Lesson 2 Analysis Tools · 2017-10-17 · Analysis Tools 16 1. Comparative financial statement...
Transcript of Lesson 2 Analysis Tools · 2017-10-17 · Analysis Tools 16 1. Comparative financial statement...
Lesson 2 Analysis Tools
15 Università degli Studi di Trieste
D.E.A.M.S.
Paolo Altin
Advanced Accounting AY 2017/2018
Analysis Tools
16
1. Comparative financial statement analysis (or horizontal analysis)
2. Common-size financial statement analysis (or vertical analysis)
3. Ratio Analysis
4. Cash flow analysis
Università degli Studi di Trieste
D.E.A.M.S.
Paolo Altin
Horizontal and Vertical Analysis
• Three main ways to analyze financial statements
• Horizontal analysis
• Year-to-year comparison
• Vertical analysis
• Compare different companies
• Using industry averages
• Compare company’s performance against the industry averages
17 Università degli Studi di Trieste
D.E.A.M.S.
Paolo Altin
Horizontal Analysis
• This analysis is conducted by reviewing consecutive balance sheets, income statements, or statements of cash flows from period to period.
• The most important information revealed is trend.
• Two techniques are popular: year-to-year change analysis and index-number trend analysis.
18 Università degli Studi di Trieste
D.E.A.M.S.
Paolo Altin
Year-to-Year Change Analysis
19
1) When a negative amount appears in the base and a positive amount in the next period (or vice versa), we cannot compute a meaningful percentage change.
2) When there is no amount for the base period, no percentage change is computable.
3) When the base period amount is small, a percentage change can be computed but the number must be interpreted with caution. This is because it can signal a large change merely because of the small base amount used in computing the change.
4) When an item has a value in the base period and none in the next period, the decrease is 100%.
Year-to-Year Change Analysis • The study of percentage changes in comparative statements
• Compute dollar changes
• Compute percentage changes
20
Example: Income Statement • Step 1
• Step 2 21
Copyright Pearson Education, Inc
Example: Balance Sheet (partial)
22
Copyright Pearson Education, Inc
Exercise: Horizontal Analysis - Income Statement
1. Prepare a horizontal analysis of the comparative income statement of Mariner Designs, Inc. Round percentage changes to one decimal place.
23
MARINER DESIGNS, INC.
Comparative Income Statement
Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011
2012 2011
Net sales revenue $ 431,000 $ 372,350
Expenses:
Cost of goods sold $ 200,000 $ 187,550
Selling and general expenses 99,000 91,050
Other expense 8,350 6,850
Total expenses $ 307,350 $ 285,450
Net income $ 123,650 $ 86,900
Copyright Pearson Education, Inc
Exercise: Horizontal Analysis - Income Statement
24
MARINER DESIGNS, INC.
Comparative Income Statement
Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011
Increase (Decrease)
2012 2011 Amount Percent
Net sales revenue $ 431,000 $ 372,350 $ 58,650 15.8 %
Expenses:
Cost of goods sold $ 200,000 $ 187,550 $ 12,450 6.6 %
Selling and general
expenses 99,000 91,050 7,950 8.7 %
Other expense 8,350 6,850 1,500 21.9 %
Total expenses $ 307,350 $ 285,450 21,900 7.7 %
Net income $ 123,650 $ 86,900 $ 36,750 42.3 %
Why did 2012 net income increase by a higher percentage than net sales revenue?
Colgate’s Comparative Income Statements
25
2011 2010 Change % Change
Net sales 16.734 15.564
Cost of sales 7.144 6.360
Gross profit 9.590 9.204
SG&A expenses 5.758 5.414
Other (income) expense 9- 301
Operating profit 3.841 3.489
Interest expense, net 52 59
Income before income taxes 3.789 3.430
Provisions for income taxes 1.235 1.117
Net income including non controlling interests 2.554 2.313
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling int.123 110
Net income attributable to Colgate-Palmolive 2.431 2.203
26 Università degli Studi di Trieste
D.E.A.M.S.
Paolo Altin
Colgate’s Comparative Income Statements
Index-Number Trend Analysis
• Form of horizontal analysis
• Indicates business direction
• How have things changed over the years?
• Select a period of three to five years
• Base year is the earliest year and a normal year;
• Base year is selected and set equal to 100%;
• Subsequent years expressed as a percentage of the base period.
27
Colgate’s Index Number Trend
28
Vertical Analysis • Is also referred to as common-size financial statement analysis.
• Shows relationship of each item to a base amount on financial statements;
• Income statement: each item expressed as percentage of net sales
• Balance sheet: each item expressed as percentage of total assets or total liabilities and equity.
• Remember total assets = total liabilities and equity
29
Vertical Analysis
• Useful in understanding the internal makeup of financial statements;
• In analyzing a balance sheet, it stresses two factors:
1) Source of financing
2) Composition of assets
• Especially useful for intercompany comparisons.
30
Example: Income Statement
• Base amount
• Percentage of the base amount
31
Copyright Pearson Education, Inc
Example: Balance Sheet
• Base amount
• Percentage of base
32
Copyright Pearson Education, Inc
Vertical Analysis – Short Exercise Tri-State Optical Company reported the following amounts on its balance sheet at December 31, 2012 and 2011: Prepare a vertical analysis of Tri-State assets for 2012 and 2011.
33
2012 2011
Cash and receivables $ 54,530 $ 46,860
Inventory 42,435 32,670
Property, plant, and equipment, net 108,035 85,470
Total assets $ 205,000 $ 165,000
Copyright Pearson Education, Inc
Tri-State Optical Company reported the following amounts on its balance sheet at December 31, 2012 and 2011: Prepare a vertical analysis of Tri-State assets for 2012 and 2011.
34
2012 2011
Cash and receivables $ 54,530 $ 46,860
Inventory 42,435 32,670
Property, plant, and equipment, net 108,035 85,470
Total assets $ 205,000 $ 165,000
2012 % of
total
2011 % of
total
Cash and receivables $ 54,530 $ 46,860
Inventory 42,435 32,670
Property, plant, and equipment, net 108,035 85,470
Total assets $ 205,000 $ 165,000
26.6
20.7
52.7
100.0
28.4
19.8
51.8
100.0
Copyright Pearson Education, Inc
Vertical Analysis – Short Exercise
Colgate’s Common-Size Income Statements
35
Colgate’s Common-Size Balance Sheet
36
Colgate’s Common-Size Balance Sheet
37
Colgate’s Common-Size Balance Sheet
38
Common-Size Statements • Common-size statements compare one company to another
• Report only percentages (same as vertical analysis)
• Remove dollar value bias
Copyright Pearson Education, Inc
39
Common-Size Statements • Common-size statements compare one company to another
• Report only percentages (same as vertical analysis)
• Remove dollar value bias
Copyright Pearson Education, Inc
40
Benchmarking
• Comparing a company with another leading companies
• Two main types:
• Against a key competitor
• Against the industry average
41
Common-Size Income Statement – Short Exercise
Data for Martinez, Inc., and Rosado, Corp., follow: 1. Prepare common-size income statements.
Martinez Rosado
Net sales $ 10,600 $ 18,600
Cost of goods sold 6,455 13,522
Other expenses 3,541 4,185
Net income $ 604 $ 893
Copyright Pearson Education, Inc
42
Data for Martinez, Inc., and Rosado, Corp., follow: 1. Prepare common-size income statements.
Martinez Rosado
Net sales $ 10,600 $ 18,600
Cost of goods sold 6,455 13,522
Other expenses 3,541 4,185
Net income $ 604 $ 893
Martinez Rosado
Net sales 100 % 100 %
Cost of goods sold 60.9 % 72.7 %
Other expenses 33.4 % 22.5 %
Net income 5.7 % 4.8 %
Copyright Pearson Education, Inc
43
Common-Size Income Statement – Short Exercise
(Continued)
2. Which company earns more net income?
3. Which company’s net income is a higher percentage of its net sales?
Martinez Rosado
Net sales 100 % 100 %
Cost of goods sold 60.9 % 72.7 %
Other expenses 33.4 % 22.5 %
Net income 5.7 % 4.8 %
Copyright Pearson Education, Inc
44
Common-Size Income Statement – Short Exercise
S15-4 :COMMON-SIZE INCOME STATEMENT
(Continued)
2. Which company earns more net income?
3. Which company’s net income is a higher percentage of its net sales?
Martinez Rosado
Net sales 100 % 100 %
Cost of goods sold 60.9 % 72.7 %
Other expenses 33.4 % 22.5 %
Net income 5.7 % 4.8 %
Rosado
Martinez
Copyright Pearson Education, Inc
45
The analysis – short recap
• The goal of analyzing a financial statement is essentially to determine if the story it tells is good, bad or indifferent.
• In other words, to evaluate the financial health of a business.
• The analyst draws a few initial conditions, than puts the financial statement into context:
• by comparing it with income statements of earlier periods (past results )
• by comparing it with income statements of other companies. 46
The analysis - short recap
• Comparative Financial Analysis: it provides a comparison of a company ‘s financial performance over multiple periods (year-to-year analysis). It is possible to determine trends.
• Common-size Statement Financial Analysis: it helps to compare different companies and to provide a benchmark analysis.
47
Ratio Analysis • Ratio analysis is among the most popular and widely
used tools of financial analysis.
• Provide a quick and (relatively) simple means of evaluating the financial health of a business (company).
• Computation of a ratio is a simple arithmetic operation, its interpretation is more complex.
• A ratio must refer to an economically important relation, to be meaningful.
48
Ratio Analysis • Ratios relate one figure appearing in the financial
statement to some other figures appearing there (e.g., operating profit in relation to capital employed or in relation to assets) or to some other resources of the business (e.g., net profit for employee, sales revenue per square metre of selling space, etc.).
• Ratios are very helpful when comparing different businesses, even if involved in different scale of operations (e.g. expressing operating profit in relation to capital employed).
• They are one of the starting points of the analysis, not an end point! 49
Factors affecting ratios • Economic events
• Industry factors
• Managament policies
• Accounting methods
• Reliability of the numbers
• Skillful of analyst in application and interpretation
50
Any limitation in accounting measurements impact the effectiveness of ratios.
Ratio Interpretation • It is not necessary to compute all possible ratios to
analyze a situation.
• Ratios, like most techniques in financial analysis, are not relevant in isolation.
• They are usefully interpreted in comparison with:
• prior ratios
• predetermined standards
• ratios of competitors.
• The variability of a ratio across time is often as important as its trend.
51
Cash Flow Analysis • It is primarily used as a tool to evaluate the sources and
uses of funds.
• It provides insights into how a company is obtaining its financing and deploying its resources.
• It also is used in cash flow forecasting and as part of liquidity analysis.
52
Colgate’s Cash Flow Statement
53
Colgate’s Cash Flow Statement
54
Analysis Resources
• www.adr.com
• www.bigcharts.com
• www.bridge.com
• www.cbsmarketwatch.com
• www.financenter.com
• www.freeedgar.com
• www.ipomaven.com
• www.marketguide.com
• www.morningstar.com
• www.nasdaq.com
• www.quote.com
• www.businessweek.com
• www.10kwizard.com
• www.wallstreetcity.com 55