Lone Star Healthy Streams
Transcript of Lone Star Healthy Streams
![Page 1: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Lone Star Healthy Streams
![Page 2: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Clean Water Act (1972 & 1977)•
Clean Water Act (CWA) is the foundation for surface water quality protection in U.S.
•
Act is to restore and maintain chemical, physical, and biological characteristics of the nation’s waters.
•
Requires states to set standards for surface water quality and regulate wastewater discharge
•
EPA has “delegated”
responsibility for the CWA to the TSSWCB & TCEQ.
![Page 3: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Clean Water ActThe CWA has five main elements:
(1)
A system of minimum national effluent standards for each industry;
(2)
Water quality standards; (3)
A discharge permit program that translates these standards into enforceable limits;
(4)
Provisions for special problems such as toxic chemicals and oil spills; and
(5)
A revolving construction loan program (formerly a grant program) for publicly-owned treatment works.
![Page 4: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Responsible State Agencies
•
Texas State Soil & Water Conservation Board–
Charged with agricultural nonpoint source pollution oversight
–
Nonpoint source pollution originates from multiple locations, carried primarily by rainfall runoff.
•
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality–
Charged with point source pollution and urban and other nonpoint source oversight
–
Pollution from point sources can be traced to a specific location and point of discharge.
![Page 5: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Impaired WatershedsAn impaired or threatened waterbody is any waterbody that is listed according to section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act. A waterbody is considered impaired if it does not attain water quality standards. Standards may be violated due to an individual pollutant, multiple pollutants, thermal pollution, or an unknown cause of impairment. A waterbody is considered threatened if it currently attains water quality standards but is predicted to violate standards by the time the next 303(d) list is submitted to EPA. The 303(d) list is a comprehensive public accounting of all impaired or threatened waterbodies, regardless of the cause or source of the impairment or threat.
![Page 6: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Standards define the goals for a body of water. The uses prescribe the purposes forwhich the water should be suitable. Five general categories of use are defined under the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards:
■
Aquatic life■
Contact recreation
■
Public water supply■
Fish consumption
■
General uses
Texas Water Quality Standards
![Page 7: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
303(d) List: List of Impaired Water Bodies
Once a watershed is on the 303(d) list, states are required to develop management plans establishing Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) for the pollutant impairing the use of the water.
![Page 8: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
WATER QUALITY IMPAIRMENTS IN TEXASWATER QUALITY IMPAIRMENTS IN TEXAS
![Page 9: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Texas Water Bodies on the 303(d) List for 2008
•
Number of Bodies of Water:
386•
Stream/River Miles:
7,240
•
Reservoir/Lake Acres:
550,792•
Estuary Square Miles:
664
•
Ocean Coast Miles:
388
![Page 10: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Best Management Practices to Protect Water Quality
![Page 11: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Maintain Adequate Ground Cover
Soil and Water Loss
![Page 12: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Raindrop falling on bare soil can detach soil particles to be lost in runoff.
![Page 13: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Raindrop Impact…
•
Releases tremendous energy on bare soil.•
Dislodges soil particles resulting in sediment production.–
Soil loss and water loss from site.
•
Causes sealing of larger pores reducing infiltration rates (crusting).–
Increases overland water flow.
–
Water loss from site.
![Page 14: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
ProtectedUnprotected
Splash
Result
Wind
Runoff
Forces of Erosion
Sandy, rocky, stony soil Good soil management
Dead leaves on surface
From Nebel 1981
![Page 15: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Gully erosion in sand sagebrushSheet erosion. Note pedestal effect created by vegetative material.
Water Erosion Occurs As:
•• Sheet (interrill) erosion
•• Rill erosion
•• Gully erosion
•• StreambankStreambank
erosionerosion
Rill erosion
![Page 16: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
![Page 17: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Wind Erosion
•
In certain areas, effects can be worse than water erosion (i.e., US Great Plains).
•
Factors affecting wind erosion are similar to those listed for water erosion (+ wind velocity).
•
Lack of vegetative cover is the leading cause of soil loss.
![Page 18: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
![Page 19: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Grazing Effects on Soil Erosion
•
Indirectly by consumption of plant parts–
Overstocking reduces vegetative cover.
•
Exposes bare soil•
Increases runoff quantity and energy
–
Overstocking leads to overgrazing (i.e., change in plant species)
•
Generally increases runoff •
Reduces carrying capacity
•
Directly by hoof action (soil compaction)
![Page 20: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
From Taylor et al., 1993.
![Page 21: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Taylor et al. 1993
![Page 22: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Gully erosion created by a cattle trail.
![Page 23: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
With changes in management, some eroded areas can heal over
time.
![Page 24: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Maintain Adequate Ground Cover
Nutrients, Pesticides and
Bacteria
![Page 25: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Managing Nutrients•
Fertilize based on soil test recommendation.–
Reduces potential for over-application of nutrients.•
Always follow label directions when using pesticides.
•
Using the appropriate stocking rate and grazing system maintains adequate ground cover.–
Traps nutrients, pesticide, and bacteria in forage.–
Vigorous forage system reduces need for herbicides.•
Provide grass filter strips along riparian areas.–
Excess fertilizers and pesticides may prove toxic to aquatic animals and lead to destructive algae blooms.
•
Manage cattle so they do not contribute to erosion of stream banks.
![Page 26: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Vegetative Filter Strips Along Riparian Areas
•
PURPOSE: Vegetative filter strips remove sediment and other pollutants from runoff before they are carried into streams.
•
Vegetative filter strips also aid with reducing the flow rate of runoff and allow runoff to infiltrate into the soil to recharge the groundwater supply.
•
Vegetative filter strips act as a barrier and slows fast- moving water laden with sediment.
•
As water runs through the vegetative filter strip, the sediment settles and is trapped in the strip.
•
NOTE: Well-managed pastures act as large vegetative filter strips.
![Page 27: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
![Page 28: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Note denuded stream banks, sand depositions in creek, and algal bloom.
Note the effectiveness of a vegetative filter strip in trapping sediment that would have wound up in the creek or reservoir. Nutrients, pesticides and bacteria were also trapped.
![Page 29: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Minimum width for vegetative filter strips. Source: Standards and Specifications No. 393, USDA-NRCS Field Office Technical Guide, 2004.
Slope Minimum width of buffer strip
1-3% 25 ft
4-7% 35 ft
8-10% 50 ft
Filter Strip Specifications
![Page 30: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Maintain Adequate Ground Cover
Forage Persistence
and Animal Performance
![Page 31: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
![Page 32: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
![Page 33: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Forage Forage SupplySupply
Forage Forage DemandDemand
Forage Forage PerformancePerformance
Animal Animal PerformancePerformance
![Page 34: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
HighHigh
ZeroZeroVery lightVery light HeavyHeavyModerateModerateLightLight
Increasing Stocking RateIncreasing Stocking Rate
Gain/animalGain/animalNet Return/acreNet Return/acre
Gain/acreGain/acre
Maximum Net Return Maximum Net Return Occurs HereOccurs Here
![Page 35: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Stocking Rate Fundamentals
![Page 36: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Factors Influencing Stocking Rate:
• Forage Species
• Fertility
• Improved Animal Distribution
• Improved Harvest Efficiency
• Complementary Grazing Systems
![Page 37: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
Dry
Mat
ter (
lbs/
ac)
Coastal Tifton 85 Pensacola Tifton 9
Dry matter production of selected warm-season perennial grasses at Overton, TX. 1999
![Page 38: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Factors Influencing Stocking Rate:
• Forage Species
• Fertility
• Improved Animal Distribution
• Improved Harvest Efficiency
• Complementary Grazing Systems
![Page 39: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
0100020003000400050006000700080009000
DM
(lbs
/ac)
0 150AN 300AN 150U 300UN Rate and Source
Coastal bermudagrass response to different rates and sources of N
SandySC/gravel
RouquetteRouquette
and and KeislingKeisling, 1981, 1981
![Page 40: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Factors Influencing Stocking Rate:
• Forage Species
• Fertility
• Improved Animal Distribution
• Improved Harvest Efficiency
• Complementary Grazing Systems
![Page 41: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Grazing Adjustments Required Due to Distance From Water
0 - 1 mile = 0 adjustment
1 - 2 miles =
50% adjustment >2 miles =
ungrazed
![Page 42: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Problem: Poor animal distribution due to distance from water -
Solution #1: Water & salt
SALT
SALTSALT
![Page 43: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Problem: Poor animal distribution due to distance from water -
Solution #2: Cross-fencing
![Page 44: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Problem: Lack of grazeable
acres –
Adjust stocking rate for only the acres cattle have access to.
Instead of 1000 acres, there may actually only be 350 acres suitable for cattle grazing.
![Page 45: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Factors Influencing Stocking Rate:
• Forage Species
• Fertility
• Improved Animal Distribution
• Improved Harvest Efficiency
• Complementary Grazing Systems
![Page 46: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
![Page 47: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Improved Harvest Efficiency = Grazing Management
•
Continuous Stocking•
Not necessarily a sin…
-
Consider variable continuous stocking•
Rotational Stocking-
Several alternatives
-
Offers more flexibility in management
![Page 48: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Factors Influencing Stocking Rate:
• Forage Species
• Fertility
• Improved Animal Distribution
• Improved Harvest Efficiency
• Complementary Grazing Systems
![Page 49: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Complementary Grazing Systems
•
Use different kinds of animals that have minimal diet overlap. (i.e., grass-
roughage eaters + intermediate feeders or concentrate selectors)-
Example = cattle + goats
-
Example = cattle + white-tailed deer
![Page 50: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Ann
ual P
reci
pita
tion
(inch
es)
1968 1971 1974 1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001
LongLong--term annual precipitation at Overton, TX.term annual precipitation at Overton, TX. 1968 1968 --
20012001
Average
125%
75%
58%
12%
91%*
* Incomplete data* Incomplete data
![Page 51: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Suggested Management Strategies
•
USE THE PROPER STOCKING RATE!•
Use the appropriate grazing system.
•
Use perennial forage crops when possible.•
For annual crops, consider conservation tillage.
•
Watch cattle trails to prevent erosion.•
Consider using alternative water sources away from riparian zones.
![Page 52: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Managing Bacteria
•
Escherichia coli (E. coli) is the leading cause of food borne illness.
•
73,000 cases of infection and 61 deaths occur in the United States each year.
•
Because the organism lives in the intestines of healthy cattle, preventive measures on cattle ranches, during meat processing, and during the growth, harvest and processing of produce are being investigated.
![Page 53: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
CWA Bacteria Concerns:
•
Sources–
Urban, livestock, wildlife
•
Prior recommendations for livestock…–
Fence out the stream?
•
Lone Star Healthy Streams–
Funded by EPA and TSSWCB through 319 funds.
![Page 54: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Lone Star Healthy Streams
•
Developing an educational curriculum, •
Evaluating and demonstrating the effectiveness of best management practices,
•
Testing the functionality of the education program and,
•
Promoting statewide adoption of appropriate best management practices.
The goal of Lone Star Health Streams is to reduce the levels of bacterial contamination of Texas watersheds from grazing livestock by:
![Page 55: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Understanding Animal Behavior is Key to Developing BMPs
•
Where do animals water?•
Why do they water there?
•
Where do they loaf?•
Why do they loaf there?
•
How can we affect their behavior?
•
Can we affect their behavior in an economically viable manner?
![Page 56: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Initial Behavioral Aspect
•
Livestock watering in the streams…•
Our hypothesis:–
Alternative livestock watering sources will reduce bacteria levels in the stream.
•
How to test whether or not alternative is effective?
![Page 57: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Testing the Hypothesis
•
Identify watershed•
Identify cooperator
•
Begin stream water sampling to obtain benchmark bacteria data
•
GPS collars on cattle•
Obtain benchmark data for one year
•
Obtain second year data•
Compare the results
![Page 58: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Initial Project
•
Identify watershed•
Identify cooperator
•
Begin stream water sampling to obtain benchmark bacteria data
•
GPS collars on cattle•
Results to date
Plum Creek On 303d list for bacteria
![Page 59: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Initial Project
•
Identify watershed•
Identify cooperator
•
Begin stream water sampling to obtain benchmark bacteria data
•
GPS collars on cattle•
Results to date
Bill & Doris Steubing 250 acres on Clear Fork of the Plum
![Page 60: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Initial Project
•
Identify watershed•
Identify cooperator
•
Begin stream water sampling to obtain benchmark bacteria data
•
GPS collars on cattle•
Results to date
1.
Turned off water to troughs, forcing cattle to water in the stream.
2.
Began obtaining water samples entering and leaving property 1st
and 3rd
Thursday of each
month.
![Page 61: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Initial Project
•
Identify watershed•
Identify cooperator
•
Begin stream water sampling to obtain benchmark bacteria data
•
GPS collars on cattle•
Results to date
1.
Randomly place GPS collars on 6-8 cows mid point of each “season”.
2.
Leave collars on for three weeks. Data point on location collected every five minutes.
3.
Used to document cattle movement patterns.
![Page 62: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Initial Project
•
Identify watershed•
Identify cooperator
•
Begin stream water sampling to obtain benchmark bacteria data
•
GPS collars on cattle•
Results to date
![Page 63: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
0
1000
2000
3000
07/26
/0708
/02/07
08/16
/0709
/06/07
09/20
/0710
/04/07
10/18
/0711
/01/07
11/15
/0712
/06/07
12/20
/071/3
/081/1
7/08
Date
E. c
oli -
cfu
/ 10
0 m
l
Texas Water Quality Standard
Water entering propertyWater exiting property
Figure 3. E. coli levels entering and leaving project grazing management unit.
0
1000
2000
3000
07/26
/0708
/02/07
08/16
/0709
/06/07
09/20
/0710
/04/07
10/18
/0711
/01/07
11/15
/0712
/06/07
12/20
/071/3
/081/1
7/08
2/7/08
2/21/0
83/6
/083/2
0/08
4/3/08
4/17/0
85/1
/085/1
5/08
6/5/08
6/19/0
87/2
/087/1
7/08
8/7/08
8/21/0
89/4
/08
Date
E. c
oli -
cfu
/ 10
0 m
l
PC1PC2
Texas Single Sample E. coli Standard
![Page 64: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
01234567
Perc
ent o
f Tim
e
30 70 100
Buffer Width (ft)
Time Spent Near Stream by Cattle
JulyOct
Percent Time Cattle Spend Within Various Distances from Stream
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
15 feet 35 feet 50 feet
Distance from Stream
Perc
ent T
ime,
% Jul-07Oct-07Jan-08Apr-08
![Page 65: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Alternative Water Source
•
Encourages livestock to obtain water away from the stream.
•
Cost?•
Easy to implement
![Page 66: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Additional BMPs
•
Portable Shade Structures–
Behavioral Situation: Cattle spend time loafing in shaded riparian areas. This leads to increased levels of bacteria and sediment in water bodies.
–
Hypothesis: Establishment of portable shade structures will encourage cattle to spend less time in riparian areas, especially when used in conjunction with salt & mineral.
![Page 67: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Portable Shade StructuresSide View
12’
8’
10’
12’
Top View
![Page 68: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
From Drawings to Product!
![Page 69: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Portable Shade Structures
•
Coupled with salt/mineral locations, may encourage cattle to cool themselves in the shade instead of along riparian areas.
•
Moderate cost associated with building and maintaining.
•
Easy to implement after construction.
![Page 70: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
Additional BMPs
•
Single-Point Water Locations–
Behavioral Situation: Cattle water in streams. This leads to increased levels of bacteria and sediment in water bodies.
–
Hypothesis: Establishment of single-point water locations will encourage cattle to spend less time in riparian areas.
![Page 71: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
Single-Point Water Locations
•
Firm footing single-point water locations along streams designed for one animal encourages animals to spend less time in stream while watering.
•
Moderate cost associated with building and installation.
•
Easy to implement after construction.
![Page 72: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
Good ideas, but possibly too wide a watering point…
Source: NOBLE Foundation
![Page 73: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
Additional BMP
•
Use of Rip-Rap as Barriers–
Behavioral Situation: Cattle water in streams. This leads to increased levels of bacteria and sediment in water bodies.
–
Hypothesis: Use of rip-rap will discourage cattle from using existing travel corridors in riparian areas and may be as effective as exclusionary fencing but at reduced cost.
![Page 74: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
Use of Rip-Rap
•
Cattle will not travel over large rocks.
•
Use of large rocks modify cattle travel patterns.
•
Reduced cost compared to fencing?
•
Easy to implement after construction.
![Page 75: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
Exclusionary Fencing•
Current recommendation.
•
Eliminates cattle access to streams.
•
Permanent fences are expensive to construct & maintain.
•
Not feasible to fence-off entire stream in many cases.
•
Electric fencing may provide a lower-cost alternative.
![Page 76: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
Salt/Mineral Locations
•
When used in conjunction with alternative water sources or shade encourages cattle to spend time away from streams.
•
Inexpensive•
Easy to implement
![Page 77: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
Where Are We Headed?
•
Identify additional “value added”
BMPs
•
Promote adoption of BMPs.–
Develop educational materials for state-wide delivery based on BMP evaluations.
–
Be proactive rather than reactive–
Cost share assistance?•
Reduce potential for regulatory action.
•
Be good stewards of Texas water.–
It’s our state…let’s take care of it!
•
NOTE: Educational programs are designed to “inform”, not “alarm”.
![Page 78: Lone Star Healthy Streams](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022013009/61ce1b94ac18b21d3a2aad64/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
Questions?
"A thing is right if it tends to preserve the "A thing is right if it tends to preserve the stability, integrity, and beauty of the biotic stability, integrity, and beauty of the biotic
community. It is wrong if it tends otherwise."community. It is wrong if it tends otherwise." Aldo Leopold, 1966.Aldo Leopold, 1966.