List of Nominations Connecting User Needs with Weather Research and Forecasts Rebecca E. Morss...
-
Upload
nehemiah-tock -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of List of Nominations Connecting User Needs with Weather Research and Forecasts Rebecca E. Morss...
List of Nominations List of Nominations
Connecting User Needs with Weather Research and Forecasts
Rebecca E. Morss
National Center for Atmospheric Research
Boulder, Colorado, USA
List of Nominations List of Nominations
Overall Goals
• Understand:– Weather forecasting needs of current and potential users
of forecasts– How people do and could incorporate weather forecasts
into decision-making
• Connect this understanding with weather research and forecasts:– Compare benefits of different forecast improvements– Work towards improving forecasts in ways that are likely
to greatly benefit society – And so on …
List of Nominations List of Nominations
Projects
• Assessing the needs of users of QPF (Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts)
• Use of weather information by QPF forecasters and users during PACJET-2001
• Influence of weather and climate variability on evaluations of flood risk
• Superstorm 1993: A case scenario approach for integrating meteorological and societal research
List of Nominations List of Nominations
Systematically, comprehensively assess the needs of users of QPF
• Improving QPF has been identified as a national (and international) priority
• QPF can be improved in a number of wayse.g., lead time, accuracy, spatial / temporal resolution,
deterministically or probabilistically
• Achieving different QPF improvements can require different research and operational efforts
Which QPF improvements should we invest in, to most benefit society?
List of Nominations List of Nominations
Assessing the needs of users of QPF
Focus for this pilot project:
• Warm season (approx. May - September)
• Lead time: minutes - days
• Users: Colorado Front Range (including Denver, Boulder) and surrounding areas
List of Nominations List of Nominations
To systematically investigate how QPFs are and could be used, across society:
• Identify (all) major users of QPF
• Review and synthesize relevant literature
• Interview “stakeholders”
• Survey selected user communities
Methodology
List of Nominations List of Nominations
Sectors of Potential QPF Users
• Flood / landslide warning, control, and response • Water supply and reservoir management• Hydropower generation and power plant cooling• Environmental quality• Agriculture• Livestock production• Recreation / leisure • Fire management
• Transportation• Construction• Mining• Public
List of Nominations List of Nominations
Literature Review• Purpose:
– Develop a baseline knowledge of precipitation impacts and QPF use in each sector
– Identify an appropriate mix of interviewees– Construct appropriate interview questions
• Includes:– Peer-reviewed literature (meteorology, hydrology, etc.) – Existing studies of use and value of weather and climate
information– Conference proceedings – Instructional materials – Overview documents – Web searches
List of Nominations List of Nominations
Stakeholder Interviews
• Producers of QPF e.g., U.S. National Weather Service forecasters
private sector forecasters
• Intermediariese.g., U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (River Sys & Met
group)agricultural extension services
• Users of QPF in each sectorindividuals, e.g., flood warning personnelgroup representatives, e.g., farming associations
List of Nominations List of Nominations
Stakeholder Interviews• Purpose:
– To develop a more complete, more detailed understanding of current and potential QPF use in each sector
– To test hypotheses and modify knowledge developed from the literature review and previous interviews
• Interviewees selected to represent a range of perspectives, rather than to obtain a statistically representative sample
– If necessary, follow up with a mail/e-mail survey
• Conducted in this order (to the extent possible) to help identify interviewees and refine questions for subsequent interviews
List of Nominations List of Nominations
Examples of possible uses of results
• Develop user-relevant measures of forecast quality
• Estimate costs of precipitation-related events to society
• Estimate socioeconomic value of different forecasts
• Compare costs and benefits of different forecasting system improvements
• Identify subsectors, impacts, event types, forecast types, etc. to study in greater detail
• Develop societally beneficial forecast products and decision tools
• Develop the research programs required to generate these products and tools
List of Nominations List of Nominations
Projects
• Assessing the needs of users of QPF (Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts)
• Use of weather information by QPF forecasters and users during PACJET-2001
• Influence of weather and climate variability on evaluations of flood risk
• Superstorm 1993: A case scenario approach for integrating meteorological and societal research
List of Nominations List of Nominations
Use of weather information by QPF forecasters and users during PACJET-2001
• Pacific Land-falling Jets Experiment, Jan – Feb 2001• Goal: to improve short-term winter weather forecasts on
the U.S. West Coast, with an emphasis on QPF
• To explore use of PACJET-related observations and forecasts:
– Interviewed and observed National Weather Service meteorological and hydrological forecasters
– Interviewed several emergency managers and water resource personnel in California
• Results: Maps of use of information in decision-making
List of Nominations List of Nominations
Influence of weather and climate variability on evaluations of flood risk
• Evaluations of flood risk (e.g., floodplain maps) are based on estimates of future precipitation and flood discharge
• In mountainous regions (e.g., Colorado Front Range), such estimates are especially uncertain because:
– Precipitation tends to vary significantly (in space & time)
– Watersheds tend to be small and to respond rapidly
– Available data is insufficient to account for this variability
• Goal: To provide weather / climate information and analysis techniques that are useful in flood risk evaluations
List of Nominations List of Nominations
• On 12-15 March 1993, a major winter storm affected 26 eastern U.S. states, Cuba, and eastern Canada
• “Superstorm 1993” caused, in U.S.: approximately 270 deaths, over $2 billion in property damage, power outages, major transportation delays, economic disruption, etc.
However, many of these impacts are “unavoidable”
• Using Superstorm 1993 as a focusing case, explore
– Potential for improving different types of forecasts of such storms (e.g., increase lead time, ensemble forecasts)
– Potential value of such improvements to society
Superstorm 1993: Integrating meteorological and societal research
List of Nominations List of Nominations Questions?