Lessons from Tragedy: Review of Child Fatalities in New York City
-
Upload
bill-de-blasio -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of Lessons from Tragedy: Review of Child Fatalities in New York City
8/3/2019 Lessons from Tragedy: Review of Child Fatalities in New York City
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lessons-from-tragedy-review-of-child-fatalities-in-new-york-city 1/12
1
8/3/2019 Lessons from Tragedy: Review of Child Fatalities in New York City
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lessons-from-tragedy-review-of-child-fatalities-in-new-york-city 2/12
2
“Mural for Nixzmary,” Source: joujoubee's flickr stream(http://www.flickr.com/photos/klr/)
The purpose of our child welfare system is to protect our mostvulnerable children. Whenever a child in that system suffersfurther abuse or, even worse, dies despite the intervention of authorities, it is a call to action. The City must learn lessons and
take every possible step to break the cycle of abuse, close gapsin support and prevent future tragedies.
The tragic death of Nixzmary Brown on January 11, 2006 grippedthe entire city. As Chair of the City Council’s General WelfareCommittee at the time, Bill de Blasio led an oversight effort aspart of a coordinated City response that prompted a major overhaul of our child welfare system. Exhaustive case reviewsand the work of several task forces and working groups havesince improved communication between City agencies.
As tragic as the loss of Nixzmary was, hundreds of other childrenhave been lost in the years since, though their stories do notmake the headlines or result in new laws and policies. On thesixth anniversary of Nixzmary’s death, the Office of Public Advocate Bill de Blasio conducted a review of fatality reportsissued by the New York State Office of Children and Family Services in order to improve prevention and learnlessons that can save the lives of vulnerable children. These reports are generated with the precise goal of identifying new risk factors and areas of focus to better protectchildren. Public Advocate de Blasio’s review encompasses 75 child fatality reports released between January andDecember 2011. The review found:
Fatalities often occur following multiple reports of abuse or neglect. Deaths occurred in families with, onaverage, more than five such reports; four families had over 15 accounts.
Many mothers of children who die have had a history of engagement with the child welfare systemthemselves as children. 44% had contact as a child, and nine mothers had themselves spent time in thefoster care system.
Despite sustained education efforts, unsafe sleeping arrangements continue to lead to prematuredeaths. Practices such as co-sleeping with an adult were involved in 29% of fatalities for children under the ageof one.
Lack of stable housing is common among these families. 28% of child fatalities occurred in families with ahistory of homelessness or poor housing conditions, which place additional stress on families that often already
face multiple challenges. The record number of families living in shelter, including nearly 17,000 children as of December 2011, must be addressed.
Public Advocate Bill de Blasio urges the Administration for Children’s Service and other City agencies to take thefollowing steps.
1. Implement a system at ACS that triggers comprehensive assessment of cases involving multiple reports of abuse or neglect by an internal review team. Submit a portion of these cases to a panel of outside experts for additional review, with the goal of developing recommendations for the rest of ACS’s high-risk caseload.
8/3/2019 Lessons from Tragedy: Review of Child Fatalities in New York City
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lessons-from-tragedy-review-of-child-fatalities-in-new-york-city 3/12
3
2. Broaden outreach on safe infant sleeping arrangements by enlisting pediatricians, community health providersand other community leaders to convince parents to adopt sleeping practices that reduce the risk of injury anddeath.
3. ACS and the Department of Homeless Services should jointly review the demographic profiles of families inshelter to identify those facing multiple risks – in particular families with a history of multiple prior contacts withthe child welfare system -- that would benefit from supportive housing.
Just as the facts surrounding the untimely death of Nixzmary Brown prompted a review of policy and practice, thePublic Advocate presents this snapshot of recent fatality reports to prompt ongoing review and discussion regardingchild welfare practice and policy in New York City.
8/3/2019 Lessons from Tragedy: Review of Child Fatalities in New York City
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lessons-from-tragedy-review-of-child-fatalities-in-new-york-city 4/12
4
Six years ago, the tragic death of Nixzmary Brown shook New York City and its child welfare system, generatingmajor reforms at the New York City Administration for Children’s Services (“ACS”) and other agencies that workwith ACS on child welfare matters. The tragic death led to significant reexamination of aspects of the City’ssystems and practices for preventing abuse and neglect and protecting our most vulnerable youth. Nixzmary ’s
family was known to ACS prior to her death, leaving open questions regarding what additional steps could havebeen taken to protect her safety and well-being.
Nixzmary Brown’s death was a tragedy that could have been avoided. The substantial media attention the casereceived helped to prompt a thorough review of the circumstances and ultimately led to significant reforms at ACS.Every year, dozens of infants and children whose families had previously come in contact with the child welfaresystem die in New York City. Each of these deaths – which for the most part go unheralded – also represents atragedy. As the City remembers Nixzmary on the sixth anniversary of her death, this policy brief focuses on other children whose families similarly were known to the child welfare system and whose deaths were reviewed by theNew York State Office of Children and Family Services in reports issued between January and December 2011.
New York State’s Office of Children and Family Services (“OCFS”) investigates deaths and issues r eports regardingfatalities in the following circumstances:
…the death of any child whose care and custody or custody and guardianship has been transferred toan authorized agency, any child for whom child protective services has an open case, any child for whomthe local department of social services has an open preventive services case, and in the case of areport made to the central register involving the death of a child. A fatality review team may alsoinvestigate any unexplained or unexpected death of any child under the age of eighteen…. 1
The Office of Public Advocate Bill de Blasio reviewed and analyzed fatality reports issued by the OCFS during 2011involving children whose families were known to the child welfare system prior to the fatality.2
This policy brief presents observations based on the review. It does not aim to provide a comprehensive analysis of issues raised by the reports, but to note a few common themes that emerge from the review: (1) a substantialpercentage of the reports involved children from families that had numerous contacts with the child welfare systembefore the incident that led to the fatality; (2) many of the children came from families with a multi-generationalhistory of engagement with the child welfare system; (3) a substantial number of children in the reports died fromsleeping-related deaths; and (4) a significant number of reports involved children from families with unstablehousing situations or with a history of housing instability within the past five years.
This policy brief offers demographic information regarding the children whose families were known to ACS or whoseparents had been known to the child welfare system. While one cannot draw definitive conclusions regardingtrends in abuse and neglect based on the small number of reports examined and the limited scope of the review,this brief seeks to draw lessons about how to protect thousands of vulnerable children across New York City. Justas the facts surrounding the untimely death of Nixzmary Brown prompted review of policy and practice, thesnapshot offered by these reports should prompt ongoing review and discussion regarding child welfare practiceand policy in New York City.
1 New York State Social Services Law § 422-A
2 The analysis in this policy brief is based upon 75 reports issued by OCFS during 2011 that relate to fatalities of children whose familieshad contact with the New York City child welfare system prior to the fatality. The fatality reports do not provide any identifying informationregarding children who were the subjects of the report or their families.
8/3/2019 Lessons from Tragedy: Review of Child Fatalities in New York City
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lessons-from-tragedy-review-of-child-fatalities-in-new-york-city 5/12
5
Nixzmary Brown’s death prompted a significant assessment of child welfare policies and practices. Case reviews,rigorous oversight, and a citywide interagency task force led to specific policy reforms based on the gaps thatbecame evident in the case.
Shortly after Nixzmary Brown’s death in January 2006, Mayor Bloomberg announced the creation of theInteragency Task Force on Child Welfare and Safety (“Task Force”) to evaluate the coordination between ACS, theNew York City Police Department (“NYPD”) and the New York City Department of Education (“DOE”). In March2006, the Task Force announced a series of reforms to address gaps in communication among City agenciesrevealed through Nixzmary Brown’s case. The major reforms included:
Strengthening relationships between ACS and the NYPD, including:
A full-time NYPD supervisor was stationed at ACS to better facilitate communication between the NYPD and ACS.
A senior level position within ACS designated for a former law enforcement officer to serve as ACS Senior
Investigations Advisor Establishment of a central point of contact within the NYPD for ACS.
New procedures to facilitate triggering an ‘Instant Response Team’ (IRT) or requesting police assistance.
The creation of a radio sub-code with NYPD for assistance in child welfare calls.
Formalized interagency meetings with the NYPD liaison to ACS and the ACS Senior Advisor for Investigationswith other staff members included if necessary.
Strengthening relationships between ACS and DOE, including:
Improved response mechanisms for dealing with excessive absenteeism – particularly through DOE’s Form
407 Tracking System.3
Monitoring the response time for DOE staff to investigate reasons for excessive absences for students in Pre-K
through Grade 8.
Provide school administers the authority to promptly file a report of educational neglect if the parent/caregiver refuses to work with the school staff.
Stronger review and oversight mechanisms for dealing with truancy data.
Development of an alert in the school data system to notify school staff of the names of students who have407’s in grades Pre-K – 8 that have been open for more than 10 days, including a 407 history for the currentschool year for each child listed.
Requiring bi-weekly monitoring of Form 407s generated by schools for grades Pre-K - 8 that have been openfor more than 10 days.
Establishment of education liaisons with DOE in all ACS field offices & establishment points of contact for ACSat each school
To improve communication with school staff, DOE committed to providing ACS with a list of designatedreporters for each school for ACS staff to use as the primary point of contact at the school.
3 Form 407s are DOE’s mechanism for tracking student attendance and triggering investigation of unexcused absences.
8/3/2019 Lessons from Tragedy: Review of Child Fatalities in New York City
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lessons-from-tragedy-review-of-child-fatalities-in-new-york-city 6/12
6
Improvements within ACS, including:
Provide ACS Specialists with more guidance, particularly on the definition of educational neglect
Enhancement of ACS’ case practice guide and training materials to more clearly define an educational neglectcase
The tragic death of Nixzmary Brown in January 2006 led to many positive changes within ACS. Nonetheless, in the
years since Nixzmary’s death, many more children whose families were known to ACS have died prematurely.While their deaths have not, by and large, grabbed headlines or led to task forces or large scale reforms, theyshould play a role in strengthening City policy and practice designed to preserve the health and safety of vulnerable children. The 75 child fatality reports analyzed by the Office of the Public Advocate share themes thatare worthy of discussion amongst ACS and child welfare advocates; the balance of this policy brief presents a basicpicture of the lives lost and identifies a few of those themes.
8/3/2019 Lessons from Tragedy: Review of Child Fatalities in New York City
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lessons-from-tragedy-review-of-child-fatalities-in-new-york-city 7/12
7
39%
61%
Deceased Child's Gender
Female
Male
0
10
20
30
40
50
0 to 1 2 to 4 5 to 10 11 to 13 14 to 18
Number of Child Fatalities by Age
The graphs below illustrate basic demographic information derived from the child fatality reports reviewed.
48 of the 75 fatalities reviewed involved children
who were under the age of two. Eleven involvedchildren between the ages of two and four. Eight
involved children between five and ten years old.
Eight involved children who were eleven years old
or older.
46 of the fatality reports (61%) involved male
children, while 29 (39%) involved females.
Twenty-seven (36%) of the child fatalities reviewed
were in Brooklyn; 25 (33%) of the fatalities were in
the Bronx; 11 (15%) of the fatalities were inQueens; 8 (11%) were in Manhattan; and 4 (5%)
were in Staten Island.33%
36%
15%
11%
5%
Fatalities by Borough
Bronx Brooklyn Queens Manhattan Staten Island
8/3/2019 Lessons from Tragedy: Review of Child Fatalities in New York City
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lessons-from-tragedy-review-of-child-fatalities-in-new-york-city 8/12
8
The graph below compares the percentage of fatalities by borough with the percentage of New York City population
by borough.
In 25 (34%) of cases, the manner of death was
undetermined; in 24 (32%) of the cases, the
manner of death was a medical condition; in 15
(20%) cases, the manner of death was
determined to be homicide; and in 10 (13%)
cases, the manner of death was accidental.
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
Manhattan The Bronx Brooklyn Queens Staten Island
Comparison of New York City Population and Child Fatalities Reviewed by Borough
Percentage of NYCPopulation
Percentage of ChildFatalities Reviewed
32%
34%
20%
13%1%
Manner of Death
Medical Condition Undetermined Homicide Accidental N/A
8/3/2019 Lessons from Tragedy: Review of Child Fatalities in New York City
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lessons-from-tragedy-review-of-child-fatalities-in-new-york-city 9/12
9
44%
56%
Mother had history of involvement with
child welfare system as a child
Yes
No
Prior engagement with the child welfare system
The reports reviewed reveal patterns of engagement with the child welfare system among families involved in
fatalities. Fifty-six percent (42 of 75) of the reports involved families that had a record of three or more contacts with
the child welfare system prior to the fatality.
Many of the reports indicate multigenerational
engagement with the child welfare system. Forty-
four percent (33 of 75) of mothers in the reports
reviewed had a history of engagement with the child
welfare system as a child. Nine of the mothers had
themselves spent time in the foster care system.
Overall, many of the reports reviewed involved
families where one or both parents had a record of
involvement with ACS as a child. In a significant
number of these cases, the children who were the
subjects of the fatality reports were being raised in
the context of inter-generational, extended familieswith substantial history of engagement with the child
welfare system. The OCFS reports reviewed
provide some information regarding the history of the extended family’s engagement with the child welfare system,
but is the information available is often insufficient to determine whether ACS and other agencies involved with the
families provided services that took into account the complexity of the problems faced by the family.
0
2
46
8
10
12
14
16
18
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 to 15 16 or more
N u m
b e r o f F a m i l i e s
Number of Prior Reports
Reports involving family prior to fatality
8/3/2019 Lessons from Tragedy: Review of Child Fatalities in New York City
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lessons-from-tragedy-review-of-child-fatalities-in-new-york-city 10/12
10
31%69%
Fatalities involving unsafe sleepingpositions
Fatality involvedrollover/suffocation
No indication of
rollover/suffocation
Sleep-related deaths
Sixty-four percent (48 of 75) of the reports reviewed
concerned the death of a child under the age of
one. Thirty-one percent (15 of 48) of these deaths
involved hazardous sleeping conditions or positions,
including co-sleeping with an adult or another childand the presence of pillows, soft bedding, or stuffed
animals in the sleeping area.
Housing Conditions
The fatality reports describe current housing conditions; some provide information regarding recent housing history.The reports do not present information regarding housing history and conditions in a consistent fashion – some
provide substantial detail and others provide little information. Based on the information available in the reports,
28% of families faced current or past housing instability – including poor or overcrowded living conditions or
residence in the shelter system. Nearly half of these families had a history of living in the shelter system.
28%
72%
Housing Conditions
Report notes history
of housinginstability or poor housing conditions
No indication of housing instabilityor poor housingconditions
48%
28%
24%
Housing conditions noted in reports (n=21)
History of living in shelter system
Record of poor housing conditions
Record of overcrowding or other housing instability
8/3/2019 Lessons from Tragedy: Review of Child Fatalities in New York City
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lessons-from-tragedy-review-of-child-fatalities-in-new-york-city 11/12
11
Review of OCFS child fatality reports delivered to the Public Advocate’s Office in 2011 presents only a snapshot of
the reports reviewed. The following recommended steps are based on the limited observations set forth above:
1. Families with history of involvement with child welfare system, including families with
multigenerational record of involvement with child welfare system
The substantial number of cases in which families had multiple contacts with the child welfare system prior to the
fatality raise numerous questions regarding the comprehensiveness of services provided to vulnerable families,
methods used to ensure that investigations of families that are already known to the system through multiple prior
reports take into account the findings of earlier reports. Service assessments for families that have multiple prior
contacts with the child welfare system – including cases involving families where one or both parents have a
substantial history of involvement with the child welfare system -- should include detailed analysis of the impact of
services that have been provided to the family, which should indicate where problems have persisted
notwithstanding prior assistance. ACS’s current strategic plan, released in December 2011, acknowledges that the
high number of investigations of allegations of abuse and neglect that involve three or more prior SCR reports
requires serious attention.4 In addition to pursuing the strategies set forth in its 2012-2013 strategic plan, ACS
should consider implementing a system that triggers comprehensive assessment of cases involving multiple reports
of abuse or neglect by an internal review team and developing a panel of outside experts to review a portion of
these cases.
2. Fatalities related to sleeping position
Of the 48 fatality reports reviewed involving children under age one, 15 noted sleeping conditions that could be
hazardous, including co-sleeping and placement of pillows, blankets and other items in a baby’s sleeping area.While ACS and other state and local agencies have taken numerous steps in recent years to address thesehazards,5 there is still work to be done. ACS should expand its outreach and enlist pediatricians, community healthproviders and other community leaders to amplify efforts to inform parents of safe sleeping practices.
3. Unstable Housing/Homelessness
The reports reviewed reveal that a significant number of families involved in fatalities had a record of inadequate
housing or homelessness, which places additional stress on families that often already face multiple challenges. As
4 See Achieving Excellence in Child Welfare, Juvenile Justice, and Early Care and Education: The Administration for Children’s Services2011-2013 Strategic Plan, December 2011, 2-3.
5 In March 2008, the city joined the statewide ‘Babies Sleep Safest Alone’ campaign and created a ‘Babies Sleep Safest Alone’ brochure.This 2 page brochure can be accessed in .pdf format through the city’s website. Also, the city provides a more general brochu re on safepractices for a new baby which was most recently updated in November 2011. (brochure comes in English, Spanish, & Chinese). This isan excerpt from a December 10, 2008 press release from the NYC Health Department on a goal for the city to help get donated cribs to250 families in NYC by the holiday season: The Health Department started working with the National Cribs for Kids program in 2007. Sincethen, the agency has provided cribs and safe-sleep education through its Newborn Home Visiting Program, which serves new parents withone visit from a health educator. Of the nearly 8,000 families this program visited in 2007, roughly one in six lacked a crib. The HealthDepartment also distributes cribs and educates parents through the Nurse-Family Partnership, an intensive home visiting program for first-time mothers that begins during a woman’s pregnancy and continues until her child is two years old.
8/3/2019 Lessons from Tragedy: Review of Child Fatalities in New York City
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lessons-from-tragedy-review-of-child-fatalities-in-new-york-city 12/12
12
of December 9, 2011, over 9,900 families -- including 16,726 children -- were living in the New York City shelter
system.6 The absence of a clear, citywide plan for addressing family homelessness during the past year has left
many vulnerable families that could benefit from stable, permanent housing living in shelter for longer periods of
time. ACS and DHS should work together to review the demographic profiles of families in shelter to identify
families facing multiple risks – in particular families with a history of multiple prior contacts with the child welfare
system -- that would benefit from supportive housing.
6 http://www.nyc.gov/html/dhs/downloads/pdf/dailyreport.pdf