LIST OF REFERENCES - University of Floridaplaza.ufl.edu/yildiztr/YILDIZ1/ref.doc · Web...

38
LIST OF REFERENCES Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J.P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Journal 78, 465-483. Allen, P., Swain, M., Harley, B., & Cummins, J. (1990). Aspects of classroom treatment: Toward a more comprehensive view of second language education. In B.Harley, P.Allen, J. Cummins & M.Swain (Eds.), Development of second language proficiency, (pp.16-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Almasi, J.F. (1995). The nature of fourth graders’ sociocognitive conflicts in peer-led and teacher-led discussions of literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 30 (3), 314-351. Almasi, J.F., & Gambrell, L.B. (1994). Sociocognitive conflict in peer-led and teacher-led discussions of literature (Research Report No. 12). Athens, GA: University of Maryland and Georgia, National Reading Research Centre. Alvermann, D.E., O’Brian, D.G., & Dillon, D.R. (1990). What teachers do when they say they’re having discussions of content area reading assignments: A qualitative analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 25 (4), 296-322. Alvermann, D. E. (2000). Researching libraries, literacies, and lives: A rhizoanalysis. In W. Pillow (Ed.), Working the ruins: Feminist poststructuralist theory and methods in education, (pp. 114-129). New York, NY: Routledge. Alvermann, D.E. (1995/1996). Peer-led discussions: Whose interests are served? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 39, 282-289. 193

Transcript of LIST OF REFERENCES - University of Floridaplaza.ufl.edu/yildiztr/YILDIZ1/ref.doc · Web...

Page 1: LIST OF REFERENCES - University of Floridaplaza.ufl.edu/yildiztr/YILDIZ1/ref.doc · Web viewContrastive rhetoric and second language learning: Notes toward a theory of contrastive

LIST OF REFERENCES

Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J.P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Journal 78, 465-483.

Allen, P., Swain, M., Harley, B., & Cummins, J. (1990). Aspects of classroom treatment: Toward a more comprehensive view of second language education. In B.Harley, P.Allen, J. Cummins & M.Swain (Eds.), Development of second language proficiency, (pp.16-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Almasi, J.F. (1995). The nature of fourth graders’ sociocognitive conflicts in peer-led and teacher-led discussions of literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 30 (3), 314-351.

Almasi, J.F., & Gambrell, L.B. (1994). Sociocognitive conflict in peer-led and teacher-led discussions of literature (Research Report No. 12). Athens, GA: University of Maryland and Georgia, National Reading Research Centre.

Alvermann, D.E., O’Brian, D.G., & Dillon, D.R. (1990). What teachers do when they say they’re having discussions of content area reading assignments: A qualitative analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 25 (4), 296-322.

Alvermann, D. E. (2000). Researching libraries, literacies, and lives: A rhizoanalysis. In W. Pillow (Ed.), Working the ruins: Feminist poststructuralist theory and methods in education, (pp. 114-129). New York, NY: Routledge.

Alvermann, D.E. (1995/1996). Peer-led discussions: Whose interests are served? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 39, 282-289.

Anderson, N. (1999). Exploring second language reading: Issues and strategies. Canada: Heinle & Heinle.

Anderson, R.C., & Pearson, P.D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading. In P.D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research, (pp.255-291). New York: Longman.

Anderson, V., & Roit, M. (1996). Linking reading comprehension instruction to language development for language-minority students. The Elementary School Journal, 96, 295- 309.

Anglin, J. M. (1977). Word, object, and conceptual development. New York, NY: Norton.

193

Page 2: LIST OF REFERENCES - University of Floridaplaza.ufl.edu/yildiztr/YILDIZ1/ref.doc · Web viewContrastive rhetoric and second language learning: Notes toward a theory of contrastive

194

Au, K.H. (1997). Ownership, literacy achievement, and students of diverse cultural backgrounds. In J.T. Guthrie & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Promoting literacy engagement: Motivational, strategic reading through integrated instruction (pp. 168-182). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Au, K. H., & Raphael, T. E. (2000). Equity and literacy in the next millennium. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 170-188.

Austin, J. (1962) How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bakhtin, M. (1981). Discourse in the novel. In M. Holquist (Ed.), The Dialogic imagination (pp. 259-422). (C. Emerson & M. Holquist Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. (Original work published 1935).

Bakhtin, M.(1990). Art and answerability. In M. Holquist & V. Liapunov (Eds.), Art and answerability: Early philosophical essays by M. Bakhtin, (pp.1-3). Austin: University of Texas Press.

Bange, P. (1992). A propos de la communication et de l'apprentissage de L2 [On communication and L2 learning]. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère–AILE, 1, 53–85.

Barnes, D., Britton, J., & Torbe, M. (1990). Language, the learner and the school. 4th Edition. Portsmouth: Boynton Cook Publishers.

Barnlund, D.C.(1989). Communicative styles of Japanese and Americans: Images and realities. Belmont, CA: Wardsworth Publishing

Barton, D. (1994) Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford: Blackwell.

Barton, J. (1995). Conducting effective classroom discussions. Journal of Reading, 38, 346-350.

Barzini, L. (1983). The Europeans. New York, NY: Penguin.

Bellack, A.A., Kliebard, H.M., Hyman, R.T., & Smith, F.L. (1966). The language of the classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Berducci, D. (1993). Inside the SLA classroom: verbal interaction in three SL classes. Language Learning Journal, 8, 12-16.

Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1984). Teachability of reflective processes in written composition. Cognitive Science, 180(8), 173–190.

Berg, E.C. (1999). The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 215-241.

Page 3: LIST OF REFERENCES - University of Floridaplaza.ufl.edu/yildiztr/YILDIZ1/ref.doc · Web viewContrastive rhetoric and second language learning: Notes toward a theory of contrastive

195

Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. New York, NY: Anchor Books.

Billig, M. (1992) Talking of the royal family. London: Routledge.

Birch, B.M. (2002). English L2 reading: Getting to the bottom. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Bleich, D. (1978). Subjective criticism. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Bloch, M. (1993) The uses of schooling and literacy in a Zafimaniry village. In B. Street (ed.) Cross-Cultural Approaches to Literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bloome, D. (1985). Reading as a social process. Language Arts, 62 (2), 134-142.

Bloome, D., & Bailey, F.M. (1992). Studying language and literacy through events, particularity, and intertextuality. In R. Beach, J. L. Green, M.L. Kamil, & T. Shanahan (Eds.), Multidisciplinary perspectives on literacy research (pp.181-210). Urbana, IL: National Conference on Research in English and the National Council of Teachers of English.

Bloome, D., & Green, J.L. (1992). Educational contexts of literacy. In W.A. Grabe (Ed.), Annual review of Applied Linguistics (Vol. 12, pp.49-70). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain,E.(1984). Request and apologies. a cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics 5,196-212.

Blyth, C. (2003). Playing games with literacy: The poetic function in the era of communicative language teaching. In P.C. Patrikis (Ed), Reading between lines: Perspectives on foreign language literacy, (pp.60-73). New Haven: Yale University Press.

Bretzing, B.H., & Kulhavey, R.W. (1979). Notetaking and depth of processing, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 4, 145-153.

Bridges, D. (1988). Education, democracy and discussion. Windsor, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research.

Britton, J., Burgess, T., Martin, N., McLeod, A., Rosen, H. (1975). The development of writing abilities. London: Schools Council Publications & Macmillan.

Britton, J. (1969/1990). Talking to learn. In D. Barnes, J. Britton, & M. Torbe, Language, the learner and the school. 4th Edition. Portsmouth: Boynton Cook Publishers.

Page 4: LIST OF REFERENCES - University of Floridaplaza.ufl.edu/yildiztr/YILDIZ1/ref.doc · Web viewContrastive rhetoric and second language learning: Notes toward a theory of contrastive

196

Brock, C. H., & Gavelek, J. R. (1998). Fostering children's engagement with texts: A sociocultural perspective. In T. E. Raphael & K. H. Au (Eds.), Literature-based instruction: Reshaping the curriculum (pp. 71-94). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.

Brooks, L., & Swain, M. (2001). Collaborative writing and sources of feedback: How they support second language learning. OISE/UT manuscript.

Brown, A.L., Collins, A. & Dugid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.

Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. NY: Addison Wesley Longman.

Brown,S., & Eisterhold, J. (2004). Topics in language and culture for teachers. MI: Univesity of Michigan Press.

Bruffee, K.A. (1993). Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Carroll, S., & Swain, M. (1993). Explicit and implicit negative feedback: An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 357-386.

Carspecken, P.F. (1996). Situating selves: the communication of social identities in American scenes. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of theory of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Chong, N., & Baez, F. (2005). Latino culture: A dynamic force in the changing American workplace. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press

Christoph, J. N., & Nystrand, M. (2001). Taking risks, negotiating relationships: One teacher’s transition toward a dialogic classroom. Research in the Teaching of English, 36(2), 249-286.

City of Gainesville (2006). The city of Gainesville official website. Available at: http://www.cityofgainesville.org/ Retrieved March, 2006.

Coe, R. M. (1987). An apology for form: Or, who took the form out of process? College English, 49, 13-28.

Page 5: LIST OF REFERENCES - University of Floridaplaza.ufl.edu/yildiztr/YILDIZ1/ref.doc · Web viewContrastive rhetoric and second language learning: Notes toward a theory of contrastive

197

Cohen, A.D.,& Olshtain, E. (1981). Developing a measure of sociocultural competence: the case of apology. Language Learning, 31,113-134

Cole, M., Engestrom,Y. (1993). A cultural approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognition, (pp.1-46). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Commeyras, M. (1994). Promoting critical thinking through dialogical reading thinking lessons. Reading Teacher, 46, 486-494.

Corey, S. (1940). The teachers out-talk the pupils. The School Review, 48, 745-752.

Coulthard, M., & Montgomery, M. (Eds.). (1981). Studies in discourse analysis. London: Routledge.

Craig, S.(1994). Community directed development through literacy: Fact or myth? Read 29 (1),14-24.

Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

D’Andrade, R. (1995). The development of cognitive anthropology. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

D’Andrade, R., & Strauss, C. (eds) (1992). Human motives and cultural models. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

De Guerrero, M. C.M., & Villamil, O.S. (1994). Social-cognitive dimensions of interaction in L2 peer revisions. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 484-496.

DeGuerrero, M.C.M., & Villamil, O.S. (2000). Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 84, 51-68

Deluca, E. (2004). Exploration of literature discussions in multilingual classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida, FL

Denzin, N.K. (1970). The research act. Chicago, MI: Aldine Publishing.

Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: McMillan.

Dewitt, S. (1997). Interacting with authentic texts: multilayered processes. The Modern Language Journal, 81 (6), 457-469.

DiCamilla, F.J., & Anton, M. (1997).Repetition in the collaborative discourse of L2 learners: A Vygotskian perspective. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 609-633.

Dillon, J. A. (1994). A grammatical description of Tatana. M.A. thesis. University of Texas at Arlington.

Page 6: LIST OF REFERENCES - University of Floridaplaza.ufl.edu/yildiztr/YILDIZ1/ref.doc · Web viewContrastive rhetoric and second language learning: Notes toward a theory of contrastive

198

Dixon, C.N., & Nessel, D.D. (1992). Meaning making: directed reading and thinking activities for second language students. Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.

Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J.P.Lantolf & G.Appel (eds), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp.33-56). Norwood, NJ:Ablex.

Donato, R., & Lantolf, J.P. (1990). The dialogic origins of L2 monitoring. Pragmatics and Pragmatics and Language Learning, 1, 83-98.

Duffy, G. (1981). Teacher effectiveness research: Implications for the reading profession. Direction in reading: Research and instruction, 30th yearbook of the National Reading Conference, 113-136.

Durkin, D. (1978-1979). What classroom observation reveal about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 481-533.

Dyson, A. (1993). Social words of children learning to write. NY: Teachers College Press.

Edelsky, C. (1982). Development of writing in a bilingual program. Final Report. Volumes 1 and 2. Tempe, Arizona: Arizona State

Edelsky, C., Draper, K., & Smith, K. (1983). Hookin’ ‘em in at the start of school in a “whole language” classroom. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 14 (4), 257-281.

Edwards, R. (1997). Changing Places. Flexibility, Lifelong Learning and a Learning Society. London: Routledge.

Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discourse psychology. London: Sage.

Edwards, A.D., & Westgate, D.P.G. (1994). Investigating the classroom talk. Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.

Eeds, M., & Wells, D. (1989). Grand conversations: An exploration of meaning construction in literature study groups. Research in the Teaching of English, 23 (10), pp. 4-29.

ELI (English Language Institute) (2005). English language institute main page. Available at: http://www.eli.ufl.edu/firsttime/class.htm Retrieved April, 2005.

Ellis, N. C., & Beaton, A. (1993). Psycholinguistic determinants of foreign language vocabulary learning. Language Learning, 43, 559-617.

Ellis, R. (2003a). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Page 7: LIST OF REFERENCES - University of Floridaplaza.ufl.edu/yildiztr/YILDIZ1/ref.doc · Web viewContrastive rhetoric and second language learning: Notes toward a theory of contrastive

199

Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G.(2005). Analysing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellsworth, E. (1989). Why doesn’t this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 59, 297-324.

Faerch, C., & Kasper, G. (Eds.). (1983). Strategies in interlanguage communication. London: Longman.

Farnan, N., & Dahl, K.L. (2003). Children’s writing: Research and Practice. In Flood, J., Lapp, D., Squire, J.R., Jensen, J. (Eds.). Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts, (pp. 913-1007). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Fernández-García, M., & Martínez-Arbelaiz, A. (2002). Negotiation of meaning in nonnative speaker-nonnative speaker synchronous discussion. CALICO, 19(2), 279-294.

Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Fitzgerald, J. (1995). English-as-a-second-language learners’ cognitive reading processes: A review of research in the United States. Review of Educational Research, 65 (2), 145-190.

FitzGerald, H. (2003). How different are we? Spoken discourse in intercultural communication: The significance of the situational context. Clevedon, Buffalo: Multilingual Matters.

Flood, J., Lapp, D., Squire, J.R., Jensen, J. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Fraser, B.J. (1981). Learning Environment in Curriculum Evaluation: A Review. Evaluation in Education series. Oxford: Pergamon.

Foster, P. (1998). A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics 19 (1), 1–23.

Fox, H. (1994). Listening to the world: Cultural issues in academic writing. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

Fu, D. (2006). Second language writing: Broadening perspectives in second language writing. Paper presented at 44 Annual TESOL Conference Tampa, FL.

Gajo, L., & Mondada, L. (2000). Acquisition et interaction en contextes [Acquisition and interaction in contexts]. Fribourg, Switzerland: Editions Universitaires

Page 8: LIST OF REFERENCES - University of Floridaplaza.ufl.edu/yildiztr/YILDIZ1/ref.doc · Web viewContrastive rhetoric and second language learning: Notes toward a theory of contrastive

200

Galda, L., & Beach, R. (2000). Response to literature as a cultural activity. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 214-235.

Gall, M.D. & Gall, J.P. (1976). The discussion method. In N.L. Gage (Ed.), The psychology of teaching methods (no. 75, pt. 1, pp. 166-216). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Gambrell, L.B., & Almasi, J.F. (1996). Lively discussions. Newark, DA: International Reading Association.

Gascoigne, C. (2002). The Debate on Grammar in Second Language Acquisition: Past, Present, and Future. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.

Gass, S.,& Lakshmanan, U. (1991). Accounting for interlanguage subject pronouns. Second Language Research, 7, 181-203.

Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2001). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Gass, S., & Varonis, E. (1985a). Task variation and non-native/nonnative negotiation of meaning. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input and second language acquisition, (pp. 149-161). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Gass, S., & Varonis, E. (1985b). Variation in native speaker speech modification to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 7, 35-57.

Gass, S.M., & Varonis, E.M. (1986). Sex differences in non-native speaker-non-native speaker interactions. In R.R. Day (Ed), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition, (pp.327-351). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.

Garcia, E. (1993). Language, culture and education. In L. Darling- Hammond (Ed.) Review of research in education (pp. 51-97). Washington, DC: American Education Research Association.

Gavalek, J. R. (1986). The social contexts of literacy and schooling: A developmental perspective. In T. Raphael (Ed.), The contexts of school based literacy, (pp. 3-26). New York: Random House.

Gee, J.P. (1992). Discourse and Sociocultural studies in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Methods of literacy research: Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. 3), (pp.119-132). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Gee, J.P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses, 2nd Ed. London: Taylor & Francis.

Gee, J.P. (1999/2005). An introduction to discourse analysis. New York: Routledge.

Page 9: LIST OF REFERENCES - University of Floridaplaza.ufl.edu/yildiztr/YILDIZ1/ref.doc · Web viewContrastive rhetoric and second language learning: Notes toward a theory of contrastive

201

Gee, J.P. (2001). Literacy, discourse, and linguistics: Introduction and what is literacy? In E. Cushman, E. R. Kintgen, B.M. Kroll, M.Rose (Eds.), Literacy a critical sourcebook, (pp 525-544). Boston, MA: Bedford.

Gee, J.P., Michaels, S., & O’Connor, M.C. (1992). The multifaceted nature of discourse analysis. In M. D. LeCompte, W. L. Milroy & J. Preissle (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 228-291). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Gergen, K.J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modem psychology. American Psychologist. 40, 266-75.

Gergen, K. J. (1991). The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Gergen, K.J. (1994a). Toward transformation in social knowledge. (2nd Ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Gergen, K.J. (1994b). Realities and relationships: Soundings in social construction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Gergen, K. J., & Gergen, M. M. (1991). Toward reflexive methodologies. In F. Steier (Ed.), Research and Reflexivity (pp. 76-95). London: Sage.

Gersten, A. (1996). Literacy instruction for language-minority students: The transition years. The Elementary School Journal, 96 (3), 227-244.

Gilbert, G.N., & Mulkay, M. (1984). Opening Pandora’s Box: A sociological analysis of scientists’ discourse. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Glew, P.J. (1998). Verbal interaction and English second language acquisition in classroom contexts. Issues in Educational Research, 8(2), 83-94. Available at: http://education.curtin.edu.au/iier/iier8/glew.html Retrieved February, 2006.

Glew, P.J. (1995). An investigation of ESL classroom verbal interaction: Ethnicity, gender, and classroom contexts. Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of Queensland.

Glover J., Plake, B., Roberts B., Zimmer, J., & Palmere, M. (1981). Distinctiveness of encoding: The effects of paraphrasing and drawing inferences on memory from prose. Journal of Educational Psychology 73, 736-744.

Goldblatt, E., & Smith, M.W. (1995). Alone with each other: Conceptions of discussions in one college classroom community. Linguistics and Education, 7, 327-348.

Goodlad, J. (1984). A place called school. NY: McGraw Hill.

Page 10: LIST OF REFERENCES - University of Floridaplaza.ufl.edu/yildiztr/YILDIZ1/ref.doc · Web viewContrastive rhetoric and second language learning: Notes toward a theory of contrastive

202

Gore, J. (1993). The struggle for pedagogies. New York: Routledge.

Grant, R. (1996). The ethics of talk: Classroom conversations and democratic politics. Teachers College Record, 67, 470-482.

Graves, D., & Hansen, J.(1983). The author’s chair. Language Arts, 60, 176-182.

Grellet, F. (1981). Developing reading skills: A practical guide to reading comprehension exercises. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Guthrie, J.T., Schafer, W.D., Wang, Y.Y., & Afflerbach, P.P. (1995). Influences of instruction on reading engagement: An empirical exploration of social-cognitive framework of reading activity. Reading Research Quarterly, 30 (1), 8-25.

Gutierrez, K. (1993). Biliteracy and the language-minority child. In B. Spodek and 0.Saracho (Eds), Language and Literacy in Early Childhood Education, (pp. 82-101). New York: Teachers College Press.

Gutierrez, K. (1994). How talk, context, and script shape contexts for learning: A cross-case comparison of journal sharing. Linguistics and Education 5, 335-365.

Gutierrez, K. & Larson, C. (1994). Language borders: Recitation as hegemonic discourse. International Journal of Educational Reform 3, 22-36.

Hacking, I. (2000). The social construction of what. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Hall, J.K. (1993). The role of oral practices in the accomplishment of our everyday lives: The sociocultural dimension of interaction with implications for the learning of another language. Applied Linguistics, 14, 145-167.

Hammerly, H. (1987). The immersion program: Litmus test of second language acquisition through language communication. The Modern Language Journal, 71, 395–401.

Harley, B. (1993). Instructional strategies and SLA in early French immersion. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 245–260.

Harley, B., & Swain, M. (1978). An analysis of the verb system by young learners of French. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 3, 35–79.

Harre, R. (Ed.). (1986). The social construction of emotions. New York: Basil Blackwell.

Hatch, E. (1978). Discourse analysis and second language acquisition. In E. Hatch (Ed.), Second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Page 11: LIST OF REFERENCES - University of Floridaplaza.ufl.edu/yildiztr/YILDIZ1/ref.doc · Web viewContrastive rhetoric and second language learning: Notes toward a theory of contrastive

203

Heap, J.L. (1992). Ethnomethodology and the possibility of metaperspective on literacy research. In R. Beach, J. L. Green, M.L. Kamil, & T.Shanahan (Eds.), Multidisciplinary perspectives on literacy research, (pp.35-56). Urbana, IL: National Conference on Research in English and the National Council of Teachers of English.

Heath, B.S.(1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hill, M.R. (1993). Archival strategies and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hillocks, G., Jr. (1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. Urbana, IL: NCTE.

Hillocks, G. Jr. (1995). Teaching writing as reflective practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Hinchman, K.A., & Young, J.P. (2001). Speaking but not being heard: Two adolescents negotiate classroom talk about text. Journal of Literacy Research, 33 (2), 243-268

Holland, D. & Quinn, N. (Eds.). (1987). Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hornberger, N.H. (1994) Continua of biliteracy. In B.M. Ferdman, R. Weber, & A.G. Ramirez (Eds.), Literacy across languages and cultures, (pp. 103-139). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Hudelson, S. (1984). Children become literate in English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 18, 221-238.

Hymes, D. H. (1967). Linguistic problems in defining the concept of “tribe.” In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the problem of the tribe, (pp. 23-48). Seattle: University of Washington Press.

Hymes, D. H. (1972). Models of the interaction of language and social Life. In J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication, (pp. 35-71). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Hymes, D. H. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: an ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Iser, W. (1980). The reading process: A phenomenological approach. In J.P. Tompkins (Ed.), Reader response criticism: From formalism to poststructuralism, (pp.50-69). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Izumi, S., Bigelow, M., Fujiwara, M., & Fearnow, S. (1999). Testing the output hypothesis: Effects of output on noticing and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 421-452.

Page 12: LIST OF REFERENCES - University of Floridaplaza.ufl.edu/yildiztr/YILDIZ1/ref.doc · Web viewContrastive rhetoric and second language learning: Notes toward a theory of contrastive

204

Jorgensen, D. L. (1989). Participant observation: A methodology for human studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Kachru, B.B. (1985). Standards, codifications and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In R. Quirk and H.C.G. Widdowson (Eds.). English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and literatures, (pp. 11-30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kachru, B.B. (1992). Meaning in deviation. In B.B. Kachru (Ed.), The Other Tongue. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Kachru B. & Nelson C. (1996). Language attitudes, motivation and standards. In S. McKay & N. Hornberger (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language teaching (pp. 71-102). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kagitcibasi, C.(1994).A critical appraisal of individualism and collectivism: Towards a new formulation. In U. Kim, H.C. Triandis, C.Kagitcibasi, S.C.Choi and G.Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Methods and Applications, (pp. ) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Kang, K. (2004). Korean’s politeness strategies. In F.E. Jandt (Ed), Intercultural communication. A global reader, (pp 131-142). Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage

Kaplan,R.B. (1988). Contrastive rhetoric and second language learning: Notes toward a theory of contrastive rhetoric. In A.C. Purves (Ed.), Writing across languages and cultures: Issues in contrastive rhetoric, (pp. 275-304). New Delhi, Indiana: Sage.

Kasanga, L. A. (1996). Peer interaction and L2 learning. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 52(4), 611-639.

Keil, F. (1979). Semantic and conceptual development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Keil, F. (1989). Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Kennedy, 1983; Kennedy, C. (Ed.). (1983). Language planning and language education. London: Allen and Unwin.

Kern, R.G. (2003). Literacy as a New Organizing Principle for foreign language education. In P.C. Patrikis (Ed), Reading between lines: Perspectives on foreign language literacy, (pp.40-59). New Haven: Yale University Press.

Kiesling, S.F., & Paulston, C.B. (Eds.). (2005). Intercultural discourse and communication: The essential readings. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Page 13: LIST OF REFERENCES - University of Floridaplaza.ufl.edu/yildiztr/YILDIZ1/ref.doc · Web viewContrastive rhetoric and second language learning: Notes toward a theory of contrastive

205

Kim, H., Hearn, G., Hatcher, C., & Weber, I. (2004). Online communication between Australians and Koreans. In F.E. Jandt (Ed.), Intercultural communication. A global reader, (pp.142-279). Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage.

Klingner, J.K., & Vaughn, S. (2000). The helping behaviors of fifth graders while using collaborative strategic reading during ESL content classes. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 69-98.

Knefelkamp, L. (1995). The practice-to-theory-to-practice model. VA: Stylus Publishing.

Koda, K. (1997). Orthographic knowledge in L2 lexical processing: A cross-linguistic perspective. In Coady, J. & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition, (pp. 35-52). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Kong, A. and Pearson, P.D. (2003) The Road to Participation: The Construction of a Literacy Practice in a Learning Community of Linguistically Diverse Learners. In Research in the Teaching of English,Vol. 38, No. 1. Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.

Kowal, M., & Swain, M. (1994). Using collaborative language production tasks to promote students' language awareness. Language Awareness, 3(2), 73-93.

Kowal, M., & Swain, M. (1997). From semantic to syntactic processing: How can we promote it in the French immersion classroom? In K. Johnson & M. Swain (Eds), Immersion education: International perspectives, (pp. 284-309). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Krafft, U., & Dausendschon-Gay, U. (1994). Analyse conversationnelle et recherché sur I’acquisition [Conversation analysis and research on acquisition]. Bulletin VALS/ASLA, 59, 127-158.

Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergemon Press.

Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.

Kulhavy,R.W., Dyer,J.W., & Silver, L. (1975).The effects on note-taking and test expectancy on the learning of the text material. Journal of Educational Research, 68, 363-365.

Kvale, S. (1989). Issues of validity in qualitative research. Lund, Sweden: Chartwell Bratt.

Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Lado, R.(1957). Linguistics across cultures. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.

Page 14: LIST OF REFERENCES - University of Floridaplaza.ufl.edu/yildiztr/YILDIZ1/ref.doc · Web viewContrastive rhetoric and second language learning: Notes toward a theory of contrastive

206

Landis, D., Bennett, J. M., & Bennett, M.J. (Eds). (2004). Handbook of intercultural training. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Langer, J. 1986. A Sociocognitive perspective on literacy. Urbana, IL: Language and Reasoning: ERIC Clearinghouse.

Langer, J. (1995). Envisioning literature: Literary understanding and literature instruction. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Langer, J. (1999). Thinking and doing literature. An eight year study. English Journal, 87 (2), 16-23.

Lantolf, J.P. (2000). Second language learning as a mediated process. Language teaching: The International Abstracting Journal for Language Teachers and Applied Linguistics, 33, 79-96.

Lantolf, J. (2001). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lantolf, J.P., & Appel, G. (Eds.). (1994). Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Lantolf, J.P., & Pavlenko, A. (1995). Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 15, 108-124.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Leal, D. (1992). The nature of talk about three types of text during peer group discussions. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24 (3), 313-338.

Lee, M. (1993). Gender, group composition, and peer interaction in computer-based cooperative learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 9(4), 549-577.

Leon,M. (2006). Leon’s EFL Planet. Available at: http://efl.htmlplanet.com/whole_index.htm Retrieved January, 2006.

Leont’ev, A,N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In J.V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet Psychology (pp. 37-71). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.

Leow, R.P.(1993). Simplification and Second Language Acquisition. World Englishes, 16, 291-295. 

Lightbown, P.M. & Spada, N. (2001). How languages are learned, NewYork: Oxford University Press.

Page 15: LIST OF REFERENCES - University of Floridaplaza.ufl.edu/yildiztr/YILDIZ1/ref.doc · Web viewContrastive rhetoric and second language learning: Notes toward a theory of contrastive

207

Lindfors, J.W. (1990). Speaking creatures in the classroom. In S. Hynds & D.L. Rubin (Eds.), Perspectives on talk and learning, (pp.21-40). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

Long, M.(1980). Input, interaction and second language acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.

Long, M.H. (1983a). Does second language instruction make a difference?: A review of research. TESOL Quarterly, 17(3), 359-365.

Long, M.H. (1983b). Native speaker/ non-native speaker conversation in the second language classroom. In M. Clarke, & J. Handscombe, (Eds.), On TESOL' 82: Pacific perspectives on language learning and teaching. Washington, DC: TESOL.

Long, M.H. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In S. Gass & G. Madden, Input in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Newbury House Publishers.

Long, M.H. (1996).The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W.C. Ritchie & T.K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition, (pp.413-468) San Diego: Academic Press.

Long, M., Adams, L., Mclean, M. and Castanos, F. (1994). Doing things with words: verbal interaction in lockstep and small group classroom situations. In R. Ellis (Ed.), The study of second language acquisition, (pp. 45-56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Long, M., & Porter, P. (1985). Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19 (2), 207-228.

Mackey, A., McDonough, K., & Kim, Yuja. 1999. NNS/NNS interaction: Feedback and input incorporation. American Association for Applied Linguistics Conference '99, Stamford, CT.

Many, J. E., & Wiseman, D. L. (1992). Analyzing Versus Experiencing: The Effects of Teaching Approaches on Students' Responses. In J. Many & C. Cox (Eds.), Reader stance and literary understanding, (pp. 250-276). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Markee, N. (2000). Conversation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Marshall, G. (Ed.) (1994) The concise Oxford dictionary of sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Marshall, J.D., Smagorinsky, P., Smith, M.W. (1994). The language of interpretation: Patterns of discourse in discussions of literature. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

Page 16: LIST OF REFERENCES - University of Floridaplaza.ufl.edu/yildiztr/YILDIZ1/ref.doc · Web viewContrastive rhetoric and second language learning: Notes toward a theory of contrastive

208

Martinez, M., Roser, N.L., Hoffman, J.V., & Battle, J. (1992). Fostering better discussions through response logs and a response framework: A case description. In C.K. Kinzer & D.J. Leu (Eds.), Literacy research, theory and practice: Views from many perspectives, (pp.303-311). Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference.

Matthiessen, C., & Thompson, S.A.(1987).The structure of discourse and 'subordination'. Marina del Rey, CA: Information Sciences Institute.

McGee, L. (1992). An exploration of meaning construction in first graders’ grand conversations. In C.K. Kinzer & D.J. Leu (Eds.), Literacy research, theory, and practice: Views from many perspectives (41st Yearbook of the National Reading Conference, pp. 177-186).Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference.

McMahon, S. (1992). A group of five students as they participate in their student-led book club. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.

Mead, G.H. (1964). Selected writings. New York, NY: Bobbs-Merrill.

Mercer, N. (1995) The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Mercer, N. (1996). Language and the guided construction of knowledge. In G. M. Blue & R. Mitchell (Eds.). Language and education: Papers from the annual meeting of the British Association for Applied Linguistics, pp (28-38).Multilingual Matters, PA, Clevedon.

Mishler, E. G. (1990). Validation in inquiry-guided research: The role of exemplars in narrative studies. Harvard Educational Review, 60, 415-442.

Mondada, L., & Doehler, S. P. (2004). Second Language Acquisition as Situated practice: Task accomplishment in the French second language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88 (4), 501-518).

Morrow, L.M., & Weinstein, C.S. (1986). Encouraging voluntary reading: The impact of a literature program on children’s use of library corners. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 330-346.

Nassaji, H., & Swain, M. (2000). A Vygotskian Perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles. Language Awareness, 9(1), 34-51.

Nelson, G., & Carson, J. (1998). ESL students' perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 113-131.

Newkirk, T. (1982). Young writers as critical readers. Language Arts, 59, 451-547.

Page 17: LIST OF REFERENCES - University of Floridaplaza.ufl.edu/yildiztr/YILDIZ1/ref.doc · Web viewContrastive rhetoric and second language learning: Notes toward a theory of contrastive

209

Nieto, S. (1999). The light in their eyes: Creating multicultural learning communities. New York, NY: Teachers’ College.

Nunan, D. (1988).  The learner centered curriculum. Cambridge: CUP.

Nuttall, C. (1982). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. London: Heinemann.

Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1991). Instructional discourse, student engagement and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 261-290.

Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1997). The big picture: Language and learning in hundreds of English lessons. In M. Nystrand (Ed.), Opening dialogue, (pp.30-74). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

O’Flahavan, J.F. (1989). An exploration of the effects of participant structure upon literacy development in reading group discussion. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 

Odlin, T. 1990. Language transfer. Cambridge: Cambridge

Ohta, A. S. (2001). Peer integrative tasks and assisted performance in classroom language learning. In A.S. Ohta, Second language acquisition process in the classroom: Learning Japanese, (pp.73-128). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Olson, C.B. (2003). The Reading/Writing Connection. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Olshtain, E. (1983). Sociocultural competence and language transfer: the case of apology. In S. Gass and L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning, 232-249. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Olstain, E., & Cohen, A.D.(1983). Apology: A speech -act set. In N. Wolfson & E. Judd (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition, (pp.18-35).Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Olshtain, E., & Cohen, A.D. (1989). Speech act behavior across languages. In H. W. Dechert & Manfred Raupach (Eds.), Transfer in language production (pp. 53-68). Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing.

Omaggio, A. C. (1986). Teaching language in context: Proficiency-oriented instruction. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Oxford, R.L. (1997). Cooperative learning, collaborative learning, and interaction: Three communicative strands in the language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 81 (4), 443-456.

Page 18: LIST OF REFERENCES - University of Floridaplaza.ufl.edu/yildiztr/YILDIZ1/ref.doc · Web viewContrastive rhetoric and second language learning: Notes toward a theory of contrastive

210

Paulus, T.M. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 265-289.

Pekarek, S. (1999). Conversation lessons: Interactional dynamics and acquisition of discourse competencies in the second language classroom. Fribourg, Switzerland: Editions Universitaires.

Pennycook, A (1996). Borrowing others' words: text, ownership, memory and plagiarism, TESOL Quarterly, 30(2), 201-230.

Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44, 493-527.

Pica, T., & Doughty, C. (1985). The role of group work in classroom second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 233-248.

Pica, T., Young, R., & Doughty, C. (1987). The impact on interaction on comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 737-758.

Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N., & Morgenthaler, L. (1989). Comprehensible output as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 63-90.

Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N., & Morgenthaler, L. (1989). Comprehensible output as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11(1), 63-87.

Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language research and instruction. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and second language learning, (pp. 9-34). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Poplin, M. (1988). Holistic/constructivist principles of the teaching/learning process: Implications for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 401-416.

Potter, D. & Anderson, M. (1976). Discussion in small groups: A guide to effective practice, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company, Inc.

Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage.

Potter, J. (2002). Discourse analysis as a way of analyzing naturally occurring talk. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research, theory, method and practice, (pp. 144-160).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.

Page 19: LIST OF REFERENCES - University of Floridaplaza.ufl.edu/yildiztr/YILDIZ1/ref.doc · Web viewContrastive rhetoric and second language learning: Notes toward a theory of contrastive

211

Prawat, R. (1989). Promoting access to knowledge, strategy, and disposition in students: A research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 59 (1) 1-41.

Pregoy, S.F., & Boyle, O.F. (2001). Reading, writing and learning in ESL. NY: Addison Wesley Longman.

Purves, A., & Hawisher, G. (1990). “Writers, Judges, and text models” In R. Beach & S. Hynds (Eds), Developing discourse practices in adolescent and adulthood, (pp. 183-199). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Reid, L.(1989). “You see their interselves”: Small-group discussion poetry. In P.Phelan (Ed.), Talking to learn: Classroom practices in teaching English, (Vol 24. pp.).

Resnick, A. (1990). The survey analysis and summary. In M.H. Li & P.Li (Eds.), Understanding Asian Americans: A curriculum resource guide, (pp.23-30). NY: Neal-Schuman

Reynolds, S., & Valentine, D.(2004). Guide to cross-cultural communication. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Richards, J.(1979). Participant reference in discourse. Notes on Linguistics, 10, 31-40.

Robb, T., Ross, S., Shortreed, I. (1986). Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 83-95.

Rodriguez-Garcia, L. R. (2000). A cognitive framework for the development of speaking-reading skills: Can oral peer interaction enhance reading comprehension of authentic texts? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New York, Buffalo.

Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.

Rogoff, B., & Lave, J. (1984). Everyday cognition: its development in social context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Rogoff, B., Paradise, R., Arauz, R. M., Correa-Chávez, M., & Angelillo, C. (1996). Firsthand learning through intent participation. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 175-203.

Rosenblatt, L.M. (1938/1976). Literature as exploration. New York: Modern Language Association.

Rosenblatt, L.M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

Page 20: LIST OF REFERENCES - University of Floridaplaza.ufl.edu/yildiztr/YILDIZ1/ref.doc · Web viewContrastive rhetoric and second language learning: Notes toward a theory of contrastive

212

Rouse, J. (1996). Feminism and the social construction of scientific knowledge. In L.H. Nelson & J. Nelson (Eds.), Feminism, science, and the philosophy of science, (pp. 195-215). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.

Rubin, D. L. (1990). Introduction: Ways of talking about talking and learning. In S. Hynds & D.L. Rubin (Eds.), Perspectives on talk and learning, (pp.1-20). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

Ruddell, R.B., & Ruddell, M.R. (1994). Language as a meaning-construction process. In R.B. Ruddell, M.R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed.) (pp. 94-96). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Salomon, G. (1993). No distribution without individuals’ cognition: A dynamic interactional view. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognition, (pp.111-138). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Samovar, L.A., & Porter, R.E. (2001). Communication between cultures. Stamford, CT: Wadsworth.

Sapir, E., & Whorf, B. L. (1964): 'Science and Linguistics', Technology Review. In B. L. Whorf & J.B. Caroll (Eds.), Language, Thought and Reality, (pp 17-24). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Sato, C. J.(1981). Ethnic styles in classroom discourse. In M. Hines and W. Rutherford (Eds.), On TESOL '81, (pp.11-24). Washington, D.C.: TESOL.

Sato, C.J. (1990). Ethnic styles in classroom discourse. In R.C. Scarcella., E.S. Anderson & S.D. Krashen (Eds.), Developing communicative competence in a second language: Series on issues in second language research, (pp.107-119). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.

Saville- Troike, M., & Kleifgen, J.A. (1989). Culture and language in classroom communication. In J. A. Fishman (Ed.), English aross cultures, cultures across English: A reader in cross-cultural communication, (pp-) NY:

Scarcella, R., & Higa, C. (1981). Input, negotiation, and age differences in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 31 (2), 409-438.

Schegloff, E., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 62, 696-735.

Schmidt, R., & Frota,S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of adult learner of Portuguese. In R. Day (Ed.) Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition, (pp.237-326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Page 21: LIST OF REFERENCES - University of Floridaplaza.ufl.edu/yildiztr/YILDIZ1/ref.doc · Web viewContrastive rhetoric and second language learning: Notes toward a theory of contrastive

213

Schumann, J. (1978a).The acculturation model for second language acquisition. In R. Gingras (Ed). Second language acquisition for foreign language teaching, (pp. 27-50). Arlington, VA; Center for Applied Linguistics.

Schumann, J. (1978b). The pidginization process: A model for second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Schumann, J. (1978c). Social and psychological factors in second language acquisition. In Richards, J. (Ed.), Error analysis: perspectives on second language learning, (pp. ). London: Longman.

Schwandt, T.A. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry, In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, (pp. 118-137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Schwatz, J. (1980). The negotiation for meaning: Repair in conversations between second language learners of English. In D. Larsen-Freeman (Ed.), Discourse analysis in second language research, (pp.138-153). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researchers, 27, 4-13

Shehadeh, A. (2006). Intercultural communication: Whose culture, whose pragmatics? Discussion session. TESOL Annual Conference.

Shore, B. (1996). Culture in mind: Cognition, culture, and the problem of meaning. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Short, K.G., & Pierce, K.M. (Eds.). (1990). Talking about books: Creating literate communities. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Silberstein, S. (1994). Techniques and resources in teaching reading. New York: Oxford University Press.

Sinclair, J. and Coulthard, M. (1975) Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Slavin, R.E. (1989). Cooperative learning and student achievement. In R.E. Slavin (Ed.), School and classroom organization, (pp.129-156). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum.

Slavin, R.E. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Smith, F. (1975). Comprehension and learning. Katonah, NY: Owen.

Smith, F. (1988). Joining the literacy club: Further essays into education. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Page 22: LIST OF REFERENCES - University of Floridaplaza.ufl.edu/yildiztr/YILDIZ1/ref.doc · Web viewContrastive rhetoric and second language learning: Notes toward a theory of contrastive

214

Spada, N., & Lightbown,P. (1993). Instruction and the development of questions in L2 classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 205-224.

Spear, K. (1993). Spiraling toward maturity: Peer response as a window on social and intellectual development. In . K. Spear (Ed.), Peer response groups in action: Writing together in secondary schools (pp-). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook

Spears, K. (Ed.). (2004). Peer response groups in action: Writing together in secondary schools. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook

Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt.

Stetsenko, A., & Arievitch, I. (1997). Constructing and deconstructing the self: Comparing post-Vygotskian and discourse–based versions of social construction. Mind, Culture, and Activity: An International Journal, 4 159-172.

Storch, N. (1999). Are two heads better than one? Pair work and grammatical accuracy. System, 27, 363-374.

Storch, N. (2000). Is pair work conductive to language learning? The nature of assistance in adult ESL pair work and its effect on language development. Paper presented at the conference on Scaffolding and Language Learning in Educational Contexts: Socio-cultural Approaches to Theory and Practice. Centre for Language and Literacy, University of Technology, Sydney.

Storch, N. (2001a). How collaborative is pair work/ ESL tertiary students composing in pairs. Language Teaching Research, 5, 29-53.

Storch, N. (2001b). An investigation into the nature of pair work in an ESL classroom and its effect on grammatical development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Melbourne.

Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52, 119-158.

Stotsky, S. (1984). Commentary: A proposal for improving high school students' ability to read and write expository prose. Journal of Reading, 28, 4-7.

Strauss, C., & Quinn, N. (1997). A cognitive theory of cultural meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Straw, S.B., & Bogdan, D. (1993). Constructive reading: Teaching beyond communication. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Street, B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Page 23: LIST OF REFERENCES - University of Floridaplaza.ufl.edu/yildiztr/YILDIZ1/ref.doc · Web viewContrastive rhetoric and second language learning: Notes toward a theory of contrastive

215

Suedo, K.(2004). Differences in the perception of face. In F. E. Jandt (Ed.), Intercultural communication: A global reader, (pp 292-304). Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage.

Swain, M (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass & C.G. Madden (Eds), Input in second language acquisition, (pp.235-253), Rosley, MA: Newbury House.

Swain, M. (1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren't enough. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 50(1), 158-164.

Swain, M. (1997). Collaborative dialogue: its contribution to second language learning. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 34, 115-132.

Swain, M. (2000) The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J.Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning, (pp.97-114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Swain, M., Brooks, L., & Tocalli-Beller, A. (2002). Peer-peer dialogue as a means of a second language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 171-185.

Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371-391.

Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 320-337.

Sweigart, W. (1991). Classroom talk, knowledge development, and writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 25 (4), 469-496.

Tang, G.M., & Tithecott, J. (1999). Peer response in ESL writing. TESL Canada Journal 16, 20-38.

Taylor, B. M., & Beach, R. W. (1984). The Effects of Text Structure Instruction on Middle-grade Students’ Comprehension and Production of Expository Text. Reading Research Quarterly, 19 (2), 134-173.

Taylor, B.M., & Berkowitz, S. (1980). Facilitating children's comprehension of content area material. In M. Kamil & A. Moe (Eds.), Perspectives on reading and instruction, (pp. 64-68). Washington, DC: National Reading Conference.

Tharp, R., & Gallimore, R. (1998). Rousing minds of life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Thomas, W.P., & Collier, V.P. (1995). Language minority student achievement and program effectiveness. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.

Page 24: LIST OF REFERENCES - University of Floridaplaza.ufl.edu/yildiztr/YILDIZ1/ref.doc · Web viewContrastive rhetoric and second language learning: Notes toward a theory of contrastive

216

Thomas, W.P., & Collier, V. (1997). School effectiveness for language minority students. (NCBE Resource Collection Series No. 9). Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education. Retrieved April 18, 2003, from www.ncela.gwu.edu/ncbepubs/resource/effectiveness/

Tierney, R.J., & Shanahan, T.1991). Research on the reading-writing relationship: Interactions, transactions, and outcomes. In R.Barr, M.Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P.D.Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, (Vol 2, pp. 246-280). New York: Longman.

Tierney, R. J., & Leys, M. (1984). What is the Value of Connecting Reading and Writing? Reading Education Report No. 55. Washington, DC: Center for the Study of Reading. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 251 810.)

Ting-Toomey,S. (1990). Introduction: Stereotypes and misconceptions. In M.Li & P.Li (Eds.), Understanding Asian Americans: A curriculum resource guide. (pp.19-20). NY: Neal-Schuman.

Tocalli- Beller, A. (2001). Cognitive conflict, disagreement, and repetition in collaborative groups: Insights into the affective and social dimensions. QISE/UT manuscripts.

Townsend, J.S. (1991). A study of wondering discourse in three literature class discussions. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.

Tsui, A.B.M., & Ng, M. (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 147-170.

Tudge, J. (1990). Vygotsky, the zone of proximal development, and peer collaboration: Implications for classroom practice. In L.C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional applications of sociohistorical psychology, (pp.155-172). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Turner, J., & Paris, S. G. (1995). How literacy tasks influence children's motivation for literacy. The Reading Teacher, 48 (8), 662-673.

Valdes, G. (1998). The world outside and inside schools: Language and immigrant children. Educational Researcher, 27(6), 4-18.

Van Dijk, T.A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension, New York: Academic Press.

Varonis, E. M., & Gass, S. (1985a). Non-native/non-native conversations: A model for negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 6, 71-90.

Varonis, E.M., & Gass, S. (1985b). Miscommunication in native/nonnative conversation. Language in Society, 14 (3), 327-343.

Page 25: LIST OF REFERENCES - University of Floridaplaza.ufl.edu/yildiztr/YILDIZ1/ref.doc · Web viewContrastive rhetoric and second language learning: Notes toward a theory of contrastive

217

Villamil, O.S., & de Guerrero, M.C.M. (1996). Peer revision in the L2 classroom: Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 51-75.

Villamil, O.S., & de Guerrero, M.C.M. (1998). Assessing the impact of peer revision on L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 19, 491-514.

Villamil, O.S. & de Guerrero, M.C.M. (2000). Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. Modern Language Journal, 84, 51-68.

Villaume, S.K., Worden, T., Williams, S., Hopkins, L., & Rosenblatt, C. (1994). Five teachers in search of a discussion. The Reading Teacher, 47 (6), 480-487.

Villaume, S. K., Hopkins, L. (1995). A transactional and sociocultural view of response in a fourth- grade literature discussion group. Reading Research and Instruction, 34, 190- 203.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1962).Thought and language. Edited and translated by Eugenia Hanfmann and Gertrude Vakar. Cambridge, MA, NY: MIT Press; John Wiley.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1972-1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). (R.W. Rieber & A. S. Carton Eds). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Problems of general psychology, including the volume Thinking and speech New York: Plenum Press.

Weincek, J., & O’Flahavan, J.F. (1994). From teacher-led to peer discussions about literature: Suggestions for making the shift. Language Arts, 71, 488-498.

Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Toward a sociocultural practice and the education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wells, G. (2000). Dialogic inquiry in education: Building on the legacy of Vygotsky. In C.D.Lee & P.Smagorinsky (Eds), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research, (pp. 51-85). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Wertsch, J.V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social foundation of mind. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Wertsch, J.V. (1991). A sociocultural approach to socially shared cognition. In L.B. Resnick, J.M. Levine & S.D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition, (pp.85-100). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

White, J.J. (1990). Involving different social and cultural groups in discussions. In W.W. Wilen (Ed.), Teaching and learning through discussion, (pp.147-174). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

Page 26: LIST OF REFERENCES - University of Floridaplaza.ufl.edu/yildiztr/YILDIZ1/ref.doc · Web viewContrastive rhetoric and second language learning: Notes toward a theory of contrastive

218

Withrow F.B (2004). Literacy in the Digital Age. New York: Scarcrow Press Inc

Witkin, S. L. (1999). Identities and contexts. Social Work, 44, 293-297.

Witte, S. P., & Flach, J. (1994). Notes toward an assessment of advanced ability to communicate. Assessing Writing, 1 (2), 207-246.

Yano, Y., Long, M.H., & Ross, S. (1994). The effects of simplified and elaborated texts on foreign language reading comprehension. Language Learning, 44, 189-219.

Young, R. F., & Miller, E. (2004). Learning as changing participation: Discourse roles in ESL writing conferences. The Modern Language Journal, 88 (4), 519-535.

Young, R., & Watson, K. (1981). Verbal communication: The nature of classroom discourse. In Deakin University, Classroom communication: Classroom processes, (pp.81-100). Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.

Zamel, V. (1992). Writing one’s way into reading. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 463-485.

Zoellner, R. (1969). Talk-write: A behavioral pedagogy for composition. College English, 30 (40), 267-320.

Page 27: LIST OF REFERENCES - University of Floridaplaza.ufl.edu/yildiztr/YILDIZ1/ref.doc · Web viewContrastive rhetoric and second language learning: Notes toward a theory of contrastive

219