Low-pressure excess flow natural gas valves, Uniform ... · 2.2 Spitzglass Formula The design of...
Transcript of Low-pressure excess flow natural gas valves, Uniform ... · 2.2 Spitzglass Formula The design of...
LOW-PRESSURE EXCESS FLOW NATURALGAS VALVES
UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE APPLICATIONREQUIREMENTS
Prepared For:
Carl StrandStrand Earthquake Consultants
1436 S. Bentley Avenue, #6Los Angeles, CA 90025
and
James C. McGillSmart Safety Systems
4312 Lisa DriveUnion City, CA 94587
Prepared By:
J. Marx Ayres, P.E.Consulting Mechanical Engineer
1180 South Beverly Drive, Suite 600Los Angeles, California 90035
(310) 553-5285
January 21, 2002
Low-Pressure EFVs
Section
Table Of Contents
Table of Contents
Page
Table of Contents i
Tables & Figures (see attached) iiE t· S "'f'xecu Ive ummary 111 IVAcknowledgements V
1 Introduction 1-1
1.1 Background1.2 Purpose1.3 Excess Flow Valves
2 Calculations 2-12.1 UPC Requirements2.2 Spitzglass Formula2.3 Pipe System2.4 Certifications2.5 Spread Sheet Calculations
3 Discussion 3-1
4 Conclusions & Recommendations 4-1
Appendices A & B
J. Marx Ayres, P.E. Page i
Low-Pressure EFVs
Tables
Tables & Figures
Table of Contents
Page
2 - 1 Low-Pressure EFVs 2 - 42 - 2 UMAC Quake Breaker At Meter 2 - 92 - 3 UMAC Quake Breaker At Meter & At Each Appliance 2 - 112 - 4 Sanders At Meter 2 - 132 - 5 Sanders At Meter And At Each Appliance 2 - 152 - 6 UMAC Quake Breaker At Meter & Magne-Flo At Each Appliance ..2 - 172 - 7 Sanders At Meter & Magne-Flo At Each Appliance 2 - 192 - 8 Pressure-Drop Calculations Without EFVs 2 - 21
Figures
2 - 1 Model of Residential Piping System 2 - 52 - 2 Isometric Piping Diagram of EFV At Meter 2 - 62 - 3 Isometric Piping Diagram of EFV At Meter & At Each Appliance 2 - 72 - 4 Isometric Piping Diagram Without EFV 2 - 82 - 5 UMAC Quake Breaker At Meter 2 -102 - 6 UMAC Quake Breaker At Meter & At Each Appliance 2 - 122 - 7 Sanders At Meter 2 - 142 - 8 Sanders At Meter & At Each Appliance 2 - 162 - 9 UMAC Quake Breaker At Meter & Magne-Flo At Each Appliance 2 -182 - 10 Sanders At Meter & Magne-Flo At Each Appliance 2 - 202 - 11 Pressure-Drop Calculations Without EFVs 2 - 22
J. Marx Ayres, P.E. Page ii
Low-Pressure EFVs
Executive Summary
Executive Summary
The performance of low-pressure gas systems in buildings during earthquakes, and the
potential for fire due to pipe breaks or leaks, are vital public life/safety issues. Manufactured
products designed to shut-off or limit the supply of gas during an earthquake have been
developed and installed. Earthquake-actuated seismic gas shut-off valves (SGSVs), which are
generally installed downstream from the gas utility meters, have been mandated by some
Building Codes. Excess flow valves (EFVs), which are designed to limit the flow of gas when
the pressure-drop across the valves exceeds their manufacturer's specified limit, have been
developed for installation downstream from the meter or at each flexible appliance connector.
The installation and operation of gas systems on customers' premises is regulated by the
National Fuel Gas Code and local Building Codes. The Uniform Plumbing Code (UPC) requires
that each low-pressure gas system be so designed that the total pressure drop between the
meter (or other point of supply) and any outlet, when full demand is being supplied to all outlets,
will at no time exceed 0.5" of water column (WC) pressure. For low-pressure (6" to 8" WC)
systems with 250 CFH maximum demand and 250 Ft. maximum length from the meter (or other
point of supply) to the most distant outlet, pipe sizing tables are provided. The UPC also
provides for pressure-drop calculations on each pipe section, fitting, valve, or control device,
following basic fluid flow engineering formulas to meet the 0.5" maximum total pressure-drop
criteria.
The pressure drops required to actuate (Le., close) EFVs are determined by certified testing
laboratories following the CSA U.S. No. 3-92 Requirements. The purpose of this study was to
determine the impact of these valves when applied in a model residential building with 7.0" WC
pressure gas service. Plan check calculations were prepared for the gas system with and
without EFVs (manufactured by UMAC, Sanders, & Brass Craft / Magne-Flo) located: (1)
downstream of the meter, and (2) at the meter and at each appliance connector. Spitzglass
formula pressure-drop calculations for all components in the system were prepared, and the
results of the spread sheet calculations are presented in tabular and graphical form. Difficulties
in obtaining EFV and appliance - connector pressure - drop data are discussed.
J. Marx Ayres, P.E. Page iii
Low-Pressure EFVs
The study's conclusions and recommendations are:
Executive Summary
• When EFVs are installed in typically sized low-pressure gas systems, the total pressure drop
of the systems will exceed the UPC maximum allowed 0.5" WC.
• Building Codes should require plan checks for any low-pressure gas systems using one or
more EFVs.
• Pressure drops across flexible appliance connectors should be listed with a defined number
and radii of bends or loops.
• For flexible appliance connectors that are provided with an attached or encapsulated EFV,
the pressure drops should be listed both with and without the EFV.
J. Marx Ayres, P.E. Pageiv
Low-Pressure EFVs
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements
This report was prepared by J. Marx Ayres, P.E., Past President of Ayres, Ezer & Varadi,
Consulting Engineers, now renamed AEV Inc. Technical assistance was provided by Ivan
Varadi, C.I.P.E., Vice President and Director of Plumbing & Fire Protection Engineering at AEV.
The assistance of Carl Strand, President of Strand Earthquake Consultants, in providing
background information, product brochures, and test reports obtained from State agencies is
gratefully acknowledged.
J. Marx Ayres, P.E. Page v
Low-Pressure EFVs
1.1 Background
Section 1Introduction
Introduction
The performance inside buildings of gas systems during earthquakes and the potentialfor fire due to failure of one or more system components (pipe segments, fittings, valves,flexible appliance connectors, or appliances), has been the subject of intense study bygovernment agencies, utilities, researchers, and design engineers. Manufacturedproducts designed to shut-off or limit the supply of gas during an earthquake have beendeveloped and installed.
Seismic gas shut-off valves (SGSVs), which close when they detect a certain level ofground or pipe shaking, are generally installed downstream from gas-utility meters in low- pressure lines serving buildings. Excess flow valves (EFVs) are designed to restrict theflow of gas when they detect a sufficiently large drop in pressure on the downstreamside of the valve, which may occur due to a downstream pipe failure. EFVs, normallyused in gas-utility high-pressure lines upstream from the meter, have been developed forapplication downstream from the meter (like the SGSVs) and also at each applianceconnection.
Building Codes & Standards, which are designed to regulate an industry and protect thepublic, are revised and upgraded after each major earthquake. Most of the Standardsdeveloped by professional organizations follow strict consensus procedures that definemanufacturing performance and testing requirements. Building Codes define theminimum standards and construction procedures allowed by the governmental agencyhaving jurisdiction. Organizations that develop and publish Standards, Codes, andCertifications that are of interest in this study include:
• American Gas Association (AGA)• American National Standards Institute (ANSI)
• American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
• American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning Engineers(ASHRAE)
• American Society of Plumbing Engineers (ASPE)• California Division of the State Architect (DSA)• Canadian Gas Association (CGA)• Canadian Standard Association (CSA)• International Approval Services (IAS)
• International Association of Plumbing & Mechanical Officials (IAPMO)• National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
On July 3, 1997, the CSA, an independent North American Standards-development,product-certification, and management-systems-regulation organization, acquired IAS(formerly a joint venture of AGA and CGA).
The professional organizations that develop Standards operate through Technical orTask Committees (TC's) where members are appointed to represent most of the
J. Marx Ayres, P.E. Page 1 -1
Low-Pressure EFVs Introduction
interested parties in a specific industry, (Le., manufacturers, application designengineers, users, installers, and governmental agencies). The industry discussionsregarding SGSVs and EFVs are currently focused in the ASCE-25 Task Committee onEarthquake Safety Issues for Gas Systems. The ASCE-25 TC is an ad hoc committeeconsisting of ASCE-25 members and others, and was formed by the California SeismicSafety Commission (SSC) to study the use of seismic gas safety valves as well asproducts and methods related to earthquake safety.
1.2 The purpose of this study was to assist in the evaluation of EFV applications in buildinglow-pressure natural gas systems. The specific assignment was to prepare plan-checkcalculations for a typical residential installation using the test results submitted by themanufacturers to the California Office of the State Fire Marshal and the DSA. Thetechnical approach was to select a model building and prepare pipe-sizing calculationsfor the gas system both with and without EFVs. The residential system shown on page105 of the 1979 edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code (UPC) was selected as the model.
The pressure-drop calculations presented in this study are limited to natural gas systemswith specific gravity of 0.6 at 60°F. See Section 2.0. The component and systempressure drops using natural gas at other specific gravities, and / or vaporous propanegas with specific gravity of 1.53 at 60°F., were not a part of this study.
1.3 Low-Pressure EFVs
Low-pressure (LP) EFVs are designed for installation downstream of the gas-utilitypressure regulator and meter, or at the end of the gas line after the gas cock at the entryto the flexible appliance connector. They are constructed with a mechanical means thatis intended to prevent gas flow in excess of 80% to 110% of their manufacturer'sspecified closing flow rate at the system's normal operating pressure. Themanufacturers of LPEFVs included in this study are UMAC (Quake Breaker, GasBreaker, & GASP brands), Sanders Valve, and Brass Craft (Magne-Flo brand).
J. Marx Ayres, P.E. Page 1 - 2
Low-Pressure EFVs
2.1 UPC Requirements
Section 2Calculations
Calculations
The requirements for gas pressure regulators and piping size are based on a natural gashaving a specific gravity (SG) of. 0.60 at standard conditions (60°F and 14.7 Psi)supplied at 6" to 8" WC pressure at the outlet of the meter (UPC Section 1216.0). Themaximum demand shall not exceed 250 cubic feet per hour (CFH), and the maximumlength of piping between the meter and the most distant outlet shall not exceed 250 feet.The size of each section of pipe and each outlet of any system shall be determined bymeans of UPC Table 12-3 (Section 1217.1).
UPC Table 12-3 is based on the maximum delivery capacity in CFH of iron pipe size(IPS) carrying natural gas with a maximum pressure drop of 0.5" WC pressure. Thistable-simplified "longest run" method was developed by NFPA and AGA (National FuelGas Code NFPA 54; ANSI Z 223.1). For conditions other than those covered in UPCSection 1217.1, the size of each piping system shall be determined by standardengineering methods acceptable to the Administrative Authority. Each such systemshall be so designed that the total pressure drop between the meter (or other point ofsupply) and any outlet, when full demand is being supplied to all outlets, will at no timeexceed 0.5" WC pressure. This type of calculation is often referred to as the "pressuredrop" method.
2.2 Spitzglass Formula
The design of piping systems for gas is a fluid-flow problem. Where the required flowrate is determined, the pressure losses due to friction are calculated, and the requiredresidual pressure at each appliance is known. Using basic engineering formulae, theengineer can tabulate the various quantities, establish the pipe sizes for each section ofpiping, and determine the pressure and flow rate at any point in the system. The flowrate of gas (at standard conditions) in a pipe with pressures not exceeding 1 Psi (28"WC) can be computed using the following Spitzglass formula (ASPE Data Book, 1999,Page 8, Equation 1-24):
Q = 3550 K I hSL
Q - 3550 K (.ll-\Yz- SU
[ d5h ] ~
Q = 3550
SL (1 + 3;t + O.03d)Where
Q =Gas flow rate (In CFH)d
=Inside pipe diameter (In Inches)h
=Pressure drop (In Inches WC)S
=Specific gravity of the gasL
=Length of pipe (In Feet)
J. Marx Ayres, P.E. Page 2 -1
Low-Pressure EFVs Calculations
The length used in the formula must be corrected to allow for the additional resistance toflow caused by valves and fittings in the piping. The pressure drops expressed in"equivalent lengths" of pipe for standard pipe fittings are available in the UPC and otherpiping design handbooks. Pressure drops through control valves and other devicesinserted into the system should be obtained from their manufacturer's published data,because flow patterns through valves can vary significantly.
2.3 Pipe System
The model piping system with connected appliances and pipe sized by the "longest run"method per UPC Table 12-3 is shown in Figure 2-1. The typical residential customerreceives gas from the serving utility at 6" - 8" WC pressure. In California, the SouthernCalifornia Gas Company (SCG) provides gas at 8" WC pressure to their residentialcustomers and Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) provides gas at 7" WC pressure. Forpurposes of this study, the pressure-reducing valve (regulator) was set at 7-1/2" WCpressure and 0.5" WC pressure drop was assumed through a typical meter. Thus thepressure entering the piping system is 7" WC. The piping is terminated at eachappliance with a shut-off cock and a flexible metal connector. Isometric drawings of thepiping system with EFVs are shown in Figures 2-2 and 2-4.
The UPC limits the piping system's total pressure drop from the meter to the outlet to amaximum of 0.5" WC. The outlet is not clearly defined in the Code, but it is interpretedto mean the shut-off cock at the end of the piping system. If an EFV is inserted into thepiping system at the appliance, it would be located upstream from the shut-off cock. Ifthe EFV is located downstream from the shut-off cock, its pressure drop must beincluded in the 0.5" WC maximum total pressure loss. Note that in the followingisometric piping diagrams, the EFV is located downstream from the shut-off cock as apractical matter to facilitate maintenance or replacement.
2.4 Certifications
The design, construction, and performance of all gas-system components (appliances,flexible connectors, SGSVs, EFVs, and other devices) must be tested following apublished standard and certified (listed) by a recognized agency. In the U.S. gasindustry, the criteria is established in the National Fuel Gas Code, (ANSI Z 223.1/NFPA54) and other ANSI.CGA standards. The manufactured products are tested by approvedlaboratories (such as AGA) to assure that they meet that criteria. The currently acceptedcriteria for EFVs are published in the CSA U.S. No. 3-92 Requirements. It should benoted that the Requirements were developed by the CSA non-consensus "industrystandard" development function and not their "consensus standard" developmentfunction.
The performance of listed appliance connections for low-pressure (8" WC or less)systems based on 0.2" WC pressure drop for various lengths and flow rates, arepresented in UPC Table 12-10. The appliance connectors offered by one manufacturer(Brass Craft) are tested and listed per ANSI Z 21.24./ CGA 6.10 for pressures that donot exceed 0.5 psi (14" WC) and are based on 0.5" WC pressure drop for variousstraight lengths and flow rates (expressed in BTU/HR with 0.64-SG, 1000-BTU/CF gas).See Appendix A.
J. Marx Ayres, P.E. Page 2 - 2
Low-Pressure EFVs Calculations
The performance data and description of the LPEFVs included in this study arepresented in Table 2-1. See Appendix B for the available manufacturer's literature andCSA-certification test data. Note that the UMAC test data are based on 0.6-SG with
1000-BTU/CF gas; and the Sanders and Magne-Flo test data are based on 0.64-SG1000-BTU/CF gas. The calculations shown in Section 2.5 used the CSA's 0.64-SGbased pressure drop (h) without correction to 0.6 SG, which would have an insignificantimpact on the calculated pressure drops. Calculations were also prepared so theperformance of the various LPEFVs could be compared using the same values for SGand BTU/CF.
2.5 Spread-Sheet Calculations
The Spitzglass formula used in the Excel Spread-Sheet calculations is as follows:
Q =3550(K){(h )/(S)(L)y.5K
={D".5/(1 +(3.6/D)+(0.03)(D)]}".5
Where Q
=Gas flow rate (In CFH)D
=Inside pipe diameter (In Inches)h
=The pressure drop (In Inches WC)S
=Specific gravity of the gasL
=Length of pipe (In Feet)
The calculations were performed using the pipe sizes shown in the model depicted inFigure 2-1 with (1) an EFV only at the meter, and (2) an EFV at the meter and at eachappliance. See piping isometric diagrams shown in Figures 2-2 and 2-3. The datapoints shown on the diagrams are identified as sections in the left column of Tables 2-2through 2-8, which present the calculated pressure drops in the longest run (i.e., thepiping between the meter and the most remote outlet). Pressure drops that wereinterpolated from Table 2-1 were used for the UMAC, Sanders, and Magne-Flo EFVs.Flexible-connector pressure drops from Brass Craft for straight-length applications wereused for all flexible connectors.
Pressure drops calculated for the model system without the EFVs are presented in Table2-8. Note that the 0.49561" WC total pressure drop for the piping system without flexibleconnectors meets the UPC maximum 0.5" WC requirement. This would be expectedbecause the lines were sized per UPC Table 12-3, which was designed to help preventlow-pressure systems from exceeding 0.5" WC total pressure-drop. Also note that all ofthe systems with one or more EFVs exceed the UPC 0.5" WC maximum total pressuredrop requirement. The system pressure drops for the various configurations arepresented graphically in Figures 2-4 through 2-11.
J. Marx Ayres, P.E. Page 2 - 3
c.. s: III ~ ~ .., C
D
~/J
l
:0 m '"0 III lC (l) I\,)
01:>
0
Tab
le2
-1L
ow
-Pre
ssu
reE
FV
s
Man
ufac
ture
rB
rand
Nam
eIn
let
Max
Load
Cap
acity
Clo
sure
Flo
wD
PA
cros
sV
alve
Aut
omat
icR
equi
red
Out
let,
Inch
es
B/H
r(2
)R
ate
Ran
ge,
CF
Hat
Max
Load
,In
ches
Res
etF
orce
mou
ntin
g
UM
AC
Qua
keB
reak
er(1
)3/
4x
3/4
70,0
0080
-100
0.3-
0.6
Gra
vity
Ver
tical
"
"3/
4x
3/4
125,
000
140-
180
0.7-
0.9
""
"
"3/
4x
3/4
275,
000
290-
320
1.0-
1.4
""
"
"3/
4x
3/4
310,
000
325-
400
1.3-
1.7
""
"
"3/
4x
3/4
375,
000
400-
420
1.8-
2.3
""
"
"1
xi27
5,00
029
0-32
01.
0-1.
4"
"
"
"1
x1
310,
000
325,
400
1.3-
1.7
""
"
"1
xi37
5,00
040
0-45
01.
8-2.
3"
"
San
ders
SV
-1B
#(3)
C-1
1xi
26,0
00-
289,
000
0.5
Spr
ing
Not
Spe
cifie
d
C-6
1x
128
9,00
0-
500,
000
0.5
""
C-4
1x
150
0,00
0-
578,
000
0.5
""
C-4
1xi
578,
000
-78
9,00
00.
5"
"
Mag
ne-
Flo
(4)
Inle
t(1
/2"
or3/
4N
PT
)&
outle
t(5
/8"
or1/
2"fla
re)
70,0
001.
0M
agne
ticO
mni
Dire
ctio
nal
Not
es:
(1)
The
GA
SP
and
Gas
Bre
aker
bran
dsha
veth
esa
me
perf
orm
ance
char
acte
ristic
sas
the
Qua
keB
reak
erbr
and.
(2)
Inle
t0.
5"-
WC
min
imum
/2-P
sim
axim
um.
0.6-
SG
1000
-BT
U/C
Fga
s.
(3)
Val
veca
nbe
conf
igur
edin
6w
ays
usin
gva
rious
size
was
hers
for
ara
nge
ofm
inim
uman
dm
axim
umflo
wra
tes;
7"-
WC
syst
empr
essu
re,
0.64
-SG
1000
-BT
U/C
Fga
s;va
lves
actu
ate
with
in80
%-1
10%
ofth
ecl
osur
eflo
wra
te,
with
a5-
CF
Hby
pass
flow
.
(4)
0.5-
Psi
syst
empr
essu
re;
0.64
-SG
1000
-B/C
Fga
s;1-
CF
Hby
pass
flow
.
r o :E I '"0 .., (l)
/Jl
/Jl
s:: .., (l) m ." < /Jl () ~ o s:: III - o'
::I /Jl
c.. ~ III ~ l> '< .., C
D Y' :tJ rn
,"F
igur
e2
-1
Mod
elof
Res
iden
tial
Pip
ing
Sys
tem
FU
RN
AC
E13
6C
FH
OD C
=20
'3/
4'
30
GAL
YJA
TE
RH
EA
TE
R27
CF
HO
A H=
10'
112'
r o ~ ;, .., CD (II
(II c .., C
D m " < (II
I
A=
10'
J
l'(2
25C
FH
)
B=
20'
3/4'
(89
CF
H)
D=
10'
E=
15'
112'
1/2'
(30
CF
H)
F=
10'
-~
-:~."
'"
G=
5'1/
.2'
6B
GA
SR
EF
RIG
.3
CF
H
"'tJ III C
O CD N I CJl
GA
SM
ET
ER
l'22
5C
FH
6C
RA
NG
E"
59C
FH
o III 0" c iii'
rot- o' ::J (II
.'F
igu
re2
-2
r o ~ I"'
0 ., CD en en s:: ., C
D m "T1 < en
HEATER
Iso
met
ric
Pip
ing
Dia
gra
mE
FV
At
Met
er
METER
-E
F~
.GAS
COCK
~4
.I
enc..
:s:
III ~ » '< ., CD en "'
0 rn
Fig
ure
2-
3r o ::E -b ., C
D l/l l/l c: ., CD m " < l/l
YA
TE
RH
EA
TE
R
Iso
met
ric
Pip
ing
Dia
gra
mE
FV
At
Met
er&
At
Eac
hA
pp
lian
ce
FLE
X,
CO
NE
CT
OR
<T
YP
,)~
EF
V<
TY
P,)
GA
SC
OC
K(T
YP
,)~
t..
GA
SC
OC
K
~
I
--l
ME
TE
R
s: l:U ~ » '< ., CD l/l :u rn
(..
:s:: ~ ~ » '< ...•
CD (JI
'"tJ !'l '"tJ ~ co C
D I\J I ():)
.'F
igu
re2
-4
Iso
met
ric
Pip
ing
Dia
gra
mW
ith
ou
tE
FV
¥lATER
HEATER
r o ~ I '"tJ
...•
CD
(JI
(JI I:: ., C
D m " < (JI (') ~ (") I:: ~ :!: o ::J (JI
Low-Pressure EFVs
Table 2 - 2
Pressure-Drop Calculations WithUMAC Quake Breaker At Meter
Calculations
SECT Qd NOMINALd ACTUALLSKhRES PRESSCFH
ININFT INWCINWC1-2
22511.04910.60.533470.008476.991530863liT"
22511.0493.50.60.533470.029646.9618888822-3
22511.04910.60.533470.008476.953419745fll"
22511.04920.60.533470.016946.9364814703-4
22511.04910.60.533470.008476.928012332GAS COCK
22511.04950.60.533470.042356.885666646EFV
2251 1.15.7856666465-6
22511.04910.60.533470.008475.777197508ilL"
22511.04920.60.533470.016945.7602592346-7
22511.049100.60.533470.084695.675567860ilL"
22511.04920.60.533470.016945.6586295857-8
22511.049200.60.533470.169385.489246838"T"
22511.0490.750.60.533470.006355.4828949858-9
890.750.824100.60.265390.053555.429349677liT"
890.750.8240.50.60.265390.002685.4266724119-10
300.50.622100.60.116950.031335.395346390liT"
300.50.62220.60.116950.006275.38908118610-11
270.50.622100.60.116950.025375.363707109ilL"
270.50.62210.60.116950.002545.36116970111-12
270.50.62210.60.116950.002545.358632293GAS COCK
270.50.62240.60.116950.010155.34848266213-14
270.50.62210.60.116950.002545.345945255ilL"
270.50.62210.60.116950.002545.34340784714-15
270.50.62210.60.116950.002545.340870439FLEX CONN.
270.50.62230.6 0.54.840870439
TOT PRESS DROP
PRESS DROP EXCLUDING FLEX CONNECTOR
J. Marx Ayres, P.E.
2.15913
1.65913
Page 2 - 9
Low-Pressure EFVs Calculations
1--'U
°0->'", ~P" ~"/"
.&"
0:::
UJ~" I-UJ
-Yo.:2:
°0 !:ic? 15"~ L" 00:::
UJ"{::::s:::«UJ""0:::
<?"
m
"'<
UJ
::::s:::«0"
::l<5>
a0"'<
«:2:
6'6>
::l::I:I-
"'<§
UJ
<9,Z
<' 0"{
~...J<'~
::l0...J
"{
«0fl.I9S
00:::C
""V'v>
IUJ
0:::
-Yo.
::lUJ°0
UJ
.&, 15"~
UJ
C' 00:::
fl."{C'~'~~L
L{)
0L{)0L{)0L{)0r--:
I"-<D<0uiui.,f.,f
J. Marx Ayres, P.E. Page 2 -10
Low-Pressure EFVs
Table 2 - 3
Pressure-Drop Calculations WithUMAC Quake Breaker At Meter And At Each Appliance
Calculations
SECT Qd NOMINALd ACTUALLSKhRES PRESSCFH
ININFT INWCINWC1-2
22511.04910.60.533470.008476.991530863"T"
22511.0490.750.60.533470.006356.9851790102-3
22511.04910.60.533470.008476.976709872ilL"
22511.04920.60.533470.016946.9597715983-4
22511.04910.60.533470.008476.951302460GAS COCK
22511.04950.60.533470.042356.908956773EFV
2251 1.15.8089567735-6
22511.04910.60.533470.008475.800487636ilL"
22511.04920.60.533470.016945.7835493616-7
22511.049100.60.533470.084695.698857988ilL"
22511.04920.60.533470.016945.6819197137-8
22511.049200.60.533470.169385.512536966liT"
22511.0490.750.60.533470.006355.5061851138-9
890.750.824100.60.265390.05355·5.452639804"T"
890.750.8240.50.60.265390.002685.4499625399-10
300.50.622100.60.116950.031335.418636518liT"
300.50.62220.60.116950.006275.41237131410-11
270.50.622100.60.116950.025375.386997237ilL"
270.50.62210.60.116950.002545.38445982911-12
270.50.62210.60.116950.002545.381922421GAS COCK
270.50.62240.60.116950.010155.371772790EFV
27 0.35.07177279013-14
270.50.62210.60.116950.002545.069235383ilL"
270.50.62210.60.116950.002545.06669797514-15
270.50.62210.60.116950.002545.064160567FLEX CONN.
270.50.62230.6 0.54.564160567
TOT PRESS DROP
PRESS DROP EXCLUDING FLEX CONNECTOR
J. Marx Ayres, P.E.
2.43584
1.93584
Page 2 -11
Low-Pressure EFVs Calculations
/v.-u
°0:::cS'" +.;y
u~ /. «L' 'Y"/
UJ
'" !;;:"'"
c~" Z"1'Y.;y
«D:::
-Yo.
UJ
I-°0UJ
c? 0'6,
:2:
~" ~!;;:
"'/D:::" UJ
""~
«v" UJ
'~
D:::
aJ0"
UJ
~e «UJ'~
:Ju
Oz6'6>
u«
«::i:2:0."'<
:Jo.
:::c«<9,
I-<
§"{
r.n
z0<~
~...J
"/:J
" U...J
<9~«U
~.;y
a.0D:::-Yo.
cI°0 UJ
~ 0',)..19
D:::
:Jr.n"/r.n
"UJ
D:::
C'~
a.
'~ ~~0
L()0L()qL()0r-...:
<.ci<.ciuiL().,r.,r
J. Marx Ayres, P.E. Page 2 -12
Low-Pressure EFVs
Table 2 - 4
Pressure-Drop Calculations WithSanders At Meter
Calculations
SECT Qd NOMINALdACTUALLSKhRES PRESSCFH
ININFT INWCINWC1-2
22511.04910.60.533470.008476.991530863liT"
22511.0490.750.60.533470.006356.9851790102-3
22511.04910.60.533470.008476.976709872ilL"
22511.04920.60.533470.016946.9597715983-4
22511.04910.60.533470.008476.951302460GAS COCK
22511.04950.60.533470.042356.908956773EFV
2251 0.56.4089567735-6
22511.04910.60.533470.008476.400487636ilL"
22511.04920.60.533470.016946.3835493616-7
22511.049100.60.533470.084696.298857988ilL"
22511.04920.60.533470.016946.2819197137-8
22511.049200.60.533470.169386.112536966"T"
22511.0490.750.60.533470.006356.1061851138-9
890.750.824100.60.265390.05355.6.052639804"T"
890.750.8240.50.60.265390.002686.0499625399-10
300.50.622100.60.116950.031336.018636518liT"
300.50.62220.60.116950.006276.01237131410-11
270.50.622100.60.116950.025375.986997237ilL"
270.50.62210.60.116950.002545.98445982911-12
270.50.62210.60.116950.002545.981922421GAS COCK
270.50.62240.60.116950.010155.97177279013-14
270.50.62210.60.116950.002545.969235383ilL"
270.50.62210.60.116950.002545.96669797514-15
270.50.62210.60.116950.002545.964160567FLEX CONN.
270.50.62230.6 0.55.464160567
TOT PRESS DROP
PRESS DROP EXCLUDING FLEX CONNECTOR
J. Marx Ayres, P.E.
1.53584
1.03584
Page 2 -13
Low-Pressure EFVs Calculations
/v~°0->'L', -tY),:lSL' V",,)
"
~L'~L'
-Yo.°0
0::
c? ~p.,
WI-EL' 1.9
W
,,)
::i!:
" !;(L'L'
(J)0L'
0::W"'<
0z0L'
«(J)& :I:
"'<
I-§
6'6>
(J)z0"'< ~<9,
...I
~~ U...I,,) «" u~s
c.00::,,)
0I
" W
<9~
0::
~(J)
~~
(J)
w0::-Yo.
c.
°0 ~, ~p.,C' 1.9
"?C'~'''(~E
L!)
0~0L!)0L!)0r-...:
r-...:<0cDl!'il!'i"<l''<t
J. Marx Ayres, P.E. Page 2 -14
Low-Pressure EFVs
Table 2 - 5
Pressure-Drop Calculations WithSanders At Meter
And At Each Appliance
Calculations
SECT Qd NOMINALd ACTUALLSKhRES PRESSCFH
ININFT INWCINWC1-2
22511.04910.60.533470.008476.991530863"T"
22511.0490.750.60.533470.006356.9851790102-3
22511.04910.60.533470.008476.976709872ilL"
22511.04920.60.533470.016946.9597715983-4
22511.04910.60.533470.008476.951302460GAS COCK
22511.04950.60.533470.042356.908956773EFV
2251 0.56.4089567735-6
22511.04910.60.533470.008476.400487636ilL"
22511.04920.60.533470.016946.3835493616-7
22511.049100.60.533470.084696.298857988ilL"
22511.04920.60.533470.016946.2819197137-8
22511.049200.60.533470.169386.112536966"T"
22511.0490.750.60.533470.00635. 6.1061851138-9
890.750.824100.60.265390.053556.052639804"T"
890.750.8240.50.60.265390.002686.0499625399-10
300.50.622100.60.116950.031336.018636518liT"
300.50.62220.60.116950.006276.01237131410-11
270.50.622100.60.116950.025375.986997237ilL"
270.50.62210.60.116950.002545.98445982911-12
270.50.62210.60.116950.002545.981922421GAS COCK
270.50.62240.60.116950.010155.971772790EFV
27 0.55.47177279013-14
270.50.62210.60.116950.002545.469235383"L"
270.50.62210.60.116950.002545.46669797514-15
270.50.62210.60.116950.002545.464160567FLEX CONN.
270.50.62230.6 0.54.964160567
TOT PRESS DROP
PRESS DROP EXCLUDING FLEX CONNECTOR
J. Marx Ayres, P.E.
2.03584
1.53584
Page 2 -15
Low-Pressure EFVs Calculations
00
Ne::sC)
LL
/V"U
°0$1..( -0W
~ /. L y; U"/z" «
.6..(
::ia.[>..(
a.'1'y;~
«:I:
-Yo.
u«°0
wc? U'b.
~L'..( \9 C"{Z«
..(..(
0:::
0..(
WI-'~
w:!:
0..(
~6' UJ'~
0:::
w6'~
CZ«~<
UJ
:I:I-<9, §~ UJ"/ z" 0~~
i=«...J"/
:;)"
U...J
<9~
«U
'1'y;~
a.00:::
-Yo.
cI00w
0:::.6, U'b. :;)C' \9 UJ"/UJ
w~ 0:::
('~
a.
'~~L'
l!')
0l!')0l!')0l!')0r---
r--:c.Dc.D..n..n-q'-q'
J. Marx Ayres, P.E. Page 2 -16
Low-Pressure EFVs
Table 2 - 6
Calculations
Pressure-Drop Calculations WithUMAC Quake Breaker At Meter And Magne-Flo At Each Appliance
SECT Qd NOMINALd ACTUALLSKhRES PRESSCFH
ININFT INWCINWC1-2
22511.04910.60.533470.008476.991530863liT"
22511.0490.750.60.533470.006356.9851790102-3
22511.04910.60.533470.008476.976709872ilL"
22511.04920.60.533470.016946.9597715983-4
22511.04910.60.533470.008476.951302460GAS COCK
22511.04950.60.533470.042356.908956773EFV
2251 1.15.8089567735-6
22511.04910.60.533470.008475.800487636ilL"
22511.04920.60.533470.016945.7835493616-7
22511.049100.60.533470.084695.698857988ilL"
22511.04920.60.533470.016945.6819197137-8
22511.049200.60.533470.169385.512536966"T"
22511.0490.750.60.533470.006355.5061851138-9
890.750.824100.60.265390.05355. 5.452639804"T"
890.750.8240.50.60.265390.002685.4499625399-10
300.50.622100.60.116950.031335.418636518"T"
300.50.62220.60.116950.006275.41237131410-11
270.50.622100.60.116950.025375.386997237ilL"
270.50.62210.60.116950.002545.38445982911-12
270.50.62210.60.116950.002545.381922421
GAS COCK
270.50.62240.60.116950.010155.371772790
I::FV(1)
27 0.624.75177279013-14
270.50.62210.60.116950.002544.749235383ilL"
270.50.62210.60.116950.002544.746697975
14-15270.50.62210.60.116950.002544.744160567
FLEX CONN.
270.50.62230.6 0.54.244160567
TOT PRESS DROP
PRESS DROP EXCLUDING FLEX CONNECTOR
Notes:
(1) Pressure-drop calculation for Magne-Flo 5/8" valveGiven 1" WC @ 70CFH (Table 2 - 1)Ratio: Q=(hY.5h@27 CFH: 70/27=(1)A.5/(h)A.5
=O.62106"WC
J. Marx Ayres, P.E.
2.75584
2.25584
Page 2 -17
PR
ES
SU
RE
-DR
OP
CA
LC
UL
AT
ION
SW
ITH
UM
AC
QU
AK
EB
RE
AK
ER
AT
ME
TE
RA
ND
MA
GN
E
FL
OA
TE
AC
HA
PP
LIA
NC
E
c.. s: III ~ ~ ci ~1Il :0 m "'1J
III lQ CD I\.) ...•.
00
7.5
7.0
~6.
5::s0U ...
Ql-III s:
6.0
J:(.)
s::
:::.. wa::
::J5.
5(J
)(J
)w a::
a.. ~G
5.0
4.5
4.0
"':?
'"fl,
,,".
'l:"
~.L
~~
""
~,'v
":1
0'x
<t:f
.vro
','v
cP0
0~
Fig
ure
2-
9
'\~,«
«fO
J,,-
(O
J,,<
:J,,-
(
"\;f
"'"
,,""f
l,0*
-0"
'\~
,,'"
cP~~
,,":1
~C::J
0o
,,"~
~~
.,,~
0+0
v,.s
;
r o ~ I "'1J
ci III III s::
ci m "T1 < III (")
III C'l s::
III ~ o ::s III
Low-Pressure EFVs
Table 2 - 7
Pressure-Drop Calculations WithSanders At Meter And Magne-Flo At Each Appliance
Calculations
SECT Qd NOMINALd ACTUALLSKhRES PRESSCFH
ININFT INWCINWC1-2
22511.04910.60.533470.008476.991530863liT"
22511.0490.750.60.533470.006356.9851790102-3
22511.04910.60.533470.008476.976709872ilL"
22511.04920.60.533470.016946.9597715983-4
22511.04910.60.533470.008476.951302460GAS COCK
22511.04950.60.533470.042356.908956773
FV(SANDERS
2251 0.56.4089567735-6
22511.04910.60.533470.008476.400487636ilL"
22511.04920.60.533470.016946.3835493616-7
22511.049100.60.533470.084696.298857988ilL"
22511.04920.60.533470.016946.2819197137-8
22511.049200.60.533470.169386.112536966"T"
22511.0490.750.60.533470.006356.1061851138-9
890.750.824100.60.265390.053556.052639804liT"
890.750.8240.50.60.265390.002686.0499625399-10
300.50.622100.60.116950.031336.018636518liT"
300.50.62220.60.116950.006276.01237131410-11
270.50.622100.60.116950.025375.986997237ilL"
270.50.62210.60.116950.002545.98445982911-12
270.50.62210.60.116950.002545.981922421GAS COCK
270.50.62240.60.116950.010155.971772790
EFV (1)
27 0.625.35177279013-14
270.50.62210.60.116950.002545.349235383ilL"
270.50.62210.60.116950.002545.346697975
14-15
270.50.62210.60.116950.002545.344160567
FLEX CONN.
270.50.62230.6 0.54.844160567
TOT PRESS DROP
PRESS DROP EXCLUDING FLEX CONNECTOR
Notes:
(1) Pressure-drop calculation for Magne-Flo 5/8" valveGiven: 1" WC @ 70 CFH (Table 2 - 1)Ratio: Q=(hy.5h@ 27 CFH: 70/27=(1 )A.5(h)A.5
= 0.62106 "wc
J. Marx Ayres, P.E.
2.15584
1.65584
Page 2 -19
Fig
ure
2-
10r o ::E ;, ... (1
)1I
l1I
lr:
::: ... (1) m "T1 < 1Il (') III 0" r:
::: III - 0"
::::l
1Il
,,~,,0
_~.
~O
~
'"
C;
<v+
«.v
"~,,'
1--
0*"
~,~
,,'"
00x!
',,"
:1
~C
:J0
(j
~~~~~&a~~~~~~~~~~~
00~
V)-
C1l
"CJ
~C
:J~
(j~
x"'::
"~
PR
ES
SU
RE
-DR
OP
CA
LC
UL
AT
ION
SW
ITH
SA
ND
ER
SA
TM
ET
ER
AN
DM
AG
NE
-FL
OA
TE
AC
HA
PP
LIA
NC
E
7.0
4.5
4.0
7.5
'265
E.
::::l '0 () w 0::
::J5.
5en en w 0:
: Il. en <3
5.0
... Ql
.•.. III s:
6.0
.c: (J .= -
c.. s: III ~ ~ ... (1
) !' :-c rn '"C III (Q (1
) I\) I I\) o
Low-Pressure EFVs
Table 2 - 8
Pressure-Drop Calculations Without EFVs
Calculations
SECT Qd NOMINALd ACTUALLSKhRES PRESSCFH
ININFT INWCINWC1-2
22511.04910.60.533470.008476.991530863GAS COCK
22511.04950.60.533470.042356.9491851763-4
22511.04910.60.533470.008476.940716038ilL"
22511.04920.60.533470.016946.9237777644-5
22511.049100.60.533470.084696.839086390"L"
22511.04920.60.533470.016946.8221481155-6
22511.049200.60.533470.169386.652765368"T"
22511.0490.750.60.533470.006356.6464135156-7
890.750.824100.60.265390.053556.592868207"T"
890.750.8240.50.60.265390.002686.5901909417-8
300.50.622100.60.116950.031336.558864920"T"
300.50.62220.60.116950.006276.5525997168-9
270.50.622100.60.116950.025376.527225639ilL"
270.50.62210.60.116950.002546.5246882319-10
270.50.62210.60.116950.002546.522150824GAS COCK
270.50.62240.60.116950.010156.51200119311-12
270.50.62210.60.116950.002546.509463785ilL"
270.50.62210.60.116950.002546.50692637712-13
270.50.62210.60.116950.002546.504388970t-Lt:)\,. L;VI\lN.
L,fU.::>U.t5LL.~0.6 0.56.IVI
u_vvlKVI-' U.~~::>t51
PRESS DROP EXCLUDING FLEX CONNECTOR
J. Marx Ayres, P.E.
0.49561
Page 2 - 21
Calculations
/V"k
°0C'L'~ {y~L'" ~
c?
L'L'
+0.°0o tSlt>-0~O>
en>LL"<
W
I-:J06'6>
:::I:I-§en
~< z0i=<9,
e:(...J< :JU...J
",<
e:(uD..0<6>
c::cIWc::",<
:Jenenw
<9~
c::D..
'..< Sis"<6~+0.
°0tSl~~L' 00~0Lr.l0
1'-CDCDLr.lLr.l
(uwnIO:) JaleM LJoul)3~nSS3~d S"~
Page 2 - 22
Low-Pressure EFVs
J. Marx Ayres, P.E.
Low-Pressure EFVs
3.1 CSA U.S.
Section 3Discussion
Discussion
a. The CSA U.S. Requirements No. 3-92 are for EFVs that are designed to limit theflow of gas in the event that the flow through the valve exceeds the levelspecified by the manufacturer. The criteria are for valves with nominal sizes of 2"or smaller, maximum operating pressures of 250 psi or less, and capability ofoperating in 32° to 125°F environments. The test requirements include the sizeof by-pass area in automatic reset type valves to allow for equalization ofpressures. The closing flow rates are based on 0.64-SG, 1000-BTU/CF gas.The performance requirements include specified operational positions of thevalve, maximum operating pressures, leakage rates not to exceed 20 CC/Hr at1-1/2 times the maximum operating pressure, 10 CFH maximum bypass rate,and operation to reduce the flow of gas through the device to no more than itsbypass flow rate (which must be no more than 2 CFH for manual reset typeEFVs, and no more than 10 CFH for automatic reset type EFVs) whenever theflow reaches that particular device's closing flow rate, which can be anythingbetween 80% and 110%, inclusive, of the manufacturer's specified closing flowrate for that model.
b. The procurement of the CSA test results and other manufacturer literature wasdifficult. The latest UMAC and Sanders data were obtained from attachments to
the Los Angeles Mechanical Testing Laboratory's Research Reports, and theMagne-Flo data from submissions to the DSA.
3.2 Appliance Connectors
3.3
a.
b.
CSA U.S. test data for appliance connectors were not available, and publicationsfrom one manufacturer provided CSA pressure-drop data for straight flexiblemetal tubing without bends that normally occur in the field. See Appendix A. Thepublished data provided flow capacities at 0.5" WC pressure-drop with 0.64-SG,1000/BTU/CF gas per ANSI Z 21.24 CGA 6.10 for 3/8",1/2", and 5/8" nominal0.0. connectors. The UPC Table 12-10 provides capacities of "listed" applianceconnectors in 8" WC or less systems based on 0.2" WC pressure drop with 1100BTU/CF gas. Note 3 under UPC Table 12-10 states that tests were based oncomplete assemblies, including fittings and valves. The test configuration,definition of valve type, and test data were not available to the author, so all ofthe spread sheet calculations incorporated 0.5" WC pressure drop for theappliance connectors.
It should be noted that Brass Craft has recently purchased Magne-Flo and plansto offer the EFVs with their flexible connectors. If this is true, their connector andEFV should be tested and listed as a unit.
Pressure Drops
J. Marx Ayres, P.E. Page 3-1
Low-Pressure EFVs Discussion
The objective of this study was to determine the impact of EFVs on the upe0.5" we maximum piping system pressure-drop allowance. Examination ofTables 2-2 through 2-8 and Figures 2-2 through 2-11 allows the reader to identifythe various pressure drops, starting with a 7" we service. It should be noted thatminimum pressures necessary for safe and efficient appliance operation can varyfrom 5" to 3-1/2" we. It is known that the designer can in some circumstancesuse larger size pipe to off-set the EFV pressure losses, but it is not practical dueto the additional construction costs.
J. Marx Ayres, P.E. Page 3 - 2
Low-Pressure EFVs
Section 4Conclusions & Recommendations
4.1 Conclusions
Conclusions
1. When EFVs are installed in typically sized low-pressure gas systems, the totalpressure drop of the systems will exceed the UPC maximum allowed 0.5" WCpressure drop.
4.2 Recommendations
1. Building Codes should require mechanical plan checks for any low-pressure gassystems using one or more EFVs.
2. Pressure drops across flexible appliance connectors should be listed with adefined number and radii of bends or loops.
3. If a flexible connector is provided with an EFV, the pressure drops should belisted both with and without the EFV.
J. Marx Ayres, P.E. Page 4-1