Limits on brane world cosmology Systematic effects in SN cosmology

17
Limits on brane world cosmology Systematic effects in SN cosmology (I) Extinction by dust in host galaxy or intergalactic medium/reddening Ongoing SCP High-z SN search (II) Gravitational lensing The SDSS-II SN- search Summary Ariel Goobar Stockholm University

description

Supernovae & Dark Energy. Limits on brane world cosmology Systematic effects in SN cosmology (I) Extinction by dust in host galaxy or intergalactic medium/reddening. Ongoing SCP High-z SN search (II) Gravitational lensing. Ariel Goobar Stockholm University. The SDSS-II SN-search. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Limits on brane world cosmology Systematic effects in SN cosmology

Page 1: Limits on brane world cosmology Systematic effects in SN cosmology

Limits on brane world cosmology

Systematic effects in SN cosmology

(I) Extinction by dust in host galaxy or intergalactic

medium/reddening Ongoing SCP High-

z SN search

(II) Gravitational lensing

The SDSS-II SN-search

Summary

Ariel Goobar

Stockholm University

Page 2: Limits on brane world cosmology Systematic effects in SN cosmology

2

Gravitational leakage into X-dimensionGravitational leakage into X-dimension

• Use SNLS (Astier et al 2005) + Baryon oscillations (Eisenstein et al 2005) to examine 5D extenction of Friedmann eqn suggested by Dvali, Gabadadge,Porrati 2000; Deffayet, Dvali, Gabadadze 2001.

2 8

3c

H GH

r

Fairbairn & AG, 2005

Page 3: Limits on brane world cosmology Systematic effects in SN cosmology

3

• Consider more general modifications to Friedmann eqn (as in Dvali & Turner, 2003)

Fit SNLS data + baryon oscillations AND flat universe

Gravitational leakage into X-dimension Gravitational leakage into X-dimension (2)(2)

22

8

3c

H GH

r

Fairbairn & AG, 2005

equiv

Page 4: Limits on brane world cosmology Systematic effects in SN cosmology

4

SNLS 1-year + BAO prior + flatnessSNLS 1-year + BAO prior + flatness

w=w0 + w1·z

Page 5: Limits on brane world cosmology Systematic effects in SN cosmology

5

• SN brightness evolution• Shape-brightness relation• K-corrections and SN colors

• Non-Type Ia contamination• Malmquist bias

• Host galaxy dust properties• Intergalactic dust• Gravitational lensing• Exotica:axion-photon oscillations, etc

• Instrumental corrections• Absolute calibration• Lightcurve fitting technique/host galaxy subtraction

• …

(Known) systematic effects(Known) systematic effects

Astrophysics of supernovae

Selection effects,contamination

Line of sight effects

Measurement issues

Page 6: Limits on brane world cosmology Systematic effects in SN cosmology

6

Dust/reddening: a real problem!Dust/reddening: a real problem!

• Dust in SN host galaxy (or along line of sight)

• Correction assumes some reddening law, typically Galactic type dust (SCP,High-Z Team) or average fit to any kind of reddening/blueing (SNLS)

• Can only be estimated for individual SNe with

a) accurate multi-wavelength data

b) good knowledge of intrinsic ”color” of SNe

• Extinction probabilty in a given galaxy depends on where the SN explosion happens

B-V colorof low-z SNe

Extinction:MB=RB·E(B-V) with RB~ 2 - 5

Extinction correction dominates measurement error!Exception: Elliptical galaxies (E/S0) have little star-formation & dust.

Page 7: Limits on brane world cosmology Systematic effects in SN cosmology

7

Extinction/reddening correctionsExtinction/reddening corrections

• z-dependence in reported Av ?

• Problems with K-corrections/assumed intrinsic colors in UV part of the SNIa spectrum?

• Changing dust properties ?

• Selection effects?

• Degeneracy in global fit?

• Watch out for priors on AV! Riess et al assume P(Av)~exp(-Av)

• Potential inconsistency for elliptical hosts

SN97ff: assumed extinction- free, E-host

Riess et al 2004 (gold sample)

Uncertainties ?

V

Page 8: Limits on brane world cosmology Systematic effects in SN cosmology

8

””GOLD”: systematics dominated?GOLD”: systematics dominated?

Spergel et al ’06

How to make progress at the highest-z?

Page 9: Limits on brane world cosmology Systematic effects in SN cosmology

9

galaxy type dispersion

•Spiral: Sa/Sb/Scmag•Irregular Scd/Irrmag

•Elliptical: E/S0 =0.16 mag

””Dustfree and decelerated”Dustfree and decelerated”

• 219 HST/ACS Orbits awarded (PI: Perlmutter) in C14 for rolling search for SNe on galaxy clusters 0.9<z<1.4.

• Clusters are rich on elliptical galaxies which (at low-z) only host SNIa (no contamination) and extinction by dust should be minimal.

• Expect ~20 SNe in a ”sharp(er)” Hubble diagram.

Sullivan et al 2003

Page 10: Limits on brane world cosmology Systematic effects in SN cosmology

10

First SN discovered in a cluster First SN discovered in a cluster in this searchin this search

Cluster RCS0221-03 at z = 1.02

Host was cataloged Cluster member.

Spectrum taken for confirmation.

ACS z bandACS I bandNicmos J band

preliminary

Page 11: Limits on brane world cosmology Systematic effects in SN cosmology

11

Intergalactic dustIntergalactic dust

• Large dust grains (weak wavelength dependence) may exist in the IG-medium

• Evolution of dust density: two limiting cases:

1. dust (1+z)3 [Model A]

2. dust (1+z)3 for z<0.5 &

dust(z>0.5)= dust(z=0.5) [Model B]

• SDSS QSO colors (>16000 objects, z<2) <0.1 mag extinction for SN1a at z=1; faintness of SNe cannot be only due to IG-dust

AG,Bergström & Mörtsell, A&A, 2002

Mörtsell & AG, 2003,

Östman & Mörtsell, 2005

Concordance

Model A

ModelB; M=1

Milne

IG Dust cannot explain observed faintness of SNe – but is a serious concern for precision cosmology.

SNLS: |M|<0.025; |w|<0.05

Page 12: Limits on brane world cosmology Systematic effects in SN cosmology

12

Lensing (de)magnification in the Lensing (de)magnification in the GOODS SN survey: a study case GOODS SN survey: a study case

• The photometric redshift catalogue for GOODS used to study the line-of-sight properties of the SNIa in the Riess et al 2004 sample

(see Gunnarsson et al ApJ 2006 and Jönsson et al ApJ 2006)

• Faber-Jackson & Tully Fischer relations used for M/L

• Galaxy halos modelled as truncated SIS or NFW

• Self-consistency loop: mass density in galaxies + unresolved matter=M

Page 13: Limits on brane world cosmology Systematic effects in SN cosmology

13

Magnification probabilityMagnification probability

• We find evidence for magnified and demagnified supernovae (1)

• Uncertainty computed by error progation from:

Finite field size error Redshift and position errors Scatter in FJ&TF relations Survey magnitude limit (incompleteness)

PDF built up by randomizing the contributions above according to their individual uncertainties,

• Estimate of magnification in SN1997ff smaller than in Benitez et al 2002, Riess et al 2004. This is understood, both authors now agree with our result.

z=1.27

z=1.75

Page 14: Limits on brane world cosmology Systematic effects in SN cosmology

14

Lensing PDFs for GOODS SN-sampleLensing PDFs for GOODS SN-sample

We found NO evidence for selection effects due to lensing in the GOODS SN sample.Negligible corrections to ’s & w.Expected lensing bias on SNLS results is also small: |M| ~0.01 in M- plane. Added uncertainty on w0 is w~0.014 for BAO prior (SNOC simulation)

Page 15: Limits on brane world cosmology Systematic effects in SN cosmology

15

SDSS II: intermediate-z SNeSDSS II: intermediate-z SNe

• NEW PROJECT – Since Sep 2005

• Aiming at filling in the ”gap” left by eg SNLS and ESSENCE with >300 well measured, accurately calibrated, multicolor LCs

• Repeat imaging of ~270 sq. deg. Sep-Nov 05-07

Page 16: Limits on brane world cosmology Systematic effects in SN cosmology

16

• 126 spectroscopically confirmed SN Ia (<z>=0.21)

• 13 spectroscopically probable SN Ia

• 6 SN Ib/c (3 hypernovae)

• 10 SN II (4 type IIn)

• 5 AGN

• ~hundreds of other unconfirmed SNe with good light curves (galaxy spectroscopic redshifts measured for ~25 additional Ia candidates)

• TO BE REPEATED IN 06 & 07 WITH EVEN BETTER FOLLOW-UP:

> 300 SNeIa in the DE dominated era!

Results from 2005Results from 2005

Courtesy of Bob Nichol

PreliminaryPreliminaryNo reddening corr.No reddening corr.

Page 17: Limits on brane world cosmology Systematic effects in SN cosmology

17

SummarySummary

• Lots of activities to increase the statistics of low, intermediate and high-z Type Ia supernovae

• Emphasis on high-quality data – control of systematics

• Extinction/reddening corrections remain a source of concern –especially for the highest-z data, maybe not in elliptical hosts

• Gravitational lensing (de)magnification not a problem for high-z SNe

• Concordance model in excellent shape

…so far, seems un-challenged by SN-data.