LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.”...

73
54 LIST OF REFERENCES American Plywood Association (1995). “Design Capacities of APA Performance Rated Structural-Use Panels.” Technical Note N375B. Australian Standard. Domestic Metal Framing Code, AS3623 (1993). Standards Association of Australia, Homebush, NSW. Band, B. S., Jr. (1996). “Vibration Characteristics of Joist and Joist-Girder Members.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia. Clough, R. W. (1993). Dynamics of Structures . McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, New York. Hibbitt, Karlson and Sorenson (1984) ABAQUS User’s Manual, Version 4.5. Hibbitt, Karlson and Sorenson, Inc. Johnson, J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia. Kitterman, S. S. (1994) “Investigation of Several Aspects of the Vibration Characteristics of Steel Member-Supported Floors.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia. Lenzen, K. H. and Dorsett, L. P. (1969) “Effect of the Variation of Structural Parameters on the Vibrational Characteristics of Steel Joist-Concrete Slab Floor Systems and Suggested Designs.” Studies in Engineering Mechanics, No. 29, The University of Kansas Center for Research in Engineering Science, Lawrence, Kansas. Murray, T. M. (1979) “Acceptability Criterion for Occupant-Induced Floor Vibrations.” Sound and Vibration , November, 1979. Murray, T. M. (1991) “Building Floor Vibrations.” Engineering Journal , Third Quarter, 1991. Murray, T. M., Allen, D. E., and Unger, E. E. (1997) “Design Guide - Floor Vibrations Due to Human Activity.” Draft 10/10/96.

Transcript of LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.”...

Page 1: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

54

LIST OF REFERENCES

American Plywood Association (1995). “Design Capacities of APA Performance RatedStructural-Use Panels.” Technical Note N375B.

Australian Standard. Domestic Metal Framing Code, AS3623 (1993). Standards Association ofAustralia, Homebush, NSW.

Band, B. S., Jr. (1996). “Vibration Characteristics of Joist and Joist-Girder Members.” MastersThesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University,Blacksburg, Virginia.

Clough, R. W. (1993). Dynamics of Structures. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, New York.

Hibbitt, Karlson and Sorenson (1984) ABAQUS User’s Manual, Version 4.5. Hibbitt, Karlsonand Sorenson, Inc.

Johnson, J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” MastersThesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University,Blacksburg, Virginia.

Kitterman, S. S. (1994) “Investigation of Several Aspects of the Vibration Characteristics ofSteel Member-Supported Floors.” Masters Thesis, Department ofCivil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia.

Lenzen, K. H. and Dorsett, L. P. (1969) “Effect of the Variation of Structural Parameters on theVibrational Characteristics of Steel Joist-Concrete Slab Floor Systems and Suggested Designs.”Studies in Engineering Mechanics, No. 29, The University of Kansas Center for Research inEngineering Science, Lawrence, Kansas.

Murray, T. M. (1979) “Acceptability Criterion for Occupant-Induced Floor Vibrations.” Soundand Vibration, November, 1979.

Murray, T. M. (1991) “Building Floor Vibrations.” Engineering Journal, Third Quarter, 1991.

Murray, T. M., Allen, D. E., and Unger, E. E. (1997) “Design Guide - Floor Vibrations Due toHuman Activity.” Draft 10/10/96.

Page 2: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

55

LIST OF REFERENCES Continued...

Ohlsson, S. V. (1988a) “Ten Years of Floor Vibration Research - A Review of Aspects and SomeResults.” National Research Council Canada, May 16-18, 1988.

Ohlsson, S. V. (1988b) “Springiness and Human-Induced Floor Vibrations - A Design Guide.”D12:1988, Swedish Council for Building Research, Stockholm, Sweden.

Ohmart, R. D. (1968) “An Approximate Method for the Response of Stiffened Plates toAperiodic Excitation.” Studies in Engineering Mechanics, Report No.30, The University ofKansas Center for Research in Engineering Science, Lawrence, Kansas.

Onysko, D. M. (1985) “Serviceability Criteria For Residential Floors Based on a Field Study ofConsumer Response.” Forintek Canada Corp. Report 03-50-10-008 toCanadian Forestry Service, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Onysko, D. M. (1995) “Some Background on Factors Affecting Performance of Floors andSetting of Performance Criteria.” Task group Meeting, Forintek Canada Corp.

Runte, D. E. (1993) “Fundamental Frequencies of I-Joist, Solid-Sawn Wood Joist, and TrussFloors Based on Tee-Beam Modeling.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering,Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia.

Saksena, S. K. and Murray, T. M. (1972) “Investigation of a Floor Vibration Parameter.” Schoolof Civil Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma.

Shamblin, C. L. (1989) “Floor System Response to Heel-Drop Impact.” Masters Thesis,Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University,Blacksburg, Virginia.

Shue, B. C. (1995) “Some Aspects of Vibration Serviceability in Wood Floor Systems.” MastersThesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University,Blacksburg, Virginia.

Wilson, E. L. and Habibullah, A. (1992) “SAP90 - A Series of Computer Programs for the FiniteElement Analysis of Structures - Structural Analysis User’s Manual.” Computers and Structures,Inc., Berkeley, California.

Page 3: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

56

APPENDIX AMULTI-JOIST FLOOR TEST SUMMARIES

Page 4: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

57

A.1 Description of Materials

Joists 14K1 Steel Bar Joists supplied by Vulcraft Florence, SCWeight = 6.71 plf E = 29,000,000 psi

Sheathing 23/32 Tounge and Groove Oriented Strand BoardWeight = 2.255 psf E = 580,000 psi (axial)

Fasteners 2 in. No. 10 Self Tapping Screws Spaced 6 in. Around Perimeterand 12 in. Along Inside Joist Chords

Diagonal Bracing 1.25 x 1.25 x 0.107 Steel AngleWeight = 1.04 psf (average increase in weight of floor due

to the weight of the bracing)

All floors were built at the Charles E. Via, Jr. Structures and Materials Research Laboratoryusing standard building practices at that time.

A.2 Typical Floor Layout

Page 5: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

58

Table A.1 Multi-Joist Floor System Parameters

Span Joist

Floor Length Spacing Bracing

Designation (ft) (in.) Configuration

16-360H 34.00 16 Horizontal (H)

16-360XH 34.00 16 Cross & Horizontal (XH)

16-360X 34.00 16 Cross (X)

16-480H 31.25 16 Horizontal (H)

16-480XH 31.25 16 Cross & Horizontal (XH)

16-480X 31.25 16 Cross (X)

16-720H 27.29 16 Horizontal (H)

16-720XH 27.29 16 Cross & Horizontal (XH)

16-720X 27.29 16 Cross (X)

24-360H 30.00 24 Horizontal (H)

24-360XH 30.00 24 Cross & Horizontal (XH)

24-360X 30.00 24 Cross (X)

24-480H 27.67 24 Horizontal (H)

24-480XH 27.67 24 Cross & Horizontal (XH)

24-480X 27.67 24 Cross (X)

24-720H 24.50 24 Horizontal (H)

24-720XH 24.50 24 Cross & Horizontal (XH)

24-720X 24.50 24 Cross (X)

Designation: xx-yyaa

Bracing Type

Span - to - Live Load Deflection Ratio

Joist Depth

Page 6: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

59

Table A.2 Measured Data for Multi-Joist Floor Systems

FloorName

FrequencyMeasured at

Midspan

(Hz)

FrequencyMeasured atQuarter Point

(Hz)

MeasuredDeflection*

(in.)

SubjectiveAcceptability

Rating

16-360H 7.81 8.06 0.034 Unacceptable

16-360XH 7.81 8.00 0.026 Unacceptable

16-360X 7.81 8.06 0.030 Unacceptable

16-480H 8.94 9.25 0.028 Unacceptable

16-480XH 9.00 9.75 0.024 Unacceptable

16-480X 8.94 9.81 0.027 Unacceptable

16-720H 10.69 11.13 0.023 Unacceptable

16-720XH 10.75 11.94 0.020 Unacceptable

16-720X 10.75 11.13 0.023 Unacceptable

24-360H 8.94 9.31 0.037 Unacceptable

24-360XH 8.94 9.81 0.030 Unacceptable

24-360X 8.84 9.19 0.032 Unacceptable

24-480H 9.94 10.38 0.030 Unacceptable

24-480XH 9.75 10.03 0.026 Unacceptable

24-480X 9.81 10.13 0.028 Unacceptable

24-720H 11.60 12.00 0.023 Unacceptable

24-720XH 11.56 12.06 0.018 Unacceptable

24-720X 11.50 12.06 0.020 Unacceptable* Due to a 225 lb midspan concentrated load

Page 7: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

60

A.3 Force, Acceleration, Power Spectrum, and Deflection Graphs for Each Floor System

16-360H

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

Fo

rce

(lb

s)

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (

IN/S

^2)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

0 10 20 30 40FREQUENCY Hz

-300

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (

IN/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

0 10 20 30 40FREQUENCY Hz

Page 8: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

61

Walking Parallel to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Walking Perpendicular to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (

IN/S

^2)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

0 10 20 30 40FREQUENCY Hz

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (

IN/S

^2)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

0 10 20 30 40FREQUENCY Hz

Floor Deflection Due to Concentrated Load at MidspanTest Floor 16-360H

-0.04-0.035-0.03

-0.025-0.02

-0.015-0.01

-0.0050

0.005

1 3 5 7 9 11 13

Joist Number

Def

lect

ion

(in.

)

Page 9: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

62

16-360XH

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-300

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-300

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 10: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

63

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16

TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30

FREQUENCY Hz

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 11: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

64

Walking Parallel to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Walking Perpendicular to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Floor Deflection Due to Concentrated Load at MidspanTest Floor 16-360XH

-0.04-0.035-0.03

-0.025-0.02

-0.015-0.01

-0.0050

0.005

1 3 5 7 9 11 13

Joist Number

Def

lect

ion

(in.

)

Page 12: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

65

16-360X

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-300

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 13: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

66

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30

FREQUENCY Hz

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 14: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

67

Walking Parallel to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Walking Perpendicular to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Floor Deflection Due to Concentrated Load at MidspanTest Floor 16-360X

-0.04-0.035-0.03

-0.025-0.02

-0.015-0.01

-0.0050

0.005

1 3 5 7 9 11 13

Joist Number

Def

lect

ion

(in.

)

Page 15: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

68

16-480H

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-300

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 16: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

69

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16

TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30

FREQUENCY Hz

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 17: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

70

Walking Parallel to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Walking Perpendicular to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Floor Deflection Due to Concentrated Load at MidspanTest Floor 16-480H

-0.04-0.035-0.03

-0.025-0.02

-0.015-0.01

-0.0050

0.005

1 3 5 7 9 11 13

Joist Number

Def

lect

ion

(in.

)

Page 18: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

71

16-480XH

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 19: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

72

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16

TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30

FREQUENCY Hz

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 20: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

73

Walking Parallel to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Walking Perpendicular to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Floor Deflection Due to Concentrated Load at MidspanTest Floor 16-480XH

-0.04-0.035-0.03

-0.025-0.02

-0.015-0.01

-0.0050

0.005

1 3 5 7 9 11 13

Joist Number

Def

lect

ion

(in.

)

Page 21: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

74

16-480X

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 22: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

75

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16

TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30

FREQUENCY Hz

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 23: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

76

Walking Parallel to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Walking Perpendicular to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Floor Deflection Due to Concentrated Load at MidspanTest Floor 16-480X

-0.04-0.035-0.03

-0.025-0.02

-0.015-0.01

-0.0050

0.005

1 3 5 7 9 11 13

Joist Number

Def

lect

ion

(in.

)

Page 24: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

77

16-720H

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 25: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

78

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16

TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30

FREQUENCY Hz

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 26: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

79

Walking Parallel to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Walking Perpendicular to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Floor Deflection Due to Concentrated Load at MidspanTest Floor 16-720H

-0.04-0.035-0.03

-0.025-0.02

-0.015-0.01

-0.0050

0.005

1 3 5 7 9 11 13

Joist Number

Def

lect

ion

(in.

)

Page 27: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

80

16-720XH

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-300

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 28: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

81

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16

TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30

FREQUENCY Hz

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 29: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

82

Walking Parallel to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Walking Perpendicular to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Floor Deflection Due to Concentrated Load at MidspanTest Floor 16-720XH

-0.04-0.035-0.03

-0.025-0.02

-0.015-0.01

-0.0050

0.005

1 3 5 7 9 11 13

Joist Number

Def

lect

ion

(in.

)

Page 30: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

83

16-720X

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-300

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 31: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

84

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30

FREQUENCY Hz

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 32: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

85

Walking Parallel to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Walking Perpendicular to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Floor Deflection Due to Concentrated Load at MidspanTest Floor 16-720X

-0.04-0.035-0.03

-0.025-0.02

-0.015-0.01

-0.0050

0.005

1 3 5 7 9 11 13

Joist Number

Def

lect

ion

(in.

)

Page 33: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

86

24-360H

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-300

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 34: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

87

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30

FREQUENCY Hz

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 35: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

88

Walking Parallel to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Walking Perpendicular to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Floor Deflection Due to Concentrated Load at MidspanTest Floor 24-360H

-0.05

-0.04

-0.03

-0.02

-0.01

0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Joist Number

Def

lect

ion

(in.

)

Page 36: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

89

24-360XH

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 37: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

90

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30

FREQUENCY Hz

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 38: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

91

Walking Parallel to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Walking Perpendicular to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Floor Deflection Due to Concentrated Load at MidspanTest Floor 24-360XH

-0.05

-0.04

-0.03

-0.02

-0.01

0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Joist Number

Def

lect

ion

(in.

)

Page 39: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

92

24-360X

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 40: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

93

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30

FREQUENCY Hz

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 41: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

94

Walking Parallel to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Walking Perpendicular to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Floor Deflection Due to Concentrated Load at MidspanTest Floor 24-360X

-0.05

-0.04

-0.03

-0.02

-0.01

0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Joist Number

Def

lect

ion

(in.

)

Page 42: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

95

24-480H

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-400

-300

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-400

-300

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 43: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

96

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30

FREQUENCY Hz

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 44: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

97

Walking Parallel to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Walking Perpendicular to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Floor Deflection Due to Concentrated Load at MidspanTest Floor 24-480H

-0.05

-0.04

-0.03

-0.02

-0.01

0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Joist Number

Def

lect

ion

(in.

)

Page 45: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

98

24-480XH

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-300

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 46: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

99

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30

FREQUENCY Hz

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 47: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

100

Walking Parallel to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Walking Perpendicular to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Floor Deflection Due to Concentrated Load at MidspanTest Floor 24-480XH

-0.05

-0.04

-0.03

-0.02

-0.01

0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Joist Number

Def

lect

ion

(in.

)

Page 48: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

101

24-480X

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-300

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 49: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

102

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30

FREQUENCY Hz

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 50: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

103

Walking Parallel to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Walking Perpendicular to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Floor Deflection Due to Concentrated Load at MidspanTest Floor 24-480X

-0.05

-0.04

-0.03

-0.02

-0.01

0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Joist Number

Def

lect

ion

(in.

)

Page 51: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

104

24-720H

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-300

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 52: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

105

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30

FREQUENCY Hz

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 53: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

106

Walking Parallel to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Walking Perpendicular to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Floor Deflection Due to Concentrated Load at MidspanTest Floor 24-720H

-0.05

-0.04

-0.03

-0.02

-0.01

0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Joist Number

Def

lect

ion

(in.

)

Page 54: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

107

24-720XH

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-300

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 55: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

108

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30

FREQUENCY Hz

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 56: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

109

Walking Parallel to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Walking Perpendicular to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Floor Deflection Due to Concentrated Load at MidspanTest Floor 24-720XH

-0.05

-0.04

-0.03

-0.02

-0.01

0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Joist Number

Def

lect

ion

(in.

)

Page 57: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

110

24-720X

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-300

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 58: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

111

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/4,3/4, Accelerometer @ 1/4,3/4

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30

FREQUENCY Hz

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 59: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

112

Walking Parallel to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Walking Perpendicular to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Floor Deflection Due to Concentrated Load at MidspanTest Floor 24-720X

-0.05

-0.04

-0.03

-0.02

-0.01

0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Joist Number

Def

lect

ion

(in.

)

Page 60: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

113

APPENDIX B

TWO-JOIST FLOOR TEST SUMMARIES

Page 61: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

114

B1 Description of Materials

Joists 14K1 Steel Bar Joists supplied by Vulcraft Florence, SCWeight = 6.71 plf E = 29,000,000 psi

Sheathing 23/32 Tounge and Groove Oriented Strand BoardWeight = 2.255 psf E = 580,000 psi (axial)

Fasteners 2 in. No. 10 Self Tapping Screws at 12 in. Spacing Along JoistChords

Diagonal Bracing 1.25 x 1.25 x 0.107 Steel AngleWeight = 1.04 psf (average increase in weight of floor due

to the weight of the bracing)

Both floors were built at the Charles E. Via, Jr. Structures and Materials Research Laboratoryusing standard building practices at that time.

B2 Midspan Concentrated Load Tests

2J16-720 Span Length = 27.29 (ft)Without Sheating With Sheating

Moment of Inertia From Deflection Test is 59.05 in^4 Moment of Inertia From Deflection Test is 60.91 in^4

2J24-720 Span Length = 24.50 (ft)Without Sheating With Sheating

Moment of Inertia From Deflection Test is 57.60 in^4 Moment of Inertia From Deflection Test is 58.16 in^4

Load vs Deflection

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14

Vertical Deflection (in.)

Loa

d (l

bs)

S. Joist N. Joist Predicted

Load vs Deflection

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14

Vertical Deflection (in.)

Loa

d (l

bs)

S. Joist N. Joist Predicted

Load vs Deflection

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14

Vertical Deflection (in.)

Loa

d (l

bs)

S. Joist N. Joist Predicted

Load vs Deflection

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14

Vertical Deflection (in.)

Loa

d (l

bs)

S. Joist N. Joist Predicted

Page 62: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

115

Table B1 Properties of Two-Joist Floor Systems

Floor System: 2J16-720

Average Measured Properties of Joists

Top Angles Bottom Angles

Depth Length WebDia.

Top Leg BottomLeg

Thickness Top Leg BottomLeg

Thickness

(in.) (ft) (in.) (in.) (in.) (in.) (in.) (in.) (in.)

14 24.50 0.503 1.506 1.507 0.145 1.508 1.506 0.128

Note: Measured properties taken from an average of 8 readings

Calculated Properties of Joist

d Yx Igross L/d Eq. 3.1 Calc. Ieff Meas. Ieff

(in.) (in.) (in.)4 - % Ichords (in.)4 (in.)4

13.15 6.61 67.84 21.00 87.33 59.24 59.05

Floor System: 2J24-720

Average Measured Properties of Joists

Top Angles Bottom Angles

Depth Length WebDia.

Top Leg BottomLeg

Thickness Top Leg BottomLeg

Thickness

(in.) (ft) (in.) (in.) (in.) (in.) (in.) (in.) (in.)

14 27.33 0.502 1.506 1.507 0.140 1.508 1.507 0.123

Note: Measured properties taken from an average of 8 readings

Calculated Properties of Joist

d Yx Igross L/d Eq. 3.1 Calc. Ieff Meas. Ieff

(in.) (in.) (in.)4 - % Ichords (in.)4 (in.)4

13.15 6.61 65.48 23.39 89.08 58.32 57.60

Page 63: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

116

B3. Force, Acceleration, Power Spectrum, and Deflection Graphs for Two-Joist Tests2J16-720Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-300

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-300

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 64: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

117

Walking Parallel to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Walking Parallel to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 65: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

118

2J24-720

Heel Drop 1 Force vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 1 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Heel Drop 2 Acceleration vs Time Plot HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

For

ce (l

bs)

-300

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-300

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 66: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

119

Walking Parallel to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

Walking Parallel to Floor Joists HDS @ 1/2,1/2, Accelerometer @ 1/2,1/2

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

0 4 8 12 16TIME (S)

AC

CE

LE

RA

TIO

N (I

N/S

^2)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 10 20 30FREQUENCY Hz

Page 67: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

120

APPENDIX CSAMPLE CALCULATIONS

Page 68: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

121

C1 Acceptability Criteria

Floor system 24-360H is used for all sample calculations. The floor system properties are listedbelow.

L = 30.00 ft (9.14 m) Ej = 29,000,000 psi (200 x 109 Pa)s = 24 in. (0.610 m) Ef = 580,000 psi (4 x 109 Pa)B = 16.00 ft (4.88 m) tf = 0.7188 in. (18.26 mm)It

* = 58.16 in.4 (2.462 x 10 -5 m4)*f1 = 8.94 Hz *∆meas. = 0.037 in. (0.940 mm)

*Measured results

Equation 1.24 was used to calculate the fundamental frequency of each floor system and thevalues are listed in Table 3.9.

fgEIwL

t= 157 4. = 157386 4 29 000 000 5916

1257 30 00 12

2 4

4 3.( . / )*( , , )*( . )

( . / )*( . ) *( / )in s psi in

lb ft ft in ft = 9.64 (Hz)

Swedish Criterion

Frequency > 8 Hz ?

f1 = 8.94 Hz > 8 Hz ∴ Yes

1) ∆meas. < 1.5 mm ?

∆meas. = 0.940 mm < 1.5 mm ∴ Yes

2) Impulse Velocity Response, h’max

( )

hN

mBL'

. .max =

++

4 0 4 0 6200

40 (m/s/Ns)

Find N40 from charts in “Springiness and Human-Induced Floor Vibrations - A DesignGuide” (Ohlsson 1988a)

N40 cannot be found by this method since L/B and Dy/Dx ratios do not plot on given charts.Therefore h’max cannot be calculated.

3) Continuous Loading Test, W’RMS

wmBL

NfRMS' .=

+100 121 2

2

13ζ

[(m/s)RMS]

Find N1.2 from charts in “Springiness and Human-Induced Floor Vibrations - A Design Guide”(Ohlsson 1988a)

N1.2 cannot be found by this method since L/B and Dy/Dx ratios do not plot on given charts.Therefore W’RMS cannot be calculated.

Page 69: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

122

Australian Criterion

1) Frequency > 8 Hz ?

f1 = 8.94 Hz > 8 Hz ∴ Yes

2) ∆meas. < 1.5 mm ?

∆meas. = 0.940 mm < 1.5 mm∴ Yes

3) Log10(Vmax) < 1.2 + 2σ ?

( )V

NmBLmax

. .=

++

4 0 4 0 6200

40 (m/s/Ns)

N40 = BL

r fr

+ −

2 11

r = Ky/Kx

Kx = E I

sj j =

( ) *( . ).

200 10 0 000024620 610

9 4x Pa mm

= 8,072,000 N-m

Ky =E tf f

3

12 =

( )*( . )4 10 0 0182612

9 3x Pa m= 2029 N-m

r = KK

y

x

=2029

8 072 000N m

N m−

−, , = 0.000251

f = 40/f1 = 40

894.= 4.47

N40 = BL

r fr

+ −

2 11 =

488914

0 000251 4 47 10 000251

12.

.. .

.+ −

= 8.84

( )V

NmBLmax

. .=

++

4 0 4 0 6200

40 = ( )4 0 4 0 6 884

3451 488 914 200. . * .

. * . * .+

+ = 0.0131 (m/s/Ns)

Log10(Vmax) = Log10(0.0131) = 1.88

Calculate 1.2 + 2σ

σ = f1*ζ† = 8.94*0.009 = 0.0805 ∴ 1.2 + 2σ = 1.36

Log10(Vmax) = 1.88 > 1.2 + 2σ = 1.36 ∴ Floor System is Unacceptable

† ζζ is the modal damping ratio. The Australian Code assumes the value 0.9 % and should beused unless other values are proved to be more appropriate.

Page 70: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

123

Canadian Criterion

Midspan Deflection

y8 .0L1.3≤ (mm)

∆required = 8 .0L1.3 =

8 .09 .141.3 = 0.4507 mm (0.018 in.)

y = ∆meas. = 0.914 mm (0.037 in.) > 0.4507 mm ∴ Floor System is Unacceptable

Murray’s Criterion

1) Is f1 < 10 Hz ?

f1 = 8.94. < 10 Hz ∴ Yes

2) D > 35 Ao f + 2.5

Determine Ao

( )A DLFL

EIott

=

*

max60048

3

= ( )11041600 30 00 12

48 29 500 000 5816

3

. **( . * )

*( , , )*( . )

= 0.375 in.

*(DLF)max is found by Figure 1.9From Kitterman Equation, Neff = 3.98 (See Appendix C2)

AANo

ot

eff

= = 0375398..

= 0.0942 in.

Solve for minimum DampingD > 35 Ao f + 2.5 = 35*(0.0942)*(8.94) + 2.5 = 31.98Minimum Damping Required = 31.98 % of CriticalThis level of damping is impractical for these floor systems. Therefore this criteriondoes not apply.

Johnson’s Criterion

f1 > 15 Hz ?

f1 = 8.94 Hz < 15 Hz ∴ Floor System is Unacceptable

Page 71: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

124

C2 Prediction of Deflection

Floor system 24-360H is used for all sample calculations. The floor system properties are listedbelow.

L = 30.00 ft (9.14 m) Ej = 29,000,000 psi (200 x 109 Pa)s = 24 in. (0.610 m) Ef = 580,000 psi (4 x 109 Pa)B = 16.00 ft (4.88 m) tf = 0.7188 in. (18.26 mm)It

* = 58.16 in.4 (2.462 x 10 -5 m4)*f1 = 8.94 Hz *∆meas. = 0.037 in. (0.940 mm)

*Measured results

Load Reduction Factor (Australian Code)

∆ =k PL

E Id

j j

3

48 (m)

k Logkkd

c

b

= −

+

0883 034 04410. . .

kE t L

scf f

=3

312 =

( )*( . ) *( . )*( . )

4 10 0 01826 91412 0 610

9 3

3

x Pa mm mm

= 81,722 (N/m)

kE I

Lbj j

= 3 = ( )*( . )

.200 10 0 0000254

914

9 4

3

x Pa mm

= 6653 (N/m)

k Logd = −

+

0883 034

81 7226653

0 4410. .,

. = 0.507

∆ =k PL

E Id

j j

3

48

( . )*( )*( . )*( , , )*( . )

0507 1 91448 200 000 000 0 0000254

3

4

kN mPa m

= 0.0016 m (0.0625 in.)

∆calc. = 0.0625 in. > ∆meas. = 0.037 in. ∴ Method is very conservative

SJI Equation to Predict Neff

Neff = +

∑1 2

2cos

πxxo

for x ≤ xo

xo = 1.06*ε∗L

Page 72: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

125

ε = DD

x

y

0 25.

Dx = E tf f

3

12 =

( , )*( . )580 000 0 718812

3psi in = 17,950 lb-in.

Dy = E I

sj j =

( , , )*( . )29 000 000 581624

4psi inin

= 70,276,000 lb-in.

ε = 17 950

70 276 000

0 25,, ,

.

= 0.1264

xo = 1.06*ε∗L = 1.06*0.1264*30.00ft*12in./ft = 48.23 in.

Neff = +

∑1 2

2cos

πxxo

= Neff = + +

∑1 2

242 48 23

482 48 23

cos*

* .cos

** .

π π= 2.43

Kitterman Equation to Predict Neff

NdS

xLI

LSeff

e

t= + + −

−0 4898 3419 8 99 10 0 00059394 2

. . . .

N xeff = + + −

−0 4898 34190 7188

24899 10

30 125816

0 00059330 12

249

4 2

. ..

.( * )

..

* = 3.98

Limitations:

0.18 ≤ DS

e < 0.208 0.018 ≤ 07188

24.

= 0.03 < 0.208 ∴ OK

4.5x106 ≤ LIt

4

≤ 257x106 4.5x106 ≤ ( . * )

.30 00 12

5816

4

= 289x106 ≥ 257x106 ∴ No Good

2 < LS

< 30 2 < 30 00 12

24. *

= 15 < 30 ∴ OK

If Limitations are Ignored, Then Neff = 3.98 By Kitterman’s MethodNote: Limitations on Kitterman’s Method were Ignored

Page 73: LIST OF REFERENCES J. R. (1994) “Vibration Acceptability of Floors Under Impact Vibration.” Masters Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

126

VITA

Alaric Lee Anderson

Alaric L. Anderson was born in Hattiesburg, MS on April 12, 1973. He was raised in Sumrall,MS and graduated from Columbia Academy in 1991. He attended the University of SouthernMississippi for two years and then Mississippi State University for two years where he received aBachelor of Science Degree in Civil Engineering in 1995. In August 1995 he entered graduateschool in the Structures Division of Civil Engineering at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and StateUniversity. In May 1997, he will receive his Masters of Science Degree in Civil Engineering atVirginia Tech. He will begin work as a design engineer for Ferrell Engineering in Birmingham,AL in April 1997.