Life History and Skeletal Adaptations in the Galapagos Marine Iguana ( Amblyrhynchus cristatus ) as...
Transcript of Life History and Skeletal Adaptations in the Galapagos Marine Iguana ( Amblyrhynchus cristatus ) as...
![Page 1: Life History and Skeletal Adaptations in the Galapagos Marine Iguana ( Amblyrhynchus cristatus ) as Reconstructed with Bone Histological Data—A Comparative Study of Iguanines](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022080421/5750a4561a28abcf0ca99574/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, researchlibraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research.
Life History and Skeletal Adaptations in the Galapagos Marine Iguana(Amblyrhynchus cristatus) as Reconstructed with Bone Histological Data—AComparative Study of IguaninesAuthor(s): Jasmina Hugi and Marcelo R. Sánchez-VillagraSource: Journal of Herpetology, 46(3):312-324. 2012.Published By: The Society for the Study of Amphibians and ReptilesDOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1670/11-071URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1670/11-071
BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, andenvironmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books publishedby nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses.
Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance ofBioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use.
Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiriesor rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder.
![Page 2: Life History and Skeletal Adaptations in the Galapagos Marine Iguana ( Amblyrhynchus cristatus ) as Reconstructed with Bone Histological Data—A Comparative Study of Iguanines](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022080421/5750a4561a28abcf0ca99574/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Journal of Herpetology, Vol. 46, No. 3, 312–324, 2012Copyright 2012 Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles
Life History and Skeletal Adaptations in the Galapagos Marine Iguana (Amblyrhynchuscristatus) as Reconstructed with Bone Histological Data—A Comparative Study of Iguanines
JASMINA HUGI1
AND MARCELO R. SANCHEZ-VILLAGRA
Palaontologisches Institut und Museum, Universitat Zurich, Karl-Schmid-Strabe 4, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland
ABSTRACT.—The skeletal adaptations of Amblyrhynchus cristatus (Marine Iguanas) are of particular interest based on their amphibiouslifestyle, which is unique among living lacertilian squamates. The well-known ecological data are applied to new bone histological findings,
which revealed expected and unexpected congruencies. The cortical bone matrix consists of avascular lamellar-zonal bone tissue type. The
geometrical disposition of the growth marks (i.e., their spacing) shows an unusual pattern for lizards: the growth cycles maintain a constant
thickness until the growth is terminated, which is marked by the development of the external fundamental system (efs). Minor resorptionprocesses within the inner periosteal cortical region and the occurrence of these thick growth cycles in A. cristatus result in high mean bone
compactness values. The reported life-history data from ecological studies and the hypothesized annuality of the growth cycles indicate that this
first decline in annual bone deposition rate is not congruent with the attainment of sexual maturity. In contrast, this event might be indicated byother histological changes in the growth record of A. cristatus, which they share exclusively with their sister group, Conolophus subcristatus(Land Iguana). The bone matrix of the growth zones and annuli differ in their thickness, their color in polarized light, and vary slightly in the
amount and shape of osteocyte lacunae in both A. cristatus and C. subcristatus. These well-recognizable growth zones and annuli of the growth
cycles change their thickness abruptly within the reported time frame of the attainment of sexual maturity in A. cristatus.
Amblyrhynchus cristatus Bell, 1825 (Reptilia: Iguanidae) aremedium-sized lizards (200–340 mm, adult snout–vent length)distributed on the islands of the Galapagos Archipelago(Boersma, 1983). They show a unique lifestyle among all lizardsby foraging exclusively in the cold sea (Trillmich and Trillmich,1986; Laurie and Brown, 1990). Their habitat and specializeddiet have led to many studies on their physiology with focus onthe thermoregulatory behavior (Bartholomew, 1966; Bennett etal., 1975; Bartholomew et al., 1976; Boersma, 1983), as well as ontheir ecology (Trillmich and Trillmich, 1984; Laurie and Brown,1990; Wikelski and Hau, 1995; Wikelski and Trillmich, 1997).The climate of the Galapagos Archipelago is characterized bytwo seasons, a warm and wet season that lasts from January toJune and a dry and cold season from July to December(Colinvaux, 1972). The seasons are regular except for thereturning El Nino rainfalls in every fourth or fifth year(Colinvaux, 1972). These two distinct seasons favor or decreasethe growth of macrophytic algae, the main food supply of A.cristatus (Laurie and Brown, 1990; Wikelski et al., 1993, 1997),and as a result of this high dependence, reproduction in theMarine Iguana starts during the cold and dry season (Trillmichand Trillmich, 1984).
Is the unique lifestyle of A. cristatus coupled with changes inthe bone microstructure compared to terrestrial iguanidrelatives? Little information exists on the bone histology of A.cristatus, and available data concern only bone compactness ofthe humerus, radius, or the tibia (Germain and Laurin, 2005;Kriloff et al., 2008; Canoville and Laurin, 2010; Houssaye et al.,2010). These studies show that A. cristatus generally have highercompactness values in these limb bones but not in theirvertebrae in comparison to terrestrial squamate relatives. Theterm pachyostosis sensu lato (i.e., hyperplasy of the cortexwhich results in a swollen appearance from external view;Buffrenil and Rage, 1993) has not been observed in any bone ofA. cristatus (Houssaye, 2009).
The long bones of vertebrates are generally informativestructures to study life histories using histological data (e.g.,Castanet et al., 1993). These data can provide information on
rate and duration of growth (Francillon-Vieillot et al., 1990),whereas counting of growth marks (skeletochronology) allowsestimation of the age at sexual maturity and the longevity of anindividual (Castanet et al., 1993). The bone tissue types and thedegree of remodeling processes result in varying compactnessvalues that can be, for example, evaluated with the programBone Profiler (Girondot and Laurin, 2003). An annuallydeposited growth cycle is composed of a growth zone, anannulus, which is occasionally but not always associated with aline of arrested growth (lag) (Castanet et al., 1993). Theannuality of growth units have been supported by studies onrecent reptiles of known age (Castanet and Naulleau, 1985;Castanet et al. 1993; Erickson et al., 2001). Although lags aremost obvious in taxa living in high latitudes/altitudes (areaswith marked seasonality), their occurrence has also beenreported in the bones of taxa living in aseasonal environments(Patnaik and Behera, 1981; Castanet and Gasc, 1986). Castanet etal. (1993) proposed that lags arise as a result of an endogenousbiological rhythm that may be synchronized by external factorssuch as food availability. Such external and internal factors areoften preserved in the histological record by remodelingprocesses (e.g., for the production of eggs), a change in bonetissue type, as well as a decrease in the spacing between the lags(e.g., sexual maturity, termination of growth). The terminationof growth is expressed histologically by the development of anexternal fundamental system (efs after Horner et al., 2001; orOCL: outer circumferential layer after Chinsamy-Turan, 2005).
The aim of this study is to assess the well-known life historyof A. cristatus, in comparison to its terrestrial iguanid relativesusing rare data on the microstructure of limb bones and tocompare them with known life-history data. The questions weaddress here are: (1) whether bone histological data correspondto data on the plasticity of the reproduction cycle, longevity, aswell as the age of sexual maturity (Tables 1, 2), and (2) whetherthe bone histology of A. cristatus is different in comparison to itsterrestrial relatives based on its derived lifestyle. This study (1)describes the bone histology of A. cristatus and (2) applies thewell-known ecological data on the new bone histological datafrom A. cristatus.
1Corresponding Author. E-mail: [email protected]: 10.1670/11-071
![Page 3: Life History and Skeletal Adaptations in the Galapagos Marine Iguana ( Amblyrhynchus cristatus ) as Reconstructed with Bone Histological Data—A Comparative Study of Iguanines](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022080421/5750a4561a28abcf0ca99574/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
TABLE 1. General information about the studied iguanine lizards regarding their home range, the climate they live in, the age of reaching sexualmaturity, the longevity, the adult snout–tail length. Abbreviations: S: summer; sm-t.: age at sexual maturity; svl: snout–vent length; W: winter.
General information
Species Species range Climate Seasons
Amblyrhynchus cristatus Galapagos Archipelago "S’’: warm, rainy; ‘‘W’’: cold,dry
warm season (January–June), dry season(July–December)
Brachylophus fasciatus Fiji Islands S: hot, humid; W: warm, dry S: November–February; W: April–SeptemberConolophus subcristatus Galapagos Archipelago "S’’: warm, rainy; ‘‘W’’: cold,
drywarm season (January–June), dry season
(July–December)Ctenosaura similis Mexico to Panama S: rainy; W: dry S: May–October, W: November–AprilCyclura cornuta Hispaniola (Dominican
Republic)S: hot, rainy; W: warm, dry S: May–October, W: November–April
Dipsosaurus dorsalis SW U.S./NW Mexico S and W: rainfall; arid, hot arid/hot, two rainfall seasonsS: July–September; W: October–March
(hibernation)Iguana iguana Mexico to South
America; West IndiesS: rainfall; W: dry S: May–October, W: November–April
Sauromalus obesus SW U.S./NW Mexico S and W: rainfall; arid andhot
arid/hot, two rainfall seasonsS: July–September; W: October–March,
hibernation
Species sm-t/longevity* SVL [in mm] References
Amblyrhynchus cristatus female: 3–5, male: 6–8/ca. up to 20–30 years
200–340 Etheridge, 1982; Laurie, 1990; Wikelski et al.,1993
Brachylophus fasciatus 2.5 years (ca. 16months)/ca. up to atleast 20 years
185–220 Etheridge, 1982; Iverson, 1982; Gibbons,1984
Conolophus subcristatus female: 7–10, male: 11–16/ca. up to 20–30years
380–490 Etheridge, 1982; Werner, 1983; Christian etal., 1984
Ctenosaura similis 2 years/ca. up to 13years
200–500 Fitch and Henderson, 1977; Etheridge, 1982;Iverson, 1982
Cyclura cornuta female: 12 years, male:? years, in captivity:female: 6–7 years,male: 4–5 years/ca.at least up to 20–30years
-750 Etheridge, 1982; Iverson, 1982; Perez-Buitrago et al., 2008
Dipsosaurus dorsalis 2 years (up to 30months)/ca. up to 14years
100–122 Moberly, 1963; Etheridge, 1982; Iverson,1982; Mautz and Nagy, 1987
Iguana iguana 18–24 months/ca. up to20–30 years
390–450 Etheridge, 1982; Iverson, 1982; Troyer, 1984;Zug and Rand, 1987
Sauromalus obesus females: 2 years, males:2–3 years/ca. up to14 years
175–200 Nagy, 1973; Etheridge, 1982; Abts, 1987
Sampled animals
Species Collection number Sex Lived in . . .
A. c. venustissimus NKMB-30260 Adult male Natural habitat, SLV: 390 mm. Weight: 2570g, male, Espanola (former Hood Island).Capture date: 10 January 1973
A. c. cristatus ZFMK-uncataloged Adult male Natural habitat, FernandinaA. c. cristatus ZFMK-uncataloged Adult female Natural habitat, FernandinaA. c. cristatus ZFMK-uncataloged Subadult male Natural habitat, FernandinaB. fasciatus SMF-72758 Adult male Natural habitatC. subcristatus CAS-10475 Adult male Natural habitat, SLV: 480 mm, male, South
Seymour Islands. Capture date: 21November 1905 by J. R. Slevin
C. similis SMF-52071 Adult male Natural habitatC. cornuta ZFMK-5223 Adult male Natural habitatD. dorsalis SMF-71284 Subadult female Kept in captivityI. iguana NMB-5743 Adult male Kept in captivityS. obesus NMB-13801 Adult female Kept in captivity
BONE HISTOLOGY OF THE GALAPAGOS MARINE IGUANA 313
![Page 4: Life History and Skeletal Adaptations in the Galapagos Marine Iguana ( Amblyrhynchus cristatus ) as Reconstructed with Bone Histological Data—A Comparative Study of Iguanines](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022080421/5750a4561a28abcf0ca99574/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
TA
BL
E2.
Ob
serv
edin
div
idu
alv
aria
tio
no
fco
mp
actn
ess
pro
file
par
amet
erv
alu
esin
the
lim
bel
emen
tsfo
ral
lsa
mp
led
igu
anin
es,
asre
trie
ved
fro
mB
on
eP
rofi
ler
(Gir
on
do
tan
dL
auri
n,
2003
).A
bb
rev
iati
on
s:E
:sk
elet
alel
emen
ts;
Fe:
fem
ur;
Fi:
fib
ula
;H
u:
hu
mer
us;
Max
:re
flec
tsth
eco
mp
actn
ess
inth
eo
ute
rmo
stco
rtex
;M
in:
refl
ects
the
com
pac
tnes
sin
the
cen
tre
of
the
med
ull
a;M#
:m
use
um
nu
mb
er;
O.c
.:o
bse
rved
com
pac
tnes
s;P
:is
the
rela
tiv
ed
ista
nce
toth
ece
ntr
ew
her
eth
em
ost
abru
pt
chan
ge
inco
mp
actn
ess
iso
bse
rved
;S
:u
sual
lyre
flec
tsth
ew
idth
of
the
tran
siti
on
zon
eb
etw
een
the
cort
ical
com
pac
taan
dth
em
edu
llar
yca
vit
y;
Ra:
rad
ius;
R2:
pro
bab
ilit
y(a
fter
Gir
on
do
tan
dL
auri
n,
2003
);S
E:
stan
dar
der
ror;
Ti:
tib
ia;
Ul:
uln
a.
M#
EO
.c.
S(S
E)
P(S
E)
Min
(SE
)M
ax(S
E)
R2
A.
cris
tatu
sN
KM
B30
260
Hu
0.88
40.
0191
065(
0.00
0070
1)0.
3367
103(
0.00
0127
1)6.
8242
71e-
7(1.
6089
39e-
6)0.
9999
99(0
.000
0188
)0.
9989
25R
a0.
901
0.01
4832
7(0.
0000
537)
0.31
1953
5(0.
0000
974)
7.97
2226
e-7(
7.89
3261
e-7)
0.99
9999
(0)
0.99
9363
4U
l0.
921
0.01
8762
6(0.
0001
162)
0.27
7323
6(0.
0002
108)
6.83
9338
e-7(
2.21
4489
e-6)
0.99
9999
(0.0
0001
02)
0.99
9118
6F
e0.
620
0.00
6150
8(0.
0000
258)
0.61
1870
5(4.
1188
91e-
6)3.
4394
19e-
8(0)
0.99
9999
(0)
0.99
9977
2T
i0.
719
0.01
0432
5(0.
0000
459)
0.52
6584
(0)
1.88
1833
e-7(
0)0.
9999
99(0
)0.
9995
769
Fi
0.89
50.
0208
726(
0.00
0129
)0.
3190
775(
0.00
0234
)8.
0428
37e-
7(1.
6743
44e-
6)0.
9999
99(0
)0.
9977
718
Bo
nn
1H
u0.
831
0.02
5759
4(0.
0000
916)
0.41
9416
8(0.
0001
545)
0.06
8401
6(0.
0005
613)
0.99
9999
(8.9
4168
e-6)
0.99
2874
5R
a0.
899
0.01
6939
1(0.
0001
081)
0.31
4294
5(0.
0001
959)
6.82
1047
e-7(
2.38
6869
e-6)
0.99
9999
(0.9
8666
6e-6
)0.
9994
506
Ul
0.90
60.
0182
104(
0.00
0053
9)0.
3026
399(
0.00
0097
7)5.
9426
16e-
7(1.
0706
18e-
6)0.
9999
99(0
)0.
9987
801
Fe
0.65
90.
0093
165(
0.00
0029
)0.
5798
301(
0)6.
1043
30e-
8(3.
5267
14e-
7)0.
9999
99(0
)0.
9998
657
Ti
0.71
20.
0188
555(
0.00
0060
7)0.
5318
063(
0.00
0108
9)3.
2769
14e-
7(6.
1461
09e-
7)0.
9999
99(0
)0.
9985
393
Fi
0.88
60.
0143
07(0
.000
1005
)0.
3335
298(
0.00
0179
6)2.
5672
10e-
7(3.
3866
54e-
6)0.
9999
99(0
)0.
9993
002
Bo
nn
2H
u0.
868
0.03
1681
6(0.
0000
851)
0.35
6075
(0.0
0015
44)
8.04
2837
e-7(
7.27
4741
e-7)
0.99
9999
(5.0
8734
6e-6
)0.
9935
108
Ra
0.91
80.
0124
991(
0.00
0058
6)0.
2819
566(
0.00
01)
8.74
1075
e-7(
2.72
0769
e-6)
0.99
9243
9(0.
0000
205)
0.99
9607
9U
l0.
909
0.01
3373
9(0.
0000
503)
0.29
8513
7(0.
0000
909)
3.26
1969
e-7(
8.22
1851
e-7)
0.99
9495
5(0.
0000
149)
0.99
8905
4F
e0.
702
0.01
8817
6(0.
0000
488)
0.54
1473
8(0.
0000
887)
3.77
7583
e-7(
8.11
5426
e-7)
0.99
9999
(6.1
2793
1e-6
)0.
9996
792
Ti
0.76
60.
0118
327(
0.00
0063
3)0.
4770
131(
0.00
0109
3)3.
3862
07e-
7(7.
2028
42e-
7)0.
9978
603(
0.00
0054
3)0.
9995
943
Fi
0.79
30.
0175
584(
0.00
0048
5)0.
4514
094(
0.00
0094
5)3.
7577
24e-
7(0)
0.99
9999
(0.0
0001
72)
0.99
7723
1B
on
n3
Hu
0.74
40.
0187
148(
0.00
0079
8)0.
5120
425(
0.00
0122
7)0.
0424
399(
0.00
0381
6)0.
9999
99(0
)0.
9955
771
Ra
0.87
50.
0164
652(
0.00
0058
2)0.
3493
796(
0.00
0105
3)2.
6695
99e-
7(2.
0874
40e-
7)0.
9999
99(0
)0.
9978
014
Ul
0.92
70.
0130
47(0
.000
106)
0.26
7937
2(0.
0001
922)
6.74
7306
e-7(
3.05
0201
e-6)
0.99
9999
(0.0
0001
33)
0.99
8844
9F
e0.
628
0.01
3998
7(0.
0000
397)
0.60
5004
4(0.
0000
714)
3.14
2804
e-7(
0)0.
9999
99(0
)0.
9990
93T
i0.
740
0.01
0210
6(0.
0000
516)
0.50
5376
(3.6
3912
5e-6
)1.
0765
26e-
7(5.
6024
2e-7
)0.
9999
99(0
)0.
9997
243
Fi
0.79
30.
0160
29(0
.000
0498
)0.
4511
256(
0.00
0084
3)3.
2645
54e-
7(5.
4914
15e-
7)0.
9999
99(0
)0.
9989
805
B.
fasc
iatu
sS
MF
7275
8H
u0.
826
0.05
7026
(0.0
0016
21)
0.40
1129
4(0.
0002
936)
7.43
4224
e-7(
1.60
4642
e-6)
0.99
9999
(0)
0.96
7110
3R
a0.
728
0.04
6966
3(0.
0000
949)
0.51
1619
(0.0
0017
17)
3.85
4155
e-7(
9.32
6261
e-7)
0.99
9999
(0)
0.99
2838
4U
l0.
757
0.01
9973
9(0.
0000
687)
0.48
8901
2(0.
0001
301)
3.26
0678
e-7(
6.70
1218
e-7)
0.99
9999
(0.0
0001
94)
0.99
9463
4F
e0.
665
0.02
4712
1(0.
0000
746)
0.57
2909
2(0.
0001
353)
3.86
3992
e-7(
7.52
6933
e-7)
0.99
9999
(0)
0.99
3285
3T
i0.
696
0.03
2952
5(0.
0001
054)
0.54
4188
7(0.
0001
922)
1.29
5591
e-7(
0)0.
9999
99(0
)0.
9958
77F
i0.
544
0.02
8718
9(0.
0000
696)
0.66
9282
8(0.
0001
261)
8.54
3985
e-8(
1.67
2502
e-7)
0.99
9999
(4.5
3636
9e-6
)0.
9985
537
C.
sub
cris
tatu
sC
AS
1047
5H
u0.
724
0.02
9801
3(0.
0000
557)
0.51
8991
9(0.
0001
009)
6.83
9338
e-7(
7.12
2264
e-7)
0.99
9999
(4.3
3751
3e-7
)0.
9944
589
Ra
0.70
40.
0294
456(
0.00
0083
9)0.
5370
849(
0.00
0152
)3.
8450
73e-
7(7.
0722
07e-
7)0.
9999
99(3
.895
843e
-6)
0.99
7193
8U
l0.
740
0.03
4505
3(0.
0000
804)
0.50
2522
6(0.
0001
455)
1.03
9551
e-6(
1.36
5153
e-6)
0.99
9873
1(0.
0000
194)
0.99
7272
8F
e0.
605
0.02
7138
3(0.
0000
54)
0.62
1623
8(0.
0000
978)
3.84
3847
e-7(
4.93
2045
e-7)
0.99
9999
(3.5
2436
5e-7
)0.
9974
439
Ti
0.65
20.
0227
959(
0.00
0053
7)0.
5846
224(
0.00
0089
8)2.
0118
49e-
7(6.
5480
85e-
7)0.
9997
472(
0.00
0025
3)0.
9978
07F
i0.
618
0.02
3246
2(0.
0000
686)
0.61
1716
6(0.
0001
244)
4.44
3171
e-7(
7.06
0679
e-7)
0.99
9999
(0)
0.99
9098
C.
sim
ilis
SM
F52
071
Hu
0.63
10.
0213
275(
0.00
0062
)0.
6019
302(
0.00
0112
3)3.
8693
43e-
7(6.
7878
99e-
7)0.
9999
99(0
)0.
9965
733
Ra
0.73
10.
0172
988(
0.00
0056
3)0.
5148
014(
0.00
0102
5)2.
6666
61e-
7(3.
3020
54e-
7)0.
9999
99(6
.617
535e
-6)
0.99
7581
5U
l0.
723
0.01
2490
5(0.
0000
461)
0.52
1544
9(0.
0000
583)
4.44
3730
3–7(
7.64
1211
e-7)
0.99
9999
(0)
0.99
8898
3F
e0.
757
0.01
9978
9(0.
0000
686)
0.48
8902
(0.0
0012
63)
3.27
2789
e-7(
7.27
3960
e-7)
0.99
9999
(0.0
0001
12)
0.99
9463
4T
i0.
570
0.00
8587
2(0.
0000
329)
0.65
1019
9(0)
0.63
9742
0e-8
(3.3
2303
6e-7
)0.
9999
99(0
)0.
9999
144
Fi
0.64
40.
0105
307(
0.00
0061
8)0.
5924
297(
0.00
0215
3)1.
4691
76e-
7(5.
8883
14e-
7)0.
9999
99(0
.000
0123
)0.
9996
374
C.
corn
uta
ZF
MK
5223
Hu
0.61
00.
0102
466(
0.00
0041
)0.
6200
619(
0.00
0044
8)5.
4175
04e-
8(0)
0.99
9999
(0)
0.99
9820
4R
a0.
689
0.01
8855
5(0.
0001
022)
0.55
1283
8(0.
0001
854)
3.27
2377
e-7(
1.32
7413
e-6)
0.99
9999
(0.0
0001
03)
0.99
7805
8U
l0.
679
0.04
1114
3(0.
0001
329)
0.44
3042
1(0.
0002
131)
3.89
9005
e-7(
1.70
9339
e-6)
0.85
3683
2(0.
0003
417)
0.97
2067
1F
e0.
456
0.00
9935
7(0.
0000
448)
0.73
2979
6(0.
0000
842)
4.85
0888
e-8(
0)0.
9999
99(0
.000
0237
)0.
9997
34T
i0.
519
0.01
9803
5(0.
0000
494)
0.68
7968
9(0.
0000
895)
3.78
6513
e-7(
2.85
9956
e-6)
0.99
9999
(7.9
5974
5e-6
)0.
9989
77F
i0.
449
0.01
5085
4(0.
0000
684)
0.70
2917
4(0.
0001
24)
1.10
1373
e-7(
6.66
3236
e-7)
0.99
9999
(0.0
0001
09)
0.99
8568
6
314 J. HUGI AND M. R. SANCHEZ-VILLAGRA
![Page 5: Life History and Skeletal Adaptations in the Galapagos Marine Iguana ( Amblyrhynchus cristatus ) as Reconstructed with Bone Histological Data—A Comparative Study of Iguanines](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022080421/5750a4561a28abcf0ca99574/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The stylo- and zeugopodial bones of the forelimbs (humerus,radius, ulna) and hind limbs (femur, tibia, fibula) of four A.cristatus from two different islands (Amblyrhynchus cristatusvenustissimus Eibl-Eibesfeldt, 1962: NKMB-30260, Espanola;Amblyrhynchus cristatus cristatus Bell, 1825: ZFMK-uncatalogedFernandina, Table 1), as well as specimens of seven terrestrialiguanines, including Conolophus subcristatus (Galapagos LandIguana), were investigated (Fig. 1; Table 1). The museumspecimens used in this study were critical because these lizardsin some cases hold endangered status. Further development ofimaging techniques, which enable the study of skeletochrono-logical data without being invasive, may be used in the future tofurther test the observations we discuss here with ecologicaldata.
Males were preferred as samples because the long bones ofthe females usually serve as calcium storage during reproduc-tion destroying the inner growth record (Buffrenil et al., 2010).Mid-shaft diaphyseal thin sections were prepared and docu-mented following standard petrographic preparation tech-niques (c.f. Scheyer and Sanchez-Villagra, 2007). Bonecompactness profiles and values were quantified (Table 2) usingthe program Bone Profiler 3.20 (Girondot and Laurin, 2003). Thebone histological terminology follows Francillon-Vieillot et al.(1990). Student’s paired t-tests were performed to report theprobability (P) of the following null hypotheses: (1) there is nosignificant difference in the mean compactness values of thelimb bones between the female and the male A. cristatus; (2)there are no significant differences in the mean compactnessvalues of the limb bones between A. cristatus and the otheriguanid taxa; (3) there is no significant difference in the meancompactness vales of the forelimbs and hind limbs in A.cristatus; (4) there are no significant differences in the meancompactness values of the forelimbs and hind limbs in theterrestrial iguanid taxa. A rejection of the second, third, andfourth null hypothesis was expected based on previous studyresults on bone compactness values (Germain and Laurin, 2005;Kriloff et al., 2008; Canoville and Laurin, 2010; Houssaye et al.,2010). The histology was assessed qualitatively (Table 3).Several long bones which are pictured appear blurred, whichis a result of the great amount of lipid deposits in the cortex.Lipid deposits could not be completely removed chemicallyalthough the long bones were treated for almost half a year withmethylene chloride.
RESULTS
Bone Compactness, Histology, and Skeletochronology of TerrestrialIguanines.—All terrestrial iguanines share several bone histolog-ical features in their limb bones. They all show avascularlamellar-zonal bone tissue type (Figs. 2–4). The mean compact-ness values of the forelimbs are significantly higher thanequivalent means of the hind limbs (paired t-test: t = 2.02, P <0.05). Erosion cavities scattered in the cortex are rarely preservedin any terrestrial iguanine, contrary to the frequent resorptionprocesses in the inner cortical region that surrounds themedullary cavity. Larger terrestrial iguanine species (large size:Cyclura cornuta, Conolophus subcristatus, Iguana iguana, Brachylo-phus fasciatus, Ctenosaura similis, Figs. 3, 6; Table 1) show a higherloss of the growth record of the inner cortical region by resorptionprocesses than smaller-bodied species (Dipsosaurus dorsalis,Sauromalus obesus; Table 1; Fig. 2). Therefore, bone samples of
TA
BL
E2.
Co
nti
nu
ed.
M#
EO
.c.
S(S
E)
P(S
E)
Min
(SE
)M
ax(S
E)
R2
D.
do
rsa
lis
SM
F71
284
Hu
0.72
50.
0121
347(
0.00
0042
9)0.
5199
708(
0)2.
4882
31e-
7(3.
6794
17e-
6)0.
9999
99(2
.404
878e
-6)
0.99
9428
5R
a0.
836
0.01
4560
7(0.
0000
779)
0.40
1887
9(0.
0001
416)
2.53
4891
e-7(
0)0.
9999
99(7
.137
321e
-6)
0.99
8712
Ul
0.64
70.
0157
988(
0.00
0060
1)0.
5887
567(
0.00
0105
6)3.
2555
42e-
7(7.
2540
59e-
7)0.
9999
99(0
)0.
9993
554
Fe
0.57
00.
0118
036(
0.00
0044
)0.
6513
483(
0)8.
6189
12e-
8(1.
0570
29e-
7)0.
9999
99(0
)0.
9994
823
Ti
0.53
70.
0192
889(
0.00
0080
6)0.
6756
645(
0.00
0117
5)5.
4572
79e-
8(1.
1065
78e-
7)0.
9986
15(0
.000
0961
)0.
9984
058
Fi
0.69
40.
0105
01(0
.000
0415
)0.
5481
516(
0)5.
3493
01e-
8(0)
0.99
9999
(0)
0.99
9599
6S
.o
bes
us
NM
B57
43H
u0.
784
0.01
2187
2(0.
0000
699)
0.46
1625
8(0.
0000
322)
1.95
4733
e-7(
0)0.
9999
99(0
)0.
9997
176
Ra
0.88
50.
0146
428(
0.00
0082
)0.
3359
905(
0.00
0148
8)2.
6599
51e-
7(4.
3563
58e-
7)0.
9999
99(0
.000
0113
)0.
9986
119
Ul
0.81
60.
0070
622(
0.00
0045
2)0.
4253
315(
0)2.
1559
09e-
8(0)
0.42
5331
5(0)
0.99
9980
8F
e0.
636
0.00
6440
3(0.
0000
346)
0.59
9207
6(0.
0000
34)
4.55
8876
e-8(
3.97
2884
e-7)
0.99
9999
(0.0
0002
05)
0.99
9846
2T
i0.
737
0.01
8229
4(0.
0000
873)
0.50
6548
(0.0
0015
89)
3.85
4766
e-7(
1.12
8553
e-6)
0.99
9999
(7.9
9165
3e-6
)0.
9985
869
Fi
0.83
90.
0107
499(
0.00
0059
9)0.
3986
942(
0.00
0096
5)2.
5281
11e-
7(1.
4191
89e-
6)0.
9999
99(0
)0.
9994
375
I.ig
ua
na
NM
B13
801
Hu
0.60
30.
0128
688(
0.00
0040
2)0.
6255
007(
0.00
0085
6)9.
2667
57e-
6(3.
8574
71e-
6)0.
9999
99(0
.000
019)
0.99
9515
4R
a0.
693
0.01
2888
7(0.
0000
424)
0.55
0035
9(0.
0003
947)
1.44
5104
e-7(
3.38
2483
e-7)
0.99
9999
(0.0
0003
06)
0.99
9053
5U
l0.
562
0.00
9540
8(0.
0000
334)
0.65
7807
3(0.
0001
448)
1.03
9983
e-7(
3.74
6039
e-7)
0.99
9999
(0.0
0001
26)
0.99
9981
3F
e0.
563
0.00
8720
9(0.
0000
316)
0.65
6202
6(0)
3.71
1061
e-8(
0)0.
9999
99(0
)0.
9997
7T
i0.
551
0.01
4259
7(0.
0000
394)
0.66
4881
7(0.
0000
715)
1.88
6579
e-7(
0)0.
9999
99(4
.211
771e
-6)
0.99
8842
1F
i0.
583
0.01
1636
8(0.
0000
595)
0.64
2036
7(0.
0001
134)
2.46
6030
e-7(
2.04
7006
e-6)
0.99
9999
(0.0
0001
32)
0.99
9253
BONE HISTOLOGY OF THE GALAPAGOS MARINE IGUANA 315
![Page 6: Life History and Skeletal Adaptations in the Galapagos Marine Iguana ( Amblyrhynchus cristatus ) as Reconstructed with Bone Histological Data—A Comparative Study of Iguanines](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022080421/5750a4561a28abcf0ca99574/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
iguanines of smaller adult size often still display parts of theembryonic bone as innermost cortical growth cycle (Fig. 2).However, all terrestrial iguanines show a thin layer of endosteallamellar bone that is deposited around the medullary cavity(Figs. 2, 3A,C–F, 6C–F).
All terrestrial iguanines were sexually mature. The age of theattainment of sexual maturity is marked by the first steep andabrupt decline in growth cycle thickness. The subsequentgrowth cycles instead slightly increase their thickness for oneor two growth cycles again before continuously decreasing theirthicknesses annually (Figs. 2, 3C–F). Therefore, the lagsconverge continuously before they cannot be distinguishedany more from each other in the outermost cortical region (i.e.,efs). Iguanines of smaller-bodied adult size show a shorter timeperiod between the attainment of sexual maturity and thedevelopment of the efs as measured by the counting of thegrowth cycles (Fig. 2). The majority of growth is reached beforesexual maturity in small iguanines. In iguanines of larger adultbody size, in contrast, sexual maturity occurs well beforegrowth is terminated (Fig. 3).
The growth zones and annuli are placed randomly within thegrowth cycles in all terrestrial iguanines except for C.subcristatus, the sister group of A. cristatus. Conolophus sub-cristatus shows alternating and regular distribution of thegrowth zones and annuli within the growth cycles.
In the limb bone samples of C. subcristatus a maximum of 13growth cycles are preserved (Fig. 6C–D). The first abruptdecrease in growth cycle thickness, which indicates sexualmaturity, is still preserved although large parts of the innerperiosteal growth record are destroyed by resorption (Fig. 6C–D). The growth cycles of C. subcristatus also increase againslightly in thickness after the attainment of sexual maturity, butcontrary to the data of other terrestrial iguanines, the growthcycle thicknesses then remain rather constant, but of smallerthickness than before the abrupt decline, until the efs isdeveloped (Fig. 6C–D). Therefore, C. subcristatus shows amixture between the growth patterns of A. cristatus and theother terrestrial iguanines. In addition, the growth zones andannuli show a similar color pattern in polarized light like A.cristatus. The collagenous fibers of each growth zone are all
FIG. 1. Phylogeny of the studied iguanines and summary of results. Left column shows the phylogeny of the studied iguanines, which is modifiedfrom Wiens and Hollingsworth (2000). The results are summarized on the right column of the figure.
TABLE 3. Specific skeletochronological and histological information for the studied Marine Iguanas. The number of the lags varies only in the femurand the tibia, which show higher resorption of the inner wall of the cortex. Abbreviations: an: annulus, efs: external fundamental system, gz: growthzone, sm-t: growth cycle when sexual maturation is reached. *: Fernandina specimens are generally larger than Espanola specimens. **: this individualis morphologically regarded as a subadult because of smaller size compared to the adults from Fernandina.
Specimen Sex
Length
humerus [mm]
Preserved growth
cycle number
Age at change
of light pattern Development of efs
NKMB 30260 Adult male 63.2 17 sixth year 13. to 20. growth cycleZFMK (uncataloged) Adult male* 75.0 10 sixth year not yet an efsZFMK (uncataloged) Adult female* 62.9 13 third year 7. to 9. growth cycleZFMK (uncataloged) Subadult male** 64.5 9 seventh year not yet an efs
316 J. HUGI AND M. R. SANCHEZ-VILLAGRA
![Page 7: Life History and Skeletal Adaptations in the Galapagos Marine Iguana ( Amblyrhynchus cristatus ) as Reconstructed with Bone Histological Data—A Comparative Study of Iguanines](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022080421/5750a4561a28abcf0ca99574/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
oriented equally throughout the growth record until the efs isdeveloped. The collagenous fibers of the annuli are all equallyoriented but in another direction than the ones of the growthzones, which results in a constant pattern of alternating bands oftwo colors. This specific color pattern is maintained until the efsis developed (Fig. 6D,F). At sexual maturity, the growth zonesand annuli equally decrease their thickness within the corre-sponding growth cycle. The growth zones and annuli are ofequal thickness within the growth cycles after sexual maturity isreached and remain similarly distributed until the efs isdeveloped (Fig. 6E–F).
Bone Compactness and Histology of Amblyrhynchus cristatus.—Alllong bones of the limbs show high compactness values, except forthe femur and tibia (Table 2; Fig. 1). Therefore, the meancompactness values of the forelimbs of A. cristatus weresignificantly higher than the equivalent data of the hind limbs(paired t-test: t = 2.1, P < 0.05). The mean compactness values ofall limb bones of A. cristatus were significantly higher than theequivalent data of the terrestrial iguanines (paired t-test: t =1.998, P < 0.05). The humerus, radius, ulna, and fibula of A.cristatus show the highest cortico-diaphyseal index or CDI(thickness of the cortex of the bone divided by the radius of thebone, Castanet et al., 2000) with even less resorption of the innerregion of the cortex than the femur and tibia. In addition, smallcircular layers of endosteally deposited lamellar bone arepreserved surrounding the medullary cavity (Figs. 4C,D, 5B,D).The increase of bone compactness values of all limb bones isreached by a continuous and regular accretion of primary,centrifugally deposited, periosteal bone along the outer corticalregion combined with minor remodeling processes of the innercortical region. The medullary cavity is free of endosteal bonedeposits in the single female but not in all the males. The humeriof the two male specimens from Fernandina show trabeculae,which are not only preserved in the medullary cavity of theepiphyseal and metaphyseal region but also in the diaphysis (Fig.5G,H). In all the males, the occurrence of resorption processes isrestricted to the inner cortical region, whereas one limb bone ofthe female, the tibia, also shows various erosion cavities scatteredin the cortex (ZFMK-uncataloged female) (Fig. 5A,B). However,this difference did not affect the mean compactness values of thelimb bones of the female specimen compared to equivalent dataof the male A. cristatus (paired t-test: t = 2.2, P < 0.05).
The cortices of the limb bones are of avascular lamellar-zonal
bone tissue type (Figs. 4, 5). The limb bones, which show least
remodeling processes (i.e., humerus, radius, ulna, and fibula),
show one innermost periosteal bone layer of a matrix of less
organized woven-fibered bone grading into parallel-fibered bone
(wp; Figs. 4C,D, 5D) that is identified as embryonic bone
(Francillon-Vieillot et al., 1990). The wp layer is bordered by a lag
that represents the hatching line (Fig. 5D; Pilorge and Castanet,
1981; Nouira et al., 1982). The bone matrix of the embryonic bone
differs from the other periosteal growth cycles in being opaque or
monofringent in polarized light based on the high amount of
unorganized collagenous fibers. This innermost periosteal layer
further displays a high number of roundish osteocyte lacunae
(Figs. 4G–H, 5E–F). The osteocyte lacunae of the other,
subsequent growth cycles, in contrast, are scattered and roundish
to flattened and the bone matrix is birefringent in polarized light.
The growth cycles are of constant thickness up to the
outermost cortical region where the distribution of lags abruptly
becomes closely spaced (efs; Figs. 4C–H, 5D–H; Table 3). All
growth cycles, besides the innermost wp layer and the
outermost ones that belong to the efs, are divided clearly into
a growth zone and an annulus. The growth zone and annuli
vary in the shape of the osteocyte lacunae as well as in the color
of the bone matrix visible in polarized light (Glimcher and Muir,
1984). Each growth cycle consists of these two well-separated
subunits that are visible as bands of two alternating colors in the
cortex in polarized light in all males and the one female. The
thicknesses of the two subunits distinctly change one time
during the ontogeny: at a constant time frame in both the males
(sixth to seventh year, Table 3) and in the female (third year,
Table 3). Before this change, the growth zones are thick, whereas
the annuli are thin (Figs. 4F,H, 5F). This distinct change is
accompanied further by the higher presence of supernumerary
lags. The change in the characteristics of the color pattern and
the presence of supernumerary lags occur during the sixth and
seventh growth cycle in the male specimens (Figs. 4C–H, 5G–H;
Table 3) and during the third to fourth year in the female
specimen (Fig. 5D–F; Table 3). The peculiarity of this event is
less developed in the sampled female: growth zones are thicker
than the annuli before this event but of almost equal thickness
after it (Fig. 4E–H).
FIG. 2. Microstructure of the long bones of Dipsosaurus dorsalis. Diaphyseal transverse sections of the humerus of an adult Desert Iguana (SMF71284) as an example for the spacing pattern of small-bodied lizards and random color pattern within the growth cycles in terrestrial iguanines, withConolophus subcristatus as an exception. Image A and B in normal transmitted light. Image C in polarized light with Lambda compensator. In allimages A, B, and C, the specimen shows five lags (arrow heads) and, therefore, was at its sixth year at death. Image A shows the steep decrease in thethickness at sexual maturity (number 2). The subsequent growth cycles increase in thickness after this event before decreasing again until the efs isdeveloped. Abbreviations: hl: hatching line; el: endosteally deposited lamellar bone that surrounds the medullary cavity; wp: woven-fibered bonegrading into parallel-fibered bone.
BONE HISTOLOGY OF THE GALAPAGOS MARINE IGUANA 317
![Page 8: Life History and Skeletal Adaptations in the Galapagos Marine Iguana ( Amblyrhynchus cristatus ) as Reconstructed with Bone Histological Data—A Comparative Study of Iguanines](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022080421/5750a4561a28abcf0ca99574/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
DISCUSSION
The limb bones of A. cristatus differ in mean bone
compactness values, as well as in the growth pattern of the
cortex (i.e., constant growth cycle thicknesses up to the efs, well-
separated growth zones and annuli up to the efs) in comparison
with terrestrial iguanid relatives. We discuss the bone histology
in the light of ecological findings for A. cristatus that report
prolonged longevity, delayed sexual maturity, and climate-
dependent reproductive seasons.
Are Thick Cortices a Result of Foraging Strategies?—The mean
compactness values of the limb bones of A. cristatus were
significantly higher than the equivalent data for terrestrial
iguanid relatives and other lizards (Kriloff et al., 2008; Canoville
and Laurin, 2010; this study). All iguanines have forelimbs with
higher compactness values than the hind limbs, but the deviation
was more distinct in A. cristatus, which also showed higher mean
compactness values (Table 2). Therefore, the limb bones of A.
cristatus might be used for buoyancy control while exclusively
feeding on intertidal and subtidal macrophytic algae (e.g.,
Trillmich and Trillmich, 1986). Heavy bones act as ballast
allowing a hydrostatic control of body trim in water (Hoffstetter,
1955; Taylor, 2000). Increase in bone compactness, especially in
the forelimbs, counteracts lung buoyancy and, therefore, facili-
tates diving and long-lasting underwater stays (Kaiser, 1966;
Ricqles and Buffrenil, 2001). Moreover, the increase in body
density would counteract the action of waves and improve
stability in rough water (Ricqles and Buffrenil, 2001). The limb
bone sample of the female A. cristatus was not significantly
FIG. 3. Microstructure of the long bones of Cyclura cornuta. Diaphyseal transverse section of the tibia (image A to F) of an adult male RhinocerosIguana (ZFMK 5223) as an example of the spacing pattern in terrestrial iguanines, with Conolophus subcristatus as an exception. The growth cyclescontinuously decrease in thickness after the onset of sexual maturity (grey arrow head nr. 3*), which is marked by a steep decrease in the growth cyclethickness. The growth cycle thicknesses continuously decrease until the efs is developed (grey arrow heads in the outermost region of the cortex, nr. 7to 8). Arrows mark supernumerary lags. Images A, C, E in normal transmitted light, whereas image B, D, F in polarized light. Image C and D show aminimum number of eight lags. The more detailed view of images E and F do not reveal a distinct color pattern at least not after sexual maturity isreached. Growth cycles are randomly composed of lighter and darker colored bone layers in polarized light. Abbreviation: res.: resorption processes inthe inner cortical region. For additional abbreviations see Figure 2.
318 J. HUGI AND M. R. SANCHEZ-VILLAGRA
![Page 9: Life History and Skeletal Adaptations in the Galapagos Marine Iguana ( Amblyrhynchus cristatus ) as Reconstructed with Bone Histological Data—A Comparative Study of Iguanines](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022080421/5750a4561a28abcf0ca99574/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
FIG. 4. Microstructure of the long bones of Amblyrhynchus cristatus (I). Diaphyseal transverse sections of the radius of the adult male A. cristatusfrom Espanola (NKMB 30260). Images A, C, E, G in normal transmitted light, whereas images B, D, F, H in polarized light. Images C and D show thecomplete growth record with up to 17 growth cycles (numbered arrow heads). The growth cycles only decrease in thickness after the age of 10 yearswhen the efs is developed (grey arrow heads in the outermost region of the cortex). Arrows mark supernumerary lags. Images E to H aremagnifications of the cortical region where the thicknesses of the growth zones (gz) and annuli (an) change. Abbreviations: efs: external fundamentalsystem; f. ost.: flattened osteocyte lacunae; r. ost.: round osteocyte lacunae; sm-t: bone histological transition of sexual maturity. For additionalabbreviations, see Figure 2.
BONE HISTOLOGY OF THE GALAPAGOS MARINE IGUANA 319
![Page 10: Life History and Skeletal Adaptations in the Galapagos Marine Iguana ( Amblyrhynchus cristatus ) as Reconstructed with Bone Histological Data—A Comparative Study of Iguanines](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022080421/5750a4561a28abcf0ca99574/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
FIG. 5. Microstructure of the long bones of Amblyrhynchus cristatus (II). Images A and B show the diaphyseal transverse sections of the tibia of theadult female A. cristatus from Fernandina (ZFMK-uncataloged) in normal transmitted light. The tibia shows high resorption processes of the innercortical region (res.), as well as secondary erosion cavities (e.c) in the cortical region. Images C, D, E (normal transmitted light), and F (polarized lightwith Lambda compensator) show the diaphyseal transverse section of the humerus of the female A. cristatus. The sampled female was in its 10th yearof life with nine preserved lags (arrow heads). Images E and F show a magnification of the area at which the characteristics of the growth zoneschange. Image G show the exact transverse sections of the mid-shaft of the humerus of the adult male A. cristatus from Fernandina (ZFMK-uncataloged), whereas image H shows the subadult male specimen from the same island. Both males exhibit trabeculae (p. trab.) within the medullarycavity. For abbreviations see Figure 2–4.
320 J. HUGI AND M. R. SANCHEZ-VILLAGRA
![Page 11: Life History and Skeletal Adaptations in the Galapagos Marine Iguana ( Amblyrhynchus cristatus ) as Reconstructed with Bone Histological Data—A Comparative Study of Iguanines](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022080421/5750a4561a28abcf0ca99574/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
different from the bone compactness values of the males,although the female specimen shows erosion cavities in thecortex of the tibia, which are not present in any male specimen.The exclusive presence of erosion cavities in the tibia of thefemale reflects other data of reabsorption of calcium duringreproduction in lizards (e.g., Varanus niloticus, see Buffrenil andFrancillon-Vieillot, 2001).
The high mean compactness values of the limb bones of thefemale A. cristatus was not expected, because females feedexclusively in the intertidal zones (Bartholomew, 1966; Trillmichand Trillmich, 1986) where diving is not necessary. Therefore,limb bones of higher compactness values might also be usefulfor counterbalancing high muscular forces that are developedfor providing a strong hold to the shore while feeding inintertidal zones. Another explanation could be that a shortage offood forces A. cristatus use different feeding grounds (juvenilesand adult females in intertidal zones, adult males in subtidalzones; e.g., Bartholomew, 1966) and that the high compactnessvalues are an exaptation in females. The bone compactnessvalues of A. cristatus, therefore, show no deviation within adults
of different body size (females vs. males). The variouspopulations of A. cristatus on different islands differ amongeach other in body size. Our sample contains animals from twodifferent islands for which this size dimorphism is reported: A.cristatus from Fernandina are generally larger in body size thanthe ones from Espanola (Wikelski and Trillmich, 1997; Eibl-Eibesfeldt, 2001; Wikelski, 2005), but they show the same meancompactness values as the males of smaller adult size fromEspanola. The males from Fernandina further show trabeculaein the mid-shaft region of the medullary cavity of exclusive thehumerus (Fig. 5G,H).
Constant Thickness of the Growth Cycles up to efs.—Thethicknesses of the growth cycles of A. cristatus remain constantuntil the efs is developed (Fig. 7B). This annual bone growthperiod, which produces constant growth cycle thicknesses, is anunusual pattern for lizards and has, at least to our knowledge,not been reported in any other lizard in such a regular mannerfrom all bones of several specimens. One lizard, with a similarbut less extreme distribution of growth cycles of equalthicknesses, is the Nile monitor, Varanus niloticus. However, the
FIG. 6. Microstructure of the long bones of Conolophus subcristatus. Diaphyseal transverse sections of the fibula of an adult male Galapagos LandIguana (CAS 10475). Images A, C, and D in normal transmitted light, image B, D, and F in polarized light. Images C and D show the region with themost complete growth record, where 13 growth cycles are preserved (arrow heads). Although the growth cycles decrease in thickness at the sm-t (greyarrow head numbered with *5), they are of small but rather equal thickness until the efs is developed (grey arrow heads in the outermost region of thecortex). The higher magnification of this transition is shown in images E and F. For abbreviations see Figures 2–4.
BONE HISTOLOGY OF THE GALAPAGOS MARINE IGUANA 321
![Page 12: Life History and Skeletal Adaptations in the Galapagos Marine Iguana ( Amblyrhynchus cristatus ) as Reconstructed with Bone Histological Data—A Comparative Study of Iguanines](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022080421/5750a4561a28abcf0ca99574/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
occurrence of this pattern varies (fig. 4 in Buffrenil and Castanet,2000). The combination of such a regular annual growthdeposition until the efs is developed and minor resorption ofthe inner cortical bone material produces these high compactnessvalues in the limb bones of A. cristatus.
Wikelski and Thom (2000) examined the growth of A. cristatusduring El Nino rainfalls and reported that A. cristatus ‘‘shrink’’(reduction in their body length) during these re-occurringrainfalls, most probably attributable to energetic stress and lowfood availability. An abrupt decrease in the growth cyclethickness is only preserved when the efs is developed. In thosespecimens for which data are available (Table 1), no severe ElNino rainfall was documented during their life spans.
Bone Histological Indicators for Embryonic Bone and SexualMaturity.—The bone matrix of the innermost periosteal growthcycle of the limb bones with the most complete growth record(humerus, radius, ulna, fibula) is composed of woven-fiberedbone grading into parallel-fibered bone. This bone tissue,classically considered to result from a high bone deposition rate,is characterized by its monorefringent reaction to polarized lightand a high density of osteocyte lacunae with numerous canaliculioriginating in these lacunae (Francillon-Vieillot et al., 1990; Figs.4C–D, 5D).
The attainment of sexual maturity of A. cristatus is notindicated by an abrupt decrease in the growth cycle thickness asin other lizards (e.g., Castanet, 1985; Castanet et al., 1993; Fig.7A) but might instead be indicated by a distinct change in thecolor pattern of the cortex visible in polarized light (Figs. 4C–H;5D–F). Each growth cycle of the cortex of the A. cristatus iscomposed of a well-separated growth zone and an annulus. Thegrowth zones and annuli differ slightly from each other in thebone tissue based on different bone deposition rates duringfavored and nonfavored seasons (Castanet et al., 1993). In A.cristatus, the thickness of these two subunits, but not amountand shape of the osteocyte lacunae and the color in polarizedlight, change once in the growth record within a similar timeframe in the males but earlier in the only female (Table 3). Theages that can be inferred from counting the annually depositedgrowth cycles coincides with the reported age when A. cristatusreach sexual maturity (Trillmich and Trillmich, 1984). Wehypothesize that the change of this color pattern indicates theattainment of sexual maturity in A. cristatus.
Neither is the development of the efs taken as indicator thatsexual maturity is reached; instead, closely aligned lags of theefs mark the termination of the growth of an animal (Horner etal., 2001). The first steep decrease in growth rate is equivalentto the reported ages when sexual maturity is reached (e.g., Zugand Rand, 1987; Castanet et al., 1988; Castanet and Baez, 1991).It is well known that small-bodied lizards show shorter termlife histories compared to larger relatives, although inter- andintraspecific variation occurs (Andrews, 1982; Shine andCharnov, 1992). The variation between the size differencesbetween small and large taxa is mainly a result of thedifferences in the maintenance of growth after sexual maturityis reached: large taxa reach sexual maturity well before thetermination of growth, whereas small-bodied lizards areskeletally mature shortly after this event (Andrews, 1982;Shine and Charnov, 1992; e.g., Cyclura cornuta vs. Dipsosaurusdorsalis: this study). There is no exception to this rule for thedata from A. cristatus. This consistency would support theecological evidence that A. cristatus reaches sexual maturitywell before the attainment of full adult size as in other middle-sized or large iguanines, which is the plesiomorphic reptiliancondition (Erickson et al., 2007).
The change in the thickness of the growth zones and theannuli could be a result of the beginning of mating behavior,which is sex dependent (Trillmich and Trillmich, 1984). Themating cycles of A. cristatus are annual and dependent on twodistinct seasons (Christian and Tracy, 1982; Werner, 1982).Conolophus subcristatus, which shows a similar color pattern,exhibits the same conserved reproductive cycle as the otherterrestrial iguanines (e.g., Wiewandt, 1982; Table 1), startingthe mating season at the beginning of the warm and wetseason. The reproductive season of A. cristatus, in contrast,starts in the cold and dry season, which is introduced by theoccurrence of the cold and nutrient-rich Humboldt currentswhich, in turn, strongly influence the reproduction and growthof the algae. Therefore, A. cristatus serves as example ofplasticity in the reproductive cycle of lizards, being dependentmainly on the food availability. Bone histological data appearto be congruent with this observation. First, the histologicalchange in the color pattern of the growth cycles occurs duringthe time when females and males start to reproduce (Tables 1,3). In A. cristatus, this hypothesis is supported by slightdifferences of the color pattern between male and femalespecimens as well as by the timing when the pattern changes.
FIG. 7. The spatial distribution of the lags and the color pattern interrestrial iguanines in comparison to Amblyrhynchus cristatus with itspossible link to the reproduction cycle. (A) The general growth patternof terrestrial iguanines. (1) The deposition of bone (lzb) in the outercortical region and the resorption processes of the inner cortical region(res.) are more or less ‘‘balanced,’’ (2) one innermost periosteal bonelayer of woven-fibered bone grading into parallel-fibered bone (wp) isdeposited during the early ontogeny, (3) continuous decrease of growthcycle thicknesses before the efs and an abrupt decrease in growth cyclethickness when sexual maturity is reached (sm-t). (B) General growthpattern of A. cristatus. (1) The deposition of bone (lzb) in the outercortical region and the resorption processes of the inner cortical region(res.) show an ‘‘imbalance,’’ (2) one innermost periosteal bone layer ofwoven-fibered bone grading into parallel-fibered bone (wp) is depositedduring the early ontogeny, (3) growth cycle thicknesses remain constantuntil the efs is developed and no or only a slight decrease in thicknessoccurs when sexual maturity is reached (sm-t?).
322 J. HUGI AND M. R. SANCHEZ-VILLAGRA
![Page 13: Life History and Skeletal Adaptations in the Galapagos Marine Iguana ( Amblyrhynchus cristatus ) as Reconstructed with Bone Histological Data—A Comparative Study of Iguanines](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022080421/5750a4561a28abcf0ca99574/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Ecological studies of A. cristatus report sexual maturity at threeto five years in females and six to eight years for males (Laurie,1990), which corresponds to the growth cycle number at whichthe first change is observed (Figs. 4, 5C–F; Table 3).
Second, there is a slight histological variation between malesand females (Figs. 4, 5C–F). In females, the thicknesses of thegrowth zones and the annuli are more or less equal after sexualmaturity is reached, whereas they show other thicknesses atsexual maturity (one subunit becoming thinner and the otherone becoming thicker), which is maintained until the efs isdeveloped. This could be explained as follows: A. cristatus,which are not yet sexually mature, spend all their time baskingand feeding on algae. After they reach sexual maturity, thepremating and mating period takes most of the dry season orannulus season (Trillmich and Trillmich, 1984). Males do notfeed or feed little during the period of premating and mating,because they start to be highly territorial, showing malecompetition to monopolize access to females as soon as theyarrive at mating sites (Trillmich and Trillmich, 1984). In contrast,females continue to forage during the premating and matingperiod and only stop feeding when aggregating to the nestingground and while defending their nests for several weeks to amonth. The relatively long period of fasting of the malescompared to females could be reflected in the more drasticchange in the characteristics of the growth zone and annulus atand after sexual maturity is reached. Male C. subcristatus, incontrast, are not territorial and, therefore, still feed, althoughless, during the reproductive season (Werner, 1982, 1983), whichcould explain the less drastic change in the characteristics of thegrowth zones and annuli at sexual maturity compared to maleA. cristatus. Another explanation could be the relatively shorterreproduction cycle relative to that of A. cristatus.
The life history of A. cristatus reconstructed with bonehistology appears to be strikingly congruent with observationsprovided by ecological studies (Table 1, Fig. 7). Bone histologicalfeatures appear to coincide with the ecological data on theplasticity of the reproduction cycle, longevity, as well as the agewhen sexual maturity is reached. Specifically, single life stagesof A. cristatus appear to be reflected in the growth record of thelimb bones by the presence of wp (embryonic bone), the changein the thickness of alternating colored bands (sexual maturity),as well as the development of the efs (termination of growth). Incontrast to A. cristatus, life-history data based on bone histologyfor other iguanines is often more or less obscured as a result ofhigher remodeling processes, which often destroy the innermostgrowth record of the cortex (Fig. 3). Only the long bones of thesmall-sized iguanines, Dipsosaurus dorsalis (Fig. 2) and Sauroma-lus obesus (Table 1) reveal the complete growth record in thecortices by showing minor remodeling processes that only affectparts of the inner cortical region. These data on skeletochronol-ogy are congruent with previously published demographic andecological data (Table 1).
Acknowledgments.—We would like to thank T. Scheyer, J.Neenan, U. Koller, and B. Hausler for their invaluable help.Samples were kindly made available for the study by A. E.Leviton (San Francisco), G. Kohler (Frankfurt), R. Winkler (Basel),W. Bohme (Bonn), F. Zachos and A. Honnen (formerly Kiel). Weare thankful to N. Klein and A. Houssaye and several anonymousreviewers for providing very useful suggestions on earlierversions of the manuscript. The Swiss National Science Founda-tion supported this project (grant 31003A-133032/1 to MRS-V).
LITERATURE CITED
ABTS, M. L. 1987. Environment and variation in life history traits of theChuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus. Ecological Monograph 57(3):215–232.
ANDREWS, R. M. 1982. Patterns of growth in reptiles. In C. Gans and F. H.Pough (eds.), Biology of the Reptilia. Vol. 13: Physiology D, 273–320.Academic Press, London.
BARTHOLOMEW, A. B. 1966. A field study of temperature relations in theGalapagos Marine Iguana. Copeia 2:241–250.
BARTHOLOMEW, G. A., A. F. BENNETT, AND W. R. DAWSON. 1976. Swimming,diving and lactate production of the Marine Iguana, Amblyrhynchuscristatus. Copeia 4:709–720.
BENNETT, A. F., W. B. DAWSON, AND G. A. BARTHOLOMEW. 1975. Effects ofactivity and temperature on aerobic and anaerobic metabolism in theGalapagos Marine Iguana. Journal of Comparative Physiology 100:317–329.
BOERSMA, D. B. 1983. An ecological study on the Galapagos MarineIguana. In R. I. BOWMAN, M. BERSON, AND A. E. LEVITON (eds.), Patternsof Evolution in Galapagos Organisms, pp. 157–176. AAAS, PacificDivision, San Francisco.
BUFFRENIL, DE V., AND J. CASTANET. 2000. Age estimation by skeletochro-nolgy in the Nile Monitor (Varanus niloticus), a highly exploitedspecies. Journal of Herpetology 34(3):414–424.
BUFFRENIL, DE V., AND H. FRANCILLON-VIEILLOT. 2001. Ontogenetic changesin bone compactness in male and female Nile Monitors (Varanusniloticus). Journal of Zoology 254:539–546.
BUFFRENIL, DE V., AND J.-C. RAGE. 1993. La ‘‘pachyostose’’ vertebrale deSimoliophis (Reptilia, Squamata) : Donnees comparatives et consid-erations fonctionnelles. Annales de Paleontologie 79:315–35.
BUFFRENIL, DE V., A. CANOVILLE, R. D’ANASTASIO, AND D. P. DOMNING. 2010.Evolution of sirenian pachyosteosclerosis, a model-case for the studyof bone structure in aquatic tetrapods. Journal of MammalianEvolution 17(2):101–120.
CANOVILLE, A., AND M. LAURIN. 2010. Evolution of humeral microanatomyand lifestyle in amniotes, and some comments on palaeobiologicalinferences. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 100:384–406.
CASTANET, J. 1985. La squelettochronologie chez les reptiles. I. Resultatsexperimentaux sur la signification des marques croissance squelet-tiques chez les Lezards et les Tortues. Annales des SciencesNaturelles Zoologie, Paris 13e Serie (7):23–40.
CASTANET, J., AND M. BAEZ. 1991. Adaptation and evolution in Gallotializards from the Canary Islands: age, growth, maturity andlongevity. Amphibia-Reptilia 12:81–102.
CASTANET, J., AND J. P. GASC. 1986. Age individuel, longevite et cycled’activite chez Leposoma guianense, microteiide de litiere del’ecosysteme forestier guyanais. Memoires de la Musee Historiqueet Naturelles, (Paris) 132:281–288.
CASTANET, J., AND G. NAULLEAU. 1985. La squelettochronologie chez lesreptiles. II. Resultats experimentaux sur la signification des marquesde croissance squelettiques chez les serpents. Remarques sur lacroissance et la longevite de la Vipere Aspic. Annales des SciencesNaturelles Zoologie. Paris. 13e Serie (7):41–62.
CASTANET, J., D. G. NEWMAN, AND H. SAINT GIRONS. 1988. Skeletochrono-logical data on the growth, age, and population structure of theTuatara, Sphenodon punctatus, on Stephens and Lady Alice Islands,New Zealand. Herpetologica 44(1):25–37.
CASTANET, J., H. FRANCILLON-VIEILLOT, F. J. MEUNIER, AND A. DE RICQLES.1993. Bone and individual aging. In B. K. Hall (ed.), Bone. Vol. 7:Bone Growth-B, pp. 245–283. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
CASTANET, J., K. C. ROGERS, J. CUBO, AND J.-J. BOISARD. 2000. Periosteal bonegrowth rates in extant ratites (ostrich and emu). Implications forassessing growth in dinosaurs. Comptes Rendus de l’Academie desSciences de Paris, Sciences de la vie/Life sciences 323:543–550.
CHINSAMY-TURAN, A. 2005. The Microstructure of Dinosaur Bone,Deciphering Biology with Fine-Scale Techniques. Johns HopkinsUniversity Press, Baltimore, MD.
CHRISTIAN, K. A., AND C. R. TRACY. 1982. Reproductive behavior ofGalapagos Land Iguanas, Conolophus pallidus, on Isla Santa Fe,Galapagos. In G. M. Burghardt and A. S. Rand (eds.), Iguanas of theWorld, Their Behavior, Ecology, and Conservation, pp. 366–379.New Series in Animal Behavior, Ecology, Conservation andManagement. Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, NJ.
CHRISTIAN, K. A., C. R. TRACY, AND W. P. PORTER. 1984. Diet, digestion, andfood preferences of Galapagos Land Iguanas. Herpetologica 40(2):205–212.
COLINVAUX, P. A. 1972. Climate and the Galapagos Islands. Nature 240:17–20.
BONE HISTOLOGY OF THE GALAPAGOS MARINE IGUANA 323
![Page 14: Life History and Skeletal Adaptations in the Galapagos Marine Iguana ( Amblyrhynchus cristatus ) as Reconstructed with Bone Histological Data—A Comparative Study of Iguanines](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022080421/5750a4561a28abcf0ca99574/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
EIBL-EIBESFELDT, I. 2001. Galapagos—Die Arche Noah im Pazifik, PiperMunchen Zurich.
ERICKSON, G. M., K. CURRY ROGERS, AND S. A. YERBY. 2001. Dinosaurgrowth patterns and rapid avian growth rates. Nature 412:429–433.
ERICKSON, G. M., K. C. ROGERS, D. J. VARRICCHIO, M. A. NORELL, AND X. XU.2007. Growth patterns in brooding dinosaurs reveals the timing ofsexual maturity in non-avian dinosaurs and genesis of the aviancondition. Biological Letters 3:558–561.
ETHERIDGE, R. E. 1982. Checklist on the iguanine and Malagasy iguanidlizards. In G. M. Burghardt and A. S. Rand (eds.), Iguanas of theWorld, Their Behavior, Ecology, and Conservation, pp. 7–37. NewSeries in Animal Behavior, Ecology, Conservation and Manage-ment. Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, NJ.
FITCH, H. S., AND R. W. HENDERSON. 1977. Age and sex differences in thectenosaur (Ctenosaura similis). Milwaukee Publication of the MuseumContribution in Biology and Geology 11:1–11.
FRANCILLON-VIEILLOT, H., V. DE BUFFRENIL, J. CASTANET, J. GERAUDIE, F. J.MEUNIER, J. Y. SIRE, L. ZYLBERBERG, AND A. DE RICQLES, 1990.Microstructure and mineralisation of vertebrate tissue. In J. G.Carter (ed.), Skeletal Biomineralisation: Patterns, Processes andEvolutionary Trends. Vol. I, pp. 471–530. Van Nostrand Reinhold,New York.
GERMAIN, D., AND M. LAURIN. 2005. Microanatomy of the radius andlifestyle in amniotes (Vertebrata, Tetrapoda). Zoologica Scripta 34:335–350.
GIBBONS, J. 1984. Iguanas of the South Pacific. Oryx 18(2):82–91.GIRONDOT, M., AND M. LAURIN. 2003. Bone profiler: a tool to quantify,
model, and statistically compare bone-section compactness profiles.Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 23(2):458–461.
GLIMCHER, M. J., AND H. MUIR. 1984. Recent studies of the mineral phasein bone and its possible linkage to the organic matrix by protein-bound phosphate bonds [and Discussion]. Philosophical Transac-tions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences304(1121):479–508.
HOFFSTETTER, R. 1955. Squamates de type moderne. In J. Piveteau (ed.),Traite de Paleontologie 5, pp. 605–662. Masson, Paris.
HORNER, J. R., K. PADIAN, AND A. DE RICQLES. 2001. Comparativeosteohistology of some embryonic and perinatal archosaurs:developmental and behavioral implications for dinosaurs. Paleobi-ology 27(1):39–58.
HOUSSAYE, A. 2009. ‘‘Pachyostosis’’ in aquatic amniotes: a review.Integrative Zoology 4:325–340.
HOUSSAYE, A., A. MAZURIER, A. HERREL, V. VOLPATO, P. TAFFOREAU, R.BOISTEL, AND V. DE BUFFRENIL. 2010. Vertebral microanatomy insquamates: structure, growth and ecological correlates. Journal ofAnatomy 217:715–727.
IVERSON, J. B. 1982. Adaptations to herbivory in iguanine lizards. In G. M.Burghardt and A. S. Rand (eds.), Iguanas of the World, TheirBehavior, Ecology, and Conservation, pp. 60–76. New Series inAnimal Behavior, Ecology, Conservation and Management. NoyesPublications, Park Ridge, NJ.
KAISER, H. E. 1966. Functional anatomy of breathing and balance inseacows (Sirenia). Anatomical Record 55:246.
KRILOFF, A., D. GERMAIN, A. CANOVILLE, P. VINCENT, M. SACHE, AND M.LAURIN. 2008. Evolution of bone microanatomy of the tetrapod tibiaand its use in paleobiological inference. Journal of EvolutionaryBiology 21:807–826.
LAURIE, W. A. 1990. Population biology of Marine Iguanas (Amblyrhyn-chus cristatus). I. Changes in fecundity related to a population crash.Journal of Animal Ecology 59(2):515–528.
LAURIE, W. A., AND D. BROWN. 1990. Population biology of MarineIguanas (Amblyrhynchus cristatus). II. Changes in annual survivalrates and the effects of size, sex, age and fecundity in a populationcrash. Journal of Animal Ecology 59(2):529–544.
MAUTZ, W. J., AND K. A. NAGY. 1987. Ontogenetic changes in diet, fieldmetabolic rate, and water flux in the herbivorous lizard Dipsosaurusdorsalis. Physiological Zoology 60(6):640–658.
MOBERLY, W. R. 1963. Hibernation in the desert iguana, Dipsosaurusdorsalis. Physiological Zoology 36(2):152–160.
NAGY, K. A. 1973. Behavior, diet and reproduction in a desert lizard,Sauromalus obesus. Copeia 1:93–102.
NOUIRA, S., M. E. MAURY, J. CASTANET, AND R. BARBAULT. 1982.Determination squelettochronologique de l’age dans une populationde Cophosaurus texanus (Sauria, Iguanidae). Amphibia-Reptilia 3:213–219.
PATNAIK, B. K., AND H. N. BEHERA. 1981. Age determination in the tropicalagamid garden lizard, Calotes versicolor (DAUDIN), based on bonehistology. Experimental Gerontology 16:295–307.
PEREZ-BUITRAGO, N., M. A. GARCIA, A. SABAT, J. DELGADO, A. ALVAREZ, O.MCMILLAN, AND S. M. FUNK. 2008. Do headstart programs work?Survival and body condition in headstarted Mona Island iguanasCyclura cornuta stejnegeri. Endangered Species Research 6:55–65.
PILORGE, T., AND J. CASTANET. 1981. Determination l’age dans unepopulation naturelle du lezard vivipare (Lacerta vivipara Jacquin1787). Acta Oecologica 2:3–16.
RICQLES, DE A., AND V. DE BUFFRENIL. 2001. Bone histology, heterochroniesand the return of tetrapods to life in water: where are we? In J. M.Mazin and V. de Buffrenil (eds.), Secondary Adaptation of Tetrapodsto Life in Water, pp. 289–310. Proceeding of the International MeetingPoitiers, Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, Munchen, Germany.
SCHEYER, T. M., AND M. R. SANCHEZ-VILLAGRA. 2007. Carapace bonehistology in the giant pleurodiran turtle Stupendemys geographicus:phylogeny and function. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 52:137–154.
SHINE, R., AND E. L. CHARNOV. 1992. Patterns of survival, growth, andmaturation in snakes and lizards. American Naturalist 139(6):1257–1269.
TAYLOR, M. A. 2000. Functional significance of bone ballast in theevolution of buoyancy control strategies by aquatic tetrapods.Historical Biology 14:15–31.
TRILLMICH, F., AND K. G. K. TRILLMICH. 1984. The mating system of theMarine Iguana (Amblyrhynchus cristatus). Zeitschrift fur Tierpsycho-logie 63:141–172.
TRILLMICH, K. G. K., AND F. TRILLMICH. 1986. Foraging strategies of theMarine Iguana, Amblyrhynchus cristatus. Behavior, Ecology andSociobiology 18(4):259–266.
TROYER, K. 1984. Small differences in daytime body temperature affectdigestion of natural food in an herbivorous lizard (Iguana iguana).Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology (A) 87:623–626.
WERNER, D. I. 1982. Social organization and ecology of Land Iguana,Conolophus subcristatus, on Isla Fernandina, Galapagos. In G. M.Burghardt and A. S. Rand (eds.), Iguanas of the World, TheirBehavior, Ecology, and Conservation, pp. 342–365. New Series inAnimal Behavior, Ecology, Conservation and Management. NoyesPublications, Park Ridge, NJ.
———. 1983. Reproduction in the iguana Conolophus subcristatus onFernandina Island, Galapagos: clutch size and migration costs.American Naturalist 121(6):757–775.
WIENS, J. J., AND B. D. HOLLINGSWORTH. 2000. War of the iguanas:conflicting molecular and morphological phylogenies and long-branch attraction in iguanid lizards. Systematic Biology 49(1):143–159.
WIEWANDT, T. A. 1982. Evolution of nesting patterns in iguanine lizards.In G. M. Burghardt and A. S. Rand (eds.), Iguanas of the World, TheirBehavior, Ecology, and Conservation, pp. 119–141. New Series inAnimal Behavior, Ecology, Conservation and Management. NoyesPublications, Park Ridge, NJ.
WIKELSKI, M. 2005. Evolution of body size in Galapagos Marine Iguanas.Proceedings of the Royal Society B 272:1985–1993.
WIKELSKI, M., AND M. HAU. 1995. Is there an endogenous tidal foragingrhythm in Marine Iguanas? Journal of Biological Rhythms 10(4):335–350.
WIKELSKI, M., AND C. THOM. 2000. Marine Iguanas shrink to survive ElNino—changes in bone metabolism enable these adult lizards toreversibly alter their length. Nature 403:37–38.
WIKELSKI, M., AND F. TRILLMICH. 1997. Body size and sexual sizedimorphism in Marine Iguanas fluctuate as a result of opposingnatural and sexual selection: an island comparison. Evolution 51(3):922–936.
WIKELSKI, M., B. GALL, AND F. TRILLMICH. 1993. Ontogenetic changes infood intake and digestion rate of the herbivorous Marine Iguana(Amblyrhynchus cristatus, Bell). Oecologia 94:373–379.
WIKELSKI, M., V. CARRILLO, AND F. TRILLMICH. 1997. Energy limits to bodysize in a grazing reptile, the Galapagos Marine Iguana. Ecology78(7):2204–2217.
ZUG, G. R., AND A. S. RAND. 1987. Estimation of age in nesting femaleIguana iguana: testing skeletochronology in a tropical lizard.Amphibia-Reptilia 8:237–250.
Accepted: 12 October 2011.
324 J. HUGI AND M. R. SANCHEZ-VILLAGRA