*19. Januar 1736 in Greenock; 19. August 1819 in Handsworth.
Locality D - Mosborough - Handsworth - CSA Profile 2017 · Locality D - Mosborough - Handsworth -...
Transcript of Locality D - Mosborough - Handsworth - CSA Profile 2017 · Locality D - Mosborough - Handsworth -...
Locality D - Mosborough - Handsworth - CSA Profile 2017 This Locality comprises the following electoral wards which were created following a boundary review in 2017.
Beighton – Birley- Mosborough – Richmond – Woodhouse.
This map shows the distribution and types of childcare across Locality D
Population
0-17 years Population Levels of school age population are close to the city average in this locality
JSA Claimants. The level of JSA claimants is close to the city average. Prior to 2016 this was JSA claimants but now includes those claiming the JSA element of Universal Credit and is expected to rise as this is rolled out city wide in 2018.
Locality B 2YO 3YO 4YO not in Reception
Eligible 3&4 YO
Mosborough/Handsworth 277 913 302 1215
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
War
d P
op
ula
tio
n
Age
Mosborough/Handsworth Population 0 to 17s
Mosborough/Handsworth Ward Locality Average0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Cla
iman
ts
Year
Number of Universal Credit Claimants in Mosborough/Handsworth
Male - Ward
Female -Ward
Male -LocalityAverage
Female -LocalityAverage
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Sheffield
Mosborough/Handsworth
Ethicity Profile of Mosborough/Handsworth White
Mixed
Asian
Black
Other
Ethnicity
The BME population is very low in this area
at only 5%
FEL Population. This area has less than
average number of 2yr olds and is close to
average for 3&4yr olds eligible for FEL.
levels of eligible 3 & 4 year olds.
Looked After Children Pre-
School Age
FEL Age Accessing
FEL Primary
Age Secondary
Age Post-
Secondary
Mosborough/Handsworth 8 3 3 15 23 15
Total in Sheffield 53 19 19 92 116 75
Outside Sheffield 33 5 0 55 103 46
Total 86 24 19 147 219 121
Special Educational Needs & Disabled (SEND) Children
Mosborough/Handsworth No on Record Statemented Education Health and Care Plan SEN Support Total SEND
Count % Count % Count % Count TS %
Primary - Years 0-6 6566 70 1.1% 53 0.8% 992 15.1% 1115 17.0%
Sheffield 0-6yrs 44067 511 1.2% 287 0.7% 6665 15.1% 7463 16.9%
Secondary - Years 7-13 4235 100 2.4% 69 1.6% 489 11.5% 658 15.5%
Sheffield 7-13 yrs 30140 604 2.0% 439 1.5% 3667 12.2% 4710 15.6%
Locality Total 10801 170 1.6% 122 1.1% 1481 13.7% 1773 16.4%
Sheffield 74207 1115 1.5% 726 1.0% 10332 13.9% 12173 16.4%
FEL Take up Spring 2017 measured across the ward locality.
Age group
Eligible Population
Children
% Take-up of Eligible Population
2 year old FEL 338 274 81.1%
3 year old FEL 994 931 93.7%
4 year old FEL 341 330 96.8%
3 & 4 year old FEL 1335 1261 94.5%
Looked After Children.
There are 3Looked After Children who are eligible
for FEL and all have taken up a place.
There are average levels of SEND children in this locality with 17% aged 0-6 years compared to Sheffield at 16.9% and aged 7-13 years
at 15.5% it is close to the city average of 15.6%.
Take up was well above the city average of 66.47% for 2 year FEL
Take up was well above the city average of 89.88% for 3 year old FEL
Take up was just above the city average of 95.5% for 4 year old FEL
Take up was well above the city average of 90.73% for 3&4 year old
FEL
This is consistently one of the areas with the highest take up rates for all
ages.
30 Hour Offer
The table below shows the numbers
and the distribution of eligible children
in each of the wards which make up
Locality D.
Ward EFE Eligible children
Beighton 190 69%
Birley 159 65%
Mosborough 165 78%
Richmond 192 62%
Woodhouse 173 59%
Locality Total 879 66%
On average about 1/3rd of children
are eligible in Locality D but this rises
to over ¾ in the Mosborough ward.
Potential providers should not use
this information to influence where
they might set up a new provision
but should carry out their own
independent market research
before making that decision.
This map shows the distribution of children eligible for the 30 hour childcare offer from September
2017 in Locality D. Areas marked red have the highest concentration of eligible children living in them
however this does not necessarily imply a need for additional places as many of these children will
already be accessing additional childcare and will flip this for funded childcare.
Childcare
Quality
Type of Childcare Number of
Settings % Outstanding/Good (of
inspected Settings) Outstanding Good
Requires Improvement
Inadequate Awaiting First Inspection
Met None
Childminder 30 100% 2 25 0 0 0 3
Day Nursery 15 100% 1 13 0 0 0 1
Nursery School 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0
Playgroup 3 100% 0 3 0 0 0 0
Reception Class 6 67% 0 4 2 0 0 0
Nursery Class in School 15 87% 2 11 2 0 0 0
Special School 1 100% 1 0 0 0 0 0
Of 66 settings inspected to date none were rated as Inadequate by Ofsted.
FEL Places.
2 year FEL Places Population PTE Capacity Places per 100
Total 338 377 112
3 & 4 year FEL Places
Total 1335 1962 147
The Local Authority has a duty to secure sufficient places for
FEL children who wish to access a place.
Across this locality there are probably sufficient FEL places for
all ages.
The national target for 2 year old FEL is 80% take up and
there are 112 places for every 100 children but there may be
a need for some additional places in the Richmond area.
For 3 &4 year olds there are 147 places for every 100 children
with substantial surpluses in all areas.
FEL Providers This table provides a list of registered FEL providers in Locality D
Provider Sector Reg Type Ofsted Rating IDACI Decile
Ward
Becton School LA RNSP Outstanding 5 Beighton
Beighton Nursery Infant School LA RECNU Outstanding 10 Beighton
Bizzy Bees Family Childcare Centre PRV DN Good 10 Beighton
Elinor Halliday (CM) PRV CM Good 6 Beighton
Fairmount Nursery (Hackenthorpe) PRV DN Good 9 Beighton
Hackenthorpe Hall Nursery PRV DN Good 5 Beighton
Jill Carruthers (CM) PRV CM Good 7 Beighton
Joanne Wilson (CM) PRV CM Good 7 Beighton
Lana Crookes (CM) PRV CM None 4 Beighton
Lisa James (CM) PRV CM Outstanding 10 Beighton
Lyndsey Groves (CM) PRV CM Good 5 Beighton
Rainbow Forge Primary School LA RECNU Requires Improvement 5 Beighton
Reignhead Primary School LA RECNU Good 4 Beighton
Stephanie Groves (CM) PRV CM Good 8 Beighton
Amanda Jane Smith (CM) PRV CM Good 9 Birley
Amanda Lawford (CM) PRV CM Good 7 Birley
Birley Community Pre-School PRV DN None 6 Birley
Birley Primary School LA RECNU Good 6 Birley
Birley Spa Primary School LA RECNU Good 3 Birley
Carole Grayson (CM) PRV CM Good 9 Birley
Charnock Hall Primary School LA REC Requires Improvement 9 Birley
Chloe Parker (CM) PRV CM Good 9 Birley
Clare White (CM) PRV CM Good 8 Birley
Elmore Kindergarten - Frecheville PRV DN Good 9 Birley
Emma Charles (CM) PRV CM Good 9 Birley
Linda Lee (CM) PRV CM Good 7 Birley
Lisa Parker (CM) PRV CM Good 9 Birley
Marie Langley (CM) PRV CM Good 7 Birley
St. John Fisher Catholic Primary School LA REC Good 3 Birley
Sunflower Children's Centre PRV DN Good 9 Birley
Deborah Martin (CM) PRV CM None 10 Mosborough
Emmanuel Stepping Stones Playgroup VOL PG Good 7 Mosborough
Halfway Nursery Infant School LA RECNU Good 4 Mosborough
Helena Wright (CM) PRV CM Good 10 Mosborough
Just for Kidz PRV DN Good 6 Mosborough
Sector Key ACD = Academy LA = Local Authority PRV = Private VOL = Voluntary – (Usually non-profit making) Registration Type Key CM = Childminder DN = Day nursery REC = Reception class RECNU= Reception & Nursery class RNSP = Reception % Nursery class in Special School PG = Playgroup IDACI Decile is a measure of Income Deprivation Affecting Children Indicator and 1 is the most deprived and 10 the least area nationally. This is used to show the location of the provider
Karen Reaney (CM) PRV CM Good 10 Mosborough
Lamb Setts Montessori Nursery PRV DN Good 9 Mosborough
Mosborough Primary School LA REC Good 9 Mosborough
Oak Valley Day Nursery PRV DN Good 4 Mosborough
Shortbrook Primary School LA REC Good 1 Mosborough
Shortbrook Primary School Daycare LA DN Good 1 Mosborough
Susan Al-Horaibi (CM) PRV CM Good 1 Mosborough
Teresa Barker (CM) PRV CM Good 4 Mosborough
Waterthorpe Nursery Infant School LA RECNU Outstanding 7 Mosborough
Amanda Dale (CM) PRV CM Good 7 Richmond
Carol Steele (CM) PRV CM Good 9 Richmond
Gleadless Primary School LA RECNU Requires Improvement 5 Richmond
Helen Dyball (CM) PRV CM Outstanding 5 Richmond
Intake Pre School VOL DN Good 5 Richmond
Intake Primary School LA REC Good 5 Richmond
Louise Robinson (CM) PRV CM Good 4 Richmond
Mandy Beal (CM) PRV CM Good 2 Richmond
Stradbroke Primary School LA RECNU Requires Improvement 5 Richmond
Sunshine Pre-School VOL PG Good 1 Richmond
Trudie Gillett (CM) PRV CM Good 4 Richmond
Woodthorpe Community Primary School LA RECNU Good 1 Richmond
Athelstan Primary School LA REC Requires Improvement 2 Woodhouse
Ballifield Primary School LA RECNU Good 3 Woodhouse
Beverley Trueman (CM) PRV CM Good 6 Woodhouse
Brunswick Primary School LA RECNU Good 2 Woodhouse
Faith Webster (CM) PRV CM Good 6 Woodhouse
Handsworth Community Nursery VOL DN Good 2 Woodhouse
Highgate Day Nursery PRV DN Good 6 Woodhouse
Jill Middleton (CM) PRV CM None 8 Woodhouse
St. Joseph's Catholic Primary School ACD RECNU Good 6 Woodhouse
Sunny Meadows Nursery PRV DN Outstanding 3 Woodhouse
Twinkles Day Nursery PRV DN Good 4 Woodhouse
Woodhouse Community Playgroup VOL PG Good 2 Woodhouse
Woodhouse Nursery PRV DN Good 6 Woodhouse
Woodhouse West Primary School LA RECNU Good 3 Woodhouse
Teresa Barker (CM) PRV CM Good 4 Mosborough
Twinkles Day Nursery PRV DN Good 4 Woodhouse
Waterthorpe Nursery Infant School LA RECNU Outstanding 7 Mosborough
Woodhouse Community Playgroup VOL PG Good 2 Woodhouse