Loren Gallimore. Background Daryl Renard Atkins, the plaintiff, went against the defendant, the...

11
ATKINS V. VIRGINIA Loren Gallimore

Transcript of Loren Gallimore. Background Daryl Renard Atkins, the plaintiff, went against the defendant, the...

Page 1: Loren Gallimore. Background Daryl Renard Atkins, the plaintiff, went against the defendant, the state of Virginia, as he was convicted of abduction, robbery,

ATKINS V. VIRGINIA

Loren Gallimore

Page 2: Loren Gallimore. Background Daryl Renard Atkins, the plaintiff, went against the defendant, the state of Virginia, as he was convicted of abduction, robbery,

BackgroundDaryl Renard Atkins, the plaintiff, went against

the defendant, the state of Virginia, as he was convicted of abduction, robbery, and capital murder.

Atkins’ trial was heard by the court in York County, VA, then by the Virginia Supreme Court, and finally by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Page 3: Loren Gallimore. Background Daryl Renard Atkins, the plaintiff, went against the defendant, the state of Virginia, as he was convicted of abduction, robbery,

Point of Law The 8th Amendment states that “excessive

bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.”

The question was, was Atkins’ death sentence too harsh for his condition?

Page 4: Loren Gallimore. Background Daryl Renard Atkins, the plaintiff, went against the defendant, the state of Virginia, as he was convicted of abduction, robbery,

Daryl Atkins

Page 5: Loren Gallimore. Background Daryl Renard Atkins, the plaintiff, went against the defendant, the state of Virginia, as he was convicted of abduction, robbery,

Original Jurisdiction

York County, VA was the first to hear this case

After hearing the case, the jury sentenced Atkins to death

Page 6: Loren Gallimore. Background Daryl Renard Atkins, the plaintiff, went against the defendant, the state of Virginia, as he was convicted of abduction, robbery,

Appeals Court

The Virginia Supreme Court took over the Atkins v Virginia case after York County

The jury again sentenced him to death

Page 7: Loren Gallimore. Background Daryl Renard Atkins, the plaintiff, went against the defendant, the state of Virginia, as he was convicted of abduction, robbery,

U.S. Supreme Court

The U.S. Supreme Court finally had to take over this case

According to the 8th Amendment, it is cruel and unusual punishment to execute a person that is mentally impaired.

Page 8: Loren Gallimore. Background Daryl Renard Atkins, the plaintiff, went against the defendant, the state of Virginia, as he was convicted of abduction, robbery,

Decision

Final Decision : 6-3

Majority Decision: Six of the judges agreed that Atkins should not be sentenced to death

Dissenting Opinion: Three judges were against Atkins being exempted of the death penalty

Page 9: Loren Gallimore. Background Daryl Renard Atkins, the plaintiff, went against the defendant, the state of Virginia, as he was convicted of abduction, robbery,

Impact

Although the 8th Amendment can protect people from excessive punishment, it can also have a downfall

In the case of Atkins v Virginia, a person convicted of murder could pretend to be mentally ill to be exempt of the death sentence

Page 10: Loren Gallimore. Background Daryl Renard Atkins, the plaintiff, went against the defendant, the state of Virginia, as he was convicted of abduction, robbery,

Justice John Paul StevensMajority Decision

Justice William H. RehnquistDissenting Opinion

Page 11: Loren Gallimore. Background Daryl Renard Atkins, the plaintiff, went against the defendant, the state of Virginia, as he was convicted of abduction, robbery,

Works Cited<http://murderpedia.org/male.A/images/atkins_daryl/atkins000.jpg>

<http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e3/US_Supreme_Court_Justice_John_Paul_Stevens_-_1976_official_portrait.jpg>

<http://supremecourtopinions.wustl.edu/application/assets/images/justice_william_h_rehnquist.jpg>