Living in Towns: Volume 1
-
Upload
cork-city-centre -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of Living in Towns: Volume 1
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 2/44
INTERREG lie Project
**** ** ** ****
H W
North WestMetropolitan Area
Q)
E::::s-
Living in Towns
An Analysis of the Processes and Policies
to Encourage Urban Living
Volume I
Synopsis of Study
This volume is available in French and German
Partners in the Project
• South Bank University
• Ville d'Arrnentieres
• City of Cork Corporation
• Hampshire County Council
• City of Limerick Corporation
• Maidstone Borough Council
• Ville de Mons
• Stadt Witten
• NHTV and City of Breda
Funding of the Project
• European Regional
Development Fund (ERDF)
through the INTERREG lIe
Programme
• Matched funding from
Partners
• Department of Transport,Local Government and the
Regions, UK
• Royallnstitution of Chartered
Surveyors, UK
This document has been written on behalf of the Partnership by the project team at
South Bank University (lead partner). Design and production Graphics Service,
Faculty of the Built Environment, South Bank University, London, UK.
December 2001
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 3/44
Published by South Bank University
South Bank University is a charity and a company limited by guarantee, Registered in England No 986761.
Registered Office: 103 Borough Road, London SE1 OAA.
'.
..
-.
"
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 4/44
Contents
Executive Summary 5
Introduction
1.1 Project Context and Objectives 1I
1.2 Constructing a Partnership 1I
1.3 Methodology 12
2 Background factors
2.1 The Towns and their Character 15
2.2 Defining the Study Areas 16
2.3 Demography and Social Structure 17
2.4 General Economic Condition 18
3 Context
3.1 The Urban Policy Context 19
3.2 Housing Policy 20
3.3 Tenure Structures 21
3.4 Planning Policy and the Residential Market 22
3.5 Private / Public Partnerships 24
3.6 Financial and Fiscal Policy in the Process 27
3.7 Management Style 27
4 Practice
4.1 Planning Policies inTown Centres 31
Urban Design 31
Safety 33
Transport Policies .33
Housing Improvement 34
4.2 Land Assembly and Management 34
4.3 Finance and Investment 35
4.4 Co-ordination of Agencies and Strategies 35
4.5 Programming 36
4.6 Public Perception of Urban Living 36
5General
Objectives andRecommendations
Livng inTowns:Volume I:Synopsis of Study 3
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 5/44
Volume 2a
Study Objectives and Case Study Towns
Volume 2b
Change, Housing Opportunities and the Development PrCC3:iS
SummaryVolume 2a
Introduction
1.1 The Objectives of the Project
1.2 Methodology
1.3 The Empirical Case Studies
2 TheTowns and their Characteristics
2.1 Demography and Social Structure
2.2 Land Use Change
2.3 Amenities and the Environment
2.4 Circulation and Transport
2.5 The Perception of the Town as a Place to Live
SummaryVolume 2b
Part One: Change and Housing Opportunities
I Introduction
2 National Housing Systems
3 Planning Policy Frameworks for Housing Provision
4 Housing Plans at Local Level
5 Sites and Spaces for Housing
6 Summary
PartTwo:The Development Process
7 Introduction
8 LandTenure Systems
9 Agencies for Development
10 Financial Resources
I I Developing the Site
4 Living inTowns:Volume I: Synopsis of Study
, .,
"
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 6/44
Executive Summary
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVES
• The Project has been undertaken as part of the
INTERREG lIe programme. It supports an
important objective of the programme in the
NorthWest Metropolitan Area of Europe to use
residential growth as a motor for the regeneration
of urban centres and the enhancement of the
urban fabric.
• The principal objective of the project is to identify
examples of innovation, good policy and practice
that encourage greater residential activity within
the centre of medium-sized towns (75-150,000
population) and to highlight those that are
transferable between nations.• Case studies of several towns in the NWMA
provide the focus for the project: Limerick and
Cork (Ireland), Armentieres (France), Mons
(Belgium), Breda (Netherlands), Witten
(Germany), Maidstone and towns in Hampshire
(England).
METHODOLOGY
• The project team comprised representatives from
the South Bank University London (lead partner),
the municipalities and the County Council for
Hampshire, and the Netherlands Institute of
Tourism and Transport Studies in conjunct ion
with the city of Breda.
• The study process was led by the research team
from South Bank University who acted as the
agents for the communication and t ransfer of
information between par tners and as the
principal analysts of information obtained from
them.
• A Steering Group drawn from the partners, and
chaired by a representative from one of the
Living inTowns:Volume I: Synopsis of Study
municipalities, monitored and discussed progress
of the project and ensured consensus on how it
should proceed . It met formally on four
occasions, combining meetings with visits to
most of the case study towns.
• The analys is focussed on the study of eight topic
areas that the partnership considered might have
an influence on sustainable living in the centre of
towns. Materi al on the case study towns was
prepared by partners in the context of a cr itical
review of regional and national information and a
wider literature study.
PROJECT OUTCOMESThe findings of the project are presented in three
documents.
• Volume One: Synopsis of Study
This comprises the synopsis of the study
incorporating the background characteristics of
the towns, the policy contexts within which they
operate, and local initiatives and examples of
local practice. I t incorporates an executive
summary, also available as a separate document.
This document is available in English, French and
German.
• Volume 2a: Study Objectives and Case Study
Towns
This presents a detailed explanation of the project
objectives and methodology incorporating a
literature review of publications drawn from each
participating country. The characteris tics of the
case study towns are summarised and their
respective central areas defined.
5
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 7/44
• Volume 2b: Change, Housing Opportunities
and the Development Process
This examines the national housing systems,
looking in more detail at the policy frameworks
for plilnning housing provision at
national/regional and local levels. Consideration
is given to how these processeswork in the study
towns and what opportunities exist in each for
residential development. Important components
of the residential development process, land
tenure, development agencies, and financial
resources, are evaluated drawing on examples
and experience of the case study towns.
BACKGROUND CHARACTERISTICS OF THE
CASE STUDY TOWNS
• Case study towns are free standing, although
Armentieres and Witten are influenced by their
position in larger urban complexes of Lille and
the Rhur respectively.
• Each t own has some historic focus but specific
historic towns were not chosen as it was felt that
such special characteristics might skew housing
markets.
• Most study towns experienced population
decline since at least the 1950's, especially in their
inner areas.• A change from population decline to slow growth
was evident in Armentieres, Breda and
Maidstone. This trend had become more
pronounced during the last decade in both Cork
and Limerick.
• Slow decline in population continuing in Witten
and Mons.
• Hampshire towns are untypical as they showed
population growth throughout the study period.
• The general pat tern was a decline in numbers
among the very young and elderly and
significant growth in young adults . There was a
general decline in average household size with
increasing numbers and proport ions of single-
person households.
• A shift towards a more 'middle class' population
and increasing numbers of students resident in
the centre of towns having institutions of higher
education was a general characteristic.
POLICY CONTEXT
• There is evidence of convergence of urban policy
6
at national level in each country.
• The regeneration of towns is taking place in a
climate where the cohesion of the many strands
of policy embracing, for example, social,
employment and training, transport, design,
planning and housing are ref lec ted in more
integrated approaches to practice.
• Recent Irish, Walloon and French planning
legislation, together with policy statements in
England, have tended to take a more holistic view
of the policy process.
HOUSING POLICY
• National policy in each count ry encourages
growth of home ownership .
• Such an aim need not militate aga ins t the
encouragement of more residential
accommodation in the centre of towns.
• Local authori ties are seeking varie ty in tenures
and flexibility among housing agencies in the
provision of new homes in town centres.
• In Germany and Belgium there is strong and
longstanding encouragement to private
landlords. Measures to encourage this sector
have been int roduced in Ireland and England
more recently.
• Social housing providers have an important rolein each country as agents of regeneration of older
areas of housing: this is strongest in France and
weakest in Ireland and Germany.
PLANNING POLICY
• In England, France, Belgium and the Netherlands
there are clear policy directives to maximise the
use of inner urban land for housing and to restrict
urban sprawl.
• Such policy is no t so prominent in Ireland or
Germany but in each country such measures are
gaining greater acceptance.
• Mechanisms are emerging in each country that
are becoming part of the planning process for the
analysis of housing need/demand and supply
and extending this into considerations of urban
capacity and programming of land release for
housing development.
• A generalised model for the p lanning and
development of housing is suggested from an
analysis of such policy processes.
• Each local authority in the project, reflecting their
Living inTowns:Volume I: Synopsis of Study
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 8/44
national context, has a particular strength among
the steps within the model.
• The spatial structures of the case study towns
have been examined to identi fy development
opportunities within a categorisation of
greenfield sites, brownfield si te s, infiIl sites,
conversion of redundant non-residential
buildings, and reclamation of abandoned
residential premises.
PUBLIC-PRIVATE INTERACTION
• The ex tent of publ ic sector direct involvement in
the development process varies greatly and is a
reflection of the cul ture of respective countries
and the social /economic circumstances of the
towns being s tudied. Public intervent ion in the
market tends to be greater in France than in the
other countries.
• There is an extensive programme of loans and
grants in each country to assist investment by
individuals, households and organisations to
facilitate the provision of new or improved
housing accommodation. There appear to be
fewer schemes available to assist the potential
occupiers of the accommodation provided.
• Public funding is most for thcoming in France
through central government agencies (Caisse desDepots) and local agencies (SEM's) and
mechanisms (ZAC's).
• The use of fiscal incent ives has attracted interest
in most of the count ries s tudied: Germany
supports private development of social housing;
the French Besson Scheme supports private
rented accommodation at agreed renta l levels.
The Urban Task Force and related policy debates
in England also encourage such measures. Every
country is developing proposals for the
encouragement of more living above shops. Theapplication of fiscal incentives has been most
developed in Ireland through successive
programmes up to the most recent Urban
Renewal Tax Scheme (and the associated flats
over the shop scheme) tha t has generated a
significant volume of private rented
accommodation in central areas of both Cork and
Limerick.
MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE
• There is a d iverse range of agencies operating in
Living inTowns:Volume I: Synopsis of Study
each town ha ving an interest in central area
activities and particularly in housing.
• Within the Netherlands and Germany, housing
has been an integral part of the town planning
system for many years. In England, Ire land and
Belgium the sharper focus on housing in national
debates about planning for a sus ta inable future
has rekindled positive dialogue among town
planning and housing professionals. Practical
expression of this in France is less clear.
• All municipalities to a greater or lesser extent
operate in circumstances of limited budgets, bu t
in some instances the lack of political will was as
much a barrier to pro-active act ion as the lack of
resources.
• A significant influence on effective policy
implementat ion is the extent of interaction and
co-operation among departments within the
municipality and between these departments and
associated quasi-public and private bodies,
among the most important of which are the town
centre manager and local chambers of commerce.
All partners were actively improving such intra
authority co-operation.
• The style of town government appeared to be
influential . The directly elected mayor in
Armentieres and Witten afforded a focussed anddirective leadership and co-ordination, driving
their towns to reach a given vision.
LOCAL PRACTICE
• Urban Design. All towns have introduced or are
draft ing guidance on urban design so as to
enhance the public realm, building facades,
conversions of empty space above shops to
residential use, and infill developments.
Particular attention is being given to key
thoroughfares, town squares and areas adjoiningrailway stations.
• Safety. While there has been no stat ist ica l
evidence available to support the view that town
centres are intrinsically more unsafe than
elsewhere there is an increasing accent on safety
in such areas both for residents and visitors. The
project partners examined the extensive CCTV
scheme operating in Maidstone noting that many
of the Hampshire towns had similar schemes in
their town centres. The French and German
partners expressed reservations about the
7
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 9/44
acceptability of such extensive schemes operating
in the public realm in their own towns.
• Transport. In Cork, Limerick,Maidstone and the
Hampshire towns the local policy appears to be
d irected to maintaining hut m:maging car access
so as to reduce its impact on the town centre.
Within Mons, Breda , Witten and Armentieres
there are clear inves tments in the quali ty of the
town centres through public transport schemes to
and wi thin the centre. Provision for the use and
parking of cycles is more sophisticated in Breda
than elsewhere.
• Local Financial Schemes. Most finance made
available for restoration of buildings is from
national or regional programmes channelled via
local councils. There are few truly local initiatives
largely due to the limited annual budgets of local
councils . An example of an initiative is
Armentieres municipality 's joint venture with its
Transferable Practice or Policy
Integrated Town Planning and Housing Systems
Public Perception Analysis
Housing Needs Analysis
Urban Capacity Study Methodology
Land Availability Study
Programming Release of Housing Land
Town Centre Transport
Cycle Ways and Managed Cycle Parking
Local Financial Schemes: Public I Private Joint Venture
Fiscal Incentives fo r Private Housing Investment
CCTV Schemes in Town Centre
Styles of Local Governance
8
local chamber of commerce and several banks to
provide a subsidy to interest on loans for the
improvement works to bu ildings in the town
centre.
• Public Perception . .A.n early initiative of
Hampshire County Council to carry out a
questionnaire su rvey to assess the public
perception of the advantages and problems of in
town living was innovative and commended to
all partners.
CONCLUSIONS
The following areas of practice or policy context in
one partner town attracted the interest of others in
the project as providing a different model and fount
of ideas for innovation and development in their
own practice.
Other benefits that relate to the broader objectives of
Example Town I Country
Breda, Netherlands
Hampshire CC, England
Hampshire CC, England
Hampshire CC and Maidstone,
England
Cork,lreland
Mons, Belgium
Witten, Germany and Mons.
Belgium
Breda, Netherlands
Arrnentieres, France
Cork and Limerick, Ireland
Maidstone, England
Armentieres, France and Witten,
Germany
Living inTowns:Volume I: Synopsis of Study
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 10/44
the INTERREGprogramme have included:
• In working with other European towns facing
similar issues concerning urban centres, the
partner towns have opened up perspectives not
only on the subject of the study but also on other
aspects of professional life, yie lding ideas for
beneficial policy development.
• The established network among representatives
of the towns is open to be used by partner towns
in the future to seek information and opinion,
and to explore further initiatives together.
Living inTowns:Volume I:Synopsis of Study 9
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 11/44
10 Living in Towns:Volume I : Synopsis of Study
,"
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 12/44
Introduction
1.1 PROJECT CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVES
An important objective of the North West
M et ro po li ta n A re a (NWMA) INTERREG lIe
research programme is th e m ai nte na nc e an d
enhancement of the viability of the urban centres
within the region, which is perhaps the most
urbanised in Europe. It is also intended to reverse
the process of decline an d degradation, caused by
economic structural change, which characterises
ma ny urban centres large an d small. These
att ributes help to compound a negat ive attitude
t ow ar ds t ow ns an d cities which is reflected in
popular reaction to them as being centres of crime,
pollution, traffic congestion, noise a nd poorenvironments.
The need to address these related problems is made
clear in certain of the objectives of the INTERREG
p ro gr am m e w hi ch are applicable to Measure 1.2
under which this Project is undertaken: for example
• To promote the quality of life in cities
• To balance the interest of medium sized towns
an d metropolitan areas
• To reduce unnecessary travel
• To prevent urban sprawl given th e relentless
process of peri-urbanisation in all member States
• To preserve an d enhance the cultural heritage
With this in mind the 'Living in Towns ' Project s et o u t
to focus on the p ar ti cu la r e n vi r on m en t of the
medium sized towns in the urban hierarchy a nd to
achieve the following subsidiary objectives related
to them within national policy contexts:
• To identify an d compare processes affecting the
Living inTowns:Volume I: Synopsis of Study
section I
scale an d type of population living in town
centres in smaller urban areas within the NWMA
area.
• To identify the types of agencies engaged in
promoting greater liv ing in town centres, their
role an d objectives, mechanisms ad opted an d
degree of integration an d co-operation.
• To identify common problems an d achievements
an d to seek explana tions for differences an d
similarities in processes evident in each town
centre an d the responses to them by the priva te
an d public agencies studied
• To prepare and apply mechanisms for th e
evaluat ion of the experience within the towncentres studied an d which highlights innovative
policies an d mechanisms in the spatial planning
of r es id en ti al s et tl em en t which may be
considered by other member States
The Project therefore set ou t to analyse the patterns
of change in such medium sized centres an d to
discern what problems are no w manifesting
themselves. This wa s fol lowed by the examination
of the nature of the processes acting on such centres
to m ak e u rb an living less than desirable an d from
this to outline an d compare the policy responses of
the governments, national, regional an d local to the
problem. From this, examples of 'Good Practice'
an d innovative ideas could be demonstrated an d
more widely publicised within the urban
community.
1.2 CONSTRUCTING A PARTNERSHIP
Constructing a p art n er shi p , w h ich would give a
wide enough range of choice of towns in the main
countries, was t ime consuming. However using
11
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 13/44
University links such as that to Breda, and other
contact networks, the kernel of the partnership was
created. This consisted of a group of towns which
demonstrated the range of urban variety in 6 of the
NWMA Member States. .tu the same time
Hampshire County Council was also in the process
of creating a similar INTERREG IIc project and with
the co-operation and assistance of the Secretariat the
objectives of the two potentially overlapping project
ideas were brought together. Hampshire then
became one of the partners in 'Living in Towns'.
This brought a wider perspective to the Project by
adding a selection of different urban environments
within the one strategic planning structure and by
bringing a contrasting perspective to the local one of
the medium sized towns which formed the rest of
the partner authorities.
The partnership thus consisted of the following
local authorities;
• The Ville d'Armentieres in the Nord Pas -de
Calais Region France
• The Netherlands Ins ti tute of Tourism and
Transport Studies (NHTV) in conjunction with
the City of Breda, Netherlands.
• The City of Cork Corporation, Republic of Ireland• The City of Limerick Corporation, Republ ic of
Ireland
• Hampshire County Council, England
• Maidstone Borough Council, Kent, England
• The Ville de Mons, Wallonie, Belgium
• The Stadt Witten, Nord Rhine Westphalia,
Germany
The financing of the project relied on match funding
from all 7 full partner towns and the University and
from supporting funds from the DETR and the
RICS. In the case of Breda, which was unable to join
the partnership fully before the project approval
date there was no direct funding under the
programme bu t staff and students at the NHTV,
which has a strong Planning and Housing
Department, assisted the South Bank University
team. They also liaised with the City Council.
1.3 METHODOLOGY
Unlike all but one of the other INTERREG IIc
projects the University was the project co-ordinator.
12
This had several advantages. Firstly itwas apparent
that to 'normal' Local Authorities beset with the
budget constraints in running their statutory duties,
the possibility of sending staff on fact finding tours
ability to keep in touch with the literature, both
academic and professional, on a subject such as
town centre policy across several countries is
equally limited. The co-ordinating team did not
have these constraints and was able to move freely,
both physically and intellectually over the 'terrain'
and act as a conduit for information between the
partners.
Furthermore the co-ordinating team had the t ime
and a knowledge of the intellectual structures
needed to analyse and sift this information and
present it to the partner authori ties in a way that
was of value to them.
The main research work and management of the
project was undertaken by the co-ordinating team,
which consisted of three people: a Project Manager
who was responsible for the management and
financial aspects of the work, particularlywithin the
University, a Research Fellow, who as Project co
ordinator was responsible for the ongoing analyticalwork and links and interaction wi th Par tner
authorities and a ResearchAssistant. This latter post
was filled by a temporary appointment and then by
a permanent appointee. However two other staff
were funded for this task, one to liaise with the City
of Breda and deal with material in Dutch, the other
to ass ist in the l iaison with the Stadt Witten and to
assist in the handling of material received in
German.
Each of the partner authorities had one member of
staff who was responsible for the project and who
was assi sted of ten by other staff and who was
responsible for involving and progressing the
contributions of other professionals and political
figures in each town .
A full list of the Project Personnel is given in an
Appendix to this volume
The co-ordinating teamwere however always aware
that they were act ing with, and on behal f of, thei r
Living inTowns:Volume I: Synopsis of Study
','
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 14/44
partners. The working process was therefore always
open to amendment and redirection in order to
enhance the outcome for the local authorities
concerned as well as to provide more theoretical
insights into the differences of policy and practice.
Although there was constant interaction between
the co-ordinating team and the other partners, the
key forum for the discussion and advance of the
work was the SteeringGroup . This was chaired by a
member of the partner towns and the co-ordinating
team brought their findings and recommendations
to this forum for ratification and discussion. At
every meeting there were constructive discussions
of the progress and the articulation of the themes
and issues which should be followed up and
developed. Thus the final report will have been
placed before this committee and agreed before its
final production and will reflect the joint
contributions of the Partnership.
A central feature of the project were the Site Visits to
partner authori ties. These were programmed to
coincide with Steering Group meetings which were
rotated around partner authori ties as much as
practically possible. In addition the University co
ordinating teammade research and discussion visits
to all partners throughout the project.
This afforded each host partner the opportunity to
demonstrate what had been done in thei r town to
tackle the problems of urban depopulation, both
within their national policy contexts and from their
own initiatives.
In every case the opportunity was taken to meet
with key figures in the planning and administrative
process in each town and very tight schedules of
visits and discussions were undertaken. These were
immensely informative as well as affording social
oppor tuni ties for the partner representatives to
extend their interchange of ideas in a more informal
way.
The projectwas constructed in a series of four Work
Packages which took the thread of the work through
a per iod of initial information gathering to a final
stage of report production.
The first work package stage was an introductory
Living inTowns:Volume I: Synopsis of S udy
one and culminated at the first steering group
meeting in Maidstone. At this meeting eight
research questions derived from the original project
objectives statement were circulated to all partner
towns.
These covered the following topics
• Demography
• Environment
• Transport
• Land Tenure
• Planning Policies
• Financial Mechanisms
• Agencies In the process
• Public Perceptions
The aim was to have a set of information bases
which were as consistent across the towns as could
be made possible. These were intended to provide a
basic body of information from which the main
issues and policy approaches in each could be
abstracted and further issues which focussed more
clearly on the question of the residential component
of the core areas and its policy context identified.
The analysis of the eight questions, the main body ofwork in Work Package 2, led to the identification of
three main lines of iterative analysis for Work
Package 3. The first of these was the identification of
the characterist ics of the towns which were of
interest and provided some contextual background
to understanding the problems faced by each. The
second was the outlining of the National or
Regional Policy contexts which had a significant
affect on the initiatives taken by each town. The final
section dealt with the detai ls of the practice evident
in each location and specific initiatives taken by the
towns themselves. From both the policy description
and the local practice it was intended that instances
of good practice could be identified and a summary
of the major examples of 'best practice' is given in
section 4.
In each case the topic under review was tackled in a
comparative manner and thereby the ancillary
objectives of the project to make such cross national
analyses was fulfiled.
13
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 15/44
A major objective at the outset of the project wa s the
examination of the literature existing on the subject
of the variety of methods of developing housing in
urban areas, in all the member States represented
and specific to the Study towns, and a Literature
Revie w was included as a pr imary task of theproject.
This proved a more difficult ta sk than first
envisaged, and in man y wa ys remains an
unfinished exercise . However enough was gleaned
to enable all the partners to get a grasp of the range
of practice and analysis which had already taken
place. The fact that local authority partners were
being invited to participate in an exercise previously
considered somewhat 'academic' and that it opened
up a wider perspective on a problem common to all
of them was perhaps the first po sitive result of the
Study.
Reviewing and attempting to use the results of
existing literature from English and Irish sources
was easier, not because of language accessibility, but
there seemed to be more interaction between the
authorities and the literature than in other countries.
Extending the review awa y from an Anglo-Irish
base was a major challenge.
Although general texts, which were not space
specific, were reviewed, in the various national
surveys clear spatial delimitations were necessary at
certain levels. In the United Kingdom only material
relating to England wa s examined, and in the cases
of Belgium and Germany, both federal S ta tes,
official documents related to the relevant Regional
authorities, Wallonie and Nord Rhein Westphalen
respectively.
The material reviewed wa s cla ssified under 6
headings,
• European Policy documents
• National, Regional and Local Policy documents
• Official reports
• Other studies
• Books
• Articles
The review is incorporated into the presentation and
analysis of material to be found in Volume 2a.
This review exposed the current wide range of
interest in the question of at tempting to reverse the
decline in population in western European towns
and more particularly how it can be achieved. It alsorevealed a common concern in all the study
countries and a variety of means of approach which
was reflected in both Na tional policy and local
practice in the study towns. A major feature has
been that this process is gathering pace and that
during the project period there were a number of
significant reports and initiatives published on this
issue which the co-ordinating team had to take into
account.
In addition a full list of the documentation
consulted will be given in the Volume 2b.
The working structure did not howe ver envisage
that the interaction of the entire partnership would
throw up certain 'unintended' results. These will also
be pointed out and areas where continuing
research, perhaps through the INTEREGG III
programme could be undertaken will be identified.
It wa s considered that the Methodology in itself was
one of these. In essence, due perhaps to the
perceived need to structure an academically led
Project, it had been thought through in terms of its
stru cture, process of working and analytical
frameworks before it wa s begun. However enough
flexibility was available to allow for unseen
evidence and issues.
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 17/44
sense of integrity as places but each also had
physical links to the ou ter town which extended
their core areas. The integration of these
surrounding areas into the urban core was a major
objective in both towns,
The Irish towns had been most vacated and faced
t he c learest cha ll enges to restore their former
cohesion. Cork had several elements which had
already been used to do this . Firstly the scheme for
North Main Street was a beginning of an approach
to renewal whi le the Shandon area with its
dominating church gave an off centre landmark
around which an ancillary regeneration focus could
be bui lt . Limerick equal ly had a two centre town.
The main commercia l area in Irish town gave one
focus where the Georgian heritage could be used as
stimulant to enhancement and population growth.
Beside it the old his toric core of English town had
the landmarks of the Anglican cathedral and the
castle to form a basis for skilful design of new
introductions.
In England, Maidstone has two main elements to its
urban form. The All Saints Church, the Tyrwhitt
Carriage museum and the Archbishop's Palace on
the banks of the river Medway provide the historicalcore, while the commercial centre is a long the old
roman road of Week Street and the High Street,
particularly around the Town Hall and the Queen's
Monument
The Hampshire towns were varied in character from
the historic cohesion of Winchester to the 'New
Town' character of Basingstoke and the 19th century
' industry' based centres of Aldershot and Eastleigh.
Four of the Towns had major water ways, canals or
rivers as significant elements in their visual
character, Breda, Cork, Limerick and Maidstone and
in each case there was growing realisation of this as
a factor to enhance the attractiveness of the town as
a place to live .
The character of each is i llustrated in Volume 2a.
2.2 DEFINING THE STUDY AREAS
A full picture of the study areas defined for the
project is given in Volume 2a.
16
In summary, the approach to defining areas for
more detailed study of the process of resident ial
development in town centres was quite pragmatic.
While a series of factors was examined to help
these did no t fit universally. For example, a 10
minutes walk from the Town centre, or the edge of
the essentially pre 1914 town etc, were considered as
rough guides. For instance, due to wa r time
des truction, the centre of Witten had been rebuilt
and was in large part much newer than the other
town centres. Also in Mons and Breda, the use of
the lines of former fortifications, in one case the old
walls in the other the encircling canals, gave clear
definitions to the inner-town area although in
certain places the processes of urban flight had gone
outside of these. In Cork the City council had
defined an inner area for its own purposes and this
suited the purposes of ou r study admirably. In
Limerick the old cores of English town and Irish
town defined the inner area clearly. Armentieres as
an individual commune with no suburbs within its
urban area, these hav ing been constructed in
neighbouring communes on both sides of the
Franco- Belgian border, was again easily identifiable
as a study area in its own right. In Hampshire, the
County Council focussed upon town centres withina number of towns, Aldershot, Alton,
Basingstoke,Eastleigh, Havant,and Winchester,
which were selected to represent a sample of the
urban centres in the County. In Witten there was a
clear Urban Centre, but around it and adjacent were
certain a reas wh ich were po tentially going to
change and should also be studied. Only in
Maidstone was there some definitional problem as
the Town Centre study area and the ward
boundaries were not contiguous and neither
covered some areas around the town where
interesting processes of change were occurring. A
fluid area for study was therefore proposed and
used.
In essence the Team considered that an academic
discussion of how to define a core area would not
produce a result that would enhance ou r
understanding of the processes and actors in the
repopulation of towns of this scale. Moreover
having certain boundaries would be useful
provided they did not unduly constrain the scope of
Living inTowns:Volume I : Synopsis of Study
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 18/44
the analysis.
2.3 DEMOGRAPHY AND SOCIAL
STRUCTURE
Any comparative study of population numbers and
characteristics is prone to a number of challenges ;variable census data and dates of collection ;
variability of definit ions between countries and
even over the years wi th in the same country, etc.
The study had to contend with a series of such
obstacles but a few conclusions could be drawn on
the processes and patterns of demographic change
which were of value to the understanding of the
problems each town faced .
Generally until the early 1990's, population decline,
slow but measurable, was the hallmark of the cores
of all of the study towns. It was most marked in the
two Irish towns and least evident inHampshire. The
period from around 1985 onwards is more
interesting because from then on, at different times,
each town began to show signs of a slowdown and
in some cases, a reversal of this process, although
the incomplete nature of the figures after the round
of censuses in 1990/1/2 makes too assertive an
analysis difficult.
The turnaround is most marked in the Hampshire
towns, where our understanding is that a
combination of existing strong planning policies
against urban sprawl and a very buoyant London
commuter housing market have given the impetus
to the redevelopment and use of in-town land for
housing. Sites available in proximity to stations
were clearly favoured by developers.
In-town population stability was evident in Breda,
where again the potent ia l for spatial expansion is
limited. A reversal of decline was also evident in
Limerick, Armentieres, Maidstone and Cork, and
perhaps most mildly in Mons.
In Witten the decline has continued, although there
is no evidence of an increase in property vacancy
such as had happened in the other towns.
In part the reason for these changes can be derived
from an analysis of the age changes manifested in
each. The decline in Witten has been paralleled by a
Living inTowns:Volume I: Synopsisof Study
relentless ageing of the population. This is due to
the fact that the current population moved in to the
town in the 1950's when it was extensively rebuilt.
The families created then have begun to move out
leaving an ageing population which has no t as yet
become too old to vacate their original homes. In theother towns mentioned, al though there is a large
elderly population, the hallmark has been the
increase in the population of young single people at
the expense of families with young children. This is
clearly reflected in a universal decrease in the size of
households, mostmarked in Ireland.
This has given rise to concern in Partner towns such
as Mons and Breda, where the result of this shift has
been the lack of development of facilities for
chi ldren in core areas. This merely accelerates the
movement of families from these areas
All of the towns also exhibited a clear change in the
socio-economic structure of this population
although the quality of information on this was
variable between towns. Most had significant
'working class' elements in the 1960's and 70's bu t
at differential rates this population has declined or
moved ou t to peripheral estates and been replaced
in more recent years with a more 'Middle Class 'structure of managers, technical staff and
professional groups.
Hidden in these figures but evident on the ground
was the effect of having major educational facilities
in the towns. In Cork, Breda and Mons, major
Universities provided a large mobile studentmarket
for private rented dwellings which was being used
to populate older private rented property. This was
also happening to a lesser extent in Winchester
which has a University college. Witten is developing
a new University which may affect this sector.
Certain other towns, Maidstone and Limerick had
higher education facilities but these general ly
served a local marke t and did no t generate a
resident population in their own right.
A final significant change was in the tenure
structure of the housing. Every town showed a
decline in the t radit ional tenure of private renting
and the growth of owner occupat ion or social
17
.'
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 19/44
housing. In Ireland p rivat e r en ting although
declining absolutely until very recently, did not do
so relatively because there was no great expansion
of the two other tenures to take its place . In the
English towns there was a considerable expansion
of owner occupation, freehold and leasehold, bu t
very little expansion of social housing. This
signified a desire by the author ities to constrain
direct intervention and to leave the ini tiat ive to the
private sector or to work closely with 'Registered
Social Landlords',who are not part of the municipal
structure. These were in marked contrast to the
continental examples in France, Belgium, and the
Netherlands where the social sector was a
significant agent in the reconstruct ion of town
centres.Germany
provided a sl igh tly differentexample where there was some social development
bu t tenure remained mainly in the private rented
sector. There was however little movement in the
property sector here and not enough to demonstrate
trends,
2.4 GENERAL ECONOMIC CONDITION
A final contextual subject, which almost resulted in
the formulation and test ing of a hypothesis was the
extent to which pol ic ies for the planning and
improvement of core areas were conditioned by
local economic conditions.
Here again it was not possible to come to definite
conclusions. Mons, in an area of serious economic
decline was comparable in the quality of its
environment to Maidstone in the prosperous South
East of England. Witten, which appeared to the co-
ordinating team to be sound and prosperous was
considered in a German context to be severely
disadvantaged,
Although local economic conditions affected critical
factors such as unemployment rates, wages,
spend ing power and therefore house prices and
rents, there was no evidence that they governed the
choice of residen tial location for differing social
groups. It was demonstrated by the analysis that
other factors such as lifestyle preference, the depth
of cultural attachment to an 'urban' rather than a
'rural' historic pattern of development and planning
policies which inhibited urban sprawl wereinfinitely more influential.
18
Thus in Ireland the recent unprecedented economic
growth has created house price inflation and driven
many households ou t of the owner occupied market
into a rented one which is less developed due to a
traditional lack of demand for housing for such a
population. The provision of rented housing to meet
this demand has been almost exclusively an in-town
phenomenon.
Living inTowns:Volume I: Synopsis of Study
'.
z:
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 20/44
Context
3.1 THE URBAN POLICY CONTEXT
In every pa rtner authori ty it was clear that they
were working within a set of policy parameters set
by national or regional authori ties. These had a
distinct influence and control on what could be
done.
The following policy areas were ident if ied as
exerting some influence on the action taken by
authorities in relation to their policies for town
centre regeneration:
• Housing policy
• Planning policies• Employment policies
• Social exclusion and other social policies
• Design policies
• Transport policies
• Organisational and management policies
Whatwas also evidentwas the extent to which these
were a consistent set of issues in each partner
country. The emphasis var ied a little bu t the
repopulation of urban areas was in reaction to
concerns in each of these .
As a result there has been a certain amount of
convergence in policy concerns and to a lesser
extent in the policy focus for action to tackle
problems. Thus the recent Irish, Walloon and French
planning legislation as well policy statements in
England tended to take a more holistic, socially
focussed view of the planning process and to treat it
more as a process rather than a regulatory
framework. As we noted, and will be outlined in
section 4, this is having a profound effect on practice
Living inTowns:Volume I: Synopsis of Study
section 3
at the local level.
Equally the area of housing policy was becoming a
central par t of a wider debate on the total context for
Urban Living.
In England, the Urban Task Force chaired by Lord
Rogers produced their final r epor t, 'Toward s an
Urban Renaissance' in 1999. The aim of this report
was to bring sustainability, good urban design and
better use of land, particularly in urban areas to the
top of the planning agenda. The recommendations
from this report fed in to the Government's Urban
White Paper, 'Our Town s and Cities: The Future -Delivering an Urban Renaissance' (November 2000).
The White Paper also amplified the policies for
using urban capacity studies and applying the
sequential test approach to identifying housing sites
introduced earlier in the Planning Policy Guidance
Note 3: Housing (March 2000)
Papers itinerant to these as well as the recent
'Approach to Neighbourhood Renewal', report give
a clear signal of a concentration of policy on the
regeneration of urban areas and of the need tointegrate all the Policy initiatives.
In France the creation of the 'Delegation
Interministerielle a la Ville' reflects a similar drive to
policy cohesion and regeneration of towns and
cities. Is has been followed by the influential 'Sueur'
Report, 'Demain la Ville ', and the translation of these
ideas into a new Planning Act. The emphasis has
shifted from the preparation of the more traditional
regulatory pas and SDAU structures to the more
flexible process oriented structure. Thus under the
19
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 21/44
Loi Solidarite et Renouvellement Urbain - SRU of
December 2000 the new Plans Locaux d'Urbanisme
will have to contain clear policy statements and
outline how the PLU will achieve them.
This is also reflected in the policy shifts evident in
Ireland and in the Belgian regions where new
legislation and policy guidance have accentuated
the need to rebuild the cores of towns and revitalise
them. In both Germany and the Netherlands the
integration of policy has been much more long
standing than in the other Member States bu t in
both there has been an official shift of policy for
variety of reasons, to urban regeneration.
In effect all the study towns were acting in National
contexts where their efforts to regenerate their
towns were officially encouraged in every aspect of
urban policy. Howeve r two areas have more
influence on the ability to succeed in this than
others, Housing Policy and Planning Policy.
3.2 HOUSING POLICY
A starting point for the analysis of the effectiveness
of strategies for the encouragement of urban living
is at the National level. The policies of each country
in respect of housing were examined in relation tothe following criteria
a) did they encourage tenures which could be more
easily accommodated in inner urban areas
b) did they have a bias spatially to the development
or improvement of housing in inner urban areas,
or were they integrated with planning policies
which did so.
In every country the first aim of National Housing
policy has been to encourage the growth of home
ownership. The differences between them was the
extent to which each national agency recognised the
limits of this pol icy and the extent to which they
were prepared to assist in the realisation of
alternatives where needed.
The greatest gap between the two occurred in
Ireland. The Irish government has a clear policy to
encourage home ownership and in the context of the
land tenure system this meant the development of
single family dwellings. The level of this tenure and
20
type is already the highest in western Europe
estimated at 81% in 2000.This has been backed by a
policy to sell off the existing stock of social 'council'
housing, although through the Planning and
Development Act 2000 the government will be
attempting to require 20% social housing included
in all private developments. The Irish Government
has also encouraged the growth of a 'voluntary
sector ' but so far it has been residual in its
application and an extension of the diminishing
social sector. The construction of private rented
apartments using tax incentives has been aimed at a
younger 'pre - ownership' population and is not the
beginning of the development of a major shift in
policy direction. Thus although the Irish must now
be (outside of Dublin) one of the bes t housed
nations in Europe, they live in house types which
are not generally suited to inner areas. There
appears to be no incentive to use or develop
English style long leases, which can accommodate a
form of owner-occupation with high density living.
Until the mid 1990's the policy approach in England
was in many ways similar, and the extension of
owner occupation has been the result. However the
existence of the 'leasehold' system which allows the
ownership of an apartment does facilitate theextension of owner occupation to all forms of
bui ld ing in all areas of a town. Equally the social
and private rented sectors can be found in all types
of development and therefore the encouragement of
owner occupation does not necessarily mean the
encouragement of individual houses and the
vacation of inner urban sites . Indeed in England and
France there is a process whereby social tenants can
transform their tenancy into ownership without
changing accommodation. This is known as
'staircasing' in England and 'Parcours Residentiel' inFrance.
Since the mid 1990's there has been a more balanced
approach to t enure types and Local Housing
Authorities (through their formal 3-5 year housing
strategies) now lead on the co-ordination of the
development and production of affordable homes in
inner areas by Registered Social Landlord (RSL)
partners.
Whilst the Housing Corporation's regulatory
Living inTowns:Volume I: Synopsis of S udy
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 22/44
processes govern the policy and practice of RSL's,
their development of affordable new homes is
greatly influenced by local housing partnerships,
local authori ty 3-5 year strategies and joint
commissioning arrangements (which include the
Housing Corporation).
The Housing Investment Programme (HIP) process
was introduced in 1977, and provides a mechanism
for local authority enabling activity by
programming the annua l investment of local
authority 'Social Housing Grant' (SHG) to housing
associations for specific affordable housing
schemes. The Housing Association's Approved
Development Programme (ADP) is also co-
ordinated and prioritised by the local authority each
year within a four year rolling programme . This
provides additional SHG for developing new homes
within the local authorities overall housing strategy
and priorities. The uniqueness of these
programming mechanisms appear to be overlooked
in the wider planning structure and now with the
growing cohesion of urban policy they represent
potential ways in which the new approaches in land
use planning, contained within PPG3, described
below, could be translated into a budget time plan
as well.
In the other partner countries a similar situation
holds in that under the more continental systems of
property ownership it is possible to hold an
apartment in fee simple and there is not therefore a
conflict between the pursuit of home ownership and
the development of multi unit blocks.
However in France, the Netherlands and Germany
the encouragement of owner occupation does not
work to the exclusion of the encouragement of other
tenures where appropriate and in a sense the policy
could almost be considered to be tenure neutral.
The situation in Belgium is more complicated. The
count ry has a historic bias to owner occupation of
individual and terrace housing bu t such ownership
of apartments is also common. Priva te renting is
also common bu t not subsidised. Social housing has
been a minor sector of the housing stock and has not
been given policy encouragement until recently in
Brussels and Wallonie.
Living inTowns:Volume I : Synopsis of Study
3.3 TENURE STRUCTURES
As can be seen from the above, the way in which
residential property is held or 'owned' is an
important factor in the land use pattern. The
national systems of tenure were studied in some
depth and a summary of this is given in the Volume
2b.
The main conclusions were tha t under all the
continental systems there is the possibili ty of
holding an apartment in 'fee simple' without being
under the title of someone else and this means that
apartment development is common and accepted.
In England and Ireland this can only be done under
the Leasehold system. The changes to the law
proposed in England, which will introduce
'Commonhold', a new form of ownership for multi
dwelling units, may introduce more flexibility and a
new tenure typewhich will be more useable in town
core areas. The leasehold system did not seem very
popular in Ireland where there is a strong desire for
full 'Freehold ' type tenure and the ownership of
individual houses, despite economic circumstances
throwing up an increasing number of younger more
mobile people who cannot necessarily afford this.
English style 'leases' for res idential proper ty, as a
variant of commercial property tenures have beenexperimented with in Belgium bu t have not proved
popular, The ownership of property 'free and
unencumbered' is a strong cultural factor!
In investigating this aspect of the nature of
residential tenure there were clear
misunderstandings as to the meaning and usage of
the term 'lease' between the continental partners
and the English and Irish ones. In the English
derived system (which does not include Scotland) a
lease is a property contract involving the division of
rights in a property and giving the lessee rights and
status which are tradeable as assets on the market; ie
a lease can be bought and sold as if it were a
freehold ownership. In the continental system a 'bail
a long duree' is a personal contract between two
individuals which is not an asset saleable by the
'lessee'. This may in part explain the 'cultural '
antipathy to this form of tenure experienced in
Belgium, bu t not in Ireland.
21
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 23/44
3.4 PLANNING 'POLICY AND THERESIDENTIAL MARKET
The Planning systems of the Member States
represented were examined. However since these
ha ve been summarised in other projects and
excellently descr ibed in the EU 'Compendium of
Planning Systems' series it was not felt necessary to
introduce such a summary to this project. Instead
the analysis has concentrated on the key question of
what policy and practice each system has for the
Planning of Housing, from statistical analyses of
markets and needs to the delivery of the
construction of residential dwellings.
The framework of planning policies is however
often a composite of other policies and the need to
locate housing in towns is often not encouraged
through planning policies for its own sake but to
achieve other objectives.
There is a range of planning policies which aim to
control the location and character of housing and
thereby make bette r use of urban area s; these
encompass
a) Aesthetic reasons to use derelict buildings or sites
b) To protect the urban fringe and surroundingcountryside for agricultural reasons or landscape
protection
c) To cut down on car usage and encourage public
transport
d) To create a 'critical mass' of people to use town
centre facilities and shops
More recently the need to control the consumer to
whom the housing is directed has also began to
feature in the objectives . Thus housing for social
sector tenants, affordable housing and key worker
housing ha ve become major concerns. However the
extent to which this can be achieved is dependent on
the abili ty of the planning mechanism to control the
end user of the housing. In England attempts to
introduce quotas of 'affordable housing' to all
developments have a chequered history. In France
and other States it is however possible within the
planning system to dictate the statute under which
the housing will be developed and sold or rented.
This gives continental countries an ability to
manipulate the social character of housing areas to a
22
greater degree and thus to meet needs for housing
for particular types of worker. In England the
housing of 'key workers' in labour shortage areas is
more of a housing mat ter than a planning matter
even although the reasons for it are of a wide
economic and social origin
In the Hampshire case in England, the local
authori ties in Basingstoke and Winchester have
gone further in commissioning studies of the nature
of housing 'need ' in their local economies to
underpin the rest of the housing provision process.
However such analyses underpin government
policy in the UK to ensure that 60% of all housing is
built on previously used 'Brownfield' land in and
adjacent to existing urban areas . The Dutch
Government also has a predisposi tion to restrict
development to existing urban areas
The mechanics of planning for housing has a certain
commonality in all countries and involves the
authorities in the drawing up of 'Land Availability'
studies.
These have recently evolved into more sophisticated
District wide 'Urban Capacity Studies' in Englandwhich theGovernment now require local authorities
to produce following publication in 2000 of the
Planning Policy Guidance No. 3 and the document
'Tapping the Potential '. These include the need for
the 'sequential tests', which must . be applied to
demonstrate that a site in an urban peripheral
location has only been pu t forward because sites in
more urban locations are not available or have
insurmountable development problems.
Essentially they involve looking at a series of
development opportunities which has been used in
the other national situations in this Project.
a) Greenfield Sites:
Land where there has been no previous
development. Not surprisingly the Project yielded
only one example of this, a site on the edge of the
town centre of Limerick
b) Brownfield Sites:
Land on which there has been previous
Living inTowns:Volume I: Synopsis of Study
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 24/44
development and the redevelopment for another
use is possible.
c) Infill sites:
Small parcels of land or derelict buildings that are
mixed in with other uses and which could be
developed for up to around 10 units. Gardens and
other spaces effectively abandoned behind frontage
developments are often ignored. They offer
considerable scope for well designed high density
developments that are sympathetic to the scale and
grain of the surrounding buildings as exemplified
by schemes in the centre of Mons.
d) Conversion sites:
Buildings no longer required in their original non
residential use that have potential for conversion to
provide dwellings. There is often conflict in policy
between the desire to convert the space to housing
use and the desire to retain the building in order to
maintain a stock of premises for other uses.
e) Recycling previous residential space I vacantproperty:
Spaces that would previously be in residential use
and could be reclaimed. Le.flats over shops
These policy directives are brought together in the
Development Plans which relate to any given
location. In the case of the English towns we are
examining they are translated into policy statements
in the County Structure Plans and into more precise
allocations in the Local orUnitary Development Plans
for each town.
A similar exercise has been developed in Belgium.
In the 1998 Reform of the Code Wallon
d'Amenagement du Territoire et d'Urbanisme and the
1999 adoption of the Regional Strategic Plan several
innovat ions were introduced to facil ita te the
monitoring of urban development:
• Introduction of a right to pre-emption
• Creation of a list of abandoned economic sites,
(SAED)
• Creation of an Operational Fund to be used for all
Regeneration Policies
The strategic plan has four main objectives:
Living inTowns:Volume I:Synopsis of Study
• Increase urban density, by recycling land and
buildings
• Articulate town centres and other
neighbourhoods
• Encourage a level of 'Mixed Use'
• Make the spatial structure more readable by
using visual landmarks etc
The pract ice has requ ired the del ineation and
programming of Zones d' Amenagement Differes'
(formerly Zones d"Extensions de l'Habiiat) and these
are part of the approach taken in Mons.
The third case of the emergence of such mechanisms
is in Ireland, where pursuant to the Planning and
Development Act 2000, towns have been encouraged
to undertake an analysis of their housing markets
and their needs in relation to the availability of sites
in all areas of the town. This has been done in Cork
but not so far in Limerick. These are assisted by new
Guidelines on Residential Density produced in 1999.
In France since 1993 urban complexes have been
required to prepare a Programme locale de L'Habitat.
Attempts to research these and compare them with
the other examples above have been inconclusive
and no clear picture of their use and effectiveness asan instrument in Planning for Housing has been
obtained. This may be due to the fact that they have
been overtaken as tools in this exercise by the
Planning Act of 2000, the SRU, which changes
fundamentally the way in which the planning
mechanism works. Interestingly the policy
objectives set out for the new SRU, are very similar
to those being developed in the UK and Belgium:
• Urban renewal and high density development
rather than peripheral extension
• Cohesion of the policy objectives of all the
agencies operating in the one area
• Sustainability, especially the cohesion of land use
and transport planning
• Public participation in the development of
policies and their application in a given area.
There is thus a clear desire in French urban policy to
foster development in towns rather than to continue
urban sprawl and this underpins policy initiatives
such as the 'Ville Renouvelle' and Politique de la Ville
23
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 25/44
strategies which focus on regeneration. These are
translated into planning documents through the
Schema Directeurs. In the case of Armentieres this is
a metropolitan wide document managed by the
Agence Urbain de l'Urbanisme et d' I'Amenagement du
Territoire du Metropole Lilloise
The German Government in 1998 produced a
guidance document entitled, 'Policies for the
Maintenance and strengthening of Inner Cities ', which
was reinforced by policy guidance at Lander level.
There did not appear to be such national policy
directives in the Netherlands. However this may be
due to the fact that this process is so intrinsically
part of the total planning process that it is not
necessary to isolate it as a separate procedure?
In the case of the Netherlands the National Planning
structure dearly has a predisposition to the
encouragement of development in towns, not least
because there are l imited amounts of rural fringe
land which can be developed.
The analysis of these policy processes revea led a
series of steps which were not all undertaken by all
of the towns, or were taken to different levels bythem.
1. Identifying housing needs in relation to
employment markets and social changes and
quantifying these.
2. Calculating demands for different types of
housing.
3. Identifying site and space availability through
land availability studies
4. Relating these through to even the smaller sites
and vacant premises available in town centres in
Urban Capacity Studies
5. Having processes and mechanisms to match the
needs for housing to the land and space available
and take act ion to ensure development, and not
rely solely on the 'market' or third parties such as
Housing Associations to deliver.
6. Having a programming mechanism for this
delivery
Using the examples we have studied as a proxy for
each national system a s imple matrix reveals the
24
following performance pattern for each of these six
steps. However it must be borne in mind that it
could be argued that every partner did every step to
some degree or other; the objective of the table is to
demonstrate where each has a well used process or
is developing new or innovative ones.
What this analysis does not reveal is the extent to
which the policy statement is backed up by more
forceful measures which di rect ly or indirectly
ensure that the policy can be implemented.
This can be done by strong restrictions on urban
growth which reduce the options to developers to
either conforming with the objectives of recycling
urban land or not building at all.
In many areas developers may prefer the 'not at all'
option to developing in difficult inner sites. There
are no sanctions which can be taken to ensure their
participation and the strategy therefore relies on
public intervention in the land or housing markets
to either assemble sites or build houses themselves
to ensure success. While in the UK local planning
authorities have the ability to assemble land
through its compulso ry purchase powers, this is
seldom done as it is a lengthy and costly processand it is seldom likely to obtain political support
Again the two Irish towns in the study, although
they are now under taking more sophisticated
housing land availability studies, still have no
restriction on out of town development which in the
other towns 'force' developers to look to inner sites.
In France and the Netherlands there is a strong
'Social Housing' sector which can be used and
which the relevant authorities are prepared to use
to develop such sites in the absence of private
interest.
This raises the issue of the relationship of the public
sector and the p riva te sector and how they co-
operate to meet these needs, or not.
3.5 PRIVATE I PUBLIC PARTNERSHIPS
The analysis of the interaction of the Private and the
Public participants in the development of housing,
outlined and analysed in detail in Volume 2b points
to two main areas of contact, in the land market and
Living inTowns:Volume I:Synopsis of Study
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 26/44
STAGE
TOWN 2 3 4 5 6
Limerick , / , /
Cork , / , /
Hampshire , / , / , / , / , / , /
Maidstone , / , / , / , /
Armentie res , / , / , / , /
Mons , / , / , /
Breda , /
Witten , / , /
, / , / indicates particular expertise in this area
, / indicates action in progress
Table 1: Urban Capacity: Pattern of Performance Among Partner Authorities in each of Six Steps
in the f inancing of projects. Howe ver there is also a
need to examine the nature of the types of Agenciesinvolved in the developmen t indus try in these two
areas
In the land market the action taken will often
depend on two sets of factor s, who owns the land
com ing on to the market and the size of the site. In
every study area, or adjacent to it, therewas a mix of
both of these factors .
The di fferences in the process between the towns
was more evident when financing the
redevelopment of such sit es for housing was
examined.Here again there was a mix of sources of
funding , Public most eviden t in France with the
intervention of the State agency the Ca isse des Depots
et Consignations; Mixed and Private more evident in
the other towns.
There were examples where the local authorities,
usually acting within a financial framework
controlled by national governments, were unwilling
to act and left the initiative to the private sector,
Living inTowns:Volume I: Synopsis of Study
even if there was an urgent need for certain types of
housing in the area. In other cases the authoritieswere prepared to take the initiative and could call
on public sources of finance and funding
institutions.
In the social housing sector Maidstone's Registered
Social Landlords are acti vely involved in the
development of affordable homes through the
Council's Social Housing Gran t (SHG) programme
and the Housing Corporation's , Approved
Development Programme (ADP). Investment has
totalled £2.5m over the period 1999-2002 from the
local authority and £4.1m from the SHG funds.
Maidstone Homes Initiative Partnership will also
produce further investment in new homes for key
workers over the next three years. These schemes
are however not rest ricted to the core areas of the
Borough.
In Cork and Limerick, a similar situation pertains in
so far as the desire is for the housing development
process to be dominated by the private sector, bu t all
three towns exist in local economies where the
25
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 27/44
pressure is no t so great as that experienced in
Hampshire. None of these councils are willing to
actively involve th e public sector in a major wa y in
development an d have quite clear financial
constraints to prevent them from doing so. Action is
slow, bu t Limerick have recently begun to take steps
to encourage the occupation of flats over shops by
buying up certain properties to establish 'good title '
an d free up blockages in the process of
development.
The process in Witten has been rather obscure as the
t ow n h as few areas where it can intervene,but there
is considerable doubt t ha t e ve n w he n o wn er s state
that their land is no longer required that the Council
could or w o ul d w is h to purchase it. However there
are some areas of old persons housing where the
public a ut ho ri ti es h av e clearly been willing to
engage in land acquisition. Larger sites such as the
ex-industrial land are more problematic an d the
Council clearly regard it as the responsibility of the
owners to take t he d ev el op me nt of such sites
forward when the time is ripe.
In Belgium, since the 1980's, the Walloon Region has
progressively developed its housing policy
instruments. Urban regeneration operations wereintroduced. Grants were given to communes which
renovated bui ld ings in central areas. These were
focussed on ensuring a mix of residents a nd housing
types as well as th e integration of residential,
commercial uses, green spaces an d parking. This
policy is demonstrated in Mons with th e realisation
of the Quartier Rachot development.
The Netherlands, as exemplified by th e
development of the sites in central Breda ha s a
clearly proactive public sector, bu t one which works
closely with the private investment and
development industries. Most of the sites being
actively promoted in Breda are publicly owned eg
ex-military sites.
Only in Armentieres di d there appear to be a
mechanism an d will for the town to intervene to
acquire private sites an d pu t them in to a process of
development, such as in the Rex Cinema site an d
several ex-factory sites .
26
As can be seen from looking at the process from the
point of view of l an d s up pl y it is difficult to
disentangle this from the question of where the
finance for development is coming from.
In the examples above, there wa s a clear reluctance
for public authorit ies in the UK an d Ireland to use
powers such as Compulsory Purchase to intervene
in what is regarded as an essential ly private area of
action. A similar reluctance wa s noted in Germany,
although the scope for action in the centre of Witten
was limited with few sites being available.
Recent experience in Breda points to a withdrawal
from the housing market by the public authorities.
Although the finance for public or housing
association projects still comes from the national
an d local governments, this has declined in volume
an d more emphasis is no w being pu t on private
sector companies to provide private sector housing.
In Wallonie the provisions of the recent Act give the
municipalities th e powers an d the financ ial
wherewithall to enter the land market an d activate
proposals.
Only in France through the Caisse des Depots, the
Contract system an d mechanisms such as the ZACZone d'Amenagement Concerte, does there seem to be
a system which is geared to intervention to redress
the inaction of the pr iva te development market.
This was being used to good effect in Armentieres as
in the ZAC LeBizet.
AGENCIES
Concerted efforts to ident ify an d categorise the
agencies involved in the process of development
were less than successful. However in all countries
except Ireland the development of 'social housing'
or 'affordable' housing is no w being undertaken by
semi pub lic housing association type agencies:
Registered Social Landlords / HLM's / Housing
Compan ies, etc. The growth of this intermediate
sector has however begun in Ireland although at
present it deals with special needs housing only.
In Germany there is a greater emphasis on the use of
p ri va te l an dl or ds than in any other country.
However in England there have been initiatives, in
the partner towns, to find a role for the private
Living inTowns:Volume I: Synopsis of Sudy
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 28/44
landlord to work with RSLs to provide housing in
town centres. In Belgium a similar in itia tive ha s
involved the direct use of private landlords as
providers of social housing units through th e
medium of 'Agences Immobilieres Sociales ' wh o act
as intermediaries between the privtae landlord an d
the lo w - income tenants.
In every country however independent private
landlordism appears to be in decline.
Only in Ireland is there a rather outdated model of
'Council housing' i.e. direct local authority
provision of social housing. However in a limited
wa y this type of management has been us ed to help
b ri ng u n us ed t ow n centre space back into use.
In the pr iva te sector there aga in appears to be a
reluctance of major housing developers to tackle the
development of anything bu t th e larger an d
uncomplicated sites for rented or owner-occupied
apartments. The only area where this is a major
feature of in- town housing d ev el op me nt w as in
Hampshire an d to a minor extent in Maidstone.
(where there has been increased willingness by
developers to redevelop 'brownfield ' sites in th e
town centre).
In Ireland there have been numerous examples of
such developments within designated Urban
Renewal Areas which have benefit ed from tax
incentives to bui ld more housing for rent in town
centres. Where the larger p ri va te i nv es tm en t
companies operated best was in the commercial
market where ancillary flat development might be
part of th e scheme, such as in Breda.
3.6 FINANCIAL AND FISCAL POLICY IN THE
PROCESS
The fiscal an d financial investment contexts within
which the process of residential repopulation of
central areas is undertaken has been examined by
asking ho w do national policies an d programmes
for financial management and taxation etc affect the
direction of investment to town centres.
The clearest example of such fiscal incentives comes
from Ireland. The full details of the tax incentive
scheme are given in Volume 2b bu t in summary the
Living in Towns:Volume I: Synopsis of Study
1994 scheme, which ha s no w been modified, give a
tax break to investors wh o construct residential
property in the core areas of Irish cities. There are
several major schemes in Limerick, an d fewer bu t
more strategically located schemes in Cork
Incentives have also been available for schemes to
bring redundant flats over shops back into use. In
Cork the 'Living over the Business ' scheme has been
derive d from this national initiative.
Between 1991 an d 1994 the Government in England
established a fund to assist schemes to convert
empty spaces above shops to residential purposes.
This ha d limited effect in Ma idstone an d the
Hampshire towns studied. Thus in the 2001 budget
in th e United Kingdom tax incen tives for th e
development of potentia l residential space were
introduced bu t it is too early to state whether this
will have profound or negligeable effect.
There are also measures in France which ca n be used
to improve town centre property. The most recent
were the measures under the 'Besson scheme' which
enables owners to set their construction costs to
provide private rental accommodation against their
tax liability.
Also under the aegis of the Agence Naiionale pour
l'Amelioration de l'Habitat, ANAH, grants are given to
individuals an d through the Operation Public de
l'Amelioraiion de l'Habiiat, OPAH to local HLM's in
specific areas to refurbish or renovate housing.
3.7 MANAGEMENT STYLE
In addressing this matter four related quest ions
arose.
The first arose from the experience of the team in
e xa mi ni ng t he wa y in w hi ch Au th or it ies w er e
proactive or reactive in their approach to
redevelopment an d enhancement of their core
urban areas. Although public finance wa s
constra ined to a greater or lesser extent in each of
the study towns, the evidence suggests that in some
cases the lack of political will wa s as much a barrier
to act ion as the lack of the resources to act.
The second aspect to be examined w as w hether the
27
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 29/44
emphasis in approach reflected the style of
government at local level. In both the French and
German examples there was a clear directional style
led by the Mayor of both towns and symptomatic of
the government process in each country. This
contrasted with the politicised council and technical
officer led model in England.
The third related to the interactionbetween different
departments and professions in their responsibility
and level of cooperation in the revitalisation of town
centres.
A vexed question was the role of Town Centre
Managers in the total process and their relationship
to other officers. In Cork, Maidstone and
particularly in Mons, new Town Centre Managers
are making a vital contribution to the revitalisation
of the Core area. However their focus is s light ly
different from that of the Technical officers of the
authority in that they tended to represent the
private sector, retailers, office companies etc.
The team acknowledge the va lue of a Town Centre
Manager (TCM) and the contribution they can make
in the totality of tools used, and their role in putting
private sector interes ts into the process. HoweverTCM is no t the total answer and over dynamism in
this field can lead to conflict between or to a lack of
cohesion in approaches. The answer lies in having
focussed and strong strategic and integrated goals
for the town which can direct this new energy and
cont ribut ion into a process which has beneficial
effects on all the actors engaged in the process. This
returns the issue to the actors at the helm and makes
it incumbent on them to see that this process of
giving coherence to the total range of initiatives
takes place.
In Witten the process of Town Marketing, the
German equivalent of TCM, was clearly directed by
the Mayors's office and gave a clear framework for
the other actors. I t is not restricted to the promotion
of private sector interests bu t is widely drawn to
bring private and public initiatives together. Thus
the promotion of the image of the town is aimed at
enhancing both the commercial and residential
sectors. As part of this, strategies for the upgrading
of housing which has become sub standard by
28
contemporary standards have been initiated to keep
population in the town itself.
In France the emergence of the Mayor - manager,
r ather than the traditional Mayor - 'notable ' is
giving a boost to a more professional organisation in
the Mairie. There was clear evidence of this
emerging in Armentieres.
In other cases particularly in England there has been
a lack of coordination between departments at local
level, Le. between housing and planning
departments. However the climate here is changing
as the briefs for each department have evolved. For
instance in the housing field the role of the Housing
department is no longer just to manage local
authori ty housing stock, but to think more
strategically about the totality of housing provision
and to ensure the delivery of much of it. As a result
they have to develop closer links to the Planning
department to whom the question of housing
supply in all its facets has become a central question.
Equally agencies concerned with transport, public
and private are being drawn into a wider debate on
the total quality and sustainibility of the town
environment; in fact the entire issue of 'urban
living'.
However in France and the Netherlands such
interaction has been a long standing feature of the
total planning process.
At a major policy level there clearly has to be some
rethinking of traditional processes of town
management, competences and roles, to enable
Authorities tomove intomore modern management
modes
The final area of concern in the management of
development relates to the integration of policy
between different levels of government.
This is at its most complex in France where there are
5 levels of government which can contribute to the
formulation and delivery of any s trategy for
housing development, bu t where there is a high
level of consultation and integration at work. In the
case of Armen ti eres the several levels can be
significant in the entire process from policy
Living inTowns:Volume I: Synopsisof Study
r :.
t ; . ' .
.. ~
.. . ::
0.· .. .:
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 30/44
formulation to delivery.
In England a similar bu t as yet less well integrated
hierarchy exists and which may be further extended
by the development of regional agencies from the
current Government Offices for the regions. In the
Netherlands there is a clear 3 level structure where
the policies and plans are integrated for the
planning and development of land.
In the case of Germany there are three levels and in
Belgium and Ireland only two of significance. The
simple matrix set ou t below shows this variety.
A full list of all agencies and their functions is given
in the Volumes 2b, bu t the complexity of
government structures in France is particularly
notable with England a close second. This is
explained by the paral le ling of agencies in France
with central Government offices being 'shadowed'
by locally representative assemblies at virtually
every level.
Thus it can be seen that in every case there are a
large number of agencies involved requiring co
ordination in 3 dimensions before a scheme can be
delivered.
• Between Private and Public agencies
• Within public agencies horizontally
• Vertically within the public sector
The message from Armentieres and Witten is that
the co-ordination needed and the delivery on behalf
of the Town itself seems to be better achieved where
there is clear directive control from a Mayor 's office
rather than the hope that the myriad agencies will
work cohesively by consultation.
Germany France Nethertands Belgium England Ireland
National ./ ./ . / . /
Regional ./ .1./ . I . /
County Department ././ ./ ./
Metro Urban ./ . /
Local Authority./ . / . / . / . / . I
Commune
. / . / In France, at both Regional and Departmental levelthere are two types of goverment body: one representing
the State, the other representing the local electorate.
Table 2: Levels of Goverment in each Country
Living inTowns:Volume I: Synopsis of Study 29
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 31/44
30 Living inTowns:Volume I:Synopsis of S udy
"
-r -. ,
, :.. .. . ...
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 32/44
Practice
Within the policy contexts set out above the Partner
author it ies under took a series of actions, some in
direct re sponse to the policy framework and
guidance, as outl ined in section 3, others on their
own initiative but within the ir competences to
enhance their town as a place to live. The aim of this
section is to communicate this level of act ivity and
to pinpoint areas where there have been particular
examples of 'Good Practice' by the Municipal
Authorities
4.1 POLICIES IN TOWN CENTRES
The decline in the vitality of the core areas on thetowns has led in every case to the production of
specific planning policies for their revitalisation in
recent years. Only Armentieres, the smallest of the
study towns, where the central area is difficult to
delimit from the rest of the town, had no specific
area plan. It did however have distinct proposals for
the area as part of the overall POS for the town.
A clear point of difference was the extent to which
the local authori ties were prepared to follow up
their plan policies into implementive action.
In Cork, Limerick, Hampshi re and Maidstone,
public action was limited to those areas where the
public authorities had a s ta tutory duty to fulfil.
Other areas of action in the domain of private
landowners were left to the private sector, although
there were a few notable exceptions such as the
Fremlins Brewery redevelopment in Maidstone. The
town centre strategies were therefore intended to
enhance the attractiveness of the core area for
private investment.
Living inTowns:Volume I:Synopsis of Study
section 4
This is most evident in the Hampshire Town Centre
Strategywhich places much emphasis on facilitating
and providingframeworks for private sector action. It
seems to stop short of action such as compulsory
purchase and joint action with the private sector. A
good example is the development of the Pirelli
factory site in Eastleigh. This site will provide
housing and some ancillary use and be
programmed for development by private agencies
over a 10 year period. The public role seems to be
limited to attempting to assure the delivery of some
affordable housing within an agreed 'Design Brief'.
A contrast is the development of an industrial
wasteland in Armentieres where the municipalityhas purchased the site and is di recting the ent ire
development, thereby assuring the delivery of social
housing
URBAN DESIGN
At the outset this was not felt to be an important
aspect of the project and it did not feature in the
original objectives of the Project as a factor.
However it became clea r that as the analysis
progressed its impor tance became more evident .
The attractiveness of a town as a place to live can be
enhanced if the qual ity of the environment is
constantly improving and it is a major planning
objective to achieve this.
A key element of such policies is to ensure that any
new buildings inserted into the core areas be of the
highest standard. Equally, in its normal programme
of works to improve the efficiency of the area if a
council is mindful of Design, a great deal can be
done to achieve such an enhancement. Thus things
such as stree t furniture and s treet art , paving,
31
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 33/44
lighting, advertising, green spaces, cleaning and
anti-litter initiatives, shop signs and landscaping
are all contributory elements which can be
upgraded to make the inner areas of any town, not
just historic towns, more invit ing, safer and
enjoyable. A survey of the policies and practices of
this type in the study towns revealed that all of them
had begun to introduce guides or to take on
personnel who were skilled at this form of design
work.
The most noteworthy examples seen by the group
were:
a) The Georgian area of Limerick
This is the core of Irish Town bu t has become
extremely run down as the commercial core has
spread into it and it has had to adapt to traffic and
servicing. However the City Council now has
schemes in hand to improve it and to ensure the
enhancement of it as an area of historic character.
Some sites such as Perry Square are already being
refurbished by private voluntary effort and little by
little the area is becoming pleasanter.
b) The High Street area of Cork
This is the site of the scheme which won the RTPIannual Planning Award in 1999. Despi te much
urban degradation in and around the area the
scheme has shown what can be done by a
combination of public facilitation of private action,
public housing strategy and private investment to
restore such areas.
c) HampshireTown Centre Appraisal
This is a guidance document bu t it provides a
framework for all the towns in the County to work
with the private landowners and investors toenhance their character and liveability. Eastleigh is a
good example of this scheme and the shopping
centre has been much improved by more cheerful
and coherent design which also links the
surrounding res idential areas in to the town centre
more sympathetically.
d) Breda Canal Restoration Scheme
This is a scheme to restore some of the old canals of
the city which had been fil led in. In doing so traffic
will be reduced and the environment will be
32
enhanced. This will most certainly make living in
the city centre more pleasant.
e) Witten Street Improvements
In conjunction with the enhancement of the tram
links to Bochum, the City Council has remodelled
the streetscape of Bahnhofstrasse the main
shopping street. This is to be linked into the
redes ign of the Town hall square. There has been
considerable public deba te abou t this and no
scheme agreeable to everyone has yet been
approved. There is however a tremendous
commitment to the enhancement of the urban
environment to make Wit ten one of the more
liveable of the Ruhr towns.
f) Maidstone Streetscape Manual
Maidstone has adopted a programme of
improvements to the town centre streetscape,
including improving signage and other street
furniture. In addition the council has been working
with the Civic Trust to produce a 'Streetscape
Manual' .
In Maidstone the streetscape of the high street is
being renovated and it is expected that the new
development at the Old Fremlin's Brewery site,which may now have a residential element, will
enhance the at tract iveness of this important area
between the core and the station. As part of the
development proposals there are plans to build a
public square outside the north entrance to the
building.
In Mons, the main focus of attention is the redesign
of the surrounding Boulevard on the line of the old
walls. Here the renovation of the 'Machine a Eau ' and
remnants of the old walls are some of the schemesthat will enhance this ring and re integrate the areas
around the town centre into it in a more cohesive
way.
The Ville d'Armentieres has excit ing plans for the
redesign of the two squares, currently parking lots,
at the core of the town and facing the splendid Hotel
de Ville. Also the enti re area around the Station, in
itself an attractive building, and the streets linking it
to the main square , will be renovated and
redes igned to give an enti re ly different feel to the
Living inTowns:Volume I:Synopsis of Study
,. -
'.:
",
. , .. ....
" ." ' .
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 34/44
core of the town.
Indeed a particular focus for the introduction of an
urban design initiative is in such station areas.
Traditionally these have been neglected and are
often rather seedy. However in Armentieres,
Maidstone, Cork, Witten and Breda, redevelopment
of the station or adjacent areas has given the Local
Authority the opportunity to enhance and redesign
this critical area of town. The effect of having a
pleasant 'entrance way' is important to the entire
experience of a place.
It was clear that every town had begun a process of
environmental and design improvements.
At a smaller scale evidence of restoration schemes
for individual buildings or the attention paid to the
design of the new has also contributed.
Some examples of note are:
• The Haus Witten Music Centre in Witten; an
outstanding reconstruction of an old chateau
• Cruises Hotel in Limerick; a very sensitive
introduction to the urban fabric
• The rehabilitation of houses and offices and shops
in central Mons
A final major design problem which all the towns
face is the reestablishment of independent access to
the upper stories of shops or offices in the core
commercial areas. In schemes in Cork attempts have
been made to overcome this by opening rear access
and using existing alley way entrances. This is a
critical if apparently small aspect of bringing much
of the 'lost' space back into use .
SAFETY
The question of safety was also an important
consideration in view of a perceived belief that
personal safety was at risk in such areas,
particularly at night. Crime figures were sought, bu t
due to the way in which the y were collected and
classified by Police Forces, could not shed any clear
light on this view. However some towns had
anecdotal evidence of areas or times of the day in
which crime was a par ticular problem and were
actively taking steps to counter it.
Living inTowns:Volume I: Synopsisof Sudy
In Arment ieres there is a scheme, 'Agents Locaux de
Mediation Sociale', where special wardens patrol the
streets to give assistance and resolve problems
among the inhabitants . A s imilar scheme was
introduced by the Town Centre Management
scheme in Mons.
Maidstone has a lready instituted a Town Centre
CCTV system which has proved highly effective. It
has proved useful in deterring late evening
rowdiness and in-store theft, and so far there has
been no reaction against it locally. Other towns were
considering the introduction of such a system.
It did however give rise to questions concerning, for
example, the Civil Rights of people being
photographed without the ir consent and the
possibility of whether it only caused displacement
of 'cr ime' to other less policed areas. There were
clear reservations as to the scheme by the French
and German partners on the project.
TRANSPORT POLICIES
As with urban design, no great emphasis was given
to this factor in the initial project design, bu t at the
first meeting in Maidstone it became clear that it
was a vital aspect of the experience of a town forresidents and visitors alike. Transport policies are
part of the strategy for the town in each of our study
areas.
In general there was a divide in emphasis between
the continental and ' island' towns on the balance to
be struck between public transport and the
accommodation of the car. In Mons, Breda, Witten
and Armentieres the accent was on the
enhancement of public transport and in the
management of streets and accessibility to maximise
its use. The use of the minibus service to traverse the
core of Mons was noteworthy and could provide a
model for other towns.
As might be expected bicycles were a feature of
Breda, BUT were properly catered for by the
provision of a thorough network of cycle ways and
secure cycle parks. Witten was also experimenting
with a cycle renting scheme based in the main
rai lway station. The lessons for other towns are
there to be copied.
33
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 35/44
In Witten the enhancement of the tramway
infrastructure is central to both the residential and
commercial strategy of the town council. The
improvements to the railway connections to
Dortmund are central to the traffic strategy of the
town, as are those proposed between Armentieres
and Lille. The improvements to the connections
from Breda to the new TCV system linking it to
Rotterdam and Antwerp were the catalyst to the
improvements of the railway station area.
In the Hampshi re towns and in Maids tone, there
was a recognition of the need to manage car access
and reduce its impact on the central core areas but it
was still a major objective of policy to provide good
car access . This was particularly true of Maidstone
which felt itself to be in commercial competi tion
with the Bluewater Shopping Centre which has
good car accessibility and extensive free car
parking. The council therefore operates an
extremely well used 'Park and Ride ' system which
provides over 2000 free car parking spaces. Cork
equally, while espousing better public transport had
a pol icy of trying to enhance car access.
The effects of this on liveabil ity were difficult to
assess, as none of the towns had 'Ca r Free'initiatives for old or new residential areas.
HOUSING IMPROVEMENT
Quite apart from the issue of whether the authorities
wished to enhance urban living or notwas the issue
of what had been done to date to improve the
existing stock of housing in the town centres.
Although derelict premises were found in most
study towns, there also appeared to be policies
already in hand to tackle this. Rehabilitation
programmes were central to this. Here there was agreat deal of commonality in the approach, and all
towns had policies and programmes to encourage
the private owner, whether landlord or owner-
occcupier, to improve existing premises.
4.2 LAND ASSEMBLY AND MANAGEMENT
This review revealed a considerable dynamism in
the evolution of practice, for example there have
been great s tr ides in the development of urban
housing strategies, particularly in Cork and in the
UK. However there were no examples where the
34
process was carried out in an exemplary fashion
In the English Towns the 'Urban Capacity' studies,
if extended to include inner small sites and spaces
would be a valuable mechanism. However this did
no t extend to the development of a delivery
mechanism in response to need. Thus some social
housing landlords could follow it up bu t it would be
on their initiative; equally in the private sector the
implementation was left to the private market. Thus
a balanced response to perceived need, and the
redevelopment of inner town space was matter of
chance rather than design. The land availability and
space availabil ity assessment mechanisms are
however commendable in that they are now being
extended to assess need .
In Hampshire and Maidstone there has been a
growing realisation that there are categories of
'essential workers' which find it diff icult to afford
housing in their areas. These however go beyond
the traditional public sector workers such as
policemen, nurses, teachers to include other even
lower paid workers such as shop assistants, cleaners
etc who have been priced ou t of the area. This has
led Hampshire County Counci l to undertake a
study of 'housing need' seen from a labour marketpoint of view, as a prerequisite of the 'Urban
Capacity Study'.
The Irish land availability studies are also
commendable, and the Cork study has been
circulated to Project partners. However this needs
to extend more towards the assessment of need and
the delivery of the required housing beyond the
now reduced tax exemption mechanisms. In
Limerick there have been strategic interventions to
activate the land market through 'back to back' land
deals, where the City council has stepped in to
purchase and sell on land which was not being
brought into development. This was in part due to
the need to establish 'Good Title' where ownership
records had been destroyed or lost in historic
upheavals.
The Mons process, the Zonesd 'Amenagement Differe'
(ZAD), in the 'Schema de Structure' covered much
of what was discovered in England and Ireland bu t
also included a programming mechanism which
Living inTowns:Volume I: Synopsis of Study
"
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 36/44
was unique and worthy of replication. This
consisted of the arranging of specific sites in a
sequence ofwhen their development was desired to
accord with the other policies especially transport in
the Schema.
There was no clear mechanism evident in either
Breda or Witten although some parts of the process
were covered.
As part of the projec t the team attempted to
undertake 'space vacancy studies' in each town
centre bu t this did not prove attainable in every
town within the time. Only Armentieres made a
serious attempt at it and in Maidstone it was felt to
be premature in view of the impending 'Urban
Capacity Study ' in to which it would be
incorporated. However in meetings with Partners
and in visiting the towns even bringing this fact to
the attention of those acting in these areas was
instructive and the idea of surveying 'minispaces'
will add to the range of assessment techniques for a
better analysis of urban dynamics.
The process in Armentieres was however
particularly unique. The identif icat ion of sites for
redevelopment was highly developed. There was a
s trong emphasis on delivery with financialavailability through State funding based in the
Caisse des Depots and the 'Contract ' system. This
did not however appear to be based in any strong
housing need or strategy. The absence of thismay be
due to the fact that the metropolitan PLH was being
rethought and the town has worked in a vacuum in
this strategic issue for some time.
This may change as the new planning system may
provide a framework for a more process based
approach. This can be based on the thorough review
which has been undertaken by the Metropolitan
agency, the 'Agence de Deoelopmeni et d'Urbanisme de
Lille Metropole, which has recently published its
review of the 1999 census and its Tableau de Bard de
L'Habitat.
4.3 FINANCE AND INVESTMENT
There were few examples of local financial
init iatives, probably reflect ing the strict l imits on
local public spending. Indeed the town of Witten is
particularly bereft of resources. This makes it very
Living inTowns:Volume I: Synops is of Study
difficult for local agencies and mayors of
municipal it ies to ini tiate ideas without pinning
them to higher level plans. However in Breda there
is a scheme which is locally funded to restore
residential premises in buildings where the facades
could be restored as part of the conservation processof the historic core of the town; this is linked to a
local Living over theShop' scheme.
A similar system existed in Armentieres where the
Chamber of Commerce and the Town Council
jointly provide low interest loans for the
refurbishment of shop fronts. This can be used to
make those buildings partly used for retail activities
more attractive, thus making the potential
residential accommodation above more marketable.
There has been some examinat ion of the effect of
rent levels on investment in core area housing bu t
not enough has been discovered from which a clear
judgement can be made . There is a requi rement to
keep a regis ter of rents and to ensure that they do
not become excessive in WiUen, and i ndeed all
partners have some form of fair rent, but not
controlled rent, policy. The effect on the
marketability of accommodation is not evident.
4.4 COORDINATION OF AGENCIES AND
STRATEGIES
In every partner authority there was a plethora of
departments, agencies and professionals working
on one aspect or another of the town centre or core
area strategies; nowhere exhibited a clear model to
follow.
The challenge in effective co-ordination was most
evident where there was a 'Technical' rather than a
'Political' lead to s trategy. Thus in Mons an
emphasis was pu t on the need to increase co
ordination between the planning department, the
needs of the housing section and the commercial
revitalisation objectives of the Town Centre
Manager. In Cork and Maidstone similar tensions
occurred. In the latter the TCM office wish to extend
their brief to include tourism. In Limerick planning
and housing strategies were caught up in a Town
versus County strategy debate. Hampshire towns
and Breda seemed to have the best working
arrangements. However the team was impressed by
35
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 37/44
the models in Armentieres and Witten where in the
nature of local administration the role of the town
mayor's office in formulating and implementing
housing strategies as part of the tota l town strategy
wa s crucial. In both, although there were ev ident
differences of objective among different professional
groups, there was a clear steer to the resolution of
any conflicts and the del ive ry of projects. This
model has much to commend it, although there is
the danger that political considerations ma y
outweigh sound technical advice.
4.5 PROGRAMMING
A major factor to be taken in to account was the
difficulty of knitting together the various
programmes of the different professional groups
and levels of government department, never mind
the different imperatives of the private sector. This
may be much of the reason for the tension between
planners and town centre managers. The planning
process is by its consultative nature long and time
consuming. An intervention by an essentially
private sector led body has often a more immediate
target.
However the achievement of some amelioration of
town centre living conditions may take time. TheZAD system in Mons has within it the germ of a
solution in that the programming idea, if it were
extended to include TCM needs and the city core,
could do much to improve this mechanism and
provide a model for other partners and countries.
4.6 PUBLIC PERCEPTION OF URBAN LIV ING
Hampshire County Council is to be commended for
starting in to the analysis of what people at large
think of their towns and trying to discern what
attracts and repels potential inhabitants.
The su rvey raises the issue of negat ive image and
factors such as parking, noise, safety, facilities and
the general environment and comes to conclusions
on the general importance of these to inhab itant s
and how t he pub lic autho rit ies might address
concerns in order to enhance the attractiveness of
their town centres as places to live.
Their study has already been circulated around the
partnership and is summarised in Volume 2a.
36
In Maidstone and Cork tentative steps have been
taken to pursue this sort of inquiry. We consider
that, based on the Hampshire example, a more
rigorous survey mechanism could be developed
and tested in the partner towns and in others.
Living inTowns:Volume I: Synopsis of Study
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 38/44
section 5
General Objectives and Conclusions
The Objectives of the Study within the INTERREG
lIe programme have been set out at the beginning of
the Report . The team believe that these have been
achieved to a large extent and the nature of the
factors control ling the level and type of in town
living exposed and compared.
It is clear that in all partner authorities the desire to
restore their Inner areas as part of the general urban
strategy is strong and that all are engaged in
development of s trategies to under take this. The
study has been a vehicle for the exchange of this
information and has been a conduit for discussions
betweea-.fowns at a more detailed level than isgenerally experienced in the INTERREG
programme. They are however vital constituents of
the urban fabric and their vitality is critical to
achieving the 'balanced system of urban and rural
population distribution etc'.
It is cleat .that no one Town or Country had all the
answers to the problems of the decline and
revitalisation of urban areas and how to induce a
stable repopulat ion of them. However each had
something unique to contribute and which
interested others. . During the Steering Group
meetings which enabled visits to be made to each
country in the project, copious notes were made and
unending questions stimulated.
In a ttempting to enhance the transfer of ideas the
following table has been drawn up to demonstrate
what 'good practice' has been identified and which
towns and by definition, countries might benefit
from absorbing these into their urban policy. I t had
been intended to attempt to identi fy the barriers
Living inTowns:Volume I:Synopsis of Study
which might prevent this and make suggestions as
to how these might be overcome bu t there has not
been sufficient time to permit more than a cursory
analysis of this.
To amplify this the team noted the following areas
where the practice or the policy context in one
partner attracted the interest of the others as it
provided a different model and a fount of ideas for
innovation in their own practice.
At the building or block level considerable interest
was shown in ways to open up space at upper levels
and improve access generally. This wasdemonstrated best in Cork and Mons. At the more
general town centre scale, every town was engaged
in enhancement works and there was a wealth of
design initiatives to examine and copy. The way in
which the tramway had been integrated into the
town core in Witten, the restoration of Georgian
premises in Limerick, refurbishment of North Main
Street in Cork, the Chasse park scheme in Breda,
Quart ier Rachot in Mons, the plans for the Station
area in Armentieres, and a variety of smaller
initiatives in the English towns were of special note.
In the integration of transport into the urban
structure in a sympathetic way the minibus service
in Mons and the cycleways of Breda provided ideas
for better management in the other towns.
Safety was a concern to all towns and although
several were engaged in introducing methods of
enhancing this, it was possible to see how one
approach by adopting CCTV would operate and the
effect it had in the system currently opera ting in
37
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 39/44
AUTHORITY POLICY TO EXPORT IMPORTING
(National Example) AGENCY
Hampshire • Public Perception Analysis All others
• Urban Capacity / Needs Analysis All non UK
Maidstone • Urban Capacity Study Methodology All others
• CCTV Scheme in Town Centre All non UK
Armentie res • Financing of Development UK -Ireland
(France)
Cork • Land Availability All others
(Ireland)
Ireland • Fiscal Incentives to Renting All others
Mons • Programming of Land Release All others
(Wallonie) • Co-ordination of InternalDepartments and other Agencies such
as Town Centre Management
• Town Centre Transport System
Breda • Cycleways and Managed Cycle All others
Parking
• Integrated Town Planning and All others
Housing Processes
Witten • Town Centre Transport System All others
South Bank LINT • Small Space Analysis
Team
Table 3: Major Areas of Transferable Policy and Practice
BARRIERS
None evident
Considerable in
Treasury
National Treasuries
Maidstone. The 'Police de Proximite' scheme in
Arrnentieres also attracted interes t as an innovative
programme. This was closely related to the problem
of a general negative public perception of town
centres and the study of this undertaken by
Hampshire provided a template for the other
partners to begin to analyse this and devise
responses to deal with their own local situation.
In the process of planning for housing development
there was evidence of an increase in the
commitment of local authorities to develop more
rigorous and more comprehensive processes to
undertake this. Although the new policy guidelines
in England were perhaps the most comprehensive
they were being replicated by similar processes in
other countries some of which were stronger in the
practice of certain parts of the total process. These
have been detailed previously bu t the Project team
38
considered that examining the extent to which these
processes could be integrated and implemented in
all situations was worthy of a pilot practical project.
By doing so the potential for the transferability of
the best practice, English needs and market analysis ,
Irish and English land and space availabil i ty
studies, French financing, Irish tax regimes, Belgian
programming mechanisms, could be tested in a
practical situation.
A final area where there were clear messages to be
transferred was in the analysis of the processes of
management of the various functions of a 'town
council ' and the degree of cohesion and direction
which was imparted to this process. Here there was
clear evidence that although the enhancement of
communications between all the actors engaged in
the process of town centre improvement was
gathering pace in every study authori ty, it had
Living inTowns:Volume I: Synopsis of Study
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 40/44
proceeded fastest and with the most effect where
there was clear integra tion of the political and
technical inputs through one office and one person.
This was clearly the case in Armentieres and Witten
where the elected Mayors saw it as their role to
drive their towns forward and deliver a better
environment for everyone. This merely underlined
the fact that the necessary catalyst to change in the
perception and experience of our towns as places to
live is the will, almost a hunger, to achieve it.
One of the by products of the project has been a
series of unintended consequences which may
produce results which extend beyond the strict
confines of the project objectives.
In making contact with other European towns with
roughly similar problems, the partner towns have
opened up perspectives on not only the subject of
the study bu t also other aspects of their daily
agenda of tasks which may also yield ideas on
policy development of benefit. The network is open
and can be used by the partner towns in future to
seek information and explore initiatives.
Living inTowns:Volume I: Synopsis of Study 39
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 41/44
40 Living inTowns:Volume I: Synopsis of Study
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 42/44
ProjectTeam and Partners
PROJECT TEAMSouth Bank University
Faculty of the Built Environment
202Wandsworth Road
London SW8 2JZ
England
Professor Barry Redding
Tel: +44 (0)20 78157319
Email: reddinbg@sbu .ac.uk
Charles Fraser
Tel: +44 (0)20 7815 7302
Email: [email protected]
Lament Le Ny
Tel: +44 (0)20 7815 7365
Email: [email protected]
Fax: +44 (0)20 7815 7350
Gundrun Lawlor
Ben Smith
PARTNERS
Ville d'Armentieres
Region Nord-Pas-de-Calais, France
Contacts: Ms Sandrine Lebleu
Email: [email protected]
Mr Christophe Cousin
Email: ch [email protected]
The Netherlands Institute of Tourism and
Transport Studies, NHTV
In conjunction with the City of Breda,Netherlands
Contact: Ms Sandra Sijbers
Email: [email protected]
Living inTowns:Volume I: Synopsis of Sudy
appendix
The City of Cork Corporation
Republic of Ireland
Contacts: Ms Ann Bogan
Email: corkplan@ioLie
Ms Fiona Macsharry
Email: [email protected]
Hampshire County Council
England
Contact: Ms Amanda Gregory
Email: [email protected]
The City of Limerick Corporation
Republic of IrelandContacts: Mr Richard Tobin
Email: [email protected]
Ms Elena Suteu
Email: [email protected]
Maidstone Borough Council
Kent, England
Contacts: Mr Richard Powell
Email: [email protected]
Ms Jill Rae
Email: [email protected]
Ville de Mons
Wallonia, Belgium
Contact: Ms Ariane Akaki
Email: [email protected]
StadtWitten
North Rhine Westphalia, Germany
Contact: Mr Klaus Volkel
Email: [email protected]
41
8/3/2019 Living in Towns: Volume 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/living-in-towns-volume-1 43/44
42 Living inTowns:Volume I: Synopss of Study