DIVISION OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF THE UNIVERSITY ARCHITECT Lilia Gonzales University Architect

General Services Complex, Suite 1801 1247 TAMU College Station, TX 77843-1247 Tel. 979.845.4370 lilia.gonzales@tamu.edu http://universityarchitect.tamu.edu

COUNCIL FOR THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT “TRACK B” REPORT

Project Name: Issue Date:

Eppright Hall Window Film Pilot Program 6/24/2021 Project Requestor: Individual/College or Division/Department or Unit Date Request Received: Kristianna Bowles, Residence Life 3/17/2021

CBE Sub-Councils Reviewed (reports attached): X DRsc X TRsc X Msc Other

Report copies provided to: CBE Co-Chairs, CBE Coordinator, CBE Sub-Council Chairs Joe Ramirez, Chareny Rydl

Status: Not Approved Approved X Approved with Caveats

Caveats: For full details see the attached Sub-Council Reports X DRsc X TRsc X Msc

Summary of Caveats:

Design Review sub-council – recommend approval with caveats

• Use of this window film is approved based on its purpose to reduce interior temperatures for residents and to reduce energy costs, and the fact that it will not impact building aesthetics or the warranty of the windows due to their age. It was noted that the use of window film for aesthetic reasons is not normally approved. Any window film that would void a window manufacturer’s warranty would not be approved.

• It is not approved to place the educational sticker on the corner of the windows due to the visual impact this would make when viewing from the outside, and potential impact to the film. Stickers or signage should be placed on the window sill or adjacent to the window. Residence Life to determine the best method of application.

• The pilot program should be evaluated after a certain period of time (24 months is recommended). Residence Life should work with Utilities & Energy Services to determine actual cost savings, and also evaluate the durability of the film inside a residence hall and whether there is an increased amount of maintenance. If the program is successful and it is desired to apply the film to additional residence halls, those requests must be submitted to the CBE for review and approval.

Maintenance sub-council – recommend approval

• All work associated with this request will be treated as a project and routed through SSC for management. • All maintenance costs associated with the applied film will be the responsibility of Res Life.

Technical Review sub-council – recommend approval with caveats

• Facilities Services o The project team should coordinate with Custodial Services concerning special cleaning instructions. o The project team should make Maintenance aware of the new window film and to which surface it is

applied. • Office of Mapping and Space Information

o Who will be responsible for the educational aspect of this project once the current Graduate Assistant graduates?

• Utilities & Energy Services

DIVISION OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF THE UNIVERSITY ARCHITECT Lilia Gonzales University Architect

General Services Complex, Suite 1801 1247 TAMU College Station, TX 77843-1247 Tel. 979.845.4370 lilia.gonzales@tamu.edu http://universityarchitect.tamu.edu

o UES suggests consulting our BAS team to better understand how the installation of the window film can impact energy consumption as it pertains to the building’s HVAC system.

•

Comments from the University Architect: The project is approved to proceed provided that all caveats, issues, and concerns are addressed. This is the responsibility of the requestor to ensure compliance with this report. Prior to ordering of material and installation, please provide written notification to the University Architect that all items noted above have been addressed with the appropriate parties.

COUNCIL FOR THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT DESIGN REVIEW SUB-COUNCIL

 

DESIGN REVIEW SUB‐COUNCIL REPORT  From:     Lilia Gonzales 

Design Review Sub‐Council Chair  Date:     June 3, 2021  Subject:  Eppright Hall Window Film Pilot Program      DRsc members reviewed a request from Residence Life for installation of window film on Eppright Hall. The purpose of the film is to reduce heat gain and improve temperature comfort for residents, as well as decrease the energy usage of the building.   The window film is slightly tinted, but when applied to the interior of the darkly tinted existing windows of Eppright Hall it is not expected to cause a visible change to the windows. It was noted that this type and brand of window film is already in use at other campus facilities: O&M building and University Libraries facilities.   Application of the window film is projected to save $8,000 per year in energy costs, resulting in a return on investment in about seven years. The film has a warranty of ten years and Residence Life has committed to be responsible for costs associated with maintenance or replacement needs after this time.   If approved, this project will be funded by a grant from the Aggie Green Fund. It is proposed to add stickers to the corners of the windows noting that the project is funded by AGF and reminding students not to place items on the windows so as not to harm the film.   This project is a pilot program. If it is determined to be successful, Residence Life would explore the possibility of adding window film to other residence hall facilities.   Recommendation DRsc members voted to recommend approval of the request for installation of window film on Eppright Hall with the following caveats:  

Use of this window film is approved based on its purpose to reduce interior temperatures for residents and to reduce energy costs, and the fact that it will not impact building aesthetics or the warranty of the windows due to their age. It was noted that the use of window film for aesthetic reasons is not normally approved. Any window film that would void a window manufacturer’s warranty would not be approved.  

It is not approved to place the educational sticker on the corner of the windows due to the visual impact this would make when viewing from the outside, and potential impact to the film. Stickers or signage should be placed on the window sill or adjacent to the window. Residence Life to determine the best method of application. 

The pilot program should be evaluated after a certain period of time (24 months is recommended). Residence Life should work with Utilities & Energy Services to determine actual cost savings, and also evaluate the durability of the film inside a residence hall and whether there is an increased amount of maintenance. If the program is successful and it is desired to apply the film to additional residence halls, those requests must be submitted to the CBE for review and approval.    

COUNCIL FOR THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT MAINTENANCE SUB-COUNCIL

JK Willliams Building, Suite 202 1181 TAMU College Station, TX 77843-1181 Tel. 979.862.7777 Fax 979.862.7778 http://finance.tamu.edu

MAINTENANCE SUB-COUNCIL REPORT - TRACK B From: Ralph R. Davila Maintenance Sub-Council Chair Date: May 5, 2021

Re: Res Life – Eppright Hall Window Film Pilot Request

The Maintenance Sub-Council (Msc) reviewed a request by Res Life Sustainability, Kristianna Bowles, to add window film to the noted building windows. Ms, Bowles presented the project as a major grant for submission to the Aggie Green Fund. From questions it was determined, and Res Life agrees that all cost associated with short- and long-term maintenance would be the responsibility of the Res Life. Recommendation The CBE Msc voted to recommend approval with the following caveats. • All work associated with this request will be treated as a project and routed through SSC for management. • All maintenance cost associated with the applied film will be the responsibly of Res Life.

Please contact me with any questions.

Cc: Msc Member

Proposed SiteEppright Hall

2

Project Background• Grant proposed and written by the Sustainable Aggies Living Learning Community

• Window film also suggested by previous student groups participating in the annual U-

Challenge hosted by Residence Life and UES

• Grant funded approved by the AGF and ready for implementation with CBE approval

• V-KOOL brand window film already in place on campus facilities (O&M and library facilities)

• Film is a tinted, light gray-green color

• Film is not expected to impact campus aesthetics as Eppright’s windows are already

slightly tinted

• Booklets with cutouts to show film color are available for viewing

3

Project Justification• Alignment with Campus Sustainability Master Plan goals

• 02-1: Decrease campus energy use intensity (EUI)• Reduced UV rays results in reduced cooling costs

• 05-1: Evolve architectural guidelines• Window film recommended in LEED building

guidelines• Alignment with Residence Life Sustainability Master Plan goal

• 03-7: Decrease DRL EUI• Resident temperature comfort and improved mood with

promotion of natural lighting• LLC members expressed not being able to enjoy natural

light during hot days due to excessive room heating

4Installation of film in residence

Implementation & Maintenance• Film installed by John Holleman of Sunshade Window Film

• Contracted on campus for prior film installation projects• Projected start date in mid-May after move-out

• Annual project electricity cost savings of ~$8,000/year• ROI of ~7 years• Film warranty = 10 years

• Resident Education• LLC members will create educational content (flyers, social media, etc.) for distribution• Stickers placed in corners of windows outlining project funded by AGF and to not place items on

windows• Window cleaner contractors informed to use ammonia-free cleaner and not saturate the windows per film

maintenance guidelines• Upkeep outside of warranty will be covered by Residence Life

• Installation of film will not impact any current warranty on the facility windows

5