Liberi v Taitz Decl of Lisa Liberi in Opp to Reed MTD Doc 391-4

8/4/2019 Liberi v Taitz Decl of Lisa Liberi in Opp to Reed MTD Doc 391-4

1/66

Declaration of Lisa Liberi 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Philip J. Berg, EsquirePennsylvania I.D. 9867

LAW OFFICES OF PHILIP J. BERG

555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531

Telephone: (610) 825-3134E-mail:[email protected] Attorney for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA,

SOUTHERN DIVISION

LISA LIBERI, et al,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

ORLY TAITZ, et al,

Defendants.

:

::::::::::::::

::

CIVIL ACTION NUMBER:8:11-cv-00485-AG (AJW)

DECLARATION OF LISA LIBERI

Date of Hearing: October 17, 2011Time of Hearing: 10:00 a.m.Location: Courtroom 10D

Declaration of Lisa Liberi

I, Lisa Liberi, am over the age of 18 and am a party to the within action. I

have personal knowledge of the facts herein, and if called to do, I could and would

competently testify. I am making this Declaration under the penalty of perjury of

the Laws of the United States pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746.

1. I have read through the Reed Defendants Motion to Dismiss. There

are numerous inconsistencies with their statements.

Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 391-4 Filed 09/25/11 Page 1 of 66 Page ID#:9395


2/66


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. I am very troubled by the Reed Defendants statement, This case

concerns and continues a venomous spat among members of a venomous political

clique. Over the last two years since May 2009, plaintiffs and certain of the

defendants have squandered the time and patience of three different United States

District Courts. This statement is located on the Reed Defendants first page of

their Brief. This disgusting statement is not true. I have never been a member of

a venomous political clique or a member of any type of political clique or

anything else political. As for the bloated statement, had the Reed Defendants

not damaged and harmed me by illegally selling my private information to Taitz

and the Sankey Defendants, to use in their threats against me, our Complaint would

not have become bloated. The Reed Defendants statement, plaintiffs and

certain of the defendants have squandered the time and patience of three different

United States District Courts is also very disgusting. I have been severely

harmed and damaged, financially and otherwise as a result of the illegal acts of the

Reed Defendants. Are they attempting to discount what has happened to me as a

result of their actions? Am I not allowed for redress for the damages and harm my

family and I have suffered? I always thought it was a Constitutional Right of mine

and goes to show you the Reed Defendants mentality when it comes to individuals

private information.



3/66


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. I have not authorized any third party to ever conduct a background

check on me; to utilize my Social Security number and other primary identifying

information; I did not authorize Neil Sankey, Todd Sankey, the Sankey Firm, Inc.,

Sankey Investigations, Inc., Orly Taitz, Yosef Taitz, Daylight Chemical

Information Systems, Inc. or Intelius, Inc. to pull any of my primary identifying

information, credit reports or any of my other private data.

4. At the time the Reed Defendants sold my reports including my Socia

Security number, date of birth, place of birth, mothers maiden name, fathers

name, address, financial data, my credit reports and other private information

[Private data] to Defendants Orly Taitz [Taitz], the Sankey Defendants and

allowed access to Yosef Taitz through Daylight Chemical Information Systems

Inc. [Daylight], I was and had been a client of LexisNexis Group, LexisNexis,

LexisNexis.com and Lexis.com. My ID assigned was F0RFPQV.

5. With my Lexis subscription, I was given a feature called People

Information and People Finder functions.

6. In 2000, my husband, son and I were placed in the California Safe at

Home program as a result of crimes committed by John Allen against my son and I. At

the same time, I was provided a new Social Security number.

7. In or about January 2009, Orly Taitz put a post on her website that all the

private data she was obtaining on President Obama and others was coming from



4/66


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LexisNexis, ChoicePoint and Intelius. See Exhibit 7 filed May 20, 2009 appearing as

Docket No. 190 and 190-3.

8. On or about March 18, 2009, I had a Lexis report on myself. See EXHIBIT

1. The report appeared to be accurate; it had my address, my name, date of birth and

Social Security number as notated. It did not combine my old and new Social Security

number either.

9. On or about April 17, 2009, I received a call on my cell phone from

Evelyn Adams. I had just left a doctor appointment and it happened to be snowing

Mrs. Adams was very upset. Mrs. Adams stated Orly Taitz had placed on her

website; by mass emailing, a copy of which she (Mrs. Adams) had received; and

put it out all over the Internet, on third party websites asking everyone to publish

Orly Taitz documents, which Orly Taitz called Dossier No. 6. Mrs. Adams

informed me that Orly Taitzs Dossier No. 6 contained my Social Security number

date of birth, address, husbands name, husbands Social Security number,

husbands date of birth, a print-out which Orly Taitz was calling my criminal

record and other private information. Mrs. Adams informed me she was emailing

me a copy.

10. When I returned home, I had several emails with Taitzs Dossier No

6. I was horrified. Copies of Dossier No. 6 have been filed numerous times, the

most recent being May 20, 2011. See Exhibits E and F, pages 41-75 appearing

as Docket No. [DN] 83 filed July 28, 2009; DNs 106 through 106-12 filed



5/66


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

August 25, 2009; DNs 107 through 107-10 filed August 26, 2009; and Exhibits

13, 14, 49, and 54, DNs 190, 190-3, 190-4, 190-9 and 190-10 filed May 20, 2011.

11. Thereafter, Orly Taitz began publishing my mothers maiden name

place of birth, date of birth, fathers name, Social Security number, address, and

other private data. Taitz had now published all over the Internet, sent

internationally, sent by mass emailing and my primary identifying information. See

DNs 190 through 190-27 filed May 20, 2011.

12. On or about May 9, 2009, Orly Taitz began posting on her website

and all over the Internet that she obtained the addresses, Social Security numbers

and other data from LexisNexis, ChoicePoint, and Intelius. See EXHIBIT 2.

13. After Taitzs publications of my private data, in or about June 2009, I

ran a Lexis Report on myself. This report showed another individual using my

Social Security number in Texas. See DN 66, pages 32-37 filed with the Court

June 23, 2009.

14. In September 2009, Orly Taitz began using the Courts Docketing

System to further publish my private data. Taitz filed her Dossier No. 6 in this

Court before Judge David O. Carter in the case ofBarnett, et al v. Obama, et al

Case No. SACV 09-0082 DOC (Anx). Mr. Berg sent a letter to Judge Carter

asking him to please Seal Exhibit 7 of Taitzs filing as it contained my Social

Security number improperly redacted. Judge Carter issued a Minute Order



6/66


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Sealing Taitzs Exhibit 7 as it contained Social Security numbers of me, my date

of birth, my husbands name, Social Security number and date of birth improperly

redacted. See EXHIBIT 3.

15. Taitz than began publishing on her website, all over the Internet; and

sending by mass email, including Internationally, that I was using numerous

names, and putting out the names she claimed I was using, stating I was using

different dates of birth and Social Security numbers, etc. See DNs 190 through

190-27.

16. In or about February 2010, I conducted a search on myself through

my Lexis Account. I found my Lexis background had completely changed. Lexis

now had both my old and new Social Security numbers linked together; Lexis had

me using names, Social Security numbers and year of birth that had never been

mine and never used by me. See EXHIBIT 4 and see the following:

INCORRECT INCORRECT INCORRECT

NAMES: SOCIAL SECURITY: YEAR OF BIRTH:

Liberi, Lisa A 563-42-xxxx 1967CourvilleRichar, Lisa R 563-72-xxxx

Courville, Lisa RichardsonCourville Richardson, Lisa O.

CourvilleRichardson, LisaCourvilleRichardson, Lisa O.

Courville, Lisa O.

Courviller, Lisa

Courville, Richardson LCourville, Richardso L



7/66


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

And others. It also showed my new and old Social Security numbers being used

by multiple people. See EXHIBIT 4. Ironically, my Lexis file now matched

that of Orly Taitz allegations about me, it had been changed to match Orly Taitzs

false statements about me, since I had run my own files, and what was appearing

and matching on reports from Defendant Intelius in my name. During these

searches I also ran Plaintiff Lisa Ostella and her husband at their request. I ran one

of the wrong Social Security numbers appearing on my file as being used by me

which had been changed, and it happens to be that of my deceased sister.

17. On October 27, 2010 and November 1, 2010, I sent several letters to

the Reed Defendants requesting copies of my reports; informing them of the

incorrect information maintained in my files; and requesting to be opted out. I

never received one response, nor did I receive one report. I sent several of the

Lexis and Accurint applications with my Drivers License and a utility bill, as they

required, to the following:

Lexisnexis Risk Solutions, Inc.Accurint Consumer Inquiry Department

P.O. Box 105610Atlanta, GA 30348-5610

Sent Letters on: October 27, 2010 by Certified Mail ReturnReceipt Requested 7007 2680 0000 7808 8814

Signed for by: Robert Plourde on November 1,

2010

October 27, 2010 by Certified Mail Return

Receipt Requested 7007 2680 0000 7808 8807



8/66


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Signed for by: Robert Plourde on November 1,2010

November 1, 2010 by Priority Mail

Delivery Confirmation 0309 3220 0001 9214 5498

November 1, 2010 by Priority MailDelivery Confirmation 0309 3220 0001 9214 5467

And

LexisNexis Consumer CenterAttn: Full File Disclosure

P.O. Box 105108Atlanta, GA 30348-5108

Sent Letters on: November 1, 2010 by Priority Mail


November 1, 2010 by Priority Mail


18. On or about February 28, 2010, Mr. Berg sent a letter to the Reed

Defendants regarding their illegal selling of my private data to Orly Taitz, Sankey

Defendants and making my information available to Yosef Taitz.

19. I checked my file again on March 31, 2010, a little over a month since

Mr. Berg sent the letter to Lexis. I was looking to see if they had corrected the

wrong information in my file. See EXHIBIT 5, nothing had been corrected. I

also found that my Lexis log in details were not encrypted as Lexis was Court

Ordered by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to do.



9/66


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

20. As you can see from my reports attached hereto, the reports from the

Reed Defendants are notpublic record reports.

21. Mr. Berg was contacted by Linda Clark, Sr. Corporate Counsel

LexisNexis Risk and Information Analytics Group, Inc. During this phone call

Mrs. Clark learned I had a Lexis Account. On March 26, 2010, Mr. Berg sent a

letter to Ms. Clark confirming their conversation.

22. On April 12, 2010, I was signed into my Lexis Account doing some

case searches for a school assignment. All of a sudden, I was kicked out of my

account. I attempted to sign back into my Lexis Account, but was blocked. I

received a message that my account was deactivated and that I had to contact

LexisNexis. See EXHIBIT 6. I immediately called LexisNexis and spoke with

a representative that gave me Brian Lomaxs name and stated I had to speak with

Brian Lomax, Telephone Research Analyst, (800) 227-9597, Ext. 58004. I was

transferred to Mr. Lomaxs voicemail and I left a message.

23. On or about April 15, 2011, approximately three [3] days later, I

received a phone message from Brian Lomax. Brian Lomax stated they had reason

to believe someone else was utilizing my account and that my account had been

compromised.

24. I called Mr. Lomax back and left him a message stating no one had been

using my account except me, that I was signed into the account when it was inactivated,



10/66


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

and I was not notified by Lexis or anyone. In the message I included my email address

[email protected]. I did not receive a return call from Mr. Lomax, but instead I

received an email which included new log-in details for my Lexis account. See

EXHIBIT 7.

25. I responded to Mr. Lomax and asked if I should report this to my loca

authorities. See EXHIBIT 8. I received another email from Mr. Lomax stating

the new account should solve the problem and if it occurs again, then Lexis wil

take further action. See EXHIBIT 9.

26. When I signed into my Lexis Account with my new log-in details, al

of my searches had been deleted from my account.

27. There had been continued letters and communication between Mr

Berg, Linda Clark, Jennifer Jung and LexisNexis. Mr. Berg received a letter from

Jennifer Jung on or about May 6, 2010 regarding a Subpoena that had been served

on Lexis. See EXHIBIT 10. Mr. Berg sent another letter to LexisNexis on May

10, 2011. A conference call was set by Jennifer Jung and Linda Clark for May 19,

28. Approximately five [5] days after Mr. Berg and Linda Clarks

conversation, I attempted to use my public record search, or what Lexis calls

public records. I was unable to access it, I was completely blocked. I also found

many of my searches had again been deleted by Lexis. See EXHIBIT 11.

confirmed by the process server who personally served it.

2010. The subpoena was served on Reed at the address listed in Lexis and was



11/66


12/66


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

32. Tammy also stated I was to call Jennifer Jung, Esquire with Lexis Legal

Department at (800) 543-6162. Jennifer Jung, Esquire was well aware I was represented

by Mr. Berg and Ms. Jungs attempt to use the school to have me contact her was

extremely unethical. Ms. Jung cancelled and refused to reinstate my account and the

false statements from Jennifer Jung to my school were out of retaliation for my legitimate

complaints against Lexis through my attorney as to what had happened to me. It was also

to ensure they deleted my search criteria, spoilage of evidence.

33. I have never utilized my Lexis Account for Commercial purposes. And

even if I had, which I had not, why did it matter? There was nothing precluding me from

using my account commercially should I have chosen to. Nothing was in my welcome

letters from Lexis or Blackstone about using my account, and Lexis did not change their

website to reflect statements that school accounts were not to be used commercially until

approximately the end of 2010, after all the above had occurred.

34. When it was time to file suit against Lexis, Mr. Berg asked me to contact

Lexis legal department and verify the accuracy of the company names and agent for

process of service in Los Angeles, California, which I did.

35. On or about June 16, 2011, I called Lexis Legal Department at (937) 865-

7553. I received this number from Lexis in Ohio. Melinda Meeks answered the

telephone. I explained to Ms. Meeks that I needed to verify the company names of Reed

Elsevier, Inc. and LexisNexis as well as the Agent for Process of Service for each of the

Divisions of Reed.



13/66


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

36. Ms. Meeks stated I had the names incorrect. Ms. Meeks stated

ChoicePoint, Inc. was actually LexisNexis ChoicePoint, Inc.; Accurint was Seisint, Inc

d/b/a Accurint; that LexisNexis was LexisNexis, Inc.; that LexisNexis Group was in fact

LexisNexis Group, Inc. Ms. Meeks further stated that these Companys were to be

served through CT Corporation, 818 W. 7th Street, Los Angeles, CA 90017. Ms

Meeks stated that LexisNexis Risk and Information Analytics Group, Inc. was the

correct name, but this division had to be served through CT Corporation, 1201

Peach Tree, Atlanta, GA 30361. I thanked Ms. Meeks and sent her a confirmation

email of the information she had provide me. See EXHIBIT 15.

37. On June 17, 2011, I received an email back from Ms. Meeks stating

some of the companies listed she was not familiar with so she was working with

Counsel to ensure she gave me the correct information. See EXHIBIT 16. I

responded to Ms. Meeks and asked her which companies were in question. See

EXHIBIT 17.

38. I received another response from Mindy Meeks advising that all

Lexis/Reed companies were to be served through CT Corporation and not Georgia

See EXHIBIT 18. Ms. Meeks did not make any further corrections to the

company names she had provided me.



14/66


15/66


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 EXHIBIT 1



16/66

Page 1

Search:

Terms: ssn(622-19-4312) state(ALL) radius(30)

No. Full Name Address/Phone SSN

1. LIBERI, LISA R

LIBERI, L

LIBERI, LISA R

2983 PLAZA BLANCASANTA FE, NM 87507-6518SANTA FE COUNTY

990 CYPRESS STATION DR APT 303HOUSTON, TX 77090-1546HARRIS COUNTY(07/2009-Current)

910 CYPRESS STATION DR APTHOUSTON, TX 77090-1502HARRIS COUNTY(03/2009-10/2009)

6018 SPRING CREEK LNSPRING, TX 77379-8805HARRIS COUNTY(2005-09/2009)

281-320-1006Phone may be disconnected

281-257-0291COOK MARIAN(Current Listing Name)

281-251-8423Phone may be disconnected

8902 ARCADIANHOUSTON, TX 77088HARRIS COUNTY(02/2006-04/2007)

375 BALDWIN PYKATY, TX 77449

HARRIS COUNTY(11/2006-03/2007)

13800 ELLA BLVD APT A201HOUSTON, TX 77014-3318HARRIS COUNTY(03/2003-01/2007)281-874-9560ALLEN TIFFANY

(CA 2000)

Link ID:000518753502

(DOB: 05/1965)622-19-XXXX

Locate a Person (Nationwide) Search Non-regulated

Copyright 2009 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Date/Time: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 1:17 PM

4312) state(ALL) radius(30)Terms: ssn(622-19-Search: Locate a Person (Nationwide) Search Non-regulated

(Age: 43)

Exb. "1", pg. 1



17/66


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 EXHIBIT 2

17



18/66

Home

Appeal of Carter Case

Quo Warranto Filed and Served

Dr. Orly Taitz Esquire

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation 29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, ste 100, Rancho

Santa Margarita CA, 92688 Copyright 2010

World's Leading Obama Eligibility Challenge Web Site

Your donations to the cause are much appreciated.

PayPal - The safer, easier way to pay

online!

Make a donation to Dr. Orly Taitz for CA Secretary of State 2010

Campaign

The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers, do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, ESQ, and Dr. Taitz, ESQ has no means of

checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.

Information update on both Liberi and Obama

Posted on | May 9, 2009 | 8 Comments

Submitted on 2009/05/09 at 5:09am

His last postings on his site:

THE LATEST

01/02/2009: PRESS RELEASE Philip J. Berg, Esquire Obtained the Obama 1964 Divorce File

1 6/2/2010

rmation update on both Liberi and Obama | Dr. Orly Taitz Esquire

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=834

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/

http://investigatingobama.blogspot.com/2009/05/taitz.html

Exb. "2", pg.



19/66

01/02/09: BERG files a lawsuit on behalf of a RETIRED COLONEL The lawsuit is an Interpleader

that shifts the burden of proof to OBAMA Further, OBAMA is named as BARRY SOETORO as

that is his real name when he was legally adopted in Indonesia

01/02/09: The latest in the Berg vs. Obama Case No. 08 570 is that there are two conferences

scheduled; one for January 9, 2009 to hear the Petition for Writ of Certiorari and the other for January

16, 2009 to hear the Petition for Injunction.

I got this information. Beginning of January was the last time there was any info posted on Bergs site.

By the way, Berg and Lisa Liberi got Dunham-Soetoro divorce papers from me and they got Dunham-Obama

divorce papers from Ed Hale.

Prior to the electoral vote I tried to file a legal action on behalf of the electors, to get verification of Obamas

eligibility. I got in touch with some attorneys in Conservative red states and asked them to file with me and

sign Pro Hac Vice- it is a form that allows an out of state attorney to work together with the in state

attorney. I Worked with an attorney in AL, Keith Cornett and later Ben Dupre, associate of Moral law center,

that is ran by former Chief Justice of Al Supreme Court Rory Moore. I studied all of Al elections statutes and

Keith Cornett filed a request in HI to get Dunham divorce papers. When he couldnt get them, I got in touch

with attorney Jim Hochberg in HI and he personally went to the court house and got the Dunham -Soetoro

papers. I e-mailed Berg and stated that I got these divorce papers and would like to know if they want them,

since it can help both cases. Berg asked me to e-mail them and later Lisa Liberi called and asked to mail a

hard copy.

Dunham-Obama divorce papers were obtained by Ed Hale, who paid a private investigator to go to HI and

obtain the copy.

I never asked for any credit. Many of you read my blog and you could see that I didnt even mentionhundreds and hundreds of hours Ive spent trying to bring an action on behalf of electors, who would have a

better standing. At the end we could not file such action in AL, since the statutes were amorphous, it wasnt a

strong hook, however Mr. Robert Cusanelli, an elector from AL, who actually voted in the 2008 electoral

college, became one of my plaintiffs. Now you know how much work was done in conjunction with this one

plaintiff, one out of over a 100.

Considering all the work that I have done, the allegations coming from Berg, are just outrageous and hurtful. I

believe a lot of what Berg is doing now is related to some criminal issues involving Lisa Liberi. I got

information from one of the people that worked with Berg and Lisa Liberi, whereby Lisa Liberi stated that

she gets disability payments from social security and those payments were paid by Berg to her husband, so

that she can continue receiving disability payments. I decided to check this matter and called James Secord-District Attorney of San Bernardino county in CA, who prosecuted Lisa Liberi, when she got 8 years in jail

for grand theft and forgery and this jail term was stayed and reduced to probation and restitution, supposedly

because of her medical disability. Mr. Secord has confirmed all of the information in regards to her

conviction and stated that she is indeed getting disability payments from the government. If Berg is paying her

for her services and it is done in any form: check or cash or indirectly through her husband, it is a very serious

offense for both of them. I would like to find as much information, as I possibly can in regards to this matter.

If you have donated to Berg, where did the donation go? I believe, Berg filed this frivolous action to keep

everybody quiet about Lisa Liberis past and her current actions. Another matter, that I am trying to

ascertain, where does she get the restitution that she owes to the victims of her felonious activities in CA. If

1 6/2/2010

mation update on both Liberi and Obama | Dr. Orly Taitz Esquire

Exb. "2", pg.



20/66

you read dossier #6, you can see that the total restitution is $21,000 per month. Possibly it was reduced to12,000 per month. Where is this money coming from? If she is on disability and her husband is working at a

factory, where do they get this kind of money? This is a catch 22. If she is not paying restitution, she issupposed to go back to jail and serve her 8 year term. If she is paying this restitution and she is paid by Berg,then there are two very serious problems:

a. she is working with donations and other peoples credit cards, which means she is violating her probationand supposed to go back to jail. Berg should not be allowing her to be anywhere near the donations

b. If she is getting any payments from Berg, while getting disability, that is fraud and she is supposed to go

back to jail and is supposed to be prosecuted on these additional charges.

Her probation officer is Dawn Hellwig. Another officer in the department, who is familiar with the case isJohanne Martinez. If you have given any donations to the offices of Phil Berg, you need to contact Dawn

Hellwig and demand an answer. I need to know if there are any volunteers, who live in Santa Fe.

There is another issue. Did somebody arrange for her to be associated with Berg, to get him into serious legaltrouble. Was this arranged to begin with? I discovered an interesting detail and need your help in getting to

the bottom of this.

Liberi was first arrested in Rancho Cucomanga Ca, being involved in financial fraud schemes going back to2001-20o2. When I looked at the name of the town, I remembered, that among 130 jobs for Barack Obama

and Michelle Obama, there was one notation: Michelle Obama working for Muslim World Today inRancho Cucomanga, CA. (dossier #1)I remember being surprised,since Obamas claim to be Christian. As Ive written in dossier #7, this currentposition was recently erased with 110 other positions and I demanded investigation in this destruction of

evidence affair. Of Course Holder did nothing so far.

Another parallel. According to District attorney Secord, Liberi has changed her social security number severaltimes and now she applied for yet another SS number.

If you recall in dossier #1, I provided 100 addresses around the country for Obama that are connected to 25different social security numbers.

Liberi has changed her last name. Her name was Corvelle and Richardson. For some reason she and her

husband suddenly took the name Liberi. According to the private investigator, the husbands last name wasBrent McCormick.

By the way, her social security number is a public knowledge, not only because of her conviction for grand

theft and forgery, but also because of her bankruptcies. According to the private investigator, Mr. Sankey,there are 4 bankruptcy filings done by her: one -under Richardson, one under Corvelle and two under

Liberi. This information is readily available to 5 billion people on the planet, who have access to Internet,

which makes Bergs case for injunction totally frivolous.

I need all the information, that can be found in regards to criminal convictions for her and her husband. I need

to know all of their associations, particularly in Rancho Cucomanga CA.

There are Internet services, that can give you a printout of web sites, as they were a month ago or a year ago.These are crawlers, that scan the Internet. One of them is Internet Access Wayback Machine. There are

other similar services. I need your help in getting info in both directions:

a. all of the names, addresses, social, associates, convictions, incarcerations for Liberi. Any and all info on herhusband. You can see past recordings on the Wayback machine.

1 6/2/2010


Exb. "2", pg.



21/66

I was asked, How do they get those addresses? It is all coming from public records: non-profit organizations,

their donations records, county recordings, real estate recordings, probate records of the deceased (do you

remember that Madeline Dunham, Obamas grandmother was a volunteer for the probate department of Oahu

circuit court), disclosed salaries (if you recall, recently Washington DC FBI has raided offices of Vivek

Kundra, Obamas chief of computer security and arrested his assistant amidst allegations of creating bogusjob positions and splitting salaries). We need to find the connections: who and when created those fraudulent

units and who and when erased them.

I need help from patriots, who are in law inforcement, such as Police, Sheriff, FBI, Marshall, DA , Border

Patrol, military police. Most importantly in CA, NM, PA, Il and DC.

Category:Dossiers, HOT ITEMS!, Latest News, Uncategorized

Tags:Berg litigation >birth certificate > eligibility > natural born citizen > obama > orly > taitz

Comments

8 Responses to Information update on both Liberi and Obama

NeverGiveUp

May 9th, 2009 @ 10:18 am

This is the address for his site: http://www.obamacrimes.info/ I sincerely appreciate all you do Dr.

Taitz!

1.

cq

May 9th, 2009 @ 11:47 am

Andy Martin says bErg is a double agent

http://www.pr-inside.com/the-strange-behavior-of-philadelphia-lawyer-r908429.htm

2.

Jon

Orly:

I see a couple of possibilities why Berg might be attacking you. First, he is obviously jealous at how

much farther you have gotten in your attempts to expose this fraud Obama than he did. His only

purpose was to discredit Obama and get Hillary elected, pure and simple.

Second possibility is that he has either been paid off, or threatened by this scandalous Obama regime to

keep you occupied defending yourself against Bergs legal action, instead of working on the task at

hand to expose Obama. Either of these reasons show the type of person Phillip Berg really is, which

when we look at one simple fact, that he is a Democrat, explains everything!

We are behind you Dr Orly, so keep the fight going against this anit-American plauge now occupying

our White House. Fight on!!!

3.

1 6/2/2010


b. any and all info on those 100 addresses and 25 social security numbers for Obama and 130 job positions for

Obamas . When did those appear in databases and when were those erased?

May 9th, 2009 @ 12:07 pm

Exb. "2", pg.



22/66


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 EXHIBIT 3

22



23/66

Case 8:09-cv-00082-DOC-AN Document 77 Filed 09/30/2009 Page 1 of 5

Exb. "3", pg. 23



24/66


Exb. "3", pg. 24



25/66


Exb. "3", pg. 2



26/66


Exb. "3", pg. 2



27/66


Exb. "3", pg.



28/66


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 EXHIBIT 4

28



29/66

Switch Client Preferences Sign Out Help

My Lexis Search Research Tasks Get a Document Shepard's Alerts Total Litigator Transactional Advisor

c Records Search https://w3.lexis.com/research2/pubrec/searchpr.do?_m=ecb4662

2/19/2010

Exb. "4", pg. 2



30/66


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 EXHIBIT 5

30



31/66

https://w3.lexis.com/research2/h

istory/reaccess.do?answersetHandle=&answerset

ClientId=&answersetCreateTime=1270082553&ssb=0_

691609679&featureId=

prma&globalId=F0RFPQV_

00_

LDC&searchHistEventId=909547040&solutionId=ldc&_

md5=22e246aeb2c112f8ea83de964a323721

log-indetailswerenotencrypted.

Inthebelowl

ink,youcanseeF0RFPQV,thiswasLisaLiberi'slog-

inI.D.showing

Exb. "5", pg. 31



32/66

Exb. "5", pg. 32



33/66


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 EXHIBIT 6

33



34/66

Yourpasswordc

annotbechangedbecauseyouraccountisinactive.

PleasecontactCustomerSupportat

1-800-543-6862.

IDI

nactive

Return

to

Sign-in

AboutLexisN

exis

Terms&Conditions

Copyright2

010LexisNexis.

Allrightsreserved.

1

of1

4/12/20104:58PM

Lexis

ID:

F0RFPQV

Mrs.

Liberica

lle

dthea

bovenu

mberan

dwas

tolds

henee

de

dtosp

ea

kw

ithBrian

Lomaxa

t(800)227-95

97

,Ex

t.58004

.

To

ddwasuna

bletotellMrs.L

iberiw

hy

heraccoun

twas

inac

tiva

ted

.Mrs.

Liberi

leftamessage

for

Brian

Lomaxon

4/12/2010

.

Brian

Lomax

'stitle

istelep

hone

Researc

hAna

lys

t.

To

ddinforme

dMrs.

Liberi

that

hewasunawarew

hy

heraccoun

twa

sinac

tiva

tedtha

the

didno

thaveacc

ess

forsome

reason.

Exb. "6", pg. 34



35/66


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28EXHIBIT 7

35



36/66

From: Lomax, Brian D. (LNG-DAY)

Date: Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:44 PM

Subject: Lexis NexisTo: [email protected]

Lisa,

Below is your new ID and Password. ID sharing is prohibited by Lexis and I ask that you

be the only one that uses this. Once you sign in for the first time, the system will haveyou change your password to whatever you like. As always, please let me know if you

have any questions or concerns.

User Id - FRT45HD Password - RC5NYN

NEW Lexis for Microsoft - Click HERE to view the Video (WMV)

Brian D. Lomax

Account Manager/Legal Consultant

PH: 1-800-227-9597 Ext: 58004

Email: [email protected]

Fax: 1-866-960-2592

www.lexisnexis.com

Helping you achieve excellence in the business and practice of law!

Exb. "7", pg. 36



37/66


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 EXHIBIT 8

37



38/66

From: Lisa Liberi


Subject: Re: Lexis NexisTo: "Lomax, Brian D. (LNG-DAY)"

Brian,

Thank you for prompt response. I do not share my log in details and am a bit confused.

As stated to you, I was in Lexis and was signed out when I called to find out whatoccurred. I spoke to Todd in your Customer Service/Tech support at the number

provided when I could not log back in. Was someone else signed in to my account?

Never had this happen before, should I be reporting this to my local law enforcement?

Thank you.

Respectfully,

Lisa Liberi

Exb. "8", pg. 3



39/66


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 EXHIBIT 9

39



40/66



Subject: RE: Lexis NexisTo: Lisa Liberi

Lisa,

With the new ID and password, this will prevent this from happening in the future. Letsleave as is and if this happens again, then we will take the appropriate action.


Brian D. Lomax


PH: 1-800-227-9597 Ext: 58004


Fax: 1-866-960-2592

www.lexisnexis.com


Exb. "9", pg. 4



41/66


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 EXHIBIT 10

41



42/66Exb. "10", pg. 4



43/66


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 EXHIBIT 11

43



44/66

Exb. "11", pg. 44



45/66


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28EXHIBIT 12

45



46/66

From: Lisa Liberi [mailto:[email protected]]

Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 9:40 PM

To: Lomax, Brian D. (LNG-DAY)Cc: Phil

Subject: My Account

Mr. Lomax,

Re: FRT45HD

Would you please explain to me why my Public Records Search was removed and whysome of my previous searches have now been removed? It has been part of my package

since I obtained Lexis and it is creating me problems.

I would appreciate a prompt reply.

Respectfully,

--

Lisa Liberi

Assistant to Philip J. BergLAW OFFICES OF PHILIP J. BERG

555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12

Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531Ph: (610) 825-3134

Fx: (610) 834-7659

Exb. "12", pg. 46



47/66


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 EXHIBIT 13

47



48/66


Date: Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:24 AMSubject: RE: My Account

To: Lisa Liberi

Cc: Phil

Lisa,

I hope all is well. Looking at your account, your ID is under Direct Learning Systems,

which is a paralegal school. Your ID was not supposed to have access to Public Recordsto begin with. There seems to be some issues with this account. Corporate is currently

looking into this and as soon as I hear something from them, I will get back to you

immediately. Thank you for your patience and understanding.


Brian D. Lomax


PH: 1-800-227-9597 Ext: 58004


Fax: 1-866-960-2592

www.lexisnexis.com


Exb. "13", pg. 4



49/66


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28EXHIBIT 14

49



50/66Exb. "14", pg. 5



51/66Exb. "14", pg. 5



52/66

LexisNexis Paralegal Community:: The Paralegal Update:: Using LexisNexis:: Content Spotlight

Content Spotlight

Access the entire LexisNexis collection of jury verdicts and settlements---simultaneously

Now you can access our entire comprehensive collection of jury verdict and settlement content through one

sourcethe recently-created Mega Jury Verdicts & Settlements (Including IDEX

) group source on

lexis.com. You can access this source from the Expert Witness Analysis, Jury Verdicts & Settlements section

on the main legal tab oflexis.com.

More court documents at lexis.com for better case strategies

LexisNexis now provides seamless access to the largest, most comprehensive collection of court dockets and

documents in the industry, nearly 100 million in total. Use this convenient resource to uncover facts and arguments

quickly and refine your winning case strategies in less time.

Discover exactly what happened before the opinion was released!

Learn how litigation teams in similar cases have argued their positions. Find drafting templates specifically tailored

to particular situations. Investigate experts, judges, opponents, and more with the LexisNexis

Briefs, Pleadings &

Motions collection of nearly one million significant filings.

Now you're just a click away from the largest, most comprehensive collection of expert witness information!

Based on feedback from customers like you, all of the critical LexisNexis

expert witness content that you used to

see within the Briefs, Motions, Pleadings and Jury Verdicts section of the lexis.com

menu now appears on a

single new page.Intellectual property resources: LexisNexis covers the globe better--with more options

The challenge? Protect valuable intellectual property assets. LexisNexis offers a full suite of solutions for creating

and protecting patents with efficiency and confidence.

More cellular phone numbers--56 million--now in LexisNexis public records

Cell phone use has reached a critical mass. In some states, researchers estimate that 25 percent of households

rely on cell phoneswithout land lines. Even in households with traditional land lines, more people are using a cell

phone number as their primary contact number. So finding and tracking hard-to-locate people via these numbers

may be a good option. The Alternate Phone Numbers source gives you a variety of helpful information.

Improve case outcomes by improving your expert witness research

LexisNexis offers more expert witness resources than any other provider!

You know the outcome of a case can ride on an experts credibility or lack thereof. Thats why you mustuncover

the strengths and weaknesses of any expert involved in your case. To help ensure that your expert witness

research is as thorough and as accurate as possible and that you dont waste time doing it, LexisNexis

provides

access to the largest, most comprehensive collection of expert witness informationpublished and unpublished,

public and privateavailable anywhere. And tools to help you use that information effectively.

Identify opportunities, mitigate risks in client transactionsIts easier with LexisNexis real property enhancements

Real property information and valuation tools are crucial across practice areas for a variety of transactions. In the

volatility and uncertainty of the current economic crisis, theres an even greater need for resources to help your firm

counsel your clients in m aking informed decisions, minimizing risk, and maximizing opportunities when

real property is involved. Why turn to lexis.com

for your real property information and risk assessment needs?

Reliable expert opinion: 1,400 Elsevier Full-Text Journals now at lexis.com

When legal matters require scientific theory, expert opinionor even an inside look at companies operating in

scientific or medical industriesdo you search the Web? When 30 million scientific professionals need a reliable

opinion, they turn to Elsevier Full-Text Journals. Now a comprehensive 1,400 Elsevier Full-Text Journal collection

is available at lexis.com

.

IDEX Expert Witness Collection Coming to lexis.com

More than one million records on 200,000-plus experts are joining the lexis.com lineup of expert witness

information.

Do You Know What Major Law Changes Today?

The answer is at Legislative Impacts & Regulatory Impacts at lexis.com. Track amendments and legislativehistory foreveryfederal law and monitor 21 states laws. What about regulations?OK. Check how the Federal

Registerimpacts every CFR section from 2003. And dont forget to check regulatory impact for 25 states. See how

and get downloadable search tips free.

Craft Winning Litigation Arguments and Dive Deep into Due Diligence

Take the plunge! Get a unique combination of dockets and court-filed documents that prepare you and your

attorneys far beyond the information found in reported and unreported decisions.

It's Always Good to Know What the Experts Have to Say

With the value of expert analysis in mind, weve added some very useful content to the LexisNexis

services. Read

on to learn more about LexisNexis

Expert Commentaries and LexisNexis

Expert Witness Transcripts.

Looking for a new research assistant? Try LexisNexis Case in Brief

A significant timesaving research tool, LexisNexis

Case in Brief is a detailed, expanded analysis of an

important/significant case. It provides a comprehensive collection of online content related to a case, wrapping

together all of the important information into one location with links to the related content aimed at reducing your

research time.

Time-Consuming Research Tasks Made Much Easier

We know there are those research tasks you dread, the ones that can drag on and on or the ones that require

munity Portal http://law.lexisnexis.com/communityportal/articles/default.aspx?g

5/28/2010 1

http://law.lexisnexis.com/communityportal/articles/default.aspx?g=QfsTyLJ1USs=&c=id7twaN0z8w=

Exb. "14", pg.



53/66

Time-Consuming Research Tasks Made Much Easier

We know there are those research tasks you dread, the ones that can drag on and on or the ones that require

information that can be hard to locate. Now LexisNexis offers some new materials to help make your work life

much easier.

Background Research on People Can Uncover Unexpected Nuggets of Information

How do you catch people when they lie about their past? Thorough background research is a good place to start!

LexisNexis v. the Internet -- There's Really No Comparison

Conquer information overload with LexisNexis News, Business & Public RecordsMore news & business sources

More public records Simple searching and reviewing techniques.

Sign On or Register now for full access...free of charge!

Bookmark this si te now...for quick access to resources that can help you succeed.


5/28/2010 1

Exb. "14", pg.



54/66

LexisNexis Paralegal Community:: The Paralegal Update:: Using LexisNexis:: Product Spotlight

Product Spotlight

Soon you can take advantage of the groundbreaking integration of Lexis and Microsoft Office

Youll be able to experience seamless access to LexisNexis

content, the open Web, and your own firm or company

files from within applications you use every dayMicrosoft

Word, Outlook

and SharePoint

. Youll be able to find

relevant insights and answers more quickly by staying within Word or Outlook as you create and review documents

and e-mails with Lexis

forMicrosoft Office. Your focus will remain on achieving the outcome you wantwhether

youre concentrating on legal matters or responding to client issues and questions.

Notice anything different about the LexisNexis Public Records collection?

You may have picked up on some changes as youve performed public records research over the past few months

or so. If not, or if you want to know more, were providing a few details.

Now all case-law searches uncover even more!

Now allstate and federal case-law searches at lexis.com

reach deeper and compile vital insights to help you and

your legal researchers better understand the true impact of a case. LexisNexis Related Content has expanded its

analysis coverage to include all 50 states back to beginning of reporting as well as complete federal

coverage .

Mitigate risks, reduce penalties, and help protect your company

For companies and compliance professionals, stakes are high and compliance risks continue to grow, fueled by

globalization, the escalating pace and increasing complexity of new regulations, stricter enforcement, and risingfines. Its important to monitorlegal changes and business trends, structure policies and processes according to

industry standards, identify and track incidents and exposures, and provide a corporate view of compliance.

LexisNexis offers cutting-edge compliance tools, world-class regulatory intelligence and content, and access to

industry-leading compliance expertsa robust combination that yields a unique compliance package available from

no other provider.

Manage case facts and issues more effectively

CaseMap

Fact & Issue Management Tool, a central repository for critical case knowledge, can be used to

organize information about the key facts, documents, cast of characters, issues, and case law in every matter.

CaseMap makes it easy to capture and manage these case details andto use them to create practical, polished

work product that promotes collaboration and communication between members of the litigation team.

Your work stays organized for quick, secure access with Lexis Document Profiling

Across your firm, model documents provide a solid foundation for effective, profitable work. But documents in a

large system can become disorganized quickly and easily. Misclassified files can be hard to find. And theres no

time for laborious searching. More than ever before, each document collection needs a sound structure, strong

security and true document findability.Your firm gets just that with LexisDocument Profiling.

Save time spent creating e-newsletters

Do you or does someone in your firm spend a significant amount of time putting together electronic newsletters to

share internally? LexisNexis

Clipper powered by Ozmosys

could be the answer. Its the ideal current-awareness solution that fits any firms needs to create and distribute timely, stylized newsletters.

Enrich your content and enhance your search capability with Lexis Search Advantage

Often, your first step when dealing with a new matter is to do some research within your firms internal documents.

So how do you know that this research is providing comprehensive results? That its finding existing pleading,

depositions, memos, deal documents, and motions written by in-firm experts as well as other types of information

maintained by the firm? That its looking for information in e-mail and Web sites? A document management system

(DMS) doesnt provide this kind of enterprise-wise search capability. Think Lexis Search Advantage. Read more

Your firm can incorporate vital company, industry, and executive information on its intranet site with LexisNexis

Dossier Publishing Manager

You can now take reports from LexisNexis

Dossier Suite and include them on your own site, or include a link to a

report in an e-mail, a PDF document, or a Microsoft

Word or PowerPoint

document. These reports will update

automatically so that your site always contains the most up-to-date data. Dossier Publishing Manager helps you

share vital business intelligence within your organization.

Have you noticed changes to the LexisNexis Public Records interface?

Tap into searching power that was difficult (or impossible) to achieve with words and connectors. Two words:Search Forms. Great for novice searchersjust fill in the blanks. (Your technophobes may even try it.) It gives you

more ways to find more information.

Finally! Free Web Content Without Irrelevant Hits

New Lexis

Webnow available to you in betaserves up free Web content from legal-specific sites. And get

dynamite filtering tools that pinpoint legal research faster and better than any other search engine available.

It's Lurking in the E-Mail! Capture it!

Only a few CDs of electronic filese-mail folders and electronic documentscan complicate your life and slow

down your ability to conduct timely discovery. So get some help. Convert, search, locateand discover! (And its

just about that fast.)

LexisNexis Batch Solutions

When your cases involve collections, bankruptcy, class-action litigation, debt buying or product liability, you may

need to update hundreds of addresses and phone numbers, send mass mailings, or quickly find information on a

large number of individuals, businesses or assets. Save time and gain comprehensive results cost-effectively with

precise, automated LexisNexis Batch Solutions.

Want to be Confident in Your Investigations?

With the newest release of LexisNexis Public Records, Weve improved accuracy, enhanced ease of use, and


5/28/2010 1

http://law.lexisnexis.com/communityportal/articles/default.aspx?g=QfsTyLJ1USs=&c=DzYl9UQ37t0=

Exb. "14", pg. 54



55/66Exb. "14", pg. 5



56/66


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 EXHIBIT 15

56



57/66

From: Lisa Liberi

Date: Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 3:51 PM

Subject: Confirmation EmailTo: [email protected]

Cc: Phil

Hi Mindy,

Thank you for taking the time with me today and providing me the Agent for Process of Servicefor the divisions in question. Confirming our telephone conversation, we are to serve the

following:

Reed Elsevier, Inc.;

LexisNexis ChoicePoint, Inc.;

LexisNexis Seisint, Inc. dba Accurint;

LexisNexis Group, Inc.;In care of:

CT Corporation

818 W. 7th StreetLos Angeles, CA 90017

LexisNexis Risk and Information Analytics Group, Inc.

In care of:

CT Corporation

1201 Peach TreeAtlanta, GA 30361

Please let me know, if I have any of the service information incorrect. Thank you for your

assistance. As promised, once we receive the summons' back, I will email you a courtesy copy

of the Complaint and Summons.

Respectfully,

Lisa LiberiParalegal/Assistant to Philip J. Berg


555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531

Ph: (610) 825-3134

Fx: (610) 834-7659

Exb. "15", pg. 57



58/66


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 EXHIBIT 16

58



59/66

From: Meek, Melinda S. (LNG-DAY)

Date: Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 8:27 AM

Subject: RE: Confirmation EmailTo: Lisa Liberi

Lisa,

As I mentioned on the phone, I have not previously provided registered agent information for several ofthe companies you requested. Because of that, I am working with the attorneys internally to confirm that I

have given you the correct information. Since you are requesting summons be issued by the Court, Iwanted to let you know that I am still in the process of confirming whether or not this is the correctregistered agent information. I will let you know as soon as I hear.

Thanks,

..

Mindy Meek

OSBA Certified Senior ParalegalLexisNexis Litigation Department

9443 Springboro Pike

Miamisburg, Ohio 45342

[email protected]

937 865-7553 Direct

937 865-1211 Fax

This message may include confidential and privileged attorney client communications. It is intended solely for the

named addressee. If received in error, please promptly delete from your computer and notify me immediately by

email or by telephone.


Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 5:52 PM

To: Meek, Melinda S. (LNG-DAY)

Exb. "16", pg. 5



60/66

Cc: Phil

Subject: Confirmation Email

Hi Mindy,

Thank you for taking the time with me today and providing me the Agent for Process of Service

for the divisions in question. Confirming our telephone conversation, we are to serve the

following:




LexisNexis Group, Inc.;

In care of:

CT Corporation

818 W. 7th StreetLos Angeles, CA 90017


In care of:

CT Corporation

1201 Peach Tree

Atlanta, GA 30361

Please let me know, if I have any of the service information incorrect. Thank you for your

assistance. As promised, once we receive the summons' back, I will email you a courtesy copyof the Complaint and Summons.

Respectfully,

Lisa Liberi

Paralegal/Assistant to Philip J. Berg

LAW OFFICES OF PHILIP J. BERG555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12

Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531

Ph: (610) 825-3134

Fx: (610) 834-7659

Exb. "16", pg. 6



61/66


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 EXHIBIT 17

61



62/66

From: Lisa Liberi

Date: Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 9:34 AM

Subject: Re: Confirmation Email

To: "Meek, Melinda S. (LNG-DAY)"

Cc: Phil

Hi Mindy,

Thank you. Not a problem. Can you advise which companies are in question.

Respectfully,

Lisa Liberi

On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Meek, Melinda S. (LNG-DAY) wrote:

Lisa,As I mentioned on the phone, I have not previously provided registered agent information for several of thecompanies you requested. Because of that, I am working with the attorneys internally to confirm that I have

given you the correct information. Since you are requesting summons be issued by the Court, I wanted to letyou know that I am still in the process of confirming whether or not this is the correct registered agentinformation. I will let you know as soon as I hear.Thanks,

..

Mindy MeekOSBA Certified Senior ParalegalLexisNexis Litigation Department



[email protected]

937 865-7553 Direct

937 865-1211 Fax

This message may include confidential and privileged attorney client communications. It is intended solely for the

named addressee. If received in error, please promptly delete from your computer and notify me immediately by

email or by telephone.



To: Meek, Melinda S. (LNG-DAY)Cc: Phil


Hi Mindy,

Thank you for taking the time with me today and providing me the Agent for Process of Service for the divisions in

question. Confirming our telephone conversation, we are to serve the following:




Exb. "17", pg. 6



63/66

ex s ex s roup, nc.;

In care of:

CT Corporation

818 W. 7th Street

Los Angeles, CA 90017


In care of:

CT Corporation

1201 Peach TreeAtlanta, GA 30361

Please let me know, if I have any of the service information incorrect. Thank you for your assistance. As promised,

once we receive the summons' back, I will email you a courtesy copy of the Complaint and Summons.

Respectfully,

Lisa Liberi

Paralegal/Assistant to Philip J. Berg


555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12

Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531Ph: (610) 825-3134

Fx: (610) 834-7659

Exb. "17", pg. 63



64/66


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 EXHIBIT 18

64



65/66

From: Meek, Melinda S. (LNG-DAY)

Date: Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 1:17 PM

Subject: RE: Confirmation Email

To: Lisa Liberi

Lisa,I am able to confirm that if you want to serve LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier in California, or any of

the other companies referenced below, you should use the following address:CT Corporation System818 W. Seventh Street, 2nd FloorLos Angeles CA 90017Please be advised that you do not need to use the Atlanta, Georgia registered agent address that I previously

gave you. You should use the California address for all of the companies.Thank you,

..


[email protected]

937 865-7553 (direct)


Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 11:35 AM


Cc: Phil

Subject: Re: Confirmation Email

Hi Mindy,

Thank you. Not a problem. Can you advise which companies are in question.

Respectfully,

Lisa Liberi

On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Meek, Melinda S. (LNG-DAY) wrote:

Lisa,As I mentioned on the phone, I have not previously provided registered agent information for several of thecompanies you requested. Because of that, I am working with the attorneys internally to confirm that I havegiven you the correct information. Since you are requesting summons be issued by the Court, I wanted to letyou know that I am still in the process of confirming whether or not this is the correct registered agent

information. I will let you know as soon as I hear.Thanks,

Exb. "18", pg. 6



66/66

..




[email protected]

937 865-7553 Direct

937 865-1211 Fax

This message may include confidential and privileged attorney client communications. It is intended solely for the named

addressee. If received in error, please promptly delete from your computer and notify me immediately by email or by

telephone.




Cc: Phil


Hi Mindy,

Thank you for taking the time with me today and providing me the Agent for Process of Service for the divisions in

question. Confirming our telephone conversation, we are to serve the following:




LexisNexis Group, Inc.;

In care of:

CT Corporation818 W. 7th Street

Los Angeles, CA 90017


In care of:

CT Corporation

1201 Peach Tree

Atlanta, GA 30361

Please let me know, if I have any of the service information incorrect. Thank you for your assistance. As promised,

once we receive the summons' back, I will email you a courtesy copy of the Complaint and Summons.

Respectfully,


Liberi v Taitz Decl of Lisa Liberi in Opp to Reed MTD Doc 391-4

Documents

Transcript of Liberi v Taitz Decl of Lisa Liberi in Opp to Reed MTD Doc 391-4