1 You can find Gas entrapments without depending filling movie file
It is easy to compare Gas defects for each gating design
Change runner angle and
You can quantitatively compare gating designs based upon gas amount
Check the locations where the gas entrapments formed
Avg. gas amount = 97.8288 cc/100g
Quantitative Comparison of
Reduce 9.2% Gating Design
during filling
Check better resolution by Retained Melt Surface (RMS)
..
.. ..
Shrinkage Possibility → Shrinkage Probabilistic Model
Shrinkage Probability (Psh)
Accumulated Frequency (ω)
9
Trace of Retained Melt (Liquid Pocket) Size
Conserve Total Retained Melt Volume as Total Shrinkage Volume
Shrinkage Volume
Input Composition
Si : 7%
Fe : 0.2%
Cu : 0.2%
Mn : 0.15
Mg : 0.55%
Zn : 0.1%
Ti : 0.12%
Be : 0.055%
Vacuum Machine
You can fill up 100% of a product only using Vacuum
You can fill Thin-Walled a product by Initial (-) vacuum
After filled up, you pressurize like squeeze → High strength, Short cycle time
1 Side Vacuum
2 Upper Vacuum
3 Center (Hub)
Thin Walled -
High Strength
Upper Vacuum : ON
Side Vacuum : ON
Center Vacuum : Off
Gas entrapped near
Movie File Movie File
Modify runner / gating designs for control of these defects
Oxide & Inclusion Areas
Find Oxide Areas more Clearly
(above your critical value or standards)
Oxide layer
10 mm
The SIGAP (Shrinkage Induced Gas Porosity) model predicts
You can accurately predict shrinkage porosity which other model can’t
Spheroidal
Graphite
Austenite
Porosity
Dendrites
SIGAP
The SIGAP (Shrinkage Induced Gas Porosity) model predicts
You can accurately predict shrinkage porosity which other model can’t
Filter
Riser
overestimate shrinkages
The SIGAP (Shrinkage Induced Gas Porosity) model predicts
Accurately predict shrinkage porosity which other model overestimated
H & L Shaped Plate, 4.3 Kg
Aluminum Alloy
Green Sand
The SIGAP (Shrinkage Induced Gas Porosity) model can predict
You can accurately predict shrinkage porosity which other model can’t
RMM Over estimated
SIGAP Accurate predict
No Shrinkage defect
Liquid approach (RMM, RMS) & Gas approach (SIGAP)
First, Liquid approach then Gas approach, both make shrinkage
Pamb+Pst+Pexp+Pγ
Automatic calculation of HTC for Cooling and Heating channels
Detailed operation conditions : Media, Flux, Start /End Time & Temp., Control type
1. Auto-Measure : Length, Section Area
2. Media Selection :
by Sensor Temp.
Channel Model
Consider the flow direction of cooling media (water, oil)
Set the heat transfer coefficient along the length of channel as a curve
Low HTC
Set HTC Curve for each channel
26
Find the best meshing condition automatically (dramatically save human time)
Check thin sectioned areas automatically
Check Thin Section Area using Cross SectionGeneration of 11 Mil. Mesh : 3 sec
You can save Post Results automatically for PowerPoint in anyPOST
Please set What Results to be saved automatically
AnyPOST : Post Processing S/W Setting Data
(movies, images)
Observe results from various Angles / Cross sections without running Post
Enhance efficiency of Reporting and Sharing simulation results
PPTX file anyPOST in AnyCasting
Import Results from Post
Cross Section Movie File
Multi-results can be combined and analyzed using Logical operations
You can make a new Combination to observe the best results
Logical Operation
Gas Entrapment
(Intersection of
32
General Database : provide 600 alloys, freely modify & make user DB
Alloy Composition : Thermodynamically calculation, Phase information
General Database Alloy Composition