Live Cattle Evaluation

22
Live Cattle Evaluation

description

Live Cattle Evaluation. What are we trying to determine?. Quality grade Yield grade Dressing percentage. Quality Grade Factors. Maturity. Marbling. Beef Quality Grading Factors -- Maturity --. Estimation of physiological age Classifications: A B C D E (young to old) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Live Cattle Evaluation

Page 1: Live Cattle Evaluation

Live Cattle Evaluation

Page 2: Live Cattle Evaluation

What are we trying to determine?

Quality grade Yield grade Dressing percentage

Page 3: Live Cattle Evaluation

Quality Grade Factors

Maturity Marbling

Page 4: Live Cattle Evaluation

Beef Quality Grading Factors-- Maturity --

Estimation of physiological age Classifications: A B C D E (young to old) determined by degree of bone ossification most fed cattle = A maturity (< 30 mo of age) As age , QG

Page 5: Live Cattle Evaluation

Bone Maturity

Thoracic CartilagenousVertebrae

Bone Maturity

Thoracic CartilagenousVertebrae

Page 6: Live Cattle Evaluation

Bone Maturity

Thoracic CartilagenousVertebrae

Bone Maturity

Thoracic CartilagenousVertebrae

Page 7: Live Cattle Evaluation

Chronological Age of Cattle

30 42 72 96

A B C D E

FeedlotCattle

Young Cows Older Cows

Hei

fere

ttes

Page 8: Live Cattle Evaluation

Beef Quality Grading Factors-- Marbling --

Measure of the intramuscular fat fat within the muscle “taste” fat

Page 9: Live Cattle Evaluation
Page 10: Live Cattle Evaluation

PRIME

CHOICE

SELECT

STANDARD

COMMERCIAL

UTILITY

CUTTER

Sl. Abundant

Moderate

Modest

Small

Slight

Traces

Practically Devoid

AA BB CC DD EE

Page 11: Live Cattle Evaluation

Beef Yield Grades

Measure of cutability or the percent yield of boneless, closely trimmed retail cuts from the:

chuck rib loin round

Wholesale Cuts from the BeefCarcass

Page 12: Live Cattle Evaluation

Interconversion of YG and the % of Boneless, Closely

Trimmed Retail Cuts

Yield Grade % Retail Cuts

1 54.6

2 52.3

3 50.0

4 47.7

5 45.4

% lean (muscle), % fat

% lean (muscle), % fat

Page 13: Live Cattle Evaluation

Factors Used to Calculate Beef Yield Grades

Fat over ribeye (in) FOE % kidney, pelvic, heart fat KPH

of the carcass weight Ribeye Area (in2) REA Hot carcass weight HCW

As HCW , REA must

Page 14: Live Cattle Evaluation

Fat thickness

3/4 length of Ribeye

Measurement of FOE

Page 15: Live Cattle Evaluation

Measurement of REA

Page 16: Live Cattle Evaluation

Dressing Percentage

Used as a basis for marketing livestock beef

Usage and importance as the industry moves toward “value-based” marketing. As fat , dressing percentage but YG less desirable (poor cutability)

Page 17: Live Cattle Evaluation

Dressing Percentage

= hot carcass weight

live pay weight 100

Example: If live weight = 1200 lbs HCW = 750 lbs

100 = 62.5%cattle

1200

750

Page 18: Live Cattle Evaluation

Dressing Percentage

Example: If live weight = 1200 lbs DP = 65%

1200 X .65 = 780 lb HCW

Page 19: Live Cattle Evaluation

Beef Dressing Percent

Fed Cattle = 63% Cows = 50% Factors that affect dressing percentage

“Fill” -- large rumen capacity fat cover -- fat animals have higher dress mud on the hide -- add live weight, reduce dress

Page 20: Live Cattle Evaluation

Carcass Evaluation of Beef Beef quality grading factors (2)

associated quality grades Beef yield grading factors (4)

associated yield grades Dressing Percent

factors importance for valuation of beef

Key Points: The Beef Industry

Page 21: Live Cattle Evaluation

How do our customers value our product?

High

Low

Page 22: Live Cattle Evaluation

How do we value our

customers?High

Low