Light Helicopter Family (LHX) · Light Helicopter Family (LHX) ... policy, or decision, unless so...

I I IV

ARI Research Note 89-30

Methods for Planning Unit and DisplacedN Equipment Training as Applied to the

Light Helicopter Family (LHX)

John W. Lindquist, Robert E. Robinson,and Lee H. Statler

Horizons Technology, Incorporated

for

Contracting Officer's RepresentativeJohn F. Hayes

Manned Systems GroupJohn F. Hayes, Chief

Systems Research LaboratoryRobin L. Keesee, Director

June 1989 DTICS ELECTE~~JUL 111989 I

United States ArmyResearch Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences

Appr ved for the public release; distribution is unimied.

U.S. ARMY RESEARCH INSTITUTE

FOR THE BEHAVIORAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES

A Field Operating Agency Under the Jurisdiction

of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel

EDGAR M. JOHNSON JON W. BLADESTechnical Director COL, IN

Commanding

Research accomplished under contractfor the Department of the Army

Horizons Technology, Incorporated

Technical review by

John Edward Stewart II

NOTICES

DISTRIBUTION: This report has been cleared for release to the Defense Technical InformationCenter (DTIC) to comply with regulatory requirements. It has been given no primary distributionother than to DTIC and will be available only through DTIC or the National Technical InformationalService (NTIS).

FINAL DISPOSITION: This report may be destroyed when it is no longer needed. Please do notreturn it to the U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.

NOTE: The views, opinions, and findings in this report are those of the author(s) and should not tobe construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy, or decision, unless sodesignated by other authorized documents.

UNCLASSIFIEDSECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE

Form Approved

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMBNo. 0704-0188

1. REPORT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION lb. RESTRICTIVE MARKINGSU nclassified --2a. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION AUTHORITY 3. DISTRIBUTION /AVAILABILITY OF REPORT

2b. DECLASSIFICATIONIDOWNGRADING SCHEDULE Approved for public release;distribution is unlimited.

4. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(S) S. MONITORING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(S)

ARI Research Note 89-306a. NAME OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION 6b. OFFICE SYMBOL 7a. NAME OF MONITORING ORGANIZATION

(If applicable) U.S. Army Research Institute for theHorizons Technology, Inc. Behavioral and Social Sciences, MSG6c. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Code) 7b. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Code)

10467 White Granite Drive 5001 Eisenhower AvenueOakton, VA 22124 Alexandria, VA 22333-5600

8.. NAME OF FUNDING/SPONSORING 8b. OFFICE SYMBOL 9. PROCUREMENT INSTRUMENT IDENTIFICATION NUMBERORGANIZATION (If applicable)

-- PERI-SM DAA9-85-G-O035

c. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Code) 10. SOURCE OF FUNDING NUMBERS

PROGRAM PROJECT TASK WORK UNITELEMENT NO. NO. NO. ACCESSiON NO.

I 63731A 792 124 Cl11. TITLE (Include Security Classification)Methods for Planning Unit and Displaced Equipment Training as Applied to the LightHelicopter Family (LHX)

12. PERSONAL AUTHOR(S)Lindquist, John W.; Robinson, Robert E.; and Statler, Lee H. (Horizons Technology, Inc.)13a. TYPE OF REPORT 13b. TIME COVERED 14. DATE OF REPORT (Year, Month, Day) IS. PAGE COUNTFinal FROM 86/07 TO 87/02 1989, June I 1r

16. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTATION

John F. Hayes, Contracting Officer's Technical Representative.

17. COSATI CODES 18. SUBJECT TERMS (Continue on reverse if necessary and identify by block number)FIELD GROUP SUB-GROUP Unit training Displaced equipment Scheduling

Training resource training LHX

Training schedule Resources Planning19. ABSTRACT (Continue on reverse if necessary and identify by block number)

-. This project investigates and develops a training scheduling method for applicationduring the materiel acquisition process. The method developed is a four-step process inwhich the analyst employs and interacts with an automated model of the training processto develop and refine alternative training schedules to ultimately arrive at an optimaltraining schedule within a given set of resource constraints. The four steps are(1) training requirements identification, (2) model development, (3) model application,and (4) analysis and comparison of training schedule alternatives. The result is aviable training schedule or set of alternative schedules for introducing a new weaponsystem into the Army force structure. The project develops prototypes for the methodby devising a schedule for initial unit training on receipt of new LHX equipment (notsustainment training) and develops a displaced equipment training (DET) program for unitsreceiving the AH-lS and OH-58 aircraft displaced by the LHX. The unit training schedule

(Continued)-

20. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY OF ABSTRACT 21. ABSTRACT SECURITY CLASSIFICATIONC3 UNCLASSIFIED/UNLIMITED C9 SAME AS RPT. 0 DTIC USERS Unclassified

22a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE INDIVIDUAL 22b. TELEPHONE (Include Area Code) 22c. OFFICE SYMBOLMaior Charles J. Hintze (202) 274-8917 1 PERI-SM

D Form 1473. JUN 86 Previous editions ore obsokete. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGEUNCLASSIFIED

i i I I I

UNCLASSIFIEDSECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGEI(he Data Entered)

ARI Research Note 89-30

19. ABSTRACT (Ovntinued)

icommences in November 1995 with the initial production of the LHX helicopterand continues through January 2005. The schedule plans training for 185active and reserve component units, with the active duty units requiring anaverage unit training time of 17.57 weeks and the reserve component unitsrequiring an average training time of 89 weeks. The DET program is a 10-week program that enables a National Guard unit to complete DET withoutany additional active duty training time but is flexible enough to useactive duty time when and if it is made available. (

Aeeess ea per

ITIS QRA&I)TIC TABUnannouunced dJustilloatie

By

Distributiton/_

Availability CodesjAvail and/or

Dist Special

UNCLASSIFIED

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF TNIS PAGE(When Data Entered)

ii

METHODS FOR PLANNING UNIT AND DISPLACED EQUIPMENT TRAINING ASAPPLIED TO THE LIGHT HELICOPTER FAMILY (LHX)

CONTENTS

Page

INTRODUCTION ............. ........................ 1

Background . .. . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .... 1Purpose . .. .. .. .. . .. . . . *.. .. .. .. .....

Scope . . .. . .. .. .. .. .. ... ... .. ..... 2Objectives. ......... ... .. ... ....... 2

Report Organization...........3

METHOD . . . . ............. ................. 3

Overview . ........ . . . . . . ......... 3Identification of Training Requirements . . . . . .. . . 4Model Development ....... . .................. 4Model Application ................ ....... 8Analysis and Comparison of Training Schedule

Alternatives .................... . ........ 8

APPLICATION TO THE LHX ....... ................... 9

Application to Unit Training .... .............. . 10Identification of LHX Training Requirements...... . .10Model Development . ..... . . . . . ......... 14Model Application .. . ....... . . . . . . . . . . 28Analysis and Comparison of Training Schedule

Alternatives .................... 34Application to Displaced Equipment Training (DET) . 37

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS . ..... ................ . . . 44

Application to the LHX . . . . . . . . .......... 44Development of a Training Schedule Model .. .......... 46

REFERENCES ......... ......................... . 47

APPENDIX A. LHX DISTRIBUTION PLAN INPUT DATA . ....... .. A-i

B. SUMMARY DATA ...... ................. . B-1

C. ALTERNATIVE 1 TRAINING SCHEDULES ... ....... C-I

iii

CONTENTS (Continued)

Page

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1. Resources required for LHX .... ............ . 13

2. Maneuver areas required during training cycle . . 16

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1. Model element 1. . . .................. 6

2. Model element 2. . . . . . . . . ......... 7

3. Timeline of training outline .. .......... . 12

4. Maneuver area required for unit 001 ..... ... 15

5. Maneuver area required for unit 002 ....... ... 15

6. Maneuver area required for unit 003 .... ....... 15

7. Training outline for three sample units ..... . 17

8. Training schedule for LHX in FY 2000 ...... . 19

9. Training schedule for baseline case withrefinement for Christmas holidays .... ..... 20

10. Deconflicted baseline case ...... ..... 21

11. Aerial gunnery range for baseline case ..... . 22

12. Maneuver area for baseline case .......... ... 23

13. OPFOR for baseline case . . . . ............ 23

14. Door gunnery range for baseline case . . .... 24

15. Tactics team trainer for baseline case ..... . 24

16. Utility flying hours for baseline case . .... 25

17. SCAT flying hours for baseline case ....... . 25

18. External TOE equipment for baseline case . ... 26

iv

CONTENTS (Continued)

Page

Figure 19. External aircraft for baseline case ...... .. 26

20. Average unit training time for baseline case . . 27

21. Administrative time for baseline case ..... . 27

22. Alternative 1 prior to deconfliction analyses 29

23. Alternative 1 after deconfliction analyses . . . 30

24. Alternative 2 prior to deconfliction analyses 32



27. Garrison facilities required for alternative 3 . 36

28. Garrison facilities required for alternative 1 . 36

29. Resources required for DET baseline case . ... 40

30. Resources required for DET alternative 1 . ... 41

31. Resources required for DET alternative 2 . ... 42

32. Training schedule for ARNG units beginningin FY 2002 . ..................... 45

v

METHODS FOR PLANNING UNIT AND DISPLACED EQUIPMENT TRAINING

AS APPLIED TO THE LIGHT HELICOPTER FAMILY (LHX)

Introduction

During the concept development and evaluation phase,estimating training requirements in detail is complicated by thesimultaneous introduction of new and emerging technologies intoan as yet hypothetical system. These new technologies areapplicable not only to the system itself but also to itstraining delivery and support systems. The effort to obtainmaximum benefit from the latest technology requires theintroduction of many other variables into the total militaryenvironment. These include introduction of new individualskills, elimination of old skills, consolidation of militaryoccupational specialties, adjustments to the force structure, andadjustments to doctrine. Furthermore, these all must bedescribed in such a way as to leave maximum flexibility for thecontractors but enable the government to evaluate theeffectiveness and efficiency of the contractor's proposal.

In light of the above, the solution to the problem must notonly make a reasonable estimate of the training requirements onthe basis of current information, the solution must also includethe ability to identify the relative sensitivity of the variouselements of the training system to changes in the entire newsystem as well as the ability to readily update the trainingestimates and plans as new information becomes available and asdecisions relating to the new system and its acquisition aremade. A top down approach is the preferred method because itmatures as information becomes available, thereby requiringadjustment only to a specific area affected as opposed to a totalrework of a data base or set of plans.

Purpose

The current research effort represents one segment of acomprehensive research program designed by the U.S. Army ResearchInstitute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences (ARI) to meetthe MANPRINT (Manpower and Personnel Integration) challenge. Itspurpose is to investigate and develop methods and models tofacilitate anO enhance training planning during the acquisitionof new weapor systems. In keeping with the ARI philosophy ofconducting MANPRINT research which provides immediate benefits tothe Army, the effort focuses on the training aspects of theLight Helicopter Family (LHX) acquisition program. The LHXprogram serves as the frame of reference for acquisitionprocedures, milestones, and timing of events. Additionally, theprototyping of the methods and models contributes to thedevelopment of the LHX program. Therefore, the second purpose ofthe research effort is to contribute to training planning forthe LHX.

1

scope

This effort will investigate two aspects of training thatemerge during the proof of concept phase of a weapon system'sacquisition. They are the training resource requirementsassociated with (1) the unit trainingI of organizations to beequipped with the new system and, (2) the individualqualification training for units which will receive the equipmentthat is displaced by the new acquisition. For the purposes ofprototyping, the method developed during the investigation is tobe applied to the LHX program to devise a fielding schedule thatadheres to the proposed procurement schedule and distributionplan and is operationally effective. The schedule will sequenceunits into a unit training program that is devised to optimizethe overall unit training time and resource requirement.Further, the method is to be applied to individual qualificationtraining for personnel assigned to units that will receive theOH-58 and AH-1S helicopters displaced by the LHX.

The specific objectives of this research effort are to: (1)translate the approved LHX Distribution Plan into a phased unittraining schedule which will result in the most cost effectiveand resource efficient method of fielding LHX units in the Activeand Reserve Components; and (2) develop an individualqualification training schedule for equipment displaced to theReserve Components which will result in the most cost effectiveand resource efficient method of fielding that displacedequipment to the Reserve Component units.

Inherent in these objectives is the development of a methodand models which may bt used to refine and expand these trainingschedules as more definitive information becomes available. Thedesired characteristics of the method and models to be developedare a top down approach to enable effective training planningbefore detailed system data are available, flexibility to acceptchanges and refinements as the system matures and data becomemore specific; and simple and relatively fast operation so as toenable the exploration of training alternatives without the needfor consensus among the acquisition community, thus preventingthe premature foreclosure of options.

Although the method and models are intended to have genericapplication to other weapon systems, this effort excludesindividual institutional training for the new weapon systemexcept as the institutional training can be identified to be

1"Unit training" in the context used throughout the reportis that initial training a unit receives on receipt of newequipment and is not sustainment training.

2

competing for the same or similar resources as unit training.Also this effort is not a job or task analysis as contemplated bythe Systems Approach to Training. The information necessary forsuch detailed and specific analysis is not available at thisearly stage of development. However, it is envisioned andintended that once those analyses are completed, the results canbe incorporated into the training system to optimize resourceutilization.

ReDort Organization

This report is presented in four sections and 3 appendices.The first section, entitled Introduction, presents an overview ofthe problem and the research conducted. The second section,entitled Method, contains an explanation of the method used toperform the research. A further description of the methoddeveloped is provided in third section, Application to the LHX.The last section, entitled Findings and Conclusions, presents theresults and conclusions of the study to include a discussion oftheir impact on developing systems.

Method

The purpose and objectives of this effort were discussed inthe Introduction. The method developed to achieve them consistsof four major steps.

1. Identification of Training Requirements2. Model Development3. Model Application4. Analysis and Comparison of Training Schedule

Alternatives

Step 1 is the determination of training requirements whichincludes identifying the target audience scheduled to receivethe developing system, determining the training required andestimating the resources needed. Step 2 is a model developmentstage in which the relationships between the training required,resources required, and an effectiveness measure are defined. InStep 3, training schedule alternatives are identified by varyingparameters such as location, and pre-positioning TOE (Table ofOrganization and Equipment) equipment, and by combining selectedtraining components. The model is then applied to alternativesdeveloped to investigate the relative sensitivities of thevarious elements of the alternatives such as resource demands,start times, and areas of training. This process is reiterateduntil the desired program effectiveness is achieved within thestipulated resource constraints or until the opportunities forimproving each alternative are exhausted. The last step is theanalysis of the model outputs in terms of program effectivenessand resource efficiency. The result is a viable trainingschedule or set of alternative schedules for transitioning a new

3

weapon syztem into the Army force structure. As the developmentprocess continues and information becomes more precise, theprocess may and should be employed to update the results.

Identification )f Trainina Reauirements

The first step of the method identifies the types oforganizatl-ins scheduled to receive the new system and thesystem's predecessors. An investigation is then made of thecomparability of existing systems and the emerging system. Whereappropriate, existing training concepts and plans are adjusted toaccommodate the new system and to incorporate advances intraining technology. If the introduction of entirely newtechnology demands it, original training concepts are alsoformulated. The concepts are then grouped according to commoncharacteristics and merged into a single cohesive outline of thetraining required for the new system. Training resourceestimates are then developed in a similar way, retaining theapplicable requirements from the predecessor systems andadjusting as necessary to implement the updated training outline.The result includes the collective tasks inherent in the unit'smission and the training resources required to perform oneiteration of each task. Successful accomplishment of this phaseentails detailed research into training literature for currentsystems to include Army Training and Evaluation Programs(ARTEPs), soldier training publications, and mission and functionstatements as well as a diligent investigation of therequirements for, and characteristics of the emerging system.Included in the latter are the entire body of studies, plans andreports required by the acquisition system and current literatureon the technologies being applied.

Model Development

The second step of the method is to model the cumulativerelationships of training resources to training requirements andto develop an algorithm to determine the most program-effectiveand resource efficient method of transitioning units receivingthe new weapon system.

Modeling Objectives. The primary objective of the model isto measure the relative effectiveness of training schedulealternatives. Specifically, the model demonstrates therelationships between training requirements and trainingresources. As part of the process, the model is calibrated tothe training outlines developed in Step 1. The calibrationprocess is accomplished by identifying the resources and rates ofconsumption required to support one iteration of the trainingoutline. In turn, it expands the outline to include provisionsto complete training for the entire transition program. Theresult is an initial training schedule to be used as a baselinecase. In order to facilitate later comparisons of alternatives,the baseline case is intentionally simplistic and avoids complexsequencing or combinations of resources.

4

The baseline case also serves as a departure point for thedevelopment of training schedule alternatives. The alternativesare arrived at by varying the sequence, combinations ofresources, and location of training in more complex ways thatappear to present opportunities to enhance effectiveness orreduce resource requirements. The model functions as a computersupported data filing, manipulation, and aggregation system thatcan be used to evaluate the alternatives.

Model Structure. The basic modeling scheme is a variant ofan input-output (Leontief) structure. An input-output structurewas chosen because it permitted rapid fidelity in the treatmentof resource requirements and was sensitive to differences intraining schedule alternatives. Leontief structures typicallyallow for electronic case filing to foster reproducibility andrapid modular correction and update capability. Due to thetentative nature of the problem, it was necessary to employ astructure that allows for easy modification and maturation asadditional information about the developing system is obtained.

Other features of an input-output structure include: theability to deal with constraints easily, the ability to developfeasible alternatives, and the ability to identify the keydrivers and limiting constraints of different alternatives.Input-output models also provide the ability to present trade-offs graphically among and within the various alternatives.

An input-output model can represent causal relationshipsbetween the training resources needed by the system and thesystem's consumers. In the model developed, the trainingrequired, the training resources required and the rate at whichtraining resources are consumed, are inputs to the model for eachtraining requirement. The model then aggregates this informationfor multiple resources, organizations, and training requirementsand establishes the resources required for an organization toaccomplish training in a given time frame.

The physical structure of the model has essentially fourdimensions that are depicted in two, three-dimensional elements.The dimensions represent the different training components orsectors of the training system. The specific componentsrepresented in the model are training resources, trainingrequirements, type of resource consumption, and time. The firstelement illustrated in Figure 1, consist of two arrays which filethe training requirements and rates of resource consumption. Thearray is stored in such a way that the information can bemanipulated and aggregated with respect to time in the secondelement of the model. The second element, illustrated in Figure2, is also stored in an array and converts the trainingrequirements, resource requirements, and the rate of consumptioninto a schedule of training required for each organization incalendar time periods. Each cube formed by the intersection ofthe planes contains the coefficient representin~g resourceconsumption in unit weeks for each organization. The aggregation

5

NUr

Fir 1. Modl leen 1

6S 'r

Figure 2. Model element 2.

provides the total amount of resources required for a certainperiod of time or during a specified time interval. A furtherdetailed discussion of the model, including an example ispresented in Application to the LHX section.

Model ARDlication

The third step of the method involves the development ofalternatives and applying the model developed in second step tothose alternatives.

Previously there was not an algorithm available thatprovided the ability to analyze training schedule alternatives.The algorithm developed is an iterative process of selectingapparent alternatives and then refining those alternatives forimproved efficiency. Alternatives are derived from the baselinecase discussed by varying the major parameters such as location,sequence, or adding or deleting resources or requirements.Alternatives constitute separate and distinct training outlines.Parameters are varied within alternatives to assess thesensitivity of the training requirements and to maximize theirefficiency and effectiveness. The modifications may includevariations in start dates for individual units, trade-offsbetween training resources and changes in constraints.

For each of the alternatives, a comparison is made acrossorganizations to be trained to determine the critical resourcesdemanded. Critical resources are those resources that aredetermined to be necessary to maintain system operability atestablished levels. They are based upon subjectiveconsiderations to include considerations of cost, real worldavailability and substitutability. Any conflicts in demand forresources and any resources for which substitution is feasibleare identified at this point. An example of conflictingresources is two or more units requiring use of a gunnery rangeat the same time. An example of a substitutable resource is theuse of an aircraft simulator for actual flying hours. Once thecritical and conflicting resources are identified, eachalternative is refined to deconflict the resources and stillaccomplish the training required on an acceptable timetable. Theprocess of resource deconfliction is reiterated until allresources have been deconflicted or until no more deconflictionscan be made without violating the developing system'sconstraints.

Analysis and Comparison of Training Schedule Alternatives

The fourth step of the method consists of analyzing themodel outputs for each alternative to determine the feasibilityof each alternative as a viable training schedule. Theevaluation of alternatives entails consideration of thecombination of resource efficiency and program effectiveness.

8

Resource efficiency may be either a subjective evaluation ofthe total distribution and amount of resources required or ifsufficient detailed information exists, it may entail expressingeach resource in common terms such as dollars or manhours.

Program effectiveness is measured in terms of the averagetime required to train a single unit, the total time required tocomplete the entire program, and the maximum number of unitstrained at any one time. It is essential to consider thecombined effect of all three measures. An apparent improvementin one measure can be to the detriment of the overall program.For example, it is conceivable that an alternative reducing thetraining time would involve a sequencing that would delay theentry of units into the program causing a delay in programcompletion and thus rendering the alternative less effective. Analternative could reduce training time and speed up completion ofthe program but in doing so might require an unacceptable numberof units which may adversely impact the effectiveness of thealternative.

The next section provides a detailed description of theapplication of these measures when evaluating training schedulealternatives for a developing system, namely the LHX.

Application to the LHX

Application of the method previously described to the LHXwas done concurrently with and was an integral part of thedevelopment of the training scheduling model. The nature of theproject was such that at times the information available drovethe architecture of the model and at other stages the demands ofthe model established the requirement for specific elements ofdata. There were two distinct applications attempted. The firstdeveloped an optimal unit training schedule for the LHX thatadheres to the proposed procurement schedule and distributionplan. Subsequently, the method was applied to investigate theindividual qualification training required to staff reserveunits scheduled to receive the OH-58 and AH-1S helicoptersdisplaced by the LHX. The LHX program lends itself well to theprototyping role because it is sufficiently complex to exercisethe method fully. That is, the LHX is a technologicallysophisticated emerging weapon system subjected to a streamlinedacquisition process and is incorporating the MANPRINT initiativein its development. Applying the method to the LHX requirescompleting the following four steps as discussed in Methodsection.

1. Identification of LHX Training Requirements2. Model Development3. Model Application4. Analysis and Comparison of Training Schedule

Alternatives

9

Aoglication To Unit Trainina

The primary driver of the model development and applicationsteps of the method was the investigation of trainingrequirements of units scheduled to receive the LHX. Unitsreceiving the LHX are good candidates for top down demonstrationsince the LHX program is still under development and unittraining requirements for the system have yet to be defined andare dependent upon the technology incorporated into the system.The top down approach employed to develop the model is consistentwith the lack of detailed definition for the system's trainingrequirements. Furthermore, it provides the opportunity tointegrate a higher level of detail as more information regardingthe LHX becomes available.

Identification of LHX Trainina ReMuirements

To estimate the unit training needed accurately for allunits receiving LHX aircraft required the identification of thenumbers of unit types receiving the system. From an examinationof the Draft LHX Distribution Plan (U.S. Army, 1986), it wasdetermined that 54 attack, 53 utility, 62 reconnaissance, and 16medevac units were scheduled to receive LHX aircraft. Appendix Acontains tables displaying the unit types for all LHX units, theassociated parent units, the areas where units are to be deployedand the sequence in which they are scheduled to receive theaircraft. To avoid the need for a security classification, itwas necessary to develop training schedules in accordance withthe procurement schedule without reference to specific individualunits or areas of location.

After consolidating the data in the LHX Distribution Plan,an investigation was made of the comparability of the predecessorsystems to the LHX. In the case of the LHX, the predecessorsystems examined were the AH-1S, OH-58, UH-60, UH-1, and the AH-64. These systems were selected for the comparability analysesin order to represent the spectrum of missions to be performedand to approximate the level of technology of the LHX mostclosely. Although the AH-64 (Apache) and UH-60 (Blackhawk) arenot light helicopters and will not be displaced by the LHX,training references were reviewed for the Apache and Blackhawkaircraft because they are the most technologically advanced incomparison to the LEX. From the review of predecessor systemtraining documents, the unit training requirements for eachsystem were determined and compared to the general trainingrequirements of the LHX. Specifically the question was asked, dothe missions still exist and does the application of advancedtechnology change the inherent tasks or methods of training forthose missions? Therefore, LHX documents including theIndividual and Collective Training Plan for the LHX (U.S. ArmyAviation Systems Command (USAAVSCOM], 1985), Annex F to theRequired Operational Capabilities (ROC) for the LHX (U.S. ArmyAviation Center, 1985), and the LHX Full Scale DevelopmentRequest for Proposal (USAAVSCOM, 1986) were examined to

10

determine training differences between the LHX and predecessorsystems. The examination of LHX documentation provided for theincorporation of new training concepts brought about by advancesin training technology. Although many of the skills, knowledges,and individual tasks will change, there is no indication thatthere will be any significant changes in the collective trainingtasks for the LHX. For example, the automated cockpit willchange gunnery tasks but primarily from an individual as opposedto a collective training perspective.

The training requirements for each type of LHX unit weregrouped into training outlines that specify the training requiredfor a particular type unit to achieve full mission capability.The investigation indicated a high correlation between LHX andAH-64 unit training. Therefore, the AH-64 unit training phaseswere perpetuated. They are the following:

Phase I - Individual and Crew TrainingPhase II - Company and Unit TrainingPhase III - Gunnery TrainingPhase IV - Battalion TrainingPhase V - ARTEP

Although the aircrew qualification course (AQC2 ) is notconsidered collective training, it was considered throughout theeffort for its resource impact on other phases of unit training.Based upon information in the AH-64 Unit Training Plan, it wasestimated that the five phases of unit training and AQC for theLHX, would be accomplished in a 20 week time frame. Figure 3 isa timeline displaying the training outline for a typical LHXequipped unit. For the purposes of this analysis, a unit is acompany-sized organization. It is important to note thatalthough all LHX unit training can be catalogued into one of thefive phases, there are some units that do not undergo training ineach of these phases. For example, most of LHX utility units donot perform battalion level training. Also there are two TDA(Table of Distribution and Allowances) units scheduled to receiveLHX utility aircraft and these organizations only performindividual AQC.

Training resource estimates were established in much thesame way by re-examining the requirements for the predecessoraircraft systems for applicable resources and adding resourcesspecific to the LHX. They were then combined into packages sizedto implement a single iteration of each of the training outlines.Resources specific to the LHX include the tactical team trainer,the Integrated LHX Training System, and the Dummy Stinger.

2AQC, as used throughout this report, refers to individualtraining which both officer and enlisted personnel receive tobecome MOS (Military Occupational Specialty) or ASI (AdditionalSkill Identifier) qualified on the new equipment.

11

I'

Figure 3. Timeline of training outline.

12

Table 1 illustrates the resource packages identified foreach of the different LHX missions. A total of 19 resourcepackages were identified for LHX units performing attackmissions. A total of 20 resource packages were identified forthe units performing utility missions. An examination ofpredecessor system documents revealed that training for unitsperforming reconnaissance missions requires the same resources astraining for units performing attack missions. The same is truefor utility and medevac units. Therefore, throughout the rest ofthis discussion, the training outlines for attack and utilityunits apply to reconnaissance and medevac units respectively.

Table 1

Resources Required for LHX

Required Resources Identified for LHX Attack and ReconnaissanceMissions

Maneuver Area Dummy HellfireClassroom and Briefing Rooms Dummy StingerAirfield and Stagefield ATGM (AntiTank GuidedGarrison Facilities Missile) SystemAerial Gunnery Range Flying HoursOpposing Forces (OPFOR) External AircraftFriendly Forces External TOE EquipmentEvaluators MaintenanceIntegrated SCAT (Scout/Attack) SupplyTraining System Tactical Team Trainer

MILES/AGES (Multiple IntegratedLaser Engagement Simulation/Air-to-Air Ground EngagementSystem)

Required Resources Identified for LHX Utility and MedevacMissions

Maneuver Area Dummy HellfireClassroom and Briefing Rooms Dummy StingerAirfield and Stagefield ATGM SystemGarrison Facilities Flying HoursAerial Gunnery Range External AircraftOPFOR External TOE EquipmentFriendly Forces MaintenanceEvaluators SupplyIntegrated Utility Training System Tactical Team TrainerMILES/AGES RCMAT

13

Model Development

An objective of the model's application to the LHX trainingsystem was to develop an effective and resource efficientschedule for conducting unit training of the LHX. To that end,the training outlines developed previously were expanded toinclude the resources and rates of consumption necessary tosupport the training required in the outlines. The modelconverts the outlines and resources to a file containing totaltraining required by week for the entire program. Theaggregation of training outlines into a single proposed trainingschedule represents the baseline case from which alternativeswere developed.

An example of the model applied to a simple case in whichonly one resource is considered for three units is describedbelow. In this case, the resource under consideration is"maneuver area." Figures 4 through 6 present the number ofmaneuver areas needed for each phase of unit training for threedifferent units respectively. In this case, unit 001 and 003require one maneuver area for each phase of training, exceptgunnery. Unit 002 is a utility unit and requires maneuver areasfor all phases except the gunnery phase and battalion phase oftraining.

The three units are then combined as shown in Table 2 toillustrate the amount of maneuver areas needed for each week ofthe training cycle during each of the training phase, Thescheduling of units begins at the first full week after theaircraft is delivered to the unit. Table 2 can be displayed inFigure 7 where each bar represents a unit's requirement formaneuver areas throughout the training cycle. Figure 7illustrates the possible conflicts where multiple units competefor the same resource. In this example, the start time of unit003 in Figure 7 can be shifted eight weeks to the right in orderto reduce the conflict of maneuver areas between unit 001 andunit 003. This example can be expanded to include all unitsreceiving the LHX and to include all resource packages necessaryto complete one iteration of the training cycle.

The baseline case demonstrates the relationships between thetraining required and the training resources needed to transitionLHX units. In keeping with the objective of developing abaseline case that is simplistic and avoids complex sequencing oftraining events, the baseline case used for the LHX is one inwhich all units perform all unit training with the exception ofgunnery (Phase III) at their home stations with TOE equipment.Gunnery training requires ranges and firing areas which are notusually available at each unit's home station. Although AQC isnot considered collective training, it was considered throughoutthe effort for its resource impact on other phases of unittraining.

14

INDIV/ CO GUNNERY IN ARTEPAQC CREV

MANEUVER 1ARA1 1 1 0 1 1AREA

FIGURE 4. MANEUVER AREA REQUIRED FOR UNIT 001

INDXV/AQC CREI CO GUNNERY SN ARTEP

M EUVER 1 1AREA

FIGURE 5. MANEUVER AREA REQUIRED FOR UNIT 002

AQC INI/ CO GUNNER BN ARTEPCREV

MANEUVER 1 0

AREA IFIGURE 6. MANEUVER AREA REQUIRED FOR UNIT 003

15

Table 2

Maneuver Areas Required During Training Cycle

HASEINDIV/

WEEK AQC CREW CO GUNNERY BN ARTEP

1 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

2 1 ,_,_,3 2 , ,,4 2 ....

5 36 3

7 3 ,3 , ,

9 21_10 2 1 ... .

11 1 1 112 1 1 113 214 _1 2 _

15 2 016 2 0 117 1 0 118 1 0 1 1

20 0 1 121 1 022 1 023 1 024

16

w_ NN

o _Y

/ C

ca~E4

Figure 7. Training outline for three sample units.

17

Figure 8 displays the baseline case for the fielding of theLX in fiscal year (FY) 2000. FY 2000 was chosen as the slice tobe investigated since it is the year in which the greatest amountof LHX aircraft will be fielded and thus will present the mostdifficulty when planning unit training. The schedule displayedin Figure 8 is based upon the LHX Distribution Plan. Units werescheduled to begin individual and crew training (Phase I) at theearliest possible start time (i.e., upon receipt of equipment).From that point a period of 10 weeks was added preceding Phase Itraining for AQC3 . This 10 week period allows two weeks fortravel time to and from AQC. Examining Figure 8, it can be seenthat unit training for the LHX in FY 2000 will be accomplished in58 weeks with an average unit training time of 24 weeks.

The next step in the model development process for the LHXwas to identify the critical resources to be examined for thebaseline case and throughout the analysis of each alternative.The critical resources were identified based upon the subjectiveconsideration of cost, real world availability, and impact ontraining. The following is a list of the critical resources forLHX unit training in order of descending importance.

Administrative timeFlying hoursAerial gunnery rangeManeuver areaOPPORExternal aircraftExternal TOE equipmentTactics Team TrainerDoor gunnery range

In the initial application of the baseline case, there is aconflict within 10 SCAT units since Christmas falls within weeks10 and 15. Historically, the U.S. Army Training and DoctrineCommand (TRADOC) has not conducted training over the Christmasholidays nor is it operationally practical to conduct trainingduring this time. Therefore, the baseline case was modified toallow for a two week administrative period for those unitsscheduled for training during the holidays. This rationale canalso be applied to the utility units since the holidays affectseven utility units. Figure 9 illustrates this refinement in thebaseline case for both SCAT and utility units.

When allowing for a break in training for the holidays, 15SCAT units are affected. More than 50% of the SCAT unitscomplete training in 37.9 weeks and the average unit trainingtime increases from 24 weeks to 24.8 weeks. Eleven utility unitsare affected by the two week break during the holidays. Morethan 50% of the utility units complete training in 28.7 weeks andthe average unit training time is 17.2 weeks.

3AQC is identified by the letter "N" in Figure 8.

18

6 U ITO 00UVMbed4~ U ITO 001 -0UU IT 00-3U15

1I1 ITIHIT 0O -05

U7 HITC 1711 IUNA TOO NJU Tj-7

6A~~~ ~ UI IjtIOI A NT jOIr~~~UI 0-30 NI -9

UNI T-31

UIT0-3

19

-A IT 00 -0208

UN~ ~ IT .. hU 00 -0308

UN1 00- 60'- IUN GOO- 7R- .UN 100- SR- 4UN 100- 9A

_UN T00- OR__UNI 00-A4% UNI 00-A

IT100 -14R* ...... U IT 00 -15R

U11 00 -16Rr A A A.. NIT 0 -170U

VifI I4I NITO0 -IOUNITO0 -2013NIT 0 -210U

I~ - IL j..~ 'r INa , UNIM 00-21 M1

ITO~ 00- 2 J11 km UL... .. ,hUIT00- 25A

It .41) 100 26Afilm !A IrUM 100 27R11 N 4"1 U 1T00 28RINI , 9 .I IUNIT 0-291

UNT0:30AP UNIT 0-31

0 - Ur LiT 0-32YM UNIT 0-33

I.. ..U IT 00-

of UNIT 00-4 IR0 5 10 15 20 25 30 'J 0 455 60

Figure 9. Training schedule for baseline case with refinementfor Christmas holidays.

From an examination of Figure 9, it can be seen that afterallowing for a break in training over Christmas, there remains alarge number of units attending AQC4 at one time. Specifically,there are 17 units scheduled to be attending AQC at week 22 which

4AQC is identified by the letter 'IN" in Figure 9.

20

would require a 40% improvement in the student to aircraft ratioover the current student to aircraft ratio for the AH-ISaircraft. Such an improvement is not likely. Therefore, thebaseline case was refined again as shown in Figure 10, to reducethe number of units attending AQC5 at any one time.

.U IT 00 2118D

UNI 0 SUSUNI 00 6UIM

AUNIT0 7R

UNIT 00 9RVL UNIT 00- OR

inA UN! 00-1 A

14 UNI1 00-1 A.U ITO I4R

I. 4U IT 00ISR~ ..U ITO 0-16R11

I ff 19A INIT 0 -17U1211,11 . If NIT 09-loU11 U 00.191.'

I U IT 00 .20U I* U 7I00-210U

- U IT 00 22fl- ~ A~4UN T00- 3M1

.4U IT 00 .25Aj9, &UIT 0026A

-4 AA UNT00-.,711- .4L 4WUN 00O SR.IN 1 101 leiI1 UNIT 00 -24R

-1 "I " 11 UNIT 00-3 R-A '2 fL. WC UNIT 003 A-1 k4l. NI UNIT 00-3 A-~ .L. UNI 00-3 Ati I d 11 1 1UNIT 0-341

UNIT 0-351

iUNI 00-3 UNT0-7

0~~~~I 5 10 15 2 2 3 4

Figure 10. Deconflicted baseline case.

5AQC is identified by the letter "NI" in Figure 10.

21

The other nine critical resources were examined for thebaseline case. Figures 11 through 21 illustrate the distributionof each of the critical resources required throughout thetraining cycle for the baseline case. However, upon examination,no substantial conflicts were identified that could bedeconflicted in such a way as to reduce training burdens andmaintain a reasonable unit training time. This finding is inkeeping with the definition of the baseline case of simplicityand maximum independence among training requirements.

___242220is16.14

112

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55WEEKS

Figure 11. Aerial gunnery range for baseline case.

22

242220Is1614

Lk -12

I0

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 WEEKS

Figure 12. Maneuver area for baseline case.

S00450400350300

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 WEEKS

Figure 13. OPFOR for baseline case.

23

20____ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ _ I

12

* o1 15 20 25 30 35 40 -45 50 55SWEEKS

Figure 14. Door gunnery range for baseline case.

* 5 to 15 20 25 S0 35 40 .45 50 55VEEKS

Figure 15. Tactics team trainer for baseline case.

24

___ ___ ___ __ ___ ___ __ ___ ___ ___ __ ___ ___ __ ___ ___ __ 1000

900G00

700

400

300

or 200

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 WEEKS

Figure 16. Utility flying hours for baseline case.

___ ___ ___ ___ ___ __ ___ ___ ___ ___ __ ___ ___ ___ ___ __1000

800

700

250

20to36141210

6

-2

a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 WEEKS

Figure 18. External TOE equipment for baseline case.

20

1210

0 5, 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55SWEEKS

Figure 19. External aircraft for baseline case.

26

3027

2s

21

12

o 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55WEEKS

Figure 20. Average unit training time for baseline case.

20

1614

272

Model APglication

After refinement and calibration of the model for thebaseline case, three unit training schedule alternatives weredeveloped for each type of LHX unit. They were derived from thebaseline case by varying the location of training from homestations to area training centers, pre-positioning equipment,eliminating training Phases I and III, and combinations of thesealternatives. Appendix B presents training schedules, unittraining times and critical resource distribution graphs of thebaseline case and each alternative.

Sensitivity analyses were performed on each of the threealternatives and the baseline case in an attempt to deconflictcritical training resources and to provide unit training to thelargest number of units in the smallest amount of time. Theseanalyses were done for the LHX by varying unit start times fortraining, and varying administration time within a trainingcycle. This process of resource deconfliction and reduction wasrepeated for each of the three alternatives.

Alternative 1. Alternative 1 was derived from the baselinecase by eliminating Phases I and III from the unit trainingschedule. In this excursion, an examination was made of theresource and training time impact when individual and crew, andgunnery training was conducting during AQC. Figure 22illustrates this alternative before any deconfliction analyseshave been performed. In this case, the average unit trainingtime is 17.6 weeks with more than 50% of all units completingtraining by week 32 of FY 2000. Upon examination of the ninecritical resources required throughout the training cycle forthis alternative, it was determined that in week 23, 20 aerialgunnery ranges are required. This is not surprising since therewill be 20 units undergoing AQC6 at this time.

From an examination of Figure 22, it was noticed that onlyseven units are attending AQC during week 24. These seven unitsalso contribute to the gunnery conflict in week 23. Thus thescheduled start times of the units with aerial gunnery rangeconflicts were shifted, as illustrated in Figure 23, so thatthere would be a more uniform number of units attending AQC

7

during this time frame, thus reducing the number of aerialgunnery ranges required in week 23 to 14.

The remaining critical resources were examined foradditional conflicts. However, it was determined that there wereno substantial conflicts in critical resources demanded thatcould be reduced without a large increase in unit training time.Comparing the alternative before and after resource



28

deconflictiofl, the average unit training time remains unchangedwhile the time required for 50% of the units to completetraining is increased by .9 weeks.

IN 9 i R _U IT 00 01115It I li; IU IT 00 02115

U ITO 00 3UBI

UNIk00-l 5UuNI00- 6us

- j NIT 0 -07R-t 124.C MIT 0 -OSR

17r NIT 0 -09R

Ut-IOI

N1 0037IT~0 008R

VrI % 'A:U IT 00. 15R'A:UNI U0I-00 16

0 5 tO 15 20 25 3 0 -1075U0 55 S

Figure ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~I 22 lentv ro OdefIo aayss

NI 0 9

S' iTU I 0 UBU ~ R2" A U ITT0 O0 2U

'AU IT 00 03UBUI T 6-- 406

UNIT 00- 5U4UrNI 00- SUR

-N' NIT 0 -07RIV 17r Ni -08Rt 19NIr 0 -09Rit_ NIT 0-1011

W A I U IT00 1 IAU IT O0 12AU IT O0 13A

A U IU TO0. 14R-'R UITO0 15R

V k U IT 00 16R.9'r , oro -17U-- 'A NITO0 -IOU

U ITOO 191.1U IT 00 29UGU IT 00211 1

U IT 00. 221C' A UNIT 00- 31

'9 -R U 00- 24A_t .AT 00 25A

TIT 00- 26A9c ,AUNIT 00- 7R

-1 UNIT 00 RI _ _-_ I UNI 00-2 R

41 UNI 00-3 R-- B_ UNIT 00-3 A

UNIT 00-3 A-_ UNI 00-31A

SUN IT 0-34-. UNIT 0-351

Ir UN 00-3 U"1 NIT 0 -37R

19 rNIT 0 -38RU N -U* IT 00 40R

X___ __ --1 UNIT 00-41R0 5 10 15 20 25 30 5 40 45 50 ' 55 60

Figure 23. Alternative 1 after deconfliction analyses.

30

Alternative 2. The second alternative is one in which alltraining is conducted at one central training location withphases I and III subsumed in AQC8 . From an examination ofAlternative 1, it was determined that the resource consumptionand effectiveness degradation was of sufficient magnitude toconvince the research team that in no case would training beeffective or efficient unless Phases I and III were subsumed inAQC. Thus, the remaining alternatives developed assume thatindividual and crew and gunnery training will be performed duringAQC. Figure 24 illustrates the scheduling of units for thisalternative before any deconfliction analyses are performed. Inthis case, the average unit training time is 17.7 weeks and thetime required for 50% of the units to complete training is 31.3weeks. Upon examining the distribution of the nine criticalresources, it was determined that in weeks 4-7, there was arequirement for 16 aerial gunnery ranges whereas a maximum of 12ranges is required during the remaining weeks. Additionally, itwas determined that in weeks 14-18, a total of 13 maneuver areasare required whereas most training requiring maneuver areasrequires less than 10 maneuver areas at any one time.

In an attempt to balance better the number of maneuver areasand aerial gunnery ranges required, it was noticed that therequirement for aerial gunnery ranges only occurred when unitswere undergoing AQC and that the requirement for maneuver areasoccurred when units were undergoing company, battalion, or ARTEPtraining. Thus when deconfliction analyses were performed byrescheduling the number of units undergoing AQC and therebyreducing the number of aerial gunnery ranges required, the numberof units performing company level, battalion level, or ARTEPtraining increased. The increase in the number of unitsundergoing company, battalion, or ARTEP training also increasedthe number of maneuver areas required. Likewise, attempting toreduce the amount of maneuver areas required by reschedulingunits to balance better the number of units performing company,battalion, or ARTEP training at one time resulted in an increasein the number of units undergoing AQC. Thus a balance betweenthe two was required as shown in Figure 25. When deconflictingfor aerial gunnery ranges and maneuver areas, the average unittraining time is decreased to 17.6 weeks and the time requiredfor 50% of the units to complete training is increased to 32.4weeks. However, the trade-off of time to numbcr of units trainedprovided a reduction of two maneuver areas and two aerial gunneryranges required at any one time.

Alternative 3. The third possible alternative to conductunit training was to conduct all training with the exception ofAQC at area training centers. Before any deconfliction analyseswere performed, Alternative 3 is identical to Alternative 1because the resources required are the same for each unit as whenthey are conducting training at their home stations. The

8AQC is identified by the letter "N" in Figures 24 and 25.

31

K A9 MITO0 -01IT 0 -02U

NITO -03UI 0 40

lk I V) -UN 0 5 .UNIT 00 6U

UNIT 0-0SU UNIT 0-08

UNIT 0-09F, UNIT 0-10

NIT 0 -1ANIT 0 -12A

U L -- N IT 0 - 1 3 A, A_.. -- NIT 0 -14R

iR I U NIT 0 -1R'VNITO0 -16R

.. 01. N IT 0 -17U

INI TO OUANIT 0 20U5NITO0 -2 1U"

- I 2 UN O- 2"lUN 00-13

or R.L UI 0024AU T~ U OO5AU T~ 00TO26A

- ~U IT 00 27R,. U T 0 UNI 00- R

- UN17 00-3 RI "UNI 00-3A

-U 00-3 A- UNICO 0- A

-UNIT

0-34r.r

I UNIT 0-3

W2 NIT T -30RN r T 0 -3 Ra Al NIT 0 -40R

_" UNIT 00-41R

• 5 1 0 I S 2 0 2 5 3 0 a .4 0 6 0

Fiqure 24. Alternative 2 prior to deconfliction analyses.

32

j U1 R A9NIT 0 -011V NIT 0 -02

NIT 0 -031!II UT 00- 40

UNIT 00 5UGUN T0 6U

UNIT -07UNI --08

r UNIT 0-09UNIT 0-10

_AlNITO -1 I A'A NIT 0 -12A

NIT 0 -13ARs AlU ITO0 14R

I ' "U ITO0 15RA "U ITO0 16R

- 0 -17UA NIT 0 -SSU

NIT -IgUNIT 0 -20U4NIT 0 -21U

- ~UN TO0- 1-9UN T00-4 3M1

R' 'Al UU 00-24AI - U IT 00 25A

t _U IT 0, 26A- IT 00 7R

-h n T ,OUNSRR UN UN 9R

UN 0OR_ UN 00-1A

UN 00- 2AUN 0- 3A

- UN 00-4R-UN 00-SR1

- ~.A.. UNI 0-3 U_1Lc UNI 00-3 R

le- oUNI 00-3 RC A UNIT0'

UNIJ 00-40RUNIT 00-4 1R

0 5 to IS 20 25 30 35 4045 60


33

critical resources were then examined and the alternative wasrefined to reduce the number of units requiring aerial gunneryranges during week 22 as was discussed in Alternative 1. Afterrefining the schedule to deconflict any of the criticalresources, Alternative 3, as shown in Figure 26, remainsidentical to Alternative 1.

The only resource that may be affected when training at areatraining centers is "garrison facilities" since in Alternative 3,units would be training away from home station throughout thetraining cycle. Figure 27 illustrates the amount garrisonfacilities required throughout the training cycle for thisalternative. Upon examination, it can be seen that in week 32,there is a requirement for 21 garrison facilities, whereas inAlternative 1, only a maximum of 14 garrison facilities arerequired (Figure 28). However since this alternative has alreadybeen deconflicted in Alternative 1 to the maximum extent possiblewithout a large increase in training time, it is not possible toreduce the number of garrison facilities required to train unitsat area training centers without increasing the training time.Therefore, there is no difference in Alternative 1 andAlternative 3 in the average unit training time or in the time ittakes to complete training.

Analysis and Comparison of Training Schedule Alternatives

The model applications were examined by the research team todetermine the most feasible scheduling alternative in terms oftotal number of units trained and resource requirements forfielding the LHX. The alternative selected achieves the desiredobjective to schedule unit training in the most effective mannerand remains within the resource constraints established by thesystem.

When comparing the baseline case and the three alternatives,it can be seen that unit training for the LHX in FY 2000 would beaccomplished between week 53 and week 58 where the baseline caserequires the longest time (58 weeks) to accomplish training.Alternative 1 requires the least number of weeks to achieve unitmission capability for all units undergoing training in thatyear. The average unit training time for the baseline case andeach alternative is summarized below.

AVERAGE UNITALTERNATIVE TRAINING TIME (weeks)Baseline 22.2Alt. 1 17.6Alt. 2 17.6Alt. 3 17.6

Upon examination, it can be seen that there is no realdifference between the three alternatives in terms of averageunit training time. Additionally, the time required for 50% ofthe units to complete training varied only by .2 weeks between

34

IT 0S @11IT* @2I5IT 0 0315

0 4

-NIT -97Rlit MIT -*R

MNIT -IOR-W A IT 0011

il 'A'&1100112AIT@13A

a ~IT 00 14RWd IR ITO 00 SR

NIT -IOU1I Id ITOID 19UQ

IT 00 20UGIT@00 21UG

-TCAIT 00 22M

I Vd T 00 25A

IT 21T

NMUNI @0-2 RLP #h UI @0-3 R

4p - UNIT 00-3 A4 2 UNIT 00-3 A

IRIc-;UNIT 0- AI in I UNIT 0-:34

-- U_ UNIT 0--. UNt @0-3 U

9 -2A NIT -37PSNIT -3MR

-IT00140RUNIT 00-41R

* Is is 20 25 30 5 40 145 50 5 60


35

2422

____ ___ ____ ___16

14IA I 11_11_1_1__)___ 12

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 WEEKS

Figure 27. Garrison facilities required for alternative 3.

___ ___ ___ ___ ___ __ ___ ___ ___ ___ __ ___ ___ ___ ___ __24

141210

4

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 iEEKS

Figure 28. Garrison facilities required for alternative 1.

36

the three alternatives. The time required for 50% of the unitsto complete training did vary significantly between the threealternatives and the baseline case. The time required for 50%of the units to complete training was determined to be 35.4 weeksfor the baseline case whereas the time required for 50% of theunits to complete training for the alternatives ranged from 32.2to 32.4 weeks.

After examining the critical resources required for eachalternative and the baseline case, it was determined that theresource requirements did not vary significantly between thetraining possibilities except in the case of aerial gunneryranges, and maneuver areas.

In the case of aerial gunnery ranges, the baseline caserequires a maximum of 17 aerial gunnery ranges at one particulartime whereas the alternatives only require a maximum of 14 aerialgunnery ranges at any one time. The baseline case requires moreaerial gunnery ranges because gunnery training, Phase III, isconducted at home stations. In all other alternatives, gunnerytraining is conducted during AQC and thus fewer aerial gunneryranges can used for a larger number of units.

When examining the maximum number of maneuver areas requiredfor each of the different alternatives and the baseline case, itwas determined that all cases require a maximum of 15 maneuverareas with the exception of Alternative 2 which only requires amaximum of 11. Alternative 2 is the case in which all unittraining is conducted at one central training location, thus thetotal number of maneuver areas required is less because moreunits can occupy one maneuver area when scheduled accordingly.

ApDlication To Disnlaced EauiDment Training (DET)

A slightly varied approach was taken to address theindividual and qualification training for the reserve unitsreceiving equipment displaced by the LHX. The primary differencebetween the baseline case developed for LHX units and reserveunits is that since the displaced systems currently exist in theforce structure, the training requirements for units receivingdisplaced equipment have already been established. The methodapplied to the scheduling of displaced equipment units coincideswith the method applied to LHX equipped units in that the foursteps were followed. The training requirements of the systemswere first identified and the model of a baseline case was thenestablished. Alternatives were developed from the baseline caseand then applied to the model to investigate the sensitivities ofthe various elements on the training system. Finally, ananalysis was performed on the different alternatives to evaluatethe effectiveness and resource efficiency of the system.

The research was limited to an investigation of individualtraining requirements to become qualified in the AH-lS aircraftbecause it requires the most significant individual qualification

37

training and provides the highest percentage of personnel to betrained when compared to the other aircraft system beingdisplaced. Once the training requirements have beensuccessfully established for the AH-lS, success is assured forthe OH-58 because the training and resources required are lessthan those required for the AH-IS.

Identification of Trainina Reauirements. Unlike the processrequired to identify the training requirements for the LHX,identification of the training requirements for DET required onlya review of the Program of Instruction (POI) for the AH-lS.Because individual qualification training already exists for theAH-IS, there was no need to estimate any new resources requiredof the system. The POI contained a list of the training requiredto qualify aviators, for both active and reserve personnel, inthe operation of the AH-lS helicopter. Additionally, it providedthe quantity and cost of the resources required to accomplish onecourse iteration. The complete training cycle is to beaccomplished in a six week time period with the maximum number ofaviators per class restricted to 26. The training required fordisplaced equipment training consists of the following sixcomponents.

1. Transition Training2. Combat Skills and Gunnery Training3. Aircraft Systems Training4. Weapon Systems Training5. Tactical Subjects Training6. Performance Planning

The resources required to accomplish this training include:instructor pilots, platform instructors, aircraft, assortedtraining devices, facilities, ammunition, ranges, and AH-1Sflight simulators. Several time resources are also required toconduct training such as drill time, academic hours, and the mostcritical, Active Duty Time (ADT). ADT was determined to be themost critical resource because it is very costly since reservepersonnel must be paid per diem while serving on active statusand only two weeks of ADT per year are required of them. Allother ADT is accomplished only on a voluntary basis.

Model Development. The baseline case used to developalternatives for training those reserve component units receivingthe AH-lS was one in which all displaced equipment training isconducted at one central training center. This was chosen as thebaseline case because individual qualification training for theAH-lS is currently conducted at a central training center, namelythe U.S. Army Aviation Center at Fort Rucker, Alabama. As moreactive units receive the LHX, there will be fewer active dutypersonnel requiring individual qualification training and morereservists requiring DET. Figure 29 illustrates the amount ofresources required in the baseline case to train one battalionsize unit in each of the six training requirements.

38

In this case all training is performed at Fort Rucker andsince the length of the individual qualification course isestablished at 6.2 weeks, it will require 6.2 weeks of ADT9 toqualify reservists in the AH-iS under this option. Although thisoption requires a large amount of ADT, it also requires the leastamount of training resources needed for the largest amount oftraining to be accomplished in one year. In the baseline case atotal of five battalions can undergo individual qualificationtraining using one set of resources in a one year period.

Model ADDlication. The first alternative developed from thebaseline case discussed above is one that investigates thefeasibility of conducting as much as possible of the individualqualification training for reservists receiving displacedequipment at home stations using TOE equipment. This alternativeonly requires two weeks of ADT since the only training that isbeing conducted at a central training center is the transitiontraining and aircraft systems training. The remainder of thetraining would be accomplished in eight weeks consisting of threedrill days per week. Figure 30 illustrates the amount oftraining resources required to conduct DET for one battalion sizeunit under this alternative.

The second alternative is a combination of the baseline caseand the first alternative. In this case, it is assumed that somepeople will be available to attend individual qualificationtraining on active duty status and that some will accomplishindividual qualification training during regular drill time.Figure 31 illustrates the resources required for this alternativewhen 50% of reservists train for six weeks at one centraltraining location. In this case, it will require 6.2 weeks ofADT time10 for 50% of Army National Guard (ARNG)ll personnel tobecome AH-lS qualified with the remainder of ARNG personnelbecoming AH-1S qualified in 10 weeks.

Analysis and Comoarison of Training Schedule Alternatives.Because the AH-iS redistribution plan is not available, thesequence or number of units needed to be trained is not known andprohibits the ability to develop a training schedule for ARNGunits undergoing DET. Another limiting factor in determining atraining schedule for personnel requiring DET is that thepercentage of people requiring training is not known since thereare some people in ARNG units that are already AH-1S qualified

91f one totals the ADT (Weeks) row in Figure 29, the resultis in excess of 6.2 weeks. This is because some of the trainingfor the various components occurs concurrently.

1OSee Footnote 9.

1 1ARNG in the context used throughout the rest of the reportrefers tn the Reserve Components, i.e., Army National Guard andArmy Reserve.

39

0 0II

a*4 UNS 0 94 S4 a

- -

iIII

WEEEo 1 I

Fiqure 29. Resources required for DET baseline case.

40

i , . .i I l l H I l mi

Sliii 1212iO,

[ "0

Figure 30. Resources required for DET alternatiVe 1.

41

• i.IiI N i lli i II l- - --l

3 ia n m m m. , -

i * 'N S, - m -

42.

• ee mm u - - -| m m m m

and do not require training. Due to the lack of availableinformation, the only operational, and reasonably accurate methodto evaluate the feasibility of the alternatives developed is asubjective one in which the baseline case and the twoalternatives are compared on the basis of the number of resourcesrequired, and the length of time to accomplish training.

Although the baseline case presents the method in whichindividual qualification training in currently conducted, it isnot the most feasible way in which to conduct individualqualification training for reservists receiving equipmentdisplaced by the LHX. Reservists are only required to take twoweeks of ADT per year and to conduct DET for reserve units at onecentral training location would require 6.2 contiguous weeks.This is not feasible as most reservists would have to take leavefrom their primary job in order to become AH-lS qualified.

Alternative 1 requires only two weeks of ADT which coincideswith the amount of ADT required for ARNG personnel each year. Inthis alternative it is assumed that unit training normallyrequiring ADT would be accomplished in the fiscal year precedingthe arrival the aircraft. Comparing this alternative with thebaseline case, four weeks of pay and allowances are saved perstudent since only two weeks are spent using ADT as opposed tosix weeks of ADT required in the baseline case. However,Alternative 1 extends the training time required per unit by fourweeks.

Alternative 2 allows for the maximum flexibility forscheduling the training of instructor personnel, and other keypersonnel. These ARNG personnel are the most likely personnel toattend training at a central training center since they are fulltime ARNG personnel and are continuously on active duty status.

When comparing the three possible means to accomplishindividual qualification training for ARNG personnel, it appearsthat the most realistic alternative is Alternative 2.Alternative 2 provides the option of accomplishing trainingcompletely at a central training center or only performing thetransition training at a central training center. The optimalmix of the baseline case and Alternative 1 is dependent upon thenumber of full time ARNG personnel needed to be trained and thedistribution of aircraft.

Until detailed information becomes available regarding thenumber of personnel to be trained and the re-distribution ofaircraft, it is not possible to develop an actual trainingschedule. However, once the information is available, theoptimum number of personnel to attend full individual andqualification training at Fort Rucker can be established usingthe method developed in this research effort.

43

Findings and Conclusions

ApDlication To The LHX

The application of the method developed to the LHX providedthe research team with the ability to validate the model andprocedures developed as well as develop a training schedule forthe fielding of the LHX. The method was applied to both unittraining and DET training to certify the flexibility andsensitivity of the model. The model provided the research teamthe ability to evaluate the various training alternatives todetermine the most effective and resource efficient schedule fortraining units receiving LHX aircraft and units receivingaircraft that is to be displaced by the LHX.

When evaluating the proposed unit training schedulealternatives, it was determined that Alternative 1 in which allunit training is accomplished at home stations with individualand crew (Phase I) and gunnery (Phase III) training beingconducted during AQC was the best alternative. In this case theaverage unit training time is 17.6 weeks and training for allunits is completed by week 53 in the year 2000. Additionally,any of the alternatives consolidating training at a singleloLation require increased garrison and support resources.

Appendix C contains the training schedule under thisalternative for each year 12 of the entire fielding plan.Throughout the ten year cycle, the average unit training timefor active LHX units is 17.57 weeks, and the average unittraining time for ARNG LHX units is 89 weeks.

According to the LHX Distribution Plan, ARNG units begin toreceive LHX aircraft at week 18 of year 2002. When examiningFigure 32, it can be seen that ARNG units begin training at week16 of that year. Since ARNG personnel are only authorized twoweeks of ADT per year, only a two week portion of AQC13 will beperformed at a central training center. The remainder wi'C beaccomplished at home station at the rate of 2 drill periods perweek. Company training and all battalion level training save oneweek are also accomplished at home station but at a rate of twodrill periods per month. The last week of battalion leveltraining is accomplished during the next ADT phase.

Resource rates of consumption are based upon the trainingdescribed above. The resources required are the same as theresources required to train active duty units but are consumeddifferently due to the lack of ADT available to conduct unit

12For active Army units only; ending in FY 2002. There isone training schedule for ARNG units which begins in FY 2002 andcontinues through January 2005.


44

-t 02 AI, .4 02 2A

S02 3A-F- - 02 4R

S,02 S- 6 -26

-- 6 -27] .( ) gg .02 BU0

- - - R

-L 02 R - .. 6 M-3Ua- - 2-3

-- - 2-3-- )2-3

MWO - A6 A

r-1- 60 117 - - 60 1

I If 60

w R 03 5R-- 03 6R

- 60

03A

4 C 60 11R- r 1 60 12R

- - at on -3U. r R -I" 03-14A

-- -I 03-15A

If OT II GA

- -03-1 R

* 10 20 30 40 50060 70 0110120130 0150160 70

Figure 32. Training schedule for ARNG units beginning in FY

2002.

45

training. In this case resources are allocated where they are incompetition with the total force structure. Thus AQC isscheduled to begin three weeks prior to the availability ofdelivered aircraft because the aircraft are required to conductthe home station portion of AQC.

Develoment of a Trainina Schedule Model

The model developed was successfully applied to the LHXacquisition program. The successful application to differentportions of the training system assure the applicability of themethod to the entire training system. The model developed isflexible to provide for the incorporation of new trainingrequirements or additional resources, and can measure theconsumption of resources or the optimum productivity from agiven set of resources. Additionally, actual cost data can beincorporated into the model to determine the cost of training interms dollars as well as average unit training time lost andresource consumption.

The research team has concluded that further investigationand development of the method is warranted. The methods may beexpanded to include application to other aspects of trainingsystems such as course scheduling, and response distribution.

46

References

U.S. Army. (1986). Draft LHX distribution plan (U).Washington, DC. CONFIDENTIAL.

U.S. Army Aviation Center. (1985). Light heliconter family(LHX) draft reauired operational capability (ROC) (U) (Vol.2). Ft. Rucker, AL. SECRET, NOFORN, WNINTELL.

U.S. Army Aviation Systems Command. (1985). Individual andcollective trainina plan letter report for the lighthelicopter family (LHX). Reston, VA: XMCO Inc.

U.S. Army Aviation Systems Command. (1986). Light helicoptersystem full scale ,Oevelovment. reauest for Droposal DAAJ09-86-R-AO04 (2nd draft). St. Louis, MO.

47

Appendix A

LHX Distribution Plan Input Data

Appendix A presents a consolidation of the input dataextracted from the LHX Distribution Plan. It contains a listingby year of the units scheduled to receive LHX aircraft, theirparent unit, the number and type aircraft they are to receive,and deployment area. All units are identified by code containingthe year of receipt, type aircraft, and sequence of distribution.All deployment areas are referenced by number such as Area 1, 2or 3.

For the purposes of this analysis, a unit is a company-sizedorganization. It is important to note that although all LHX unittraining can be catalogued into one of the five phases, there aresome units that do not undergo training in each of these phases.For example, most of LHX utility units do not perform battalionlevel training. Also there are two TDA (Table of Distributionand Allowances) units scheduled to receive LHX utility aircraftand these organizations only perform individual NET. Theseexceptions are identified with an asterisk.

TABLE A-1

LHX Transition Training Plan Unit Input Data for FY 1996

NUMBERUNIT PARENT AREA TYPE A/C REQUIRED SEQUENCE MISSION

96-IR 96-A Area 3 SCAT 10 S1 RECON96-2R 96-A Area 3 SCAT 10 S2 RECON96-3U 96-3 Area 3 UTILITY 6 U1 UTILITY

TABLE A-2



97-lA 97-A Area 3 SCAT 12 S3 ATTACK97-2A 97-A Area 3 SCAT 11 S4 ATTACK97-3A 97-A Area 3 SCAT 11 55 ATTACK97-4A 97-B Area 4 SCAT 12 S6 ATTACK97-5U 97-B Area 4 UTILITY 17 U2 UTILITY

A-1

TABLE A-3



98-1A 98-A Area 1 SCAT 12 S7 ATTACK98-2A 98-A Area 1 SCAT 11 $8 ATTACK98-3A 98-A Area 1 SCAT 11 S9 ATTACK98-4R 98-B Area 1 SCAT 10 S10 RECON98-5R 98-B Area 1 SCAT 10 S1l RECON98-6U 98-6 Area 1 UTILITY 6 U3 UTILITY98-7A 98-C Area 2 SCAT 12 S12 ATTACK98-8A 98-C Area 2 SCAT 11 S13 ATTACK98-9A 98-C Area 2 SCAT 11 S14 ATTACK98-1OU 98-10 Area 2 UTILITY 6 U4 UTILITY98-1IU 98-11 Area 2 UTILITY 12 U5 UTILITY98-12U 98-12 Area 2 UTILITY 15 U6 UTILITY98-13U 98-13 Area 2 UTILITY 15 U7 UTILITY98-14U 98-14 Area 2 UTILITY 15 U8 UTILITY98-15U 98-15 Area 2 UTILITY 2 U9 UTILITY

A-2

TABLE A-4


NUMBERUY'rT PARENT AREA TYPE A/C REQUIRED SEQUENCE MISSION

99-IR 99-A Area 2 SCAT 10 S15 RECON99-2R 99-A Area 2 SCAT 10 S16 RECON99-3A 99-B Area 2 SCAT 12 S17 ATTACK99-4A 99-B Area 2 SCAT 11 S18 ATTACK99-5A 99-B Area 2 SCAT 11 $19 ATTACK99-6R 99-C Area 2 SCAT 10 S20 RECON99-7R 99-C Area 2 SCAT 10 S21 RECON99-8R 99-C Area 2 SCAT 10 S22 RECON99-9A 99-D Area 2 SCAT 12 S23 ATTACK99-iOA 99-D Area 2 SCAT 11 S24 ATTACK99-11A 99-D Area 2 SCAT 11 S25 ATTACK99-12A 99-E Area 2 SCAT 12 326 ATTACK99-13A 99-E Area 2 SCAT 11 S27 ATTACK99-14A 99-E Area 2 SCAT 11 S28 ATTACK99-15A 99-F Area 2 SCAT 12 S29 ATTACK99-16A 99-F Area 2 SCAT 11 S30 ATTACK99-17A 99-F Area 2 SCAT 11 S31 ATTACK99-18R 99-G Area 2 SCAT 10 S32 RECON99-19R 99-G Area 2 SCAT 10 S33 RECON99-20R 99-G Area 2 SCAT 10 S34 RECON99-21R 99-G Area 2 SCAT 10 S35 RECON99-22M 99-22 Area 2 UTILITY 15 U10 MEDEVAC99-23U 99-23 Area 3 UTILITY 16 U11 UTILITY99-24U 99-24 Area 2 UTILITY 12 U12 UTILITY99-25M 99-25 Area 2 UTILITY 15 U13 MEDEVAC99-26M 99-26 Area 2 UTILITY 15 U14 MEDEVAC99-27M 99-27 Area 2 UTILITY 15 U15 MEDEVAC99-28M 99-28 Area 2 UTILITY 15 U16 MEDEVAC99-29M 99-29 Area 2 UTILITY 15 U17 MEDEVAC

A-3

TABLE A-5



00-1U 00-A Area 2 UTILITY 15 U18 UTILITY00-2U 00-A Area 2 UTILITY 15 U19 UTILITY00-3U 00-A Area 2 UTILITY 15 U20 UTILITY00-4U* 00-B Area 2 UTILITY 1 U21 UTILITY*00-5U* 00-B Area 2 UTILITY 1 U22 UTILITY*00-6U* 00-B Area 2 UTILITY 1 U23 UTILITY*00-7R .00-C Area 2 SCAT 10 S36 RECON00-8R 00-C Area 2 SCAT 10 S37 RECON00-9R 00-C Area 2 SCAT 10 S38 RECON00-10R 00-C Area 2 SCAT 10 S39 RECON00-11A 00-D Area 6 SCAT 12 S40 ATTACK00-12A 00-D Area 6 SCAT 11 S41 ATTACK00-13A 00-D Area 6 SCAT 11 S42 ATTACK00-14R 00-E Area 6 SCAT 10 S43 RECON00-15R 00-E Area 6 SCAT 10 S44 RECON00-16R 00-E Area 6 SCAT 10 S45 RECON00-17U 00-17 Area 6 UTILITY 12 U24 UTILITY00-18U 00-18 Area 6 UTILITY 10 U25 UTILITY00-19U* 00-19 Area 6 UTILITY 1 U26 UTILITY*00-20U* 00-20 Area 6 UTILITY 1 U27 UTILITY*00-21U* 00-21 Area 6 UTILITY 2 U28 UTILITY*00-22M 00-22 Area 6 UTILITY 15 U29 MEDEVAC00-23M 00-23 Area 6 UTILITY 15 U30 MEDEVAC00-24A 00-F Area 3 SCAT 12 S46 ATTACK00-25A 00-F Area 3 SCAT 11 S47 ATTACK00-26A 00-F Area 3 SCAT 11 S48 ATTACK00-27R 00-G Area 3 SCAT 10 S49 RECON00-28R 00-G Area 3 SCAT 10 550 RECON00-29R 00-H Area 4 SCAT 10 S51 RECON00-30R 00-H Area 4 SCAT 10 S52 RECON00-31A 00-H Area 4 SCAT 11 S53 ATTACK00-32A 00-H Area 4 SCAT 11 S54 ATTACK00-33A 00-G Area 4 SCAT 11 S55 ATTACK00-34R 00-I Area 4 SCAT 10 556 RECON00-35R 00-I Area 4 SCAT 10 S57 RECON00-36U 00-36 Area 4 UTILITY 12 U31 UTILITY00-37R 00-j Area 4 SCAT 10 558 RECON00-38R 00-J Area 4 SCAT 10 S59 RECON00-39U 00-39 Area 4 UTILITY 12 U32 UTILITY00-40R 00-K Area 4 SCAT 10 S60 RECON00-41R 00-K Area 4 SCAT 10 S61 RECON

A-4

TABLE A-6



01-IR 01-A Area 4 SCAT 10 S62 RECON01-2R 01-A Area 4 SCAT 10 S63 RECON01-3U 01-3 Area 4 UTILITY 12 U33 UTILITY01-4U 01-B Area 4 UTILITY 15 U34 UTILITY01-5U 01-B Area 4 UTILITY 15 U35 UTILITY01-6U 01-B Area 4 UTILITY 15 U36 UTILITY01-7U* 01-7 Area 4 UTILITY 2 U37 UTILITY*01-BR 01-C Area 4 SCAT 10 S64 RECON01-9R 01-C Area 4 SCAT 10 S65 RECON01-10U 01-10 Area 4 UTILITY 12 U38 UTILITY01-11R 01-D Area 3 SCAT 10 S66 RECON01-12R 01-D Area 3 SCAT 10 S67 RECON01-13U 01-13 Area 3 UTILITY 12 U39 UTILITY01-14A 01-E Area 4 SCAT 11 S68 ATTACK01-15A 01-E Area 4 SCAT 11 S69 ATTACK01-16A 01-E Area 4 SCAT 11 S70 ATTACK01-17R 01-E Area 4 SCAT 10 S71 RECON01-18R 01-E Area 4 SCAT 10 S72 RECON01-19R 01-F Area 4 SCAT 10 S73 RECON01-20R 01-F Area 4 SCAT 10 S74 RECON01-21U 01-21 Area 4 UTILITY 12 U40 UTILITY01-22U 01-22 Area 5 UTILITY 6 U41 UTILITY01-23A 01-G Area 5 SCAT 12 S75 ATTACK01-24A 01-G Area 5 SCAT 11 S76 ATTACK01-25A 01-G Area 5 SCAT 11 S77 ATTACK01-26R 01-H Area 5 SCAT 10 S78 RECON01-27R 01-H Area 5 SCAT 10 S79 RECON01-28A 01-I Area 3 SCAT 11 S80 ATTACK01-29A 01-I Area 3 SCAT 11 S81 ATTACK01-30A 01-I Area 3 SCAT 11 S82 ATTACK01-31R 01-I Area 3 SCAT 10 S83 RECON01-32R 01-I Area 3 SCAT 10 S84 RECON01-33U 01-J Area 4 UTILITY 15 U42 UTILITY01-34U 01-J Area 4 UTILITY 15 U43 UTILITY01-35U 01-J Area 4 UTILITY 15 U44 UTILITY01-36U* 01-36 Area 4 UTILITY 3 U45 UTILITY*01-37U* 01-37 Area 4 UTILITY 10 U46 UTILITY*

A-5

TABLE A-7



02-IR 02-A Area 2 SCAT 10 $85 RECON02-2R 02-A Area 2 SCAT 10 S86 RECON02-3U 02-3 Area 2 UTILITY 12 U47 UTILITY02-4R 02-B Area 3 SCAT 10 S87 RECON02-5R 02-B Area 3 SCAT 10 S88 RECON02-6U 02-6 Area 3 UTILITY 12 U48 UTILITY02-7U 02-C Area 3 UTILITY 15 U49 UTILITY02-8U 02-C Area 3 UTILITY 15 U50 UTILITY02-9U 02-C Area 3 UTILITY 15 U51 UTILITY02-10U* 02-10 Area 3 UTILITY 1 U52 UTILITY*02-11U* 02-11 Area 3 UTILITY 1 U53 UTILITY*02-12U* 02-12 Area 3 UTILITY 1 U54 UTILITY*02-13U* 02-13 Area 3 UTILITY 1 U55 UTILITY*02-14M 02-14 Area 3 UTILITY 15 U56 MEDEVAC02-15M 02-15 Area 3 UTILITY 15 U57 MEDEVAC02-16M 02-16 Area 3 UTILITY 15 U58 MEDEVAC02-17M 02-17 Area 3 UTILITY 15 U59 MEDEVAC02-18M 02-18 Area 3 UTILITY 15 U60 MEDEVAC02-19M 02-19 Area 3 UTILITY 15 U61 MEDEVAC02-20M 02-20 Area 3 UTILITY 15 U62 MEDEVAC02-21M 02-C Area 2 SCAT 11 S89 ATTACK02-22A 02-C Area 2 SCAT 11 $90 ATTACK02-23A 02-C Area 2 SCAT 11 591 ATTACK02-24R 02-C Area 2 SCAT 10 592 RECON02-25R 02-C Area 2 SCAT 10 S93 RECON02-26R 02-D Area 3 SCAT 10 594 RECON02-27R 02-D Area 3 SCAT 10 S95 RECON02-28U 02-28 Area 3 UTILITY 12 U63 UTILITY02-29R 02-E Area 2 SCAT 10 S96 RECON02-30R 02-E Area 2 SCAT 10 S97 RECON02-31U 02-31 Area 2 UTILITY 12 U64 UTILITY02-32A 02-F Area 2 SCAT 12 S98 ATTACK02-33A 02-F Area 2 SCAT 11 S99 ATTACK02-34A 02-F Area 2 SCAT 11 S100 ATTACK02-35A 02-G Area 2 SCAT 12 $101 ATTACK02-36A 02-G Area 2 SCAT 11 S102 ATTACK02-37A 02-G Area 2 SCAT 11 S103 ATTACK

A-6

TABLE A-8



03-IU 03-1 Area 2 UTILITY 6 U65 UTILITY03-2R 03-A Area 2 SCAT 10 S104 RECON03-3R 03-A Area 2 SCAT 10 S105 RECON03-4U 03-4 Area 2 UTILITY 6 U66 UTILITY03-5R 03-B Area 2 SCAT 10 S106 RECON03-6R 03-B Area 2 SCAT 10 S107 RECON03-7U 03-7 Area 2 UTILITY 6 U67 UTILITY03-BA 03-C Area 2 SCAT 12 S108 ATTACK03-9A 03-C Area 2 SCAT 11 S109 ATTACK03-10A 03-C Area 2 SCAT 11 $110 ATTACK03-11R 03-D Area 2 SCAT 10 Sill RECON03-12R 03-D Area 2 SCAT 10 S112 RECON03-13U 03-13 Area 2 UTILITY 6 U68 UTILITY03-14A 03-E Area 2 SCAT 12 S113 ATTACK03-15A 03-E Area 2 SCAT 11 S114 ATTACK03-16A 03-E Area 2 SCAT 11 S114 ATTACK03-17R 03-F Area 2 SCAT 10 S116 RECON03-18R 03-F Area 2 SCAT 10 S117 RECON

A-7

Appendix B

Summary Data

Appendix B presents summary data for the baseline case andeach alternative investigated for FY 2000. It includes thefollowing information for each option.

1. A training schedule before and after deconflictionanalyses.'

2. A table displaying the training start time, completiontime and duration for each unit.

3. Graphs illustrating the critical resourcedistributions.


B-i

BASELINE CASE PRIOR TODECONFLICTION ANALYSES

B-2

TRAINING SCHEDULE

4 IT00 211

ire 1 k .9~U IT00 3110U I

t AIT o 0Us

, NIT O GUA~. NJ TO-7R1

9 ft A NIT 0 -OOR Id, 1A NIl.0 -09ANIT0 -IOR

U4- IT O 1 IA

UTIT 0 12A

U ITO I 3AIII~~ 1I1VIU T0 4I U IT 00

I UN T 00- 0.2U,m u*I 0611' 06"

UN T 00- u02UNUN 00I 0

SUNITUNI 0 0 i€UNIT 0-0-u UNIT 0-324

61111i 00-2A. 0-_2 A0U NIT 00-2A

Iti W -14U 00:2iH UN _0- R o-

UNIT 0 -34RU~ UNIT -3R

"41liT OP 37R_. UNIT U0-T30-02

UNIT NIT ONT0 -3911

UNIT 00 R

1 5 10 15 20 25 30 40 60

B-3

UNIT TRAINING TIMES

Week Week Duration

Unit Start End In Weeks

UNIT 00-OlUB 4 28 24

UNIT 00-02UB 4 28 24

UNIT 00-03UB 4 28 24

UNIT 00-04U* 4 14 10

UNIT 00-05U* 4 14 10

UNIT 00-06U* 4 14 10

UNIT 00-07R -5 19 24

UNIT 00-08R -5 19 24

UNIT 00-09R -5 19 24

UNIT 00-10R -5 19 24

UNIT 00-11A -1 23 24

UNIT 00-12A -1 23 24

UNIT 00-13A -1 23 24

UNIT 00-14R 4 28 24

UNIT 00-15R 4 28 24

UNIT 00-16R 4 28 24

UNIT 00-17U 8 28 20UNIT 00-18U 12 32 20UNIT 00-19U* 12 32 10

UNIT 00-20U* 12 22 10

UNIT 00-21U* 12 22 10

UNIT 00-22M 16 36 20UNIT 00-23M 21 41 20UNIT 00-24A 12 36 24UNIT 00-25A 12 36 24

UNIT 00-26A 12 36 24

UNIT 00-27R 12 36 24UNIT 00-28R 12 36 24UNIT 00-29R 21 45 24UNIT 00-30R 21 45 24

UNIT 00-31A 21 45 24

UNIT 00-32A 21 45 24

UNIT 00-33A 21 45 24UNIT 00-34R 25 49 24UNIT 00-35R 25 49 24

UNIT 00-36U 25 45 20

UNIT 00-37R 29 53 24

UNIT 00-38R 29 53 24UNIT 00-39U 29 49 20UNIT 00-40R 34 58 24UNIT 00-41R 34 58 24

Average unit training time is 21.4 weeks.Time required for 50% of the units to complete training is 33.6weeks.

B-4

TRAINING SCHEDULE REALIGNEDFOR CHRISTMAS HOLIDAYS

U Ire 00 UU 00- U IT 00 03UBUN 00-sueUN @0t- 6ua

UN 00- 7RUN 00-gBmUN 00- 9AUN 00- ORUNI 00-1 AUNW 00-1 A

UNI 00I

8 ~~~I 5 0 1 0 2 0 40 4

NIT -5J

UNIT TRAINING TIMES REALIGNED FOR CHRISTMAS HOLIDAYS

Week Week Duration


UNIT 00-OUB 2 28 26

UNIT 00-02UB 2 28 26

UNIT 00-03UB 2 28 26

UNIT 00-04U* 2 12 10

UNIT 00-05U* 2 12 10

UNIT 00-06U* 2 12 10

UNIT 00-07R -4 22 26

UNIT 00-08R -4 22 26

UNIT 00-09R -4 22 26

UNIT 00-I0R -4 22 26

UNIT 00-11A 0 26 26

UNIT 00-12A 0 26 26

UNIT 00-13A 0 26 26

UNIT 00-14R 2 28 26

UNIT 00-15R 2 28 26

UNIT 00-16R 2 28 26

UNIT 00-17U 14 34 20

UNIT 00-18U 14 34 20

UNIT 00-19U* 14 24 10

UNIT 00-20U* 14 24 10

UNIT 00-21U* 14 24 10

UNIT 00-22M 16 36 20

UNIT 00-23M 21 41 20

UNIT 00-24A 14 38 24UNIT 00-25A 14 38 24

UNIT 00-26A 14 38 24UNIT 00-27R 14 38 24

UNIT 00-28R 14 38 24UNIT 00-29R 21 45 24UNIT 00-30R 21 45 24

UNIT 00-31A 21 45 24UNIT 00-32A 21 45 24

UNIT 00-33A 21 45 24UNIT 00-34R 25 49 24UNIT 00-35R 25 49 24UNIT 00-36U 25 45 20

UNIT 00-37R 29 53 24UNIT 00-38R 29 53 24

UNIT 00-39U 29 49 20UNIT 00-40R 34 58 24

UNIT 00-41R 34 58 24

Average unit training time is 22 weeks.Time required for 50% of the units to complete training is 34.5

weeks.

B-6

CRITICAL RESOURCE DISTRIBUTIONSFOR BASELINE CASE

B-7

AERIAL GUNNERY RANGE.

242220

____ ____ ____ ___ ____ ____ ___ 14

__ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ 12

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 WEEKS

DOOR GUNNERY RANGE

242220is

141210

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40Q 45 50 5 WEEKcS

MANEUVER AR~EA

____ ____ ____ ____ ___16

____ ___ ___ ___ ____ __ ___ __ ____ ___ ___ ___ 14

12

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 WEE&S

B-9

OPFOR

500450

400350300

_____ _____ ____150

100

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 WEEKS

TEM TPAflNER

0 5 10 1S 20 25 30 35 40 45 S0 SSVWEECS

1-10

SCAT FLYING HOURS

,__ ,_I000

900

700

400

,' . 300

_1 200

0 5 to 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 WEEKS

UTILITY FLYING HOURS

...... __1000

900Soo

.... _ 700..... 600

400

__ I , 300

& 10011 Ar -111

0 a 10 15 20 25 Z0 35 40 45 50 55 WEEKS

B-Il

EXTERNAL AIRCRAFT

20____ ___ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ __ is

16

10

20

16'412

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55VWEEKS

B- 12

ADMINI!STRATIVE

20to

16

____ ___ ____ ___ ____ ___ ____ ___ __ 4

12

0 6 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 WEKS

DOW 13M

BASELINE CASEDECONFLICTED

B-14

TRAINING SCHEDULE

4UITO 001U5

1~U I 9 UT002Us41 U IT 00 -,03U$

IO UUKU 00UN! 00 6UI

I r UNIT 00 ?RUN! @0 SRUN! 00 9R

AUN! 00- ORUNI 00-1 AUNI 00-1 AUN! 00-1 A-A 9 !T0 14R

UIT 0015R-- I 00 16R

. .. ... ___ __Ma IT 0' -17U.. ..- _- _- 41 )NIT 0 )-IOU

lu 60-19:16U IT 00 20UU 1T 00 21U

I,_6 ,"T 09 0 4A li-,1,_,1 . ,U 1T0 31f' 2 " M. UN 00-..

.... Ul IT 00 SA

U IT 26A- .UN 00-17R

UN 00-S4 R.Il. __ iUN! 00-2 R

UN!I 00- 'RLVu n UNII 00- 3 A

UNll 00-5 UN!I 00-3 NTA

3..1. __ 1_ hr. ulll 0 -

. 1- -UNIT 0-3

SN12 UT 0 -SSR

--g NI li 0-3R

UNIT 00-41R0 5 10 1 20 26 30 5 40 4 60

B-15

UNIT TRAINING TIMES

Week Week DurationUnit Start End In Weeks

UNIT 00-OlUB 2 28 26UNIT 00-02UB 2 28 26UNIT 00-03UB 2 28 26UNIT 00-04U* 2 12 10UNIT 00-05U* 2 12 10UNIT 00-06U* 2 12 10UNIT 00-07R -6 22 28UNIT 00-08R -6 22 28UNIT 00-09R -6 22 28UNIT 00-10R -6 22 28

UNIT 00-I1A 0 26 26UNIT 00-12A 0 26 26UNIT 00-13A 0 26 26UNIT 00-14R 2 28 26UNIT 00-15R 2 28 26UNIT 00-16R 2 28 26UNIT 00-17U 14 34 20UNIT 00-18U 14 34 20UNIT 00-19U* 18 28 10UNIT 00-20U* 18 28 10UNIT 00-21U* 18 28 10UNIT 00-22M 18 38 20UNIT 00-23N 22 42 20UNIT 00-24A 14 38 24UNIT 00-25A 14 38 24

UNIT 00-26A 14 38 24

UNIT 00-27R 18 42 24

UNIT 00-28R 18 42 24

UNIT 00-29R 22 46 24

UNIT 00-30R 22 46 24

UNIT 00-31A 22 46 24

UNIT 00-32A 22 46 24

UNIT 00-33A 22 46 24

UNIT 00-34R 26 50 24

UNIT 00-35R 26 50 24

UNIT 00-36U 26 46 20UNIT 00-37R 30 54 24

UNIT 00-38R 30 54 24

UNIT 00-39U 30 50 20

UNIT 00-40R 34 58 24

UNIT 00-41R 34 58 24


B-16

CRITICAL RESOURCE DISTRIBUTIONSFOR BASELINE CASE (DECONFLICTED)

B-17

*AEIM 1 GUNNERIZ RAN-GE

242220

____ ___ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ __ Is

16

.4

124ATTN II 171,1L22

IIIIII ON20IIIIII I IIN ,O.L

24

B-i20

M!A11EUVER AREA

242220Is1614

- l 12I A 10

N fill\4 11 11\JAI I i x6

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 WEECS

B-19

OPPOR

400350300

_____ _____ ____250

-200

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55SWEEKS

TEAM TR~AINER

__ __ _ __ _ __ _ 2__ _ 4

004? 2

0 S lb 15 20 2S 30 35 40 45 50 5 WEEKS

B- 20

SCAT FLYING POURS

•000

900

700

. . .. 600~Soo

400

I I . III ll - 3001 I I I 1IIII -Of 11 , 11I 1I-I, - -, - oo200

II l I L I l I I I I I IIl I l i a I100a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 VEEKS


1000

900... . 500

,700

600, , 500

300

eX, a 200" ,,t _ i .I- _. - ' - .. . _ .o

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 WEEKS

B-21

EXTERNAL AIRCRAFT

20

1210

2

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 _0 55 WEEKS

EXTER! AL TOE EQUIPA4EIT

1210

k~4

0 S 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 WEEKS

B-22

ADMINISTRATIE

20

tS16141210

o 5 to 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 WEEKS

DOWZNTIYME

27

18I fo Ir~~f~fwu35

-12

o 1 0 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55WEEKS

B-23

TRAINING ALTERNATIVE 1PRIOR TO DECONFLICTION ANALYSES

B-24

TRAINING SCHEDULE

ITO*O 111V IT 00 02U15

a .-. IT 00 03UB

UNI 00- sue

A__ NIT 4ThR-~ _NIT -OSR

- _ NIT -09R-

NIT -IOR' ' ._..1. iTO0 hA

'- IT "A I A11 00-12AIT 0 13A9 a A 1T 00 14R

I I ' ITO0 ISRIt ~i V" 1 . I O 6Ri i - ITOO tSI 1k; N 0 -IU

Nt -191

I. NIT -201UNIT -211U

-,UNI00-2I IILUN) 00-2

Si U 'T 02. MIt 4 IT 00 24A

TI 411 ITCO 25AIT 00- 26A

U ITO. 27RI " h AIT ITO. 28R

Iw - UNIT 0-29-

UNIT 0-30-

UNIT 0-31' UNIT 0-32

- , UNIT 0-33-A NIT -34R

A NIT _35RSUNT 0-36

A' U 17O37RI .. , 1003

I - -- l IT 00 40R

#UNIT 00-41R

* 5 tO is 20 25 30 5 40 45 50 55 60

B-25

UNIT TRAINING TIMES


UNIT 00-OUB 2 23 21

UNIT 00-02UB 2 23 21UNIT 00-03UB 2 23 21UNIT 00-04U* 2 12 10UNIT 00-05U* 2 12 10UNIT 00-06U* 2 12 10UNIT 00-07R -2 19 21UNIT 00-OR -2 19 21UNIT 00-09R -2 19 21UNIT 00-10R -2 19 21UNIT 00-11A 2 23 21UNIT 00-12A 2 23 21UNIT 00-13A 2 23 21UNIT 00-14R 14 33 19UNIT 00-15R 14 33 19UNIT 00-16R 14 33 19UNIT 00-17U 14 29 15UNIT 00-18U 14 29 15UNIT 00-19U* 14 24 10UNIT 00-20U* 14 24 10

UNIT 00-21U* 14 24 10UNIT 00-22M 16 31 15UNIT 00-23M 21 36 15UNIT 00-24A 14 33 19UNIT 00-25A 14 33 19UNIT 00-26A 14 33 19UNIT 00-27R 14 33 19UNIT 00-28R 14 33 19UNIT 00-29R 21 40 19UNIT 00-30R 21 40 19UNIT 00-31A 21 40 19UNIT 00-32A 21 40 19UNIT 00-33A 21 40 19UNIT 00-34R 25 44 19UNIT 00-35R 25 44 19UNIT 00-36U 25 40 15UNIT 00-37R 29 48 19UNIT 00-38R 29 48 19UNIT 00-39U 29 44 15UNIT 00-40R 34 53 19UNIT 00-41R 34 53 19


B-26

CRITICAL RESOURCEDISTRIBUTIONS FOR

TRAINING ALTERNATIVE 1

B-27

AERIALv GUM*E.3Y RhrNGE

2422

_______ 12

If HIM

0 5 10 5 2 253035 0 4 SOUK

DO le, IN!~R 6AG

__ __ __ _ __ __ _ __ __ __ _ __ ___III_ __ _ __f_ 4

22

-12

4

B- 28

.MANIEUVER AREA

24... .... .. . .. .. _ 2 2

20

. . .... .. ... .14

,__ __ ,12_ _ _10

0 5 .10 .'15 20 25 30 5 40 45 60 WEEKS

B-29

OPFOR

450400350300

150IIIIN 1 00

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 WEEKS

TBAM TPUAIVER

0 o1 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 WEEKS

0B- 30

SCAT FLYING HOURS

____ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ _ loco0

900

600

300

0 5 10 ~5 20 25 30 35 40 45 50OWEEKS


___ ___ ___ ___ ___ __ ___ ___ ___ ___ __ ___ ___ ___ ___ __ 1000

900

000

700

Soo

5400

3 00

200KMML A!Mk100

0 5 ..10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50OWEKS

B-31

EXTERNCAL Al IRMPT

20- Is

A 14

12

4

* 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 60OWEEKS

EXTERIMAL TOE EIUIPuJEtr

20

16

12

10 t 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 60 VEEKS

B-32

AMNSTRATWE

20

16

14

12

r 27

-Xj_____._______ 12

* T 1 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50OWEEKS

~- 30

TRAINING ALTERNATIVE 1DECONFLICTED

B- 34

TRAININ4G SCHEDULE

lIT 0 OlSBUITO0 @2UB

TO 411

U 00- 611Sr- NIT -07R

wr NIT ORwr NIT -IOR

-N A N IT -00K 11'A T 00i2A

ITO 001AII ITS00 14R

Ii1q ITO00 ISR

IT00 IOU*IT00 20UG

0 211IT N0 00-U3

IT O 5

- - ITO 6--II q UNI 3

of- - UNI @-- r @@-aN

-UNIT @0-3 A

UNIT 0-34

0 ~~ ~ ~ II _10 101U02 0 54 5S 5*

B-35

UNIT TRAINING TIMES


UNIT 00-O1UB 2 23 21UNIT 00-02UB 2 23 21UNIT 00-03UB 2 23 21UNIT 00-04U* 2 12 10UNIT 00-05U* 2 12 10UNIT 00-06U* 2 12 10UNIT 00-07R -2 19 21UNIT 00-08R -2 19 21UNIT 00-09R -2 19 21UNIT 00-10R -2 19 21UNIT 00-I1A 2 23 21UNIT 00-12A 2 23 21UNIT 00-13A 2 23 21UNIT 00-14R 14 33 19UNIT O0-15R 14 33 19UNIT 00-16R 14 33 19UNIT 00-17U 14 29 15UNIT 00-18U 14 29 15UNIT 00-19U* 18 28 10UNIT 00-20U* 18 28 10UNIT 00-21U* 18 28 10UNIT 00-22M 18 33 15UNIT 00-23M 22 37 15UNIT 00-24A 14 33 19UNIT 00-25A 14 33 19UNIT 00-26A 14 33 19UNIT 00-27R 18 37 19UNIT 00-28R 18 37 19UNIT 00-29R 22 41 19UNIT 00-30R 22 41 19UNIT 00-31A 22 41 19UNIT 00-32A 22 41 19UNIT 00-33A 22 41 19UNIT 00-34R 26 45 19UNIT 00-ZSR 26 45 19UNIT 00-36U 26 41 15UNIT 00-37R 30 49 19UNIT 00-38R 30 49 19UNIT 00-39U 30 45 15UNIT 00-40R 34 53 19UNIT 00-41R 34 53 19


B-36

CRITICAL RESOURCE DISTRIBUTIONSFOR TRAINING ALTERNATIVE 1

(DECONFLICTED)

B-3 7

AERIAL GLMh!NERY RANGE

242220

141210

2

* 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0 WEEKS

DOOR GtIhWERY RANCE

2422

___________________________________2@____ ___ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ __ is

____ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ _ I

14

12

3-38

!VArEUVER AREA

242220is

1412to

IIN 6

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50OWEEKS

B- 39

OPFOR

Soo45,40035,

200ISO

is 5 0 5 20 2 30 35 40 4560 WOEEKS

TEAM TRAINER

0 1 5 20 25 30 35 40 4 6 EK

B-40

SCAT FLYING HOURS

600

4,,

200

0 0I 15 20 25 30 35 40 5 50 WEEKS


3.,.

'800

7.,

200

a 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50OVEEKS

EXTERNAL AIRCRAFT

20

12to

a6

42

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 60 WEEKS

EXTERNAL TOE EQUIPMENT

20IS

___ __ __ __ __ ___ __ __ __ __ __ ___ __ __ _.__ U1412

M Ix to

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 -45 50OVEEKS

B-42

ADMINISTRAtIVE

20

Is16

- 12

10

10 15t 20 25 30 3S 40 45 50OVEECS

DOWNTIME

3,27

2s21

32

* 5 10 15 20 25 30 3 40 45 50VEEKS

B-43

TRAINING ALTERNATIVE 2PRIOR TO DECONFLICTION ANALYSES

B- 44

TRAINING SCHEDULE

IT O -01I -l I 'V ITO -021 %-- I 'AV IT -03

U @b4ddUN 00 sueUN 00 WU

UNIT -0UNIT -0

UNIT -0UNIT -A2 -ITO -111AI~' -- 2- '- IT 0q -12A

1 ~ ~ ' "-- NIT 0q -13DA

ITO -- 4R1 "- -"-- "l IT O0 -15R

' IT 0q -16R"- A7 ITO q-I?U

-0 IT O ISU1 0-IOU,

IT O -20U'IT 0 -21U

UN TO- 2f111- UN S0-13n

U 5O0 24A- - AU ITO0 2SA

- "" U IT O 2GAU tT O 27R

- UITO002SR

- UNII 00- It- - UNI 00-3 A

- UNI 00- A

SUNIT -- ___ UNIT -3

- ~ Uk 00-UITO -3711ITO- ----

~ ITO -40Kt:j 2U I 00-41I

* 5 10 15 20 25 30 | 40 so 60

B-45

UNIT TRAINING TIMES


UNIT 00-OlUB 3 24 21UNIT 00-02UB 3 24 21UNIT 00-03UB 3 24 21UNIT 00-04U* 2 12 10UNIT 00-04U* 2 12 10UNIT 00-06U* 2 12 10UNIT 00-07R -1 20 21UNIT 00-OR -1 20 21UNIT 00-09R -1 20 21UNIT 00-10R -1 20 21UNIT 00-11A 3 24 21UNIT 00-12A 3 24 21UNIT 00-13A 3 24 21UNIT 00-14R 3 24 21UNIT 00-15R 3 24 21UNIT 00-16R 3 24 21UNIT 00-17U 14 29 15UNIT 00-18U 14 29 15UNIT 00-19U* 14 24 10UNIT 00-20U* 14 24 10UNIT 00-21U* 14 24 10UNIT 00-22M 17 32 15UNIT 00-23M 22 37 15UNIT 00-24A 14 33 19UNIT 00-25A 14 33 19UNIT 00-26A 14 33 19UNIT 00-27R 14 33 19UNIT 00-28R 14 33 19UNIT 00-29R 22 41 19UNIT 00-30R 22 41 19UNIT 00-31A 22 41 19UNIT 00-32A 22 41 19UNIT 00-33A 22 41 19UNIT 00-34R 26 45 19UNIT 00-35R 26 45 19UNIT 00-36U 26 41 15UNIT 00-37R 30 49 19UNIT 00-38R 30 49 19UNIT 00-39U 30 45 15UNIT 00-40R 35 54 19UNIT 00-41R 35 54 19


B-46

CRITICAL RESOURCEDISTRIBUTION FOR


B-47

AERIAL GUNNERY RANGE

2422

'4

1 0 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50OVEEKS

DOOR GUNNERY RANGE

242220

____ ___ ____ ___ ____ ___ ____ ___ ____ ___ ____ _ Is

161412

0 5 So 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 VEUS

B-48

MANEUVER AR~EA

2422

________________________________________20

____ ____ ____10

42

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 -45 50 WCKS

B- 49

OPFOR

S00450400

____ ____ ____ ___350

____ ___ ____ ___300

A ________ 250

__ _ __ _ __ _ I___TV__ 200

_____ _____ __IS5

"I I A 1 N 10Im I ISO

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 SOVWEEKS

TEAM TRAINER

S 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50OWEEKS

B-SO

SCAT FLYING HOURS

___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ __ goo,

9,,

100

0 5 10 15 20 2S 30 3S 40 4S50 WOEEKS


___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ 160

goo

.,

200

0 a 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45, SOVWEE&$

3-51

EXTERNAL AIRCRAFT

t24

2220

1614II1I I II 12

lli 110

4

I I Trl 2

22

I \* 5 0 15 20 2 50 5 40 45 SV20

I-'14f t, '. _ I12J 1 1 I I I I X

- i-til

I* I s 20 25 30 3s 40 s5 so.,. s

B-52

ADMINISTRATIV

20

is16

14

2

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 5 40 45 50OEEKS

8-30

TRAINING ALTERNATIVE 2DECONFLICTED

B-54

TRAINING SCHEDULE

R A2 NITO0 -01NITO0 -02

12W NIT 0 -03Ut1O 4UNI 00 5UGUNI 00 6UO

ffUNIT 0-0UNIT 0-08UNIT 0-09UNIT 0-1

NIT -2MITO0 -12ANIT -1 1R A2U IT00 14R

I IC Ift'AVU I 0015Rr % U IT00 16R

ir A2 I10-7UNI TO I-IOU

NITO0 -2011UNITO0 -21U4

Y UN 00-1 3hlR- UN1T00 24A

% U IT00 25A-At WU IT00 26A

uI0027RU IT 00 8R

- .t. U N 00-OR- - *~... U N 00-, A

SU N 00_2A-UN00 A

UN 00 4g R.

UNI 0O-4R

0~~~~i o:015 2 2 035 4

3-55I

UNIT TRAINING TIMES

Week Week Duration



UNIT 00-02UB 3 24 21

UNIT 00-03UB 3 24 21

UNIT 00-04U* 2 12 10UNIT 00-05U* 2 12 10

UNIT 00-06U* 2 12 10

UNIT 00-07R -1 20 21UNIT 00-OR -1 20 21UNIT 00-09R -1 20 21

UNIT 00-I0R -1 20 21

UNIT 00-11A 3 24 21

UNIT 00-12A 3 24 21

UNIT 00-13A 3 24 21UNIT 00-14R 14 33 19

UNIT 00-15R 14 33 19

UNIT 00-16R 14 33 19

UNIT 00-17U 14 29 15

UNIT 00-18U 14 29 15

UNIT 00-19U* 14 24 10UNIT 00-20U* 14 24 10

UNIT 00-21U* 14 24 10

UNIT 00-22M 17 32 15

UNIT 00-23M 22 37 15UNIT 00-24A 14 33 19

UNIT 00-25A 14 33 19UNIT 00-26A 14 33 19

UNIT 00-27R 14 33 19UNIT 00-28R 14 33 19

UNIT 00-29R 23 42 19UNIT 00-30R 23 42 19UNIT 00-31A 23 42 19UNIT 00-32A 23 42 19UNIT 00-33A 23 42 19UNIT 00-34R 28 47 19UNIT 00-35R 28 47 19UNIT 00-36U 26 41 15UNIT 00-37R 32 51 19UNIT 00-38R 32 51 19UNIT 00-39U 30 45 15UNIT 00-40R 37 56 19UNIT 00-41R 37 56 19


B-56

CRITICAL RESOURCE DISTRIBUTION FORTRAINING ALTERNATIVE 2

(DECONFLICTED)

B-57

AERIAL GUNNERY RANGE

2422

,, to

,,16__ __ __ _ __ ___ __ __ __ __"__ __-__ _ 14

22 J1

0 15 I0 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 60 55 WEEKS

DOOR GUNNERY RAN.GE

,2

20

,__16.... 14

'4

* 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 4 50 55VEEKS

B-58

MANEUVER AREA

242220

____ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ is

____ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ _ I____ ___ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ 14

____ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ 12__ __ __ __ __ __ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ 1

* S 10 15 20 25 30 55 40 -. 5 SO WIEEKS

B- 59

OPFOR

So045040035030,

___ ___ ___ __250

200

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 4 50 65 EEKS

TEAM TRAINER

4

0 0I Is 20 25 30 Xs 40 4 s0 55 WEEKS

B-60

SCAT FLYING HOURS

700

5600

400

* 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 4 50 55VWEEKS


1000goo

7.,

Soo

4,.3,.200

kA 100

* 5 IC 15 20 25 30 35 40 4 50 65VLLZS

B- 61

EXTERNAL AIRCRAFT

24

22

IN 11 14

44l ILI

-4 k"il - 20

0 6 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 ,5 50 55 WEEKS

EXTERNAL TOE E0OUIPM ENT

242

* 5 10 1 2 25 3 35 0 4N 0 VE

14fill Lit12

''I I . .. 111...4 1111 .. ........

1 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 VEKS

B-62

ADMINISTRATIVE

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 4 50 55 WECS

DOWNTIME

s027

1

0 5 10 IS 20 25 S0 35 40 4 50 5VEECS

B-63


B-64

TIkING 59]D ULE

IT S t."4 AIT * 02

IT & 0316* 43

UN so sue

ML IT -473- NIT -UR

- NIT -,OR-. ~M IT -153

ITO 1A

"4 IT@9 13A

- ITS 151t

It i IT .- IOU1 IT 00 55U

IT00 20URITO 2111%

-u -T OOJ22fl

- -,-,0--3 r

_: OAII3

WE IT i 149 kk ITO IA

- -~~UN ?SaT- UN 00-SR

to 1 UNII 00-2 ItIt I UNIT 004 Rt

91 1 UNIT 00-3AI UNI 004 A

UNII 04 A~ -UNIIT 0-34

-UNIT -35-s UN 4 U

to- NIT 43739w IT 0040-- --1 IT ,-35,

__._ UNIT 00-4115 0 1l tO 25 30 1 40 li5 5 S O

B-65

UNIT TRAINING TIMES


UNIT 00-OUB 2 23 21UNIT 00-02UB 2 23 21UNIT 00-03UB 2 23 21UNIT 00-04U* 2 12 10UNIT 00-05U* 2 12 10UNIT 00-06U* 2 12 10UNIT 00-07R -2 19 21UNIT 00-08R -2 19 21UNIT 00-09R -2 19 21UNIT 00-10R -2 19 21UNIT 00-11A 2 23 21UNIT 00-12A 2 23 21UNIT 00-13A 2 23 21UNIT 00-14R 14 33 19UNIT 00-15R 14 33 19UNIT 00-16R 14 33 19UNIT 00-17U 14 29 15UNIT 00-18U 14 29 15UNIT 00-19U* 18 28 10UNIT 00-20U* 18 28 10UNIT 00-21U* 18 28 10UNIT 00-22M 18 33 15UNIT 00-23M 22 37 15UNIT 00-24A 14 33 19UNIT 00-25A 14 33 19UNIT 00-26A 14 33 19UNIT 00-27R 18 37 19UNIT 00-28R 18 37 19UNIT 00-29R 22 41 19UNIT 00-30R 22 41 19UNIT 00-31A 22 41 19UNIT 00-32A 22 41 19UNIT 00-33A 22 41 19UNIT 00-34R 26 45 19UNIT 00-35R 26 45 19UNIT 00-36U 26 41 15UNIT 00-37R 30 49 19UNIT 00-38R 30 49 19UNIT 00-39U 30 45 15UNIT 00-40R 34 53 19UNIT 00-41R 34 53 19

Average unit training time is 17.6 weeks.Time required for 50% of the units to complete training is 32.2 weeks.

B-66

AERIAL GMTNERY RANGE

242220is16'412

2

is 0 5 2 25 30 35 40 4 6 WEEKS

DOOR GUNNE,'RY RANGE

2422

-20

16141210

0 5 t0 I5 20 M 2 30 35 40 45 50OWEEKS

s-67

1AMEUVER ARZEA

242220is16141210

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 SoVWEEKS

450400

300

250200

* 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 4 50WEEKS

TEAM TRAINER

it

B-69

SCAT FLYING HOURS

'600

Soo

400

T, 100

,, - 9,,

III./ ll i I IIIIi 11'1 III,_.o

0 t 1o 15 20 2S Be 40 46 SO VEEKS


..... 0

7.0

, 300

*S

, , 200

1001 M11 . .M Ii I I I 100..

a 10 IS 20 26 30 35 40 4 50 VEEKS

B-70

EXTERNAL AIRCRAFT

14

UH14

to 1 15 20 25 30 15 40 45 50OWEEKS

EXTERNAL TOE EQUIPM ENT~

14AM - 12

3--to

ADM4INISTRATIVE

to

12

2.710

0 5 to is 20 25 30 35 40 65 50WEEKS

DOWNTIME

30

1

5 10 Of 20 25 30 35 *0 65 6 WEEKS

B-72

Appendix C

Alternative 1 Training Schedules

Appendix C contains training schedules for the selectedAlternative 1 for each year1 of LHX fielding. Included with eachtraining schedule are tables of unit training times and resourceloading summaries.


1For active Army units only; ending in FY 2002. There isone training schedule for ARNG units which begins in FY 2002 andcontinues through January 2005.

C-1

RESOURCES REQUIRED FOR FY 1995

Resource Maximum Total

MANEUVER AREA 0 0CLASS/BRIEF RMS 2 8

AIR/STAGE FIELDS 1 4GARRISON FAC 1 4

AERIAL GUN RG 1 4DOOR GUN RANGE 1 4

ARTY GUN RANGE 1 4

OPFOR 0 0

FRIENDLY FORCES 0 0EVALUATORS 0 0INT SCAT TNG SYST 0 0INT UTIL TNG SYST 1 4MILES/AGES 0 0DUMMY HELLFIRE 0 0DUMMY STINGER 1 4

ATGM SYSTEM 0 0

TEAM TRAINER 0 0ASET I 0 0RCMAT 0 0

FLYING HRS SCAT 0 0FLYING HRS UTIL 0 0EXTERNAL ACFT 1 4EXTERNAL TOE EQ 1 4MAINTENANCE 1 4SUPPLY CLASS IX 1 4SUPPLY CLASS V 1 4SUPPLY CLASS VII 1 4ADMIN 1 1DOWNTIME 1 5

* Resources consumed in 1995 are due to a hypothetical NET start

in that year.

C-2

TRAINING SCHEDULE FOR FY 1996

Xr ~ UNIT I6-01R

7c R UNIT 6-02R

jILA UNIT 16-03U

0 5 to 15 20 25 .30 35 40 45 s0 55

C- 3

UNIT TRAINING TIMES FOR FY 1996


UNIT 96-01R 16 35 19UNIT 96-02R 16 35 19UNIT 96-03U -5 10 15


C-4



MANEUVER AREA 2 23

CLASS/BRIEF RMS 4 78

AIR/STAGE FIELDS 2 43

GARRISON FAC 2 20AERIAL GUN RG 2 20DOOR GUN RANGE 1 4ARTY GUN RANGE 1 5OPFOR 54 405FRIENDLY FORCES 54 405EVALUATORS 2 3INT SCAT TNG SYST 6 50INT UTIL TNG SYST 1 9MILES/AGES 18 135DUMMY HELLFIRE 2 16DUMMY STINGER 2 20ATGM SYSTEM .6 5.4TEAM TRAINER .6 6.9ASET I 0 0RCMAT 1 5FLYING HRS SCAT 110 990FLYING HRS UTIL 55 275EXTERNAL ACFT 2 20EXTERNAL TOE EQ 2 20MAINTENANCE 2 20SUPPLY CLASS IX 2 20SUPPLY CLASS V 2 20SUPPLY CLASS VII 2 20

ADMIN 2 5DOWNTIME 2 48

C-5

TRAIN~ING SCHEDULE FOR Py 2997

I1~ -UNIT I7-01A

UNIT I7-02A

IN r A UNIT I7-03A

IN I si rA iNIT 9 -04A

0 to 15 20 25 50 55 40 45 s0 5

C-6



UNIT 97-01A 16 35 19UNIT 97-02A 16 35 19UNIT 97-03A 16 35 19UNIT 97-04A 25 44 19UNIT 97-05U 14 29 15


C-7



MANEUVER AREA 4 41CLASS/BRIEF RMS 10 178AIR/STAGE FIELDS 5 93GARRISON FAC 4 52AERIAL GUN RG 4 52DOOR GUN RANGE 2 20ARTY GUN RANGE 2 21OPFOR 81 747FRIENDLY FORCES 81 747EVALUATORS 3 5INT SCAT TNG SYST 10 100INT UTIL TNG SYST 2 25MILES/AGES 27 249DUMMY HELLFIRE 3 32DUMMY STINGER 4 52ATGM SYSTEM .9 10.8TEAM TRAINER 1.2 12.3ASET I 0 0RCMAT 1 5FLYING HRS SCAT 165 1980FLYING HRS UTIL 55 275EXTERNAL ACFT 4 52EXTERNAL TOE EQ 4 52MAINTENANCE 4 52SUPPLY CLASS IX 4 52SUPPLY CLASS V 4 52SUPPLY CLASS VII 4 52ADMIN 4 13DOWNTIME 5 101

C-8

TRAININlG SCHEDULE FOR FY 1998

U IT 98 IA

U 1IT, "2A

UWI IT 9-3A

U ITT984411

INWT 9 -09A

0 5 ~ UTO 1 02 0 3 0 4 0 5

NIC9-11l


Week Week DurationUnit Start End In weeks

UNIT 98-01A 2 23 21UNIT 98-02A 2 23 21UNIT 98-03A 2 23 21UNIT 98-04R 14 33 19UNIT 98-05R 14 33 19UNIT 98-06U -10 5 15UNIT 98-07A 25 44 19UNIT 98-08A 25 44 19UNIT 98-09A 25 44 19UNIT 98-10U -5 10 15UNIT 98-11U 2 19 17UNIT 98-12U 14 29 15UNIT 98-13U 16 31 15UNIT 98-14U 25 40 15UNIT 98-15U* 25 35 10


C-10



MANEUVER AREA 4 102CLASS/BRIEF RMS 16 412AIR/STAGE FIELDS 9 230GARRISON FAC 5 128AERIAL GUN RG 5 128DOOR GUN RANGE 2 48ARTY GUN RANGE 3 54OPFOR 108 1746FRIENDLY FORCES 108 1746EVALUATORS 3 14INT SCAT TNG SYST 11 216INT UTIL TNG SYST 4 78MILES/AGES 36 582DUMMY HELLFIRE 3 80DUMMY STINGER 5 128ATGM SYSTEM .9 21.6TEAM TRAINER 1.2 30.6ASET I 0 0RCMAT 2 30FLYING HRS SCAT 165 3960FLYING HRS UTIL 110 1650EXTERNAL ACFT 5 128EXTERNAL TOE EQ 5 128MAINTENANCE 5 128SUPPLY CLASS IX 5 128SUPPLY CLASS V 5 128SUPPLY CLASS VII 5 128ADMIN 6 32DOWNTIME 9 260

C-11

TRAINIhG SCHEDULE FOR FY 1999

I INIT -OSA INIT "02R

, II.u I , -A U I 99- 0 AIn U IT 99 04!gg A

, ,., IT 99 A

M -,itU T,99 A-

10 u U IT 99 ,

gm I y AU I99 1R. rt 99- 0

r I-f uAUT99- 1OA

I UIT 9 I , A9

- 1 _ .1R._ 9-I A IT 99 -17A1 111M umiC... r 9 UN- 19-2At~~JL I~.. I UNIT 99--AIAr 9- 3

I9I I UNIT 99-15A

-PI UNIT 99-16A- UNIT 99-17A

1 31 L.. - - UNIT 99-1 ORPr IR A UNIT 99-1-9RM

.. -,-IUNIT 99-20R

T , UNIT 9-2 NI -2 B U 99 2 -MIT -23U

-i !T4 99-24Ui~L

UN 99-2 i2,0UNIT 9 -29

0 5 t0 15 20 25 30 5 40 45 50 55

C-12



UNIT 99-O1R -10 9 19UNIT 99-02R -10 9 19UNIT 99-03A 2 23 21UNIT 99-04A 2 23 21UNIT 99-05A 2 23 21UNIT 99-06R 23 21UNIT 99-07R 2 23 21UNIT 99-08R 2 23 21UNIT 99-09A 14 33 19UNIT 99-1OA 14 33 19UNIT 99-IIA 14 33 19UNIT 99-12A 23 42 19UNIT 99-13A 23 42 19UNIT 99-14A 23 42 19UNIT 99-15A 32 51 19UNIT 99-16A 32 51 19UNIT 99-17A 32 51 19UNIT 99-18R 41 60 19UNIT 99-19R 41 60 19UNIT 99-20R 41 60 19UNIT 99-21R 41 60 19NIT 99-22M -5 10 15UNIT 99-23U 2 19 17UNIT 99-24U 2 19 17UNIT 99-25M 14 29 15UNIT 99-26M 14 29 15UNIT 99-27M 16 31 15UNIT 99-28M 21 36 15UNIT 99-29M 25 40 15

Average unit training time is 18.4 weeks.Time required for 50% of the units to complete training is 34weeks.

C-13



MANEUVER AREA 8 197


AIR/STAGE FIELDS 14 413GARRISON FAC 9 216

AERIAL GUN RG 9 216

DOOR GUN RANGE 4 60ARTY GUN RANGE 5 68

OPFOR 216 3447

FRIENDLY FORCES 216 3447EVALUATORS 6 25INT SCAT TNG SYST 21 449INT UTIL TNG SYST 5 100

MILES/AGES 72 1149DUMMY HELLFIRE 6 156DUMMY STINGER 9 216

ATGM SYSTEM 1.8 47.1TEAM TRAINER 2.4 59.1

ASET I 0 0RCMAT 3 40FLYING HRS SCAT 330 8635

FLYING HRS UTIL 165 2200EXTERNAL ACFT 9 216EXTERNAL TOE F, 9 216MAINTENANCE 9 216SUPP14Y CLASS IX 9 216SUPPLY CLASS V 9 216SUPPLY CLASS VII 9 216

ADMIN 8 57DOWNTIME 14 480

C-14

TRAINING SCHEDULE FOR PY 2000

.aT 00 0lu8 i_ I. U IT 00 02U6

.'U IT 00 03U

UI 00-4

- 100- 511-NITOQ -07R

HIN @0 -*OR

NIT 0 -09RSNIT 0-IOR

U ITOO IIA--!A U.T 00 12A

A IT O0 13A'9 dRA4UI 00- 14RFt U4 -_ T 00" I SR

A 1 -- U IT00 16RIt € T0-t7U

I d . IT 00 19U*

___ 1 2 21

___ U I IT0;" IT 00 2 2r

1 1 - A U NI 0 0 - S R

71c, UNI 00-3

Ir- 11R '0 300 24A 0.

U IU N 0-3N- i I0 0

A UN 00-4 NI1-11

4UN N0- T 0R 3

,,, " 00-3UIA

UNT0-34, , .N IT'r .0T-3U

A Nr ,-37R19 W UNr 0 -3

Il R!l1ilT 00140RUNIT 00-41R

*10 IS 20 25 30 5 40 45 50 55 60

C-1S


Week Week Duration



UNIT 00-02UB 2 23 21

UNIT 00-03UB 2 23 21

UNIT 00-04U* 2 12 10UNIT 00-05U* 2 12 10

UNIT 00-06U* 2 12 10

UNIT 00-07R -2 19 21UNIT 00-08R -2 19 21

UNIT 00-09R -2 19 21UNIT 00-10R -2 19 21

UNIT 00-IA 2 23 21UNIT 00-12A 2 23 21UNIT 00-13A 2 23 21

UNIT 00-14R 14 33 19

UNIT 00-15R 14 33 19UNIT 00-16R 14 33 19UNIT 00-17U 14 29 15UNIT 00-18U 14 29 15UNIT 00-19U* 18 28 10UNIT 00-20U* 18 28 10UNIT 00-21U* 18 28 10UNIT 00-22M 18 33 15UNIT 00-23M 22 37 15UNIT 00-24A 14 33 19UNIT 00-25A 14 33 19UNIT 00-26A 14 33 19UNIT 00-27R 18 37 19UNIT 00-28R 18 37 19UNIT 00-29R 22 41 19UNIT 00-30R 22 41 19UNIT 00-31A 22 41 19UNIT 00-32A 22 41 19UNIT 00-33A 22 41 19UNIT 00-34R 26 45 19UNIT 00-35R 26 45 19UNIT 00-36U 26 41 15UNIT 00-37R 30 49 19UNIT 00-38R 30 49 19UNIT 00-39U 30 45 15

UNIT 00-40R 34 53 19UNIT 00-41R 34 53 19


C-16



MANEUVER AREA 15 323



GARRISON FAC 14 350

AERIAL GUN RG 14 350

DOOR GUN RANGE 6 128ARTY GUN RANGE 9 149

OPFOR 297 5985

FRIENDLY FORCES 297 5985EVALUATORS 7 39

INT SCAT TNG SYST 27 728

INT UTIL TNG SYST 9 185

MILES/AGES 99 1995DUMMY HELLFIRE 8 222DUMMY STINGER 14 350

ATGM SYSTEM 3.9 79.8

TEAM TRAINER 4.5 96.9

ASET I 0 0

RCMAT 3 57

FLYING HRS SCAT 715 14630FLYING HRS UTIL 165 3135EXTERNAL ACFT 14 350

EXTERNAL TOE EQ 14 350MAINTENANCE 14 350SUPPLY CLASS IX 14 350

SUPPLY CLASS V 14 350

SUPPLY CLASS VII 14 350

ADMIN 9 87

DOWNTIME 26 766

C-17

TRAINING SCHEDULE FOR FY 2001

• -r -NT I 4

I0 WUITO -I U

111 -0 a0ITO 111I TO t 121i IT 013U

,~ I.- 1@2R

AI- TO 14

- ..jAU TOt isA- ..AU TO 16A

r - ...,AU To 011A, i 'A T O O7R

RAI ITOI 0Rk I 'i -,, T 0 11-

9c INT 0 2U

N A ITO -23A' ITO-24A

_60 25AW , i IT 0 -25A

A 0 2TOI R- i AR

r Vt I MIOI -26Ae- UNIT 01-29A

-I UNIT ol-30A- c - UNIT 01-3IRWe UNIT 0o 1-32

-A TL 01-Ve u 01

UNI 01-30 5 t0 15 26 25 35 40 4 50 55

C-16



UNIT 01-01R -10 9 19UNIT 01-02R -10 9 19UNIT 01-03U -10 5 15UNIT 01-04U 2 23 21UNIT 01-05U 2 23 21UNIT 01-06U 2 23 21UNIT 01-07U* -1 9 10UNIT 01-08R -2 19 21UNIT 01-09R -2 19 21UNIT 01-10U 2 19 17UNIT 01-11R 2 23 21UNIT 01-12R 2 23 21UNIT 01-13U 14 29 15UNIT 01-14A 14 33 19UNIT 01-15A 14 33 19UNIT 01-16A 14 33 19UNIT 01-17R 14 33 19UNIT 01-IR 14 33 19UNIT 01-19R 19 38 19UNIT 01-20R 19 38 19UNIT 01-21U 14 29 15UNIT 01-22U 14 29 15UNIT 01-23A 25 44 19UNIT 01-24A 25 44 19UNIT 01-25A 25 44 19UNIT 01-26R 29 48 19UNIT 01-27R 29 48 19UNIT 01-28A 38 57 19UNIT 01-29A 38 57 19UNIT 01-30A 38 57 19UNIT 01-31R 38 57 19UNIT 01-32R 38 57 19UNIT 01-33U 22 37 15UNIT 01-34U 22 37 15UNIT 01-35U 22 37 15UNIT 01-36U* 21 31 10UNIT 01-37U* 21 31 10


C-19



MANEUVER AREA 10 249



GARRISON FAC 12 300


DOOR GUN RANGE 5 116

ARTY GUN RANGE 8 139

OPFOR 216 4275

FRIENDLY FORCES 216 4275

EVALUATORS 5 29

INT SCAT TNG SYST 22 510

INT UTIL TNG SYST 8 183

MILES/AGES 72 1425

DUMMY HELLFIRE 7 184

DUMMY STINGER 12 300

ATGM SYSTEM 2.1 54.6

TEAM TRAINER 3 74.7

ASET I 0 0

RCMAT 4 67

FLYING HRS SCAT 385 10010

FLYING HRS UTIL 220 3685

EXTERNAL ACFT 12 300

EXTERNAL TOE EQ 12 300

MAINTENANCE 12 300

SUPPLY CLASS IX 12 300

SUPPLY CLASS V 12 300

SUPPLY CLASS VII 12 300

ADMIN 8 74

DOWNTIME 20 620

C-20

TRAINING SCHEDULE FOR ACTIVE UNITS FOR FY 2002

A IT0 -0P

IT 0,'i -02R

UNIT 2-03U'

-NIT 02 -04R

- MIIT0 -05R

J~fL.... L UNIT 2-06U

2(~.~fU It 02 7110

U IT02 12U"

U. IT02 13U

IT 02-1611

~ NI 02 -1

- UNI T 2-I

UNIT 2-19MJUNIT '2-20

0 5 10 15 20 25 50 35 40 45 50 55

C-21

UNIT TRAINING TIMES FOR ACTIVE UNITS FOR FY 2002


UNIT 02-01R -10 9 19UNIT 02-02R -10 9 19UNIT 02-03U -10 5 15UNIT 02-04R -2 19 21UNIT 02-05R -2 19 21UNIT 02-06U -5 10 15UNIT 02-07U 14 33 19UNIT 02-08U 14 33 19UNIT 02-09U 14 33 19UNIT 02-10U* 14 24 10UNIT 02-11U* 18 28 10UNIT 02-12U* 18 28 10UNIT 02-13U* 18 28 10UNIT 02-14M 14 29 15UNIT 02-15M 14 29 15UNIT 02-16M 14 29 15UNIT 02-17M 16 31 15UNIT 02-18M 21 36 15UNIT 02-19M 25 40 15UNIT 02-20M 25 40 15


C-22

RESOURCES REQUIRED FOR ACTIVE UNITS FOR FY 2002


MANEUVER AREA 8 133CLASS/BRIEF RMS 24 430AIR/STAGE FIELDS 13 263

GARRISON FAC 12 130


DOOR GUN RANGE 12 116ARTY GUN RANGE 12 140OPPOR 216 2439FRIENDLY FORCES 216 2439EVALUATORS 6 21INT SCAT TNG SYST 19 147INT UTIL TNG SYST 13 188MILES/AGES 72 813

DUMMY HELLFIRE 2 14

DUMMY STINGER 12 130ATGM SYSTEM 2.1 18.3TEAM TRAINER 2.4 39.9ASET I 0 0RCMAT 7 72FLYING HRS SCAT 385 3355FLYING HRS UTIL 385 3960EXTERNAL ACFT 12 130EXTERNAL TOE EQ 12 130MAINTENANCE 12 130SUPPLY CLASS IX 12 130SUPPLY CLASS V 12 130SUPPLY CLASS VII 12 130ADMIN 7 31DOWNTIME 13 298

C-23

TRAINING SCHEDULE FOR ARNG UNITS BEGINNINGIN FY 2002

02 IAI , ' 11 W2 . 2 A-02 A

@2 3AI I!--- - 04R- 6 -26

"0 6 0 -27 02I ~R 02g S U

C. -2- -R-- ~ -02

2-326 2-3

I1 i -31 UR

b- 2-3

- -- - - 6 - A*6 -A

L ,qa 6 A

-0 I- 60 1

Ra 60+,a ' B [ - G O .O I i

S-" --- ,- + 0-3 5R+ -F - - -0 6R

I R R 10 7

R0 A,i~ 11R0l

-C--~~ Oa -- 12R 3- - - - 03- A

1. -n - 0 - A

03-1R

03-tm010 20 30 40 500 70 V90 %00110 120 130 40 150-160 70

C- 24

UNIT TRAINING TINES FOR ARNG UNITS BEGINNING IN FY 2002


NG 02-21A 16 105 89NG 02-22A 16 105 89NG 02-23A 16 105 89NG 02-24R 16 105 89NG 02-25R 16 105 89NG 02-26R 20 109 89NG 02-27R 20 109 89NG 02-28U 37 126 89NG 02-29R 24 113 89NG 02-30R 24 113 89NG 02-31U 42 131 89NG 02-32A 33 122 89NG 02-33A 33 122 89NG 02-34A 33 122 89NG 02-35A 42 131 89NG 02-36A 42 131 89NG 02-37A 42 131 89NG 03-O1U 50 139 89NG 03-02R 50 139 89NG 03-03R 50 139 89NG 03-04U 50 139 89NG 03-05R 55 144 89NG 03-06R 55 144 89NG 03-07U 50 139 89NG 03-OA 64 153 89NG 03-09A 64 153 89NG 03-10A 64 153 89NG 03-11R 68 157 89NG 03-12R 68 157 89NG 03-13U 55 144 89NG 03-14A 76 165 89NG 03-15A 76 165 89NG 03-16A 76 165 89NG 03-17R 81 170 89NG 03-18R 81 170 89

Average unit training time is 89 weeks.Time required for 50% of the units to complete training is 134.9weeks.

C-25

Light Helicopter Family (LHX) · Light Helicopter Family (LHX) ... policy, or decision, unless so...

Documents

Transcript of Light Helicopter Family (LHX) · Light Helicopter Family (LHX) ... policy, or decision, unless so...