumload that can be supported prior to structural instability or collapse. A LUSAS analysistherefore provides load factors based on classic elastic buckling. Where the type of structureisn’t covered by the design code, and where P-delta, lift-off and yielding effects are notsignificant in the loading range up to buckling, a linear buckling analysis should give a moreaccurate assessment of member resistance than would be obtained from a code of practice.However, imperfections and nonlinearities tend to prevent most ‘real’ structures from achievingtheir theoretical elastic (or "Euler") buckling strength, so the eigenvalue buckling load factorsare therefore somewhat overestimated. To get a more accurate answer nonlinear analysis canbe undertaken.

Nonlinear buckling

For a detailed structural buckling assessment a geometrically

nonlinear analyses should be carried out. With this, material andboundary nonlinearity can also be investigated if found to berequired. With a geometrically nonlinear analysis the stiffness matrixof the structure is automatically updated between loadingincrements to incorporate deformations which affect the structuralbehaviour (sometimes described by engineers as P-delta effects).

Nonlinear buckling can be performed on the original structure withoutimperfection, or by automatically adding an imperfection based upona scaled deformed shape which could be from a linear bucklingmodel.

Page 2: LUSAS Linear and Nonlinear Buckling Analysis

A structure may also experience some material nonlinearity during a buckling event (yielding for example) and/or some boundarynonlinearity (lift-off supports, perhaps). Generally it is recommended that modelling of nonlinear effects is done progressively in order toevaluate the results of each additional modelling at each stage. This helps in developing an understanding of the structural behaviour andhelps to identify the cause of any potential failed analyses.

Erection analysis

A nonlinear buckling analysis with LUSAS can investigate thestability of girders under self-weight loading, imposed constructionloads such as slab pours, and wind loads. From the resultsobtained, members can be re-sized accordingly and, if necessary,temporary bracing and supports can be inserted into the model andtested to reduce the structural response.

For some clients, buckling analysis erection checks with LUSAShave highlighted that for some open box girder designs with narrowbottom flanges a standard design approach is just not valid.

Mesh sensitivity analysis

With finite element analysis, it is good practice to carry out a mesh sensitivity check to ensure that results are not unconservative. Meshdensity should be checked to ensure enough elements of the type chosen are being used. Coarse mesh patterns could produce underconservative results; fine mesh patterns may take longer to solve and be no more accurate. Similarly quadratic elements will generallyproduce better results than linear elements with nonlinear capabilities. Unlike some software systems, with LUSAS, mesh patterns canbe easily refined and manipulated without losing any assigned supports and loading - making it ideal for this type of work.

As an example the plate girder shown was meshed with 0.2m mesh divisions and then had 0.1m mesh divisions assigned for a meshrefinement check. The results showed that the change of displacement and the difference in maximum stress differed by less than 1% -meaning that, for this model at least, the initial mesh definition was sufficiently fine enough to achieve good results.

Page 3: LUSAS Linear and Nonlinear Buckling Analysis

Nonlinear buckling analysis procedure with LUSAS

1. Carry-out an initial linear analysis and check the stress levels

for factored loading.

2. Perform a mesh sensitivity analysis

3. Run a linear eigenvalue buckling analysis to give load factor

at which the critical buckling may occur.

4. Save the model and define an initial imperfection (if

necessary)

5. Add nonlinear controls

6. Run an initial geometric nonlinear buckling analysis

7. Add additional nonlinear material or boundary conditions as

necessary.

Buckling analysis summary

Linear buckling analysis enables an assessment of the buckling resistance of a structure, and may be particularly useful for

structures not falling within the scope of codes of practice.

In some instances, a linear buckling analysis may appropriate to satisfy checks against buckling, in others, it may only provide a

good starting point for a thorough nonlinear buckling analysis.

Nonlinear buckling analysis provides a detailed buckling assessment and can include geometric, material and boundary effects.

LUSAS provides all the facilities required for linear or nonlinear buckling analysis, and has the ability to consider nonlinear buckling

effects throughout a staged erection analysis.

Back to Top

Any modelling and analysis capabilities described on this page are dependent upon the LUSAS software product and version in use.

home | software | options | case studies | support | consultancy | academics | news | contact us | jobs | search

LUSAS is a trademark and trading name of Finite Element Analysis Ltd.Copyright © 1982-2010 Last modified: August 16, 2010.