Lisl p13

62
2013 Portfolio Lisl Kotheimer lislkotheimer.com

description

Design Portfolio

Transcript of Lisl p13

Page 1: Lisl p13

2013

Port

folio

Lisl

Kot

heim

er

l i s l k o t h e i m e r . c o m

Page 2: Lisl p13

2 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3

Page 3: Lisl p13

ProfileAcademicMontaudran Aerospace CampusNeokoolhismsSurface DeepProximity FieldAirport LandscapeLandscape of CommodityProfessionalUniversity Circle West GatewayFox Riverfront

0507081624323844505256

Lisl KotheimerPortfolio2013

3C o n t e n t s

Page 4: Lisl p13

4 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3

Page 5: Lisl p13

ProfileEducation2010-2012

2003-2007

Professional2011

2008-2010

2007-2008

2007

Instructional2012-2013

2012

2011-2012

Harvard University - Cambridge, MassachusettsGraduate School of DesignMaster of Landscape ArchitectureMLA II - 3 semester post professional degree

Ohio State University - Columbus, OhioAustin E. Knowlton School of ArchitectureBachelor of Science in Landscape Architecture

Landworks Studio - Summer Intern - Boston, Massachusetts

MKSK - Project Designer - Columbus, Ohio

Stoss Landscape Urbanism - Project Designer - Boston, Massachusetts

NBBJ - Project Designer - Columbus, Ohio

Lecturer - The Ohio State University - Austin E. Knowlton School of ArchitectureLRCH 3940: Design IV - Landscape Ecology and PlanningLRCH 2410: Workshop I - Analysis and CommunicationLRCH 2930: Design III - Social DynamicsLRCH 3440: Workshop IV - Advanced Landscape Technologies

Career Discovery Program - Harvard Graduate School of DesignDesign Representation Instructor

Teaching Fellow - Harvard Graduate School of DesignGSD 1211: Digital Topography Lab - MLA 3rd Semester Weekly Workshop

Teaching Assistant - Harvard Graduate School of DesignGSD 2142: Representation II - MLA Core CurriculumGSD 6243: Ecologies, Techniques, Technologies V - MLA Core CurriculumGSD 2322: Landscape as Digital Media - ElectiveGSD 1407: Landscape Morphologies - Studio OptionGSD 1112: Landscape Architecture II - Core Studio

5P r o f i l e

Page 6: Lisl p13

6

Page 7: Lisl p13

AcademicHarvard Graduate School of Design 2010-2012

7

Page 8: Lisl p13

8 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3

Page 9: Lisl p13

The City of Toulouse sits at the foot of the Pyrenees Mountains along the Garonne River. The site, located a kilometer outside of downtown Toulouse, is the abandoned Montaudran airport, a single runway with a rich history that runs parallel to the Canal du Midi and is adjacent to a thriving academic and research district known as “Aerospace Valley.” The purpose of the project is to transform the 60 hectare site into a mixed-use development and a metropolitan park. The strategy is to employ topographic models as a system for generating urban and ecological transformation -- activating a framework that is contextually and culturally relevant to the city of Toulouse and the larger region. The site will be a dynamic landscape that fosters a continuous and rich dialogue between topography, ecology, water, program and culture.

GSD1407: Studio Option, Spring 2011Critic: Philippe Coignetof O-L-M, Paris, FranceSite: Montaudran Aerospace Campus, Toulouse, France

Montaudran Aerospace Campus

Opposite: CNC milled model; conceptual framework for water conveyance and storage

9A c a d e m i c - M o n t a u d r a n A e r o s p a c e C a m p u s

Page 10: Lisl p13

Below: Site analysis, programmatic adjacencies

Opposite: Context maps are based off of aeronautical charts,

where relevant information appears according to altitude /

scale of map

10 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3

Page 11: Lisl p13

11A c a d e m i c - M o n t a u d r a n A e r o s p a c e C a m p u s

Page 12: Lisl p13

12 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3

Page 13: Lisl p13

Opposite: Perspectives of contingent developments situated within the topographic framework

Below: Site sections of the academic campus

13A c a d e m i c - M o n t a u d r a n A e r o s p a c e C a m p u s

Page 14: Lisl p13

14 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3

Page 15: Lisl p13

Topographical analysisof CNC milled model

15A c a d e m i c - M o n t a u d r a n A e r o s p a c e C a m p u s

Page 16: Lisl p13

16 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3

Page 17: Lisl p13

GSD1507: Studio Option, Spring 2012Critic: Ciro Najleof General Design Bureau, Buenos Aries, ArgentinaSiteless

Neokoolhisms

Using Rem Koolhaas’s 1978 publication, Delirious New York, as a lens for exploring contemporary forms of urban development, this project imagines a new language for the generation of territorial-scale anti-urban models -- or neokoolhisms.

Specific focus is placed on the economically subserviant satellite cities of natural resource extraction industries. Geographically isolated and often spurious, these cities have unique economic, political, and social characteristics as well as the expectation of varying degrees of finality.

Instead of portraying nature, this project is a tale that begins with the pragmatic conjectures of the businessman who invests in the extraction industry. This half-fairy tale describes the growth of the satellite city, where real-life political and economic objectives coalesce in an unconscious agglomeration of sensation and heightened perception.

Perspective view of generic satellite city

17A c a d e m i c - N e o k o o l h i s m s

Page 18: Lisl p13

00

0203

04

10

05 06

11 12

07

01

0809

1415

21

22

2313

20

19

1817

16

24

2526

27

28

36

29

37

38

39

30

40

4142

4948

47

68

46

5756

45

63

64

7069

55

54

62

53

35

52

51

43

33 34

44

31

32

50

59

61

60

6566

67

68

S1 = ChannelV1 = Divide Distance [DD]V2 = Offset Distance [OD]V3 = Circle Max Radius [MR]V4 = Closest Islands [CL]Island Accretion

L I S L K O T H E I M E R * J E F F R E Y B U T C H E R T H E R I V E R , T H E M O U N TA I N & T H E M E T R O P O L I S

64 65

The Grid -- or [the accretion] of the metropolitan territory into maximum increments of [paradise] describes an archipelago of ‘cities within cities.’

MAP OF THE WORLD2500MOM

C H A P T E R O N E

L I S L K O T H E I M E R * J E F F R E Y B U T C H E R T H E R I V E R , T H E M O U N TA I N & T H E M E T R O P O L I S

02 03

PrefaceA HALF FAIRY TALE

The WorldDubai, UAE

Qianhai PortChina - OMA

Long Tan ParkChina - MVRDV

ErenhotMongolia

KarathaAustralia

El SalvadorChile - Niemeyer

Al AhmadiKuwait City, Kuwait

ChenggongChina

Oyu TolgoiMongolia

DubailandDubai, UAE

SandoupingChina

ChambishiZambia

KaramayChina

King AbdullahSaudi Arabia

Salar de UyuniBolivia

AshioJapan

PreconditionsONCE UPON A TIME

Chapter OneA PLACE NO ONE CALLS HOME

Chapter FiveTH IS STOP IS ONLY TEMPORARY

Chapter TwoDESTRUCTION HAS NO MEMORY -- ONE LIKES TO TH INK

Chapter SixAT THE EDGE -- WHO’S IN CHARGE?

Chapter ThreeA PROMISE TOLD AND NOT YET KEPT

Chapter SevenMAJESTIC SYMBOL IN THE DESERT

Chapter FourFOR VISITORS, THE STREETS COME ALIVE

Chapter EightALTERNATE END INGS

Appendix IMODELS

Appendix IIGENERIC MODEL

Notes

TA B L E O F C O N T E N T S

A HALF-FAIRY-TALE

PrefaceTable of Contents

Rem Koolhaas’s 1978 publication, Delirious New York - “...it untangles theories, tactics and dissimulations to establish the desires of Manhattan’s collective unconscious as realities in the Grid.”

Using Rem Koolhaas’s 1978 publication, Delirious New York

(DNY), as a lens for exploring contemporary forms of urban devel-

opment, this project imagines a new language for the generation of

territorial-scale anti-urban models -- or neokoolhisms.

Specific focus is placed on the economically subservient satellite cit-

ies of natural resource extraction industries and new cities emerging

from the wealth created by such commodities. Geographically iso-

lated and often spurious, these cities have unique economic, politi-

cal, and social characteristics as well as the expectation of varying

degrees of finality.

This is a tale that begins with the pragmatic conjectures of the busi-

nessman who invests in the extraction industry. This half-fairy-tale

describes the growth of the satellite city as it approaches the imagi-

nary -- where the city progresses into a state of unconsciousness.

Each chapter is designed as a typological case study of two cities,

and the tale is constructed based on commonalities and relation-

ships between economic, political, social, and developmental char-

acteristics of individual cases. Each chapter ultimately relays the

18 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3

Page 19: Lisl p13

Project spreads: the project explores eight case studies by reducing urban form to its fundamental geometries and relationships. By drawing information from the case studies a new satellite city is constructed using associative modeling.

L I S L K O T H E I M E R * J E F F R E Y B U T C H E R

150 151

T H E R I V E R , T H E M O U N TA I N & T H E M E T R O P O L I S A P P E N D I X I IG E N E R I C M O D E L

THE WORLD FRAMEWORK

DIVISION = 256M

OFFSET = 190M

THE WORLD FRAMEWORK

RADIUS = 0 to 153M [varies]

12KM0KM 12KM0KM

0001020304050607080910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970

MRODDD CI

R = 0R = 0 R = -5R = 5

R = -15R = 15

R = -25R = 25

T H E R I V E R , T H E M O U N TA I N & T H E M E T R O P O L I S

67

L I S L K O T H E I M E R * J E F F R E Y B U T C H E R

66

M O D E L - T H E W O R L D

2500M 2500M0M 0M

A P P E N D I X I

Divide Distance [DD] = 147

Offset Distance [OD] = 247

Circle Max Radius [MR] = 147

Closest Islands [CI] = variable

MODEL

19A c a d e m i c - N e o k o o l h i s m s

Page 20: Lisl p13

Above: Perspective view of generic satellite city looking

toward the metropolis

Opposite: Perspective view of satellite city looking toward the

mountains

20 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3

Page 21: Lisl p13

21A c a d e m i c - N e o k o o l h i s m s

Page 22: Lisl p13

Physical model: laser cut museum board

22 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3

Page 23: Lisl p13

23A c a d e m i c - N e o k o o l h i s m s

Page 24: Lisl p13

Photos by Martin Bond and Asensio-Mah

24 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3

Page 25: Lisl p13

Harvard GSD and Asensio-Mahfor the International Garden Festival, 2011 EditionReford Gardens, Grand-Métis, Quebec, CanadaGSD Students: Day Jimenez, Mariela Alvarez, Lisl Kotheimer, Somkiet Chokvijtkul, Daekwon Park, Benjamin Winters, Yuan Zhan, Fred Chung, Troy Vaughn, Benjamin Tew, Victor PerezamadoConsultants: AKT Engineering, Bryophyta Technologies

Surface Deep Surface Deep is a new entry sequence for the visitors to the International Garden Festival in Grand-Métis. Revisiting the garden wall, an element that has been a consistent expressive element within the history of gardening, the wall is augmented and transformed to form a ribbon surface that constructs new associations, expressions and functions for the entry sequence. Its undulating form is a response and gesture for a new entry sequence which also embeds an experimental moss surface that fl ips between a wall, a ground, and a cover, while creating multiple orientations and microclimates for the living material. Surface Deep constructs a new way to meander, as well as gather at the entry of the gardens, while secretly enveloping a multiply oriented garden, enveloped within its surface depth.

25A c a d e m i c - S u r f a c e D e e p

Page 26: Lisl p13

26 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3

Page 27: Lisl p13

In the Fall of 2010, Alexander Reford asked the Harvard GSD to develop the garden for the 2011 edition of the International Garden Festival. Beginning in the Spring 2011 semester and advised by GSD faculty members Leyre Asensio-Villoria and David Mah, students were asked to develop prototypes that could be fabricated with extensive use of the Harvard GSD’s Fabrication Laboratory. Emphasis was placed on the development of variable and modular structures that could simultaneously perform a multiplicity of functions such as surfaces, seating, shade structures, or planters while providing a cohesive vision for the 10-meter by 20-meter garden plot. For several weeks, the team researched a variety of typologies, geometries, and construction techiques until a decision was made to move forward with the development of the ribbon-like garden wall.

The wall was fabricated at the Harvard GSD, partially assembled, then shipped to Grand-Métis to be fully installed.

Opposite: Preliminary studies for walls and screens; 1-5, complex modular screens; 6, Weaire-Phelan wall; 7-8, transitioning surface or screen

27A c a d e m i c - S u r f a c e D e e p

Page 28: Lisl p13

28 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3

Page 29: Lisl p13

Opposite: mock-up of structural components at the Harvard GSD

Top: mock-up of screens and ‘moss trays’ at the Harvard GSD

29A c a d e m i c - S u r f a c e D e e p

Page 30: Lisl p13

30 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3

Page 31: Lisl p13

Opposite: screen detail of Surface Deep installed at Reford Gardens, summer 2011

Top: structural detail of Surface Deep installed at Reford Gardens, summer 2011

Photos by Martin Bond and Asensio-Mah

31A c a d e m i c - S u r f a c e D e e p

Page 32: Lisl p13

32 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3

Page 33: Lisl p13

GSD2444: Advanced Landscape as Digital MediaCritic: David MahStudents: Marcus Owens, Lisl Kotheimer

Proximity Field

33A c a d e m i c - P r o x i m i t y F i e l d

Page 34: Lisl p13

The design team developed a garden prototype as a means to explore digital design tools such as 3-D modeling, parametric tools, and digital fabrication methods. The focused project, Proximity Field, is a performative landscape system where topographical conditions and the orientation of a field of components are defined by the manipulation of a set of curves. The model easily generates infinite topographical and surface organizations, and the physical representation projects the dynamism of the surface and its constituent field. The flowing form invites the possibility of applications that will function beyond the expectations of the static garden.

Fabrication of the final model was a multi-step process. A surface was created with a 3-axis mill. The 6-axis ABS robot was required to dril l a grid of holes at various angles on the milled surface to receive the field of components. The individual components, each with unique proportions, were laser cut and numbered to have a precise orientation accross the milled surface.

34 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3

Page 35: Lisl p13

Top: The ABS robot at work in the Harvard GSD Fabrication Lab

Bottom: The laser-cut components layed out on a template to be glued and painted

35A c a d e m i c - P r o x i m i t y F i e l d

Page 36: Lisl p13

36 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3

Page 37: Lisl p13

37A c a d e m i c - P r o x i m i t y F i e l d

Page 38: Lisl p13

<W E>

N><S

DEER I.

SNAKE I.LOGAN INTERNATIONALAIRPORT

CASTLE I.

THOMPSON I.

MOON I.

NUT I.BUMPKIN I.

SPECTACLE I.

LONG I.

GALLOPS I.

GEORGES I.

LOVELLS I.

GREAT BREWSTER I.

MIDDLE BREWSTER I.

OUTER BREWSTER I.CALF I.

GREEN I.

GRAPE I.SLATE I.

RAINSFORD I.

PEDDOCKS I.

38 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3

Page 39: Lisl p13

GSD1403: Studio Option, Fall 2010Critics: Eelco Hooftman, Bridget Bainesof GROSS.MAX., Edinburgh, ScotlandSite: Boston, Massachusetts

Airport Landscape

The Boston Harbor islands are part of a regional landscape that extends from the outer-most islands in the Boston Bay well into the metropolitan area of Boston. This entire landscape was formed by retreating glaciers, leaving a rare condition of a drumlin field intersecting the coast. Most of the islands are partially drowned drumlins with a few of the outer islands being glacially scored bedrock. Throughout the city ’s history the harbor islands served many different functions: as a commodity, as urban infrastructure, and as a recreational destination. As the island geomorphology extends into East Boston, Somerville, Revere, and Chelsea it is marked with parks and monuments and occupied by a variety of public institutions, collective uses that were prescribed by Charles Eliot in the late 19th century. Today, the harbor islands are protected as a National Recreation Area and primarily serve as a welcome mat for passenger aircraft arriving at Logan International Airport.

As the airport intersects the drumlin field the geomorphological features of the Boston Bay disappear into 2400 acres of flat and featureless infrastructural domain. The aspiration of this project is to restore the landscape heritage and cultural connection to this highly inaccessible infrastructural landscape that is situated central to downtown Boston and its waterfront.

The project begins by recovering Noddles and Governors islands as strategic intermediary nodes in the local greenway and transportation network. This begins to engage the airport with East Boston and the inter-island ferry system.Opposite: Perspective of Logan

Airport; Geomorphological identity of the Boston Harbor Islands

39A c a d e m i c - A i r p o r t L a n d s c a p e

Page 40: Lisl p13

The airfield outfall zone, the largest and least accessible region of the airport property becomes an opportunity for strategic intervention. With the airport situated where three regional watersheds converge and empty into the Boston Harbor, water quality, in correspondence with the operations of the airport is of utmost importance to the Massachusetts Port Authority.

By referring to airport design guidelines, under-performing zones throughout the airfield are identified within the efficiently functioning infrastructural framework. A cut and fil l operation begins to restore the geomorphological character of the site while providing an opportunity for stormwater fi ltration and the removal of the most threatening chemical contaminants from the airfield outfall zone.

Above: Lost islands of East Boston and Logan Airport

Opposite: Perspective of the New Governor’s Island

40 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3

Page 41: Lisl p13

41A c a d e m i c - A i r p o r t L a n d s c a p e

Page 42: Lisl p13

42 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3

Page 43: Lisl p13

Governor’s Island and the inter-island ferry system

43A c a d e m i c - A i r p o r t L a n d s c a p e

Page 44: Lisl p13

Independent Research, Fall 2011Advisor: Chris Reedof Stoss Landscape UrbanismSite: Greater Las Vegas, Nevada

Landscape of Commodity

In the next 25 years the Las Vegas Valley will experience a population increase of as much as half a mill ion people. Although this is a modest projection compared to those made prior to 2008, any amount of growth in the Valley will require governments to seek additional water resources tosupport the urban population. The region subsists due to its growth-and-development-driven economy, typically seeing the population double every 10 years, but with a current population of about 2 mill ion, the urban region is barely meeting its water needs. Therefore, any future growth will require a corresponding change in water resources.

44 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3

Page 45: Lisl p13

45A c a d e m i c - L a n d s c a p e o f C o m m o d i t y

Page 46: Lisl p13

Instead of implementing more stringent water conservation measures at a local scale, the Southern Nevada Water Authority is favoring exploitation of far-away resources with the Groundwater Development Project. The Water Authority looks to increase supplies to meet the needs of the future population, incidentally, providing enough resources for developers to build as many as 200,000 new homes in the region. While supporting the long-standing growth-driven economy of the Las Vegas Valley, the Groundwater Development Project prolongs a paradoxical relationship between the Valley ’s economic mainstay and its lack of water resources. The financial and ecological implications ofthe project are potentially vast, while its long-term value to the urban population is uncertain.

The current situation in the Las Vegas Valley suggests that growth and development practices must be reorganized to meet the needs and expectations of developers, governments, and the urban population, while maintaining the value of ecological systems within the Valley and beyond. This research looks to reorganize the components that make up the physical environment of the Las Vegas Valley, including private development, infrastructure, and ecological systems, to produce more resilient and sustainable development typologies that are focused on water conservation.

Below: The water resource cycle of the Las Vegas Valley with over

200,000 afy allocated through return-flow credits

Opposite: The Valley currently draws its water resources from

a vast region. The Colorado River Compact designates

300,000 afy to Southern Nevada. The proposed Groundwater Development Project would expand the footprint of the

urban region, affecting 8 major sub-surface flow systems and all

78 basins of the Central Basin and Range ecoregion.

46 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3

Page 47: Lisl p13

Regulating Tank

Pressure Reducing Station

Primary Substation

Regulating Tank

Multi-Facility

Water Treatment Facility

Silverhawk Generating Station

Pumping StationSecondary Substation

Pumping Station

Secondary Substation

Gondor Substation

Pumping Station

Secondary Substation

Multi-Facility

Regulating TankPumping Station

Regulating Tank

Secondary SubstationPumping Station

Pressure Reducing Station

Regulating Tank

MunicipalWater Source

Colorado River510,000 AFY - 90%

Las Vegas Valley Groundwater43,000 AFY - 10%

Water DemandsFuture Scenario

Arizona Bank + Augmentation50,000 AFY - 7%

Las Vegas Valley Groundwater43,000 AFY - 6%

Muddy / Virgin Rivers + Coyote Springs30,000 AFY - 5%

Colorado RiverX% - 510,000 AFY

In-State Groundwater Resources7% - 50,000 AFY

MunicipalMetered Water Use

Commercial / Industrial14.4%

Resorts6.3%

Schools / Government Parks5%

Common Areas5.2%

Other2.5%

Residential59%

WATER RESOURCESFOR THE 21st CENTURY

In the Las Vegas Valley, the resource of highest concern is water. The region currently relies on the Colorado River to provide 90% of its water resources -- the remainder is drawn from a shallow aquifer through municipal and private wells. The Colorado River Compact of 1920 apportions 300,000 afy to Southern Nevada. The Southern Nevada Water Authority treats and returns 210,000 afy of effluent, allowing a total withdrawal of 510,000 afy from the Colorado River through a system of return-flow credits.

Expecting that in the next 25 years there will only be a slight decline in per-capita water usage, the Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA) is currently

pursuing the development of groundwater resources located hundreds of miles away in Spring, Cave, Delamar, Dry Lake, and Snake valleys. The purpose of the SNWA Groundwater Development Project (GDP) is to diversify the re-gion’s water resources and to meet the projected needs of the growing popula-tion. If completed, the project will consist of over 300 miles of subsurface pipeline and the necessary facilities for pumping, filtering, and conveying up to 176,655 afy of water to its recipients in Clark and Lincoln counties. Although in a preliminary planning stage, the project is estimated to cost between $3.6 billion and as much as $15 billion.1 2 The SNWA is currently pursuing the right

of way for the main pipeline, which will be routed along a new energy corridor, primarily traversing land that is managed by the BLM.

Critics believe that the GDP will threaten aquatic ecosystems, including many endemic species, in the Central Basin and Range ecoregion and cause perma-nent land subsidence. These arguments against the project are extremely apt: in 1957 and 1958, during the Las Vegas Valley’s most rapid period of growth, similar groundwater harvesting dried up springs and drained the region’s distinctive wetlands and meadows. The only remnant of the landscape from which the Valley takes its name is the Las Vegas Wash – a channelized and

intensified waterway fed by urban stormwater and discharge from municipal wastewater treatment facilities.3

Furthermore, the history and politics of groundwater harvesting bring another complicated dimension to the SNWA GRP. The legal rules govern-ing groundwater use typically reward those who exploit the resource while the consequences of over-use are absorbed by the larger population.4 The SNWA’s proposal will tap into a regional carbonate aquifer that extends from Death Valley to Salt Lake City, an ecologically robust region that is scattered with many federally protected parks and wildlife refuges. Fundamentally, this

increases the number of stakeholders in the GDP, and out of purely economic necessity, the project ignores the reality that water is a limited resource and that redistributing and rerouting it at a large scale will most certainly create problems elsewhere. Characteristic of any large-scale infrastructural proposal, the politics, cost, and negative ecological impact that the GDP promises may ultimately lead to its renunciation as a feasible option for sustaining future development in the Las Vegas Valley. This reality suggests that governments must investigate other strategies that will appeal to the urban population with-out the the high financial and ecological risks of the GDP.

2,850,000 AFY>ARIZONA

1,500,000 AFYMEXICO<

840,000 AFY>NEW MEXICO

3,860,000 AFY>COLORADO

1,040,000 AFY>WYOMING

$3.5 BILLIONPROPOSED SNWA GROUNDWATER

DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

ALLOCATIONSCOLORADO RIVER COMPACT (1922)

SYSTEMSOUTHERN NEVADA WATER AUTHORITY

270,000 AFY>SOUTHERN NEVADA

300,000 AFYSOUTHERN NEVADA<

4,400,000 AFYCALIFORNIA<

CENTRAL BASIN AND RANGEThe Central Basin and Range ecoregion is internally drained and is characterized by a mosaic of xeric basins, scattered low and high mountains, and salt flats. It has a hotter and drier climate, more shrubland, and more mountain ranges than the Northern Basin and Range (80) ecoregion to the north. Basins are covered by Great Basin sagebrush or saltbush-greasewood vegetation that grow in Aridisols; cool season grasses are less common than in the Mollisols of the Snake River Plain (12) and Northern Basin and Range. The region is not as hot as the Mojave Basin and Range (14) ecoregion to the south and it has a greater percent of land that is grazed.

MOJAVE BASIN AND RANGEThis ecoregion contains broad basins and scattered mountains that are generally lower, warmer, and drier, than those of the Central Basin and Range (13). Its creosote bush-dominated shrub community is distinct from the saltbush–greasewood and sagebrush–grass associations that occur to the north in the Central Basin and Range (13) and Northern Basin and Range (80); it is also differs from the palo verde–cactus shrub and saguaro cactus that occur in the Sonoran Basin and Range (81) to the south. Most of this region is federally owned and grazing is constrained by the lack of water and forage for livestock. Heavy use of off-road vehicles and motorcycles in some areas has made the soils susceptible to wind and water erosion.

47A c a d e m i c - L a n d s c a p e o f C o m m o d i t y

Page 48: Lisl p13

$3.5 BILLION

Regulating Tank

Pressure Reducing Station

Primary Substation

Regulating Tank

Multi-Facility

Water Treatment Facility

Silverhawk Generating Station

Pumping StationSecondary Substation

Pumping Station

Secondary Substation

Gondor Substation

Pumping Station

Secondary Substation

Multi-Facility

Regulating TankPumping Station

Regulating Tank

Secondary SubstationPumping Station

Pressure Reducing Station

Regulating Tank

SOUTHERN NEVADA WATER AUTHORITYGROUNDWATER DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

LAS VEGASVALLEY

MunicipalWater Source

Colorado River510,000 AFY - 90%

Las Vegas Valley Groundwater43,000 AFY - 10%

Water DemandsFuture Scenario

Arizona Bank + Augmentation50,000 AFY - 7%

Las Vegas Valley Groundwater43,000 AFY - 6%

Muddy / Virgin Rivers + Coyote Springs30,000 AFY - 5%

Colorado RiverX% - 510,000 AFY

In-State Groundwater Resources7% - 50,000 AFY

MunicipalMetered Water Use

Commercial / Industrial14.4%

Resorts6.3%

Schools / Government Parks5%

Common Areas5.2%

Other2.5%

Residential59%

48 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3

Page 49: Lisl p13

APEXPopulation: n/aEconomy: Energy, Waste, Mining

CALIENTEPopulation: 1,123Established: Railroad townEconomy: Tourism, Parks + Recreation

US-93

I-80

I-80

US-93

PIOCHEPopulation: 900Established: Mining TownEconomy: Tourism,Parks + Recreation

BAKERPopulation: 68Established: TourismEconomy: Parks + Recreation

ELYPopulation: 4255Established: Stagecoach TownEconomy: Copper mining,Tourism, Parks + Recreation

LAS VEGAS

SilverhawkGeneratingStation

GondorSubstation

RobinsonSummitSubstation

500Kv

500Kv

230Kv

Far Left: Water resources and applications

Above: The Groundwater Development Project and related infrastructure

49A c a d e m i c - L a n d s c a p e o f C o m m o d i t y

Page 50: Lisl p13

50

Page 51: Lisl p13

ProfessionalUniversity Circle West GatewayMSI Design 2010

Fox RiverfrontStoss Landscape Urbanism 2008

51

Page 52: Lisl p13

52 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3

Page 53: Lisl p13

Cleveland, OhioUniversity Circle IncorporatedMSI Design, 2010Design Team: Keith Meyers, Jeff Pongonis, Lisl Kotheimer

University CircleWest Gateway

53P r o f e s s i o n a l - U n i v e r s i t y C i r c l e W e s t G a t e w a y

Page 54: Lisl p13

1” Thick Acrylic SurfaceColor: Vapor (White)Finish: Renewable MatteHeat-Formed Rectangular Shape

Horizontal Scoring / Etched Surface

Acrylic Surface Bolted to Aluminum Frame

Internally illuminated w/ LED ‘puck’ lightWhite or RGB

Aluminum FramePowdercoatMinimum Width to provide Structural Support

1” Thick Acrylic SurfaceColor: Vapor (White)Finish: Renewable MatteFlat Surface w/ CNC Cut Shape

Horizontal Scoring / Etched Surface

Acrylic Surface Bolted to Aluminum Frame

Internally illuminated w/ LED ‘puck’ lightWhite or RGB

Aluminum FramePowdercoat

“As part of the Euclid Gateway Vision grant, UCI is committed to highlighting the Western gateway into the neighborhood and the site of the original University Circle, from which the area takes its name. A series of custom designed, sculptural l ighting elements will trace the path of the original circle, and integrated benches will mark the location of interpretive elements that will recall the rich history of transportation through the region.”

-University Circle 2010 Annual Report

The lighting elements are not to appear as an addition to the sign posts, power lines, and traffic signals that are characteristic of the busy intersection in downtown Cleveland. The design team researched many materials for the lighting elements including wood, metal, and plastic until a translucent resin was selected for its subtlety during the day and unique ability to distribute light evenly when i l luminated.

Concept A Assembly

Photo provided by University Circle Incorporated

Concept B Assembly

54 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3

Page 55: Lisl p13

55P r o f e s s i o n a l - U n i v e r s i t y C i r c l e W e s t G a t e w a y

Page 56: Lisl p13

56 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3

Page 57: Lisl p13

Green Bay, WisconsinCity of Green Bay Department of Public WorksStoss Landscape Urbanism, 2008Design Team: Chris Reed, Scott Bishop, Jill Desimini, Lisl Kotheimer

Fox Riverfront The Fox Riverfront is a unique public surface -- a performance space for the City of Green Bay. The new riverfront park brings the community closer to the natural systems of the Fox River, employing permeable surfaces and inviting structural forms. The folding and faceted upland benches and over-water structures promote improvised use by many types of visitors, and the linear park becomes a year-round thoroughfare for cyclists, joggers, and crosscountry skiers.At both the conceptual design level and construction detail level, the Fox Riverfront allows for the contingent events of the urban site. The construction documents prescribe solutions for building upon historical infrastructures and negotiating existing urban framework. The drawings outline a plan that anticipates economic development along the Fox River and also accommodates for the unpredictable qualities of the river itself.

57P r o f e s s i o n a l - F o x R i v e r f r o n t

Page 58: Lisl p13

Left: Standard and Permeable paver specifications

Below: Phase 01 Plan

Opposite: Installed upland benches, ipe decking, and

permeable paversPhoto by Nixy Morales

Standard Paver

Astor Place Development Flatley Court

Flatley Overlook

Permeable Paver

58 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3

Page 59: Lisl p13

Pine Street Stage

River Center Development Pine Street

59P r o f e s s i o n a l - F o x R i v e r f r o n t

Page 60: Lisl p13

60 L i s l K o t h e i m e r - 2 0 1 3

Page 61: Lisl p13

Above: An inline skater experiments on Flatley OverlookPhotos by Nixy Morales

Below: Conceptual section of Flatley Overlook and upland

61P r o f e s s i o n a l - F o x R i v e r f r o n t

Page 62: Lisl p13