Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

41
- 1 - Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging 2012. 11. 14 Corporate R&D SAMSUNG ELECTRO-MECHANICS Co., Ltd. Young Do Kweon [email protected]

Transcript of Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

Page 1: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 1 -

Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

2012. 11. 14

Corporate R&D

SAMSUNG ELECTRO-MECHANICS Co., Ltd.

Young Do Kweon [email protected]

Page 2: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 2 -

Contents

1. IC PKG Trends & Issues

2. Organic Interposer of 2.5D Packaging

3. Key Challenges

Page 3: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 3 -

1. IC PKG Trends & Issues

Page 4: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 4 - ※ Source: Freescale Semiconductor (2007)

Cost Trend

Micro System Level Module Packaging could lead the higher packaging

cost, and the packaging cost could be concerned on business plan.

Page 5: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 5 -

Performance Bottleneck

Interconnect on chip would be a serious factor for IC Performance

※ Source: EMC-3D Japan/Korea Technical Symposium April 23-27, 2007

Page 6: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 6 -

Wide I/O Memory could be appeared soon, and it would be applied on

mobile first with increasing the Bandwidth dramatically

Bandwidth Requirement

※ Source: 3-D Integrated Circuits Workshop 2012

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

BW Requirement DDRx (32bit) LPDDRx (32bit)

Year

GB/S

ec BW

Gap

Page 7: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 7 -

Wide I/O Memory needs a fine pitch interconnection with high I/O

: Could PKG substrate be responded for the fine pitch interconnection ?

Mobile Processor 2011 2012 2013

GFX Single-Core 400MHz Multi-Core 500MHz Multi-Core 800MHz

0.5 Gby/s 3 Gby/s > 6 Gby/s

Display qHD60 + 1080p30 1080p60 + 1080p30 4M60 + 1080p60

1 Gby/s 2 Gby/s > 4 Gby/s

Total 1.5 Gby/s 5 Gby/s > 10 Gby/s

DRAM Configuration and Bandwidth

Single Channel LPDDR2 @ 400MHz

Dual Channel LPDDR2 @ 533MHz

Quad Channel Wide I/O

3.2 Gby/s 8.5 Gby/s 12.8 Gby/s

DRAM sub-sys’ Power/Bandwidth

80 mW/Gbyps 40 mW/Gbyps

Pin 194 194 1128

Wide I/O Memory

※ Source: 2011 ST ERICSSON

Page 8: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 8 -

Scaling Trend _ IC / PKG / PCB

An Interconnection gap between IC to PCB is increased due to the

current PCB technology limit not matched for IC interconnection

scale down, and so on.

※ Source : Yole 2010, 3D silicon and glass Interposers

Page 9: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 9 -

Packaging Interconnection

Proposed roadmap of package architecture transitions to address

the memory bandwidth challenge [ Intel 2007 ]

※ Source: Intel Technology Journal, Volume 11, Issue 3, 2007

Embedded PCB

Si Interposer

Page 10: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 10 -

Embedded PCB _ Overview

Any (active/passive) components can be embedded in PCB core layer.

Interconnections can be formed thru conventional laser drilling and Cu

plating technology

Low profile MLCCs are used for embedding

Chip Resistor

Passive embedded

Active

Via

Bump

Core

Via Via

Bump

Active IC embedded

Solder Resist

Stack Via Available

MLCC

Page 11: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 11 -

Embedding technology is especially for small form factor.

: The sizes of packages, modules and boards can be reduced via

embedding technology

Embedded PCB _ Size reduction

Page 12: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 12 -

Embedded PCB _ Noise reduction

Decoupling capacitors are commonly used to stabilize the power supply

voltage levels.

Embedded decoupling capacitor provides a lower Interconnection inductance

affected to the noise value of power and ground network

(a) Evaluation Circuit

Power

GND IC DC-DC

Converter

DC Power

Supply …

ICIC

IC

DC-DC

Converter

IC

DC-DC

Converter

(c) Detailed Internal Layout

Eliminating the inductance of Power/Ground network

Decoupling Capacitors Targeted for Embedding

4 0402 MLCC (2.2 F)

(b) Decoupling Capacitor Embedding

Input Capacitor

Output Capacitor

Power

GND

Input Capacitor

Output Capacitor

Embedded Decoupling Capacitors

Converter

Decoupling Capacitor

Page 13: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 13 -

Embedded PCB _ Thermal dissipation improvement

Tj = 26.3 ℃ Tj = 83.3 ℃

Embedded PCB shows lower junction temperature because of short

path of heat flow from chip to mother board

Thermal simulation of power amp module (4-chip PKG, z-plane cut view) Tj : Die max. temperature (Assume that Mother Board Temp. is 25 oC)

(a) Conventional PKG (b) Embedded PKG

EMC molding

Substrate

Mother board Mother board

Page 14: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 14 -

Interconnection Type _ 3D vs. 2.5D

The interconnection and Package structure could be considered with

IC thermal dissipation and performance

3D (Vertical Stacking) 2.5D (Interposer Stacking)

- Advantage : Minimization of Package Size - Disadvantage : Difficult Thermal Dissipation - TSV/Chip Stacking Technology

- Advantage : Easier Thermal Dissipation - Disadvantage : Increase Package Size - Chip Mounting Technology

※ Source: http://prohardver.hu/hir/amd_integracio_rogos_utja.html

Page 15: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 15 -

IC Power Consumption

It is important to consider the power consumption of ICs

in application : GPU power consumption will be bigger

Desktop Notebook Ultrabook

CPU (TDP) 35~77W 25~57W 15-17W

GPU (TDP) 140~250W 60~100W 14-35W

Battery capacity (Wh) - 60~95Wh 36~54Wh

Smartphone iPad/GalaxyTab

Mobile AP ~2W ~3W

Battery (Wh) ~6Wh ~25Wh

TDP : Thermal Design Power

* Tablet PC Battery Life Target : 7~10 hours

※ Source: www.wikipedia.org

Page 16: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 16 -

Si Interposer

An electrical interconnection structure used between a silicon integrated

circuit die and package, test jig, or other die that enables a reduced

contact pad pitch on the Si interposer

※ Source: Yole development, Aug 2010

Page 17: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 17 -

2. Organic Interposer of 2.5D Packaging

Page 18: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 18 -

※ Source: www.amkor.com (2012)

2.5D Packaging

Looks multi-dies system module packaging, and the performance of

module is count on the electrical interconnection quality between devices.

: Interposer should provide

a good electrical, thermal-mechanical properties such as a handling,

a low warpage, and so on.

: Interposer should provide a cost competitiveness as well.

Page 19: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 19 -

Organic Interposer _ Proto Design Study

Feature Spec Note

TSV Size 10 ㎛ Dia.

TSV Depth 100 ㎛

Metal 1 1 ㎛ L / S / T

Metal 2 & 3 2 ㎛ L / S / T

Metal 4 4 ㎛ L / S / T

Metal to Metal 1~2 ㎛ Spacing

Via 1~2 ㎛ Dia.

Organic Interposer Design

- 3+3 or 2+2+2 layer (6-layer),

Line & Space : 5/5um

Via/Pad : 30/50um, Pad pitch 40um

- Si TSV 5,590 ea → TCV 1,128

Si Interposer Example of Design Conversion

Core TCV

Metal layer Passivation layer

Page 20: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 20 -

Core Material Technology

CTE (ppm/℃)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

0 5 10 15 20

Mo

du

lus (

GP

a)

① ②

③ ④

G/C Upgrade (E-glass → T-glass)

- 50nm Size Filler - High Tg Resin (240 → 270℃)

100

① 10ppm/℃

② 6ppm/℃

③ 4ppm/℃

④ 2ppm/℃

Inorganic option

Organic Option

Low CTE Core Materials are being developed with a low CTE and

a high Tg with a high modulus.

Property Trends Measured Data

Page 21: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 21 -

Structure _ Proto sample

Symmetric structure and Various thickness of core could be used

→ Warpage controllable compared to silicon interposer

Core

Organic Interposer structure Proto Sample (6L)

Core TCV TCV

Metal layer Passivation layer

Page 22: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 22 -

Electrical Performance Modeling

Structure Comparison Modeling Result

Parameters Silicon Organic

Via Diameter 10um 100um

Via Height 100um 220/300/450um

Via Wall Thickness - 12um

Plugging Material Cu-Fill Plating Ink

Silicon Interposer *

Source: Qinghu Chin, Xin Sun, Yunhui Zhu, et.al “Design and Optimization of RDL on TSV interposer for High Freq. Applications”, 2011 ICEPT-HDP

Organic Interposer

1E7 1E8 1E9 1E6 1E10

-0.20

-0.15

-0.10

-0.05

-0.25

0.00

freq, Hz

dB

(450um

_org

anic

_m

om

..S

(2,1

))

dB

(viaTSV_mom…(S

21)

Via_S-21 (Loss) dB

dB

(300um

_org

anic

_m

om

..S

(2,1

))

dB

(220um

_org

anic

_m

om

..S

(2,1

))

TSV

450um

220um

300um

Rvia_ave @ DC~500MHz

TSV 1.9 mW

220umT 0.219 mW

300umT 0.527 mW

450umT 0.638 mW

0 500

-1.7 -1.4 -1.1 -0.8 -0.5 -0.2 0.1 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.6

-2.0

1.9

Rvia

Via Resistance, mOhm

Freq, MHz

TSV

450um

220um 300um

R_o

rga

nic

_45

0um

R_

via

TS

V

R_o

rga

nic

_30

0u

m

R_o

rga

nic

_22

0u

m

Page 23: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 23 -

New organic interposer provides bare IC to be attached directly

with using a low CTE and high modulus core organic material

Si Interposer Organic Interposer

Wafer Core Substrate Type Panel

Silicon (3ppm/K) 100㎛

Core Material (CTE) Core Thickness

Organic (4ppm/K) 60~450㎛

1㎛ Line Width 3㎛ @2013

Asymmetry (n+1) Structure (Top+Bottom) Symmetry (n+n)

Dry Etch Core Through Hole Laser Via / Mechanical Drill

PECVD + PVD+Cu Plating (Semiconductor Process)

Through Hole Filling E’less Cu+Cu Plating

(PCB Process)

Wafer Thinning Total Thickness Control Core Thickness selected

801ea/m2 (12 inch) Net Die (25 x 25mm2) 1260ea/m2 (200 x 250mm2)

※ Warpage Controlable

※ Handling trouble

Si vs. Organic Interposer

Page 24: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 24 -

Process of Organic interposer

Coating Sputtering

Plating Sawing

Photo Develop

Etching Cure

Page 25: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 25 -

Though Core Via Filling

Cu Fill Plating (A/R 1.5:1 ↓) Ink Plugging (A/R 1.5:1↑)

Two Options are available for TCV filling of organic interposer

- Less than Aspect Ratio 1.5:1 → Cu fill plating

- Above than Aspect Ratio 1.5:1 → Ink or Cu Paste Plugging,

AR 1:1

Core 0.1t Via Φ0.1

AR 2:1

Core 0.2t Via Φ0.1

AR 3:1

Core 0.3t Via Φ0.1

Stack via

Staggered via

Page 26: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 26 -

Via interconnection

Laser Via Technology has a smaller Via Size limit.

: New technology is needed for the high dense interconnection.

Via diameter (um)

Page 27: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 27 -

Resolution Result

: Define 5um via open diameter (Taper angle 55˚)

A_10um via hole

A_5um via hole

Via Profile

Page 28: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 28 -

PR Pattern for 4㎛ is available for the fine line & space 5um on this

feasibility test

Fine Pattern _ PR Development

Test Pattern (Side View) Proto Sample (Top View)

Pt Treatment

Dielectric Layer

PR

Cu/Ti seed

Line Width 3.7㎛

Space 6㎛

Thickness 14㎛T

FIB Analysis

Page 29: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 29 -

Line & Space 5㎛ is shown with wet etching method on this feasibility test

: Undercut less than 0.3um also is acceptable.

Fine Pattern _ Etching

Test Pattern (Side View) Proto Sample (Top View)

Dielectric Layer

Cu/Ti seed Pt Treatment

Plated Cu

Line Width 4.9㎛

Space 4.7㎛

Thickness 7.6㎛T

FIB Analysis

Page 30: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 30 -

3. Key Challenges

Page 31: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 31 -

Via Integrity &

Fine Patterning

Adhesion Promotion DE Cu seed Cu DE

Quick Etching Improve Selectivity

Desmear (Wet & Dry) Roughness variation Via btm cleanliness

Seed Metal Thin e’less seed Sputtered seed

Key Challenge _ Metallization/Adhesion

※ DE : Dielectric Material

Page 32: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 32 -

6um

DFR pattern DFR Pattern

Cu Plating Cu Plating

Isotropic Chemical Etching Anisotropic Etching

Non-Contact High Resolution

Thin Seed layer (Minimizing metal etch)

Minimized contamination

High etch uniformity Clean process

SubstrateSubstrate

To-Be As-Is

20um

Key Challenge _ Fine Pattern L/S 3㎛

Page 33: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 33 -

Line & Space 5㎛ is available on this feasibility test

☞ DFR foot

☞ Strip residue

☞ Etching bias control

DFR Development Cu Plating and DFR Strip Seed Etching

5/5um

L/S 3.7/6.1 6.1/3.9 4.9/4.7

Thickness 14.1 7.8 7.6

Note - Fully Strip Minimization of Undercut

Feasibility Study_ Fine Pattern L/S 5㎛

Page 34: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 34 -

Line & Space 3㎛ is shown on this feasibility test

Feasibility Study_ Fine Pattern L/S 3㎛

Strip Etching

Page 35: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 35 -

Key Challenge _ Adhesion

Before Reliability

TC 500cycle (-65℃/125℃)

HAST 192hr (130℃/85RH%)

Pt전처리Ti/Cu

Passivation

CCL

J社

Reliability (Thermal Cycle, HAST) test result

: No observed any layer delaminated until HAST 192hours

[ Vertical View ]

Page 36: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 36 -

Key Challenge _ Via integration quality

Reliability of Photo Via after TC 1500 cycle test result

: Resistivity change ratio < 2%

< TC Via Resistivity Test (-65℃/150 ℃) >

Condition : Daisy Chain, Via 30EA, Line Width 30um, Pad Dia.= Via Dia.+30um

[Unit : Ω]

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

Via Dia. 30 um

Via Dia. 60 um

Via Dia. 90 um

ΔR/R

0 (

%)

Temp. Cycle

Cycle Via Dia

0 100 300 500 1000 1500

20 1.42 1.417 1.434 1.441 1.44 1.449

30 1.374 1.373 1.388 1.398 1.398 1.402

40 1.334 1.335 1.352 1.357 1.357 1.362

50 1.257 1.257 1.272 1.277 1.277 1.282

60 1.24 1.246 1.256 1.261 1.256 1.268

70 1.222 1.221 1.238 1.242 1.241 1.247

80 1.198 1.198 1.211 1.219 1.219 1.224

90 1.16 1.159 1.173 1.177 1.173 1.182

Page 37: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 37 -

Key Challenge _ Solder on Pad

SP Printing 110 um

Feature

BSP Metal post

New Bumping method and alternative technology are needed

as a low cost solution.

Bump Pitch (um)

2007 2009 2011 2012 2015 2010 2008 2013 2014

180 130 110 90

SP

150

Advanced u-ball

Cu Post

uBall , BSP

N-SOP (Peripheral)

Page 38: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 38 -

Key Challenge _ Qualification/Interconnection

Interface

Interconnection

Method

Qualification

Silicon Device (Ultra Low K)

Organic Interposer

Material Equipment Process

※ Source: PRISMARK, Dec 8 2011

Page 39: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 39 -

Business Model

Three kinds of Supply Chain could be available.

Which one is reasonable with considering the current SCM ?

→ Issues : Simple, Stability of supply, Responsibility on quality etc.

[Model1] Foundry Plus [Model2] OSAT Plus [Model3] Third Party

※ Source: ETRI, Technical Trends of Interposer for 2.5D integration (Feb, 2012)

Page 40: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 40 -

Summary

[Environment and Issues]

A packaging cost is increasing while IC performances are increasing

Fine Pattern Technology for Wide I/O Memory is strongly needed

Interconnection Gap between IC and PCB is increasing every year

[Solutions]

3D and 2.5D packaging could be alternative PKG solutions

In terms of thermal dissipation and cost, 3D packaging has a limitation

A Si Interposer is still concerned in terms of Manufacturing Cost as well

An Organic Interposer is needed as a low cost solution without changing

the current supply chain

Page 41: Low Cost Solutions for 2.5D Packaging

- 41 -