LIN 617: Hodge, Jespersen, Sapir, the Linguistic Cycle, and more April 2015.
-
Upload
ambrose-barker -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of LIN 617: Hodge, Jespersen, Sapir, the Linguistic Cycle, and more April 2015.
What is Historical Linguistics?
What: Typical (phonological) change
Why: due to language acquisition or external influence
Methods: CM, IR, OED, DOE, etc
Interdisciplinary: genetics, language families, migrations
Greenberg, Cavalli-Sforza, Bickerton
GrammaticalizationH&Tr: Grmmz is the “process whereby lexical items and constructions come in certain linguistic contexts to serve grammatical functions, and, once grammaticalized, continue to develop new grammatical functions”. (2003: xv)
EvG: Grmmz is reanalysis by the language learner of lexical items in a more economical way.
Main changesDemonstratives > articles
V > Aux
Loss of Case
Loss of verb endings
Loss of ge- > more phrasal verbs
EMOD:
Grammaticalization is unidirectional on the cline in (1).
(1) lexical phrase/word > grammatical item > clitic > affix > zero
Andersen (2008: 15) points out that this clines contains semantic change (lexical > grammatical), morphological (word > clitic > affix), and phonological change (especially in the later stages):
Other possibilities (morphosyntax vs argument hood):
(2) a. phrase > word/head >clitic > affix > 0
b. adjunct > argument >(argument) > agreement > 0
Examples of grammaticalization in English
On, from P to ASP
VP Adverbials > TP/CP Adverbials
Like, from P > C (like I said)
Negative objects to negative markers
Modals: v > ASP > T
To: P > ASP > M > C
PP > C (for him to do that ...)
V>AUX P>AUX P>C
go motion > future
to direction>mood
for location>time>cause
have possession>perfect
on location>aspect
after location>time
The Linguistic Cycle
- Hodge (1970: 3): Old Egyptian morphological complexity (synthetic stage) turned into Middle Egyptian syntactic structures (analytic stage) and then back into morphological complexity in Coptic.
- “today’s morphology is yesterday's syntax“ (Givón 1971)
Macroparameters à la Baker 2001
• Synthetic-analytic
• Head-dependent
• Argument Structure
• Possibly head-parameter
Sapir (1921: 128)
“the terms [analytic and synthetic] are more useful in defining certain drifts than as absolute counters”.
Some Micro-CyclesNegative (neg):
neg indefinite/adverb > neg particle > (neg particle)
Definiteness
demonstrative > article > class marker
Agreement
emphatic > pronoun > agreement
Auxiliary
V/A/P > M > T > C
Clausal
pronoun > complementizer
PP/Adv > Topic > C
Negative Cycle in English
a. no/ne early Old English
b. ne (na wiht/not) after 900, esp S
c. (ne) not after 1350
d. not > -not/-n’t after 1400
How renewed?
Hodge, Jespersen, and Sapir
focus on macrocycles, though they do not use that term.
Heine, Claudi & Hünnemeyer (1991: 246) argue that there is “more justification to apply the notion of a linguistics cycle to individual linguistic developments” rather than to changes from analytic to synthetic and back to analytic.
History of Egyptian
Old Egyptian: 3000 BCE – 2000 BCE
Middle Egyptian: 2000-1300 BCE
Late Egyptian: 1300 BCE – 700 BCE
Demotic Egyptian: 600 BCE – 400 CE
Coptic: 300 -1300 CE
Rosetta
Stone
Hieroglyphic
Demotic
Greek
Older to later Egyptian
(1) rmc `the man’ snt `a sister’
(2) pʔ rmt wʕ(t) sn(t)
(3) p-romə wə-sonə
(adapted from Loprieno)
Old Egyptian … Coptic
(1) scm-f n-k
listen.prosp-3MS to-2MS
`May he listen to you.’
(2) mare-f-so:tem əro-k
OPT-3MS-listen to-2MS
`May he listen to you.’
(Loprieno 2001: 1743)
Early > Late > Coptic(1) jw scm-n-j xrw
indeed hear-PRET-1S voice
(2) jr-j-stm wʕ xrw
do-1S-hearing a-voice
(3) a-i-setm-wə-xrou
PRET-1S-hear-a-voice
`I heard a voice.’
Spiral or Cycle:
Spiral is another term for cycle (see von der Gabelentz 1901: 256; Hagège 1993: 147); it emphasizes the unidirectionality of the changes: languages do not reverse earlier change but may end up in a stage typologically similar to an earlier one.
Jespersen (1922: chapter 21.9) uses spirals when he criticizes the concept of cyclical change.
vd Gabelentz 1901
immer gilt das Gleiche: die Entwicklungsliniekrümmt sich zurück nach der Seite derIsolation, nicht in die alte Bahn, sondern in eineannähernd parallele. Darum vergleiche ich sieder Spirale.
"always the same: the development curves back towards isolation, not in the old way, but in a parallel fashion. That's why I compare them to spirals" (my translation, EvG).
Criticisms
Not precise
Jespersen
Newmeyer (2006) notes that some grammaticalizations from noun/verb to affix can take as little as 1000 years, and wonders how there can be anything left to grammaticalize if this is the right scenario.
Hopper & Traugott (2003: 124)
The cyclical model is “extremely problematic because it suggests that a stage of a language can exist when it is difficult or even impossible to express some concept” (p. 124).
Unidirectional and overlap
• always something around to express, for instance, negation or the subject.
• usually not the same element, e.g. ne > not
• if the same element, this is due to layering
Sapir (1921) on drift
P. 150: “a current of its own making”. Even if there is no split into dialects, languages drift.
P. 154: what is drift/change?
P. 155: “The linguistic drift has direction”.
e.g. who did you see?
Sapir, 158 ff.Loss:• who/whom are “psychologically related to
when, what, etc.• the only one to show Case in its group
Scale of hesitation (162)
Three drifts: loss of Case, fixing of WO, invariable word.
The Copula and DP Cycles(1) dani (hu) ha-more Hebrew
Dani he the-teacher
‘Dani is the teacher.’
(2) hu malax 'al jisra'el Hebrew
‘He ruled over Israel.’
(Katz 1996: 86)
Synthetic-analytic CycleGreenberg, Hodge, Schwegler, Haselow, Szmrecsanyi, and others.
Issues: calculation word+morph/word
Clitics
Pronouns
Derivational
unmarked