Loksabha_18 dec15

40
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF PLANNING LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION NO. *300 TO BE ANSWERED ON 18.12.2015 DEVELOPMENT OF LWE AFFECTED DISTRICTS *300. PROF. A.S.R. NAIK Will the Minister of PLANNING be pleased to state: (a) the details of each of the projects undertaken under the Additional Central Assistance (ACA) for Left Wing Extremism (LWE) Affected Districts Scheme (Erstwhile Integrated Action Plan) for selected Tribal and Backward districts in the country during each of the last three years and the current year; State/UT-wise; (b) the funds released and utilized under the scheme during the said period; (c) the physical targets set and achieved in these identified tribal/backward districts during the said period; (d) whether the Government has conducted any review of the projects under the scheme; and (e) if so, the details thereof and if not, the reasons therefor along with the mechanism put in place for monitoring of utilization of fund under the scheme? ANSWER MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) FOR MINISTRY OF PLANNING AND MINISTER OF STATE FOR DEFENCE (RAO INDERJIT SINGH) (a) to (e) : A Statement is laid on the Table of the House.

Transcript of Loksabha_18 dec15

Page 1: Loksabha_18 dec15

GOVERNMENT OF INDIAMINISTRY OF PLANNING

LOK SABHASTARRED QUESTION NO. *300

TO BE ANSWERED ON 18.12.2015

DEVELOPMENT OF LWE AFFECTED DISTRICTS

*300. PROF. A.S.R. NAIK

Will the Minister of PLANNING be pleased to state:

(a) the details of each of the projects undertaken under the Additional Central Assistance (ACA) for Left

Wing Extremism (LWE) Affected Districts Scheme (Erstwhile Integrated Action Plan) for selected

Tribal and Backward districts in the country during each of the last three years and the current year;

State/UT-wise;

(b) the funds released and utilized under the scheme during the said period;

(c) the physical targets set and achieved in these identified tribal/backward districts during the said period;

(d) whether the Government has conducted any review of the projects under the scheme; and

(e) if so, the details thereof and if not, the reasons therefor along with the mechanism put in place for

monitoring of utilization of fund under the scheme?

ANSWER

MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) FOR MINISTRY OF PLANNINGAND MINISTER OF STATE FOR DEFENCE

(RAO INDERJIT SINGH)

(a) to (e) : A Statement is laid on the Table of the House.

Page 2: Loksabha_18 dec15

STATEMENT REFERRED TO IN REPLY TO PARTS (a) to (e) of LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION

NO.*300 REGARDING “DEVELOPMENT OF LWE AFFECTED DISTRICTS” BY PROF. A.S.R. NAIK

TO BE ANSWERED ON 18.12.2015

(a) to (e): The Integrated Action Plan (IAP) for Selected Tribal and Backward Districts was in operation

from 2010-11 to 2012-13. From 2013-14, assistance was provided to 88 districts under the scheme

“Additional Central Assistance (ACA) for Left Wing Extremism (LWE) Affected Districts” including the 82

IAP districts. During the period 2012-13 to 2014-15, an amount of Rs. 5219 crore was released against which

the States have reported an expenditure of Rs. 6110 crore (including spillover from previous years). The

State-wise details of funds released and utilized and the physical targets set and achieved during each of the

last three years is at Annexure I & II. The works taken up by the State Governments under the programme

included village roads, drinking water facilities and sanitation, school buildings/school infrastructure,

anganwadi centres etc. There is no allocation for this programme in Budget 2015-16.

The utilization of funds was being monitored very closely at different levels. The State Level

Committee headed by Chief Secretary / Development Commissioner of each State was entrusted with the

responsibility of monitoring at the State level. Besides statutory audit at the district level, the districts have

maintained the block wise inventory of assets created under the programme. Information on physical and

financial progress was also posted on the MIS developed for the scheme to ensure transparency. At the Central

Level, erstwhile Planning Commission / NITI Aayog took periodical reviews with the State Governments to

ensure that assets / infrastructure created under the programme were actually utilized.

Page 3: Loksabha_18 dec15

Annexure I

IAP/ACA for Left Wing Extremist Affected districts : State-wise Release and Expenditure 2012-13,2013-14 & 2014-15

(Rs. in Crore)

Sl.No

State

2012-13 2013-14 2014-15

Releases Expenditure Releases Expenditure Releases Expenditure

1AndhraPradesh

110.0 125.1 60.0 82.5 80.0 54.9

2 Bihar 190.0 198.7 158.4 301.8 220.0 253.7

3 Chhattisgarh 300.0 331.9 238.4 309.6 280.0 253.5

4 Jharkhand 510.0 357.6 184.2 366.6 340.0 414.9

5MadhyaPradesh

300.0 278.3 148.4 269.9 200.0 171.7

6 Maharashtra 50.0 48.0 50.0 57.7 80.0 58.5

7 Odisha 540.0 425.4 222.6 493.4 360.0 512.9

8 Telangana 100.0 91.6 57.1 81.1 80.0 128.9

9 Uttar Pradesh 60.0 61.1 60.0 90.2 60.0 85.5

10 West Bengal 90.0 97.8 30.0 38.9 60.0 68.5

Total 2250.0 2015.3 1209.0 2091.8 1760.0 2003.0

The expenditure exceeds the releases as it includes spill over from previous years.

Page 4: Loksabha_18 dec15

Annexure IIIAP/ACA for Left Wing Extremist Affected Districts: State-wise Physical Progress

2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15

Sl.No.

State

2012-13 2013-14 2014-15

No. ofProjectstaken up

No. ofProjects

completed

No. ofProjectstaken up

No. ofProjects

completed

No. ofProjectstaken up

No. ofProjects

completed

1AndhraPradesh

861 859 766 230 2602 1116

2 Bihar 2667 2999 6325 2338 1413 2872

3 Chhattisgarh 5639 6555 6344 4033 5027 5239

4 Jharkhand 4155 3930 5986 5240 2423 3265

5MadhyaPradesh

4951 3372 3571 3343 1810 1739

6 Maharashtra 1617 1660 3899 3594 3178 610

7 Odisha 10602 8656 8486 8082 8245 8694

8 Telangana 1320 924 2201 1058 1472 2557

9 Uttar Pradesh 1204 886 2161 2198 2161 2189

10 West Bengal 1410 1578 194 524 797 516

Total 34426 31419 39933 30640 29128 28797

Page 5: Loksabha_18 dec15
Page 6: Loksabha_18 dec15

GOVERNMENT OF INDIAMINISTRY OF PLANNING

LOK SABHAUNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 3224TO BE ANSWERED ON 18.12.2015

IAP

†3224. SHRIMATI KAMLA DEVI PAATLE:

Will the Minister of PLANNING be pleased to state:

(a) the number of districts in Chhattisgarh identified as Left Wing Extremism affected districts andincluded under the Integrated Action Plan (IAP);

(b) whether the Government proposes to include newly formed districts of Chhattisgarh; if so, the detailsthereof;

(c) whether the Government has received a proposal from the Government of Chhattisgarh to increasethe allocation for each district included under IAP from Rs. 30 crore to 50 crore annually; and

(d) if so, the details thereof and the reaction of the Government thereto?

ANSWER

MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) FOR MINISTRY OF PLANNINGAND MINISTER OF STATE FOR DEFENCE

(RAO INDERJIT SINGH)

(a) to (d) The programme Integrated Action Plan (IAP) for Selected Tribal and Backward Districts was

continued from 2013-14 as Additional Central Assistance (ACA) for Left Wing Extremism (LWE)

affected districts. The programme covered 88 districts including 14 districts of Chhattisgarh namely

Balrampur, Bastar, Bijapur, Dantewada, Gariaband, Jashpur, Kanker, Kawardha, Kondagaon, Koriya,

Narayanpur, Rajnandgaon, Sukma and Surguja till 2014-15.

From 2015-16, the programme ACA for LWE affected districts has become a part of the devolution

to the States consequent upon the recommendations of the Fourteenth Finance Commission and no

allocation has been made for it in budget 2015-16. The higher tax devolution will give the States greater

autonomy to design and finance schemes suited to local needs and aspirations, including requirements to

bridge the developmental deficit gap in backward regions.

-----------------------------.

Page 7: Loksabha_18 dec15

GOVERNMENT OF INDIAMINISTRY OF PLANNING

LOK SABHA

UNSTARRED QUESTION No. 3233TO BE ANSWERED ON 18.12.2015

PRIVATE FUNDING FOR R&D

3233. SHRI BHAGWANTH KHUBA

Will the Minister of PLANNING be pleased to State:

(a) Whether the NITI Aayog penal moots, private funding for research and development activities in

various areas;

(b) If so, the details thereof; and

(c) The reaction of the Government as well a Corporate Sector in this regard?

ANSWER

MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) FOR MINISTRY OF PLANNINGAND MINISTER OF STATE FOR DEFENCE

(RAO INDERJIT SINGH)

(a) & (b): Yes, Madam. The Expert Committee on Innovation and Entrepreneurship under the Chairmanship

of Prof. Tarun Khanna, Director, South Asia Institute, Harvard University, USA has submitted its

report in October, 2015. One of the recommendations of the Expert Committee is as under:

“1% of corporate profit could be directed towards research labs in universities and/ or industry-

university collaborative research. The government could provide some tax benefits against this.

Monitoring of this rule should focus not only on the absolute amount channelled into universities, but

also on the efficiency of spending, that is, it needs to be output-rather than input-oriented. The idea

here is that universities become the breeding ground for new technology/ ideas that can be used by the

corporate sector. Firms would implicitly be outsourcing R&D - financing development of products/

services that can be bought by them. In that sense, this financing would be perceived as absolutely core

and fundamental to a firm’s operations, rather than as a CSR-related activity. Though the actual

development of R&D may take some time, beginning the involvement of the corporate sector in the

financing of universities could be achieved relatively quickly”.

(c) A Mission High Level Committee (MHLC) of Atal Innovation Mission (AIM) has been constituted to

consider the recommendations of the Expert Committee. NITI Aayog has not received any response

from the corporate sector.

------------------.

Page 8: Loksabha_18 dec15

GOVERNMENT OF INDIAMINISTRY OF PLANNING

LOK SABHAUNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 3237TO BE ANSWERED ON 18.12.2015

STATES AUTONOMY ON EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS

3237. SHRI Y.S. AVINASH REDDY:

Will the Minister of PLANNING be pleased to state:

(a) whether, there is much ambiguity on the expenditure of funds being made on the

implementation of Centrally sponsored schemes and if so , the details thereof;

(b) whether the State Governments have requested for their autonomy on the expenditure of funds

released by the Union Government for the implementation of the Centrally sponsored schemes and if

so, the details thereof; and

(c) the response of the Union Government to this proposal?

ANSWER

MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) FOR MINISTRY OF PLANNING ANDMINISTER OF STATE FOR DEFENCE

(RAO INDERJIT SINGH)

(a) to (c): No Madam, there is no ambiguity on the expenditure of funds being made on the

implementation of Centrally sponsored schemes. 14th Finance Commission has recommended an increase of

10% in State’s share of net proceeds of Union taxes and duties. This increase from 32% to 42% underpins the

laudable objective of giving the States’ more financial autonomy. So, the increased devolution would

undoubtedly increase the quantum of untied funds available to the States which could be utilized by the States

for various schemes / programmes. The combined central transfers to the State from devolution of taxes and

CSS in 2015-16 is about 29.6% more over 2014-15 revised estimate. The detailed break-up is as follows:

Rs. croreItems 2014-15

Revised Estimate2015-16

Budget EstimateShare in Central Taxes/ devolution 3,37,808.45 5,23,958.24Provision under CSSs 1,97,111.41 1,69,510.01Total 5,34,919.86 6,93,468.25

14th Finance Commission has consulted the States extensively on various issues of the States including

their finances before giving its recommendations.

*******

Page 9: Loksabha_18 dec15
Page 10: Loksabha_18 dec15

GOVERNMENT OF INDIAMINISTRY OF PLANNING

LOK SABHAUNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 3277TO BE ANSWERED ON 18.12.2015

EVALUATION OF FLAGSHIP PROGRAMMES

*3277. SHRI S.P. MUDDAHANUME GOWDA

Will the Minister of PLANNING be pleased to state:

(a) Whether there is continuous evaluation of flagship programmes initiated by the Government and if

so, the details thereof:

(b) Whether there is an independent agency for the purpose and if so, the details thereof:

(c) Whether the Government proposes outsource of evaluation work to private agencies, if so, the details

thereof of along with the selection procedures and performance of such agencies: and

(d) Whether the Government has made any efforts to initiate social audit of all the Government schemes

and if so, the details thereof?

ANSWER

MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) MINISTRY OF PLANNINGAND MINISTER OF STATE FOR DEFENCE

(RAO INDERJIT SINGH)

(a) The Development Monitoring and Evaluation Office (DMEO), an attached office under NITI Aayog,Government of India has been conducting evaluation studies of the Central Sector / Centrally SponsoredSchemes from time to time on the behest of the Implementing Ministries. These evaluation studies arediagnostic in nature and the findings of the studies are meant for mid-course correction of the programmes.During the year, 2014-15 the DMEO has finalized the evaluation reports like Border Area DevelopmentProgramme (BADP), Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti (NVS), Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalaya (KGBV),Quick Study on Anganwadis under ICDS, Rajiv Gandhi Gramin Vidyutikaran Yojana (RGGVY). Thereports are available in the NITI Aayog website.

(b) The Development Monitoring and Evaluation Office (DMEO), an attached office under NITI Aayog,Government of India is an independent agency set up for evaluating Central Sector Schemes. The DMEOhas its Headquarters at NITI Bhavan, Parliament Street, New Delhi, having its 15 field units located in thecapital cities of the country (i.e. Kolkata, Bhubaneshwar, Guwahati, Lucknow, Patna, Bhopal, Jaipur,Chandigarh, Shimla, Thiruvananthapuram, Chennai, Hyderabad, Bangaluru, Ahmedabad, Mumbai).

(c) The NITI Aayog and the Implementing Ministries of Government of India have also been conductingevaluation studies either by in-house or by outsourcing to reputed consultants / research institutes / NGOs.For outsourcing the evaluation studies, they have been following the guidelines given in the “Manual and

Page 11: Loksabha_18 dec15

procedures for engagement of Consultants” brought out by Ministry of Finance, Department ofExpenditure.

(d) The Government of India has standing instructions to all the Implementing Ministries for performingsocial audit of the Central Sector Schemes. Generally, the Panchayati Raj Institutions are involved inconducting the social audit of the scheme like MGNREGA and Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC) etc.

--------------------------.

Page 12: Loksabha_18 dec15

GOVERNMENT OF INDIAMINISTRY OF PLANNING

LOK SABHAUNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 3333TO BE ANSWERED ON 18.12.2015

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS

*3333 SHRI DHARMENDRA YADAV:SHRI SHRIRANG APPA BARNE:SHRI ADHALRAO PATILSHIVAJIRAO:SHRI ANANDRAO ADSUL:

Will the Minister of PLANNING be pleased to state:

(a) whether there is need to have 17 Global Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and to implement it

to get 169 related goals in 2016 in India;

(b) if so, the details thereof;

(c) whether there is non-availability of sufficient data to formulate a relevant policy and also lack of

financial resources with the Government to achieve the said Global Sustainable Development Goals;

(d) if so, the details in this regard; and

(e) the steps being taken/proposed to be taken by the Government to collect sufficient data on SDGs to

formulate a relevant policy and to generate resources for the SDGs funds?

ANSWER

MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) MINISTRY OF PLANNINGAND MINISTER OF STATE FOR DEFENCE

(RAO INDERJIT SINGH)

(a) In September, 2015, the United Nations adopted the document titled Transforming our world: the 2030

Agenda for Sustainable Development adopting a new set of 17 global Sustainable Development Goals for the

next 15 years, i.e. up to 2030. These SDGs are containing 169 targets. Moreover, these are universal goals and

targets which involve the entire world, developed and developing countries (including India) alike.

Page 13: Loksabha_18 dec15

(b) The SDGs include Poverty, Employment, Education and Literacy, Health, Gender Equality and

Women Empowerment, Child Development, Water and Sanitation, Modern Energy and Decent Work,

Resilent Infrastructure, Sustainable cities, Sustainable Consumption and Production, combat climate change,

Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources, Protect ecosystems, reverse land

degradation and halt biodiversity loss, Promote peaceful and inclusive societies, provide access to justice for

all.

The Government of India has been implementing a number of Central Sector / Centrally Sponsored

Development Schemes throughout the country for the benefit of the people at the grass root level. Every year,

sufficient funds are allocated under the Union Budget to run these schemes. These schemes like Pradhan

Mantri Jan-Dhan Yojana (PMJDY), Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme

(MGNREGA), National Rural Livelihoods Mission (NRLM), National Urban Livelihoods Mission (NULM),

Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM), Rajiv Awas Yojana (RAY), Indira Awas

Yojana (IAY), National Health Mission (NHM), Sarva Shiksha Abyhiyan (SSA), Mid-Day Meal Scheme

(MDMS), Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS), Rajiv Gandhi National Drinking Water Mission

(RGNDWM), National Social Assistance Programme (NSAP), Swachh Bharat Mission etc. are addressing

most of the targets identified by the UN under the SDGs.

(c) (d) and (e) -

The Implementing Ministries of the Union Government have been collecting data on regular basis on

the CS/CSS schemes with regard to their targets and achievements. The MIS data of the Implementing

Ministries will help in mapping the SDGs. However, as the SDGs have been intimated by the UN to the

participating countries like India very recently, Government of India has initiated work to map the different

CSS schemes that are co-relating the SDGs and to identify the indicators for the targets under the SDGs.

-------------------.

Page 14: Loksabha_18 dec15

GOVERNMENT OF INDIAMINISTRY OF PLANNING

LOK SABHA

UNSTARRED QUESTION No. 3349TO BE ANSWERED ON 18.12.2015

COMMITTEE ON INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP

3349. SHRIMATI P.K. SREEMATHI TEACHER:

Will the Minister of PLANNING be pleased to State:

(a) Whether the Expert Committee on Innovation and Entrepreneurship has submitted its report;

(b) If so, the details thereof along with major recommendations;

(c) whether the Government has received any proposal for awarding cash prize to motivate peoplehaving novelty of ideas to expedite research in preparing a market of products in the country; and

(d) If so, the details thereof and the action taken thereon?

ANSWER

MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) FOR MINISTRY OF PLANNINGAND MINISTER OF STATE FOR DEFENCE

(RAO INDERJIT SINGH)

(a) & (b): Yes Madam, the Expert Committee on Innovation and Entrepreneurship under the Chairmanship

of Prof. Tarun Khanna, Director, South Asia Institute, Harvard University, USA has submitted

its report in October, 2015. The Committee has made wide ranging recommendations for short

term (where action can be taken relatively quickly to deliver almost immediate payoffs),

Medium term (that can be addressed within a 5-7 year time frame) and Long term, which are

likely to have long gestation periods, but will lead to a profound transformation in the

entrepreneurial fabric of the country. A gist of the recommendations of the Expert Committee

is at Annexure-I.

(c) & (d): No, Madam.

---------…

Page 15: Loksabha_18 dec15

Annexure-I

Gist of the recommendations of the Expert Committee on Innovations and Entrepreneurship

The Recommendations of the Expert Committee on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, constitutedby NITI Aayog under the Chairmanship of Prof. Tarun Khanna, to accelerate the entrepreneurship agendain the country, have been categorized in to short, medium, and long-term recommendations

(A) Short Term - Providing Adequate Support to Early-Stage Ventures

1. Utilization of AIM Funds:The AIM budget should be used entirely towards introducing competitions to solve pressing economic andsocial problems (12 Grand prizes/Grand Challenges annually) through the Incentivize Innovation in India(i3) programme for finding out ultra—low—cost solutions.

2. Harnessing Corporate Funds to Finance R&D by(i) Incentivizing the Corporate to invest a part of their profits in research labs in universities and/ orindustry—university collaborative research and towards corporate venture capital funds, for the purposesof investment in start—ups and/ or incubators; and (ii) Introducing a clause for directing 5% of the valueof all contracts with foreign defense companies, to fund R&D in universities.

3. Improving the Efficiency of Incubators by(i) Increasing public investment in incubators and roping in private sector funding; (ii) Creating VirtualIncubators; (iii) Keeping Incubators Up to Date; (iv) Linking Funding of Incubators with anInstitutionalized Annual Ranking; (v) Introducing Specialized Sector-based Incubation Services; and (vi)Strengthening Linkage between the Corporate Sector and Incubators.4. Utilisation of SETU Funds:

To jumpstart innovation, Rs. 500 crore from SETU funds should be used for upgrading the existingincubators in the country and the remaining Rs. 500 crore for setting up 500 Tinkering Labs across thecountry for introducing a “Make in Universities” program with one 3D printer per institute and trainedpeople.

5. Fostering a National Entrepreneurship & Innovation Movement by(i) Instituting a National Entrepreneurs’ Day; (ii) Creation of National Action Brigade-on the lines of the“Teach for India” or the National Cadet Corps (NCC); (iii) Harnessing the NRI talent pool; and (iv)Introducing “faculty entrepreneurial fellowships” to encourage professors to be Stakeholders / partners ofthe entrepreneurial and incubation eco-systems in universities.

(B) Medium Term - Creating an Enabling Environment for Innovation

1. Embracing the Platform Mindset by

(i) Creating digital platforms, similar to Aadhaar to inspire innovation & entrepreneurship Buildingsector—specif1c searchable digital platforms like: Health Care records, Pensions, Insurance, andEducation; and Digitization of government processes. AIM may be empowered to appoint India’s ChiefInformation Officer to manage the Digital Platforms programme.

2. Reforming the Education System and Upskilling Workers by

adopting a multi-layered approach which include: Reorienting school curricula; Annual assessment ofschools and faculty; Providing easy access to entrepreneurship education courses at secondary and tertiarylevels; Focusing on technology-based solutions to education; and Opening up the market to globaleducation providers.

Page 16: Loksabha_18 dec15

3. Strengthening the Intellectual Property (IP) Rights Regime

including Setting up of Dedicated IP Courts to improve the efficiency and speed in IP judgement;Increasing the number of Patent Examiners; and Establishment of National Virtual II’ Platform containinga database of all the resolved IP cases in India, as well as details of those under litigation.

4. Improving the Ease of Doing Business through

a series of measures which include: (i) Digitization of government permits; (ii) Creation of a Central IDfor enterprises; (iii) Revisiting the Companies Act to distinguish between closely held private companies,public companies, and publicly listed companies; (iv) Revisiting Section 56 of the Income Tax Act that hasgreatly impacted fair market valuation norms on angel investments; (v) Moving service tax back to actualsrather than accruals; (vi) Improving access to capital; (vii) Labour market reforms; (viii) Creation of anonline nationwide real estate registry-Registration for all real-estate transactions should be made mandatorywithin 48 hours, with strict penalties for non-compliance; (ix) Creation of an AIM Entrepreneurship Indexfor measuring entrepreneurial activity in India; (x) Creation of a separate regulatory category for newbusiness; and (xi) Creating an enabling environment for social enterprise by involving the corporate sectorto fund social enterprise.

(C) Longer Term: Addressing the Cultural Context: To expedite cultural changes, the ExpertCommittee has made the following recommendations:

1. Attach Entrepreneurship to Large Scale Economic and Social Programs like: “Swacch Bharat” toencourage and promote social entrepreneurs focused on the areas of cleanliness, hygiene and civicresponsibility.

2. Promote New, High-Potential Sectors via the “Make in India” Campaign – set-up incentivestructures to develop a few chosen high-potential industries as part of the “Make in India” initiative.

3. Foster and encourage a Culture of Coordination and Collaboration between ministries, departments,enterprises and incubator cells across the country.

4. Re-define Success:

Innovation-centred organizations within the government system must be allowed to pursue projects andexperiments that are high risk and may fail. Different measures of accountability and success must beoutlined.

5. Make Entrepreneurship Part of the Social-inclusion Agenda –

Bringing in more women, dalits, rural population and the urban underprivileged into the fold of newIndian entrepreneurs and innovators.

(D) Proposed Structure of the AIM

The Expert Committee has recommended establishment of a ‘Not for Profit’ ‘Section 8’ Company forimplementation of the Atal Innovation Mission with Vice Chairman, NITI Aayog as the Chairman, fourindependent directors from Industry, Civil Society, Academia and judiciary. In addition, there will be sevenmore Directors (Secretaries to GOI of various Ministries/Departments) on the Board of the Company.

………...

Page 17: Loksabha_18 dec15

GOVERNMENT OF INDIAMINISTRY OF PLANNING

LOK SABHAUNSTARRED QUESTION No.3365TO BE ANSWERED ON 18.12.2015

BASIC AMENITIES

3365. SHRI RAM TAHAL CHOUDHARY:SHRIMATI RAMADEVI:

Will the MINISTER OF PLANNING be pleased to State:

(a) whether the Government has made any assessment of the per capita demand and availability

of basic amenities viz., food, water, electricity and housing during the last three years;

(b) if so, the details thereof along with funds released/utilised during the last three years for

the purpose, State/UT-wise;

(c) whether the Government has fixed any target to increase such amenities in the country during

the existing12th Plan period and if so, the details thereof;

(d) the extent by which the Government has been able to achieve such targets; and

(e) the other steps taken by the Government to provide the basic amenities to the common people?

ANSWERMINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) FOR MINISTRY OF PLANNING

AND MINISTER OF STATE FOR DEFENCE(RAO INDERJIT SINGH)

(a) to (d): In the Twelfth Five Year Plan, targets were fixed to increase the basic amenities likewater, food, electricity and housing etc. The demand for water for domestic use in the ruralareas has been estimated as 40 litres per captia per day for the 12th Plan. To achieve this target,funds were released through centrally sponsored scheme namely National Rural DrinkingWater Programme (NRDWP). The State/UT- wise central funds released and utilized duringthe last three years are given at Annexure-I.

Food projections for various food items by the terminal year of the 12th Plan and also forthe year 2020-21were made while formulating the 12th Five year plan. These projections havebeen made for the country as a whole and not on per captia basis. The production of food-grainin the Year 2013-14 was 265.04 million ton and in the Year 2014-15 it is 252.68 million ton(4th Advance Estimate of the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare) and the projected

Page 18: Loksabha_18 dec15

demand for the Year 2016-17 will be 257 million ton (the projected supply for the 2016-17 isexpected to be 258 to 272 million ton) and for 2020-21, it will be 277 million ton (projecteddemand). The State-wise fund release and utilized for increasing agriculture production isgiven at Annexure-II.

As regards housing, 12th Five Year Plan recommended to enhance financial assistanceunder the IAY to ensure better quality house. Ministry of Rural Development is implementingIndira Awaas Yojana (IAY) through States/UTs by providing financial assistance of Rs.70,000/- in plain areas and Rs 75,000/- in hilly/difficult areas/ IAP districts for construction ofa new house. The schemes is designed to enable Below Poverty Line (BPL) householdsidentified by the community through Gram Sabhas on the basis of criteria suggested for suchidentification from time to time, to build/upgrade their houses, or get house sites with financialand technical assistance from the Government. The approved Budget outlay for Rural Housingfor 12th Five year plan is Rs. 59585 crore. In the first three years of the 12th Plan, Rs. 31926crores as central release has been made and 54.30 lakh houses have been constructed. Thecentral releases made under IAY during the last three years are given at annexure-III.

In the urban areas, Government of India is providing assistance to the StateGovernments for slum rehabilitation and improvement in other amenities. As per the estimatemade by a Technical Committee, constituted by the Ministry of Housing and Urban PovertyAlleviation, the overall dwelling shortage in urban area is about 18.78 million units. Under the12th plan, for slum rehabilitation, Rajiv Awaas Yojana has been launched after incorporatingthe learning’s from its pilot phase. Under this scheme, central fund for sum rehabilitation isprovided. The scheme also mandates undertaking a few pro-poor urban reforms like providingof the property rights to the slum dwellers, reserving land for housing for economically weakersection etc.

Ministry of Urban Development has also implemented the Jawaharlal Nehru Urban RenewalMission (JNNURM). JNNURM was launched in December, 2005 for a period of 7 years forassisting State Governments for providing housing and basic services to urban poor/slumdwellers in 65 select cities under the Sub Mission Basic Services to the Urban Poor (BSUP)and in other cities and towns, under the Integrated Housing and Slum Development Programme(IHSDP). The other two components of JNNURM are Urban Infrastructure DevelopmentScheme for Small & Medium Towns (UIDSSMT) and Urban Infrastructure Governance. Theextended period of JNNURM ended on 31.03.2015. Government has further extended theMission period by two years i.e. upto 31.03.2017 only to complete ongoing projects that weresanctioned upto 31.03.2012. In addition, under the 12th plan, Government has also launchedNational Urban Livelihood Mission under which urban poor are assisted for gainful self-employment and skill based employment opportunities. The scheme also has a component ofproviding assistance to the States for construction and maintenance of shelter of homeless. Thedetails of state wise allocation under NULM, RAY and JNNURM are given at Annexure-IV.Recently, Government has also launched three major schemes for urban sector viz., SmartCities Mission, Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation (AMRUT) andHousing for All. These Missions would help the common people in urban areas through

Page 19: Loksabha_18 dec15

increased access to water supply, sewer connections, public transportation, housing, improvedurban governance ensuring transparency and accountability and better delivery of services.

Per capita consumption [Gross electricity generation + Net Imports)/Mid-Year Population]of electricity on All India basis is 914.41 kWh in the year 2012-13, 957 kWh for the year 2013-14 and provisional per capita electricity consumption for the year 2014-15 is 1000 kWh. Basedon the demand projection of the 18th Electric Power Survey, Generation capacity additiontarget of 88,537 MW has been planned from conventional sources on All-India basis during12th Five Year Plan. It comprises of 72340 MW from thermal, 5300 MW from nuclear and10897 MW from hydro. In addition, the capacity addition planned from Renewable sources is30,000 MW during the 12th Five Year Plan. With this capacity addition electricity demand isexpected to be met on All India basis. This per capita consumption of electricity is expected toexceed 1200 units by the end of the 12th Plan.

(e): In addition to the above, Government of India runs schemes like Mahatma Gandhi NationalRural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), National Rural Livelihoods Mission(NRLM) and National Social Assistance Programme (NSAP), Swatch Bharat Mission, PradhanMantri JAN Dhan Yojana (PMJDY), etc. which intended to enhance income, mitigate povertyand improve the living standards of the people living below the poverty line.

******

Page 20: Loksabha_18 dec15

Annexure-IAnnexure to Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 3365 due for answer on 18/12/2015 regarding “Basic Amenities”

Allocation, Release and Expenditure during the last three years and current year under National Rural Drinking Water Programme(NRDWP)

(Rs. in crores)Sl.No.

State/UT 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15Allocation Release Expenditure Allocation Release Expenditure Allocation Release Expenditure

1 ANDHRAPRADESH

563.39 485.14 672.82 635.44 631.52 662.40 364.30 377.78 427.08

2 BIHAR 484.24 224.3 293.09 432.38 338.95 307.43 441.07 340.48 381.903 CHHATTISGARH 168.89 148.64 162.85 136.13 135.2 172.38 159.08 150.74 165.224 GOA 6.07 0.03 0 5.5 0 2.22 4.61 0.00 0.005 GUJARAT 578.29 717.47 797.93 533.73 515.07 627.95 509.48 405.58 491.446 HARYANA 250.24 313.41 275.54 229.46 229.52 301.15 213.04 277.98 228.827 HIMACHAL

PRADESH153.59 129.9 124.06 138.51 130.81 153.33 131.84 120.89 120.18

8 J & K 510.76 474.5 488.09 462.43 414.82 499.79 441.33 474.41 458.039 JHARKHAND 191.86 243.43 204.87 172.85 243.29 277.96 169.86 175.18 206.88

10 KARNATAKA 922.67 869.24 874.78 868.75 897.29 928.81 605.38 563.91 622.3711 KERALA 193.59 249.04 193.62 155.58 212.04 265.1 115.59 124.10 131.8612 MADHYA

PRADESH447.33 539.56 426.56 404.80 474.95 483.98 397.18 440.18 399.94

13 MAHARASHTRA 897.96 846.48 612.61 788.47 690.27 657.46 780.06 748.23 901.9614 ODISHA 243.91 210.58 249.39 227.35 317.07 288.08 205.69 230.67 257.2915 PUNJAB 101.9 144.27 121.22 96.89 147.95 159.05 93.88 97.38 90.2316 RAJASTHAN 1352.54 1411.36 1314.18 1231.05 1332.49 1572.96 1194.46 1304.64 1386.7917 TAMIL NADU 394.82 570.17 625 273.63 387.11 527.57 367.36 382.46 432.3918 TELANGANA 0 0 0 0 0 0 200.65 212.24 189.2519 UTTAR PRADESH 1060.87 980.06 600.77 923.19 794.93 858.5 962.43 1036.30 1146.1820 UTTARAKHAND 159.74 74.28 147.99 145.58 87.61 138.59 135.01 111.48 152.9421 WEST BENGAL 523.53 502.36 536.43 490.63 485.83 757.11 436.53 431.09 480.72

Page 21: Loksabha_18 dec15

Sl.No.

State/UT 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15Allocation Release Expenditure Allocation Release Expenditure Allocation Release Expenditure

22 ARUNACHALPRADESH

145.32 223.22 220.98 201.23 237.32 230.97 64.21 109.83 119.50

23 ASSAM 525.71 659.21 594.02 470.00 514.98 635.18 501.10 545.87 586.8824 MANIPUR 69.99 66.21 59.11 58.76 55.3 57.17 90.35 88.54 92.2525 MEGHALAYA 73.96 97.61 101.44 92.18 103.4 114.81 44.61 69.50 81.0226 MIZORAM 48.35 47.92 33.88 38.42 44.89 33.37 42.43 34.50 39.8127 NAGALAND 110.25 110.2 108.56 56.66 61.07 52.38 103.19 101.44 86.4528 SIKKIM 36.69 32.36 38.89 16.88 26.56 71.25 30.38 31.70 32.0329 TRIPURA 70.66 100.59 99.36 59.29 89.93 94.19 62.06 68.31 64.8130 A&N ISLANDS 1.15 0.78 0 1.04 0.09 0.64 0.86 0.81 0.4331 CHANDIGARH 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 032 D&N HAVELI 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 033 DAMAN & DIU 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 034 DELHI 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 035 LAKSHADWEEP 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 036 PUDUCHERRY 1.75 0.88 0 1.59 0.06 0 1.62 0 0

Total 10290.02 10473.20 9978.04 9348.40 9600.32 10931.78 8869.64 9056.22 9774.65Source: IMIS website of Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation (As on 14.12.2015)

Page 22: Loksabha_18 dec15

Annexure-IIAnnexure to the Lok Sabha Unstarred question no. 3365 due for answer on 18.12.2015 regarding ‘Basic Amenities’

Sl.

No.Alloc. Rel. Exp. Alloc. Rel. Exp. Alloc. Rel. Exp. Alloc. Rel. Exp. Alloc. Rel. Exp. Alloc. # Rel. Exp.

1 Andhra Pradesh601.98 577.79 577.79 163.51 152.94 130.17 62.07 43.8 26.07 17.93 17.93 38.82 0 0 0 0

2 Arunachal Pradesh40.31 24.94 24.94 10.33 10.33 5.17 20.54 20.09 6.37 48.95 47.42 47.42 0

3 Assam 399.57 399.57 399.57 41.85 30.86 47.82 15.89 0 0 0 0 0 30.8 37.49 37.49 0

4 Bihar 724.01 700.2 687.39 115.56 65.72 60.39 38.07 23.9 27.77 9.19 9.19 9.85 0

5 Chhattisgarh 581.12 571.22 570.91 77.41 52.6 50.11 20.38 19.15 6.32 7.55 7.55 11.12 0

6 Goa 62.43 35.27 35.02 - 0.4 0 0 0 0 0 0

7 Gujarat 586.87 610.87 610.87 57.73 54.5 42.61 35.34 35.34 17.67 5.18 5.18 18.68 1.38

8 Haryana 199.49 179.88 179.62 61.74 46.53 39.58 15.82 2.46 5.44 4.35 4.35 6.88 1.21

9 Himachal Pradesh73.48 59.27 59.27 28.24 20.25 20.46 19.54 19.54 6.35 0.65 0.65 0.67 30 27.55 27.55 0

10 Jammu & Kashmir112.08 103.22 102.01 18.49 11.87 5.47 36.04 16.8 0 0.42 0.42 1.44 35.2 18.25 18.25 0

11 Jharkhand 241.55 219.38 216.19 37 24.79 26.42 8.94 2.29 2.25 0

12 Karnataka 586.52 549.15 549.15 123.05 110.21 109.1 46.21 33.11 20.58 14.81 14.81 40.44 0

13 Kerala 282.26 253.03 252.69 2.59 1.37 2.15 11.1 10.41 5.55 0 0 0.2 0

14 Madhya Pradesh448.13 448.13 448.13 281.91 247.15 241.33 61.74 56.8 22.81 56.91 56.91 56.83 0

15 Maharashtra 1025.81 1050.81 1050.81 247.44 241.81 217.78 82.38 82.38 30.63 36.7 36.7 31.74 2.9

16 Manipur 52.94 47.97 47.97 12.16 12.16 12.16 20.54 25.54 14.26 45.9 48.93 48.93 0

17 Meghalaya 105.34 22.68 22.68 9.3 9.3 8.81 23.25 23.25 9.39 35.05 29 29 0

18 Mizoram 200.91 184.73 184.73 6.04 6.04 6.04 14.33 19.33 14.33 0 0 0 43.1 43.1 43.1 0

19 Nagaland 85.75 85.75 85.75 11.64 11.64 11.64 23.25 23.25 11.63 43.55 43.55 43.55 0

20 Odisha 503.1 468.28 468.28 75.97 63.52 64.72 31.82 10.81 0 10.68 10.68 18.31 0

21 Punjab 146.93 86.83 86.83 82.91 37.93 36.33 15.96 7.97 0 0 0 0 1.3

22 Rajasthan 363.09 348.18 348.18 154.28 126.42 115.2 56.19 32.89 18.14 36.89 36.89 37.37 0

23 Sikkim 29.47 15.21 15.21 2.08 2.08 1.71 18.6 18.6 7.8 - 43.3 42.89 42.89 0

24 Tamil Nadu 659.68 613.27 613.27 52.06 39.7 38.56 31.75 29.29 9.75 8.22 8.22 13.9 0.5

25 Tripura 56.43 56.43 56.43 21.88 21.84 21.84 18.6 18.6 5.82 0 0 0 44.8 44.8 44.8 0

26 Uttar Pradesh432.26 294.52 294.52 322.18 211.03 201.23 105.85 105.85 36.84 6.66 6.66 9.65 0

27 Uttarakhand 44.36 8.21 8.21 23.92 16.25 11.34 22.51 14.31 7.12 19.35 10.23 10.23 0.21

28 West Bengal 464.81 374.58 374.58 60.01 41.89 42.47 40.89 18.42 0 6.65 6.65 4.99 0 0 0 0

Total 9110.68 8389.37 8371 2101.28 1670.73 1570.61 898 714.18 312.89 222.8 222.8 300.89 420 393.21 393.21 7.6# No State-wise allocation was made under the scheme.

Details of State-wise funds allocated, released and expenditure on Schemes being implemented by Department ofAgriculture & Cooperation during 2012-13

Name ofthe State

Rashtriya Krishi VikasYojana

(RKVY)

National Food SecurityMission(NFSM)

Macro ManagementScheme(MMA)

Integrated Scheme ofOilseeds,Pulses,Oil Palm

and Maize (ISOPOM){ now (NMOOP)}

Horticulture Mission forNorth East & Himalayan

States(HMNE & HS)

Soil Health Management(SHM)

Page 23: Loksabha_18 dec15

Sl.

No.

Alloc. Rel. Exp. Alloc. Rel. Exp. Alloc. Rel. Exp. Alloc. Rel. Exp. Alloc. Rel. Exp.

1 Andhra Pradesh116.45 87.34 121.34 295 289.93 270.21 29.21 21.61 24.6 0.2 0.2 0.17 1.4 0 0.87

2 Arunachal Pradesh 4 0 0 11.65 9.16 9.05 6.21 5.22 5.22

3 Assam 4 0 0 20.59 7.26 9.53 10.2 9.47 9.47

4 Bihar 46.75 35.06 30.11 70 52 53.4 50.93 43.58 52.68 2.8 1.12 0.79

5 Chhattisgarh 106.25 91.36 70.28 40 31.72 26.78 15.53 10.5 18.24 4.04 3.18 3.18

6 Goa 3.4 1.25 2.38 0.39 0 0.07 2.23 0 0 0.1 0 0

7 Gujarat 106.25 100.13 92.87 190 182 182.01 23.18 34.25 35.74 2.07 1.4 1.4 1.9 1.57 1.36

8 Haryana 90.95 90.62 82 32 30 25.71 12.92 7.6 7.95 0.85 0.73 0.6

9 Himachal Pradesh 7.26 9.31 10.37 1.49 0.89 0.89

10 Jammu & Kashmir 4 0 0 13.92 9 5.84 0.3 0 0

11 Jharkhand 63.75 47.81 61.94 25 25 22.26 25.72 30.66 26.75 2.52 0.64 0.64

12 Karnataka 119 113.04 90 150 140.65 151.22 19.1 15.27 16.62 6.31 4.93 4.93 0.7 0.58 0.62

13 Kerala 72.25 35 35.31 3 3 2.6 12.71 15.67 17.28 0.19 0 0

14 Madhya Pradesh55.25 30.09 23 100 63.84 80.52 38.27 34.63 28.82 2.7 0 0 1 1 0.99

15 Maharashtra 136 127.87 93.04 250 150.18 152.21 34.91 41.01 41.68 1.5 0 0 2.4 2.34 2.31

16 Manipur 5 1.25 0 8.93 4.76 4.17 14.69 13.36 13.36

17 Meghalaya 4 0 0 7.1 4.97 3.49 0.9 0 0

18 Mizoram 6 0 0 4.69 1 4.86 18.82 17.05 17.05

19 Nagaland 4 0 0 7.31 9.34 8.24 18.31 16.6 16.6

20 Odisha 68 65.8 68.6 12 20 16.9 29.38 42.5 52.54 5.02 4.64 4.64 0.85 0.85 0.85

21 Punjab 62.9 57.9 58.16 20 10 7.46 15.46 9.92 10.87 0.79 0 0 0 0 0

22 Rajasthan 80.75 41.2 49.09 150 110 103.47 30.06 22.45 27.15 2.52 1.88 1.88 0.7 0.63 0.49

23 Sikkim 8 2 0 3.02 2.44 1.99 3.42 3.27 3.27

24 Tamil Nadu 68 56 98.9 90 83 132.35 34.58 22.41 24.94 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.44

25 Tripura 5 0 0 6.71 3.89 3.93 0.65 0.5 0.5 1 0 0

26 Uttar Pradesh 59.5 32.36 40.08 15.61 5.95 3.93 85.47 69.21 64.55 2.81 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.14 0.15

27 Uttarakhand 6 1.5 0.7 10.86 4.63 5.51 2.54 0.77 0.77

28 West Bengal 38.25 19 32.67 1 0 0 35.65 19.84 13.86 0.2 0 0 0.3 0.28 0.13

Total 1293.7 1031.83 1049.77 1494 1202.02 1231.8 597.35 506.87 531.25 111.8 85.92 85.56 11.9 8.62 8.81

Details of State-wise funds allocated, released and expenditure on Schemes being implemented byDepartment of Agriculture & Cooperation during 2012-13

(Rs. in Crore)

Name ofthe State

National Horticulture Mission(NHM)

Micro Irrigation ( MI )( OFWM)

Support to State ExtensionProgrammes for Extension Reforms(ATMA) { now

under (NMAET)}

National Bamboo Mission (NBM)Technology Mission on Cotton

(TMC)

Page 24: Loksabha_18 dec15

Sl. No. Name of the State

Alloc. Rel. Exp. Alloc. Rel. Exp. Alloc. Rel. Exp. Alloc. Rel. Exp.1 Andhra Pradesh 483.23 456.87 456.87 191.87 157.37 101.73 85.94 85.94 45.672 Arunachal Pradesh 33.04 33.04 33.04 16.48 11.32 9.47 48 46.61 46.613 Assam 440.03 218.87 206.47 112.8 95.1 108.92 0 0 0 48 48 484 Bihar 527.67 254.26 246.56 96.77 15.22 55.03 0 0 2.355 Chhattisgarh 407.63 233.82 231.7 101.29 79.46 67.46 10.25 10.25 8.146 Goa 21.91 10.43 10.1 0 0 07 Gujarat 557.04 476.89 476.89 65.59 38.51 33.46 27.54 27.54 31.888 Haryana 318.57 159.29 158.15 66.06 42.15 40.45 3.63 3.63 4.329 Himachal Pradesh 77.4 77.4 77.4 22.02 21.83 21.15 0.45 0.45 0.45 32 26.19 26.19

10 Jammu & Kashmir 148.04 88.52 86.87 26.02 17.5 14.17 1.58 1.58 1.6 30 29.43 29.4311 Jharkhand 294.18 147.1 136.95 48.87 38.68 41.8212 Karnataka 794.58 467.29 466.53 144.85 127.74 110.81 23.13 23.13 22.8713 Kerala 270.78 256.24 255.64 2.6 0.89 1.1 0 0 0.3214 Madhya Pradesh 545.15 276.25 276.25 392.09 366.06 334.58 40.76 40.76 40.6715 Maharashtra 1154.93 959.69 959.69 298.98 274.33 218.28 31.32 31.32 32.9716 Manipur 40.96 23.66 23.66 26 26 25.42 48 58 5817 Meghalaya 60.89 37.98 37.95 12.81 12.31 12.45 40 40 4018 Mizoram 132.01 77.41 77.41 7.5 7.5 7.5 1.46 1.46 1.46 48 48 4819 Nagaland 52.59 30.07 30.07 20 20 19.46 48 47.45 47.4520 Odisha 508.42 529.42 529.42 86.62 68.74 60.36 14.5 14.5 11.921 Punjab 448.24 229.44 229.44 66.2 37.56 58.13 0 0 022 Rajasthan 735.24 735.24 728.95 218.15 126.35 147.79 40.18 40.18 34.9323 Sikkim 20.2 10.2 10.2 3.38 2.12 2.15 45 49.36 49.3624 Tamil Nadu 301.53 269.96 269.96 65.63 37.65 51.56 12.06 12.06 10.2325 Tripura 74.28 70.5 70.5 35 34.09 34.65 0 0 0 49 56.14 56.1426 Uttar Pradesh 746.69 561.09 525.5 366.13 245.05 239.91 10.08 10.08 5.5527 Uttarakhand 88.02 44.03 44.03 23.69 13.46 16.3 0 30 30 3028 West Bengal 508.14 265.08 265.08 82.56 59.93 55.53 3.34 3.34 5.26

Total 9791.39 7000.04 6921.28 2599.96 1976.92 1889.64 306.24 306.23 260.57 466 479.18 479.18

Details of State-wise funds allocated, released and expenditure on Schemes being implemented byDepartment of Agriculture & Cooperation during 2013-14 (Rs. In crores)

Rashtriya Krishi Vikas Yojana(RKVY)

National Food Security Mission(NFSM)

Integrated Scheme ofOilseeds,Pulses,Oil Palm and

Horticulture Mission for NorthEast and Himalayan States

Page 25: Loksabha_18 dec15

Sl. No. Name of the State

Alloc. Rel. Exp. Alloc. Rel. Exp. Alloc. Rel. Exp. Alloc. Rel. Exp. Alloc. # Rel. Exp.

1 Andhra Pradesh 127.5 91.06 95.43 295 265.56 265.56 0.23 0 0 26.92 20.19 25.49 1.78

2 Arunachal Pradesh 1 0 0 16.72 16.67 16.67 9.37 6.97 8.77 0

3 Assam 2 0 0 15.19 15.18 15.14 14.67 4.36 7.16 0

4 Bihar 42.5 20 23.75 70 57.5 42 1.63 0 0 47.17 40 38.86 0

5 Chhattisgarh 114.75 90.62 115.85 40 30 22.5 5.71 5.15 5.11 15.18 13.78 16.06 0.72

6 Goa 4.25 4 1.33 0.4 0.17 0.22 0 0 0 2.3 0 0 0

7 Gujarat 119 119 110.59 200 220 203.06 3.96 3.03 3.03 22.23 36.31 35.08 0

8 Haryana 102 93.44 103.05 40 33 32.16 11.91 6.22 7.45 0

9 Himachal Pradesh 3 3 3.3 1.41 0.95 0.95 6.85 9.39 11.33 0

10 Jammu & Kashmir 4 0 0 1.51 1.08 0.84 13.09 5.44 9.79 0

11 Jharkhand 68 50.04 62.05 30 15 0 0.55 0.35 0.16 24.55 31.68 38 2.57

12 Karnataka 119 69.74 99.69 175 173.3 186.19 9.66 9.66 9.66 17.59 8.72 14.38 0

13 Kerala 85 30 34.23 7.5 5.62 0 1.01 0.96 0.96 11.66 14.08 15.69 2.29

14 Madhya Pradesh 80.75 75 49.17 110 106.52 96.82 8.25 7.93 7.93 35.72 40.37 48.92 0

15 Maharashtra 144.5 674.6 156.49 250 141.01 124.7 1.52 0.5 0.5 32.11 49.71 55.91 0.77

16 Manipur 5.44 1.5 0 14.35 12.13 12.13 7.28 1.29 3.88 0

17 Meghalaya 1 0.5 0 2.67 0 0 5.82 3.97 1.68 0.1

18 Mizoram 9 6.75 0 20.16 20.09 20.09 3.97 0.55 4.18 0.4

19 Nagaland 5 0 0 20.29 20.29 20.29 6.05 8.05 10.04 0

20 Odisha 85 84.1 85.12 15 25.86 28.81 5.72 5.47 5.47 27.14 35.27 38.81 5.77

21 Punjab 63.75 58.19 56.12 20 5 5.91 0.54 0 0 14.46 8.55 4.83 0

22 Rajasthan 85 62.5 50.23 150 80 79.29 2.06 1.23 1.14 27.99 30.02 37.44 0

23 Sikkim 6 5.89 0 3.01 2.8 2.37 2.53 1.9 2.27 0

24 Tamil Nadu 97.75 92.87 112.74 90 86.9 167.92 1.04 0 0 32.2 27.83 38.89 1.81

25 Tripura 3.39 1 0 1.1 0.58 0.58 5.32 3.97 4.77 0

26 Uttar Pradesh 59.5 35 42.63 15.61 2 3.04 1.85 0.85 0.75 78.69 51.88 70.9 0

27 Uttarakhand 6 5.4 6.4 1.46 0.87 0.81 10.25 5.26 5.83 0

28 West Bengal 42.5 8 39.31 1 0 0 0.91 0 0 32.87 13.91 15.4 0

Total 1446.56 1660.48 1240.24 1555.34 1271.48 1267.88 142.52 125.78 124.6 550 480.94 573.27 16.21

# No State-wise allocation was made under the scheme

Details of State-wise funds allocated, released and expenditure on Schemes being implemented byDepartment of Agriculture & Cooperation during 2013-14 (Rs.in crores)

National Horticulture Mission(NHM)

National Mission on MicroIrrigation NMMI

National Bamboo Mission(NBM)

Support to State ExtensionProgrammes for State Reforms(ATMA) { now under (NMAET)}

Soil Health Management (SHM)

Page 26: Loksabha_18 dec15

Sl.

No.Alloc. Rel. Exp. Alloc. Rel. Exp. Alloc. Rel. Exp. Alloc. Rel. Exp. Alloc. # Rel. Exp.

1 Andhra Pradesh 267.07 263.54 244.4 132.24 75.64 129.92 74.58 64.68 94.97 51.36 17.98 50.74 3.93

2 Arunachal Pradesh 27.83 13.92 13.92 17.51 7.5 14.51 4.08 2.04 2.04 0.62

3 Assam 483.53 267.71 175.69 112.06 95.82 85.21 17.72 8.86 5.09 0.82

4 Bihar 564.55 545.73 403.2 96.78 74.68 52.44 42.5 17 22.4 2.31 1.54 1.8 5.52

5 Chhattisgarh 385.44 341.75 338.43 95.89 47.94 50.25 120.7 111.88 109.39 5.34 3.2 1.93 1.22

6 Goa 25.63 0 0 - - 4.68 0 2.22 0 0 0 1.9

7 Gujarat 593.55 290.03 254.45 49.94 13.92 10.67 130.9 109.47 82.08 36.65 14.01 2.08 1.08

8 Haryana 372.03 254.68 152.5 55.72 36.49 38.51 112.2 65.45 91.6 6.92 2.42 3.93 0

9 Himachal Pradesh 86.11 86.11 86.11 19.37 17.98 18.81 0 0 0 1.99

10 Jammu & Kashmir 150.5 78.25 31.79 26.05 10.2 18.47 1.35 1.01 0.31 7.36

11 Jharkhand 306.94 153.15 96.59 39.78 23.35 23.73 68 49.69 30.33 2.38 1.19 0 0

12 Karnataka 884.17 632.22 543.07 169.03 134.19 103.17 124.95 96.08 105 22.45 20.22 17.08 0.5

13 Kerala 321.4 300.7 287.31 3.15 3.13 1.44 85 40 37.54 0.69 0.41 0.07 1.01

14 Madhya Pradesh 547.55 511.78 444.47 340.91 214.71 197.26 89.25 42.23 47.05 75.07 45.06 25.77 5.6

15 Maharashtra 1013.49 942.09 312.57 370.99 194.71 304.13 158.95 140 70.16 45.44 34.08 34.58 5.04

16 Manipur 43 43 43 15.42 14.82 15.41 2.65 1.98 0 0

17 Meghalaya 68.77 60.64 34.19 10.09 9.63 9.86 1.25 0.63 0 0

18 Mizoram 113.92 113.92 113.92 7.08 7.08 7.08 8.91 6.68 6.68 0.08

19 Nagaland 52.75 52.75 52.75 20.17 19.41 20.13 4.55 4.55 2.42 0.4

20 Odisha 504.13 482.07 447.51 86.46 53.98 61.42 93.5 71.75 46.75 15.82 9.26 5.67 1.51

21 Punjab 508.71 413.71 156.13 51.3 40.83 37.64 70.13 58.5 44.11 1.15 0.4 0.33 1.75

22 Rajasthan 740.55 695.28 687.24 2.83 2.42 2.83 89.25 42.66 50.23 50.85 47.85 25.39 0.3

23 Sikkim 18.98 9.49 7.94 269.29 213.88 158.38 0.69 0.69 0.26 6.12

24 Tamil Nadu 298.95 298.95 298.95 76.39 73.49 69.01 107.95 55.36 74.74 10.59 8.43 8.93 1.85

25 Telangana 180.89 179.64 179.64 85.43 66.03 69.33 59.71 45 29.11 10.91 6.19 18.76 3.7

26 Tripura 80.27 80.27 62.83 30.88 29.66 29.66 5.12 5.12 3.56 0.5

27 Uttar Pradesh 704.93 589.47 439.67 335.4 254.85 226.23 68 37.32 33 14 11.73 7.36 6.79

28 Uttarakhand 95.39 80.7 47.6 17.39 8.98 3.44 0

29 West Bengal 598.61 582.34 475.24 68.98 54.32 63.98 42.5 18.74 15 9.58 6.03 7.69 3.75

Total 10039.6 8363.89 6431.11 2606.53 1799.64 1822.92 1542.75 1065.81 985.68 407.83 261.55 232.47 63.34

Details of State-wise funds allocated, released and expenditure on Schemes being implemented byDepartment of Agriculture & Cooperation during 2014-15 (Rs. In crores)

Name of the StateRashtriya Krishi Vikas

Yojana (RKVY)National Food Security

Mission (NFSM)National Horticulture

Mission (NHM)

National Mission onOilseeds and Oil Palm

(NMOOP){Earlier (ISOPOM)}

Soil Health Management(SHM) `

Page 27: Loksabha_18 dec15

Sl.

No.

Alloc. Rel. Exp. Alloc. Rel. Exp. Alloc. Rel. Exp. Alloc. Rel. Exp. Alloc. Rel. Exp. Alloc. # Rel. Exp.

1 Andhra Pradesh 121.48 121.48 351.1 14.75 22.64 16.37 0.84 0 0 13 10.04 5.22 1.24

2 Arunachal Pradesh 50 23.77 23.77 0.71 0 0 9.7 7.13 5.23 13.76 12.82 12.81 4.73 4.73 2 0.12

3 Assam 48 29.09 29.09 1.42 1 0.95 15.06 7.49 5.64 10.65 2.97 0 3 3 0 0.51

4 Bihar 49.7 35 2.98 22.1 23.61 43.55 0.76 0 0 5 5 3.63 2.53

5 Chhattisgarh 28.4 10 6.62 10.01 11.83 10.41 5.12 3.8 3.13 11.44 11.44 4.92 0.66

6 Goa 0.28 0.2 0.1 0.26 0 0 0 0 0 0.12

7 Gujarat 142 140.68 137.06 24.14 44.86 41.01 4.39 2.91 2.91 22.5 22.5 3.52 0.81

8 Haryana 28.4 23 16.31 7.25 2.83 6.59 0.34

9 Himachal Pradesh 48 42.42 62.14 2.13 1.5 1.5 7.41 11.85 10.1 1.36 0.81 0.73 7.58 7.58 7.56 0.24

10 Jammu & Kashmir 60 45 30.8 2.84 0 0.67 3.6 3.24 2.3 2.03 0.77 0 2.5 2.5 0.91 0.32

11 Jharkhand 21.3 15 0 15.95 15.06 26.94 1.98 0.4 0 10 10 6.45 0.51

12 Karnataka 124.25 124.25 117.4 14.55 11.47 10.38 6.16 4.65 2.63 15 15 12.44 1.27

13 Kerala 5.33 3.75 3.75 14.88 17.68 16.12 1.13 1.1 0.93 5 5 2.5 1.13

14 Madhya Pradesh 78.1 66.5 67.14 34.49 50.06 50.76 6.84 6.81 6.81 24.98 24.98 14.12 1.43

15 Maharashtra 177.5 177.5 177.5 32.55 34.13 29.74 2.69 0.59 0.47 40 40 39.55 2.16

16 Manipur 50 44.17 44.17 3.86 2.72 0 4.58 6.71 4.43 10.23 8.62 8.58 5 5 5 0.13

17 Meghalaya 40 27.6 27.6 0.71 0 0 3.22 2.44 2.06 3.09 0.97 0.97 4.84 4.84 2.45 0.14

18 Mizoram 52 41 41 6.39 4.5 0 3.1 1.72 3.17 13.96 12.3 12.1 4.88 4.88 4.88 0.12

19 Nagaland 52 34.76 24.76 3.55 0 0 6.97 7.56 7.67 11.37 11.36 10.68 5.46 5.46 5.46 0.13

20 Odisha 10.65 10.14 10.57 30.98 44.48 36.53 5.64 3.88 3.88 13 13 6.41 0.8

21 Punjab 14.2 0 0.88 14.61 19.95 12.76 0 0 0 0.26

22 Rajasthan 106.5 75 95.16 16.78 24.43 14.25 2.2 0.31 0 25 25 1.18 1.43

23 Sikkim 49 44.5 28.41 4.26 4.26 4.26 2.07 3.51 1.81 3.01 0.57 0.52 4.6 4.6 4.07 0.12

24 Tamil Nadu 63.9 56.63 89.39 36.1 36.94 32.16 1.21 0.15 0.15 30 30 29.79 1.32

25 Telangana 87.97 77.57 66.02 10.66 13.47 14.11 10 10 7.17 0.93

26 Tripura 54 37 37 7.1 2 2 2.34 1.94 1.58 1.99 0.81 0.55 4.5 4.5 4.5 0.18

27 Uttar Pradesh 11.08 3 3.22 78.04 69.98 38.06 2.58 0.5 0 20 20 17.59 3.54

28 Uttarakhand 46 32.73 44.36 7.1 6.98 2.45 3.63 6.96 1.99 0.99 0.29 0 7 7 6.88 0.23

29 West Bengal 0.71 0 0 28.18 17.14 20.21 0.93 0 0 5 5 3.72 1.17

Total 549 402.04 393.1 1111.82 962.66 1157.03 467.96 521.11 465.93 114.93 77.38 67.86 304.01 301.05 201.92 23.89

# No State-wise allocation was made under the scheme and the scheme is being implemented only from 2014-15.

Details of State-wise funds allocated, released and expenditure on Schemes being implemented byDepartment of Agriculture & Cooperation during 2014-15 (Rs. In crores)

Name of the StateHorticulture Mission for North

East and Himalayan States(HMNE&HS)

On Farm Water Management(OFWM)

{ Ealier (NMMI) }

Support to State ExtensionProgrammes for ExtensionReforms (ATMA) { under

NMAET}

National Bamboo Mission (NBM)Rainfied Area Development

(RAD)Soil Health Card

(SHC)

Page 28: Loksabha_18 dec15

Annexure IIIAnnexure to the Lok Sabha Unstarred question no. 3365 due for answer on 18.12.2015regarding ‘Basic Amenities’

Indira Awaas Yojana (IAY)(Rs. in lakh)

States/UTs 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15Center Release Center

ReleaseCenterReleaseAndhra

Pradesh84243.65 114122.78 42660.11

ArunachalPradesh

3327.41 5706.51 1813.74Assam 57349.21 90006.56 92867.67Bihar 171817.38 295703.99 103487.97Chhattisgarh 16780.23 50327.44 39984.45Gujarat 20813.87 26652.67 5041.49Haryana 6357.54 9831.14 9492.49HimachalPradesh

2178.76 4226.62 1433.54Jammu &Kashmir

5775.1 5642.49 4232.39Jharkhand 25707.73 35268.67 21030.14Karnataka 20787.96 49293.63 28524.51Kerala 14539.64 22626.02 16075.33MadhyaPradesh

39232.78 47268.56 57020.43Maharashtra 51306.53 75540.13 94599.37Manipur 2137.81 3649.98 2715.77Meghalaya 4894.99 8063.52 4629.68Mizoram 1080.27 2570.02 455.24Nagaland 3641.79 7328.37 4575.01Orissa 46799.86 84418.51 68403.59Punjab 659.49 2739.95 0.00Rajasthan 26211.11 46886.92 41385.74Sikkim 348.25 877.03 1287.47Tamilnadu 36956.84 56206.02 38213.49Telangana - - 41035.18Tripura 6186.32 12800.43 12244.45Uttar Pradesh 87774.23 145531.68 161431.1Uttarakhand 4081.19 6405.19 4004.4West Bengal 43631.13 86566.87 210429.28Pondicherry 0.00 0.00 0.00A&N Islands 791.81 221.31 0.00Lakshadweep 0.00 137.47 0.00D&N Haveli 0.00 0.00 81.17Daman & Diu 0.00 0.00 0.00Goa 490.39 380.29 540.429Total 785903.26 1297000.8 1109695.6

Page 29: Loksabha_18 dec15

Annexure-IVAnnexure to the Lok Sabha Unstarred question no. 3365 due for answer on 18.12.2015regarding ‘Basic Amenities’

State-wise Year-wise Release of Centrally Sponsored Schemes NULM dealt byMoHUPA

(In Rs. Crore)

S.no States/UTs 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15

1 2 3 4 51 Andhra Pradesh 28.19 0 40.34

2 Arunachal Pradesh 1.3 2.42 1.94

3 Assam 34.29 34.66 0

4 Bihar 19.34 23.52 0

5 Chattisgarh 27.39 9.91 14.88

6 Goa 3.2 9.59 0.62

7 Gujarat 48.96 26.64 63.54

8 Haryana 3.36 1.66 16.08

9 Himachal Pradesh 2.96 52.23 6.05

10 Jammu Kashmir 17.82 1.88 9.99

11 Jharkhand 50.58 6.08 10.13

12 Karnataka 26.35 2.18 63.47

13 Kerala 71.15 36.56 0

14 Madhya Pradesh 103.52 30.57 51.58

15 Maharashtra 4 47.25 128.54

16 Manipur 2.35 90.74 8.37

17 Meghalaya 6.53 2.41 4.20

18 Mizoram 4.43 4.34 8.52

19 Nagaland 16.69 4.37 5.32

20 Odisha 0.38 4.45 18.08

21 Punjab 13.44 23.04 0

22 Rajasthan 19.77 18.2 42.01

23 Sikkim 1.75 0.66 1.52

24 Tamil Nadu 112.69 59.22 64.40

25 Telangana 0

26 Tripura 85.61 65.8 9.46

27 Uttar Pradesh 47.07 94.87 46.55

28 Uttarakhand 6.26 6.54 0

29 West Bengal 75.01 58.12 53.73

Grand Total 834.39 717.91 672.14

Page 30: Loksabha_18 dec15

Including Affordable Housing Project (Rajasthan Rs. 2.2522 crore in F.Y 2011-12, KarnatakaRs. 0.8292 Crore in F.Y 2012-13 & Gujarat Rs. 41.1120 Crore in F.Y 2014-15)

Year -wise Releases under Rajiv Awas Yojana (RAY) (Rs. In crores)

Sl.No State Year 2011-12 Year 2012-13 Year 2013-14 Year 2014-15

1 Andhra Pradesh 7.42 16.99 15.95 6.772 Arunachal Pradesh 0.00 0.00 12.91 14.863 Assam 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004 Bihar 0.00 0.00 0.00 114.515 Chhattisgarh 0.00 2.03 25.46 14.316 Goa 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.007 Gujarat 0.00 0.00 86.06 95.278 Haryana 0.00 0.00 90.84 18.109 Himanchal Pradesh 0.00 0.00 9.21 0.00

10 Jammu and Kashmir 0.00 0.00 6.26 0.0011 Jharkhand 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.2512 Karnataka 0.00 0.83 265.34 141.8213 Kerala 11.57 0.00 2.32 11.4914 Madhya Pradesh 31.43 11.21 24.63 113.3215 Maharashtra 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0016 Manipur 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0017 Meghalaya 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0018 Mizoram 0.00 3.16 0.00 0.0019 Nagaland 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.2320 Odisha 6.07 20.88 32.23 77.0821 Punjab 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.7822 Rajasthan 11.45 18.88 80.09 87.5723 Sikkim 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0024 Tamilnadu 0.00 11.57 10.31 54.3525 Telangana - - - 48.1326 Tripura 0.00 0.00 0.00 29.9727 Uttar Pradesh 0.00 11.62 39.36 65.4128 Uttarakhand 0.00 0.00 0.00 65.3529 West Bengal 0.00 0.00 4.76 6.81

UT Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Grand Total 67.94 97.18 705.73 1045.38

Page 31: Loksabha_18 dec15

State/UT wise releases under JNNURM (Rs. in crores)

S.no Name ofState

Central Share Approved Central Share Released

BSUP IHSDP Total BSUP IHSDP Total

1 A&N Island - 8.90 8.90 - 5.53 5.53

2 AndhraPradesh

716.95 414.48 1,131.42 700.32 425.50 1,125.82

3 ArunanchalPradesh

54.46 8.96 63.42 54.46 8.96 63.42

4 Assam 97.60 47.27 144.87 64.19 46.55 110.74

5 Bihar 5.07 380.79 385.86 78.19 276.96 355.15

6 Chandigarh(UT)

300.94 - 300.94 379.03 - 379.03

7 Chhattisgarh 254.84 138.93 393.77 211.21 158.85 370.06

s D&N Haveli - 2.38 2.38 -- 1.67 1.67

9 Daman & Diu - 0.51 0.51 - 0.29 0.29

10 Delhi 1,155.44 - 1,155.44 1,118.17 - 1,118.17

11 Goa - - - 1.15 0.70 1.85

12 Gujarat 987.30 204.45 1,191.76 935.69 247.00 1,182.69

13 Haryana 27.81 190.73 218.54 31.18 188.96 220.14

14 HimachalPradesh

5.14 48.79 53.93 7.37 37.94 45.31

15 Jammu &Kashmir

134.44 112.75 247.19 52.38 109.50 161.88

16 Jharkhand 52.50 86.66 139.16 82.18 86.98 169.17

17 Karnataka 405.29 222.58 627.87 384.03 221.76 605.79

18 Kerala 213.44 140.29 353.73 213.91 165.17 379.08

19 Lakshadweep - - - - - -

20 MadhyaPradesh

230.75 160.31 391.06 263.50 194.52 458.01

21 Maharashtra 1,907.67 1,087.75 2,995.43 2,083.04 1,163.14 3,246.18

22 Manipur 43.91 32.35 76.26 43.91 32.35 76.26

23 Meghalaya 28.51 14.41 42.92 36.21 15.70 51.91

24 Mizoram 79.73 29.78 109.51 79.73 29.78 109.51

25 Nagaland 105.60 41.30 146.90 105.60 41.30 146.90

26 Orissa 42.54 172.47 215.01 46.72 163.29 210.00

27 Puducherry 34.41 2.74 37.15 38.02 2.74 40.75

Page 32: Loksabha_18 dec15

S.no Name ofState

Central Share Approved Central Share Released

BSUP IHSDP Total BSUP IHSDP Total

28 Punjab 45.44 27.19 72.64 47.49 89.71 137.19

29 Rajasthan 105.25 506.45 611.71 131.64 535.50 667.15

30 Sikkim 29.06 17.92 46.98 29.06 17.92 46.98

31 Tamilnadu 1,022.22 400.45 1,422.67 1,022.00 398.77 1,420.77

32 Telangana 680.39 227.86 908.25 722.36 232.18 954.54

33 Tripura 13.96 38.05 52.01 13.96 38.05 52.01

34 Uttar Pradesh 798.04 605.75 1,403.79 876.60 718.18 1,594.78

35 Uttarakhand 23.03 60.88 83.91 28.16 73.09 101.25

36 West Bengal 1,571.37 663.06 2,234.43 1,579.49 703.23 2,282.72

Grand Total 11,173.11 6,097.18 17,270.29 11,460.94 6,431.79 17,892.73

Page 33: Loksabha_18 dec15

ACA Committed and Release status in Water Supply Sector: UIDSSSMT (Rs. In Lakhs)

State ApprovedCost

ACACommitted

ACA Released2012-13 2013-14 2014-15

Andhra Pradesh 179570.00 145245.76 582.60 0.00 0.00Assam 1871.42 1700.61 0.00 0.00 0.00Bihar 9872.25 7897.80 0.00 0.00 0.00Chhattisgarh 29414.88 23531.90 0.00 9318.49 0.00Dadra & Nagar Haveli 1864.73 1491.78 0.00 0.00Gujarat 43051.40 34585.21 0.00 1838.81 0.00Himanchal Pradesh 30905.22 24724.18 2594.07 8182.15 0.00Jammu & Kashmir 25734.11 23335.34 8408.37 3171.98 0.00Jharkhand 11279.76 9144.74 1287.12 3224.78 0.00Karnataka 93812.08 75243.29 1590.28 20802.70 0.00Kerala 34143.55 27513.04 12278.24 1136.76 0.00Madhya Pradesh 204531.77 164103.37 32914.37 33847.41 0.00Maharashtra 282565.73 226800.02 10529.58 31107.06 0.00Manipur 6277.00 5670.09 2824.65 0.00 0.00Mizoram 1555.04 1399.54 699.77 0.00 0.00Orissa 40702.73 32612.95 1278.44 13385.94 0.00pondicherry 3918.00 3134.40 0.00 0.00 0.00Punjab 5930.54 4744.43 1784.81 347.40 0.00Rajasthan 16185.72 13058.19 29.22 376.40 0.00Sikkim 1580.82 1446.45 0.00 0.00 0.00Tamil Nadu 79391.12 63512.90 1523.43 9495.22 0.00Uttar Pradesh 88767.44 71305.23 0.00 13904.72 0.00Uttarakhand 3587.00 2869.60 0.00 1434.80 0.00West Bengal 79185.72 63611.04 9675.65 9902.56 0.00Grand Total 1275698.03 1028681.85 88000.60 161477.18 0.00

Page 34: Loksabha_18 dec15

ACA Committed and Release status in Water Supply Sector: UIG (Rs. In Lakhs)

StateApproved

CostACA

CommittedACA Released

2012-13 2013-14 2014-15Andhra Pradesh 222785.06 87953.51 5609.64 0.00 0.00Arunachal Pradesh 7725.32 6952.79 2147.75 0.00 0.00Bihar 56735.86 29374.63 1213.84 0.00 0.00Goa 7121.83 5697.48 1424.37 0.00 0.00Gujarat 139170.78 67939.15 3088.26 4963.59 0.00Haryana 49349 24674.50 2513.71 0.00 0.00Jammu & Kashmir 26937 23353.30 5838.33 0.00 0.00Jharkhand 65424.15 41363.82 10340.96 0.00 0.00Karnataka 65213.81 44815.30 6357.48 5483.12 0.00Madhya Pradesh 84035.55 44023.73 979.66 0.00 0.00Maharashtra 529567.36 232682.96 11237.58 12088.84 0.00Manipur 8975.19 8077.67 0.00 2019.41 0.00Mizoram 1680.94 1512.85 227.05 0.00 0.00Punjab 6296 3148.00 -1467.90 0.00 0.00Rajasthan 35515 28412.00 3328.40 0.00 0.00Sikkim 7261.66 6535.49 1633.87 0.00 0.00Tamil Nadu 230160.84 97901.55 3423.16 8311.98 0.00Tripura 7826 7043.40 1760.85 0.00 0.00Uttar Pradesh 219475.13 108279.59 1076.25 0.00 0.00Uttarakhand 12334.13 9867.30 563.41 0.00 0.00West Bengal 337365.63 122521.34 16328.94 776.76 0.00Grand Total 2120956.24 1002130.36 77625.61 33643.70 0.00

Page 35: Loksabha_18 dec15
Page 36: Loksabha_18 dec15

GOVERNMENT OF INDIAMINISTRY OF PLANNING

LOK SABHAUNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 3388TO BE ANSWERED ON 18.12.2015

MID TERM APPRAISAL OF 12th PLAN

3388 SHRI JOSE K. MANI :SHRI RAVNEET SINGH:

Will the Minister of Planning be pleased to state:

(a) whether the Government has completed the mid-term review of the Schemes of 12th Five Year Plan ;

(b) if so, the details of the achievements made regarding the schemes related to the basic needs like water,

electricity, health and education; and

(c) the targets fixed for investment in basic infrastructure during the 12th Five Year Plan, along with the

investment made in this regard so far?

ANSWER

MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) FOR MINISTRY OF PLANNINGAND MINISTER OF STATE FOR DEFENCE

(RAO INDERJIT SINGH)

(a) to (c): Pursuant to the decision taken in the meeting of the Governing Council held on 8th February, 2015,

NITI Aayog has undertaken appraisal of the 12th Five Year Plan which is in advance stage of finalization. The

appraisal document will be made available in public domain in due course of time.

*******

Page 37: Loksabha_18 dec15
Page 38: Loksabha_18 dec15

GOVERNMENT OF INDIAMINISTRY OF PLANNING

LOK SABHAUNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 3411TO BE ANSWERED ON 18.12.2015

CROP INSURANCE

3411 : SHRI GAURAV GOGOI:SHRI JYOTIRADITYA M. SCINDIA:

Will the Minister of PLANNING be pleased to state:

(a) whether the Union Government has asked NITI Aayog to consider issues of crop insurance vis-à-vis highersupport prices, to protect farmers from losses arising out of crop damage and is so, the details thereof;(b) whether the NITI Aayog has submitted any recommendations in this regard and if so, the details thereof;(c) whether the NITI Aayog has discussed the matter with the State Governments and insurance companies;and(d) if so, the reaction of the State Governments and insurance companies thereof?

ANSWERS

MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) MINISTRY OF PLANNINGAND MINISTER OF STATE FOR DEFENCE

(RAO INDERJIT SINGH)

(a) NITI Aayog’s Governing Council (GC) headed by Hon’ble Prime Minister in its first meeting held on the

8th February, 2015 discussed the problems and issues of different sectors including agriculture. The GC

decided to constitute a Task Force on Agricultural Development to suggest measures for rejuvenating

agriculture and recommend strategies for reinvigorating agricultural development in all aspects including

higher prices for agricultural produce and distress to farmers due to crop losses in event of natural calamities.

(b) The NITI Aayog’s Task Force on Agricultural Development has coordinated with the State’s task Forces

to seek their input on various issues to develop the consolidated report.

(c) & (d) The Department of Agriculture, Cooperation & farmers Welfare (DACFW), Ministry of Agriculture

and Farmers’ Welfare, Government of India has been implementing multiple crop insurance schemes such as

National Agricultural Insurance Scheme (NAIS), Modified National Agricultural Insurance Scheme

(MNAIS), Weather Based Crop Insurance Scheme (WBCIS) and Coconut Insurance Scheme (CIS) under the

umbrella of National Crop Insurance Programme (NCIP). An integrated comprehensive crop insurance

scheme Bhartiya Krishi Bima Yojana (BKBY) has been contemplated by the Department of Agriculture,

Page 39: Loksabha_18 dec15

Cooperation & Farmers Welfare (DACFW), Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare and they are seeking

suggestions from different appraising agencies including NITI Aayog and the State Governments as well as

insurance companies. The BKBY envisages providing the insurance to crops and farmer and his/her family

and assets as a package.

******

Page 40: Loksabha_18 dec15

GOVERNMENT OF INDIAMINISTRY OF PLANNING

LOK SABHAUNSTARRED QUESTION NO.3433TO BE ANSWERED ON 18.12.2015

TUBE WELL PLAN

3433. SHRI ASHOK MAHADEORAO NETE:

Will the Minister of PLANNING be pleased to state:

(a) whether a million tube well plan is being implemented in the States including Maharashtra with the

Central assistance;

(b) if so, whether any review of this plan has been conducted; and

(c) if so, the details thereof along with the number of farmers benefited by the said plan, State/UT-wise

including Maharashtra?

ANSWER

MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) MINISTRY OF PLANNINGAND MINISTER OF STATE FOR DEFENCE

(RAO INDERJIT SINGH)

(a) No scheme by name “Million Tube Well Plan” is being implemented in Maharashtra and in

other States with Central assistance.

(b) and (c) Do not arise.

*********