Lessons learnt – what can be modelled? · • Validation of bathy, sed and bio data • Detailed...
Transcript of Lessons learnt – what can be modelled? · • Validation of bathy, sed and bio data • Detailed...
![Page 1: Lessons learnt – what can be modelled? · • Validation of bathy, sed and bio data • Detailed species modeling • Coastal zone managers involved. Previous SWMwave exposure calculations.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062919/5edf32fdad6a402d666a8cb1/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Lessons learnt –what can be modelled?
EstMar meeting Sigulda 2009-11-27
Martin Isæus
Karl Florén
+46 8161007
![Page 2: Lessons learnt – what can be modelled? · • Validation of bathy, sed and bio data • Detailed species modeling • Coastal zone managers involved. Previous SWMwave exposure calculations.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062919/5edf32fdad6a402d666a8cb1/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Why model distributions? Blue mussel distribution based on UV-video transects
![Page 3: Lessons learnt – what can be modelled? · • Validation of bathy, sed and bio data • Detailed species modeling • Coastal zone managers involved. Previous SWMwave exposure calculations.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062919/5edf32fdad6a402d666a8cb1/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Scale 1:2 000 000 – 1:500 000
1:300 000 -1:100 000
1:50 000 -1:25 000
1:10 000 –1:5000
Tourism ?????? ??????
Detailed study
(habour, cable)
Scoping map Site study
Aquaculture Suitability assessment
Farm siting (ecological impact)
Farm construction
Renewable energy
Regional assessment
Site study (ecological impact
Site study (development/
Scales in mangement
energy assessment (ecological impact (development/ construction)
Aggregate /dredging
Regional assessment
Site study (licensing)
Coastal MPA Regional Sea scoping
National/ subregional scoping
Management map
Higher Sea MPA designation
Regional Sea scoping
Fisheries Resource assessment
Management map
Draft by Jacques Populus, Ifremer
![Page 4: Lessons learnt – what can be modelled? · • Validation of bathy, sed and bio data • Detailed species modeling • Coastal zone managers involved. Previous SWMwave exposure calculations.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062919/5edf32fdad6a402d666a8cb1/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Scales in survey methods and modelling
Scale 1:2 000 000 -1:500 000
1:300 000 -1:100 000
1:50 000 -1:25 000
1:10 000 - 1:5 000
Bathymetry from nauticalcharts x xBathymetry from digitalized oldmeasurments
x x x
Bathymetry from multi-beam x x x xMarine geologiy Regional quality xMarine geology, detailedquality x xquality x xInterpreted back-scatter
x x x xInterpreted side scan sonar
x xSediment modeling basedon multi-beam bathymetry x x x
Wave exposure (SWM)x x x
Predictive modeling, national scale xMarine landsscape(BALANCE ) xMPredictive modeling, pilot areas x
![Page 5: Lessons learnt – what can be modelled? · • Validation of bathy, sed and bio data • Detailed species modeling • Coastal zone managers involved. Previous SWMwave exposure calculations.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062919/5edf32fdad6a402d666a8cb1/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Spatial modelering
Abundans
Miljövariabel
1. Statistical
analysisField data
Model
3. Prediction
Model performance
Prediction accuracy
4. External validation
2. Cross validation
![Page 6: Lessons learnt – what can be modelled? · • Validation of bathy, sed and bio data • Detailed species modeling • Coastal zone managers involved. Previous SWMwave exposure calculations.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062919/5edf32fdad6a402d666a8cb1/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Area under curve (AUC)
AUC-value Quality
0,9 – 1,0 Excellent
0,8 – 0,9 Good
0,7 - 0,8 Intermideate
Pro
port
ion o
f corr
ect
cla
ssific
ations
0,7 - 0,8 Intermideate
0,5 - 0,7 Poor
Proportion of incorrect
classifications
Pro
port
ion o
f corr
ect
cla
ssific
ations
![Page 7: Lessons learnt – what can be modelled? · • Validation of bathy, sed and bio data • Detailed species modeling • Coastal zone managers involved. Previous SWMwave exposure calculations.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062919/5edf32fdad6a402d666a8cb1/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Fucus vesiculosus
![Page 8: Lessons learnt – what can be modelled? · • Validation of bathy, sed and bio data • Detailed species modeling • Coastal zone managers involved. Previous SWMwave exposure calculations.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062919/5edf32fdad6a402d666a8cb1/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Zostera marina
![Page 9: Lessons learnt – what can be modelled? · • Validation of bathy, sed and bio data • Detailed species modeling • Coastal zone managers involved. Previous SWMwave exposure calculations.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062919/5edf32fdad6a402d666a8cb1/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Forsmark
area,
Southern
Bothnian
Sea (SKB)
Carnivorous fish, biomass
![Page 10: Lessons learnt – what can be modelled? · • Validation of bathy, sed and bio data • Detailed species modeling • Coastal zone managers involved. Previous SWMwave exposure calculations.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062919/5edf32fdad6a402d666a8cb1/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Forsmark
area,
Southern
Bothnian
Sea (SKB)
Zooplankton-eating fish, biomass
![Page 11: Lessons learnt – what can be modelled? · • Validation of bathy, sed and bio data • Detailed species modeling • Coastal zone managers involved. Previous SWMwave exposure calculations.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062919/5edf32fdad6a402d666a8cb1/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Prediction of Bladder wrack in MopoDeco
Probability of presence
Prevalence 50% in training data
AUC training data: 0.924
AUC validation data PO: 0.914
AUC validation data PA: 0.520
![Page 12: Lessons learnt – what can be modelled? · • Validation of bathy, sed and bio data • Detailed species modeling • Coastal zone managers involved. Previous SWMwave exposure calculations.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062919/5edf32fdad6a402d666a8cb1/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Prediction
Probability >50%
Variable contribution:
depth 74.7%
salinity 15.9
sand 7.8
fetch 1.6fetch 1.6
![Page 13: Lessons learnt – what can be modelled? · • Validation of bathy, sed and bio data • Detailed species modeling • Coastal zone managers involved. Previous SWMwave exposure calculations.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062919/5edf32fdad6a402d666a8cb1/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
New Finnish
bathymetry
![Page 14: Lessons learnt – what can be modelled? · • Validation of bathy, sed and bio data • Detailed species modeling • Coastal zone managers involved. Previous SWMwave exposure calculations.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062919/5edf32fdad6a402d666a8cb1/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Old bathymetry New bathymetry
![Page 15: Lessons learnt – what can be modelled? · • Validation of bathy, sed and bio data • Detailed species modeling • Coastal zone managers involved. Previous SWMwave exposure calculations.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062919/5edf32fdad6a402d666a8cb1/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
New salinity in
Lithuania and
Kaliningrad
![Page 16: Lessons learnt – what can be modelled? · • Validation of bathy, sed and bio data • Detailed species modeling • Coastal zone managers involved. Previous SWMwave exposure calculations.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062919/5edf32fdad6a402d666a8cb1/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Old salinity New salinity
![Page 17: Lessons learnt – what can be modelled? · • Validation of bathy, sed and bio data • Detailed species modeling • Coastal zone managers involved. Previous SWMwave exposure calculations.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062919/5edf32fdad6a402d666a8cb1/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Prediction
Probability of presence
Prevalence 50% in training data
AUC training data: AUC training data: 0.946
AUC validation data PO: 0.944
AUC validation data PA: 0.616
![Page 18: Lessons learnt – what can be modelled? · • Validation of bathy, sed and bio data • Detailed species modeling • Coastal zone managers involved. Previous SWMwave exposure calculations.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062919/5edf32fdad6a402d666a8cb1/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
2009/2010 – Modeling Östergötland and Västernorrland Counties
• Digitalized bathymetry
• Oceanographic model, salinity, temp, sediment
• Complementing drop-video survey• Complementing drop-video survey
• Validation of bathy, sed and bio data
• Detailed species modeling
• Coastal zone managers involved
![Page 19: Lessons learnt – what can be modelled? · • Validation of bathy, sed and bio data • Detailed species modeling • Coastal zone managers involved. Previous SWMwave exposure calculations.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062919/5edf32fdad6a402d666a8cb1/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Previous SWMwave exposure calculations
![Page 20: Lessons learnt – what can be modelled? · • Validation of bathy, sed and bio data • Detailed species modeling • Coastal zone managers involved. Previous SWMwave exposure calculations.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062919/5edf32fdad6a402d666a8cb1/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
SWM Estonian coast
![Page 21: Lessons learnt – what can be modelled? · • Validation of bathy, sed and bio data • Detailed species modeling • Coastal zone managers involved. Previous SWMwave exposure calculations.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062919/5edf32fdad6a402d666a8cb1/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Simplified Wave Model, SWM
The full method description is found in thesis:
Isæus, Martin. 2004 ”Factors structuring Fucus communities at open and complex coastlines in the Baltic Sea”, Dept. Of Botany, Stockholm University, Sweden, ISBN 91-7265-846-0, p40.
Simplified refers to the fact that bathymtry is not used, only the coastline. The reason for that is that hight resolution bathymetry is rarely available. is rarely available.
Calculations are based on
• 10 years mean wind from coastal stations
• Best available shoreline
![Page 22: Lessons learnt – what can be modelled? · • Validation of bathy, sed and bio data • Detailed species modeling • Coastal zone managers involved. Previous SWMwave exposure calculations.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062919/5edf32fdad6a402d666a8cb1/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Fetch calculations, Diffraction
• A diffraction algorith is used during the fetch calculations which make the waves spread
• Callibrated using aerial photograps on wave crests
Islandwave crests
(i, J)
(i+1, J-2) (i+1, J-1) (i+1, J+1) (i+1, J+2)
![Page 23: Lessons learnt – what can be modelled? · • Validation of bathy, sed and bio data • Detailed species modeling • Coastal zone managers involved. Previous SWMwave exposure calculations.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062919/5edf32fdad6a402d666a8cb1/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
BioEx
R2 = 39.6
SWM
R2 = 55.2
Comparison with other wave models. Correlations with Biological exposure index (BEI) based on shore organisms
distributions.
STWAVE
R2 = 36.2
Oceanographic
method, uses
bathymetry
FWM
R2 = 48.9
![Page 24: Lessons learnt – what can be modelled? · • Validation of bathy, sed and bio data • Detailed species modeling • Coastal zone managers involved. Previous SWMwave exposure calculations.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062919/5edf32fdad6a402d666a8cb1/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
SWM vs. STWAVE wave characteristicsin modeling kelp (Laminaria hyperborea) in Møre, Norway
Model/parameters AIC cvROC
SWM 424 0.78
STWAVE – orbital velocity 474 0.73
STWAVE – bed stress 483 0.72STWAVE – bed stress 483 0.72
STWAVE – wave height 467 0.73
![Page 25: Lessons learnt – what can be modelled? · • Validation of bathy, sed and bio data • Detailed species modeling • Coastal zone managers involved. Previous SWMwave exposure calculations.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062919/5edf32fdad6a402d666a8cb1/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Conclusions = lessons learnt
Modelled species/habitat maps are wanted!
It is possible to make good models! (indicated by high model performance values)
To be able to make good regional predictions the environmental layers must be improved environmental layers must be improved considerably! (poor external validation values)
SWM Wave exposure –robust and relevant
Map quality should meet 1:50 000 scale for most management purposes
![Page 26: Lessons learnt – what can be modelled? · • Validation of bathy, sed and bio data • Detailed species modeling • Coastal zone managers involved. Previous SWMwave exposure calculations.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062919/5edf32fdad6a402d666a8cb1/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Thank you!
Martin Isæus
+46 8161011
www.aquabiota.se