P13 · 1400 1200 800 600 . Title: P13 Created Date: 12/14/2017 6:14:48 PM
Lisl p13
-
Upload
lisl-kotheimer -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
4
description
Transcript of Lisl p13
2013
Port
folio
Lisl
Kot
heim
er
l i s l k o t h e i m e r . c o m
2 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3
ProfileAcademicMontaudran Aerospace CampusNeokoolhismsSurface DeepProximity FieldAirport LandscapeLandscape of CommodityProfessionalUniversity Circle West GatewayFox Riverfront
0507081624323844505256
Lisl KotheimerPortfolio2013
3C o n t e n t s
4 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3
ProfileEducation2010-2012
2003-2007
Professional2011
2008-2010
2007-2008
2007
Instructional2012-2013
2012
2011-2012
Harvard University - Cambridge, MassachusettsGraduate School of DesignMaster of Landscape ArchitectureMLA II - 3 semester post professional degree
Ohio State University - Columbus, OhioAustin E. Knowlton School of ArchitectureBachelor of Science in Landscape Architecture
Landworks Studio - Summer Intern - Boston, Massachusetts
MKSK - Project Designer - Columbus, Ohio
Stoss Landscape Urbanism - Project Designer - Boston, Massachusetts
NBBJ - Project Designer - Columbus, Ohio
Lecturer - The Ohio State University - Austin E. Knowlton School of ArchitectureLRCH 3940: Design IV - Landscape Ecology and PlanningLRCH 2410: Workshop I - Analysis and CommunicationLRCH 2930: Design III - Social DynamicsLRCH 3440: Workshop IV - Advanced Landscape Technologies
Career Discovery Program - Harvard Graduate School of DesignDesign Representation Instructor
Teaching Fellow - Harvard Graduate School of DesignGSD 1211: Digital Topography Lab - MLA 3rd Semester Weekly Workshop
Teaching Assistant - Harvard Graduate School of DesignGSD 2142: Representation II - MLA Core CurriculumGSD 6243: Ecologies, Techniques, Technologies V - MLA Core CurriculumGSD 2322: Landscape as Digital Media - ElectiveGSD 1407: Landscape Morphologies - Studio OptionGSD 1112: Landscape Architecture II - Core Studio
5P r o f i l e
6
AcademicHarvard Graduate School of Design 2010-2012
7
8 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3
The City of Toulouse sits at the foot of the Pyrenees Mountains along the Garonne River. The site, located a kilometer outside of downtown Toulouse, is the abandoned Montaudran airport, a single runway with a rich history that runs parallel to the Canal du Midi and is adjacent to a thriving academic and research district known as “Aerospace Valley.” The purpose of the project is to transform the 60 hectare site into a mixed-use development and a metropolitan park. The strategy is to employ topographic models as a system for generating urban and ecological transformation -- activating a framework that is contextually and culturally relevant to the city of Toulouse and the larger region. The site will be a dynamic landscape that fosters a continuous and rich dialogue between topography, ecology, water, program and culture.
GSD1407: Studio Option, Spring 2011Critic: Philippe Coignetof O-L-M, Paris, FranceSite: Montaudran Aerospace Campus, Toulouse, France
Montaudran Aerospace Campus
Opposite: CNC milled model; conceptual framework for water conveyance and storage
9A c a d e m i c - M o n t a u d r a n A e r o s p a c e C a m p u s
Below: Site analysis, programmatic adjacencies
Opposite: Context maps are based off of aeronautical charts,
where relevant information appears according to altitude /
scale of map
10 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3
11A c a d e m i c - M o n t a u d r a n A e r o s p a c e C a m p u s
12 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3
Opposite: Perspectives of contingent developments situated within the topographic framework
Below: Site sections of the academic campus
13A c a d e m i c - M o n t a u d r a n A e r o s p a c e C a m p u s
14 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3
Topographical analysisof CNC milled model
15A c a d e m i c - M o n t a u d r a n A e r o s p a c e C a m p u s
16 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3
GSD1507: Studio Option, Spring 2012Critic: Ciro Najleof General Design Bureau, Buenos Aries, ArgentinaSiteless
Neokoolhisms
Using Rem Koolhaas’s 1978 publication, Delirious New York, as a lens for exploring contemporary forms of urban development, this project imagines a new language for the generation of territorial-scale anti-urban models -- or neokoolhisms.
Specific focus is placed on the economically subserviant satellite cities of natural resource extraction industries. Geographically isolated and often spurious, these cities have unique economic, political, and social characteristics as well as the expectation of varying degrees of finality.
Instead of portraying nature, this project is a tale that begins with the pragmatic conjectures of the businessman who invests in the extraction industry. This half-fairy tale describes the growth of the satellite city, where real-life political and economic objectives coalesce in an unconscious agglomeration of sensation and heightened perception.
Perspective view of generic satellite city
17A c a d e m i c - N e o k o o l h i s m s
00
0203
04
10
05 06
11 12
07
01
0809
1415
21
22
2313
20
19
1817
16
24
2526
27
28
36
29
37
38
39
30
40
4142
4948
47
68
46
5756
45
63
64
7069
55
54
62
53
35
52
51
43
33 34
44
31
32
50
59
61
60
6566
67
68
S1 = ChannelV1 = Divide Distance [DD]V2 = Offset Distance [OD]V3 = Circle Max Radius [MR]V4 = Closest Islands [CL]Island Accretion
L I S L K O T H E I M E R * J E F F R E Y B U T C H E R T H E R I V E R , T H E M O U N TA I N & T H E M E T R O P O L I S
64 65
The Grid -- or [the accretion] of the metropolitan territory into maximum increments of [paradise] describes an archipelago of ‘cities within cities.’
MAP OF THE WORLD2500MOM
C H A P T E R O N E
L I S L K O T H E I M E R * J E F F R E Y B U T C H E R T H E R I V E R , T H E M O U N TA I N & T H E M E T R O P O L I S
02 03
PrefaceA HALF FAIRY TALE
The WorldDubai, UAE
Qianhai PortChina - OMA
Long Tan ParkChina - MVRDV
ErenhotMongolia
KarathaAustralia
El SalvadorChile - Niemeyer
Al AhmadiKuwait City, Kuwait
ChenggongChina
Oyu TolgoiMongolia
DubailandDubai, UAE
SandoupingChina
ChambishiZambia
KaramayChina
King AbdullahSaudi Arabia
Salar de UyuniBolivia
AshioJapan
PreconditionsONCE UPON A TIME
Chapter OneA PLACE NO ONE CALLS HOME
Chapter FiveTH IS STOP IS ONLY TEMPORARY
Chapter TwoDESTRUCTION HAS NO MEMORY -- ONE LIKES TO TH INK
Chapter SixAT THE EDGE -- WHO’S IN CHARGE?
Chapter ThreeA PROMISE TOLD AND NOT YET KEPT
Chapter SevenMAJESTIC SYMBOL IN THE DESERT
Chapter FourFOR VISITORS, THE STREETS COME ALIVE
Chapter EightALTERNATE END INGS
Appendix IMODELS
Appendix IIGENERIC MODEL
Notes
TA B L E O F C O N T E N T S
A HALF-FAIRY-TALE
PrefaceTable of Contents
Rem Koolhaas’s 1978 publication, Delirious New York - “...it untangles theories, tactics and dissimulations to establish the desires of Manhattan’s collective unconscious as realities in the Grid.”
Using Rem Koolhaas’s 1978 publication, Delirious New York
(DNY), as a lens for exploring contemporary forms of urban devel-
opment, this project imagines a new language for the generation of
territorial-scale anti-urban models -- or neokoolhisms.
Specific focus is placed on the economically subservient satellite cit-
ies of natural resource extraction industries and new cities emerging
from the wealth created by such commodities. Geographically iso-
lated and often spurious, these cities have unique economic, politi-
cal, and social characteristics as well as the expectation of varying
degrees of finality.
This is a tale that begins with the pragmatic conjectures of the busi-
nessman who invests in the extraction industry. This half-fairy-tale
describes the growth of the satellite city as it approaches the imagi-
nary -- where the city progresses into a state of unconsciousness.
Each chapter is designed as a typological case study of two cities,
and the tale is constructed based on commonalities and relation-
ships between economic, political, social, and developmental char-
acteristics of individual cases. Each chapter ultimately relays the
18 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3
Project spreads: the project explores eight case studies by reducing urban form to its fundamental geometries and relationships. By drawing information from the case studies a new satellite city is constructed using associative modeling.
L I S L K O T H E I M E R * J E F F R E Y B U T C H E R
150 151
T H E R I V E R , T H E M O U N TA I N & T H E M E T R O P O L I S A P P E N D I X I IG E N E R I C M O D E L
THE WORLD FRAMEWORK
DIVISION = 256M
OFFSET = 190M
THE WORLD FRAMEWORK
RADIUS = 0 to 153M [varies]
12KM0KM 12KM0KM
0001020304050607080910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970
MRODDD CI
R = 0R = 0 R = -5R = 5
R = -15R = 15
R = -25R = 25
T H E R I V E R , T H E M O U N TA I N & T H E M E T R O P O L I S
67
L I S L K O T H E I M E R * J E F F R E Y B U T C H E R
66
M O D E L - T H E W O R L D
2500M 2500M0M 0M
A P P E N D I X I
Divide Distance [DD] = 147
Offset Distance [OD] = 247
Circle Max Radius [MR] = 147
Closest Islands [CI] = variable
MODEL
19A c a d e m i c - N e o k o o l h i s m s
Above: Perspective view of generic satellite city looking
toward the metropolis
Opposite: Perspective view of satellite city looking toward the
mountains
20 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3
21A c a d e m i c - N e o k o o l h i s m s
Physical model: laser cut museum board
22 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3
23A c a d e m i c - N e o k o o l h i s m s
Photos by Martin Bond and Asensio-Mah
24 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3
Harvard GSD and Asensio-Mahfor the International Garden Festival, 2011 EditionReford Gardens, Grand-Métis, Quebec, CanadaGSD Students: Day Jimenez, Mariela Alvarez, Lisl Kotheimer, Somkiet Chokvijtkul, Daekwon Park, Benjamin Winters, Yuan Zhan, Fred Chung, Troy Vaughn, Benjamin Tew, Victor PerezamadoConsultants: AKT Engineering, Bryophyta Technologies
Surface Deep Surface Deep is a new entry sequence for the visitors to the International Garden Festival in Grand-Métis. Revisiting the garden wall, an element that has been a consistent expressive element within the history of gardening, the wall is augmented and transformed to form a ribbon surface that constructs new associations, expressions and functions for the entry sequence. Its undulating form is a response and gesture for a new entry sequence which also embeds an experimental moss surface that fl ips between a wall, a ground, and a cover, while creating multiple orientations and microclimates for the living material. Surface Deep constructs a new way to meander, as well as gather at the entry of the gardens, while secretly enveloping a multiply oriented garden, enveloped within its surface depth.
25A c a d e m i c - S u r f a c e D e e p
26 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3
In the Fall of 2010, Alexander Reford asked the Harvard GSD to develop the garden for the 2011 edition of the International Garden Festival. Beginning in the Spring 2011 semester and advised by GSD faculty members Leyre Asensio-Villoria and David Mah, students were asked to develop prototypes that could be fabricated with extensive use of the Harvard GSD’s Fabrication Laboratory. Emphasis was placed on the development of variable and modular structures that could simultaneously perform a multiplicity of functions such as surfaces, seating, shade structures, or planters while providing a cohesive vision for the 10-meter by 20-meter garden plot. For several weeks, the team researched a variety of typologies, geometries, and construction techiques until a decision was made to move forward with the development of the ribbon-like garden wall.
The wall was fabricated at the Harvard GSD, partially assembled, then shipped to Grand-Métis to be fully installed.
Opposite: Preliminary studies for walls and screens; 1-5, complex modular screens; 6, Weaire-Phelan wall; 7-8, transitioning surface or screen
27A c a d e m i c - S u r f a c e D e e p
28 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3
Opposite: mock-up of structural components at the Harvard GSD
Top: mock-up of screens and ‘moss trays’ at the Harvard GSD
29A c a d e m i c - S u r f a c e D e e p
30 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3
Opposite: screen detail of Surface Deep installed at Reford Gardens, summer 2011
Top: structural detail of Surface Deep installed at Reford Gardens, summer 2011
Photos by Martin Bond and Asensio-Mah
31A c a d e m i c - S u r f a c e D e e p
32 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3
GSD2444: Advanced Landscape as Digital MediaCritic: David MahStudents: Marcus Owens, Lisl Kotheimer
Proximity Field
33A c a d e m i c - P r o x i m i t y F i e l d
The design team developed a garden prototype as a means to explore digital design tools such as 3-D modeling, parametric tools, and digital fabrication methods. The focused project, Proximity Field, is a performative landscape system where topographical conditions and the orientation of a field of components are defined by the manipulation of a set of curves. The model easily generates infinite topographical and surface organizations, and the physical representation projects the dynamism of the surface and its constituent field. The flowing form invites the possibility of applications that will function beyond the expectations of the static garden.
Fabrication of the final model was a multi-step process. A surface was created with a 3-axis mill. The 6-axis ABS robot was required to dril l a grid of holes at various angles on the milled surface to receive the field of components. The individual components, each with unique proportions, were laser cut and numbered to have a precise orientation accross the milled surface.
34 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3
Top: The ABS robot at work in the Harvard GSD Fabrication Lab
Bottom: The laser-cut components layed out on a template to be glued and painted
35A c a d e m i c - P r o x i m i t y F i e l d
36 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3
37A c a d e m i c - P r o x i m i t y F i e l d
<W E>
N><S
DEER I.
SNAKE I.LOGAN INTERNATIONALAIRPORT
CASTLE I.
THOMPSON I.
MOON I.
NUT I.BUMPKIN I.
SPECTACLE I.
LONG I.
GALLOPS I.
GEORGES I.
LOVELLS I.
GREAT BREWSTER I.
MIDDLE BREWSTER I.
OUTER BREWSTER I.CALF I.
GREEN I.
GRAPE I.SLATE I.
RAINSFORD I.
PEDDOCKS I.
38 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3
GSD1403: Studio Option, Fall 2010Critics: Eelco Hooftman, Bridget Bainesof GROSS.MAX., Edinburgh, ScotlandSite: Boston, Massachusetts
Airport Landscape
The Boston Harbor islands are part of a regional landscape that extends from the outer-most islands in the Boston Bay well into the metropolitan area of Boston. This entire landscape was formed by retreating glaciers, leaving a rare condition of a drumlin field intersecting the coast. Most of the islands are partially drowned drumlins with a few of the outer islands being glacially scored bedrock. Throughout the city ’s history the harbor islands served many different functions: as a commodity, as urban infrastructure, and as a recreational destination. As the island geomorphology extends into East Boston, Somerville, Revere, and Chelsea it is marked with parks and monuments and occupied by a variety of public institutions, collective uses that were prescribed by Charles Eliot in the late 19th century. Today, the harbor islands are protected as a National Recreation Area and primarily serve as a welcome mat for passenger aircraft arriving at Logan International Airport.
As the airport intersects the drumlin field the geomorphological features of the Boston Bay disappear into 2400 acres of flat and featureless infrastructural domain. The aspiration of this project is to restore the landscape heritage and cultural connection to this highly inaccessible infrastructural landscape that is situated central to downtown Boston and its waterfront.
The project begins by recovering Noddles and Governors islands as strategic intermediary nodes in the local greenway and transportation network. This begins to engage the airport with East Boston and the inter-island ferry system.Opposite: Perspective of Logan
Airport; Geomorphological identity of the Boston Harbor Islands
39A c a d e m i c - A i r p o r t L a n d s c a p e
The airfield outfall zone, the largest and least accessible region of the airport property becomes an opportunity for strategic intervention. With the airport situated where three regional watersheds converge and empty into the Boston Harbor, water quality, in correspondence with the operations of the airport is of utmost importance to the Massachusetts Port Authority.
By referring to airport design guidelines, under-performing zones throughout the airfield are identified within the efficiently functioning infrastructural framework. A cut and fil l operation begins to restore the geomorphological character of the site while providing an opportunity for stormwater fi ltration and the removal of the most threatening chemical contaminants from the airfield outfall zone.
Above: Lost islands of East Boston and Logan Airport
Opposite: Perspective of the New Governor’s Island
40 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3
41A c a d e m i c - A i r p o r t L a n d s c a p e
42 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3
Governor’s Island and the inter-island ferry system
43A c a d e m i c - A i r p o r t L a n d s c a p e
Independent Research, Fall 2011Advisor: Chris Reedof Stoss Landscape UrbanismSite: Greater Las Vegas, Nevada
Landscape of Commodity
In the next 25 years the Las Vegas Valley will experience a population increase of as much as half a mill ion people. Although this is a modest projection compared to those made prior to 2008, any amount of growth in the Valley will require governments to seek additional water resources tosupport the urban population. The region subsists due to its growth-and-development-driven economy, typically seeing the population double every 10 years, but with a current population of about 2 mill ion, the urban region is barely meeting its water needs. Therefore, any future growth will require a corresponding change in water resources.
44 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3
45A c a d e m i c - L a n d s c a p e o f C o m m o d i t y
Instead of implementing more stringent water conservation measures at a local scale, the Southern Nevada Water Authority is favoring exploitation of far-away resources with the Groundwater Development Project. The Water Authority looks to increase supplies to meet the needs of the future population, incidentally, providing enough resources for developers to build as many as 200,000 new homes in the region. While supporting the long-standing growth-driven economy of the Las Vegas Valley, the Groundwater Development Project prolongs a paradoxical relationship between the Valley ’s economic mainstay and its lack of water resources. The financial and ecological implications ofthe project are potentially vast, while its long-term value to the urban population is uncertain.
The current situation in the Las Vegas Valley suggests that growth and development practices must be reorganized to meet the needs and expectations of developers, governments, and the urban population, while maintaining the value of ecological systems within the Valley and beyond. This research looks to reorganize the components that make up the physical environment of the Las Vegas Valley, including private development, infrastructure, and ecological systems, to produce more resilient and sustainable development typologies that are focused on water conservation.
Below: The water resource cycle of the Las Vegas Valley with over
200,000 afy allocated through return-flow credits
Opposite: The Valley currently draws its water resources from
a vast region. The Colorado River Compact designates
300,000 afy to Southern Nevada. The proposed Groundwater Development Project would expand the footprint of the
urban region, affecting 8 major sub-surface flow systems and all
78 basins of the Central Basin and Range ecoregion.
46 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3
Regulating Tank
Pressure Reducing Station
Primary Substation
Regulating Tank
Multi-Facility
Water Treatment Facility
Silverhawk Generating Station
Pumping StationSecondary Substation
Pumping Station
Secondary Substation
Gondor Substation
Pumping Station
Secondary Substation
Multi-Facility
Regulating TankPumping Station
Regulating Tank
Secondary SubstationPumping Station
Pressure Reducing Station
Regulating Tank
MunicipalWater Source
Colorado River510,000 AFY - 90%
Las Vegas Valley Groundwater43,000 AFY - 10%
Water DemandsFuture Scenario
Arizona Bank + Augmentation50,000 AFY - 7%
Las Vegas Valley Groundwater43,000 AFY - 6%
Muddy / Virgin Rivers + Coyote Springs30,000 AFY - 5%
Colorado RiverX% - 510,000 AFY
In-State Groundwater Resources7% - 50,000 AFY
MunicipalMetered Water Use
Commercial / Industrial14.4%
Resorts6.3%
Schools / Government Parks5%
Common Areas5.2%
Other2.5%
Residential59%
WATER RESOURCESFOR THE 21st CENTURY
In the Las Vegas Valley, the resource of highest concern is water. The region currently relies on the Colorado River to provide 90% of its water resources -- the remainder is drawn from a shallow aquifer through municipal and private wells. The Colorado River Compact of 1920 apportions 300,000 afy to Southern Nevada. The Southern Nevada Water Authority treats and returns 210,000 afy of effluent, allowing a total withdrawal of 510,000 afy from the Colorado River through a system of return-flow credits.
Expecting that in the next 25 years there will only be a slight decline in per-capita water usage, the Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA) is currently
pursuing the development of groundwater resources located hundreds of miles away in Spring, Cave, Delamar, Dry Lake, and Snake valleys. The purpose of the SNWA Groundwater Development Project (GDP) is to diversify the re-gion’s water resources and to meet the projected needs of the growing popula-tion. If completed, the project will consist of over 300 miles of subsurface pipeline and the necessary facilities for pumping, filtering, and conveying up to 176,655 afy of water to its recipients in Clark and Lincoln counties. Although in a preliminary planning stage, the project is estimated to cost between $3.6 billion and as much as $15 billion.1 2 The SNWA is currently pursuing the right
of way for the main pipeline, which will be routed along a new energy corridor, primarily traversing land that is managed by the BLM.
Critics believe that the GDP will threaten aquatic ecosystems, including many endemic species, in the Central Basin and Range ecoregion and cause perma-nent land subsidence. These arguments against the project are extremely apt: in 1957 and 1958, during the Las Vegas Valley’s most rapid period of growth, similar groundwater harvesting dried up springs and drained the region’s distinctive wetlands and meadows. The only remnant of the landscape from which the Valley takes its name is the Las Vegas Wash – a channelized and
intensified waterway fed by urban stormwater and discharge from municipal wastewater treatment facilities.3
Furthermore, the history and politics of groundwater harvesting bring another complicated dimension to the SNWA GRP. The legal rules govern-ing groundwater use typically reward those who exploit the resource while the consequences of over-use are absorbed by the larger population.4 The SNWA’s proposal will tap into a regional carbonate aquifer that extends from Death Valley to Salt Lake City, an ecologically robust region that is scattered with many federally protected parks and wildlife refuges. Fundamentally, this
increases the number of stakeholders in the GDP, and out of purely economic necessity, the project ignores the reality that water is a limited resource and that redistributing and rerouting it at a large scale will most certainly create problems elsewhere. Characteristic of any large-scale infrastructural proposal, the politics, cost, and negative ecological impact that the GDP promises may ultimately lead to its renunciation as a feasible option for sustaining future development in the Las Vegas Valley. This reality suggests that governments must investigate other strategies that will appeal to the urban population with-out the the high financial and ecological risks of the GDP.
2,850,000 AFY>ARIZONA
1,500,000 AFYMEXICO<
840,000 AFY>NEW MEXICO
3,860,000 AFY>COLORADO
1,040,000 AFY>WYOMING
$3.5 BILLIONPROPOSED SNWA GROUNDWATER
DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
ALLOCATIONSCOLORADO RIVER COMPACT (1922)
SYSTEMSOUTHERN NEVADA WATER AUTHORITY
270,000 AFY>SOUTHERN NEVADA
300,000 AFYSOUTHERN NEVADA<
4,400,000 AFYCALIFORNIA<
CENTRAL BASIN AND RANGEThe Central Basin and Range ecoregion is internally drained and is characterized by a mosaic of xeric basins, scattered low and high mountains, and salt flats. It has a hotter and drier climate, more shrubland, and more mountain ranges than the Northern Basin and Range (80) ecoregion to the north. Basins are covered by Great Basin sagebrush or saltbush-greasewood vegetation that grow in Aridisols; cool season grasses are less common than in the Mollisols of the Snake River Plain (12) and Northern Basin and Range. The region is not as hot as the Mojave Basin and Range (14) ecoregion to the south and it has a greater percent of land that is grazed.
MOJAVE BASIN AND RANGEThis ecoregion contains broad basins and scattered mountains that are generally lower, warmer, and drier, than those of the Central Basin and Range (13). Its creosote bush-dominated shrub community is distinct from the saltbush–greasewood and sagebrush–grass associations that occur to the north in the Central Basin and Range (13) and Northern Basin and Range (80); it is also differs from the palo verde–cactus shrub and saguaro cactus that occur in the Sonoran Basin and Range (81) to the south. Most of this region is federally owned and grazing is constrained by the lack of water and forage for livestock. Heavy use of off-road vehicles and motorcycles in some areas has made the soils susceptible to wind and water erosion.
47A c a d e m i c - L a n d s c a p e o f C o m m o d i t y
$3.5 BILLION
Regulating Tank
Pressure Reducing Station
Primary Substation
Regulating Tank
Multi-Facility
Water Treatment Facility
Silverhawk Generating Station
Pumping StationSecondary Substation
Pumping Station
Secondary Substation
Gondor Substation
Pumping Station
Secondary Substation
Multi-Facility
Regulating TankPumping Station
Regulating Tank
Secondary SubstationPumping Station
Pressure Reducing Station
Regulating Tank
SOUTHERN NEVADA WATER AUTHORITYGROUNDWATER DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
LAS VEGASVALLEY
MunicipalWater Source
Colorado River510,000 AFY - 90%
Las Vegas Valley Groundwater43,000 AFY - 10%
Water DemandsFuture Scenario
Arizona Bank + Augmentation50,000 AFY - 7%
Las Vegas Valley Groundwater43,000 AFY - 6%
Muddy / Virgin Rivers + Coyote Springs30,000 AFY - 5%
Colorado RiverX% - 510,000 AFY
In-State Groundwater Resources7% - 50,000 AFY
MunicipalMetered Water Use
Commercial / Industrial14.4%
Resorts6.3%
Schools / Government Parks5%
Common Areas5.2%
Other2.5%
Residential59%
48 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3
APEXPopulation: n/aEconomy: Energy, Waste, Mining
CALIENTEPopulation: 1,123Established: Railroad townEconomy: Tourism, Parks + Recreation
US-93
I-80
I-80
US-93
PIOCHEPopulation: 900Established: Mining TownEconomy: Tourism,Parks + Recreation
BAKERPopulation: 68Established: TourismEconomy: Parks + Recreation
ELYPopulation: 4255Established: Stagecoach TownEconomy: Copper mining,Tourism, Parks + Recreation
LAS VEGAS
SilverhawkGeneratingStation
GondorSubstation
RobinsonSummitSubstation
500Kv
500Kv
230Kv
Far Left: Water resources and applications
Above: The Groundwater Development Project and related infrastructure
49A c a d e m i c - L a n d s c a p e o f C o m m o d i t y
50
ProfessionalUniversity Circle West GatewayMSI Design 2010
Fox RiverfrontStoss Landscape Urbanism 2008
51
52 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3
Cleveland, OhioUniversity Circle IncorporatedMSI Design, 2010Design Team: Keith Meyers, Jeff Pongonis, Lisl Kotheimer
University CircleWest Gateway
53P r o f e s s i o n a l - U n i v e r s i t y C i r c l e W e s t G a t e w a y
1” Thick Acrylic SurfaceColor: Vapor (White)Finish: Renewable MatteHeat-Formed Rectangular Shape
Horizontal Scoring / Etched Surface
Acrylic Surface Bolted to Aluminum Frame
Internally illuminated w/ LED ‘puck’ lightWhite or RGB
Aluminum FramePowdercoatMinimum Width to provide Structural Support
1” Thick Acrylic SurfaceColor: Vapor (White)Finish: Renewable MatteFlat Surface w/ CNC Cut Shape
Horizontal Scoring / Etched Surface
Acrylic Surface Bolted to Aluminum Frame
Internally illuminated w/ LED ‘puck’ lightWhite or RGB
Aluminum FramePowdercoat
“As part of the Euclid Gateway Vision grant, UCI is committed to highlighting the Western gateway into the neighborhood and the site of the original University Circle, from which the area takes its name. A series of custom designed, sculptural l ighting elements will trace the path of the original circle, and integrated benches will mark the location of interpretive elements that will recall the rich history of transportation through the region.”
-University Circle 2010 Annual Report
The lighting elements are not to appear as an addition to the sign posts, power lines, and traffic signals that are characteristic of the busy intersection in downtown Cleveland. The design team researched many materials for the lighting elements including wood, metal, and plastic until a translucent resin was selected for its subtlety during the day and unique ability to distribute light evenly when i l luminated.
Concept A Assembly
Photo provided by University Circle Incorporated
Concept B Assembly
54 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3
55P r o f e s s i o n a l - U n i v e r s i t y C i r c l e W e s t G a t e w a y
56 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3
Green Bay, WisconsinCity of Green Bay Department of Public WorksStoss Landscape Urbanism, 2008Design Team: Chris Reed, Scott Bishop, Jill Desimini, Lisl Kotheimer
Fox Riverfront The Fox Riverfront is a unique public surface -- a performance space for the City of Green Bay. The new riverfront park brings the community closer to the natural systems of the Fox River, employing permeable surfaces and inviting structural forms. The folding and faceted upland benches and over-water structures promote improvised use by many types of visitors, and the linear park becomes a year-round thoroughfare for cyclists, joggers, and crosscountry skiers.At both the conceptual design level and construction detail level, the Fox Riverfront allows for the contingent events of the urban site. The construction documents prescribe solutions for building upon historical infrastructures and negotiating existing urban framework. The drawings outline a plan that anticipates economic development along the Fox River and also accommodates for the unpredictable qualities of the river itself.
57P r o f e s s i o n a l - F o x R i v e r f r o n t
Left: Standard and Permeable paver specifications
Below: Phase 01 Plan
Opposite: Installed upland benches, ipe decking, and
permeable paversPhoto by Nixy Morales
Standard Paver
Astor Place Development Flatley Court
Flatley Overlook
Permeable Paver
58 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3
Pine Street Stage
River Center Development Pine Street
59P r o f e s s i o n a l - F o x R i v e r f r o n t
60 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3
Above: An inline skater experiments on Flatley OverlookPhotos by Nixy Morales
Below: Conceptual section of Flatley Overlook and upland
61P r o f e s s i o n a l - F o x R i v e r f r o n t