LRD Condition Assessment

One Team: Relevant~ Ready~ Responsive~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ US Army Corps of Engineerso

ASSET MANAGEMENT is the business and decision-making process for the operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation and replacement or disposal of assets that allows manager to maximize the asset productivity and manage

the related risks and costs.

One Team: Relevant~ Ready~ Responsive~

_ _ ________a_n_e_Jj_ea_m_:_R_e_le_v._a_n_t!I_R_e_a_d_~_!l_R_e_sp_o_n_s_i_ve_!I_R_e_ll_a_b_le

Background- Provide Management Tools to Evaluate System Health

I_ : - • •

OHIO

Risk Single lock out of service Impact Regional loss of $1

Estimated Cost to Repair $50 0K

Facility Condition

Assessment

Standard • Assessment

Methodology • Assessment

Team • Rating Scale • Cost Effective

Reliability Centered

Maintenance (Preventative)

Risk & Consequence Assessment

Mission Safety Security Regulatory

Consequences Unscheduled

Loss of Service Property Damage/Loss Other

Regional Economic

Considerations (Impacts)

Loss of Service = $ Impacts or $ Benefit Loss

Prioritization

Programming and Budgeting

Process FY10

One Team: Relevant~ Ready~ Responsive~ Reliable ~~--------~--~--~

Asset Management- Performance Reliability Assessment Standards for Navigation Projects

Condition Definitions

- There is a high level of confidence that the feature will perform well under the designed operating conditions. This confidence level is supported by data, studies or observed project characteristics which are judged to meet current engineering or industry standards. - There is a limited probability that the verified degraded conditions will cause an inefficient operation, or degradation or lose of service.

- There is a low level of confidence that the feature will perform well under designed operating conditions, and may not specifically meet engineering or industry standards . The feature may require additional investigation or studies to confirm

Probably - There is a low probability that the verified degraded conditions will result in inefficient operation, or degradation or Adequate loss of service.

- There is a low level of confidence that the feature will not perform well under designed operating conditions, and c may not specifically meet engineering or industry standards. The feature may require additional investigation or studies to Probably confirm adequacy. The feature does not meet current engineering or industry standards.

- There is a moderate probability that the verified degraded conditions will result in inefficient operation, or Inadequate or loss of service

- There is a high level of confidence that the feature will not perform well under designed operating conditions. Physical signs of distress and deterioration are present . Analysis indicates that factors of safety are near limit state. The D feature deficiencies are serious enough that the feature no longer performs at a satisfactory level of performance or service .

Inadequate - There is a low probability that the verified degraded conditions will result in inefficient operation, or degradation or loss of service.

-The feature has FAILED - Historically the feature regularly experiences scheduled or unscheduled closures or loss of service for repairs .

One Team: Relevant~ Ready~ Responsive~ Reliable


USArmy Corpsof Engmeers•

-- -

ll!l ACOE Data Collectoon

Edit Help

Navigation IFlood Damage Aeduction )

Project Selection

District j LAP-Pittsbuogh

EJ Allegheny B· L/D 2 (LAP) ' EJ Lock Structure$

!· Lock Buildings !· ·Lock Walls !· Me>oring Cells L.. Miscelaneous

'· M~er Gate !r Operating Machinery '· Filling/EmptyingV~Ives ~nd Oper~ting

· D~m Structures , : ... Dam Gates and Operating Machinery!- Bill Youn11 LID (LAP) i- LID 4 [LAP)! ·LID 5 [LAP)

· LID 6 [LAP) Custom Comment

·· L/D 7 (LAP) fl st~ndardComment.------------------ ___, Custom comments ~n be entered toy the evai~U~tor here. ; · L/D 8 [LAP) II Select Comment jSelect predefined comment... :::J

!... LID 9 (LAP) ~- Clinch Predefined comments can be selected here. These aoe populated loom ~ : .. Cumoorland the DASH ·1 0 document.

•·..·Green

I Images

I View Al l mages

. Add lmageI Oear Form Complete Ev~luation

One Team: Relevant~ Ready~ Responsive~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ US Army Corps of Engineers•

. \

.. : .

i'. '

""'~· ~ ·

..

",... .' .•. '•.

...

. . . . .

. . "":.

... '• •• · 7

..

\'

. "

·'

. ~ .

.... •••• :-. f

:,.

·.

.I ' .

..

"· • ..

"' .,

, .. ::•.,I :., , •:•, )•r.y, :' .. ., .

'·· t . .. :·:, . '~z .,·

--. :. 1... · r~.. '. t ·. . • . lP.. ..,• ., .,J' : ... \, ,.. . .. -~ .....t • •, f""'..,;,J,;;.. ~00<.. Alp> 0,;. ··';: ":·: I •.. .. . . . ,. ; ~i ' ,.:; ,;> ..

. . .. , ·" rC . ;:>· : ..-c~ ...... ./5 . ' .~ '. ,'

~ . . . '

Project Details

District: LRL- Louisville Waterway.

Division: Great Lakes and Ohio River Division Project:

Project Risk ISystem Risk I Component Risk I Cost I

Mission Critical Risk

$0.0

Safety Risk

Security Risk

Compliance Risk

Failure Impact Cost

Ohio

Markland Lock Dam

District: LRL - Louisville Waterway. Ohio

Division: Great Lakes and Ohio R iver Division Project: Markland Lock Dam

Project Risk JSystem Risk I Component Risk I Cost I


,. Safety Risk Cost

Show System Components

Lock Structures Conditions

Filling/Emptying System

Dam Gates &Operating Ma... 2.53

Dam Strcutres Conditions (Fi...

Miscellaneous Support Syst...

lProject Detail•

District: LRL- Louisville W e.te rwl!ly. Ohio

Divis io n: Greet Lakes e.nd Ohio Rive r Divisi on P ro j ect: Marklan d Lo ck Oe.m

Project Risk J System Risk I Component Ri•k I Cost I


Project Risk System Risk

Mission Safety System Criticality Criticality

Average Average

Lock and Dam Maintenanc .. I I I

Security Compliance Show SystemCriticality Criticality ComponentsAverage Average

Component Security Criticality

Compliance Criticality

Bulkhead

Gate Structures: Primary Lock · US Gates

Gate Structures: Primary Lock· DS Gates

2.50

Bulkhead Crane

Cross-overs in Lock Chamber: Primary Lock

Gate Anchorage: Primary Lock· DS Gates

Gate Anchorage: Primary Lock· US Gates

. I

Navigation (Prioritized by Impact Costs then Overall Condition/Risk Indicators)

Project Components at Risk

McAlpine Dam & Miter Gates

UD53 Lock Walls (Missing Section), Miter Gate, Valves

Bear Traps, Miter Gates. Lock Walls, Access

Greenup Miter Gates, Dam/Lock Bulkheads, Crane

Markland Miter Gates, Valves, Bulkhead Crane

Dam Gates & Connections, Sill Damage

Dam Gates, Bulkheads & Structure

Poe Lock Gates, Mac Lock Machinery & Maint. Bulkheads

Lock Wall Deterioration, Dam Gate Cables/Chains

Dam Gates, Valve Machinery, Bulkhead Lifting Beam

Lock Wall Movement

Stilling Basins, Dam Gate Cables/Conn, Switch Gear

One Team: Relevant~ Ready~ Responsive~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ US Army Corps of Engineers•

LRD Condition Assessment

Documents

Transcript of LRD Condition Assessment