Local Government Contracting Service

download Local Government Contracting Service

of 25

Transcript of Local Government Contracting Service

  • 8/17/2019 Local Government Contracting Service

    1/25

  • 8/17/2019 Local Government Contracting Service

    2/25

    WHERE ARE WE

    ON

    LOCAL GOVERNMENT

    SERVICE CONTRACTING?

    GILBERT

    .

    SIEGEL

    UniversityfSouthern alifornia

    Because

    ontracting

    ut

    has been

    key

    lternative

    y

    which

    ities, ounties,

    nd

    special

    districts

    ave

    attempted

    o

    cope

    with heir

    roblems

    f

    diminishedevenue

    coupled

    with

    nrelenting

    emands or ervices nd for heir

    mprovement,nd

    be-

    cause ontracting

    s an

    ncreasingly

    sed

    lternative

    y

    ocal

    governments,

    ontinuous

    monitoring

    f theory,ractice,

    ndresultsn service

    ontractings worthwhilend,

    therefore,

    orth

    iscussing.

    hisarticle ndeavorso

    recapitulate

    elevant

    iterature

    onthe ubject nder hreemajor ubtopics:

    he nvironmentf ervice

    ontracting,

    he

    process

    f

    ontracting,

    nd valuativeesearch.

    hese

    opics apture

    he

    rincipal

    ub-

    jects

    nthe

    iterature

    nderwhich

    he omain f ervice

    ontractingppears

    obe oc-

    curring.

    he context

    iterature

    xpresses

    hy

    ocal

    governments

    re

    resorting

    o

    this

    alternative

    or ervice

    elivery

    nd he xtentf his

    ction. he

    process

    f

    ontracting

    is important

    ecause

    t

    describes ractices

    ecessary

    or uccess.

    inally,

    scan

    ofre-

    search

    indings

    hould

    rovide uidance

    bout unctionalreas

    n which uccess

    nd

    failure

    might

    esult,

    ther

    hings eing

    qual,

    uch

    s the nvironmental

    nd

    process

    factors.With

    he

    xception

    f

    evaluative

    esearch,

    oth

    mpirical

    nd

    nonempirical

    sources re

    cited.

    We

    are

    nterested

    n

    contracting

    ut

    for ervices

    y

    ocal

    urisdic-

    tions. hus,

    nitiativesf he tate ndfederalovernmentsre utsidef he cope, s

    arevarious ther

    ervice

    rovision

    nd

    production

    lternativesuch s

    vouchers,

    ran-

    chises,

    olunteers,

    nddivestiture.

    TheEnvironmentf

    ervice

    ontracting

    THE

    EXTENT

    OF

    CONTRACTING

    IN LOCAL GOVERNMENTS

    For a

    variety

    f reasons

    to

    be

    discussed),

    ervice

    ontracting

    as

    become

    fre-

    quentlyhosen echniqueuringhe inal ecade f his entury.iranda ndAnder-

    sen

    1994,pp.

    28-29)

    omment

    hat ome ervices

    ppear

    obe more uitable han

    th-

    ers

    for

    contracting, sing for-profit

    nd

    nonprofit

    ontractors,

    ased

    on an

    Public

    ProductivityManagement eview,

    ol.22 No.

    3,

    March 999 365-388

    C

    1999

    Sage

    Publications,

    nc.

    365

    This content downloaded from 210.187.26.2 on Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:28:50 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 8/17/2019 Local Government Contracting Service

    3/25

    366

    PPMR March 999

    International

    ity

    Management

    ssociation

    ICMA) survey

    eporting,504

    city/

    county

    uestionnaire

    esponses:

    Local governments

    eport

    he

    reatest

    se ofnonprofits

    n

    the

    eliveryfhealthndhu-

    man ervices

    nd ultural

    nd rts

    rograms....

    ome 1%

    ofmunicipalities

    nd oun-

    ties eport

    sing

    ontractsor ultural

    nd

    rts

    rogram

    perations,

    nd

    37%

    report

    us-

    ing]

    ontracts

    or

    museum

    perations....

    Local

    governments

    remore

    ikely

    ousefor-profit

    rganizations

    odeliver

    most

    ub-

    lic works/transportation

    ervices,ublic

    tilities,

    ublic

    afety,arks

    nd ecreation,

    nd

    support

    unctions.

    n 1992,

    or xample, 4%

    ofmunicipalities

    nd ounties

    eport[ed]

    contracts

    ith

    or-profit

    irms

    or

    ommercial

    olidwaste isposal....

    More han

    alf

    (54%)

    of governmentsurveyed

    urrently

    ontract

    ith.

    .

    for-profitirm[s]

    or

    ay

    care....

    Contractsith or-profitirms avebeendecreasingince 982for axbill nddata

    processing,

    perhaps

    ttributableo]

    he ower ost

    f

    nformationrocessing.

    pp. 8-29)

    Table

    1

    recapitulates

    ajor

    hanges

    hat ave

    ccurred

    nthe

    number

    f ities

    nd

    counties eporting

    ontracting

    f service

    unctions

    etween he CMA's

    1982 and

    1992 urveys.

    ote he

    ignificanthanges

    n various

    unctional

    reas.

    WHY

    CONTRACT?

    The

    reasons

    or

    ontracting

    obeyond

    ost

    avings,

    lthough

    ouche

    Ross

    1987,

    p.5) andMirandandAndersen1994,p.26) show ost avingsobethe op dvan-

    tage

    f

    ontracting

    ut.

    Other

    ignificant

    easons

    romhe ouche

    oss

    survey,

    n

    de-

    scending

    rder

    f

    mportance,

    ere

    olving

    abor

    roblems,

    haring

    isk,

    btaining

    higher

    uality

    ervice, roviding

    ervices

    not otherwise

    vailable,

    xperiencing

    shorter

    mplementation

    ime,

    nd

    olving

    ocal

    political

    roblems.

    ther

    bservers

    have

    noted

    he

    following

    dditional

    easons

    or

    ontracting:

    ontractors

    rovide

    greater

    xpertise

    nd

    have

    more dvanced

    quipment

    Ammons

    Hill,

    1995;

    Cigler,

    1990);

    contractors

    re

    better

    ble to

    maximize

    conomies

    f

    scale,

    especially

    n

    capital-intensive

    ervices

    Hirsch,

    964;

    Honadle,

    984;Stein,

    990;Stigler,

    962);

    contractorsllow voidancef tart-upostsHonadle, 984); nd f ompetitiveid-

    ding

    s

    used,

    hen

    rofit-maximizing

    irmsre

    more

    ost-effective

    nd

    ess

    wasteful

    than

    overnment

    gencies

    Savas,

    1987).

    Ferris nd

    Graddy1986)

    suggest

    hat on-

    tracting

    s

    appropriate

    hen here

    s a

    need or

    ervice

    onsistency

    ith ther

    urisdic-

    tions

    nd/or

    hen here re

    governmental

    ostreduction

    ncentive

    olicies

    n exis-

    tence,

    nd

    Kelley 1984)

    states

    hat

    he

    nability

    o maintain

    age parity

    ith

    he

    private

    ector

    n

    a

    volatile

    abormarket

    ncourages

    overnments

    o contract or

    services.

    PROBLEMS

    WITH CONTRACTING

    First

    re ome

    ontextual

    ssues

    hat an nhibitontracting

    fforts.

    ccording

    o

    Kelley 1984),

    the

    viability

    f

    contracting

    epends

    o

    a

    great

    xtent

    n the

    nviron-

    mental

    ircumstances

    f he

    urisdiction.

    he

    ge

    of

    he

    ommunity,

    or

    xample,ro-

    vides

    n

    ndication

    f

    he

    egree

    o

    whichnformal

    ractices

    ave

    eveloped

    hat

    may

    obscure nderstanding

    f

    omponent

    asks

    n he

    roduction

    f

    utputse.g.,

    nformal

    This content downloaded from 210.187.26.2 on Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:28:50 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 8/17/2019 Local Government Contracting Service

    4/25

    Siegel/

    LOCAL

    GOVERNMENT

    SERVICE

    CONTRACTING

    367

    Table

    1.

    Percentage fChange of

    10% or More

    n

    Number f Cities nd

    Counties

    Reporting se of

    Private nd

    Nonprofit

    ontracting

    etween

    982

    and 1992

    ntemational ity

    Management

    Association

    urveys

    Service

    Percentage

    Public

    works/transportation

    Commercialolid

    waste ollection

    14

    Snowplowing/sanding

    10

    Parkingot/garageperation

    15

    Bus transit

    ystem

    peration/maintenance

    22

    Airport

    peration

    19

    Disposal

    of

    ludge

    19

    Disposal

    of

    hazardous

    materials

    38

    Publicutilities

    Electric tilityperation

    nd

    management

    58

    Utility eter

    eading

    20

    Health

    ndhuman ervices

    Insect/rodentontrol

    15

    Day

    care

    facilityperation

    22

    Childwelfare

    rograms

    -10

    Operationnd

    management

    f

    hospitals

    61

    Publichealth

    rograms

    -19

    Drug/alcoholreatment

    rograms

    10

    Operation

    fhomeless helters

    59

    Parks

    nd

    recreation

    Operation

    f convention

    enters/auditoriums

    14

    Arts

    rograms

    Operation

    f

    cultural

    nd

    rts

    rograms

    48

    Operation

    f museums

    39

    Support

    unctions

    Fleet

    management

    nd

    vehiclemaintenance

    Heavy quipment

    29

    Emergencyehicles

    30

    All other ehicles

    27

    Tax

    bill

    processing

    -18

    Dataprocessing -15

    Sources.

    982

    data

    N

    =

    1,780):

    nternational

    ity

    Management

    ssociation

    1982,

    p. 3);

    1992

    data

    N

    =

    1,504):

    Miranda nd

    Andersen

    1994,

    Table

    3/5).

    arrangements

    hereby

    aulers

    emove

    arge

    tems rom

    nside

    houserather

    han

    fromhe idewalk

    nly).

    he

    xample,

    n

    urn,

    anresultn

    hidden osts

    f

    ervice

    ro-

    ductionhat renot onsideredn

    developing

    stimates

    f he

    resent

    ost

    f

    ervices.

    It

    s less

    ikely

    hat ewer

    ommunitiesillhave

    deviated rom

    olicies

    nd

    proce-

    dures o he

    xtent

    hat

    lder neshave. he

    form

    f

    government

    an

    make

    difference

    in

    he

    egree

    o

    which

    ost

    avings

    might

    ccrue rom

    ontracting.

    n

    his

    esearch,

    i-

    randa 1994) foundhat otal ndcommon unctionxpendituresndtotal mploy-

    ment rereduced

    y

    contracting

    ut n

    council-manager

    ities.

    y

    contrast,

    n

    cities

    under he

    mayor-council

    ystem,ontracting

    oes

    not

    roduce

    hese esults.

    ity

    man-

    ager

    entral

    udgetary

    ontrols

    thought

    o account or his

    ifference.

    hus,

    weak

    managerial

    ontrolf he ervice

    rovision

    rocess

    an

    resultn n

    environmenthere

    savings

    nd

    mprovements

    ight

    ot ccur.

    This content downloaded from 210.187.26.2 on Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:28:50 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 8/17/2019 Local Government Contracting Service

    5/25

    368

    PPMR March 999

    Legal

    restrictions

    n contractingften

    re ssociated

    ith he xistence

    f trong

    municipal

    mployee nions.

    heseunions eny hat

    rivate

    ector ontractingro-

    duces mportantenefits;rgue hatmunicipalmployees,fproperly anaged,an

    achieve

    he ame

    esults;

    nd

    oppose

    he oss ofmembers'obs Halachmi

    Holzer,

    1993).

    A commonegal equirement

    s that

    ontractorsaywages

    quivalentothose

    in he ublic

    ector. his,

    f ourse,ften ill itiate

    otential

    ontractoravings. ri-

    vate

    ector roviders

    ften ay ower

    wages ndprovideewer

    enefits.

    hesevari-

    ances

    with

    ity ractices

    ay

    e

    the

    basisofcontractconomiceasibility.

    overn-

    ment nions

    ften

    epresent

    potent olitical

    orce apable f nfluencing

    lected

    officials

    ndblocking

    erviceontracting.

    here he nions

    o

    not ave

    ominant

    ev-

    erage

    with

    oliticians

    r

    trongublic

    upport,ometimes

    he

    hreatf ontracting

    s

    sufficient

    or

    management

    ogain

    oncessionsuch s changes

    nwork ules o llow

    greater

    roduction

    fficiencyHatry,988).

    However,

    nder ollective argaining,

    most

    tates ave uled

    hat ither

    he ecision o subcontract

    overnment

    ervices r

    the

    ffectsf

    thedecision

    s a

    mandatoryubject

    or ollective

    argaining

    ecause

    each

    has

    mpacts

    n

    employee orking

    onditions

    Sauter,988).

    Next

    re

    disadvantages

    f

    ontracting

    escribedn

    the

    iterature.

    tarr

    1988)cau-

    tions

    hat

    imple ublic-private

    omparisons

    f ervices

    erformed

    ften

    re

    mislead-

    ing:

    Public

    nd

    private

    chools, ospitals,

    nd

    ocial ervices

    arely

    ave he ame

    kinds

    f

    tudents,atients,

    r lients....

    Any imple

    omparison

    f

    osts,ncome,

    nd

    productivity

    uts

    he ublicector

    rganizations

    t nunfair

    isadvantagepp.6-7).

    Althoughoodresultsancome romompetition,f heres not ompetitiveid-

    ding,

    hen

    t s

    argued

    hat

    private onopoly

    anbe

    worse han

    governmental

    ne

    (Kelley,

    984).

    ole

    source ontractors

    ight

    e able

    ohold

    he

    ity ostage

    o

    price

    raising,specially

    here

    major apital

    xpenditures

    re nvolved

    uch s

    where he

    city

    as

    iquidated

    ts

    efuse

    ollectionleet

    Miranda,994).

    imitation

    n he

    umber

    of

    viable

    idders

    n

    the nvironment

    n

    general

    s a

    dangerous

    ut ot ncommonb-

    struction

    o

    uccessful

    ontractingICMA,

    1989;

    Kettl, 993a;Mercer,

    983).

    A

    lim-

    ited

    ool

    of

    potential

    uppliers

    nmarkets

    empts

    idders

    o eek

    higher rices,

    nd t

    the

    ostcontract

    tage,

    t

    empts

    hem

    o

    opportunistically

    emand

    hanges

    n

    greed-

    on ontractermsecausehe ontractorannot eeasily eplacedGlobermanVining,

    1996).

    Contracting

    ut f

    function

    ight

    esult

    n ossof

    xpertise

    ndknow-howo

    he

    local

    government

    Halachmi

    Holzer, 993;

    Wisniewski,992).

    Also,

    workforce

    productivityight

    iminish

    erely

    ecause

    f

    he

    ecision o ontractut function.

    For

    xample,

    immins

    1986)

    foundhat

    ollowing

    decision

    o

    ontract,

    ffectedm-

    ployees

    eganusing

    ccrued

    eave

    for

    ob

    searches nd

    using gency

    acilities

    or

    copying

    esumes

    nd

    makingong-distance

    hone

    alls on

    ob

    searches.

    lthough

    there

    ill

    be

    few

    inancial

    onsequences

    or

    he

    urisdiction

    f

    displaced

    workersre

    absorbedy he ontractorrcaneasily ind ayingositionsnthe ocality,f hese

    conditions

    o

    not

    revail,

    hen here

    might

    e

    economic

    epercussions

    uch

    s

    public

    assistancexpenditures

    nd eduction

    f

    otal

    pending

    ower

    n he

    ommunityPra-

    ger

    &

    Desai,

    1996).

    Government

    ontrolver

    uality

    nddistribution

    f

    utputs ight

    be

    eopardized

    s well

    Ferris

    Graddy,986;

    Miranda, 994).

    This content downloaded from 210.187.26.2 on Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:28:50 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 8/17/2019 Local Government Contracting Service

    6/25

    Siegel

    /

    LOCAL GOVERNMENT

    SERVICE

    CONTRACTING

    369

    Local urisdictions

    ometimes

    ttempt

    o

    vade

    ccountabilityy

    ontracting.el-

    ley 1984)

    argues

    hat ltimate

    esponsibility

    annot e

    removed.

    ttemptedvasion

    of esponsibility,owever,as he ffectfdiminishingitizenccessby emovinge-

    cisions rom

    he

    public

    ealm

    where

    pen

    discussion

    reates

    pportunitiesor

    riti-

    cism

    nd

    mutual

    ersuasion

    Starr, 987).

    Once ervice

    rovision,

    s

    policymaking,

    s

    separated

    rom

    roduction

    ycontract,

    ome

    policymay

    be

    determined

    y

    the

    pro-

    vider ather

    han

    y

    the

    ontractingovernment

    fficial

    Brudney,

    987).Contract

    price ften oes

    not

    ake nto ccount he ostof

    monitoring

    he

    ontract

    Miranda,

    1994).

    Local

    governments

    o not o a

    goodjob

    f

    providingversight

    f

    ontractorsn

    any

    ase

    Dilger,Moffett,

    Struyk,997;Donahue,

    989;

    Kettl, 993a;

    Miranda

    Andersen,994;

    Savas, 1987).

    Contracting ay esultn a lesseningfpublicwill ndwelfareonsiderationss

    emphasis

    s

    placed

    n

    the

    ntegrity

    f

    he ontractnstead f

    on

    public

    ccountability

    (Bailey,

    987;

    Halachmi

    Holzer, 993).

    As

    examples,

    he

    ffectsf

    ontracting

    ay

    be

    especially eavy

    n

    minority

    mployment

    ecause

    f

    minorities'

    eliance n

    public

    jobs

    (Kohn,1986;

    Starr, 987;

    Suggs,

    1986);

    contractors

    ight

    end

    o

    service

    nly

    easy

    and

    profitable

    ustomers

    creaming )

    hile he

    unprofitable

    nd

    difficulto

    serve re

    neglectedBarnekov

    Raffel,

    990);

    and

    private

    ector

    roviders

    ight

    promote

    nequities

    n

    distributionuch s

    denying

    ervices o

    thosewho

    cannot

    ay

    (Miranda,

    994). Furthermore,

    f

    distributional

    oals

    are

    mportant

    e.g.,

    targeting

    benefits

    o

    minority

    r ow-income

    roups),

    hen

    ontract

    pecification

    ftens

    diffi-

    cult

    Ferris

    Graddy,986).

    Contracting

    ut lso creates isks

    Kettl, 993b)

    o the

    ntegrity

    f

    public

    ervice

    delivery;

    ome of these

    re

    corruption

    otentialAmerican

    ederation

    f

    State,

    County,

    nd

    Municipal

    mployees, 987),

    onflicts

    f

    nterest,

    ervice

    isruptiono-

    tential hen ontractorso

    not

    erform

    ell,

    reation

    f

    nflexibility

    nd

    management

    problems

    e.g.,

    nability

    f

    refuse ollectors

    o convert

    quipment

    o

    snowplowing),

    loss of

    mportant

    ources

    f

    nformation

    y

    government,

    nd

    data

    haring

    hat

    might

    give

    n

    advantage

    o

    some

    participants

    ver

    thers

    Halachmi

    Holzer, 993).

    The

    Contracting

    rocess

    DEFINING

    ERVICES

    TO

    BE

    CONTRACTED

    Donahue

    1989)

    describeshe est

    andidate unctionss those or

    which

    here

    re

    clear

    objectives

    ndthe

    ervices re

    tangible

    ndcan

    be

    easily pecified,

    easured,

    and

    monitored.

    rager1994)

    argues

    hat o

    uccessfully

    ontract,

    he

    ublicurisdic-

    tion

    hould e

    able to take

    dvantage

    f

    conomies

    f

    cale

    and

    cope

    of

    work

    when

    contractors

    annot.

    ervices

    hat an

    be

    provided

    hrough

    ompetitiverrangements

    canyield he enefitsf dualyardstickogauge ervicetrengthndweaknessSavas,

    1977a,

    1977b, 981).

    f he

    municipality

    ompetes

    ith

    ontractors,

    hent

    retains

    a-

    pacity

    nd

    xpertise

    n

    he

    unction

    nd llows he

    urisdiction

    o

    ntervenef

    contrac-

    torfails o meet

    equirementsFerris

    &

    Graddy,

    986;

    Halachmi&

    Holzer,

    1993;

    Hatry, 983; Savas,

    1981, 1987). Competitive

    ervice

    rrangements

    ased

    on

    geo-

    graphical

    reashave

    been

    uccessful

    Osborne

    Gaebler,

    992).

    This content downloaded from 210.187.26.2 on Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:28:50 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 8/17/2019 Local Government Contracting Service

    7/25

  • 8/17/2019 Local Government Contracting Service

    8/25

    Siegel LOCALGOVERNMENTERVICE ONTRACTING 371

    Table . ProgramsndPolicies oMinimizeotentialisplacementffects

    Internalrograms

    nd

    rocedures

    *Jobnrichment,ithay ncreases,orhose orkersho emain

    *

    mplementwo-tieredalarychemes,iringart-timeorkerst lower ate ohandleome f

    theworkhats tobecontracted

    *

    Transfer

    mployees

    o ther

    overnmentobs

    *

    Preferentialreatment

    n

    hiring

    ithin

    ublicgencies

    *

    Retain isplacedorkersnd ransferhemo therositions/departments

    *

    Establishlacementrogramso dentifynd ecureobs

    within

    ublicgencies

    *

    Extendetirement

    ndhealthenefits

    overage

    or

    isplaced

    orkers

    *

    Offerarlyetirement

    nd/or

    pecial

    everance

    ay ackagesodisplacedorkers

    Selective/strategicse

    f

    privateerviceelivery

    *Privatizenly ew r xpandedervices

    *

    Matchhe ate fprivatizationo he

    ate

    f

    normal

    ttrition

    *

    nstitute

    freeze

    n

    xternal

    iring

    nd bsorb

    isplaced

    orkers

    Private

    ectorontract

    pecifications

    *

    Require

    ontractorso fferirst

    ight

    f

    efusal

    o

    displaced

    orkers

    *

    Require

    ontractorso

    upholdqual mploymentpportunity/affirmative

    ction

    olicies

    *

    Requireontractors

    ohire

    isplaced

    orkersith

    age

    nd enefit

    ackagesomparableo hose

    in he

    ublic

    ector

    (see

    also Ferris

    Graddy, 986;Fisk,Kiesling, Muller, 978;Meyer

    &

    Morgan,

    1979; Savas, 1987).

    ESTABLISH

    PERFORMANCE STANDARDS

    Two of

    Hatry'smportantriteria,uality

    nd

    effectiveness,

    an be

    implemented

    througherformance

    tandards.

    deally, esign

    fmeasuresre

    preceded y nalyzing

    goalsderiving

    romtatutes

    nd

    historic

    ractices,iscussing

    esired

    utputs

    ndout-

    comes

    with

    major

    ustomers

    n and

    out

    of

    government,riting strategiclan,

    nd

    drawing

    n

    nput-outputap

    of

    the

    rganization.

    ut

    minimum

    equirement

    nce

    tasks avebeen dentifiedstoobtaingreementetweenolicymakingnd perating

    levels ndperhaps

    ther

    takeholders,

    uch s

    citizens,

    n

    appropriatendicatorsf

    program

    nd

    performanceHakes,1997,p. 10).

    As

    pointed

    ut

    by

    Parks

    1984),

    citi-

    zens often ave

    ubjective

    deas aboutwhat

    s

    high erformance.

    Indicatorsuch s clearance

    ates, ropertyecoveryates,

    ndcrime ates re n-

    dicative

    f a

    portion

    f what itizens

    ope

    heir

    olice ccomplish

    ut reacknowl-

    edged

    oreflect

    nly

    small

    ortion

    f

    he

    olice

    ask. itizens

    may mploy

    dditional

    indicators

    uch

    s

    rapidity

    f

    response

    o ervice

    equests

    s well s

    demeanornd c-

    tions

    t crime cenes

    Parks, 984,p. 119).

    Usually,

    everalndicatorsre

    required.

    rofessionalnd rade ssociationsome-

    times

    ave

    developed

    tandards

    hat

    may

    be

    helpful uides.

    he

    Governmentalc-

    counting

    tandards

    oardhas

    published

    number

    f

    service fforts

    nd

    ccomplish-

    ments

    tandards

    or ifferentocal

    government

    unctions

    Burnsby Herhold, 990;

    Carpenter, uchola,

    &

    Waller, 992;

    Drebin&

    Bannon, 992; Hatry Fountain,

    1989;Hatry,ountain,ullivan, Kremer,990;Parry,harp, reeland, Wallace,

    This content downloaded from 210.187.26.2 on Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:28:50 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 8/17/2019 Local Government Contracting Service

    9/25

    372

    PPMR

    March

    999

    1982;

    Rubin,

    991;

    Wallace,

    990).

    Hatry

    nd

    hiscolleagues

    ublished

    number

    f

    documents

    arlier

    hrough

    heUrban

    nstitute

    see,

    for

    xample,

    atry

    t

    al.,

    1977).

    Standardsillbe usefulnpreparingequests

    or roposals

    nd

    ontract

    erformance

    specifications,

    nd hey

    ill

    be anessential

    asis

    of

    performance

    onitoring.

    PERFORMANCE

    MONITORING

    AND REPORTING

    SYSTEMS

    Thepurpose

    fperformance

    onitoring

    s to

    provide

    nformation

    n service

    ual-

    ity

    ndprogram

    esultsWholey

    Hatry,

    992).

    Usually,

    here

    s no attempt

    o

    esti-

    mate

    he

    xtent

    o

    whichhe

    program

    aused

    bserved utcomesWholey

    Hatry,

    1992).

    Outcomes

    ayndicate

    o hemanager

    hat

    he

    ituation

    hould

    e

    examined

    o

    determine

    ppropriate

    ctions.

    erformance

    onitoring

    ystems

    hould

    e used

    to

    compareurrenterformanceoprior erformancer ocomparectual esultso ar-

    geted

    erformance

    evels.

    Rehfuss

    1989,

    p.

    91) developed

    list

    f

    monitoring

    ypes.

    Reports

    an

    be checked

    or ccuracy

    nd eviewed

    or imeliness

    s

    well

    s the

    egree

    to

    which

    ontract

    equirements

    re

    being

    met.

    cheduled

    nd

    nscheduled

    eriodic

    n-

    spections

    an

    be made.

    Harvey

    1992)

    adds

    hat

    uch

    nspections

    an

    bemade

    spe-

    cially

    f

    ervice

    elivery

    s t s

    happening.

    itizen

    omplaints

    nd heir

    esolution

    an

    be

    reviewed.

    urveys

    an

    be used

    o

    review

    verall

    itizen

    atisfaction.inally,

    er-

    formance

    tandards

    re

    pplied

    o

    data

    gathered

    s

    described y

    Wholey

    nd

    Hatry

    (1992).

    Asidefromeficienciesn nitial valuationf ervice eliverylternatives,ost

    local governments

    o

    not

    do a

    good

    ob

    of

    monitoring

    nd analyzing

    or ossible

    change

    n

    service elivery

    r

    delivery

    odes.

    Miranda

    ndAndersen's

    992

    CMA

    surveyMiranda

    Andersen,

    994)

    revealed

    hatmore

    han alf

    freporting

    ities

    and

    ounties

    o

    not

    valuate

    ervice elivery

    t ll.When

    erviceelivery

    s

    evaluated,

    cost

    nd

    ompliance

    ith

    elivery

    tandards

    re hemost

    mportant

    actors

    ddressed.

    More

    han

    alf

    f he

    ocal

    urisdictions

    valuate

    itizenatisfaction.

    iranda

    nd

    An-

    dersen

    1994)

    tated

    hat

    nalysis

    f

    data/records

    nd

    ield

    bservations

    ere

    widely

    cited y

    n

    undisclosed

    umber

    f

    governments

    p.

    34).

    A more ecenturvey

    Dilger

    et l.,1997)ofAmerica'sargestities howedhat ew idnotmonitor,ithmost e-

    viewing

    ustomeromplaints

    nd

    formal

    nspection

    esults.

    Evaluative

    esearch

    Evaluative

    esearch

    tudies

    f

    ontracting

    ervices

    n ocal

    governments

    re

    atego-

    rized

    y

    general

    ield nd

    ummarized

    n he

    Appendix.

    t hould e

    notedhat

    indings

    from

    his

    esearch

    re ontroversial,

    ven

    deologically

    o.

    For

    xample,

    nereviewer

    of

    his rticle

    eferred

    o

    he

    mpressive

    ains

    eported

    or

    ontractingy

    hese

    tudies

    as

    overblown

    nd

    unsubstantiated

    nd

    just

    iased

    baloney

    rom

    eople

    deologi-

    cally

    disposed

    o tout

    rivatization.

    Thefollowing

    re

    ome

    generalizations

    istilled

    rom

    hese tudies

    ncluding

    he

    general

    ields

    nwhich

    hey

    re

    isted

    n-the

    ppendix.

    ost

    f hese

    re

    not

    epetitive

    of

    he

    wisdom

    ecapitulated

    n

    previous

    ections.

    itations

    rom

    he

    Appendix

    re

    not

    repeated

    ndmay

    be

    referredounder

    he

    ubjects

    n

    parentheses.

    This content downloaded from 210.187.26.2 on Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:28:50 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 8/17/2019 Local Government Contracting Service

    10/25

    Siegel

    /

    LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICE CONTRACTING 373

    *

    In some evenue-producingnterprises,overnmentsre

    o

    subject oeconomicnterest

    group ressures

    hat

    ow

    pricing

    f

    ervices nd

    nability

    o

    financemprovementsrom

    operatingevenues esult

    airports,ransit).

    * Governmentsrequentlyonfronthe ilemma fpoliticalhoice etween nacceptabil-

    ity fcontractorervice

    uality

    nd

    nability

    o afford

    igh-qualityn-house ervices n

    these

    ields

    day

    care,

    human

    ervices).

    *

    Becauseof he otential

    or

    olitical

    nfluence

    hat an ead

    todefeat f

    purpose,tproba-

    bly s

    betteror

    rivate

    ector ontractors

    o

    perform

    ome ervices

    debt ollection, os-

    pitals, ransit).

    *

    The poor uality

    f

    precontracting

    esearch

    ygovernmentsitiates heworth f deci-

    sions n

    contractingeducation,

    uman

    ervices,multipleervices).

    *

    Competition,egardless

    f

    he conomicector f he ervice

    rovider,

    s

    a

    major

    actor

    inreducing

    nd

    ontrolling

    osts f ervices. he

    nverse,

    ackof

    competition,

    esults

    n

    inefficiencyndhigh osts electricervices,olidwaste ollection).

    *

    Capital-intensive

    ervices

    end o

    be more

    xpensive

    n

    government

    han n

    the

    private

    sector or

    variety

    f reasons

    electric ervices, ousing onstruction,ublicworks,

    wastewater

    reatment,ater upply, ransit).

    *

    Governments

    eed

    o

    onsider

    mploying

    he

    ractices

    f

    many ontractors,

    hich

    make

    contractervices

    ess

    costly

    ndmore

    fficient,

    s alternativeso

    contracting.onfront-

    ing

    n-house

    estednterests

    nthese

    measures

    hould e

    no

    more

    ifficulthan

    he eci-

    sion o ontract

    fire

    rotection,ultipleervices,ducation,

    olidwaste

    ollection,ub-

    lic

    works).

    *

    Contracting

    illnot

    mprove

    ervice

    elivery

    hen

    heres

    unwillingness

    f

    government

    to pay

    for lientswho

    re

    difficult

    o serve

    human ervices).

    * Contractingannot e cost-effectivehen heresa limitedoolofpotentialuppliers,

    when oals and standards

    re difficulto

    define,

    nd/or

    hen

    echnologies

    reuncer-

    tain.

    he nverse f

    his

    eads o

    uccessful

    ontractinghuman ervices,janitorial

    erv-

    ices,motor

    ehicle

    maintenance,ayroll

    nddata

    processing,ublicworks,

    olid

    waste

    collection).

    *

    There

    s

    evidence hat

    overnment

    ervice

    erformance

    as

    notbeen

    mproved y

    con-

    tractinghuman

    ervices, ropertyssessment).

    *

    Among

    he

    ractices

    f ontractorshat esult

    n

    monetaryavings

    ver

    n-house

    roduc-

    tion

    f

    ervicess that f

    paying

    ower

    ompensation

    nd

    providing

    ess

    generous

    ene-

    fits.

    Negative

    xternalities

    ay

    esult uch s

    unemployment,

    elfare

    ependency,

    nd

    reduction

    n

    iving

    tandardsf ow-income

    ersonsmultipleervices,

    motor

    ehicle

    maintenance,ublicworks, ransit).

    Conclusions:essons earned rom

    Contracting

    It

    is clear

    that

    he

    ncidence

    of

    contracting

    s

    increasing

    n

    local

    governments nd

    that ocal

    officials

    enerally

    re satisfiedwith

    doing

    t.

    Most

    of

    their

    oals

    in

    contract-

    ing apparently

    re

    being

    realized.

    However,

    there

    s

    a

    nagging

    concern

    expressed

    about

    contractors

    ho

    do

    not

    perform

    s

    expected

    or are otherwise

    ot

    up

    to

    standards.

    One source

    of

    this

    disappointment

    eems to result rom

    nadequateprecontracting

    e-

    search ndefiningndcostingwork nd ndeveloping he ontrol ystem rior o seek-

    ing

    bids

    from

    otential

    ontractors.

    recontracting

    ork an include a number

    f ac-

    tivities, erhapsbeginning

    with

    mprovement

    f n-house

    dministrative

    nd

    delivery

    systems.

    Administrative

    ystems

    uch as

    thosefor

    ost

    accounting, llocating

    nterde-

    partmental

    ervice

    charges,

    nd

    development

    f service

    efforts

    nd

    accomplishments

    standards

    will

    greatly

    facilitate

    management

    f both

    contracted nd

    noncontracted

    This content downloaded from 210.187.26.2 on Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:28:50 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 8/17/2019 Local Government Contracting Service

    11/25

    374 PPMR March

    999

    services.

    ven

    fthe

    ervice

    s

    to

    be

    contracted,

    ationalizingts mprovement

    ill

    clarify

    he rocess.

    Justbout ny ervice anbecontracted,ut ogically,ome rebetterandidates

    than

    thers.

    he conventional

    isdom tates hatwinnersre

    ikely

    o be those erv-

    ices with

    lear bjectives

    or he

    rovision

    f

    angible

    ervices

    hat

    an be measured

    and

    monitored.

    n

    fact,

    he esearch

    vidence eviewedemonstrateshat ontracting

    improvesfficiency,

    mproves

    ffectiveness,r

    resultsncost avings

    nthe ields

    f

    debt ollection,

    lectric

    ervices,

    ire

    rotection,

    ousing

    onstruction,arks,ayroll

    and

    data

    processing,

    ublicworks,

    ecreation,

    olidwaste ollection,ransit, aste-

    water reatment,

    ater

    upply,

    ndmultipleervices.

    ontracting

    asbeen esseffec-

    tive

    r

    neffective

    n the ields fhuman ervices

    nd

    property

    ssessment.

    Competition

    nd

    voidance

    f ole ource

    ontracting

    ppear

    obe

    underlying

    un-

    damentals

    f

    uccessful

    ontracting.

    he ector f

    uppliers

    rwhether

    ompetition

    s

    provided

    y

    he

    n-house

    orkforces not

    articularly

    elevant.ontractingor ighly

    complex asks

    or

    which here

    s a

    paucity

    f

    ualified

    iddersometimesanbe

    facili-

    tated

    y

    breaking

    own

    process

    nto ubsets

    orwhich

    eparate

    ontractors

    ay

    e

    found.

    What s

    t

    hat

    makes contractor

    uccessful?an

    themethodsr

    ystems

    e

    cop-

    ied,perhaps

    ven

    precluding

    heneed o contract?

    he success fthese

    ontractors

    might

    tem

    romttributes

    uch

    s levels f abor orce

    ompensation,

    se of

    apital-

    intensiverocesses,

    nd

    greater

    uthority

    nd

    responsibility

    f

    upervisors.

    opying

    thesemethods ightequireonsortingith therrganizations,ublic rprivate,o

    be able

    to

    mimic ontractor

    ize,

    apitalization,

    ndfreedomf ction

    oachieve he

    benefits.

    n

    any

    ase,

    f he

    urisdiction

    s confronted

    ith he ituation

    f

    having

    o

    contract

    ith

    nly

    ne

    upplier,

    hen he lternatives

    f

    duplicating

    ontractor

    ttrib-

    utes nd

    oining

    onsortia

    ecome ealistic.

    Finally,

    n

    he ategory

    f

    general

    isdombout

    ow odo

    contracting

    uccessfully

    are he

    ollowing

    deas:

    *

    The

    cost

    ofcontract onitoring

    nd

    upervision

    requently

    s overlooked.

    t

    should e

    added ocontractorroposals.

    *

    Survey

    esearch

    ndicates

    hat

    mosturisdictions

    o notmonitor

    ontractors

    xtensively.

    *

    Attention

    hould e

    given

    o

    the

    esign

    f

    optimal

    monitoringequirements.

    *

    An

    aspect

    f he ecision

    ocontract

    hould e

    alertnesso

    potential

    egative

    xternali-

    ties.

    hese

    might

    e

    mpacts

    n

    the

    ocal

    conomy,

    ther

    overnments

    r

    functions,ov-

    ernmental

    olicies,

    r ertain

    ocietal

    roups.

    lso

    n

    this

    ategory

    s

    mitigation

    f on-

    tracting

    mpacts

    n

    n

    xisting

    orkforce.

    numberf deas

    were escribed

    n

    Table

    2.

    *

    In

    planning

    o

    ontract,

    ttention

    ust e directedo

    he etentionffunctional

    xpertise

    by

    he

    ontractingovernment.

    bviously,

    he

    bility

    o

    upervise

    ontractors

    s

    very

    e-

    pendent

    n this

    xpertise.

    This content downloaded from 210.187.26.2 on Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:28:50 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 8/17/2019 Local Government Contracting Service

    12/25

    Siegel/

    LOCAL

    GOVERNMENT

    SERVICE

    CONTRACTING

    375

    Appendix

    Summary

    f

    Evaluative

    esearch

    n Local

    Government

    Service ontracting:escriptions/ConclusionsyFunctionr Subject

    Airports

    Government

    ricing

    olicies

    or anding

    ights

    ndotherirport

    ervices

    ead to

    nefficient

    congestion

    nd

    nability

    o finance

    xpansion

    f

    facilitiesRoth,

    987).

    Day

    Care

    Centers

    Private

    ay

    care

    was

    found

    o

    be

    45%

    less

    costly

    ue to fewer eachers,

    owerwages,

    nd

    fewer onteachingtaffBennett Di Lorenzo,

    983).

    Debt

    Collection

    Private

    ebt

    ollectionrocedures

    ere asternd

    0%

    esscostly han

    n-house

    overnment

    services.

    overnment

    as

    200%

    more

    ostly er

    dollar ursued

    Bennett

    Di Lorenzo,

    .983;

    Bennett

    Johnson,981).

    Education

    Students

    ttendingublic

    igh

    chools

    idnot

    erform

    s well sstudents

    nnonpublic

    pri-

    marily

    atholic)

    igh

    chools

    n

    terms f cademic chievement.esearch asbeen riticized

    fornot

    controlling

    or

    pre-high

    chool

    chievement,

    mportant

    mong

    election

    riteria

    f

    Catholic igh

    chools

    Alexander

    Pallas,

    1983;

    Coleman,

    offer,

    Kilgore,

    981;

    Levin,

    1987).

    Costs

    f

    public

    chools

    remasked

    y

    n

    accounting

    ystem

    hat mits apital

    xpenditures

    (Lieberman,

    989).

    Private

    chools

    o notnecessarily

    o a

    betterjob

    han ublic

    chools

    ecause he ole

    f

    vol-

    unteer elp

    s not ountedJames

    Levin,

    983).

    Electricervices

    In communities

    here here

    as

    competition,

    osts

    were educed y

    bout

    1

    N%,egardless

    of

    whether

    he

    ervice

    rovider

    as

    government

    r

    a

    private

    oncern

    Primeaux,

    977).

    Competition

    roduced

    ower

    ates han

    id

    regulation

    n a

    comparison

    f n-house overn-

    ment

    roduction

    ersus lectric

    tilities

    hat

    ompete

    ersus

    egulated

    rivate

    onopolies.

    ov-

    ernment

    roduction

    esulted

    n the owest

    ates ue to

    tax

    xemption

    Hellman,

    972).

    Municipal

    tilities

    hat

    ace

    ompetition

    ave

    11%

    ower osts. conomies

    f caleoffset

    -

    efficiency

    t

    big

    firms

    Primeaux,

    975,

    ited

    n

    Hilke,

    992).

    Comparisons

    f

    Texas nd

    California

    ublic

    municipal

    nd

    private

    lectric

    tilities

    howed

    private

    irms,

    djusted

    or

    cale,

    o

    be as efficient

    r

    more

    fficient

    n

    operating

    osts

    nd nvest-

    ment

    han n-house

    municipal

    roducers

    Spann,

    977).

    Municipal

    tility

    lectric

    enerating

    osts

    were ound

    o

    be

    40%

    to75%

    higher,

    nd

    nvest-

    ment osts

    were ound

    o

    be

    40%

    higher

    er

    ilowatt

    our,

    han

    hose

    f

    private

    irms

    Wallace

    &

    Junck,

    970).

    This content downloaded from 210.187.26.2 on Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:28:50 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 8/17/2019 Local Government Contracting Service

    13/25

    376

    PPMRMarch

    999

    FireProtection

    The ost f ire ervice

    rovision

    er ouseholdnScottsdale,

    rizona, yRural/Metro

    on-

    tract ire rotectionervicewas bout nehalf hat or quivalentrotectionnthe hreeities

    served ygovernment

    ire

    epartments.

    herewas

    no

    ignificant

    ifferencenquality

    Institute

    ofLocalSelf-Government,

    977, ited

    n Poole

    &

    Fixler,

    987).

    A

    private

    irm

    rovided

    ire

    rotection

    ervicest 65% lower

    osts han ida government

    service

    n

    a Denmarktudy.

    ifferencesncostswere ue

    to

    economies

    fscale, ower

    nput

    costs,

    nd

    specially

    se

    of

    part-time

    eservistsnd ower -efficienciesKristensen,

    983).

    Switching

    rom

    municipal

    o

    private

    ontract

    ire

    rotection

    educed osts

    y20%

    to 50%

    (Poole,1976;

    Smith, 983;

    both ited

    n

    Hilke,

    992).

    In

    a

    comparisonf

    Seattle,

    Washington,n-house

    municipalire ervice

    with cottsdale,

    Arizona,

    ontractervices,

    he

    municipal

    epartment

    as found obe 39% to 88% highern

    costs er apitaAhlbrandt,973,1974;Moore, 988).

    Hospitals

    No

    evidence

    as

    found hat

    ontractingut

    hemanagementf

    public ospitals

    n number

    ofCalifornia

    ounties

    ad chieved

    ost

    avings.

    owever,twas found

    hat he rivate

    irms

    were

    etterhan overnmental

    anagement

    t securingevenuesShonick

    Roemer,983,

    cited

    n

    Hatry,

    988).

    Housing

    In-houseity

    onstruction

    ostswere ound

    obe

    20%

    more ostly er onstantuality

    ous-

    ing

    unit han

    rivate

    irmsn U.S.

    cities

    Muth,

    973,

    ited n

    Hilke, 992).

    Human Services

    A

    studyf

    llprivatizedhild

    are

    ervicesnNorth arolina

    oundhat osts ecreasedfter

    privatization;

    n

    average,

    ervice

    uality

    uffered,

    s

    evidenced

    y

    ower taff

    er

    hild

    atios,

    largerroups,

    arger enters,

    ess

    equipment,

    nd

    ower

    aregiver

    alaries.

    uality

    aried e-

    tween

    or-profit

    nd

    nonprofitroviders.

    onprofits

    ad creamed

    ffhe east

    xpensive

    li-

    ents ndeventuallyervedmore ffluentlients,esultingn ower peratingostsper hild

    (Kamerman

    Kahn, 989).

    A national

    eview

    f

    privatization

    n four ocial

    ervices-mental

    ealth,ong-term

    are,

    youth

    mployment

    nd

    raining,

    nd hildwelfare-concluded

    hat here

    s

    ittle

    upport

    or

    he

    conclusion

    hat

    ontracting

    educes osts.

    roblems

    oundnclude

    ominance

    f

    field

    y

    few

    large

    endors,overnment

    upport

    or

    nlyow-quality

    ervices,

    nd ack

    of

    upport

    or hose

    most xpensive

    o

    serve

    Gurin,

    989).

    An

    attempt

    y

    southern

    lorida o

    privatize

    tsmental ealth

    ervices

    uring

    992-1993

    failed ue to

    employeepposition

    ndfaltered

    ainly

    n

    potential

    oss of

    a

    generous

    enefit

    package y

    employees

    o be transferred

    o

    private

    endors

    Becker,

    ilverstein,

    Chaykin,

    1995).

    Contracting

    f ubstance

    buse

    rograms

    y

    North arolina

    ounties

    idnot esult

    n

    com-

    petitiony

    vendors

    ue

    to

    underfunding

    nd

    understaffing

    fthe

    ublic urchasing

    unction,

    which esulted

    n

    reliance

    n

    trust

    nd

    ong-standing

    elationships

    etween

    urchasing

    fficials

    and

    private

    ervice

    gencies

    n

    makingontracting

    ecisions

    Smith

    Sayth, 996).

    This content downloaded from 210.187.26.2 on Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:28:50 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 8/17/2019 Local Government Contracting Service

    14/25

    Siegel/

    LOCAL

    GOVERNMENT SERVICE CONTRACTING 377

    Attemptedrivatization

    f mental ealth

    ervices

    y

    a

    state

    overnmentegeneratednto

    complex egotiations

    etween

    he tate

    nd

    private onopolies,ltimatelyesulting

    n

    higher

    costs nd ower

    uality

    f ervices

    Schlesinger,orwart, Pulice, 986).

    These

    ervices ften

    are

    performedy

    ocal

    governments,

    ence he elevance f his

    tate ase.

    A case

    study

    f

    Dane

    County,Wisconsin,

    evealed

    nadequacies

    f

    countymanagementf

    its

    ontracted-out

    uman ervices

    rogram

    ue o ow

    ompetitionmong ontractors,ifficulty

    in

    definingoals

    because f

    mpreciseness

    fdesired

    utcomes

    nd

    uncertaintyf echnologies,

    difficulty

    n

    monitoringerformance

    ecause f

    nadequate oaldefinition;nadequateutoma-

    tion

    ervices,

    nd

    poor ccountability

    ecause ontractorsere ble

    to nfluenceolitical ffi-

    cials

    Kettl, 993a).

    Privatelyupplied rogramsperatingnder ompetitiveidding aved20% to ess than

    60%

    over

    n-house

    upplied

    welfareervices

    Stevens, 984b).

    In-house ersus ompetitivelyontractedrivateervices or ocational ehabilitation,hild

    protectiveervices,

    nd

    programs

    or he

    lderly

    ften evolvednto

    ingle-sourceontracting,

    with ittle vidence

    f

    efficiencyains.Nonprofit

    irms

    repredominantuppliers.mproved

    programharacteristics

    ere he

    rimarybjectives

    or

    ontracting,

    utno

    quantifiableuality

    information

    s available

    Hatry, 983;Wedel,Katz,

    &

    Weick, 980)

    Greater

    pecificity

    n

    human ervice

    rogramequirementsmplied

    more

    ontracting

    ut

    (Chackerian Imershein,984).

    Janitorial

    ervices

    Contract

    anitorial

    ervices ad

    42%

    lower

    osts,

    ven fter

    ccounting

    or

    uality,ervice

    levels,

    ndeconomies f scale

    Stevens, 984a,1984b).

    MotorVehicle

    Maintenance

    Contractor

    osts

    were1%

    to 38% below n-house

    municipal

    osts or

    quivalent

    r

    higher

    levels

    f ervice.

    Wage

    evelswere

    imilar,

    ut henumbers

    f

    operating

    ndoverhead

    mploy-

    ees

    were

    ess due to

    greater roductivityCampbell, 988).

    Multiple

    ervices

    Eightmunicipalervices f various itiesnmetropolitanos Angeleswere omparedn

    private

    ersus

    ublic

    ervice

    elivery

    riteriaf

    fficiency

    nd

    ffectiveness.n

    average, ith

    service

    evel, cale,

    ndenvironmental

    onditions

    eld

    onstant, unicipal

    ervices

    rovided

    weremore

    ostly

    han

    hose

    rovided

    nder ontract. o

    significant

    ifference

    merged

    hen

    service ffectiveness

    as examined.

    ifferences

    ere

    ccounted

    or

    mong

    ontractors

    ho

    tended

    ouse

    younger

    nd

    ess

    tenured

    orkers,

    horeceivedhorteracation

    eaves,

    nd

    who

    had ower bsentee

    ates.

    ontractors

    ere ess abor ntensivend

    had

    more irect

    ontrol

    ver

    labor

    force nd

    equipmentBerenyi

    &

    Stevens, 988).

    This researchwas criticized

    y

    Wisniewski

    1992)

    because

    egression

    esults

    ndicatedhat

    nvironmental

    onditions ere ot

    examined or

    efuse

    ollection.

    AsurveyfNorth arolinaounties evealed hatconomic nd perationalssues redomi-

    nated

    mong

    easons

    iven

    or

    ontractingi.e.,

    hat

    ontracting

    ould esult

    n

    cost

    avings,

    he

    provision

    f

    special quipment

    nd skilled

    ersonnel,

    ndthe

    pportunity

    o

    mprove

    ervice

    quality)

    ut hat

    olicy uestions elating

    o

    ccountability

    ater ecame

    mportant

    s

    experience

    with

    he ontractor

    as

    gained.

    ther

    actors

    uch s

    monitoring

    ifficultiesnd

    ontractoreli-

    ability roblems

    lso

    ensued

    Cigler, 990).

    This content downloaded from 210.187.26.2 on Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:28:50 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 8/17/2019 Local Government Contracting Service

    15/25

    378 PPMR

    March 999

    Basedon n nalysis f

    1982 nd1984

    CMA data, ontractinguthad statistically

    ignifi-

    cant

    nd

    negativempact

    n

    spending

    n

    both ears.

    10% ncreasencontractingedto

    4%

    decrease

    n

    expenditures.

    he same

    was

    found or

    ercentagef functionsontracted.

    hese

    findings eremoreikely o occur ncouncil-managerities han nmayor-councilystems

    (Miranda, 994;Stein,

    990).

    Based

    ona

    sample f500 U.S. cities rom

    CMA data, twasconcludedhat s external

    ro-

    duction

    s usedmore

    xtensively,ity xpenditures

    nd

    mployment

    ecrease. owever, ega-

    tive

    ontracting

    lasticities

    uggest

    hat

    merely

    ncreasinghe se of

    xternalroductionsnot

    likely, n average,

    oresolve

    city's

    inancial

    ifficultiesFerris,

    988).

    A

    survey

    f100

    f

    America'smost

    opulous

    ities

    evealedhat

    mostwere

    atisfied ith ri-

    vatization;

    hat

    rivatization

    as carried

    ut

    mainly

    o

    reduce osts nd

    mproveervice;

    nd

    that ost

    avings

    ere stimatedobe more han

    0%

    n

    public

    works/transportation,

    ore

    han

    16% n

    public afety,

    ore han 7%

    n

    healthndhuman

    ervices,

    ore han

    6%

    n

    parksnd

    recreation,ndmore han 6% nsupportunctions. ost espondentshoughthatity om-

    pensation

    as somewhatetter

    r

    considerably

    etter.

    ostusedmore

    han

    ne

    technique

    o

    monitor

    ontractors-mostly

    ustomer

    omplaints

    nd

    nspections.

    mong

    essons

    earned

    from

    ontracting

    ere heneed omake ertainhat

    ity equests

    or

    roposals

    ere

    horough

    and asily nderstood,concern

    hetherow

    biddersre

    ctuallyapable

    f

    performingo tan-

    dards,

    nd

    he

    eed

    or

    ffectivevaluation

    nd

    monitoring

    f

    ontractors

    Dilger

    t

    l.,1997).

    A 1979

    urvey

    f ocalofficialshowed hat

    2% felt hat

    uality

    f ervices

    ontractedut

    was favorable

    Osborne Gaebler, 992, .

    89).

    A

    survey

    howed he

    ollowingdvantages

    o

    ontractingin

    descendingrder fpercentage

    of

    response):

    ost

    avings,

    haringisk, igherualityervice,

    roviding

    ervices ot

    therwise

    available,

    horter

    mplementationime,

    nd

    solving

    ocal

    political roblemsTouche

    Ross,

    1987, . 5).

    Cost

    f ontracted

    ervices

    veraged

    0% ess

    han

    n-houseervicesn

    Los

    Angeles

    ounty

    from 979

    o

    1984

    Savas, 1987).

    Contracting

    ost was 30% less

    than

    n-house ervices

    n

    La

    Mirada,

    alifornia

    Moore,

    1987).

    A

    study

    f

    minority

    orkers

    isplaced yprivatization

    howed hat

    lthough

    orkers

    ere

    hired

    y

    ontractors

    n

    bout he

    ame

    roportion

    s

    they

    adbeen

    y

    ity epartments,

    he

    ri-

    vate

    mployers

    ffered

    ower

    wages

    nd enefitshan id he

    municipal

    genciesSuggs, 986).

    Based

    on an

    analysis

    f 1982 CMA

    surveyata,

    t

    was found

    hat ervice ata

    weremore

    successful

    t

    explaining

    ector

    hoice n

    contractingprivate,ublic,

    r

    nonprofit)

    han

    was a

    producer

    hoicemodel. he

    service-specific

    odel ncluded

    abor

    ntensity,

    cale

    economies,

    need

    for

    tandardization,egree

    f

    collectiveness,onstituencyreference

    or

    onprofitro-

    duction

    nhealthndhuman

    ervices,

    nd

    he

    reexistence

    f

    nonprofit

    roducers.

    he

    producer

    choicemodel

    was

    posited

    s both

    he

    egree

    owhich ontrol ust e

    relinquished

    o

    chieve

    f-

    ficiencyains

    nd he

    willingness

    f

    he

    ocal

    government

    o onsiderhis rade-off

    smaller

    nd

    largerommunities,

    ommunities

    ith

    ost-reducingncentives,ealthy

    nd

    poor

    ommuni-

    ties,

    nd

    hosewithow

    proportions

    f nionized

    ublic mployees)Ferris Graddy,986).

    More

    han

    0 studies

    ere

    urveyed

    hat xamined

    he

    ost

    ffectiveness

    f

    private roduc-

    tion

    f

    public

    ervices. total

    f 19

    differentervices

    ere xamined

    ncludingtilities,

    efuse

    collection, ospitals,

    nd

    housing.

    fthese

    tudies,

    0

    found

    rivate

    roduction

    o

    be

    cheaper

    than

    ublic roduction,

    found

    ublic roduction

    obe

    cheaper,

    nd found o

    significant

    if-

    ference.

    twas

    noted

    hat

    ost ifferences

    iminish

    s

    competition

    n

    he

    ublic

    ervicencreases

    (Borcherding,

    ommerehne,Schneider,982).

    This content downloaded from 210.187.26.2 on Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:28:50 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 8/17/2019 Local Government Contracting Service

    16/25

    SiegelLOCALGOVERNMENT

    ERVICE ONTRACTING 379

    Parks

    Contract

    erviceor

    ark

    urf aintenance

    as28% owerncost nd

    quivalent

    n

    quality

    n

    comparison ithn-house ervice Stevens, 984b).

    Payroll nd

    Data

    Processing

    In comparison

    ith n-house ervice, ompetitivelyelected

    ontractorserformedigher

    quality

    ata

    processing

    ervice

    with ost

    avings

    f

    15%

    Valente

    Manchester,

    984).

    No costdifferences

    ere ound fterccounting

    or

    uality

    nd

    other actors

    etweenn-

    house ervice

    nd

    private

    ontractors

    Stevens, 984b).

    Property ssessment

    Private

    gency

    ssessments

    rovided

    0% cost

    avings

    nd

    were

    ound

    o

    be more ccurate

    (Stocker, 973).

    Following

    court ecision

    nMassachusetts

    hat

    equired

    ll

    property

    o

    be reappraised

    ou-

    tinely,

    most ommunities

    omplied

    hrough

    ontractors.

    fter

    ontrolling

    or

    differencesn

    populations,

    twas found hat owns

    hat

    erformed

    eevaluationsn-housepent 9% essthan

    towns

    hat

    ontracted

    ut.No

    data

    on

    qualitative

    ifferencesere

    presentedCarver,

    989).

    Controlling

    or everal ifferences

    n

    Michiganmunicipalities,

    t

    was found hat

    ssessment

    costs

    f

    contracting

    istricts ere essthan alf he osts f

    noncontractingistricts.owever,

    contracting

    as found

    o

    have

    negative

    mpact

    n assessment

    erformance,

    hichwas 10%

    lower han hemean evelfor ll districtsLowery, 982).

    Public

    Works

    A

    total f 10southernalifornia

    ities

    with

    ublic-providedublic

    works

    ervices nd

    10

    with

    rivate-provided

    ervices

    were

    ompared.

    ontractor

    rovision

    as found

    o be 22%

    to

    30%

    less

    expensive

    han

    ublic roduction.

    ower

    ost

    abor

    ractices

    ccounted

    or

    ontractor

    results-fewer

    acation

    nd eave

    days

    for

    quivalent ay,

    se

    of

    east

    ualified

    ersonnelble

    to

    performasks,

    se of

    part-time

    abor

    when

    ppropriate,

    anager esponsibility

    or

    vailabil-

    ity

    f

    abor nd

    equipment,

    uthorizedirst-line

    upervisors

    o hire nd

    fire,

    nd

    use of ess

    labor-intensiveroduction eansStevens, 984a,1984b).

    Contract

    ities ad43%

    lower

    treet

    leaning

    osts han

    id n-houseervices fter

    ccount-

    ing

    for

    uality

    nd

    other actors

    Stevens,984b).

    Contracting

    ut

    f

    sphalt verlay

    as

    half s

    costly

    s n-house

    roduction,

    ith

    quivalent

    quality.

    ontractorssed

    more

    xperienced

    taffnd

    more

    quipment.

    ost

    avings

    n

    traffic

    light

    maintenance

    veraged

    6% over

    n-house

    ervices

    Stevens,

    984b).

    Costs

    of

    privately

    onstructed

    ports

    renas

    veraged

    1%

    less

    than hose f

    publicly

    on-

    structed

    renas

    Savas,

    1987,

    ited n

    Hilke, 992).

    Recreation

    In

    contrast

    o n-house

    ervices,

    ontracting

    llowedmaintenance

    f

    uality

    ecreation

    erv-

    ices,

    ven

    hough

    udgets

    ere educed

    y

    s much s 50% under alifornia's

    roposition

    3

    (Fixler

    &

    Poole,

    1987).

    This content downloaded from 210.187.26.2 on Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:28:50 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 8/17/2019 Local Government Contracting Service

    17/25

    380 PPMR

    March 999

    Security

    ervices

    Private

    ecurity

    ervices

    aved 0% or

    more vern-house

    ecurityuardsHanke,

    985).

    SolidWaste olection

    Nine

    tudies onductedver

    decade

    ndicate

    hatmunicipal

    ollectionosts re

    bout 5%

    higher

    han

    hose

    f

    ontract

    ollection, ithout

    oweringf ervice

    uality,s reported

    y 0%

    ofhousehold

    urvey espondents

    Savas, 1987).

    Five ities

    sing ompetitive

    ervice

    roviderscity

    nd

    ontractors)

    ere

    valuatednmul-

    tiple

    riteria.ne

    city

    bandoned

    ontracting

    ue o

    need o

    replace quipment.

    ll

    cities

    nd

    contractors

    xperienced

    ncreases

    n

    ost

    er

    ousehold

    etween 981 nd

    1993;

    wo

    f

    four

    it-

    ies had

    ignificantly

    ower

    ncreases,

    nd

    third

    as within

    .9%

    of he

    ontractor's

    ncrease.

    On costper on, atawere navailableor necity, hereas wo f the therhree ities ad

    lower ncreasedosts nd nehaddecreased

    osts.On

    households

    er ay,

    ata

    were

    vailable

    for

    nly

    wo

    ities;

    ouseholdserved

    y ity

    orces

    ncreased

    ignificantly

    none

    ity

    nd

    hose

    served

    y

    ontractors

    ncreased

    ignificantly

    n

    another.

    ull

    datawere

    vailable

    or wo

    ities

    on

    tons er erson-day;ignificant

    ncreases ere

    hown or

    ity orces

    none

    ity

    nd

    for

    on-

    tractors

    n he ther. he

    bases

    f

    ompetition

    ere

    ot

    ntirelyqual

    due o

    differentials

    nfac-

    tors uch s

    populationensity,

    ousehold

    ize,

    errain,

    ot

    ize,

    raffic

    ongestion,

    nd

    distance

    to

    disposal

    ite.Wisniewski

    1992)

    criticized

    he

    riginal

    avas

    1981)

    study

    or

    hese

    actors

    (Ammons

    Hill,1995;

    Di

    Piazza,1986).

    Because fTeamstersnion

    esistance,

    lack

    f

    ompetitionmong

    uppliers,

    nd

    perhaps

    the ole forganizedrime,he ost avings xpected henNewYork itywitchedothe ri-

    vatization

    f

    ommercial

    efuse avenot

    materialized

    Bailey,

    987).

    The

    Minneapolis-St.

    aul,Minnesota,xperience

    ith

    rivatization

    f

    solidwaste ollec-

    tionwas

    ompared

    o hat fNorth

    ork,

    ntario. he

    benefits

    rom

    ompetition

    id

    notmateri-

    alize

    n

    North ork ver

    5-year

    eriod,

    ith

    ity

    orces

    roviding

    ervices

    hat ere

    8% ess

    expensive

    han

    ontractor-provided

    ervices

    Bureau

    f

    Municipal

    esearch, 981;McDavid,

    1985).

    Residential

    olid

    waste ollection as

    compared

    or ll

    arger anadian ities

    xcept ue-

    bec. t wasfound hat xclusive

    ublic

    ollection

    as41% more

    xpensive

    han

    rivate

    ollec-

    tion nd hatmixed

    ublic-privateystems

    ere

    .5%

    more

    xpensive

    han

    rivate

    ollection

    when roductionnd nvironmentalariables ere ontrolled.rivaterewswere 5%more

    productive

    er

    erson

    han

    ublic

    rews

    nd

    were 0%

    more

    roductive

    er

    erson

    han

    ublic

    crews

    n

    mixed

    ettings.

    ifferencesn

    salaries id

    not

    xplainfficiency

    ifferences.arious

    data

    had o

    be

    estimatedue

    toomissions

    rom

    uestionnaire

    esponsesMcDavid,

    985).

    Before nd fter ase studies or

    woCanadian

    itieswere

    resented

    or

    erformance

    e-

    tween 981 nd 1983.

    ForWest

    Vancouver,

    ritish

    olumbia,ublic

    ollection

    n

    1981was

    19% more

    xpensive

    er

    householdhan

    was

    private

    ollectionhe

    ollowing

    ear

    ndwas

    9%

    more

    xpensive

    han nit ollectionosts

    n

    1983.

    ons

    er erson

    er ay

    ncreased

    y

    1%

    be-

    tween 981

    nd

    1982

    nd

    by

    29%

    between 981 nd 1983.

    For

    Richmond,

    ritish

    olumbia,

    public

    ollection

    n 1982was

    66% more

    xpensive

    han

    rivate

    ollection

    n

    1983. rivaterews

    were 5% more roductiveer ersonn1983 han ublic rewswere nprior ear. pdatede-

    sults

    or

    987

    were imilarn

    magnitude

    McDavid, 985;

    McDavid

    &

    Schick, 987).

    A

    study

    ound o

    apparent ajor

    ifferencesetween

    ublic

    nd

    private

    osts f

    esidential

    refuseollection

    Hirsch,965,

    ited

    n

    Bennett

    Johnson,

    981).Average

    ost

    per erson

    f

    trash

    ollection

    n

    Monmouth

    ounty,

    ew

    Jersey,

    as 70%

    higher

    hen

    erviceswere

    ro-

    vided

    ygovernment

    Spann, 977).

    This content downloaded from 210.187.26.2 on Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:28:50 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 8/17/2019 Local Government Contracting Service

    18/25

    Siegel

    LOCAL

    GOVERNMENT

    ERVICE

    ONTRACTING

    381

    In

    a

    Connecticuttudy,t

    was

    oncluded

    hat

    efuse

    ollection

    osts

    ppeared o

    vary

    withhe

    type

    f

    conomic

    nvironmentnwhich

    ollection

    as

    provided.

    rivate

    ollection

    ppeared

    o

    be

    about 0% more

    xpensive

    han

    municipal

    ollection,

    hich n

    turn

    ppeared o

    be about

    25% more xpensivehan ontractollectionKemper Quigley, 976,cited nBennett

    Johnson,

    981).

    Market

    ollection f

    garbage

    was

    found

    ocost

    from 6%

    to

    48% less

    than

    ontract

    ollec-

    tion

    Stevens,

    978,

    ited

    n

    Bennett

    Johnson,

    981).

    BennettndJohnson

    1981,

    pp.

    44-45)

    attributedhe

    isparitiesn

    the

    precedingour

    ita-

    tions o differencesn

    accountingractices

    f

    municipalities.

    No

    significantost

    differences

    ere

    ound or

    rivate

    irms

    ver

    n-house

    ollectionnthe

    St.

    Louis,

    Missouri,

    rea.

    Private

    irmsost

    density

    conomies

    ecause

    everal

    irms

    ervedhe

    same reas.

    Public

    uppliers

    ad

    monopoly

    tatus

    Collins&

    Downes, 977).

    In-house

    ersus

    rivate

    monopolyranchise

    ersus

    rivate

    onfranchiseirms

    ere

    om-

    pared. ublic upplywas 40% to 60%more xpensivehan rivateupply.rivate

    monopoly

    pricewas

    only

    lightly

    5%) higher han he

    price fprivate

    onfranchise

    ollectors.

    ensity

    economies ffset

    therwise

    igher

    osts

    Edwards

    Stevens,979,

    ited

    n

    Hilke,

    992;

    Savas,

    1974,

    1977a,

    1977b,

    980;

    Stevens

    Savas,

    1978).

    Controlling

    or

    uality,

    here

    ere ost

    avings

    f22% for

    competitive

    ontract

    ersusn-

    house

    ervice

    Stevens,

    984b).

    Municipal

    uppliers

    ere

    more

    ostly

    han

    roprietary

    irms

    n

    48

    Canadian

    ities

    Kitchen,

    1976).

    Costof

    city

    ollection as

    15%

    higher

    han he

    price

    f

    private

    ontract

    ollectorsn

    mid-

    westernities

    Petrovic

    Jaffee,

    977,

    ited n

    Hilke,

    992).

    Municipaluppliers

    n

    Montana

    ppeared

    obe

    more

    fficienthan

    rivate

    irms,

    ot

    ontrol-

    lingfor

    uality

    nd

    community

    haracteristics

    Pier,

    Vernon,

    Wicks,

    974).

    No

    significant

    ost ifferences

    ere ound

    etween

    n-house

    nd

    privateirmsn

    Minneapo-

    lis,

    Minnesota,

    f

    uppliers

    ompeted

    hrough

    ight

    ontrolf

    municipal

    osts

    y

    he

    egislature,

    using rivate

    osts s a

    comparison

    Savas,

    1977a).

    In-housend

    franchise

    ontractors

    n

    single-district

    urisdiction

    ere

    ompared

    o

    ontrac-

    tors nd

    n-house ervice n a

    multidistrict

    etting.

    he

    average

    umber

    f bids

    per

    rea n-

    creased

    when

    ities re

    divided nto mall

    districts.

    ompetitive

    idding

    ed

    to ower

    osts or

    contractor

    ervice.

    ities

    hat

    ctively

    monitored

    unicipal

    gencies

    sing rivate

    ontractor

    costs ad ower

    verage

    osts.

    No benefitsere btained ithouthese oliciesSavas,1981).

    Transit

    In a

    study

    f

    595 transit

    gencies,

    t

    was

    found

    hat

    rivatelywned

    nd

    operated

    ystems

    weremore

    fficient

    nd

    generated

    ore

    evenue

    han

    ublicly

    wned nd

    perated

    ystems.ri-

    vately

    managed

    ublic

    ystems

    ere

    o more

    fficient

    r

    ffective.ne

    qualificationf

    he

    e-

    sults fthe

    tudy

    was

    that

    he

    rivate

    rganizationsere

    ubsidized

    ystems

    ocated

    redomi-

    nantly

    n the

    NewYork-New

    ersey

    rea

    Perry

    Babitsky,

    986).

    An

    nternational

    omparison

    f

    publicly

    nd

    privately

    wned

    nd

    operated

    ompanies

    ndi-

    cates hat

    rivate

    perators

    rebetween

    0%

    and 5% ess

    costly

    han

    ublic

    uses.

    Differences

    for

    New

    York

    ity

    were

    much

    maller,

    hichwas

    attributedo xtensive

    nionization

    nd

    regu-

    lation. n some

    ases,

    ost

    ccounting

    atawere

    nadequate

    ndhad

    tobe

    estimated

    Walters,

    1987).

    In

    NewYork

    tate,

    comparison

    f

    Westchester

    ounty's

    rivatelyperated

    ystem

    16

    bus

    companies)

    ith

    Nassau

    County'sublic

    us

    uthority

    ndicatedhat he

    atter

    osts 8%

    more

    than he ormer

    Savas,

    1987).

    This content downloaded from 210.187.26.2 on Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:28:50 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 8/17/2019 Local Government Contracting Service

    19/25

    382

    PPMR March

    999

    A total f

    13 studies ere ummarizedhatwere

    onductedver 20-year eriod

    n com-

    parativeerformance

    f ransitrganizational

    orms. f hese tudies,foundhat rivate

    wn-

    ership

    s

    more

    fficient

    han

    ublic wnership,

    arrived

    t

    he pposite

    onclusion,nd uncov-

    erednodifferences.hesestudies lso foundhatmunicipal overnmentsend o be more

    efficient

    han

    pecial

    uthorities.

    his s attributedo imitationsn measurement

    fmunicipal

    overhead

    osts

    atherhan oreal

    fficiency

    ifferences

    Anderson,

    983;

    Barnum Gleason,

    1979;

    Perry,984;Perry Babitsky,

    986;Pucher, 982).

    A

    total

    f

    75 chool istricts

    ere

    tudied,

    fwhich

    44

    provided

    ransportationolely

    with

    district-owneduses,

    9 used

    private

    ontractors

    xclusively,

    nd82 usedboth istrict-owned

    andcontractor-owned

    uses.Controllingor arious ifferences,

    omparisonshowed

    ublic

    ownership

    obe 12%more

    ostly

    han

    rivate

    wnership

    n the riterionfcost

    per

    mile. or

    districtshat perated

    nly ublic

    r

    privateystems,

    he ifference

    as

    10%greaterncost er

    mile or istrict-onlyperated

    ystems

    ver hat or

    rivately

    peratednes. he ame

    ost om-

    parisonsor he ublic artfjointystemsas16.5%morexpensiveortheubliclyperated

    part

    fthe oint ystemsMcGuire

    Van

    Cott, 984).

    A

    studyrgued

    hat he ost f

    privatelyrovided

    ransit

    f ll

    standardypes

    s cheaper han

    public rovision

    ynoting

    hat

    verage

    perating

    osts er

    ehiclemilen heUnited tates

    ad-

    justed

    or nflation)

    ncreased

    y

    2.25

    imes he 950 ost etween 950

    nd1980.

    Most

    ransit

    systems

    ere rivatelyperated

    t he

    eginning

    f his

    eriod,

    ut t ts nd

    nearly

    ll

    hadbeen

    taken ver ypublic

    uthorities.

    lso,

    he esultsfvarioustudies

    n

    heUnited

    tates, ustra-

    lia,

    nd

    heUnited

    ingdom

    howed hat

    rivate

    arrierosts re bout

    0%

    ofpublic osts. he

    results

    re the amefor rivate

    irmshat

    ave aken verpublic

    ransitervicesMorlok

    Moseley,

    986;

    Morlok

    Veton, 985;

    both ited

    n

    Hilke, 992).

    The ffects

    f

    apital

    rants

    rom

    overnments

    uringhe 960-1975 eriodwere

    tudied.t

    wasfoundhat

    evenue

    assengers

    ecreased

    pproximately

    %,frequency

    ecreased 3%,real

    price ecreased

    0.7%, perator's age

    ate ncreased 4.7%,

    nd ost

    per us-hour

    ncreased

    28%. All

    types

    f

    public

    wnership

    ithout

    ubsidy

    xceptmanagement

    ontractsere ssoci-

    ated

    withower

    eal

    verage

    ares han

    egulatedrivate

    ares. ontract

    anagement

    ompanies

    charge

    ares

    lightlyigher

    han he

    rivateevel,

    nd

    municipally

    wned

    ystems

    nd ransit

    authoritiesharge

    he

    owest

    ares

    Anderson,

    983).

    Evaluationy

    contract

    ervice

    upplier

    ATE

    Management

    nd

    ervices) ompared

    ublic

    costs

    o their

    rivate

    osts

    f

    transporting

    choolchildren

    n

    Anchorage,

    laska. t was

    found

    that nchorage's

    osts or

    ontractchool us ervice

    as

    ignificantly

    ower han he ost f ts

    own

    istrict-providedervice,

    ith o

    pparent

    ifference

    n

    reliability

    r

    afetyATE

    Manage-

    ment nd

    Services,

    985,

    ited

    n Poole&

    Fixler, 987).

    Contracted

    dial-a-ride ervice ubstitutedor

    cheduledus ervice ecreasedosts

    y

    e-

    ducing

    vertime

    nd

    dle ime

    nd

    by

    using

    ess

    costly

    ehicles.

    t lso reduced osts

    ndirectly

    by

    ncouragingompetition

    ith

    raditionalervicesf he

    gencyTalley

    Anderson,986).

    Competitive

    ontract

    perationsrovided

    ost

    avings

    rom 0% to50% because f

    arger

    fleets,

    ess

    overhead,reater

    roductivity,

    nd ower

    wages Teal,

    Guiliano,

    Morlok, 986,

    cited n

    Hilke, 992).

    Contract

    xpress

    ommuter

    ervices

    ad

    30% to

    60% ower osts

    han id n-houseervices

    (RiceCenterorUrbanMobilityesearch, 985,

    ited

    n

    Hilke, 992).

    Wastewater

    Treatment

    Contractor-built

    nd

    operated

    reatmentacilities

    veraged

    0%

    to50%

    ess

    hann-house-

    built nd

    operated

    acilitiesue

    o

    horter

    onstruction

    ags

    nd ower onstruction

    osts. om-

    petition

    lso reduced

    perating

    osts

    0%

    to

    50%

    Hanke,

    985).

    This content downloaded from 210.187.26.2 on Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:28:50 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 8/17/2019 Local Government Contracting Service

    20/25

    Siegel/LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICE CONTRACTING 383

    Contractorastewaterervicewas

    20%

    to

    50%

    less costly ecause ederallyinanced roj-

    ects nvolve

    higher

    onstruction

    nd design osts Davis-BaconAct) Moore, 1988; Savas,

    1987).

    Water

    Supply

    In-house ersus rivateuppliers

    ere

    omparednvolving

    12

    organizations.herewas

    a

    detailed ase study

    f wo irmshat

    witchedype f wnership.ublic uppliers ere 0% less

    productive.

    ublic

    irms

    oing rivate

    ad

    25%

    ncrease

    n

    output er mployee.

    rivate irms

    going ublic

    had n

    output er mployee

    ecrease

    f40%

    (Crain

    &

    Zardkoohi, 978, ited

    n

    Hilke,1992).

    No costdifferencesere ound fterontrollingor ther ost actorsetweenn-housend

    private ater ompaniesFeigenbaum Teeples, 982, itednSavas, 1987).

    A

    comparison

    f n-house

    nd

    privateuppliers

    ound

    ublicmodes

    o

    be 20%

    more

    xpen-

    sive

    fter

    djusting

    or

    nput rices Mann

    &

    Mikesell, 976,

    ited

    n

    Hilke, 992).

    In-house ersus rivateuppliersonsistingf 143firms

    n

    ix tateswere ompared. osts

    were15% higher

    or

    ublic

    irms

    Morgan, 977,

    ited

    n

    Hilke, 992).

    References

    Ahlbrant,

    .

    S.,

    Jr.

    1973). Municipalfirerotection

    ervices:Comparisonf lternative

    rganizational

    forms. everly ills,CA: Sage.

    Ahlbrant,. S.,

    Jr.

    1974).

    mplications

    f

    ontractingor ublic ervice.

    Urban

    Affairs

    uarterly,

    ,337-

    358.

    Alexander, . L.,

    &

    Pallas,

    A. M.

    (1983).

    Private

    chools

    ndpublic olicy:New evidence

    n cognitive

    achievement

    n

    public ndprivatechools. ociology f

    Education, 6,

    170-182.

    American ederation

    f

    tate, ounty,

    nd

    Municipal mployees.

    1987). Whenpublic

    ervices

    oprivate:

    Not lwaysbetter,ot lways

    honest,heremay e a better ay.Washington,C: Author.

    Ammons,

    .

    N.,

    &

    Hill,

    D.

    J. 1995).

    The

    viability

    f

    public-private

    ompetition

    s a

    long

    erm ervice

    e-

    livery trategy.ublic

    ProductivityManagement eview, 9, 12-14.

    Anderson,

    .

    C.

    (1983).

    The effect

    f

    governmentwnership

    nd

    ubsidy

    n

    performance:

    vidence rom

    thebustransitndustry.ransportationesearch, 7,

    191-200.

    ATE Managementervices. 1985). Executiveummary: upil transportationrogram orAnchorage

    SchoolDistrict.

    eport

    ubmittedo

    Anchorage

    chool

    District, nchorage,

    K.

    Bailey,R.

    W.

    1987). Uses

    and

    misuses

    f

    privatization.

    n

    S.

    H.

    Hanke Ed.), Prospectsor

    privatization

    (pp. 138-152).New

    York:Academy f Political cience.

    Barnekov, .,

    &

    Raffel, .

    A. (1990). Publicmanagementf

    privatization.ublicProductivityManage-

    ment eview, 4,135-152.

    Barnum,

    .

    T.,

    &

    Gleason,

    .

    M. 1979).Measuringhe nfluencef ubsidies ntransit

    fficiency

    nd effec-

    tiveness.Washington,C: UrbanMass Transportation

    dministration.

    Becker, ., ilverstein,., & Chaykin,

    .

    (1995). Public mployee

    ob securityndbenefits:

    barriertori-

    vatizationfmental ealth ervices. ublic

    Productivity

    Management eview, 9,

    25-33.

    Bennett, .,

    Di

    Lorenzo,

    .

    1983).

    Public

    mployee

    nions

    nd

    he rivatizationfpublic ervices.

    our-

    nal ofLaborResearch,, 33-45.

    Bennett,., Johnson,

    .

    1981).

    Bettergovernmentatalf

    he

    rice:Privateproductionfpublic

    ervices.

    Ottawa,

    L:

    Caroline

    House.

    Berenyi,

    .

    B.,

    &

    Stevens,

    .

    J.

    1988).

    Does

    pri