LEONOR ALCANTARA, individually andlakewoodlaworg.ipage.com/documents/Motion for Summary...

1

--------------------------------------

LEONOR ALCANTARA, individually and as Guardian ad Litem for E.A.; LESLIE JOHNSON, individually and as Guardian ad Litem for D.J.; JUANA PEREZ, individually and as Guardian ad Litem for Y.P.; TATIANA ESCOBAR individually; and IRA SCHULMAN, individually and as Guardian ad Litem for A.S. Petitioners, v. DAVID HESPE, COMMISSIONER OF THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION; the NEW JERSEY STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION; and the NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Respondents. --------------------------------------

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )OAL DOCKET No: ) EDU 11069-2014S ) ) Agency Ref. No.: ) 156-6/14 ) ) ) ) ) ) )

BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

______________________________________________________________

ARTHUR H. LANG 918 East Kennedy Blvd. Lakewood, NJ 08701 (732) 609-5530 [email protected] Attorney for Petitioners

2

TABLE OF CONTENTS APPLICABLE RULES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 APPLICABLE CASES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 PROCEDURAL HISTORY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 STATEMENT OF THE FACTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 STANDARD FOR SUMMARY DECISION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 LEGAL ARGUMENT POINT I. THE CALCULATION OF THE COST OF EDUCATIONAL ADEQUACY IN LAKEWOOD FAILS TO REFLECT ACTUAL MANDATED EXPENSES NECESSARY FOR THE SYSTEM OF FREE PUBLIC SCHOOLS THEREBY DEPRIVING THE CHILDREN OF LAKEWOOD THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO A THOROUGH AND EFFICIENT EDUCATION. . . . . . . . . . . 13 A. RESPONDENTS CALCULATE THE ADEQUACY BUDGET IN LAKEWOOD AS $119 MILLION BASED ON THE NUMBER OF CHILDREN ENROLLED IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 B. RESPONDENTS FAIL TO INCLUDE THE COST OF PROVIDING TRANSPORTATION AND A FREE AND APPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOR SPECIAL NEEDS CHILDREN IN A BASE POPULATION FIVE TIMES THE NUMBER OF CHILDREN COUNTED IN THE CALCULATION OF ADEQUACY. .16 C. THE FAILURE TO INCLUDE THE EXPENSE OF SERVING THE UNIQUE DEMOGRAPHY OF LAKEWOOD IN THE ADEQUACY BUDGET HAS CAUSED SIGNIFICANT BUDGETARY DEFICITS, LOW TEACHER SALARIES, THE ELIMINATION OF COURSES AND PROGRAMS, AND UNACCEPTABLY LOW TEST SCORES AND LOW ENROLLMENT IN POST-SECONDARY INSTITUTIONS. . 21 POINT II. RESPONDENTS FAIL TO PROVIDE THE CHILDREN OF LAKEWOOD WITH A THOROUGH AND EFFICIENT EDUCATION BECAUSE LAKEWOOD IS A LOW-INCOME URBAN DISTRICT, STUDENTS IN LOW-INCOME URBAN DISRICTS REQUIRE MORE FUNDING THAN STUDENTS IN HIGHER INCOME OR SUBURBAN DISTRICTS, AND LAKEWOOD IS FUNDED SIGNIFICANTLY LESS THAN LOW-INCOME URBAN DISTRICTS OR SUBURBAN DISTRICTS RESULTING IN UNACCEPTABLY LOW STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. . . . . .25 A. LAKEWOOD IS A LOW-INCOME URBAN DISTRICT. . . . . . . . . 25

3

B. STUDENTS IN LOW-INCOME URBAN DISTRICTS REQUIRE MORE FUNDING THAN STUDENTS IN HIGHER INCOME OR SUBURBAN DISTRICTS. . . .27 C. LAKEWOOD IS FUNDED SUBSTANTIALLY LOWER THAN EVERY LOW-INCOME URBAN DISTRICT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 POINT III. THE TAX BASE OF LAKEWOOD DOES NOT HAVE THE CAPACITY TO FILL THE DEFICIENCY IN ITS ADEQUACY BUDGET. . . . . . . .30 CONCLUSION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34

APPLICABLE RULES

N.J.A.C. 1:1-10.4 (c) No later than 15 days from receipt of a notice requesting discovery, the receiving party shall provide the requested information, material or access or offer a schedule for reasonable compliance with the notice; or, in the case of a notice requesting admissions, each matter therein shall be admitted unless within the 15 days the receiving party answers, admits or denies the request or objects to it pursuant to N.J.A.C. 1:1-10.4(d). N.J.A.C.1:1-12.5 Motion for summary decision; when and how made; partial summary decision (a) A party may move for summary decision upon all or any of the substantive issues in a contested case. Such motion must be filed no later than 30 days prior to the first scheduled hearing date or by such date as ordered by the judge.(b) The motion for summary decision shall be served with briefs and with or without supporting affidavits. The decision sought may be rendered if the papers and discovery which have been filed, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact challenged and that the moving party is entitled to prevail as a matter of law. When a motion for summary decision is made and supported, an adverse party in order to prevail must by responding affidavit set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue which can only be determined in an evidentiary proceeding. Such response must be filed within 20 days of service of the motion. A reply, if any, must be filed no later than 10 days thereafter. If the adverse party does not so respond, a summary decision, if appropriate, shall be entered.(c) Motions for summary

4

decision shall be decided within 45 days from the due date of the last permitted responsive filing. Any motion for summary decision not decided by an agency head which fully disposes of the case shall be treated as an initial decision under N.J.A.C. 1:1-18. Any partial summary decision shall be treated as required by (e) and (f) below.(d) If, on motion under this section, a decision is not rendered upon all the substantive issues in the contested case and a hearing is necessary, the judge at the time of ruling on the motion, by examining the papers on file in the case as well as the motion papers, and by interrogating counsel, if necessary, shall, if practicable, ascertain what material facts exist without substantial controversy and shall thereupon enter an order specifying those facts and directing such further proceedings in the contested case as are appropriate. At the hearing in the contested case, the facts so specified shall be deemed established.

APPLICABLE CASES Brill v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 142 N.J. 520, (N.J., 1995). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11, 12 Abbott ex rel. Abbott v. Burke (Abbott XX), 199 N.J. 140, 152 (N.J., 2009).. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13, 14, 15, 27 Abbott v. Burke (Abbott XXI), 206 N.J. 332(N.J., 2011). 16, 36 Abbott by Abbott v. Burke (Abbott II), 119 N.J. 287, 381(N.J., 1990). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .25, 28 Abbott v. Burke, EDU 5581-85(initial decision), Aug. 24, 1988. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26, 27 Robinson v. Cahill, 62 N.J. 473 (N.J., 1973). . . . . . . . 30 State v. Allen, 73 N.J. 132 (N.J., 1977). . . . . . . . 34, 35

5

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

The core issue in this case is the way the State calculates

the funding necessary for a Thorough and Efficient system of

public schools in Lakewood. New Jersey school budgets are

based solely on the number of children in the public schools.

However, the school budget must statutorily provide for

transportation and special education of all children who

reside in the District. Lakewood is unique because it has

approximately 25,000 children who attend nonpublic schools and

only 6,020 who attend public schools. Almost half the total

school budget is spent on statutorily mandated transportation

and special education. Lakewood does not have the means to

provide an adequate education for its public school students

because of these expenses. As noted, the mandated costs

consume half the budget, eviscerating public school

curriculum, programs and courses. The latest census data show

Lakewood as one of the lowest income communities in New

Jersey. Consequently, a multiplication based on public school

students short-changes them dramatically.

6

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On June 24, 2014, Petitioners who are students of public

and nonpublic schools in Lakewood and their parents filed a

petition challenging the allocation method and the amount of

State funding received by the Lakewood School District.

On July 7, 2014 Petitioners submitted an Amended Petition.

On September 2, 2014 the Respondents moved to dismiss the

Petition for failure to name the Lakewood Board of Education

as a party, for failure to allege a sufficient factual basis

to demonstrate the Petitioners’ standing, and because the

remedies sought are not available in this type of proceeding.

The Commissioner of Education subsequently sent the matter to

the Office of Administrative Law.

On January 14, 2015 Professor Paul L. Tractenberg moved for

leave to participate.

On March 11, 2015 the Court granted Professor Tractenberg

leave to participate.

On July 23, 2015 the Court denied Respondents' motion to

dismiss.

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS

The facts in this case are undisputed. They are matters

of public record for administrative notice, and respondents

have not denied their existence.

7

1. Lakewood is ranked 555 out of 564 New Jersey

municipalities in per capita income (Appendix 1, Column 3,

hereafter 1:3).

2. 6,020 students attend Lakewood public schools (1:4).

3. 90% of Lakewood public school students are classified as

low-income whereas the average of the Abbott districts is

76.0%. (1:8).

4. 83.4% of 2015 Lakewood public school students are

Hispanic and 10% are African-American (Request for Admissions,

paragraph 1, hereafter RA:1).

5. 25.9% of Lakewood public school students are classified

as Limited English Proficiency while the average of the Abbott

districts is 10.0% (1:10).

6. The tax levy per pupil in Lakewood is $15,008, whereas

the tax levy per pupil in Abbott districts is $2,560 and the

tax levy in Toms River Regional is $8,846. (1:14).

7. The 2015-2016 Operating Budget in Lakewood is

$120,830,423 (1:21).

8. The Adequacy Budget in Lakewood public schools is

$119,334,752 (1:22).

9. 24,996 children attend nonpublic schools. (Exhibit B,

page 47; hereafter Exh.B,47).

8

10. 17,377 or 70% of children attending nonpublic schools are

low-income (Exh.B,47).

11. 3,577 students attending nonpublic schools are classified

as students with disabilities (Exh.B,48).

12. 4,730 children in Lakewood are classified as students

with disabilities (Exh.B,48).

13. The 2015-2016 budgeted regular education transportation

and special education tuition cost of serving 31,000 children,

$46,066,401, consumed 38.1% of the Operating Budget in

Lakewood. (1:27,28).

14. The documents presented by State Monitor David Shafter

show that the actual 2015-2016 regular education

transportation cost is $19,659,741 and the special education

transportation cost is $4,862,460 totaling $24,522,201 in

transportation costs (Exh.C,59).

15. The documents presented by State Monitor David Shafter

show that the actual 2015-2016 tuition costs are $29,448,564

(Exh.C,50). The $53,970,765 total cost of transportation and

tuition consumes 44.7% of the Operating Budget in Lakewood.

16. The 2015-16 Budgetary Comparative Per Pupil Cost in

Lakewood is $12,348, the average of Abbott districts is

$17,793, and the statewide average of New Jersey districts is

$15,348. (1:34).

9

17. The 2015-16 Total Classroom Instruction Cost Per Pupil in

Lakewood is $6,600, the the average of Abbott districts is

$10,017, and the average of all New Jersey districts is

$8,933(1:35).

18. Lakewood has the lowest average and lowest median teacher

salary of all 103 large K-12 districts with 3,500 or more

students. (1:37,38,40,41).

19. The average teacher experience in Lakewood is 8.3 years

compared with the 11.8 median of all New Jersey districts.

20. The ratio of students to teachers in Lakewood is 13.1

whereas the average ratio of students to teachers in Abbott

districts is 11.3. (1:42).

21. Lakewood spends $128 for classroom supplies per student,

the 3rd lowest ranking large district, whereas the average

Abbott district spends $384 and the statewide average is $321.

(1:44).

22. Lakewood spends $131 per pupil for legal services, the

most of any large district. (1:46).

23. Lakewood is mandated to provide 19,904 children with

remote transportation (Exh.B,53).

24. Lakewood sends 260 pupils to private schools for the

handicapped (1:67).

10

25. Lakewood spends $9,289,304 on Speech, Occupational

Therapy, Physical Therapy and Related Services; Other Support

Services, and the Child Study Team (1:73).

26. The $53,970,765 cost of transportation and tuition

together with the $9,289,304 cost of Speech, Occupational

Therapy, Physical Therapy and Related Services; Other Support

Services, and the Child Study Team is a total cost of

$63,260,069 out of an operating budget of $120,830,423 or

52.4%.

27. The average composite SAT score for Lakewood students is

1101 whereas the Abbott average is 1191 and the state average

is 1514. (Appendix 2, Column C; hereafter 2:C),

28. Only 45.6% Lakewood students are in post-secondary

education 16 months after graduation whereas the Abbott

average is 62.7%. (2:I).

29. Lakewood births have risen over the last twenty years

with 3,966 births in 2011 compared to 2,663 births in

Paterson, 4,440 in Jersey City and 4,353 in Newark. (Appendix

3, Page 24; hereafter Apx.3,24).

30. 20,902 students attended nonpublic schools in Lakewood in

2013-14 and 22,688 in 2014-15 and 24,996 in 2015-16, 20%

increase over two years. (Request for Admissions, paragraph 2

and 3; hereafter RA:2,3)

11

31. The percent of the Lakewood operating budget consumed by

transportation and tuition has grown from 25.6% in 2006 to

38.1% in 2015 (Appendix 3, page 15; hereafter Apx.3,15).

32. The High School Proficiency Assessment Language Arts

scores for Lakewood from 2008-2014 were lower than the average

and median scores of the Abbott districts (Apx.4,26).

33. The High School Proficiency Assessment Mathematics scores

for Lakewood were about half the points of the state average

and more than ten points lower than the average and median of

the Abbott districts every year since 2009 (Apx.4,27).

34. The Grade 8 GEPA and NJ ASK Language Arts score for

Lakewood was below the average and median of the Abbott

districts every year since 2004. (Apx.5,32).

35. The Grade 8 GEPA and NJ ASK Mathematics score for

Lakewood was below the average and median of the Abbott

districts every year since 2006. (Apx.5,33).

36. The Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate was at or below the

average and median of the Abbott district for the last four

years. (Apx.6,39)

37. The School Report Card posted on Respondents website

compares Lakewood schools with Abbott district schools in the

same demographic peer group. (Apx.7,41-47).

12

STANDARD FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

The legal standard for summary judgment is found in Brill

v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 142 N.J. 520, (N.J.,

1995). A court must make “a determination whether there exists

a ‘genuine issue’ of material fact that precludes summary

judgment requir[ing] the motion judge to consider whether the

competent evidential materials presented, when viewed in the

light most favorable to the non-moving party, are sufficient

to permit a rational factfinder to resolve the alleged

disputed issue in favor of the non-moving party.” Id. at 540.

The Uniform Administrative Procedure Rules provide for

summary judgment:

“(a) A party may move for summary decision upon all or any of the substantive issues in a contested case. . . . (b)When a motion for summary decision is made and supported, an adverse party in order to prevail must by responding affidavit set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue which can only be determined in an evidentiary proceeding. Such response must be filed within 20 days of service of the motion. A reply, if any, must be filed no later than 10 days thereafter. If the adverse party does not so respond, a summary decision, if appropriate, shall be entered.” N.J.A.C. § 1:1-12.5

Petitioners incorporate by reference their Request for

Admissions in Exhibit A, including Appendices 1-7, submitted

to Respondents on December 28, 2015, which pursuant to

N.J.A.C. §1:1-10.4, “in the case of a notice requesting

13

admissions, each matter therein shall be admitted unless

within the 15 days the receiving party answers, admits or

denies the request or objects to it pursuant to N.J.A.C. 1:1-

10.4(d).” It has been 53 days since Petitioners have made

their request for admissions. The data in the Request for

Admissions were collected from the Respondents’ and other

public sources and should be considered admitted,

uncontroversial and administratively noticed.

LEGAL ARGUMENT

POINT I. THE CALCULATION OF THE COST OF EDUCATIONAL ADEQUACY IN LAKEWOOD FAILS TO REFLECT ACTUAL MANDATED EXPENSES NECESSARY FOR THE SYSTEM OF FREE PUBLIC SCHOOLS THEREBY DEPRIVING THE CHILDREN OF LAKEWOOD THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO A THOROUGH AND EFFICIENT EDUCATION.

The New Jersey Constitution entitles the children of this

State to a "thorough and efficient education." N.J. Const.

art. VIII, § 4. To meet its constitutional duty, the School

Finance Reform Act of 2008 (SFRA) “allocates state resources

to school districts, while also requiring certain levels of

funding at the local level.” Abbott ex rel. Abbott v. Burke

(Abbott XX), 199 N.J. 140, 152 (2009). The Adequacy Budget is

the core calculation of the money needed to provide T & E.

“SFRA identifies a base cost associated with the education of an elementary pupil without any particular special needs. Once identified, the per-

14

pupil amount is increased to reflect characteristics that are widely accepted as increasing the cost of education. Those characteristics are: 1) grade level, and whether the pupil is 2) an at-risk pupil (defined as one eligible for a free- or reduced-price lunch), 3) a Limited English Proficiency (LEP) pupil, or 4) a special education student of mild, moderate, or severe classification.” Id. at 152.

The grade level multipliers are provided by N.J.S.A 18A:7F-

50. The at-risk and LEP multipliers are provided by N.J.S.A

18A:7F-51.

The State share in the Adequacy Budget is referred to as

Equalization Aid provided by N.J.S.A 18A:7F-52 and N.J.S.A

18A:7F-53.

“Equalization Aid is State-provided aid to support the Adequacy Budget by funding the difference between a district's Local Fair Share (LFS) and its Adequacy Budget. A district's LFS is the amount it is required to contribute in support of the Adequacy Budget. That amount is determined by adding a district's equalized property wealth and its equalized income wealth. Under SFRA, a district must provide the lesser of either its LFS, as calculated using SFRA's formula, or the local share it raised in the previous year. In short, Equalization Aid is the difference between a district's LFS and its Adequacy Budget.” Id. at 155.

The SFRA also provides districts with additional aid known

as Categorical Aid.

“Categorical Aid is a separate funding stream provided on a per-pupil basis for certain expenses. Categorical Aid covers: (1) one-third of census-based costs for special education; (2) security; (3) preschool aid; (4) extraordinary aid for special

15

education; and (5) various additional aid categories.” Id. at 155.

Categorical and extraordinary special education aid is

provided by N.J.S.A 18A:7F-55; security aid by N.J.S.A 18A:7F-

56; and preschool aid by N.J.S.A 18A:7F-54. The various

additional aid categories the “formula also provides for [are]

transportation aid, choice aid, and debt service on the basis

of per-pupil categorical aid factors.” Id. at 155.(N.J.S.A

18A:7F-57, N.J.S.A 18A:7F-62 and N.J.S.A 18A:7G-9

respectively.)

One-third of the SFRA expense to educate each special

education child is funded as Categorical Aid. It is not part

of the SFRA Adequacy Budget and therefore not subject to the

deduction of the Local Fair Share in determining equalization

aid. Nonetheless, it is important to include this expense in

determining the cost of T & E. “To determine whether a

district is over or under adequacy, the DOE compares the sum

of a district's adequacy budget plus Special Education

Categorical Aid and Security Aid to the district's spending in

the current year.” Abbott v. Burke (Abbott XXI), 206 N.J. 332,

433 ft. nt. 35 (N.J., 2011).

A. RESPONDENTS CALCULATE THE ADEQUACY BUDGET IN LAKEWOOD AS $119 MILLION BASED ON THE NUMBER OF CHILDREN ENROLLED IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS.

16

Respondents calculated the Adequacy Budget for the Lakewood

School District in 2016 as $119,334,752 (Appendix 1, Column

22, hereafter 1:22). This amount is based on the number of

children attending the public schools. It does not take

account of the number of nonpublic school children served by

the district. The SFRA makes no provision for counting

nonpublic school students in determining adequacy. If we

include the $2,975,869 (1:49) in special education categorical

aid and the $2,161,835 in security aid (1:50) the total amount

needed to meet Respondents’ measure of adequacy is

$124,472,456. The Operating Budget of the Lakewood School

District is $120,830,423. Based on these two figures, Lakewood

appears to be more or less providing its students with an

adequate education.

B. RESPONDENTS FAIL TO INCLUDE THE COST OF PROVIDING TRANSPORTATION AND A FREE AND APPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOR SPECIAL NEEDS CHILDREN IN A BASE POPULATION FIVE TIMES THE NUMBER OF CHILDREN COUNTED IN THE CALCULATION OF ADEQUACY.

Currently, 6,020 students attend Lakewood Public Schools

(1:4). Adequacy is calculated for Lakewood solely using the

number of students enrolled in the public schools even though

31,000 K-12 students attend schools in Lakewood and are

eligible for district services. All 31,000 children are

entitled to evaluation and a Free and Appropriate Public

Education should they have special needs under the child find

17

provisions of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

of 2004. “All children with disabilities residing in the

State, including . . . children with disabilities attending

private schools, regardless of the severity of their

disabilities, and who are in need of special education and

related services, are identified, located, and evaluated. . .

.” 20 U.S. Code § 1412. All 31,000 children, including

nonpublic students, are entitled to remote transportation if

they live 2 miles away from their elementary school and 2 ½

miles away from their secondary school consistent with

N.J.S.A. 18A:39-1.

The Lakewood School District is mandated to provide 19,904

students with remote transportation (Exhibit B, Page 53). The

transportation cost to the district submitted in the Requests

for Admissions is $17,972,788 (1:25). Evidence of Lakewood’s

and the various other districts’ transportation expenses was

collected from each district’s User Friendly Budget line item

“Undist. Expend.-Student Transportation.” This the expense for

transportation of regular education students. Apparently, the

budgeted expense for Lakewood was too low. The actual expense

is $19,659,741 for regular education children. Some of this

expense includes discretionary non-remote hazardous

transportation pursuant to N.J.S.A. 18A:39-1.5. If we include

18

the mandated transportation expense of special education

children, the total transportation expense is $24,522,201.

Lakewood spends 20.5% of its adequacy budget of $119,334,752

on transportation of regular education and special education

students.

The disproportionately high expense for a district of only

6,020 children is due to the unique demography of Lakewood in

which less than one-fifth of the 31,000 resident K-12 children

attend the public schools. Had the SFRA included all 31,000

children in its calculation of adequacy, the expense would

have been much less disproportionate. Paterson, with 27,310

students enrolled in the public schools (1:4), spends

$18,590,554 on transporting regular education children (1:25)

out of an adequacy budget of $526,053,418 (1:22) or 3.5%.

An even larger deduction out of the budget comes from

providing a Free and Appropriate Education to children with

extraordinary needs in the base population of 31,000 children.

Many school districts are not equipped with the facilities

necessary to handle their most severely handicapped resident

children. The cost often runs into the millions. For example,

Patterson, with 27,310 children, sends 254 students to schools

for children with special needs (1:64). Lakewood, with over

31,000 children, sends 260 students to schools for children

19

with special needs. The drain on the budget is $29,448,564

out of an adequacy budget of $119,334,752 and an operating

budget of $120,830,423. The cost of transportation and

tuition together is $53,970,765. This is 44.7% of the

Lakewood operating budget.

Out of the nonpublic population of 25,000 children, 3,547

who have been found eligible to receive special education

services remain in nonpublic schools (AP:68). The number of

special education students enrolled in the public schools is

1,128 (1:5). Together, close to 4,700 children in Lakewood

have special needs. The User Friendly Budgets show and

Respondents constructively admit that the Lakewood cost of

Speech, Occupational Therapy, Physical Therapy and Related

Services; Other Support Services, and the Child Study Team, is

$9,289,304 (1:73). This cost together with the cost of tuition

and the cost of transporting regular education and special

education students is $63,260,069 consuming 52.4% of

the operating budget of $120,830,423.

Needless to mention, the limited resources available in a

district serving a population of over 31,000 children with an

adequacy budget designed for 6,020 children has led to

increased litigation. Respondents’ own data and their

constructive admission shows that Lakewood spends $131 per

20

pupil for legal services, the most of any large district.

(1:46).

The SFRA does not contemplate expenses of such magnitude

and their effect on T & E in Lakewood because it fails to

count all the children in its adequacy formula. Certainly many

districts suffer insufficient state aid for transportation and

extraordinary special education expenses but the deficiency in

those districts is offset by a proportional and commensurate

regular public school student count in the T & E budget.

Lakewood, by contrast, serves a base of 31,000 resident

children while its SFRA student count is 6,020.

The drain on a budget designed for 6,020 students is

certain to increase leading to more deficits as the population

increases. Lakewood births have risen over the last twenty

years with 3,966 births in 2011 compared to 2,663 births in

Paterson, 4,440 in Jersey City and 4,353 in Newark. (Page 15,

Appendix 3). The number of children attending nonpublic

schools has increased 20% in just the last two years. The

amount of funding remaining for the public schools will

significantly decrease unless Respondents change their

methodology of calculating adequacy in Lakewood.

This, of course, is common knowledge. In a CD recording

submitted by Participant Paul L. Tractenberg on March 25,

21

2015, Respondents’ State Monitor, “Mr. Azzara[,] makes

explicit that the Lakewood School District has a revenue

problem not a spending problem.” (Letter Brief of participant

in Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss, page 5). That is not

the only time that Respondents proverbially threw up their

hands in despair. On January 12, 2016, another state monitor,

David Shafter, announced that as of June 30, 2016, the

Lakewood School District will have a $12,389,288 deficit

(Exhibit C, page 50).

This most recent deficit comes after Respondents’ state

monitors controlled the Lakewood district’s finances for two

years. The document included as Exhibit C was not available to

Petitioners when they submitted their Requests for Admissions

in December 2015. Reduction of this deficit will likely

require elimination of more public school courses, staff and

programs before the end of the budgetary year.

C. THE FAILURE TO INCLUDE THE EXPENSE OF SERVING THE UNIQUE DEMOGRAPHY OF LAKEWOOD IN THE CALCULATION OF ADEQUACY HAS CAUSED SIGNIFICANT BUDGETARY DEFICITS, LOW TEACHER SALARIES, THE ELIMINATION OF COURSES AND PROGRAMS, AND UNACCEPTABLY LOW TEST SCORES AND LOW ENROLLMENT IN POST-SECONDARY INSTITUTIONS.

The drain on the budget has made it impossible for the

district to provide its public school students with T & E.

Petitioners allege that the district does not provide its

special education students with adequate special education and

22

Limited English Proficiency support (Amended Petition,

paragraphs 18-22, hereafter AP:18-22), intervention and

remediation specialists (AP:23), its teachers with in-house

curriculum supervisors (AP:26), closed down its industrial

arts program (AP:28), decimated its rich curriculum (AP: 29)

and has oversized classes (AP:31).

Respondents’ own data and their constructive admission show

that the 2015-16 Budgetary Comparative Per Pupil Cost in

Lakewood is $12,348, the average of Abbott districts is

$17,793, and the average of all New Jersey districts is

$15,348. (1:34). Respondents’ own data and their constructive

admission show that the 2015-16 Total Classroom Instruction

Cost Per Pupil in Lakewood is $6,600, the average of Abbott

districts is $10,017, and the average of all New Jersey

districts is $8,933 (1:35). Respondents’ own data and their

constructive admission show that Lakewood has the lowest

average and lowest median teacher salary of 103 large K-12

districts with 3,500 or more students. (1:37,38,40,41).


that the average teacher experience in Lakewood is 8.3 years

compared with the 11.8 median of all New Jersey districts.


that the ratio of students to teachers in Lakewood is 13.1

23

whereas the average ratio of students to teachers in Abbott

districts is 11.3. (1:42). Respondents’ own data and their

constructive admission show that Lakewood spends $128 for

classroom supplies per student, the 3 lowest ranking large

district, whereas the average Abbott district spends $384 and

the statewide average is $321(1:44).

This has led to such dismal underachievement and failure to

prepare students for post-secondary education that

constitutional standard of providing T & E cannot possible

have been met. Respondents’ own data and their constructive

admission show that the High School Proficiency Assessment

Language Arts scores for Lakewood from 2008-2014 were lower

than the average and median scores of the Abbott districts and

significantly lower than the state average. (Appendix 4, Page

26; hereafter Apx.4,26). Respondents’ own data and their

constructive admission show that the High School Proficiency

Assessment Mathematics scores for Lakewood were about half the

points of the state average and more than ten points lower

than the average and median Abbott districts every year since

2009 (Apx.4,27). Respondents’ own data and their constructive

admission show that the Grade 8 GEPA and NJ ASK Language Arts

scores for Lakewood was below the average and median score for

the Abbott districts every year since 2004. (Apx.5,32).

24


that the Grade 8 GEPA and NJ ASK Mathematics scores for

Lakewood students were below the average and median scores for

the Abbott districts every year since 2006 (Apx.5,33).


the Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate was at or below the

average (mean) and the median of the Abbott districts for the

last four years (Apx.6,39). Respondents’ own data and their

constructive admission show the average composite SAT score

for Lakewood is 1101 whereas the Abbott average is 1191 and

the state average is 1514. (Apx.2,22 Column C). Respondents’

own data and their constructive admission show only 45.6%

Lakewood students are in post-secondary institutions 16 months

after graduation whereas the Abbott average is 62.7%.

(Apx.2,22 Column I).

The evidence before this Court of lack of funding in

Lakewood and the resulting underachievement all point to the

conclusion that Respondents have failed to provide the

constitutional required system of thorough and efficient

public schools in Lakewood.

“We therefore adhere to the conventional wisdom that money is one of the many factors that counts. Staff ratios, breadth of course offerings, teacher experience and qualifications, and availability of equipment make a real difference in educational opportunity. We do not mean that money guarantees a

25

thorough and efficient education, nor that, given the approach recommended by the Commissioner, a lower spending district with an effective schools program will not do better than a higher spending district without it. All we mean is that if ‘effective schools’ is a desirable approach, it should be superimposed on a structure that starts out equal.” Abbott by Abbott v. Burke (Abbott II), 119 N.J. 287, 381 (N.J., 1990)

POINT II. RESPONDENTS FAIL TO PROVIDE THE CHILDREN OF LAKEWOOD WITH A THOROUGH AND EFFICIENT EDUCATION BECAUSE LAKEWOOD IS A LOW-INCOME URBAN DISTRICT, STUDENTS IN LOW-INCOME URBAN DISRICTS REQUIRE MORE FUNDING THAN STUDENTS IN HIGHER INCOME OR SUBURBAN DISTRICTS, AND LAKEWOOD IS FUNDED SIGNIFICANTLY LESS THAN LOW-INCOME URBAN DISTRICTS OR SUBURBAN DISTRICTS RESULTING IN UNACCEPTABLY LOW STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT.

A. LAKEWOOD IS A LOW-INCOME URBAN DISTRICT.

Lakewood is a low-income urban district and is recognized

by Respondents as a peer of the Abbott districts for the

purpose of comparison in Respondents’ school report cards. One

hundred forty seven schools from almost every Abbott district

are listed as peers of Lakewood schools. Only four non-Abbott

DFG A or B schools are listed as peers of any Lakewood school.

(Apx.7, 41-45).

The 2010 Census counted 92,843 in Lakewood. The population

of Lakewood, estimated now at 108,900, is more than twice the

median population of the Abbott districts (AP:35). Lakewood’s

population is expected to reach 225,000 by 2030 (AP ft.1).

The population density of Lakewood Census Designated Place

(CDP), the area in which almost all public and nonpublic

26

students live, according to the 2010 Census is 7,602, about

seven times the state average but slightly less than the

Abbott median. (1:95).

The percent of the population 17 and under in Lakewood CDP

is 48.4% compared to the Abbott average of 24.6% (1:92). The

Lakewood labor force of 28,809 (1:88) is only 30.3% of the

2010 population whereas the labor force of the average urban

district is 38.1% and of New Jersey is 51.3%. This means that

only 30 working people provide for the shelter and sustenance

of every 100 people in Lakewood.

Lakewood is ranked 555 out of 564 New Jersey municipalities

in per capita income (1:3). Per capita income in Lakewood is

$16,430. The average Abbott district’s per capita income is

$22,585. Per capita income in the state as whole is $39,940.

This means that Lakewood per capita income is just 41.1% of

the state average. In the Abbott administrative decision,

Judge Lefelt found that the “plaintiffs’ districts have per

capita income that ranges from 49% to 81% of the State average

per capita income, and urban aid cities have, on average, 72%

of the State average.” Abbott v. Burke, EDU5581-85 (initial

decision), August 24, 1988

http//:njlegallib.rutgers.edu/legallib/njar/v13/p0001.pdf

(hereafter Lefelt) at 265. The per capita income of Lakewood

27

CDP is $11,895, or 29.8% of the State average. The median

family income in Lakewood CDP is $38,493 compared to $50,995

in the Abbott districts and $114,265 statewide. The average

family size in Lakewood CDP is 5.23. The average Abbott

district family size is 3.33 (1:94). Hence, $38,493 supports

the average family of 5.23 members. 93.6% of Lakewood public

school students are classified as low-income whereas the

average of the Abbott districts is 76.0% (1:8). 25.9% of

Lakewood public school students are classified as Limited

English Proficiency whereas the average of the Abbott

districts is 10.0% (1:10). 83.4% of 2015 Lakewood public

school students are Hispanic and 10% are African-American

(Request for Admissions, paragraph 1). Many minority children

come to school with disadvantages far beyond their white

counterparts. “Indeed, the term ‘urban schools’ has become a

euphemism for minority schools. . . . [T]he urban public

school population often contains a higher minority percentage

than is present in the surrounding municipality.” Lefelt at

26-27.

The evidence shows that Lakewood is in fact a low-income

urban district.

B. STUDENTS IN LOW-INCOME URBAN DISTRICTS REQUIRE MORE FUNDING THAN HIGHER INCOME OR SUBURBAN DISTRICTS.

28

Lakewood students face all the challenges, if not more,

than students in low-income urban districts. The Abbott II

Court made clear that student coming from low-income urban

districts require more resources to even the playing field.

“[W]e conclude that a significant number of poorer urban districts do not provide a thorough and efficient education for their students; that the measurement of the constitutional requirement must account for the needs of the students; that in most poorer urban districts, the education needed to equip the students for their roles as citizens and workers exceeds that needed by students in more affluent districts; that the education provided depends to a significant extent on the money spent for it, and on what that money can buy--in quality and quantity--and the ability to innovate.” Abbott by Abbott v. Burke, 119 N.J. 287, 319 (N.J., 1990)

Student in lower income districts require more funding for

increased resources than students in the average New Jersey

district.

“If the educational fare of the seriously disadvantaged student is the same as the ‘regular education’ given to the advantaged student, those serious disadvantages will not be addressed, and students in the poorer urban districts will simply not be able to compete.” Id. at 374

The SFRA extends the reasoning of the Abbott Court to all

New Jersey districts by providing increased funding in each

district for every at-risk or low-income student and for every

LEP student in its calculation of adequacy.1

1 At-risk is defined by N.J.S.A. 18A:7F-45 as “those resident pupils from households with a household income at or below the most recent

29

“For each at-risk pupil, a base at-risk weight of .47 is applied. Also, as described by the Special Master, the [State Department of Education (DOE)] employed a sliding scale to recognize the additional challenges faced by districts with high concentrations of at-risk students. The sliding scale applies a base at-risk weight of .47 to the base student cost for at-risk pupils in districts with an at-risk student population between zero and 20%. The weight then increases incrementally. The scale levels off at 60%—applying a weight of .57 to at-risk pupils in districts with an at-risk population over 60%. Although the at-risk weight levels off, the districts will still receive the additional funding for each at-risk student; therefore, the formula does provide more funding to districts with higher concentrations of at-risk students. The formula applies weights also to LEP students (although the PJP panel suggested .47, SFRA applies a weight of .50) and yet another weight for students who are both at-risk and LEP to support non-duplicative resources required by such students (although calculated during the PJP process to be 22.6% of the LEP weight, SFRA uses 25%).” 199 N.J. at 154.

The weights for at-risk and LEP funding of children counted in

the adequacy budget is washed out by the costs of serving the

children that Respondents do not count.

C. LAKEWOOD IS FUNDED SUBSTANTIALLY LOWER THAN EVERY LOW-INCOME URBAN DISTRICT.

The additional SFRA funding to remedy the disadvantages of

low-income and Limited English Proficiency in each district is

federal poverty guidelines available on October 15 of the prebudget year multiplied by 1.85.” At-risk students are also known as those eligible for free or reduced lunch. “The income guidelines for determining eligibility for reduced price lunches for any school year shall be 185 percent of the applicable family size income levels. . . .” 42 U.S.C. §1758(b)(1)(B). The terms “at-risk,” “low-income” and “free and reduced lunch” designate the same pupils.

30

swallowed up in the case of Lakewood because of the expense of

serving a population in which 80% of resident children attend

nonpublic schools. This drain on the budget has drastically

harmed public school students in Lakewood. As mentioned, 93.6%

of Lakewood students are classified as at-risk or low-income,

more than the 76.0% average of the Abbott districts and the

28.5% average of all New Jersey districts (1:8). 25.9% of

Lakewood students are Limited English Proficiency, more than

the 10.0% average of the Abbott districts and the 2.0% average

of all New Jersey districts (1:10).

The evidence also shows that the 2015-16 Budgetary

Comparative Per Pupil Cost in Lakewood is $12,348, whereas the

average of all New Jersey districts is $15,348 and the Abbott

average is $17,793 (1:34). The 2015-16 Total Classroom

Instruction Cost Per Pupil in Lakewood is $6,600. The average

of the Abbott districts is $10,017 (1:35). Districts

surrounding Lakewood in all four directions, each with

substantially less than 40% of students at-risk (1:8), spend

at least 16% more per pupil: Brick $8,438, Howell $9,592,

Jackson $7,989, and Toms River Regional $7,631. Lakewood is

ranked as the lowest spending district of 103 New Jersey

districts with 3500 students or more (1:37).

31

This level of funding is unacceptable. Without any other

criteria to show compliance with the constitutional mandate,

the Supreme Court in Robinson noted, “The trial court found

the constitutional demand had not been met and did so on the

basis of discrepancies in dollar input per pupil. We agree.”

Robinson v. Cahill, 62 N.J. 473, 515 (N.J., 1973).

This Court need not rely solely on the evidence of low

funding. Respondents own criteria: standardized test scores,

enrollment in post-secondary education, graduation rates,

teacher salary and experience, classroom supplies, SAT scores,

all evidence compiled by Respondents, show that the

deprivation is on a constitutional scale.

POINT III. THE TAX BASE OF LAKEWOOD DOES NOT HAVE THE CAPACITY TO FILL THE DEFICIENCY IN ITS ADEQUACY BUDGET.

The adequacy budget is paid by both the state and by local

taxpayers. The state share, known as equalization aid, is the

difference between the adequacy budget and the local share

(N.J.S.A 18A:7F-52). The statute provides that half of the

local share is determined by multiplying the aggregate income

of the residents of a district by the Statewide income rate

(.0092690802 in 2008) and the other half of the local share is

determined by multiplying equalized property value by the

Statewide property value rate (.04546684 in 2008). Property

32

wealth and income are thereby reflected in equalization aid

because they determine the size of local share, which is

deducted from the adequacy budget to determine the state

share.

At the time this petition was filed, the local share for

Lakewood was $71,198,357 (AP:5). The Lakewood tax levy was

$84,693,837, 18.8% more than the local share. Since then,

Respondents raised the Statewide income rate and equalized

property value rate so dramatically that the local share of

many districts in the State increased beyond their statutory

authority to increase taxes under the tax caps of N.J.S.A.

18A:7F-38. The local share of Lakewood increased to

$96,735,200. In April 2015 the state monitor ordered the tax

levy to be increased for the current budget year to

$90,350,168, the maximum allowable under the law. The district

had already exhausted its banked cap reserve before this

petition was filed (AP:6). This $5.7 million tax increase was

not sufficient to prevent the $12 million deficit as of the

end of the budgetary year.

The $5.7 million tax increase hit Lakewood families hard.

The Lakewood tax base, the ninth lowest in per capita income

in the State, spends $172,155,093 (1:98), 11.34% of its

aggregate income of $1,518,509,794 (1:99), on municipal,

33

school and county taxes. Statewide, taxpayers spend 8.53% of

their income on municipal, school and county taxes. Taxpayers

in the Abbott district, noted for their overburden of excess

municipal expenses, spend only 9.30%.

The traditional depiction of municipal overburden made much

ado about the higher school, municipal and county taxes in the

low-income urban areas. These taxes already consume a larger

percent of income in Lakewood than in the Abbott districts,

yet they only account for about half of the burden of families

making up the Lakewood tax base. The financial strain of

sending over 25,000 children to nonpublic schools, of course,

falls solely on Lakewood families. Together with municipal,

school and county taxes, approximately one-quarter of all

income in the tax base is consumed. Considering that there is

only one worker for every four residents, that 41.8% of the

entire population in the tax base is 17 and under, and that

the median family income is among the lowest in the state, the

municipal overburden on Lakewood taxpayers is beyond the pale.

Local taxpayers do not have, and have not had, the capacity to

prevent the expenses of transportation and special education

services from draining programs, staff and curriculum out of

the public schools over the last decade.

34

To add insult to injury, Respondents removed Lakewood from

its District Factor Group (DFG) ratings because a majority of

children attend nonpublic schools. 70% of nonpublic school

students in Lakewood receive federal free and reduced lunch

and would be funded as at-risk had they been public school

students (Ex.B,47). In fact, had all 25,000 nonpublic children

attended the public schools, the local share would remain the

same $96 million but the SFRA adequacy budget would increase

to over $550 million (AP:41). Respondents’ share would be over

$450 million of the adequacy budget. Lakewood would be a DFG

A, the lowest income rating for state districts. Since the

vast majority of children in reality attend nonpublic schools,

70% of whom are low-income, a district that Respondents would

have otherwise considered to be one of the lowest income in

the state had these children attended public schools, is

arbitrarily determined not worthy of low-income status.

CONCLUSION

It has been almost two years since the Petitioners brought

their petition. Since then, Respondents have done everything

possible to prevent the merits of this case from being heard.

They motioned for dismissal questioning the standing of

35

Petitioners. They opposed the participation of an amicus

curiae with decades of experience navigating the complexity of

school funding litigation. Most recently, they have barraged

Petitioners with interrogatories targeting their standing,

harassing them by asking for names of the parents’ supervisors

at work, for seven years of Petitioners’ transcripts, course

schedules, IEPs and other personal information. We still do

not know after almost two years if Respondents have any

defense to the allegations in the Petition.

If Respondents’ strategy is to somehow disqualify the

individual students named in the petition, to show that they

do not suffer any personal harm, or perhaps to delay the

litigating the merits until Petitioners graduate, then

Petitioners point out that New Jersey does not have a case and

controversy clause in its constitution. In State v. Allen, 73

N.J. 132 (N.J., 1977), the appeal of a restrictive order on

news reporters was allowed to proceed even though the same

order had been lifted by the Chief Justice. In other words,

the individual reporters named in the suit no longer suffered

harm. “Preliminarily, we reject any notion that the appeals

before us should be treated as moot and dismissed. The issues

are of great public importance and are bound to recur time and

again unless and until this Court by its decision determines

36

what a trial court may or may not do regarding news media

coverage of a public trial.” Id. at 138.

In the case at hand, even if the students named in the

Petition had seven years of low grades and poorly designed

course schedules, while the majority of the students in the

district maintained high achievement and were offered a rich

curriculum from which to choose courses, then the claims of

Petitioners would have no merit despite their own individual

harm and lack of achievement. On the other hand, if

Petitioners had high grades and exemplary course schedules

while the rest of the students collectively did poorly and had

a limited curriculum from which to choose, then the claims

made in the petition would have merit. In such case, if

necessary, Counsel would simply change petitioners. But that

is not necessary under the law of this state, particularly

where the “issues are of great public importance and are bound

to recur time and again. . . .”

Petitioners came to this Court primarily to create a record

of constitutional deprivation for the Superior Court so that

ultimately the legislature will correct the adequacy formula

as applied to Lakewood. It should be noted, that under the

SFRA, Respondents’ share of Lakewood’s current adequacy budget

of $119,334,752, after deducting the local share of

37

$96,735,200, is $22,599,552. However, due to statewide

budgetary freezes, Lakewood has received only $15 million for

the last three several years (Exhibit C, page 52). This is

because Respondents have not fully funded the SFRA since 2010.

Although the $7.6 million shortfall would not come close to

filling the $52 million deficiency and would not even begin to

restore the public schools to T & E, just as the $5.6 million

tax increase did not prevent the current year’s $12 million

deficit, it might prevent more loss. This Court and the

Commissioner have the authority to authorize full funding as

an interim measure until the legislature fixes the formula.

The Supreme Court ordered Respondents to fully fund the Abbott

districts because they had "status akin to that given to wards

of the State." Abbott v. Burke (Abbott XXI), 206 N.J. 332,340

(2011). Lakewood faces this $12 million deficit going into

next year’s budget and its students face the same challenges

of the urban Abbott districts. There is no reason why a court

cannot order full funding under the current law as an interim

remedy, at the very least, to prevent further cuts when the

budget is prepared in April 2016.

The State has controlled the finances of Lakewood for two

years. The finances have only grown worse. The problem is not

mismanagement. The discrepancy between how Respondents

38

calculate adequacy under the present system and the reality in

Lakewood has increased every year. “Were we confident that a

thorough and efficient education were likely to be achieved in

the near future under the present system, we would not dream

of intervening.” 119 N.J. at 321. The constitutional

deprivation in Lakewood will only get worse unless a court

intervenes.

The facts in this case are a matter of public record and

not subject to controversy. Despite the historic complexity of

school funding litigation, the issues to be decided in this

case are relatively simple. The method of determining the

necessary funding for education adequacy in Lakewood is so

obviously miscalculated that a decision can be rendered on the

papers. If, on the other hand, should this Court find, in

viewing the facts most favorable toward the unmoving party,

genuine issues of material facts do exist, a decision can be

made determining the issues to be decided facilitating the

resolution of this matter. This is entirely appropriate.

According to N.J.A.C. § 1:1-12.5 (d)

“If, on motion under this section, a decision is not rendered upon all the substantive issues in the contested case and a hearing is necessary, the judge at the time of ruling on the motion, by examining the papers on file in the case as well as the motion papers, and by interrogating counsel, if necessary, shall, if practicable, ascertain what material facts exist without substantial controversy and shall

39

thereupon enter an order specifying those facts and directing such further proceedings in the contested case as are appropriate. At the hearing in the contested case, the facts so specified shall be deemed established.”

WHEREFORE Petitioners respectfully move for summary decision

determining:

1. Lakewood is a low-income urban district.

2. The educational needs of Lakewood public school students

are greater than the educational needs of students in higher

income non-urban districts.

3. The funding necessary to provide for the educational

needs of Lakewood public school students exceeds the funding

necessary to provide for the educational needs of students in

higher income non-urban districts.

4. The School Finance Reform Act of 2008 (SFRA) calculates

the funding necessary to meet the needs of the 6,020 public

school students in Lakewood but does not account for the costs

of transportation and special education serving a population

of 31,000 school age children in Lakewood.

5. The failure to include the cost of serving 31,000 school

age children, currently $52 million a year, in an adequacy

budget designed for 6,020 students has led to recurring

budgetary deficits, termination of academic and vocational

courses, staff and programs, and a general inability to

40

adequately address the educational needs of public school

students in Lakewood.

6. The money actually spent on the educational needs of

students in Lakewood pubic schools is less than the amount of

money spent on the educational needs of students in non-urban

districts.

7. The academic achievement of students in Lakewood is lower

than the achievement of students in non-urban districts and as

low or lower than students in low-income urban districts.

8. Lakewood students are less prepared for college, for the

job market, for participation in society and in the life of

their community than students in non-urban districts and as

low or lower than students in low-income urban districts.

9. The State of New Jersey is not providing students in

Lakewood with a constitutionally adequate thorough and

efficient public education because its method of calculating

adequate funding fails to account for $52 million a year in

expenditures serving a K-12 population six times the size of

the public school enrollment.

10. The Lakewood tax base does not have the capacity to fill

the deficiency in the amount necessary for adequate funding.

41

11. The adequacy budget for Lakewood should be calculated to

include the cost of providing mandated transportation and

special education services.

12. In the alternative, Respondents should fully appropriate

the adequacy budget and the local share should fully

appropriate the cost of transportation and tuition for special

education.

13. The administrative forum is primarily charged with

presenting a record and making recommendations as to whether

the State of New Jersey is providing a constitutionally

adequate education for the 6,020 children attending Lakewood

public schools. The academic achievement, course schedules,

Individual Education Plans for special education students,

transcripts, employment information of parents, and other

personal information of the individual Petitioners have no

bearing on the resolution of the issues.

FURTHERMORE Petitioners respectfully request that the Court

transmit its findings of fact to the Commissioner of Education

with the following recommendations:

1. To recommend that the legislature provide for an

adjustment to the School Funding Reform Act of 2008 that will

account for all of the children in Lakewood in the calculation

42

of the adequacy budget because it is impossible to provide a

thorough and efficient education under a formula designed for

6,020 children when in reality the district serves a resident

population of 31,000 children.

2. To recommend to the legislature in the alternative to

change the School Funding Reform Act of 2008 so that the local

share of certain school districts defined to specify Lakewood

is not deducted from the adequacy budget in determining

equalization aid but rather local taxation is raised to

appropriate the cost of transportation and tuition for special

education.

3. To recommend to the governor the creation of new

categorical aid in his budget and/or to implement any and all

remedies within his authority to fill the deficiencies in the

adequacy budget of Lakewood.

4. To issue a declaratory ruling that the provision of

$15,263,034 in equalization aid is inadequate given that the

cost of mandated services to a school age population five time

the number of students counted in determining SFRA adequacy is

depleting the operating budget in Lakewood and to implement

any and all interim remedies for the state to absorb more of

the cost and to provide full equalization aid to Lakewood

43

under the SFRA as currently written for the 2016-17 school

year.


$3,600,000 in extraordinary aid is inadequate given that

extraordinary special education costs are depleting the

operating budget in Lakewood and to implement any and all

interim remedies for the state to absorb more of the cost and

to provide full extraordinary aid to Lakewood under the SFRA

as currently written for the 2016-17 school year.


$3,934,658 in transportation aid is inadequate given that

transportation costs are depleting the operating budget in

Lakewood and to implement any and all interim remedies for the

state to absorb more of the cost and provide full

transportation aid to Lakewood under the SFRA as currently

written for the 2016-17 school year.

7. To issue a declaratory ruling that the state aid growth

limitation is inapplicable to any and all administrative

remedies.

8. To recommend legislation that the state aid growth

limitation (NJSA 18A:7F-47) is inapplicable to any and all

legislative remedies.

9. To classify Lakewood as a DFG A urban district.


--------------------------------------

LEONOR ALCANTARA, individually and as Guardian ad Litem for E.A.; LESLIE JOHNSON, individually and as Guardian ad Litem for D.J.; JUANA PEREZ, individually and as Guardian ad Litem for Y.P.; TATIANA ESCOBAR individually; and IRA SCHULMAN, individually and as Guardian ad Litem for A.S.

Petitioners, v.

DAVID HESPE, COMMISSIONER OF THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION; the NEW JERSEY STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION; and the NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Respondents. --------------------------------------

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )OAL DOCKET No: ) EDU 11069-2014S ) ) Agency Ref. No.: ) 156-6/14 ) ) ) ) ) ) )

I, Arthur H. Lang, of full age, certify as follows:

1. The annexed documents are true copies of what they

purport to be.

2. Exhibit A is Petitioners’ request for admission, sent via

email on December 28, 2015, appending the appendices 1, 2, 3,

4, 5, 6 and 7. Counsel advises the Court that on Appendix 1,

the columns were numbered before submission to the Court for

the convenience of reference.

1

Exhibit A

3


--------------------------------------LEONOR ALCANTARA, individually and as Guardian ad Litem for E.A.; LESLIE JOHNSON, individually and as Guardian ad Litem for D.J.; JUANA PEREZ, individually and as Guardian ad Litem for Y.P.; TATIANA ESCOBAR individually; and IRA SCHULMAN, individually and as Guardian ad Litem for A.S.

Plaintiffs, v.

DAVID HESPE, COMMISSIONER OF THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION; the NEW JERSEY STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION; and the NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Respondents --------------------------------------

) ) ) ) )OAL DOCKET No: ) EDU 11069-2014S ) ) Agency Ref. No.: ) 156-6/14 ) )REQUEST FOR )ADMISSIONS ) ) ) ) ) ) )

To: GEOFFREY N. STARK, DAG OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY DIVISION OF LAW 25 MARKET STREET PO BOX 112 TRENTON, NJ 08625-0112

Pursuant to the provisions of N.J.A.C. 1:10-10.2, respondent is hereby requested to admit the following facts, all pertaining to the time encompassed in the charges herein and if a fact is denied, respondent is requested to explain the facts on which the denial is based:

1. 83.4% of 2015 Lakewood public school students areHispanic and 10% are African-American.

4

_____ Admitted

_____Denied because __________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

2. NCLB Title I Part A in 2014-15 provided Lakewood publicschool students with $7,164,029, and non-public school students with $8,487,874 out of $16,475,687, to serve 5,391 public school children and 22,688 non-public students of which 4,855 public school and 15,821 non-public students are low-income.

_____ Admitted

_____Denied because __________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

3. NCLB Title I Part A in 2013-14 provided Lakewood publicschool students with $9,367,786 and non-public school students with $8,666,422 out of $18,759,801, to serve 4,907 public school children and 20,902 non-public students of which 4,655 public school and 14,715 non-public students are low-income.

_____ Admitted

_____Denied because __________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

5

______________________________________________________________

4. 1,204 public school students are receiving specialeducation services as of September 2015 of which 290 are sent out-of-district.

_____ Admitted

_____Denied because __________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

5. The 2015 value of taxable property (ratables) in Lakewoodis $6,271,965,700.

_____ Admitted

_____Denied because __________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

6. The 2014 value of taxable property (ratables) in Lakewoodis $6,151,919,800.

_____ Admitted

_____Denied because __________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

6

______________________________________________________________

7. The data in Appendix 1--Low Income Urban and NeighboringDistricts 2016 is accurate. (The data entries were compiled from the following sources: PER CAPITA INCOME AND RANK is from 2010 Census data http://lwd.dol.state.nj.us/labor/lpa/industry/incpov/2010income.html;

DISTRICT PROFILES: FY 2015 and FY2016 Spreadsheets were prepared by Susan Ecks, Supervisor of State Aid Research and Data Analysis, of the NJ DOE;

2015-16 OPERATING BUDGETS, LOCAL TAX LEVY, TRANSPORTATION, TUITION AND OTHER COSTS: Obtained from User Friendly Budgets posted on each district's website; MUNICIPAL TAX INFORMATION: http://www.state.nj.us/dca/divisions/dlgs/resources/property_tax.html;

PERSONS BELOW POVERTY, MUNICIPAL DENSITY: As available in Quick Facts on the US Census website at http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/34/3430210.html; 17 AND UNDER, MEDIAN AGE, HOUSEHOLD AND FAMILY SIZES: NJ DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT http://lwd.dol.state.nj.us/labor/lpa/census/2010/gdp_index.html#stcnty;

2014 MUNICIPAL LABOR FORCE: Spreadsheet Annual Municipal Labor Force Estimates: 2010-2014 downloaded from http://lwd.dol.state.nj.us/labor/lpa/employ/uirate/lfest_index.html;

STATE AID: 2015-16 K-12 PROJECTED STATE SCHOOL AID Spreadsheet found at http://www.state.nj.us/education/stateaid/1415/;

2015 TAXPAYERS GUIDE TO EDUCATION SPENDING http://www.state.nj.us/education/guide/2015/ind.shtml;

AVERAGE OF TEACHERS' SALARIES AND YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: http://www.njspotlight.com/stories/14/08/14/interactive-map-salaries-for-nj-teachers-staff-and-administrators-dip-slightly/;

2014-15 CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION COST AND RANK, MEDIAN TEACHERS' SALARY AND RANK, RATIO OF STUDENTS TO TEACHERS AND RANK, CLASSROOM SUPPLIES TEXTBOOKS AND RANK: NJDOE TAXPAYER GUIDE TO

7

EDUCATION SPENDING: http://www.state.nj.us/education/guide/2015/ind.shtml#ind1)

_____ Admitted

_____Denied because __________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

8. The data in Appendix 2--2014 performance report Urban and

Neighboring Districts is accurate. (Data complied from

individual school reports found on DOE website).

_____ Admitted

_____Denied because __________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

9. The data in Appendix 3--Births, transportation and

tuition by year is accurate. (New Jersey Birth Certificate

Database, Office of Vital Statistics and Registry, New Jersey

Department of Health, https://www26.state.nj.us/doh-

shad/query/builder/birth/BirthPopMuni/BirthRate.html;

Transportation and Tuition from district END OF YEAR CAFRS and

8

User Friendly Budgets.)

_____ Admitted

_____Denied because __________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

10. The data compiled in Appendix 4--HSPA BY TEST YEAR is

accurate. (HSPA results complied from data on NJDOE website:

http://www.state.nj.us/education/assessment/hs/hspa/results/

and from district OPRA request)

_____ Admitted

_____Denied because __________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

11. The data compiled in Appendix 5--EIGHTH GRADE PROFICIENCY

TEST BY YEAR is accurate. (GEPA results compiled from data on

NJDOE website:

http://www.state.nj.us/education/assessment/ms/gepa/results/

NJASK results compiled from data on NJDOE website:

http://www.nj.gov/education/schools/achievement/prior.htm )

_____ Admitted

9

_____Denied because __________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

12. The data compiled in Appendix 6--Low Income Urban and

Neighboring Districts Four Year Graduation Rates is accurate.

_____ Admitted

_____Denied because __________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

13. The data in Appendix 6--Low Income Urban and Neighboring

Districts Four Year Graduation Rates is accurate.

_____ Admitted

_____Denied because __________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

14. The information in Appendix 7--Peer Schools is accurate.

_____ Admitted

_____Denied because __________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

10

______________________________________________________________

SIGNATURE LINE: _______________________________________

Dated:

11

Appendix1

12

COUNTY DFG

PERCAPITAINCOMEUSCENSUS2010

PERCAPITAINCOMERANKof564NJMUNI-CIPAL-ITIES

RESIDENTIALENROLLMENT(ENR)

PUBLICSPECIALEDPUPILS

SPECED%OFENR

PUBLICLOWINCOMEPUPILS

LOWINCOME%OFENR

LIMITEDENGLISHPROFICIENCY(LEP)

LEP%OFENR.

LEPLOWINCOME

LEPLOWINCOME%OFENR

FY2016LOCALFAIRSHARE

2015-16LOCALTAXLEVY

TAXLEVY/ENR

2015-16LOCALEFFORT

LOWINCOMEURBANDISTRICTSCUMBERLAND BRIDGETONCITY A $12,418 564 5,385 530 9.8% 4,967 92.2% 1,132 21.0% 1,078 20.0% $9,625,854 $3,637,144 $675 $5,178,460CAMDEN CAMDENCITY A $12,807 563 15,265 2,798 18.3% 13,601 89.1% 1,285 8.4% 1,084 7.1% $28,068,813 $7,449,009 $488 $10,786,200PASSAIC PASSAICCITY A $14,424 562 13,674 2,134 15.6% 13,080 95.7% 3,504 25.6% 3,422 25.0% $47,311,355 $16,818,577 $1,230 $17,737,957PASSAIC PATERSONCITY A $15,543 560 27,310 3,852 14.1% 22,376 81.9% 3,623 13.3% 2,764 10.1% $97,149,177 $38,955,956 $1,426 $42,466,070MIDDLESEX NEWBRUNSWICKCITY A $16,395 556 9,036 1,402 15.5% 8,554 94.7% 1,667 18.4% 1,507 16.7% $39,399,366 $27,862,800 $3,084 $28,562,800OCEAN LAKEWOODTWP $16,430 555 6,020 1,128 18.7% 5,632 93.6% 1,561 25.9% 1,433 23.8% $96,735,200 $90,350,168 $15,008 $91,024,977OCEAN LAKEWOODCENSUSDESIGNATEDPLACE $11,895ESSEX NEWARKCITY A $17,367 554 49,687 7,569 15.2% 36,596 73.7% 4,073 8.2% 2,914 5.9% $183,863,588 $115,650,165 $2,328 $122,107,444MERCER TRENTONCITY A $17,400 553 13,997 2,425 17.3% 12,251 87.5% 1,703 12.2% 1,477 10.6% $41,692,620 $21,115,662 $1,509 $22,115,662SALEM SALEMCITY A $17,733 552 950 189 19.9% 813 85.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% $2,904,245 $2,392,321 $2,520 $3,787,547HUDSON UNIONCITY A $18,506 549 11,688 1,364 11.7% 10,997 94.1% 2,865 24.5% 2,736 23.4% $48,593,609 $15,418,637 $1,319 $15,568,637ATLANTIC PLEASANTVILLECITY A $18,527 548 3,586 572 16.0% 3,099 86.4% 386 10.8% 337 9.4% $13,079,411 $8,311,512 $2,318 $9,265,163ESSEX EASTORANGE A $20,298 540 10,060 1,539 15.3% 8,196 81.5% 289 2.9% 259 2.6% $44,660,845 $18,950,050 $1,884 $19,725,050UNION ELIZABETHCITY A $19,196 546 23,901 2,794 11.7% 20,846 87.2% 3,963 16.6% 3,532 14.8% $98,295,965 $59,813,124 $2,503 $60,687,303ESSEX CITYOFORANGETWP A $19,816 544 5,154 880 17.1% 4,339 84.2% 611 11.9% 517 10.0% $21,661,608 $11,692,295 $2,269 $12,002,295MIDDLESEX PERTHAMBOYCITY A $20,162 541 9,957 1,068 10.7% 7,678 77.1% 1,843 18.5% 1,561 15.7% $43,047,549 $21,762,553 $2,186 $22,011,586MONMOUTH ASBURYPARKCITY A $20,368 538 2,376 525 22.1% 1,913 80.5% 211 8.9% 174 7.3% $16,502,549 $6,635,736 $2,793 $6,653,380ESSEX IRVINGTONTOWNSHIP A $20,520 536 7,314 942 12.9% 5,730 78.3% 845 11.6% 659 9.0% $37,723,297 $17,459,529 $2,387 $17,959,529MONMOUTH KEANSBURGBORO A $21,246 530 1,359 312 23.0% 934 68.7% 38 2.8% 37 2.7% $8,204,527 $4,868,294 $3,582 $4,924,838WARREN PHILLIPSBURGTOWN B $21,291 529 2,500 486 19.4% 1,747 69.9% 110 4.4% 101 4.0% $12,550,417 $10,728,711 $4,291 $26,941,777HUDSON HARRISONTOWN B $21,857 527 2,021 328 16.2% 1,636 81.0% 137 6.8% 124 6.1% $16,256,355 $9,229,913 $4,567 $11,640,113CAMDEN GLOUCESTERCITY B $22,718 522 1,810 350 19.3% 1,311 72.4% 42 2.3% 40 2.2% $8,751,000 $4,210,000 $2,326 $5,182,058CUMBERLAND MILLVILLECITY A $23,364 516 4,957 997 20.1% 3,253 65.6% 61 1.2% 57 1.2% $26,258,781 $11,319,609 $2,284 $19,067,956UNION PLAINFIELDCITY B $23,767 514 8,981 1,353 15.1% 7,983 88.9% 2,653 29.5% 2,493 27.8% $41,356,707 $22,731,000 $2,531 $23,027,565BERGEN GARFIELDCITY B $24,022 512 4,905 872 17.8% 3,274 66.7% 235 4.8% 144 2.9% $30,296,266 $25,989,445 $5,299 $26,939,445HUDSON WESTNEWYORKTOWN A $24,419 508 7,303 1,046 14.3% 6,099 83.5% 823 11.3% 625 8.6% $42,681,660 $14,860,598 $2,035 $14,960,598CUMBERLAND VINELANDCITY A $24,512 506 9,853 1,606 16.3% 6,835 69.4% 767 7.8% 703 7.1% $63,736,430 $22,166,068 $2,250 $23,640,205BURLINGTON BURLINGTONCITY B $24,612 503 1,368 286 20.9% 853 62.4% 25 1.8% 19 1.4% $9,741,821 $10,899,878 $7,968 $14,090,477BURLINGTON PEMBERTONTWP B $26,240 475 4,411 748 17.0% 2,089 47.4% 47 1.1% 26 0.6% $23,198,586 $12,942,946 $2,934 $13,643,696MONMOUTH LONGBRANCHCITY B $30,381 395 4,902 591 12.1% 4,023 82.1% 639 13.0% 586 12.0% $51,681,518 $37,901,052 $7,732 $38,256,052HUDSON JERSEYCITY B $30,490 388 31,134 4,486 14.4% 22,136 71.1% 2,774 8.9% 2,009 6.5% $335,745,966 $112,161,139 $3,603 $114,126,625MONMOUTH NEPTUNETWP CD $30,656 382 3,812 122 3.2% 268 7.0% 21 0.6% 20 0.5% $45,045,336 $36,035,649 $9,454 $41,110,984HUDSON HOBOKENCITY FG $69,085 29 2,470 318 12.9% 1,276 51.7% 26 1.1% 13 0.5% $187,075,236 $41,004,666 $16,601 $41,794,290

AVERAGELOWINCOMEURBANDISTRICTS $22,585 505 9,714 1,435 15.7% 7,701.7 76.0% 1,174.1 10.0% 1,000.6 8.8% $54,069,692 $24,870,130 $3,496 $26,966,508MEDIANLOWINCOMEURBANDISTRICTS $20,520 536 5,385 942 15.6% 4,967.0 81.0% 639.0 8.9% 586.0 7.1% $39,399,366 $16,818,577 $2,387 $19,067,956STANDARDDEVIATIONLOWINCOMEDISTRICTS $9,810 101 10,574 1,563 4.0% $8,251 17.4% $1,330 8.0% $1,132 7.6% $68,328,162 $27,115,552 $3,191 $27,669,500SUMLOWINCOMEDISTRICTS 301,123 44,484 14.8% 238,753 79.3% 36,398 12.1% 31,018 10.3% $1,676,160,457 $770,974,038 $2,560 $835,961,762

NJPERCAPITASUMOFALLNJDISTRICTSANDMUNICIPALITIES $39,940 1,357,267 202,857 14.9% 522,578 38.5% 64,837 4.8% 49,937 3.7% $17,098,258,876

MEANOFNJDISTRICTSANDMUNI. 2,297 343 15.3% 884 28.5% 110 2.0% 84 1.9% $29,996,945MEDIANNJDISTRICTSANDMUNI. 1,165 168 15.1% 203 22.0% 11 0.6% 6 0.5% $17,228,195STAND.DEV. 3,391 542 4.1% 2,604 24.6% 426 3.8% 347 3.8% $37,190,174

OCEAN LAKEWOODTWP $16,430 555 6,020 1,128 18.7% 5,632 93.6% 1,561 25.9% 1,433 23.8% $96,735,200 $90,350,168 $15,008 $91,024,977OCEAN BRICKTWP DE $33,258 325 9,169 1,694 18.5% 2,841 31.0% 162 1.8% 132 1.4% $135,153,356 $97,622,590 $10,648 $99,049,087MONMOUTH HOWELLTWP FG $35,439 280 6,085 942 15.5% 1,017 16.7% 110 1.8% 67 1.1% $62,967,187 $68,864,597 $11,317 $70,187,463OCEAN JACKSONTWP DE $34,521 295 8,784 1,238 14.1% 1,928 22.0% 79 0.9% 60 0.7% $94,823,415 $77,701,924 $8,846 $78,440,658OCEAN TOMSRIVERREGIONAL DE $33,423 321 15,820 2,246 14.2% 4,425 28.0% 140 0.9% 90 0.6% $201,605,057 $137,569,026 $8,696 $139,227,030OCEAN TOMSRIVERCDP 33,105

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

13

LOWINCOMEURBANDISTRICTSBRIDGETONCITYCAMDENCITYPASSAICCITYPATERSONCITYNEWBRUNSWICKCITYLAKEWOODTWPLAKEWOODCENSUSDESIGNATEDPLACENEWARKCITYTRENTONCITYSALEMCITYUNIONCITYPLEASANTVILLECITYEASTORANGEELIZABETHCITYCITYOFORANGETWPPERTHAMBOYCITYASBURYPARKCITYIRVINGTONTOWNSHIPKEANSBURGBOROPHILLIPSBURGTOWNHARRISONTOWNGLOUCESTERCITYMILLVILLECITYPLAINFIELDCITYGARFIELDCITYWESTNEWYORKTOWNVINELANDCITYBURLINGTONCITYPEMBERTONTWPLONGBRANCHCITYJERSEYCITYNEPTUNETWPHOBOKENCITY

AVERAGE LOWMEDIAN LOWSTANDARDSUMLOW

SUMOFALLNJDISTRICTSANDMUNICIPALITIES

MEANOFNJDISTRICTSANDMUNI.MEDIANNJDISTRICTSANDMUNI.STAND.DEV.

LAKEWOODTWPBRICKTWPHOWELLTWPJACKSONTWPTOMSRIVERREGIONALTOMSRIVERCDP

TAXLEVY/LOCALFAIRSHARE

DIFFERENCEBETWEENLOCALEFFORTANDLOCALFAIRSHARE

RATIOOFDIFFERENCEBETWEENTAXLEVYANDLOCALSHARETOLOCALSHARE

RATIOOFDIFFERENCEBETWEENTAXLEVYANDLOCALSHARETOLOCALEFFORT

2015-16OPERATINGBUDGET

2016ADEQUACYBUDGET

2015-16TUITIONCOST

TUITION/ENR

TRANSPORTATIONCOST

TRANSPCOST/ENR

2015-16TRANS-PORTATIONANDTUITION

TRANSANDTUITION/OPERBUDG.

TRANSPORTATIONANDTUITION/ENR

37.8% -$4,447,394 -62.2% -46.2% $93,768,876 $104,648,537 $4,518,129 $839 $4,229,493 $785 $8,747,622 9.3% $1,62526.5% -$17,282,613 -73.5% -61.6% $300,483,997 $293,315,255 $18,367,348 $1,203 $10,410,983 $682 $28,778,331 9.6% $1,88535.5% -$29,573,398 -64.5% -62.5% $283,100,170 $278,900,730 $29,096,086 $2,128 $7,237,075 $529 $36,333,161 12.8% $2,65740.1% -$54,683,107 -59.9% -56.3% $477,481,718 $526,053,418 $42,302,843 $1,549 $18,590,554 $681 $60,893,397 12.8% $2,23070.7% -$10,836,566 -29.3% -27.5% $168,482,568 $186,760,837 $9,230,990 $1,022 $7,477,500 $828 $16,708,490 9.9% $1,84993.4% -$5,710,223 -6.6% -5.9% $120,830,423 $119,334,752 $28,093,613 $4,667 $17,972,788 $2,986 $46,066,401 38.1% $7,652

62.9% -$61,756,144 -37.1% -33.6% $845,737,814 $962,423,619 $46,775,951 $941 $34,590,354 $696 $81,366,305 9.6% $1,63850.6% -$19,576,958 -49.4% -47.0% $257,901,771 $276,261,593 $33,878,030 $2,420 $8,235,642 $588 $42,113,672 16.3% $3,00982.4% $883,302 -17.6% 30.4% $21,518,383 $17,612,259 $1,600,866 $1,686 $730,584 $769 $2,331,450 10.8% $2,45531.7% -$33,024,972 -68.3% -68.0% $222,330,974 $250,306,432 $9,409,501 $805 $3,826,161 $327 $13,235,662 6.0% $1,13263.5% -$3,814,248 -36.5% -29.2% $76,410,954 $67,971,950 $5,513,198 $1,537 $1,952,508 $544 $7,465,706 9.8% $2,08242.4% -$24,935,795 -57.6% -55.8% $207,633,076 $195,898,656 $11,875,563 $1,181 $6,248,984 $621 $18,124,547 8.7% $1,80260.9% -$37,608,662 -39.1% -38.3% $437,238,088 $492,090,054 $34,281,862 $1,434 $16,363,744 $685 $50,645,606 11.6% $2,11954.0% -$9,659,313 -46.0% -44.6% $89,200,495 $103,985,943 $6,043,287 $1,173 $3,159,211 $613 $9,202,498 10.3% $1,78650.6% -$21,035,963 -49.4% -48.9% $299,191,734 $193,146,552 $16,448,450 $1,652 $6,087,405 $611 $22,535,855 7.5% $2,26340.2% -$9,849,169 -59.8% -59.7% $66,278,588 $44,790,872 $4,787,174 $2,015 $2,012,595 $847 $6,799,769 10.3% $2,86246.3% -$19,763,768 -53.7% -52.4% $137,529,541 $142,210,640 $17,919,946 $2,450 $6,568,550 $898 $24,488,496 17.8% $3,34859.3% -$3,279,689 -40.7% -40.0% $34,400,298 $24,373,270 $3,088,399 $2,273 $1,323,510 $974 $4,411,909 12.8% $3,24685.5% $14,391,360 -14.5% 114.7% $66,246,595 $44,312,032 $1,647,659 $659 $2,260,216 $904 $3,907,875 5.9% $1,56356.8% -$4,616,242 -43.2% -28.4% $38,903,938 $40,490,965 $3,709,888 $1,836 $997,950 $494 $4,707,838 12.1% $2,32948.1% -$3,568,942 -51.9% -40.8% $40,874,672 $32,758,261 $2,537,807 $1,402 $976,000 $539 $3,513,807 8.6% $1,94143.1% -$7,190,825 -56.9% -27.4% $90,183,729 $84,758,894 $3,786,587 $764 $3,882,969 $783 $7,669,556 8.5% $1,54755.0% -$18,329,142 -45.0% -44.3% $160,776,424 $187,867,499 $10,168,563 $1,132 $5,178,521 $577 $15,347,084 9.5% $1,70985.8% -$3,356,821 -14.2% -11.1% $87,741,972 $91,082,349 $5,867,619 $1,196 $2,125,717 $433 $7,993,336 9.1% $1,63034.8% -$27,721,062 -65.2% -64.9% $111,909,229 $149,829,479 $6,079,510 $832 $1,900,360 $260 $7,979,870 7.1% $1,09334.8% -$40,096,225 -65.2% -62.9% $170,511,207 $173,853,434 $6,126,939 $622 $10,498,332 $1,065 $16,625,271 9.8% $1,687111.9% $4,348,656 11.9% 44.6% $33,451,640 $23,611,785 $2,582,549 $1,888 $807,846 $591 $3,390,395 10.1% $2,47855.8% -$9,554,890 -44.2% -41.2% $103,606,323 $72,093,084 $3,448,130 $782 $4,621,772 $1,048 $8,069,902 7.8% $1,82973.3% -$13,425,466 -26.7% -26.0% $83,186,640 $95,682,831 $2,595,801 $530 $2,821,344 $576 $5,417,145 6.5% $1,10533.4% -$221,619,341 -66.6% -66.0% $567,025,112 $601,290,845 $19,710,007 $633 $13,723,721 $441 $33,433,728 5.9% $1,07480.0% -$3,934,352 -20.0% -8.7% $78,250,113 $67,414,051 $7,022,257 $1,842 $2,645,351 $694 $9,667,608 12.4% $2,53621.9% -$145,280,946 -78.1% -77.7% $53,466,416 $43,400,969 $1,801,889 $730 $1,313,468 $532 $3,115,357 5.8% $1,261

54.1% -27,103,183.7 -45.9% -34.9% $184,026,550 $189,328,939 $12,007,188 $1,328 $6,219,304 $665 $18,226,492 0.1 $1,99350.6% -13,425,466.0 -49.4% -44.3% $103,606,323 $104,648,537 $6,079,510 $1,196 $3,882,969 $621 $9,202,498 0.1 $1,84920.4% $45,987,673 20.4% 38.3% $184,360,094 $207,189,306 $12,596,042 $571 $6,979,844 $194 $18,947,733 $0 $61846.0% -840,198,695 -54.0% -50.1% $5,704,823,055 $5,869,197,095 $372,222,828 $1,236 $192,798,420 $640 $565,021,248 9.9% $1,876

93.4% -$5,710,223 -6.6% -5.9% $120,830,423 $119,334,752 $28,093,613 $4,667 $17,972,788 $2,986 $46,066,401 38.1% $7,65272.2% -$36,104,269 -27.8% -26.7% $140,472,182 $135,112,603 $6,380,458 $696 $8,048,580 $878 $14,429,038 10.3% $1,574109.4% $7,220,276 9.4% 11.5% $108,572,128 $83,452,944 $989,825 $163 $7,092,771 $1,166 $8,082,596 7.4% $1,32881.9% -$16,382,757 -18.1% -17.3% $134,168,942 $121,399,946 $3,161,409 $360 $9,708,096 $1,105 $12,869,505 9.6% $1,46568.2% -$62,378,027 -31.8% -30.9% $218,972,877 $225,424,120 $4,305,719 $272 $12,794,944 $809 $17,100,663 7.8% $1,081

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

Average Low Income Urban Dist.Median Low Income Urban Dist.Standard Deviation Low Inc. Urb. Dist.Sum Low Inc. Urb. Dist.

14


AVERAGE LOWMEDIAN LOW

INCOMEURBANDISTRICTS INCOMEURBANDISTRICTS

STANDARDSUMLOW




OPERATINGBUDGETAFTERTRANSPANDTUITIONCOST

OPERATINGBUDGETAFTERTRANSPANDTUITIONCOST/ENR

OPERATINGBUDGETAFTERTRANSPANDTUITIONCOST:ABOVEORBELOWADEQUACY

%ABOVEORBELOWADEQUACY

2015-16TotalBudgetaryComparativePerPupilCost

2015-16TotalClassroomInstructionPerPupil

2014-15TotalClassroomInstructionCostPerPupil

2014-15Rankof103K-123500+DistrictsfromlowesttohighestClassroomInstruction(UNLESSDIFFERENTDISTRICTGROUPINGISINDICATED)

2013-14AVERAGETEACHERSALARY

2013-14TEACHERS'AVERAGEYEARSOFEXPERIENCE

2014-15MEDIANTEACHERS'SALARY

MEDIANSALARYRANKFROMLOWESTTOHIGHESTOF103K-123500+DISTRICTS

2014-15RATIOOFSTUDENTSTOTEACHERS

STUDENTTOTEACHERRATIORANKFROMHIGHESTTOLOWESTOF103K-123500+DISTRICTS

$85,021,254 $15,790 -$19,627,283 -18.8% $15,961 $9,343 $9,401 71 $61,244 12.2 $59,175 17 11.2 83$271,705,666 $17,800 -$21,609,589 -7.4% $19,655 $11,633 $11,444 100 $65,889 13.5 $61,203 28 11.7 67$246,767,009 $18,046 -$32,133,721 -11.5% $17,187 $9,974 $10,483 93 $79,212 12.0 $67,693 62 13.0 29$416,588,321 $15,254 -$109,465,097 -20.8% $15,629 $8,602 $9,087 61 $64,156 11.6 $53,672 4 11.3 79$151,774,078 $16,797 -$34,986,759 -18.7% $16,747 $9,627 $10,116 91 $70,089 11.1 $62,178 36 12.1 53$74,764,022 $12,419 -$44,570,730 -37.3% $12,348 $6,600 $6,680 1 $54,639 8.3 $51,436 1 13.1 23

$764,371,509 $15,384 -$198,052,110 -20.6% $15,961 $8,195 $8,280 26 $72,726 13.4 $62,003 35 12.9 30$215,788,099 $15,417 -$60,473,494 -21.9% $17,154 $10,135 $10,941 97 $70,946 7.2 $69,250 67 11.1 84$19,186,933 $20,207 $1,574,674 8.9% $18,568 $10,407 $10,060 43/50 $61,327 10.1 $57,179 16/50 9.3 47/50$209,095,312 $17,890 -$41,211,120 -16.5% $17,407 $8,580 $8,639 46 $71,706 12.3$68,945,248 $19,226 $973,298 1.4% $20,904 $12,022 $10,803 95 $62,654 12.2 $56,001 10 10.5 94$189,508,529 $18,839 -$6,390,127 -3.3% $20,291 $11,720 $9,824 87 $80,267 13.6 $78,173 90 10.7 93$386,592,482 $16,175 -$105,497,572 -21.4% $15,978 $9,770 $10,338 92 $78,443 5.0 $77,781 89 12.2 49$79,997,997 $15,522 -$23,987,946 -23.1% $15,871 $8,837 $8,838 56 $60,532 9.4 $55,341 9 11.1 84$276,655,879 $27,785 $83,509,327 43.2% $16,821 $10,504 $9,985 90 $68,973 10.8 $60,500 23 12.4 44$59,478,819 $25,033 $14,687,947 32.8% $28,893 $15,290 $14,673 68/68 $73,012 16.2 $67,560 47/68 8.3 65/68$113,041,045 $15,455 -$29,169,595 -20.5% $16,270 $9,369 9,634 77 $68,611 13.0 $68,976 65 13.1 23$29,988,389 $22,067 $5,615,119 23.0% $23,688 $13,135 $11,791 49/50 $63,908 11.0 $57,035 15/50 7.6 48/50$62,338,720 $24,935 $18,026,688 40.7% $17,393 $10,535 $9,742 84 $69,401 14.3 $76,878 86 11.6 74$34,196,100 $16,920 -$6,294,865 -15.5% $15,840 $8,804 $9,126 55/68 $77,065 14.6 $69,386 56/68 12.6 22/68$37,360,865 $20,641 $4,602,604 14.1% $18,761 $10,846 $10,882 65/68 $64,128 12.7 $62,135 27/68 10.1 63/68$82,514,173 $16,648 -$2,244,721 -2.6% $15,285 $8,543 $8,400 33 $63,208 13.1 $60,132 21 11.7 67$145,429,340 $16,193 -$42,438,159 -22.6% $16,242 $8,794 $9,194 66 $67,888 12.5 $61,597 30 12.5 39$79,748,636 $16,259 -$11,333,713 -12.4% $15,121 $9,127 $9,656 80 $71,078 9.4 $54,706 7 11.3 79$103,929,359 $14,231 -$45,900,120 -30.6% $14,263 $8,411 $8,915 57 $77,523 13.7$153,885,936 $15,618 -$19,967,498 -11.5% $16,089 $9,964 $9,780 85 $65,302 13.0 $61,320 29 12.1 53$30,061,245 $21,975 $6,449,460 27.3% $18,646 $10,320 $9,878 40/50 $66,365 10.8 $60,283 24 10.0 45$95,536,421 $21,659 $23,443,337 32.5% $19,240 $11,413 $11,363 99 $77,562 16.3 $82,785 95 11.1 84$77,769,495 $15,865 -$17,913,336 -18.7% $14,828 $8,850 $9,192 65 $63,071 10.1 $60,266 22 11.6 74$533,591,384 $17,139 -$67,699,461 -11.3% $17,500 $10,384 $10,642 94 $78,123 12.6 $64,658 49 11.8 63$68,582,505 $17,994 $1,168,454 1.7% $16,144 $8,925 $8,564 42 $61,250 11.7 $54,817 8 11.8 63$50,351,059 $20,385 $6,950,090 16.0% $23,250 $11,296 $10,863 64/68 $75,039 10.3 $72,274 62/68 9.9 64/68

$165,800,058 18,359.6 -$23,528,880 -2.8% $17,793 $10,108 10,017.2 74.5 69,377.4 11.9 63,964.0 39.4 11.3 63.2$95,536,421 17,138.5 -$17,913,336 -11.5% $16,821 $9,964 9,824.0 82.0 68,973.0 12.2 61,597.0 29.0 11.6 67.0$166,816,158 $3,330 $49,227,954 21.3% $3,066 $1,559 $1,271 $6,213 $7,808 $30 $21

$5,214,565,829 $17,317 -$773,966,018 -13.2%

2014-15 $15,067 8,933 $68,302 11.82014-15 $14,453 8,771

$74,764,022 $12,419 -$44,570,730 -37.3% $12,348 $6,600 $6,680 1 $54,639 8.3 $51,436 1 13.1 23$126,043,144 $13,747 -$9,069,459 -6.7% $13,355 $8,438 $8,308 28 $64,553 11.9 $63,531 41 11.7 67$100,489,532 $16,514 $17,036,588 20.4% $16,005 $9,592 $9,058 23/41 $71,697 11.9 $63,050 46/82 11.1 56/82$121,299,437 $13,810 -$100,509 -0.1% $13,762 $7,989 $7,801 15 $62,935 13.4 $57,850 14 13.3 12$201,872,214 $12,761 -$23,551,906 -10.4% $12,457 $7,631 $7,455 7 $60,435 12.7 $60,947 26 13.5 8

30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43


15






ClassroomSuppliesTextbooks

ClassroomSuppliesTextbooksRankLowesttoHighestof103K-123500+Districts

LEGALSERVICEPERPUPIL

RANKOF103K-123500+PUPILDISTRICTS

EQUALIZATIONAID

SPECIALEDUCATIONCATEGORICALAID SECURITYAID ADJUSTMENTAID

UNDERADEQUACYAID

TRANSPORT-ATIONAID OTHERSTATEAID TOTALSTATEAID

PUBLICSTUDENTSMANDATEDREMOTETRANSPORTATION

$810 103 $15 4 $70,303,534 $2,692,474 $2,030,338 $0 $311,832 $605,810 $4,008,458 $79,952,446 448$776 102 $23 19 $214,776,464 $8,244,198 $5,949,022 $46,068,696 $0 $4,511,837 $297,380 $279,847,597 2,213$479 97 $13 2 $192,253,769 $7,822,139 $5,836,727 $0 $177,430 $1,952,300 $20,272,339 $228,314,704 572$274 49 $58 88 $369,020,610 $15,680,979 $11,460,079 $0 $0 $3,126,191 $546,160 $399,834,019 2,630$291 56 $29 35 $113,001,439 $5,027,788 $3,457,005 $0 $26,657 $1,087,379 $177,000 $122,777,268 1,362$128 3 $131 103 $15,263,034 $2,975,869 $2,161,835 $0 $0 $3,934,658 $116,740 $24,452,136 2,038

$350 67 $77 97 $645,243,822 $28,180,824 $19,309,359 $13,306,175 $0 $6,754,710 $2,476,629 $715,271,519 5,572$456 90 $23 19 $190,547,980 $8,270,931 $5,077,389 $21,179,870 $0 $2,732,863 $272,000 $228,081,033 2,096$221 13/50 $36 29/50 $13,079,730 $538,956 $404,168 $2,171,621 $0 $159,661 $30,504 $16,384,640 83$404 82 $45 79 $164,712,713 $6,724,737 $5,226,396 $0 $447,622 $475,331 $231,880 $177,818,679 19$443 89 $64 91 $46,591,510 $2,156,890 $1,332,096 $14,090,235 $0 $593,318 $73,550 $64,837,599 619$486 98 $62 89 $134,123,318 $6,372,145 $3,859,812 $32,420,739 $0 $1,183,036 $197,360 $178,156,410 396$383 77 $73 94 $308,295,204 $13,260,027 $9,919,445 $0 $500,000 $2,976,954 $28,994,328 $363,945,958 2,067$370 74 $24 22 $60,692,109 $2,860,412 $1,838,577 $0 $265,589 $545,602 $7,252,531 $73,454,820 27$332 63 $19 12 $136,227,020 $5,893,084 $4,257,756 $0 $0 $1,724,246 $11,888,817 $159,990,923 218$944 68/68 $63 66/68 $28,163,553 $1,392,679 $1,000,414 $24,422,872 $0 $380,652 $46,840 $55,407,010 140$168 12 $66 92 $81,433,567 $4,330,651 $2,502,539 $22,788,835 $0 $1,175,305 $142,220 $112,373,117 87$512 45/50 $39 34/50 $16,973,265 $901,656 $535,157 $8,642,285 $0 $244,350 $37,946 $27,334,659 25$275 50 $77 97 $25,057,290 $1,371,130 $769,147 $9,997,105 $0 $188,706 $58,034 $37,441,412 101$498 61/68 $46 55/68 $23,080,693 $1,254,537 $822,910 $0 $40,247 $145,453 $39,940 $25,383,780 0$325 46/68 $34 31/68 $18,865,262 $995,008 $585,469 $9,360,582 $0 $232,091 $36,080 $30,074,492 30$245 41 $11 1 $49,446,977 $2,687,332 $1,554,350 $12,565,599 $0 $1,606,355 $99,200 $67,959,813 1,586$324 63 $75 96 $100,550,671 $4,804,436 $3,169,418 $0 $423,687 $1,265,855 $11,183,613 $121,397,680 812$160 10 $33 47 $50,705,135 $2,849,228 $1,540,806 $0 $0 $715,197 $98,260 $55,908,626 239$191 20 $19 12 $85,160,953 $4,162,377 $2,840,803 $0 $500,000 $502,011 $146,840 $93,312,984 0$395 78 $16 7 $89,507,454 $5,190,051 $3,028,970 $34,392,237 $0 $4,314,688 $253,210 $136,686,610 4,517$311 27/50 $37 30/50 $13,867,857 $858,702 $443,577 $1,394,126 $0 $205,655 $27,740 $16,797,657 102$251 41 $27 28 $44,411,804 $2,619,559 $1,269,289 $32,419,492 $0 $2,475,702 $285,379 $83,481,225 2,877$252 42 $17 9 $36,768,086 $2,795,051 $1,823,590 $0 $76,031 $627,703 $97,560 $42,188,021 877$339 65 $41 70 $270,661,365 $18,332,551 $11,334,316 $114,452,158 $0 $2,953,347 $737,553 $418,471,290 2,072$182 18 $22 17 $25,407,093 $2,404,326 $1,222,886 $2,234,768 $0 $1,363,716 $77,300 $32,710,089 48$455 48/68 $107 68/68 $0 $1,463,760 $725,704 $5,392,689 $0 $124,289 $2,950,118 $10,656,560 3

$384 62 $42 47.0 $116,739,685 $5,552,859 $3,713,791 $13,138,712 $89,326 $1,514,526 $3,001,186 $143,750,085 1,027$339 64 $36 31.5 $70,303,534 $2,860,412 $2,030,338 $2,234,768 $0 $1,087,379 $197,360 $83,481,225 396$184 29 $24 $38 $135,270,308 $6,032,800 $4,198,634 $22,771,357 $167,321 $1,570,945 $6,642,558 $154,995,194 1,400

$3,634,193,281 $175,114,487 $117,289,349 $407,300,084 $2,769,095 $50,884,971 $93,153,509 $4,480,704,776 33,876

6,070,003,740 763,303,976 195,490,797 555,769,732 16,763,431 177,878,057 $736,571,346 $7,960,011,347 354,795

$321 $39 $10,184,570 $1,280,711 328,005 932,500 28,127 $298,453 $1,235,858 $13,355,724 671$324 $36 $1,073,503 $629,555 58,333 0 0 $84,365 $80,830 $2,762,081 233

$40,117,662 $2,124,119 1,258,162 5,960,129 94,898 $646,259 $6,200,024 $47,275,166 1,031

$128 3 $131 103 $15,263,034 $2,975,869 $2,161,835 $0 $0 $3,934,658 $116,740 $24,452,136 2,038$166 11 $41 70 $9,463,269 $5,393,423 $1,039,800 $14,934,026 $0 $4,922,064 $186,246 $35,938,828 3,476$195 7of82 $24 22/82 $27,465,312 $3,740,074 $517,479 $0 $0 $619,299 $757,956 $33,100,120 2,785$259 43 $32 46 $42,102,240 $5,211,500 $854,977 $0 $0 $1,013,961 $368,458 $49,551,136 5,200$222 32 $15 4 $39,889,745 $9,141,043 $1,820,980 $11,839,961 $433,801 $4,586,531 $311,660 $68,023,721 5,133

44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56


16






PUBLICSPECIALEDW/OSPECIALNEEDSMANDATEDREMOTETRANSPORTATION

SPECIALEDWITHSPECIALNEEDS

NON-PUBLICMANDATEDREMOTETRANSPORTATION

TOTALMANDATEDREMOTETRANSPORTATION AIDINLEIU

TOTALMANDATEDREMOTETRANSPORTATION TRANSPAID

TRANSPAID/TOTALMANDATEDREMOTETRANSPORTATION

PUPILSSENTPRIVSCHFORHANDICAPPED

EXTRAORD-INARYAID

ENR/PUPILSSENTTOPRIVSCHFORHANDI-CAPPED

SPEECH,OT,PTANDREL-ATEDSERVS

SPEECH,OT,PTANDREL-ATEDSERVS/ENR

OTHERSUPPSERVSTD-EXTRASERV

CHILDSTUDYTEAMS

79 127 0 654 46 654 $605,810 $926 28 $0 192.3 $803,662 $149 $41,410 $1,492,179773 684 242 3,912 161 3,912 $4,511,837 $1,153 170 $0 89.8 $850,000 $56 $600,000 $3,173,073137 611 0 1,320 . 1,320 $1,952,300 $1,479 228 $2,000,000 60.0 $8,852,852 $647 $4,883,578 $5,588,562173 1,543 275 4,621 394 4,621 $3,126,191 $677 254 $2,362,008 107.5 $3,436,711 $126 $7,413,402 $9,841,622

218 104 1,684 74 1,684 $1,087,379 $646 69 $368,956 131.9 $0 $4,109,400278 392 15,982 18,690 286 18,690 $3,934,658 $211 260 $4,500,000 23.2 $3,437,855 $571 $3,158,951 $2,692,498

3,283 533 2,507 11,895 762 11,895 $6,754,710 $568 309 $2,027,468 160.8 $4,617,071 $93 $4,630,572 $17,002,4254 1,631 342 4,073 142 4,073 $2,732,863 $671 182 $939,943 77.1 $1,988,922 $142 $1,500,000 $4,992,9205 61 0 149 . 149 $159,661 $1,072 7 $100,000 135.6 $302,817 $319 $315,011 $532,890

207 104 0 330 . 330 $475,331 $1,440 83 $500,000 140.8 $0 $5,964,66947 188 28 882 41 882 $593,318 $673 15 $0 239.1 $391,338 $109 $578,038 $1,460,950

280 208 0 884 . 884 $1,183,036 $1,338 138 $685,000 72.9 $766,742 $76 $763,800 $5,108,4591,399 443 184 4,093 168 4,093 $2,976,954 $727 182 $2,920,297 131.3 $4,453,810 $186 $14,225,970 $6,548,079297 146 0 470 . 470 $545,602 $1,161 65 $432,340 79.3 $20,000 $4 $2,883,07936 650 0 903 . 903 $1,724,246 $1,909 62 $21,762,553 160.6 $0 $0 $2,700,00048 233 2 423 . 423 $380,652 $900 47 $0 50.6 $808,675 $340 $321,457 $1,746,864

446 16 549 . 549 $1,175,305 $2,141 191 $1,000,000 38.3 268,570 $37 $0 2,444,48722 77 0 124 . 124 $244,350 $1,971 31 $0 43.8 586,642 $432 $247,499 $1,257,702

283 19 21 424 9 424 $188,706 $445 12 $200,000 208.3 $495,928 $198 $537,035 $1,761,3310 70 0 70 . 70 $145,453 $2,078 40 $0 50.5 $112,362 $56 $947,83241 53 0 124 . 124 $232,091 $1,872 27 $0 67.0 $3,000 $2 $1,236,875

384 224 83 2,277 93 2,277 $1,606,355 $705 22 $185,870 225.3 $214,311 $43 $736,297 $2,862,778440 203 292 1,747 169 1,747 $1,265,855 $725 68 $1,000,000 132.1 $436,111 $49 $0 $3,520,265115 128 23 505 505 $715,197 $1,416 24 $1,072,000 204.4 $789,172 $161 $721,219 $2,071,890127 230 0 357 357 $502,011 $1,406 52 $280,000 140.4 $1,682,647 $230 $1,490,179 $2,866,990916 491 521 6,445 137 6,445 $4,314,688 $669 60 $700,000 164.2 $1,511,200 $153 $136,321 $2,461,59532 42 0 176 176 $205,655 $1,168 16 $45,000 85.5 $451,962 $330 $125,720 $1,099,429

586 170 0 3,633 72 3,633 $2,475,702 $681 44 $112,368 100.3 $914,904 $207 $1,368,337 $3,225,630145 97 271 1,390 115 1,390 $627,703 $452 38 $200,000 129.0 $244,407 $50 $532,991 $3,017,691779 509 1 3,361 798 3,361 $2,953,347 $879 128 $1,785,679 243.2 $4,696,988 $151 $1,812,227 $14,573,351145 24 0 217 217 $1,363,716 $6,284 85 $200,000 44.8 $871,406 $229 $1,118,09774 26 0 103 103 $124,289 $1,207 24 $135,355 102.9 $905,395 $367 $989,162 $1,433,893

374 329 158 1,864 212 1,864 $1,514,526 $1,272 87.1 $1,323,059 122.9 1,430,262.2 $159 1,832,092.7 3,840,161.5145 203 1 882 137 882 $1,087,379 $1,072 60.0 $280,000 129.0 789,172.0 $142 660,609.5 2,862,778.0650 391 456 2,509 247 2,509 $1,570,945 $1,054 $80 $3,875,526 $61 $1,984,006 $150 $3,202,503 $3,778,935

11,134 10,581 20,894 76,485 3,467 76,485 $50,884,971 $665 2,960 $45,514,837 3,833 $44,915,460 $149 $47,129,176 $121,737,505

58,847 44,821 54,134 512,597 31,430 $177,878,057 $347

136 82 142 1,031 73 $298,45340 38 39 350 37 $84,365

261 142 840 2,274 102 $646,259

278 392 15,982 18,690 286 18,690 $3,934,658 $211 260 $4,500,000 23.2 $3,437,855 $571 $3,158,951 $2,692,4981,368 501 718 6,063 43 6,063 $4,922,064 $812 89 $900,000 103.0 $2,825,552 $308 $3,416,227 $3,220,414485 464 88 3,822 109 3,822 $619,299 $162 15 $500,000 405.7 $1,960,550 $322 $523,110 $3,172,101904 555 302 6,960 160 6,960 $1,013,961 $146 53 $900,000 167.3 $1,375,240 $157 $3,225,338 $3,330,420865 569 561 7,127 142 7,127 $4,586,531 $644 69 $561,500 230.9 $3,312,595 $209 $9,500 $3,340,424

57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71


17






CHILDSTUDYTEAM/ENR

TOTALSPEECH,OT,PTANDRELATEDSERVICE;OTHERSUPPSERVSTD-EXTRASERV;CHILDSTUDYTEAM

TOTALSPEECH,ANDRELATEDSERVICE;OTHERSUPPSERVSTD-EXTRASERV;CHILDSTUDYTEAM/ENR

TRANSPORTATION;TUITION;SPEECH,OT,PTANDRELATEDSERVS;OTHERSUPPSERVSTD-EXTRASERV;CHILDSTUDYTEAMCOSTS

TRANSPORTATION;TUITION;SPEECH,OT,PTANDRELATEDSERVS;OTHERSUPPSERVSTD-EXTRASERV;CHILDSTUDYTEAMCOSTS/OPERATINGBUDGET

TRANSPORTATION;TUITION;SPEECH,OT,PTANDRELATEDSERV;OTHERSUPPSERVSTD-EXTRASERV;CHILDSTUDYTEAMCOSTS/ENR

ADJUSTEDOPERATINGBUDGET(OPERATINGBUDGETMINUSTRANSPORTATION;TUITION;SPEECH,OT,PTANDRELATEDSERV;OTHERSUPPSERVSTD-EXTRASERV;CHILDSTUDYTEAMCOSTS)

ADJUSTEDOPERATINGBUDGET/ENR

ADJUSTEDOPERATINGBUDGETABOVEORBELOWADEQUACY

ADJUSTEDOPERATINGBUDGET%ABOVEORBELOWADEQUACY

FY2015LOCALFAIRSHARE

2014-15LOCALTAXLEVY

LOCALTAXLEVY/LOCALFAIRSHARE

2015-16TAXCHANGE

$277 $2,337,251 $434 $11,084,873 11.8% $2,059 $82,684,003 $15,356 -$21,964,534 -21.0% $9,596,275 $3,637,144 37.9% $0$208 $4,623,073 $303 $33,401,404 11.1% $2,188 $267,082,593 $17,497 -$26,232,662 -8.9% $27,460,109 $7,449,009 27.1% $0$409 $19,324,992 $1,413 $55,658,153 19.7% $4,070 $227,442,017 $16,633 -$51,458,713 -18.5% $46,313,048 $16,818,577 36.3% $0$360 $20,691,735 $758 $81,585,132 17.1% $2,987 $395,896,586 $14,496 -$130,156,832 -24.7% $96,356,637 $38,955,956 40.4% $0$455 $4,109,400 $455 $20,817,890 12.4% $2,304 $147,664,678 $16,342 -$39,096,159 -20.9% $37,345,374 $27,326,591 73.2% $536,209$447 $9,289,304 $1,543 $55,355,705 45.8% $9,195 $65,474,718 $10,876 -$53,860,034 -45.1% $85,419,632 $84,693,837 99.2% $5,656,331

$342 $26,250,068 $528 $107,616,373 12.7% $2,166 $738,121,441 $14,855 -$224,302,178 -23.3% $179,577,518 $113,382,515 63.1% $2,267,650$357 $8,481,842 $606 $50,595,514 19.6% $3,615 $207,306,257 $14,811 -$68,955,336 -25.0% $40,586,655 $21,115,662 52.0% $0$561 $1,150,718 $1,212 $3,482,168 16.2% $3,667 $18,036,215 $18,995 $423,956 2.4% $3,118,432 $2,392,321 76.7% $0$510 $5,964,669 $510 $19,200,331 8.6% $1,643 $203,130,643 $17,379 -$47,175,789 -18.8% $44,823,222 $15,418,637 34.4% $0$407 $2,430,326 $678 $9,896,032 13.0% $2,760 $66,514,922 $18,549 -$1,457,028 -2.1% $13,452,876 $8,148,542 60.6% $162,970$508 $6,639,001 $660 $24,763,548 11.9% $2,462 $182,869,528 $18,179 -$13,029,128 -6.7% $44,763,085 $18,950,050 42.3% $0$274 $25,227,859 $1,056 $75,873,465 17.4% $3,174 $361,364,623 $15,119 -$130,725,431 -26.6% $91,673,797 $52,313,124 57.1% $7,500,000$559 $2,903,079 $563 $12,105,577 13.6% $2,349 $77,094,918 $14,958 -$26,891,025 -25.9% $20,800,481 $10,874,799 52.3% $817,496$271 $2,700,000 $271 $25,235,855 8.4% $2,534 $273,955,879 $27,514 $80,809,327 41.8% $41,863,440 $21,762,553 52.0% $0$735 $2,876,996 $1,211 $9,676,765 14.6% $4,073 $56,601,823 $23,822 $11,810,951 26.4% $14,196,885 $6,505,623 45.8% $130,113$334 $2,713,057 $371 $27,201,553 19.8% $3,719 $110,327,988 $15,084 -$31,882,652 -22.4% $38,559,808 $17,459,529 45.3% $0$925 $2,091,843 $1,539 $6,503,752 18.9% $4,786 $27,896,546 $20,527 $3,523,276 14.5% $8,105,967 $4,772,838 58.9% $95,456$705 $2,794,294 $1,118 $6,702,169 10.1% $2,681 $59,544,426 $23,818 $15,232,394 34.4% $12,323,996 $10,013,119 81.2% $715,592$469 $1,060,194 $525 $5,768,032 14.8% $2,854 $33,135,906 $16,396 -$7,355,059 -18.2% $14,894,717 $9,229,913 62.0% $0$683 $1,239,875 $685 $4,753,682 11.6% $2,626 $36,120,990 $19,956 $3,362,729 10.3% $8,890,263 $3,484,198 39.2% $725,802$578 $3,813,386 $769 $11,482,942 12.7% $2,317 $78,700,787 $15,878 -$6,058,107 -7.1% $26,559,924 $11,097,656 41.8% $221,953$392 $3,956,376 $441 $19,303,460 12.0% $2,149 $141,472,964 $15,752 -$46,394,535 -24.7% $40,592,822 $22,731,000 56.0% $0$422 $3,582,281 $730 $11,575,617 13.2% $2,360 $76,166,355 $15,528 -$14,915,994 -16.4% $29,307,459 $25,232,470 86.1% $756,975$393 $6,039,816 $827 $14,019,686 12.5% $1,920 $97,889,543 $13,404 -$51,939,936 -34.7% $39,126,167 $14,860,598 38.0% $0$250 $4,109,116 $417 $20,734,387 12.2% $2,104 $149,776,820 $15,201 -$24,076,614 -13.8% $61,567,430 $21,731,439 35.3% $434,629$804 $1,677,111 $1,226 $5,067,506 15.1% $3,704 $28,384,134 $20,749 $4,772,349 20.2% $9,361,252 $10,488,485 112.0% $411,393$731 $5,508,871 $1,249 $13,578,773 13.1% $3,078 $90,027,550 $20,410 $17,934,466 24.9% $22,896,538 $11,778,974 51.4% $1,163,972$616 $3,795,089 $774 $9,212,234 11.1% $1,879 $73,974,406 $15,091 -$21,708,425 -22.7% $48,735,599 $36,131,331 74.1% $1,769,721$468 $21,082,566 $677 $54,516,294 9.6% $1,751 $512,508,818 $16,461 -$88,782,027 -14.8% $311,145,670 $109,961,901 35.3% $2,199,238$293 $1,989,503 $522 $11,657,111 14.9% $3,058 $66,593,002 $17,472 -$821,049 -1.2% $43,678,116 $35,329,068 80.9% $706,581$581 $3,328,450 $1,348 $6,443,807 12.1% $2,609 $47,022,609 $19,037 $3,621,640 8.3% $168,536,229 $39,426,390 23.4% $1,578,276

$480 6,596,543.1 $770 $24,823,035 13.6% $2,763 $159,203,515 $17,589 -$30,125,423 -6.9% $51,490,638 $24,154,194 53.9% 715,936.3$455 3,795,089.0 $678 $13,578,773 12.7% $2,609 $90,027,550 $16,461 -$21,708,425 -14.8% $38,559,808 $16,818,577 52.0% 162,970.0$179 $7,371,983 $356 $25,679,738 3.1% $774 $160,351,017 $3,204 $55,325,432 20.2% $63,513,781 $26,340,247 19.8% $1,424,126$404 $213,782,141 $710 $778,803,389 13.7% $2,586 $4,926,019,666 $16,359 -$943,177,429 -16.1% $1,681,629,423 $833,473,849 49.6% -$62,499,811

$16,621,147,265 $13,810,752,454 83.1%

$28,028,916 $23,408,055 90.2%$16,435,701 $12,844,716 91.6%$34,182,768 $28,596,500 68.9%

$0$447 $9,289,304 $1,543 $55,355,705 45.8% $9,195 $65,474,718 $10,876 -$53,860,034 -45.1% $85,419,632 $84,693,837 99.2% $5,656,331

$351.25 $9,462,193 $1,032 $23,891,231 17.0% $2,606 $116,580,951 $12,715 -$18,531,652 -13.7% $132,275,583 $97,622,590 73.8% $0$521.30 $5,655,761 $929 $13,738,357 12.7% $2,258 $94,833,771 $15,585 $11,380,827 13.6% $60,410,689 $67,540,789 111.8% $1,323,808$379.17 $7,930,998 $903 $20,800,503 15.5% $2,368 $113,368,439 $12,907 -$8,031,507 -6.6% $90,695,988 $76,178,357 84.0% $1,523,567$211.16 $6,662,519 $421 $23,763,182 10.9% $1,502 $195,209,695 $12,340 -$30,214,425 -13.4% $192,846,973 $132,197,482 68.6% $5,371,544

72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85


18






%TAXCHANGE

UNEMPLOY-MENT

2014LABORFORCE

2010CENSUS

MEDIANHOUSEHOLDINCOME

MEDIANFAMILYINCOME

PERCENTOFPOPULATION17ANDUNDER MEDIANAGE

AVERAGEFAMILYSIZE

2010POPULATIONDENSITY

2014MUNICIPALTAXLEVY

2014COUNTYTAXLEVY

TOTALCOUNTY,MUNICIPALANDSCHOOLLEVY INCOME

0.0% 11.4% 8,357 25,349 $31,044 $38,750 27.9% 29.7 3.85 4,102 $12,031,906 $5,221,621 $20,890,671 $233,997,6580.0% 12.7% 27,003 77,344 $27,027 $29,118 31.0% 28.5 3.56 8,670 $24,665,230 $14,212,894 $46,327,133 $616,653,6910.0% 9.4% 30,221 69,781 $31,135 $34,934 31.5% 29.2 4.02 22,181 $59,219,316 $22,823,025 $98,860,918 $936,517,9300.0% 11.9% 62,767 146,199 $34,086 $39,003 27.9% 32.1 3.71 17,347 $153,854,281 $43,951,180 $236,761,417 $1,832,397,7282.0% 6.2% 26,382 55,181 $44,543 $44,555 21.1% 23.3 3.91 10,557 $28,822,867 $12,549,178 $69,234,845 $602,882,9776.7% 6.3% 28,809 92,843 $41,527 $45,420 41.8% 23.9 4.49 $53,095,472 $28,709,453 $172,155,093 $1,518,509,794

53,805 $36,516 $38,493 48.4% 19.1 5.23 7,6022.0% 10.2% 118,917 277,140 $35,659 $41,684 25.6% 32.3 3.36 11,458 $201,233,897 $67,813,075 $384,697,137 $3,143,709,5670.0% 9.1% 38,548 84,913 $36,601 $41,491 25.1% 32.6 3.40 11,103 $75,447,307 $14,707,989 $111,270,958 $908,555,1740.0% 15.3% 1,849 5,146 $25,682 $38,286 28.2% 34.4 3.05 $4,280,499 $2,118,791 $8,791,611 $58,276,2530.0% 8.0% 35,043 66,455 $40,173 $43,101 23.7% 33.9 3.39 51,797 $66,838,013 $16,042,048 $98,298,698 $941,656,0472.0% 13.2% 9,519 20,249 $39,560 $48,873 27.5% 33.0 3.53 3,556 $20,761,093 $4,471,096 $33,543,701 $248,233,2610.0% 9.9% 30,454 64,270 $40,358 $50,995 25.7% 35.0 3.33 16,379 $87,793,839 $14,985,117 $121,729,006 $900,407,693

14.3% 8.4% 63,858 124,969 $43,770 $46,891 25.6% 33.2 3.43 10,144 $141,721,616 $33,998,354 $235,533,094 $1,796,641,8007.5% 9.1% 14,274 32,868 $40,818 $44,645 25.0% 34.4 3.38 $39,887,778 $7,256,875 $58,836,948 $416,248,9220.0% 10.6% 24,981 50,814 $47,696 $53,792 27.3% 32.4 3.65 10,807 $56,178,003 $12,629,164 $90,569,720 $746,662,0132.0% 9.6% 7,573 16,116 $33,527 $33,140 23.8% 34.0 3.33 11,317 $15,198,698 $3,682,123 $25,516,557 $222,273,7250.0% 10.2% 25,710 53,926 $42,580 $50,798 25.4% 34.0 3.33 $70,008,083 $12,417,864 $99,885,476 $813,537,3772.0% 8.4% 5,248 10,105 $39,206 $52,128 23.4% 36.8 3.24 9,453 $10,334,462 $1,720,050 $16,922,806 $157,763,3277.1% 7.6% 7,246 14,950 $42,825 $51,334 25.8% 37.1 3.12 4,682 $10,932,866 $5,638,412 $27,299,989 $247,116,0060.0% 6.2% 8,050 13,620 $51,193 $53,006 20.8% 34.0 3.23 11,322 $18,592,896 $5,862,194 $33,685,003 $297,325,673

20.8% 9.0% 5,485 11,456 $52,222 $58,825 24.5% 36.7 3.31 4,938 $10,106,000 $4,460,888 $18,776,888 $189,386,1232.0% 9.5% 13,341 28,400 $44,925 $55,000 25.8% 36.6 3.19 676 $18,614,053 $17,742,135 $47,675,797 $547,813,3640.0% 8.5% 27,441 49,808 $52,056 $58,942 25.8% 33.3 3.60 8,270 $53,216,937 $13,611,993 $89,559,930 $844,026,8913.0% 9.0% 16,017 30,487 $51,407 $56,701 23.3% 35.5 3.29 14,525 $23,779,544 $4,955,764 $54,724,753 $548,700,4340.0% 6.7% 28,177 49,708 $44,657 $42,534 21.0% 34.8 2.23 49,363 $33,729,028 $11,818,705 $60,408,331 $927,168,5522.0% 9.7% 28,184 60,724 $54,024 $64,185 24.5% 37.7 3.23 888 $32,175,166 $39,829,154 $94,170,388 $1,268,919,7183.9% 8.7% 5,238 9,920 $48,317 $62,049 23.9% 38.9 3.18 3,239 $7,735,586 $2,399,153 $21,034,617 $182,205,5999.9% 8.8% 12,190 27,912 $63,309 $73,757 24.6% 36.5 3.22 $14,066,917 $5,652,362 $32,662,225 $465,955,7774.9% 6.8% 16,000 30,719 $52,792 $56,778 21.7% 33.8 3.23 5,825 $37,092,828 $12,548,383 $87,542,263 $693,759,3072.0% 6.6% 138,335 247,597 $54,280 $58,533 21.1% 33.3 3.20 16,736 $223,604,355 $102,512,654 $438,278,148 $7,131,468,2882.0% 8.1% 15,159 27,935 $58,630 $74,422 20.6% 42.7 3.13 $26,674,459 $10,121,607 $72,831,715 $725,053,8674.0% 3.3% 35,786 50,005 $101,782 $121,614 12.2% 31.2 2.68 39,220 $57,690,375 $60,912,565 $159,607,606 $3,567,442,637

3.0% 9.1% 28,624.3 59,163.4 $45,351 $52,254 24.6% 33.9 3.33 13,790.5 $52,783,481 $18,989,239 $96,642,850 $1,039,121,2062.0% 9.0% 24,981.0 49,708.0 $43,770 $50,995 25.0% 34.0 3.33 10,681.9 $32,175,166 $12,548,383 $69,234,845 $693,759,3074.7% 2.3% $30,811 $63,318 $13,903 $16,835 3.6% 3.5 0.34 $13,359 $55,806,867 $22,638,195 $101,301,526 $1,384,875,944-7.5% $1,636,287,898 $588,666,413 $2,995,928,349 $32,212,757,379

$113,162 $114,265 23.5% 1,196 $27,114,753,398 $317,747,736,669

$558,431,875$283,730,566$739,813,759

6.7% 6.3% 28,809 92,843 $41,527 $45,420 41.8% 23.9 4.49 $53,095,472 $28,709,453 $172,155,093 $1,518,509,7940.0% 6.9% 39,538 75,072 $65,129 $81,868 20.7% 43.6 3.05 $68,937,798 42,778,067.98 $209,338,456 $2,167,586,5612.0% 6.2% 27,783 51,075 $89,287 $102,015 26.3% 39.6 3.37 26,113,351 19,289,911.38 $114,267,859 $1,184,869,3602.0% 6.7% 29,158 54,856 $86,327 $96,171 24.7% 41.6 3.21 $31,114,857 $26,271,390 $135,088,171 $1,740,028,3514.1% 6.7% 48,055 91,239 $71,934 $83,924 22.3% 43.0 3.10 $72,736,498 53,563,404.29 $263,868,928 $3,262,389,179

88,791 72,434 83,745 21.7% 42.5 3.12 2,280

86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99


19

Appendix2

20

Appendix 2--2014 performance report Urban and Neighboring Districts Data complied from individual school reports found on DOE website.

21

11223344556677889910101111121213131414151516161717181819192020

2121222223232424252526262727282829293030313132323333343435353636373738383939

4040414142424343444445454646474748484949505051515252535354545555

5656

57575858

5959

6060

61616262

63636464

65656666676768686969707071717272737374747575767677777878797980808181828283838484

8585868687878888898990909191

AA BB CC DD EE FF GG HH II JJ KK LL MM NN OO PP

COUNTY_CODE HIGHSCHOOL

AverageCompositeSATScore

AverageMathematicsScoreonSAT

AverageCritcalReadingScoreonSAT

AverageWritingScoreonSAT

PercentofStudentsScoringAbove1550onSAT

DROP0UTRATE

POST-SECONDARYENROLLMENT16MONTHSAFTERGRADUATION

ENROLLEDIN2YRINSTIT.

ENROLLED4YRINSTIT.

PERCENTSTUDENTSTAKINGDANCECLASS

PERCENTSTUDENTSTAKINGDRAMACLASS

PERCENTSTUDENTSTAKINGMUSICCLASS

PERCENTSTUDENTSTAKINGVISUALARTS

PERCENTTAKINGANYARTSCLASS

BRIDGETON BRIDGETONHIGHSCHOOL 1190 413 392 385 5.4 3.0% 44.7% 83.1% 16.9% 13.0 6.8 18.2 30.9 54.9CAMDEN DR.CHARLESE.BRIMMMEDICALARTSHIGHSCHOOL 1144 389 381 374 0 0.5% 84.0% 45.2% 54.8% N/R N/R 17.7 43.1 58.4CAMDEN CAMDENHIGHSCHOOL 1014 352 325 337 0 7.1% 37.7% 84.6% 9.6% N/R 19.8 23.3 55 81.9CAMDEN WOODROWWILSONHIGHSCHOOL 1018 353 336 329 0 7.5% 47.9% 72.9% 21.4% 8.7 7.9 51.7 69.2 99.1CAMDEN CREATIVEARTSVILLAGEACADEMY 1069 358 361 350 0 0.6% 17.6 18.1 38.5 16.5 90.1CAMDEN METEASTHIGHSCHOOL 1104 365 385 354 0 0.0% N/R N/R N/R N/R N/RPASSAIC PASSAICHIGHSCHOOL#12 1222 427 401 394 8.7 1.0% 59.8% 66.7% 33.3% N/R 2 6.4 16.3 24PATERSON SCHOOLOFINFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY 2.3% 51.6% 62.1% 37.9% N/R 27.1 10.8 1.3 36.1PATERSON SCHOOLOFCULINARYARTSHOSPITALITYANDTOURISM 990 332 319 339 0 3.0% 49.5% 75.0% 25.0% N/R 29.2 11.3 N/R 40.3PATERSON SCHOOLOFGOVERNMENT&PUBLICADMINISTRATION 1031 358 343 330 4.8 1.4% 59.2% 66.2% 33.8% N/R 21.9 2.7 1.7 25.9PATERSON SCHOOLOFHEALTHSCIENCE 0.0% 84.6% 40.0% 60.0% N/R N/R N/R 36.2 36.2PATERSON SCHOOLOFEARTHANDSPACESCIENCE 0.9% 72.9% 32.6% 67.4% N/R N/R 41.6 43.5 65.9PATERSON ROSAL.PARKSSCHOOLOFFINEANDPERFORMINGARTS 1149 388 375 386 0 0.0% 79.7% 51.0% 49.0% 5.4 33 38.3 26.8 88.5PATERSON ACADEMYHIGHSCHOOL 1080 330 410 340 0 1.0% 34.4% 63.6% 36.4% N/R N/R N/R 51.9 51.9PATERSON INTERNATIONALHIGHSCHOOL 1192 423 387 382 4 0.4% 72.3% 49.4% 50.6% N/R N/R N/R 25.3 25.3PATERSON SCHOOLOFSCIENCETECHNOLOGYENGG&MATHEMATICS 1140 410 369 361 2.2 3.2% 64.1% 53.0% 47.0% N/R 1.4 22.2 12.8 34.6PATERSON SCHOOLOFEDUCATIONANDTRAINING 1070 363 363 344 1.3 3.3% 57.5% 72.1% 27.9% N/R 5.5 6 17 25.7PATERSON SCHOOLOFBUISINESSTECHNOLOGY 980 348 318 314 0 4.4% 47.6% 84.6% 15.4% N/R 0.4 2.5 25.2 28PATERSON SCHOOLOFARCHITECTUREANDCONSTRUCTIONTRADES 985 345 323 317 0 2.9% 41.2% 74.3% 25.7% N/R 2.2 3.3 29.8 34.8NEWBRUNSWICK NEWBRUNSWICKHIGHSCHOOL 1295 453 416 426 19.6 2.4% 63.7% 64.9% 35.1% 4.1 15.3 17.8 54 69.2NEWARK ARTSHIGHSCHOOL 1243 417 410 416 8.1 0.3% 81.3% 35.4% 64.6% 11.9 18.3 44.1 30.9 96.4NEWARK BARRINGERHIGHSCHOOL 1010 350 329 331 0.8 10.2% 46.3% 75.0% 25.0% 9.4 0.1 8.6 27 42.6NEWARK CENTRALHIGHSCHOOL 1078 372 351 355 0 1.5% 59.5% 46.7% 53.3% N/R N/R 25.6 43.3 57.5NEWARK EASTSIDEHIGHSCHOOL 1229 431 396 402 2.6 1.7% 48.9% 69.6% 30.4% N/R 9.9 8.1 41.9 55.1NEWARK NEWARKVOCATIONALHIGHSCHOOL 1049 358 336 355 0 1.6% 55.7% 67.6% 32.4% N/R N/R 20.1 36.8 52.4NEWARK MALCOLMXSHABAZZHIGHSCHOOL 977 336 325 316 0 2.7% 41.6% 50.7% 49.3% N/R 15 39 49.7 85NEWARK SCIENCEPARKHIGHSCHOOL 1612 564 519 529 66 0.1% 88.8% 21.7% 78.3% N/R N/R 21.4 33.6 54.2NEWARK TECHNOLOGYHIGHSCHOOL 1320 465 427 428 6 0.3% 76.1% 32.6% 67.4% N/R 4.1 22.1 24.9 50.2NEWARK UNIVERSITYHIGHSCHOOL 1340 466 439 435 10.6 0.7% 85.0% 17.6% 82.4% N/R N/R 39 35 61.6NEWARK WEEQUAHICHIGHSCHOOL 1014 345 330 339 0 6.1% 37.2% 69.0% 31.0% N/R 2.8 30.2 38.6 61.4NEWARK AMERICANHISTORYHIGHSCHOOL 1220 403 409 408 5.8 0.0% 72.1% 20.5% 79.5% N/R N/R 24.3 44.7 64.4NEWARK NEWARKLEADERSHIPACADEMY 1154 380 368 406 0 19.4% N/R N/R N/R 86.4 86.4NEWARK BARDEARLYCOLLEGEHIGHSCHOOL 1281 426 429 426 7.1 0.0% 36.1 N/R N/R 81.3 86.3TRENTON DAYLIGHT/TWILIGHTHIGHSCHOOL 1100 352 384 364 0 32.6% 23.1% 83.3% 16.7% N/R N/R 31.4 20.3 50.5TRENTON TRENTONCENTRALHIGHSCHOOL-MAINCAMPUS 1128 378 375 375 5.6 3.0% 52.3% 66.9% 33.1% 16.1 N/R 9.4 25.5 46.9TRENTON TRENTONCENTRALHIGHSCHOOL-WESTCAMPUS 1227 411 408 408 11.1 3.6% 64.2% 52.3% 47.7% N/R N/R 12.9 33.4 41.8SALEMCITY SALEMHIGHSCHOOL 1267 436 412 419 11.8 3.1% 41.3% 66.7% 33.3% 13.1 N/R 22 39 65.3UNIONCITY UNIONCITYHIGHSCHOOL 1245 436 403 406 10.9 0.8% 77.2% 48.5% 51.3% 4.3 6 12.6 27.3 42.9PLEASANTVILLECITY PLEASANTVILLEHIGHSCHOOL 1076 380 340 356 2.6 1.8% 50.2% 73.3% 26.7% N/R 10 10 27 43.2EASTORANGE EASTORANGESTEMACADEMYHIGHSCHOOL 1259 436 416 407 11.8 0.4% N/R N/R 69.8 38.7 100EASTORANGE EASTORANGECAMPUSHIGHSCHOOL 1066 362 361 343 0.7 9.7% 55.6% 60.1% 39.9% N/R N/R 14.2 19 32EASTORANGE CICELYL.TYSONCOMMUNITYMIDDLE/HIGHSCHOOL 1273 438 420 415 10.8 1.4% 75.0% 23.2% 76.8% 9.7 28.4 38.1 28.9 99.9ELIZABETH ELIZABETHHIGHSCHOOL 1505 529 477 499 41.3 0.4% 92.0% 15.4% 84.6% 18.1 8.5 39.7 42.4 83.2ELIZABETH JOHNE.DWYERTECHNOLOGYACADEMY 973 349 318 306 1.2 9.7% 54.2% 72.8% 27.2% N/R N/R 14.8 38.7 46.7ELIZABETH ADMIRALWILLIAMF.HALSEYJR.LEADERSHIPACADEMY 996 354 319 323 1.2 1.4% 58.6% 66.9% 33.1% 6.2 N/R N/R 37.2 42.2ELIZABETH THOMASJEFFERSONARTSACADEMY 1062 361 347 354 1.7 0.4% 68.5% 57.4% 42.6% 15.3 14 32.5 31.3 80.4ELIZABETH THOMASA.EDISONCAREERANDTECHNICALACADEMY 1044 375 330 339 0.6 9.7% 67.7% 74.6% 25.4% N/R N/R 0.3 36 36.2ELIZABETH ALEXANDERHAMILTONPREPARATORYACADEMY 1241 439 392 410 9 1.4% 81.8% 50.3% 49.7% 17.7 10.3 17.8 21.9 51.9ORANGETWP ORANGEHIGHSCHOOL 1145 400 374 371 3.2 1.0% 62.0% 51.7% 48.3% 13.1 10.3 18.1 53.6 76.5PERTHAMBOY PERTHAMBOYHIGHSCHOOL 1245 445 398 402 10.4 1.0% 73.2% 61.4% 38.6% 5.5 5.8 15.3 32 47.2ASBURYPARK ASBURYPARKHIGHSCHOOL 1021 363 342 316 4.3 8.5% 45.2% 90.9% 9.1% N/R 6.4 12.5 30.6 41.6IRVINGTON IRVINGTONHIGHSCHOOL 1130 379 374 377 5.7 4.9% 54.4% 64.7% 35.3% 20.5 N/R 23.5 36.9 66.8KEANSBURG KEANSBURGHIGHSCHOOL 1337 466 443 428 20.4 2.8% 67.4% 65.5% 34.5% N/R N/R 21 43.6 60PHILLIPSBURG PHILLIPSBURGHIGHSCHOOL 1551 534 514 503 52 0.7% 67.2% 49.1% 50.9% N/R 2.3 11.7 39.3 49.2HARRISONTOWN HARRISONHIGHSCHOOL 1291 441 420 430 11 0.0% 67.8% 41.4% 56.9% N/R N/R 16.9 25.8 41.3GLOUCESTERCITY GLOUCESTERCITYJR.SR.HIGHSCHOOL 1386 471 459 456 27.1 1.5% 57.2% 66.3% 33.7% N/R 4.6 8.2 49.2 55.7MILLVILLE MILLVILLESENIORHIGHSCHOOL 1397 471 468 458 29.1 1.8% 54.9% 76.0% 24.0% N/R N/R 17.5 26.4 42

PLAINFIELDCITY PLAINFIELDHIGHSCHOOL 1129 381 380 368 2.6 3.2% 52.9% 69.2% 30.8% 5.0 2.9 7.9 8.5 23.1

PLAINFIELDCITY BARACKOBAMAACADEMYFORACADEMIC&CIVICDEVELOPMENT 1022 330 352 340 0 27.1% N/R N/R N/R 46.2 46.2

PLAINFIELDCITY PLAINFIELDACADEMYFORTHEARTS&ADVANCEDSTUDIES 1339 426 459 454 20 0% 11.8 10.5 35.7 27.7 84.5GARFIELD GARFIELDHIGHSCHOOL 1296 456 423 417 10.3 70.7% 44.2% 55.8% N/R N/R 17.9 35.7 47.1WESTNEWYORK MEMORIALHIGHSCHOOL 1263 447 414 402 9.2 0.2% 71.5% 58.3% 41.3% 1.9 5.5 10.5 34.7 48.8VINELAND VINELANDSENIORHIGHSCHOOL 1460 502 485 473 34.3 0.1% 59.1% 74.7% 25.3% N/R 7.2 16.2 32.8 49.8BURLINGTONCITY BURLINGTONCITYHIGHSCHOOL 1319 456 441 422 16.4 1.9% 58.7% 59.0% 41.0% N/R N/R 12.6 30.9 41.5LONGBRANCH LONGBRANCHHIGHSCHOOL 1222 423 399 400 15.3 0.8% 69.4% 63.3% 36.7% 10.3 11.4 15.5 24.6 52.7JERSEYCITY INFINITYINSTITUTE 1549 534 506 509 60 0.0% N/R 1.1 19.5 12.1 32.6JERSEYCITY HENRYSNYDERHIGHSCHOOL 1045 354 345 346 0 7.0% 65.5% 47.3% 49.5% 4.3 2.2 3.8 4.8 15.1JERSEYCITY JAMESJFERRISHIGHSCHOOL 1048 368 334 346 3.2 5.1% 78.9% 57.2% 41.6% N/R N/R 5 20.8 23.8JERSEYCITY LINCOLNHIGHSCHOOL 1019 355 333 331 2.6 1.6% 69.4% 56.0% 41.3% N/R N/R 5.2 0.6 5.8JERSEYCITY DRRONALDMCNAIRHIGHSCHOOL 1774 624 577 573 87.3 0.0% 89.0% 3.2% 96.8% N/R N/R 13.4 4.2 17.5JERSEYCITY WILLIAMLDICKINSONHIGHSCHOOL 1201 423 383 395 8.4 3.6% 73.3% 43.2% 55.2% N/R N/R 7.3 11.4 17.8JERSEYCITY LIBERTYHIGHSCHOOL 1195 406 397 392 3.8 0.0% 88.4% 39.5% 57.9% N/R N/R N/R N/R N/RNEPTUNETWP NEPTUNEHIGHSCHOOL 1310 434 436 440 15.4 0.9% 70.1% 64.6% 35.4% N/R 7.4 11.5 54.9 65.6HOBOKEN HOBOKENJUNIORSENIORHIGHSCHOOL 1204 415 398 391 10.8 0.8% 67.4% 35.6% 62.1% 3.6 3.8 9.5 36.2 50.1

ABBOTTAVERAGE 1191 409 392 390 10.4 3.3% 62.7% 56.7% 42.9% 11.3 7.5 19.3 32.7 52.6ABBOTTMEDIAN 1190 406 387 386 4.8 1.5% 63.9% 60.8% 39.3% 10.3 6.0 16.9 32.0 50.0STATEAVERAGE 1514 502 481 480 38.5 1.1% 2.1% 3.9% 17.5% 31.1% 49.3%STATEMEDIAN 1477 509 486 481 38.6 0.4%

LAKEWOOD LAKEWOODHIGHSCHOOL 1101 388 355 358 1.4 3.2% 45.6% 65.2% 34.8% N/R N/R 1.6 1.2 2.7

BRICK BRICKTOWNSHIPHIGHSCHOOL 1460 501 483 476 35.0 0.8% 73.1% 56.2% 43.8% N/R 1.5 8 27 34.6BRICK BRICKTOWNSHIPMEMORIALHIGHSCHOOL 1466 502 480 484 34.5 1.1% 73.0% 55.0% 45.0% N/R 2.1 7.5 40 48.2HOWELLHIGHSCHOOL HOWELLHIGHSCHOOL 1523 526 502 495 43 0.3% 82.5% 48.2% 51.8% 3.2 5 10.9 29.5 46.2JACKSON JACKSONMEMORIALHIGHSCHOOL 1517 527 496 494 44.2 0.2% 75.2% 43.4% 56.6% N/R 1.4 16.8 33.3 47.9JACKSON JACKSONLIBERTYHIGHSCHOOL 1470 518 478 474 38.6 1.2% 71.2% 54.6% 45.4% N/R 2.5 14.8 28.5 43TOMSRIVER TOMSRIVERHIGHSCHOOLEAST 1504 530 486 488 38.6 1.2% 77.8% 57.6% 42.4% N/R 0.5 29.3 29.6 53.6TOMSRIVER TOMSRIVERHIGHSCHOOLNORTH 1532 536 499 497 46.2 1.0% 76.7% 52.2% 47.8% N/R 2.1 30.2 29 56.8TOMSRIVER TOMSRIVERHIGHSCHOOLSOUTH 1478 513 492 473 39.6 1.6% 68.2% 61.0% 39.0% N/R 0.9 28.6 29.5 56.2

22

Appendix3

23

BIRTHSYear Lakewood Paterson JerseyCity Newark1990 1,275 3,396 4,652 6,3981991 1,260 3,385 4,584 6,3831992 1,298 3,247 4,431 5,8851993 1,286 3,295 4,177 5,6221994 1,411 3,226 4,237 5,5491995 1,391 3,012 4,017 5,3011996 1,477 3,003 4,002 5,0861997 1,539 2,977 3,871 5,1021998 1,702 3,008 3,885 4,7481999 1,784 2,925 3,841 4,8062000 1,944 3,010 3,926 4,8472001 2,201 2,954 3,854 4,8902002 2,365 2,843 3,743 4,6062003 2,646 2,952 3,712 4,7802004 2,806 2,778 3,733 4,6552005 3,049 2,732 3,733 4,5802006 3,129 2,827 3,852 4,8952007 3,461 2,841 4,092 4,8322008 3,448 2,797 4,094 4,8112009 3,746 2,744 4,094 4,6482010 3,849 2,614 4,294 4,2022011 3,966 2,663 4,440 4,353

LAKEWOODTRANSPORTATIONANDTUITIONCOSTS

TRANSPORTATION TUITIONOPERATINGBUDGET

RATIOOFTRANS.ANDTUITIONTOOP.BUDGET

2003 $7,387,726 $5,388,3232004 $8,615,512 $5,471,0752005 $9,855,586 $7,806,2152006 $11,631,701 $8,995,160 $80,557,895 25.6%2007 $13,061,860 $10,663,218 $87,912,032 27.0%2008 $14,849,926 $15,271,616 $94,917,251 31.7%2009 $15,356,692 $15,497,723 $96,232,713 32.1%2010 $16,560,794 $14,978,022 $95,192,866 33.1%2011 $16,035,448 $15,798,337 $97,487,122 32.7%2012 $18,284,218 $18,814,571 $104,362,574 35.5%2013 $21,130,243 $19,053,992 $107,701,339 37.3%2014 $18,325,244 $25,275,951 $114,661,752 38.0%2015 $17,972,788 $28,093,613 $120,830,423 38.1%

24

Appendix4

25

2014 NJ HSPA State Summary07/16/2014

District Name County

2004 % PASS HSPA LA

2005 % PASS HSPA LA

2006 % PASS HSPA LA

2007 % PASS HSPA LA

2008 % PASS HSPA LA

2009 % PASS HSPA LA

2010 % PASS HSPA LA

2011 % PASS HSPA LA

2012 % PASS HSPA LA

2013 % PASS HSPA LA

2014 % PASS HSPA LA

2004 % PASS HSPA MATH


ASBURY PARK MONMOUTH 43.8 33.3 40 45.6 25.2 26.5 47.6 46.6 41.1 41.1 63.4 25.8 23.1BRIDGETON CUMBERLAND 64.4 58.9 62.5 66.2 54.3 58.5 65.9 71.8 75.9 75.9 85.2 33.3 37.1CAMDEN CITY CAMDEN 44 44.7 36.6 48 42.1 34.3 41.4 50.6 41.2 41.2 57.1 23.8 30.1EAST ORANGE ESSEX 58.4 54.5 51.1 62.3 49.1 51.4 59.1 67 71.1 71.1 78.3 30.6 36.8ELIZABETH UNION 57.4 58 57.6 61.2 56.1 63.2 68.4 73.8 77.2 77.2 86.8 37.9 46.9IRVINGTON TOWNSHIP ESSEX 51.5 55 57.9 61.6 60.2 52.4 52.1 68.7 59.9 59.9 69 16.7 24.7KEANSBURG BOROUGH MONMOUTH 68.2 69.5 70.3 85.1 79.1 70.1 76.9 77.3 79.8 79.8 85.5 55.8 58.4MILLVILLE CUMBERLAND 70.2 67.8 63.3 77.1 67.5 68.3 77.8 79.5 81.2 81.2 83.6 54.6 60.3NEW BRUNSWICK MIDDLESEX 61.6 60.8 54 64.3 68.3 65.9 65.3 68.7 75.6 75.6 82.4 46.7 63.9NEWARK ESSEX 48.7 52.4 53.5 58.3 51.1 54.7 57.4 67.7 77.8 77.8 79.6 28.3 37.4ORANGE TOWNSHIP, CITY OF ESSEX 53.3 52.2 43.3 53.1 53.2 46 58.9 64 69.2 69.2 73.4 21.6 33.2PASSAIC CITY PASSAIC 60.3 56 61.9 57.7 58.6 60 59.8 64.1 68.5 68.5 78.1 43 46.7PATERSON PASSAIC 54.7 53.8 52.6 56.3 49.3 49.7 51.7 59.5 71.8 71.8 74.6 40.4 47.2PERTH AMBOY MIDDLESEX 65 61.5 65.2 65 59.9 62.8 67.4 74.4 65.5 65.5 72.7 44.6 52.1PLEASANTVILLE ATLANTIC 51 61.5 46.8 53.2 52.6 45.5 49.5 67.5 65.9 65.9 72.5 29.8 31.3SALEM CITY SALEM 70.8 71.2 76.2 72.8 61.4 72.5 70.2 70.1 70.1 75.8 52.0TRENTON MERCER 49.4 51.5 40.8 51.2 43 42.2 52 61.8 67.9 67.9 71.7 21.6 30.5UNION CITY HUDSON 69.4 64.1 68.1 69.1 69.7 70.7 73.8 76 80.5 80.5 87.6 50.1 56.3VINELAND CITY CUMBERLAND 71.5 69.2 67.3 67.5 60.8 63.3 68.6 76.7 83.1 83.1 84.7 52.7 57.7WEST NEW YORK HUDSON 69.8 67.6 77.2 80.2 71.6 70.4 79.1 83.4 85.5 85.5 91.2 53.8 64.8BURLINGTON CITY BURLINGTON 77.7 76.8 72 69.1 71 62.2 73.2 79.7 81.8 81.8 80.8 51.8 66.1GARFIELD BERGEN 69 67.5 70.6 71.1 69.6 63.2 81 82.2 84.4 84.4 90.3 55.5 63.4GLOUCESTER CITY CAMDEN 80.4 78.1 80.6 77.9 86.2 76.4 85 77.2 91.9 91.9 87.8 55.7 62.9HARRISON HUDSON 77.1 65.9 77.4 83.6 62.6 76.6 78.6 84.4 84.5 84.5 88.7 65.9 60.8JERSEY CITY HUDSON 64 63.1 63.6 65.4 63.9 63.8 69.3 80.8 80.5 80.5 86.8 42.7 49.6LONG BRANCH MONMOUTH 65.5 63.8 64.1 72.7 68 68.3 71.9 80.4 83.3 83.3 88 55.4 59.4PEMBERTON TOWNSHIP BURLINGTON 69.1 79.7 74 76.7 80.1 76.3 75.9 83.1 85.6 85.6 85.1 46.3 61.8PHILLIPSBURG WARREN 79 85.1 85.6 83.5 87 84.1 91.1 89.7 92.8 92.8 92.2 60.3 75.4PLAINFIELD UNION 69.1 60 54 62.1 58.1 59.8 53.7 63.9 77.6 77.6 80.2 32.3 34.6NEPTUNE TOWNSHIP MONMOUTH 76.8 72.3 54 74.4 71.3 64.2 77.3 86.1 85.6 85.6 85.9 55.9 65.9HOBOKEN HUDSON 64.5 76.7 74.9 88.5 78.8 66.2 75.4 72 84.3 84.3 91.6 60.6 73.3AVERAGE LOW INCOME URBAN 63.5 63.0 61.7 67.2 62.6 60.6 67.0 72.5 75.5 75.5 81.0 43.1 50.4MEDIAN LOW INCOME URBAN 64.8 63.1 63.3 66.2 62.6 63.2 68.6 73.8 77.8 77.8 83.6 45.5 52.1SUM LOW INCOME URBAN 60.6 60.3 59.5 63.9 59.4 59.5 64.9 71.9 76 76 81.1 40.2 47.7STATE 82.2 83.2 83.5 85.4 82.8 83.6 87.1 89.6 91.6 91.6 93.2 70.1 75.5

LAKEWOOD TOWNSHIP OCEAN 69.2 65.3 66.4 67.3 60.9 57.6 57.8 65.8 70.7 70.7 80.1 54.8 58.6BRICK TOWNSHIP OCEAN 86.4 89.6 87.2 88.8 85.8 86.7 90.6 90.9 91.9 91.9 93.5 71 79.3HOWELL MONMOUTH 90.9 87.2 90.2 95.4 94.7 95.7 98.7 98.7 98.8 98.8 98.8 79.4 83.5JACKSON TWSP. OCEAN 86 90.8 89.2 87 84.5 85.8 93.5 93.7 93.8 93.8 95.8 73.2 81.3TOMS RIVER REGIONAL OCEAN 85.5 89.1 87.5 87 83.4 87.2 88.5 92.4 93.8 93.8 94.6 71.4 77.7

26


District NameASBURY PARKBRIDGETONCAMDEN CITYEAST ORANGEELIZABETHIRVINGTON TOWNSHIPKEANSBURG BOROUGHMILLVILLENEW BRUNSWICKNEWARKORANGE TOWNSHIP, CITY OFPASSAIC CITYPATERSONPERTH AMBOYPLEASANTVILLESALEM CITYTRENTONUNION CITYVINELAND CITYWEST NEW YORKBURLINGTON CITYGARFIELDGLOUCESTER CITYHARRISONJERSEY CITYLONG BRANCHPEMBERTON TOWNSHIPPHILLIPSBURGPLAINFIELDNEPTUNE TOWNSHIPHOBOKENAVERAGE LOW INCOME URBANMEDIAN LOW INCOME URBANSUM LOW INCOME URBANSTATE

LAKEWOOD TOWNSHIPBRICK TOWNSHIPHOWELLJACKSON TWSP.TOMS RIVER REGIONAL










2004 % SPEC ED PASS HSPA LA

2004 % SPEC ED PASS HSPA MATH




25 30.3 14.4 13.2 19 16.7 29.5 29.5 33.3 0.0 19.443.2 32.8 40.5 40.1 42.4 45.2 51.7 51.7 53.5 11.922.5 22.1 25.6 13.2 16.1 18 19.7 19.7 25.1 33.3 5.931.3 37.3 22.9 36.3 38.4 50.9 46.8 46.8 42.7 0.0 0.0 11.144.7 37 43.8 42.9 49.3 50.3 63.2 63.2 62.2 16.725.6 20.3 29.8 20.5 17.3 23.5 32.2 32.2 31.6 0.0 0.0 3.667.2 71.1 65.9 58.8 58.7 50.5 62.6 62.6 62.5 41.7 21.250.8 60.4 60.7 51 62.4 62.1 64 64 64.2 0.0 0.0 1951.9 50.2 51.9 55.9 54.6 47.4 52.2 52.2 53.6 15.640.3 39.7 40.3 42.6 46.4 50.6 60.8 60.8 53 15.2 2.3 11.4 6.7 10.322.5 24.6 27.1 23.5 26.2 30.9 46.6 46.6 39.4 4.8 3.244.4 34.8 41.8 38.2 41.9 39.7 53.2 53.2 46.1 21.945.5 39.7 34.2 31.9 33 30.9 49.7 49.7 43.2 6.1 9.1 7.349.9 47.1 48.3 43.2 54.4 55.6 61.4 61.4 57.7 22.636.7 28.4 29.1 29.3 27.9 29.6 32 32 38.3 33.3 9.1 7.753.8 48.8 58.6 37.3 49.2 45.3 42.7 42.7 47.628 19.5 21 17.7 24.9 26.5 36.4 36.4 39.2 861.1 58.3 59.1 59.2 58.8 59.8 67.3 67.3 68.2 50.0 25.8 45.5 11.2 23.362.2 55.2 58.4 53.4 51.6 54.8 67 67 63.5 2369.9 70.8 59.5 64.8 62 65.7 74.6 74.6 69.4 37.564 50.7 52.8 53.7 42.6 52.8 58.8 58.8 66.4 0.0 0.0 17.271.3 60.3 62.1 56.7 61.3 56.9 69.2 69.2 63.9 20.7 10.7 13.377.3 67.8 78.4 61.5 67.8 64.7 76.3 76.3 65.6 37.968.3 71.4 50.4 66.2 62.9 68.1 71.1 71.1 71.3 5049.5 48.4 48.6 47.3 50.9 60.3 63.2 63.2 65.9 11.9 6.3 20.8 12.8 1459.8 44.4 50 47.6 46.6 50 60.9 60.9 60.1 27.660.2 58 62.4 52.9 54.9 57.7 63.8 63.8 61.5 33.3 14.3 60 34.8 2078.2 70.2 79.5 74.2 75.7 77.4 74.3 74.3 73.7 39.4 25.0 42.1 24.3 24.536.6 45 39.8 29.8 32.3 27.5 48.6 48.6 48.2 15.4 7.9 23.3 10.3 17.636.6 60 61.6 48.5 54.9 57.9 62.6 62.6 54.3 17.663.7 75.3 64.1 52.5 36.2 33.1 60.7 60.7 60.2 25.5

49.7 47.7 47.8 44.0 45.8 47.1 55.6 55.6 54.4 14.7 10.2 32.3 15.0 18.549.9 48.4 50.0 47.3 49.2 50.5 60.8 60.8 57.7 9.0 6.3 33.3 11.0 17.6

47.6 44.5 45.5 43.1 46.2 48.7 57.1 57.1 54.6 26.1 15.6 30 17 15.875.9 73.4 74.8 72.7 74.1 75.2 79.7 79.7 78.9 62.1 46.3 64.8 49.9 44.9

56.5 49.6 48.4 42.9 32.7 36.7 43.8 43.8 42.6 40.9 21.7 27.778.7 75.5 79.3 68.4 70.9 78.6 77 77 79.5 49.3 23.8 65.5 47.4 54.786.7 88 86.9 86.2 91.4 88 90.6 90.6 91.8 0.0 0.0 54.781.6 75.8 76.7 75.8 80.8 78.2 84.6 84.6 82.7 41.1 22.8 61.3 39.3 52.977.1 70.9 71.8 75.2 73 74.3 81.8 81.8 80.9 57.1 30.3 75 41.4 44.9

27



















14.3 7.1 3.6 14.4 12.5 12.54.7 19.6 3.5 40.5 10.5 13.2 22.9 15.8 15.80.9 8 2 25.67.6 6.4 4.4 22.9 16.1 23.1 33.7 33.77 11.2 2.6 43.8 16.7 20.2 26 36.9 16.8 36.9 16.83.8 4.4 29.8 10.2 24.3 15 1521.9 27.3 13.6 65.9 11.1 46.9 18.7 46.9 18.79.8 31.3 13.4 60.7 28.1 14.5 39.5 17.8 47.5 47.511.9 17.7 6.6 34.1 86.0 35.3 21.6 37.2 26.8 28.9 46.5 19.7 46.5 19.74.9 12.1 4.6 40.3 14.5 16.5 25.7 11.1 37.6 13.2 37.6 13.2

3.1 3.2 27.1 26.8 26.85.3 12.6 4 18 59.8 16 20 27.9 28.4 28.44.5 9.3 1.5 34.2 15.6 23.8 32.6 12.1 32.6 12.111.5 15.4 13.5 11.8 60.1 14.6 24.5 15.4 38.3 31.7 22 31.7 2215 20.8 12.5 29.1 32.44.8 27.3 18.2 58.6 14.3 11.8 11.82.6 10.9 0.7 21.0 10.3 12.5 35.6 35.619.8 30.7 10.7 26.2 85.3 37.1 22.6 47.7 30.6 55.3 27.1 64.5 40.7 64.5 40.716.6 22.5 12.4 13.3 71.7 10.5 22.3 23.1 11.4 40.9 17.9 40.9 17.917.5 44.4 20 36.4 95.9 42.2 21.9 54.9 25.5 61.4 36.2 69.2 23 69.2 2313.8 19.4 8.6 52.8 23.3 26.316.3 18.6 2.3 62.1 11.1 31.3 15.6 41.5 12.5 59.6 21.1 59.6 21.135.7 32.1 35.7 51.7 130.1 36.7 36.614.3 47.4 10.5 50.4 36.4 15.4 50 15 50 152.9 16.3 5.1 19.2 67.8 15.5 19.6 36.2 11.1 25.6 11.7 25.6 11.712.5 17 4.3 31.7 81.7 26.4 12.7 51.3 54.5 54.58.1 25.4 15.6 62.4 30 10.2 45.8 17 45.8 1716.3 36.1 23.6 79.5 24 68.3 20.6 68.3 20.616.4 18.9 20 39.8 16.4 16.2 32.8 41.3 16.1 41.3 16.116.4 29.6 11.3 61.6 35 12.9 48 49.2 12.7 49.2 12.711.8 64.1 43.3 10.3 41.7 16.7 41.7 16.7

11.6 20.1 9.9 26.9 55.6 21.4 20.9 25.8 20.7 33.0 16.2 40.7 18.2 40.7 18.211.9 18.8 8.6 26.2 59.8 16.2 21.9 21.3 17.8 29.5 11.3 41.1 16.9 41.1 16.9

8.7 17.3 7.4 15.6 61.1 17.6 23.2 30.4 10.9 38.7 14.9 38.7 14.931.6 48.3 29.7 43.2 118.0 46.5 29.4 56.3 32.7 61.7 34.5 67.8 38.2 67.8 38.2

14.9 30.6 9.4 11.6 60.0 16.7 34.1 11.4 47.5 21.6 47.5 21.640.2 57 36.5 79.3 41.8 72.2 37.6 72.2 37.638.9 75 51.4 86.9 79.8 58 93.2 65.5 93.6 54.4 94.1 64.7 94.1 64.738.3 56.1 28.4 76.7 45.2 26.9 65.4 24.1 72.7 39.6 72.7 39.629.7 39.9 19.2 71.8 52.8 27.8 59.9 31.2 62.4 32.6 67.8 67.8

28






2004 % LEP PASS HSPA LA

2004 % LEP PASS HSPA MATH











25 9.1 6.7 7.123.5 9.1 6.3 16.7

2.9 5.7 2.245.5 10.5 15.8 21.9 12.5 29.6 25.9 23.8 14.346.7 16.9 24.2 30.1 19.8 29.8 25.1 30.2 26.7 25.9 21.930.2 3.8 18.9 17.1 22.7 31.5 13.272 56

46.2 18.2 22.6 26.9 21.3 53.2 20.9 35.3 30.4 32.9 38.742 13.8 14.7 15.2 10.4 21.1 29.9 43 27.8 36.3 22.154.5 20.0 13.3 18.2 4.5 27.8 11.142.7 10.7 24.8 19.4 22 28 22.6 16.7 32.2 22.6 29.8 23.1 32.139.9 11.0 20.3 8.1 26.7 13 27.5 11.6 16.1 13.938.9 13 22.9 13.2 11.1 19.3 16.3 11.1 28.4 17.1 15.2 18.4 19.2

13.3 13.3 6.3 6.321.439 10.5 10.5 19.2 16 26.7 26.7 12.1 3 17.9 10.7 12.576.3 31.2 29.2 27.0 22.4 35.7 30.4 37.1 17.5 25.4 37.8 38.1 36.5 44.449.1 17.2 16.7 22.3 22.2 16 23.5 35.3 18.9 24.3 16 24 1580 30.9 29.4 17.9 12.5 33.3 6.7 26.7 51.2 46.3 31 25 34.8

55.8 18.6 21.9 37.5 13.6 45.5 40.4 70.2 36.5 51.9 2551.8 25.9 0.0 0.052.4 15.0 30.0 12.5 25 14.3 21.4 35.3 47.151.2 18.2 10.3 16.1 12.2 17.9 28.4 27.8 24.6 23.5 18.1 14.454.8 16.7 35.3 17.6 21.1 31.6 55 45 46.2 34.6 40.9 54.5

40.6 11.3 40.0 10.6 20.5 18.2 17.5 18.4 17.6 24.2 35.70.0 0.0 17.5 18.4

46.9 21.3 17.9 17.4 15.7 24.8 20.8 27.1 27.1 24.6 27.9 23.3 25.2 37.246.2 17.7 16.7 16.1 18.2 21.1 21.9 26.7 27.8 23.9 29.8 23.1 23.6 39.6

45.8 14.3 19.5 20.1 16.1 24.5 23.1 28.9 25.3 25.8 21.7 26.7 22.2 21.972 39.3 24.1 29.3 22.5 34.6 29.2 36.5 31.5 33.1 28.8 35.7 31.4 31.5

38.5 2.6 22.2 30.8 31.6 9.1 9.1 27.8 22.3 20.875.4 40.994.4 66.380 42.1 0.0 0.069.7 36.1 17.6 31.3 21.4 21.4 46.7 29.4 29.4

0

29








2012 % PASS HSPA LA










41.1 29.5 12.5 28.621.1 32.4 75.9 51.7 15.8 35 35 57.1

41.2 19.718.9 36.4 71.1 46.8 33.7 28.629.2 31.5 77.2 63.2 36.9 16.8 31 27.6 31 27.6 55.5 35.8

24 59.9 32.2 1579.8 62.6 46.9 18.781.2 64 47.5

25.5 27.5 29.5 75.6 52.2 46.5 19.7 30.7 15.4 30.7 15.4 44.4 13.923.5 39.3 46.4 77.8 60.8 37.6 13.2 36.5 43.2 36.5 43.2 31.8 36.7

69.2 46.6 26.827 30 68.5 53.2 28.4 39.7 39.7 53.7 20.822.1 22.7 71.8 49.7 32.6 12.1 23.9 30.4 23.9 30.4 40.229.7 28.3 32.2 65.5 61.4 31.7 22 32.2 34.9 32.2 34.9 14.3 14.3

16.7 65.9 3270.1 42.7 11.867.9 36.4 35.6 26.1 26.1 30.8

43.1 39.8 38.7 42.2 80.5 67.3 64.5 40.7 38.4 41.1 38.4 41.1 55.1 53.724.1 23.8 14.3 83.1 67 40.9 17.9 29.4 11.8 29.4 11.846.6 24.1 85.5 74.6 69.2 23 40.8 53.7 40.8 53.7 58.3 41.7

81.8 58.845.5 40.9 45.5 36.4 84.4 69.2 59.6 21.1 56 42.3 56 42.3 88.9 33.4

91.9 76.318.8 84.5 71.1 50 15 33.323.9 38.6 27 80.5 63.2 25.6 11.7 51.1 39.3 51.1 39.3 51 42.4

36.4 83.3 60.9 54.5 46.2 46.285.6 63.8 45.8 1792.8 74.3 68.3 20.6

38.1 32.4 77.6 48.6 41.3 16.1 57.1 41.4 57.1 41.4 40.9 13.685.6 62.6 49.2 12.784.3 60.7 41.7 16.7

29.1 32.1 31.9 33.3 75.5 55.6 40.7 18.2 38.3 34.6 38.3 34.6 44.5 30.625.5 28.3 32.3 36.4 77.8 60.8 41.1 16.9 36.5 39.3 36.5 39.3 42.7 34.6

27.2 25.2 31.6 27.8 76 57.1 38.7 14.9 34.6 31.1 34.6 31.1 44.3 31.634.8 33.3 42.4 35.7 91.6 79.7 67.8 38.2 46.7 39.9 46.7 39.9 54.3 38.8

24.1 17.9 70.7 43.8 47.5 21.6 47.1 23.591.9 77 72.2 37.6 21.4 21.4 21.4 21.498.8 90.6 94.1 64.793.8 84.6 72.7 39.6

63.6 45.5 93.8 81.8 67.8 68.8 31.3

30

Appendix5

31

2014 NJ ASK Grade 8 State Summary08/29/2014

District Name County

2014 % PASSLA

2013 % PASSLA

2012 % PASSLA

2011 % PASSLA

2010 % PASSLA

2009 % PASSLA

2008 % PASSLA

2007 % PASSLA

2006 % PASS LA

2005 % PASS LA

2004 % PASS LA

2014 % PASS MATH

2013 % PASS MATH

ASBURY PARK MONMOUTH 34 38 40.2 34.3 38.4 37.8 29.5 28.5 22.3 20.3 27.9 17 17BRIDGETON CUMBERLAND 44 54 58.2 59.4 56 61.9 57.3 43 45.4 32.3 33.8 42 39CAMDEN CITY CAMDEN 32 32 33 31.4 33.7 38.4 36.2 23.8 28.7 28.5 28 19 18EAST ORANGE ESSEX 56 58 57.1 52.4 51.7 59.1 54.8 44.8 42.4 38 33.9 39 35ELIZABETH UNION 68 72 72.2 71 65.9 63.1 57.1 45.3 42 42.9 43.8 62 58IRVINGTON TOWNSHIP ESSEX 49 52 48.4 48.1 51.3 46.4 50.7 35 33.5 37.3 35.1 30 33KEANSBURG BOROUGH MONMOUTH 57 65 67 61.4 72.6 76.4 74.2 47.9 55.9 50.6 57.4 37 36MILLVILLE CUMBERLAND 62 66 59.2 63.9 62.5 56.7 60.7 52.7 49.1 46.5 47.6 44 56NEW BRUNSWICK MIDDLESEX 48 58 53.8 50.4 53.1 54.1 57.8 42.8 46.3 46.1 42.6 45 44NEWARK ESSEX 51 56 57.7 57.1 57.7 55.9 56.4 49.9 44.9 47.1 44.5 42 42ORANGE TOWNSHIP, CITY OF ESSEX 55 55 54.7 51.8 59.1 52.9 50.5 36.3 33.3 31.4 31.7 34 29PASSAIC CITY PASSAIC 53 59 56 55.6 57.2 58.3 51.9 42.6 45.3 39.2 30.1 48 45PATERSON PASSAIC 54 62 58.7 53.7 57.5 52 56.3 46.1 48.1 46.1 45.7 46 46PERTH AMBOY MIDDLESEX 54 58 57.2 55.8 55.3 54.7 59.1 48.9 50.3 44.6 38.1 36 35PLEASANTVILLE ATLANTIC 48 54 61.3 63.4 54.1 55.7 52 33.6 36.6 42.2 39.7 38 40SALEM CITY SALEM 46 55 56.1 37.7 60.8 44.9 55.1 38.4 30.6 44.8 2004 SALEM CITY NOT YET DESIGNATED SPECIAL NEEDS36 30TRENTON MERCER 42 43 43.9 46.8 44 41 42.3 37.3 31.2 23.6 22 25 23UNION CITY HUDSON 76 77 78.6 80 79.8 74.5 75.6 72.4 76.6 63 68.3 70 68VINELAND CITY CUMBERLAND 70 66 73.2 70.9 74.4 66.7 65.5 57.3 54.3 50.1 51.3 67 56WEST NEW YORK HUDSON 71 77 77.2 76.3 75.7 75.5 79.1 70.9 66.8 68.8 70.8 67 69BURLINGTON CITY BURLINGTON 56 58 57.6 62.3 69.8 66.6 66.9 51.7 56.9 64.3 59.5 47 36GARFIELD BERGEN 81 74 73.6 78.3 78.4 78.6 71.5 67.8 60.4 63.7 63.4 82 68GLOUCESTER CITY CAMDEN 73 79 73.4 77.8 78.2 77.8 62 43.7 59.8 55.1 56.6 73 69HARRISON HUDSON 73 78 83 82.6 77.7 77.6 83.1 72.2 64.4 59.2 57.3 70 66JERSEY CITY HUDSON 63 64 66.7 65.2 61.5 61.7 59.8 51.6 53 56 49.9 53 55LONG BRANCH MONMOUTH 61 68 65.1 62.3 67.4 70.9 73.6 57.9 56.4 51.8 46.6 51 53PEMBERTON TOWNSHIP BURLINGTON 71 77 71.5 69.7 73.9 68.7 70.7 54.4 60 63.3 62.2 49 49PHILLIPSBURG WARREN 72 63 67.2 69.4 69.2 70.7 69.9 59 59.1 72.3 71.8 47 50PLAINFIELD UNION 52 60 55.4 64.1 55.3 52.2 48.5 31.1 43.3 62.6 46.8 34 31NEPTUNE TOWNSHIP MONMOUTH 65 58 64.9 66.7 71.9 63.8 60.8 60.7 52.3 52.1 50.6 47 45HOBOKEN HUDSON 61 56 62.8 65.2 74.5 75 73.6 73.5 85.9 84.7 80.3 33 30AVERAGE LOW INCOME URBAN 58 61 61 61 63 61 60 49 50 49 48 46 44MEDIAN LOW INCOME URBAN 56 59 59 62 62 62 59 48 49 47 47 45 44SUM LOW INCOME URBAN 57 61 60.8 59.6 59.9 58.1 57.4 47.8 47.3 46.6 44.6 47 46STATE 80 82 82.2 82.1 82.5 82 81.1 73.7 74.2 61.8 60.9 72 69

LAKEWOOD TOWNSHIP OCEAN 50 48 49 53.9 48.7 51.2 49.7 38.3 38.8 39.8 45.5 43 36BRICK TOWNSHIP OCEAN 85 89 89.2 87.3 90.4 87.9 87.2 82.9 82.8 80.6 78.8 80 73HOWELL TWP MONMOUTH 88 89 87.8 90 88.8 90.3 90.4 85.7 88.3 83.4 82.6 84 79JACKSON TWSP. OCEAN 83 85 85.3 88.6 89 89.4 91.3 85 86 82 80.4 78 76TOMS RIVER REGIONAL OCEAN 84 88 88.6 87.7 87.8 87.3 87.3 81 80.7 78.5 76.1 76 67

32



LAKEWOOD TOWNSHIPBRICK TOWNSHIPHOWELL TWPJACKSON TWSP.TOMS RIVER REGIONAL

2012 % PASS MATH

2011 % PASS MATH

2010 % PASS MATH

2009 % PASS MATH

2008 % PASS MATH

2007 % PASS MATH

2006 % PASS MATH

2005 % PASS MATH

2004 % PASS MATH

2014 % SPEC ED PASS LA

2014 % SPEC ED MATH


2013 % SPEC ED MATH


2012 % SPEC ED MATH

22.8 29.3 20.7 19.5 14.6 22.3 14.4 14.7 16.7 13.645.8 51.4 41.2 50 40.2 42.6 33.5 22.5 19.1 11 11 1117.8 17.2 17.3 24.5 18.2 14.5 12.8 13.7 14.544.5 38.5 33.7 43.1 31.5 31 26.9 22 25.8 20 19 17.9 15.461.6 55.3 50.4 47.8 36.7 33.5 30.4 32.7 30.7 22 22 29 18 27.8 1834.6 37.6 37.5 36.9 27.6 22.9 17.9 18.2 17.7 1754.4 40.5 52.9 65.5 43.3 57.7 53.8 50.3 53.7 1951.2 51 41.9 43.8 47.1 48.8 39 36.8 31.7 24 16 16.538.3 34.9 34.6 34.5 40.2 40.2 41.1 43.2 40 1845.2 45.4 40.6 41.9 37.2 35.3 31.2 30.3 35.5 13 11 19 12 18.7 13.439.3 30.1 41 35.5 24.5 25.5 22.7 20 20.3 12.338.8 41 38.4 40.7 34.9 36.4 30.1 25.5 19 14 20 30 29 1640 40.8 42.3 46.4 40.6 39.7 34.9 36.3 38.4 18 13 29 14 24.6 11.442.8 42.7 43.2 47.7 41.1 42.1 35.5 31.2 33.4 19 16 23 10 21.9 13.941.7 42.4 41.6 44.1 37.5 26.3 32.3 27.8 18.7 16 26.931.3 30 29.4 25 30.3 39.2 24.4 29.4 22 21 14.326.4 33.2 24.7 27.1 21.9 24.7 19 12.7 14.370.4 83.9 74.5 71.8 70.1 67.5 70.9 62.2 62.3 48 41 44 40 36.9 32.163.5 57.8 57.2 54.2 48.5 49.5 43.4 44.1 39.1 30 26 20 15 24.573.6 77.9 75.5 76.5 69.9 74.2 64.1 62.5 69.3 31 22 44 30 41.7 19.442 56.6 50.8 52.8 45.9 48.8 46.9 52.2 41.3 14 15 20.7 16.763 77 71.8 74.4 63.2 67.6 55.8 53.6 58.5 55 53 41 26 30.6 30.668 70.9 58 47.6 50 45.6 53.2 43.9 48.4 52 4365.3 62.3 51.2 65.1 55.1 47.7 35.3 41.1 44.2 40 36 40 28 37.9 24.155.5 52.7 41.1 46.8 43 47.1 42.6 42.9 42.7 22 17 24 17 25.7 1554.9 50.5 54.5 54.6 45.6 48.8 41.1 40.4 27.3 23 24 27 31.7 24.460.6 56.4 59.5 59.5 46.1 45.9 39.4 42.9 43.7 14 1544.4 47.6 41.4 54.3 50 62.5 49.7 62.4 61.7 39 14 23 18 29.4 17.631.7 37.4 27.2 37.6 28.8 28.2 22.2 53 32.7 14 11 17.147.1 46.3 45.9 46.8 49.7 56 40 36.8 41.8 11 14.347.5 56.3 51.8 55.1 52.8 57.2 75.9 71.2 68.2 18 13

47 48 45 47 41 43 38 38 37 24 22 26 21 25 1945 46 42 47 41 43 36 37 37 22 18 23 17 25 17

47.2 47.2 43.3 45.6 39.5 39.7 34.9 34 34.5 19 15 22 14 21.6 13.171.6 71.5 68.5 71.2 67.4 68.4 64.5 50 50.3 43 33 46 30 47.2 30.6

35.2 44.6 37.4 42.8 33 32.9 34.2 42 40 13 19 13.2 18.478.2 71.9 75.6 73.6 65.8 70.9 70.3 64.7 66.5 59 42 67 44 59.7 41.978.7 76.8 75.5 80.3 79.1 86.6 81.2 77.7 76.7 52 42 55 33 25.277.7 83.1 83.7 83.2 80.3 83.8 80.7 72.6 66.474.1 76 69.4 77.4 76.3 73.6 74 69.8 66 46 33 59.1 24

33





2011 % SPEC ED MATH


2010 % SPEC ED MATH


2009 % SPEC ED MATH


2008 % SPEC ED MATH


2007 % SPEC ED MATH


2006 % SPEC ED PASS MATH





11.1 14.3 5.8 2.3 4.8 7.1 1.713.5 22.4 12 16.2 18.2 9.2 14.1 6.9 12.2 7.5 7.1 1.3

3.8 1.4 2.8 2.4 5 1.8 0.8 1.115 14.9 15.2 16 10.8 7.8 4.9 8.3 4.3 4.1 4.823.5 13.3 20.7 16.7 15.5 13 10.3 6.3 7 5.7 7.5 7.2 8.5 8.3

11.8 4.9 2.4 0.9 1.9 1.8 1.325.9 8.1 13.5 12.9 16.1 4.3 20.9 11.1

16.3 11.8 10.1 11.3 5.5 7.3 7.8 2.2 5.414.3 17.7 10.3 24.2 16.5 20.4 16.7 13.9 17 15.7 18.9 19.2 17.9

24.7 17.3 22.7 11.8 19 19 13 7.7 12.3 9.6 12.2 6.7 9.4 9.410.4 14.8 10.2 8.5 5 2 1.9 5.3 2.423.6 13.8 18.8 25.6 12.3 11.3 10.1 9.5 6.7 2.9 6.7 4.2 2.5 4.213.6 10.1 20.4 18.9 20.5 18 12.6 13.7 10.2 8.9 10.4 10.2 8.8 10.619.1 12.4 26.1 12.5 23.1 15.9 20.8 16.1 14.1 15.3 18 8.2 11.8 6.1 6.414.7 11.8 21.2 18.2 23.9 13.3 19.1 12.8 15.9 10.4 13 15.7 3.4 3.3 13 2.8

18.8 16.1 8.7 8.7 4.2 9.4 7.916.8 16.2 10.8 4.7 3.6 7.2 2 4.9 1.860.4 73.6 56.8 65.2 35.4 38.1 42.3 42.3 41.3 33 47.7 44.2 19.4 23.3 27.1 29.521.8 13.9 29.7 11.3 10.4 20.8 8.9 8.1 7.3 8.5 7.7 7.7 1153.6 39.1 48.5 29.4 42.9 25.4 54.4 26 39.7 37.5 41.3 25.8 23.4 15.6 17.9 17.628.6 23.8 22.6 20 14.3 6.9 21.2 24.2 33.3 25 31.3 9.455.7 49.2 42.9 23.7 36.5 29 30.6 12.9 21.3 18.8 15.4 19.7 15.4 10.7 7.5 17.4

32.1 16.2 13.5 17.2 20 13.3 13.3 14.3 17.955.6 16.7 50 15.8 40 40 41.7 22.7 9.1 6.3 6.3 6.724.1 17 27.4 14 21.2 16.5 22.3 11.5 15 12.7 15.2 9.7 15.7 11.3 11.5 8.218.4 44.1 21.3 35.8 25 31.4 13.2 17 15.8 26.3 8.3 21 7.2 932.7 24.5 35.4 23 16.9 21.7 11.8 7.3 8.2 4.9 23 17.9 18.5 5.6

37.5 21.2 13.2 15.2 18.8 2.4 4.5 28.5 22.6 27.6 20.826.3 20.3 13.6 17.1 4.3 3.2 6.3 3.3 11.9 9.1 4.2 4.229 31 17.6 11.8 14 12.1 8.1 4 13.2 5.1 8.5 1.4

21.1 14.3 23.8 45.8 29.4 48.6 44.4 21.9 23.528 24 29 21 26 20 23 18 15 12 13 13 13 12 11 1024 17 23 17 23 17 19 13 13 11 8 9 9 9 9 9

22.2 14.9 22.9 12.5 20.1 13.1 19.1 10.6 13.8 10.8 11.6 10 11.3 8.8 9.1 8.247.6 31.3 47.7 28.7 47.2 30.4 44.2 27 32.9 28.8 32.7 25 17.4 14.7 16.8 14.1

28.6 13.6 19 21.4 9.4 10.9 3 6.3 7.9 10.4 11.4 7.162.7 38.7 71.5 61.1 31.1 54 39.4 47.8 35.4 47.4 31.6 42 32.862.4 33.4 55.2 32.1 55.9 32.8 55.9 33.9 50.4 53.2 54.5 37.4 40.7 37.6 35.6 29

56.6 51.6 57.2 47.5 53.8 53.7 46.2 42.2 34.3 24.3 38.8 19.631.9 53.3 36.4 49.1 29 37.4 33.1 41.7 28.2 36.4 34.7 28.3 18

34




2014 % LEP PASS LA

2014 % LEP PASS MATH

2013 % LEP PASS LA


2012 % LEP PASS LA


2011 % LEP PASS LA


2010 % LEP PASS LA


2009 % LEP PASS LA


2008 % LEP PASS LA


2007 % LEP PASS LA

#REF! 28.617 22 31.6 28.6 10.3 4.3

0 4.229 19 30 32.3 17.6 42.9 28.6 23.543 39 47 32 49.1 38.3 45.9 32.9 42.9 30.7 37.4 30.1 13.333 0 12.8 8

190

18 36.3 27.9 23.5 23.8 26.6 12.828 29 31 23 35.5 25.2 32.9 19.9 44.6 41.2 46.6 47.7 38.4

0 17.4 14.8 15.4 21.4 7.139 30 30 47.1 19.3 32.9 14.3 45.5 35.3 24.6 42.1 30.130 28 43 24 33 22.8 33.2 23.9 27.5 21.5 22.1 28.2 1816 15 33 14 23.7 17.9 30.4 38.6 33.9 30.5 44.8 1921 0 11.8 36 32 38.9 27.8 21.4

00 20 20.3 14.8

44 51 84 42 64.5 56.6 54 65.8 56.9 59.3 60.3 57.8 55.8 52.6 48.135 29 16.7 35.3 26.5 11.5 22.2 14.3

27 36 74 26 29.8 40.3 39.3 50.8 30.9 47.1 32.2 55.9 25.5 23.4 18.30

25 58 68 73 38.1 57.2 40.9 45.5 44.8 44.8 45.995

47 56 68 50 72.7 63.6 40 5037 35 40 39 35.8 26.3 36.5 30.8 31.1 24.3 32.7 22.6 27.2 23.6 17.515 25 27 33.3 43.5 40 54.6 50 36.8 48 12.5

041 27

27 11 32.9 38.5 34.9 25.8 22.2 9.31130

31 35 27 34 35 35 34 35 34 38 37 33 35 30 1929 32 22 29 33 32 35 31 35 39 35 28 29 25 1630 29 36 25 34.6 25.8 34 27.9 34.3 30.1 35.6 30.9 35.9 26.4 23.336 38 76 35 40.6 35.4 38.3 35.2 38.9 35.9 40.3 37.7 37.7 30.9 27.4

32 44 32.1 36.7 31 23.7 11.4 8.839 62 110 56

89 46.2 53.9 46.2 18.2 62.500 45 45 21.4

35





2006 % LEP PASS LA


2005 % LEP PASS LA


2004 % LEP PASS LA


0 10.523.1 0 5.61.6 0 2.1 6.14.3 29.2 0 6.3 5 7.1 7.115.7 2.7 0 4 11.9 15.7 177.1 0

016.7 020.4 11.9 0 1.7 11.5 8.1 14.127.8 22.8 0 30.9 25.7 22.4 32.19.5 5 0 4 4 3.4 6.836.5 2.9 0 3.1 8.6 7.6 8.519.8 9.3 0 9.6 12.5 11.6 17.620.4 12.1 0 8.6 4.6 14.1 11.126.7 20 0 8.3 16.7 25

0 8.4 12.36.2 19.5 0 2.6 4.3 1.647.6 32.9 0 22.3 30 30.2 35.812.5 4 0 6.9 16.2 8.3 2.731.7 2.1 0 2.5 32.7 32.7

062.1 4 0 15.4 11.5 16.2 27

07.1 021.6 14.4 0 8.3 15.2 11.6 26.918.5 15.4 0 14.3 12.5 6.3

00 19.7 24.2 17.5 23.6

14.8 5.8 0 11.9 21.400

21 13 0 10 12 13 1819 12 0 8 12 12 17

24.4 13.6 0 11.2 14.2 14.6 19.431 15.8 0 12.2 18.7 10.9 18.4

11.6 0 5.6 41.2 7.9 23.733.3 0 45.5 27.375 0 36.4 16.7 25

012.5 0 8.3 18.8 25.1

36

Appendix6

37

DISTRICTNAME

COUNTYNAME

SCHOOLNAME

2014AdjustedCohort

GradRate

2013Adjusted

CohortGradRate

2012Adjusted

CohortGradRate

2011AdjustedCohortGrad

RateASBURYPARKCITY MONMOUTH

DistrictwideTotal 49.26% 50.69% 49.02% 59.46%

BRIDGETONCITY CUMBERLANDDistrictwideTotal 71.01% 68.38% 67.25% 67.96%

CAMDENCITY CAMDENDistrictwideTotal 61.70% 53.42% 49.27% 56.89%

EASTORANGE ESSEXDistrictwideTotal 71.87% 69.90% 70.79% 64.08%

ELIZABETHCITY UNIONDistrictwideTotal 72.60% 71.05% 65.70% 67.00%

IRVINGTONTOWNSHIP ESSEX


KEANSBURGBORO MONMOUTH


MILLVILLECITY CUMBERLANDDistrictwideTotal 86.17% 82.33% 81.57% 82.93%

NEWBRUNSWICKCITY MIDDLESEX


NEWARKCITY ESSEXDistrictwideTotal 68.63% 67.70% 68.72% 61.26%

CITYOFORANGETWP ESSEX


PASSAICCITY PASSAICDistrictwideTotal 76.32% 71.32% 60.80% 62.70%

PATERSONCITY PASSAICDistrictwideTotal 74.51% 72.11% 66.39% 64.03%

PERTHAMBOYCITY MIDDLESEX


PLEASANTVILLECITY ATLANTIC


SALEMCITY SALEMDistrictwideTotal 69.44% 75.47% 75.69% 67.88%

TRENTONCITY MERCERDistrictwideTotal 52.95% 48.55% 48.44% 47.71%

VINELANDCITY CUMBERLANDDistrictwideTotal 76.57% 71.77% 68.73% 80.36%

UNIONCITY HUDSONDistrictwideTotal 80.63% 79.17% 82.87% 89.46%

WESTNEWYORKTOWN HUDSON


BURLINGTONCITY BURLINGTONDistrictwideTotal 82.22% 78.20% 76.36% 85.94%

GARFIELDCITY BERGENDistrictwideTotal 87.32% 78.05% 79.36% 78.62%

38

GLOUCESTERCITY CAMDENDistrictwideTotal 86.21% 82.86% 86.62% 83.02%

HARRISONTOWN HUDSONDistrictwideTotal 90.48% 91.44% 92.70% 92.44%

JERSEYCITY HUDSONDistrictwideTotal 67.15% 67.46% 67.34% 69.92%

LONGBRANCHCITY MONMOUTH


PEMBERTONTWP BURLINGTONDistrictwideTotal 84.27% 83.87% 83.67% 85.37%

PHILLIPSBURGTOWN WARREN


PLAINFIELDCITY UNIONDistrictwideTotal 89.42% 77.32% 71.98% 65.62%

NEPTUNETWP MONMOUTHDistrictwideTotal 78.33% 76.80% 76.44% 83.76%

HOBOKENCITY HUDSONDistrictwideTotal 86.78% 85.43% 74.53% 81.99%

ABBOTTAVERAGE 76.03% 72.98% 71.59% 72.28%ABBOTTMEDIAN 76.57% 75.47% 71.98% 69.92%STATEAVERAGE 89.61% 89.12% 88.41% 88.31%STATEMEDIAN 92.35% 92.52% 91.79% 91.94%

LAKEWOODTWP OCEANDistrictwideTotal 74.34% 71.17% 73.24% 70.11%

BRICKTWP OCEANDistrictwideTotal 88.64% 86.97% 88.74% 87.39%

FREEHOLDREGIONAL MONMOUTH

HOWELLHIGHSCHOOL 97.09% 95.57% 96.39% 96.18%

JACKSONTWP OCEANDistrictwideTotal 92.16% 95.58% 93.87% 93.42%

TOMSRIVERREGIONAL OCEAN


39

Appendix7

40

This table presents the list of peer schools in alphabetical order by county name that was created specifically for this school (highlighted in yellow). Peer schools are drawn from across the state and represent schools that have similar grade configurations and that are educating students of similar demographic characteristics, as measured by enrollment in Free/Reduced Lunch Programs, Limited English Proficiency or Special Education Programs.

SCHOOL NAMEDISTRICT NAMECOUNTY NAMEFRPL LEP SpED

09-12CAMDEN 88.6% 18.8% 28.4%

09-12CAPE MAY 74.2% 3.6% 32.1%

09-12CHARTERS 79.9% 0.0% 19.3%

09-12CHARTERS 83.0% 2.9% 12.0%

KG-12CHARTERS 83.7% 0.0% 7.6%

KG-12CHARTERS 79.1% 0.0% 7.9%

09-12CHARTERS 79.2% 0.0% 18.2%

09-12ESSEX 83.5% 10.7% 22.0%

06-12ESSEX 85.4% 0.0% 7.0%

07-12ESSEX 78.6% 0.3% 6.4%

07-12ESSEX 79.8% 0.1% 2.1%

07-12ESSEX 80.9% 0.0% 7.1%

09-12HUDSON 86.4% 6.6% 15.1%

09-12HUDSON 70.3% 0.5% 32.1%

09-12HUDSON 82.4% 11.1% 15.5%

09-12MERCER 84.6% 10.1% 18.0%

09-12MERCER 81.7% 0.5% 16.8%

PK-12MIDDLESEX 86.2% 10.6% 16.9%

09-12MONMOUTH 87.0% 17.0% 18.3%

09-12MONMOUTH 73.2% 1.1% 20.7%

09-12OCEAN 81.6% 4.6% 15.3%

09-12PASSAIC 77.0% 3.4% 16.1%

09-12PASSAIC 87.2% 22.9% 22.3%

09-12PASSAIC 87.1% 18.5% 17.9%

09-12PASSAIC 90.6% 18.4% 15.4%

09-12SALEM 75.7% 0.6% 18.1%

09-12UNION 89.9% 11.6% 12.7%

09-12UNION 88.5% 3.6% 5.7%

09-12UNION 82.3% 7.9% 14.4%

09-12UNION 82.1% 1.7% 3.4%

09-12UNION 86.9% 19.8% 15.8%

29-2520-050LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOLSCHOOL PEER GROUP

GRADESPAN

CDS CODE

WOODROW WILSON HIGH SCHOOL

WILDWOOD HIGH SCHOOL

ACADEMY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL

CAMDEN ACADEMY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOLNORTH STAR ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS OF NEWARKPATERSON CHARTER SCHOOL FOR SCIENCE/TECHNOLOGYUNIVERSITY ACADEMY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOLORANGE HIGH SCHOOL

AMERICAN HISTORY HIGH SCHOOL

ARTS HIGH SCHOOL

SCIENCE PARK HIGH SCHOOL

UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL

HARRISON HIGH SCHOOL

HENRY SNYDER HIGH SCHOOL

MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL

TRENTON CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL - MAIN CAMPUSTRENTON CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL - WEST CAMPUSNEW BRUNSWICK HIGH SCHOOL

ASBURY PARK HIGH SCHOOL

KEANSBURG HIGH SCHOOL

LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL

PASSAIC COUNTY-MANCHESTER REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOLSCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE AND CONSTRUCTION TRADESSCHOOL OF CULINARY ARTS HOSPITALITY AND TOURISMSCHOOL OF SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY ENGG & MATHEMATICSSALEM HIGH SCHOOL

ADMIRAL WILLIAM F. HALSEY JR. LEADERSHIP ACADEMYALEXANDER HAMILTON PREPARATORY ACADEMYTHOMAS JEFFERSON ARTS ACADEMYBARACK OBAMA ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC & CIVIC DEVELOPMENTPLAINFIELD HIGH SCHOOL

07-0680-040

09-5790-050

80-6010-910

80-6212-903

80-7320-960

80-7503-970

80-8060-990

13-3880-050

13-3570-087

13-3570-010

13-3570-055

13-3570-057

17-2060-050

17-2390-050

17-5670-050

21-5210-050

21-5210-051

23-3530-050

25-0100-010

25-2400-010

29-2520-050

31-3980-010

31-4010-307

31-4010-002

31-4010-304

33-4630-050

39-1320-402

39-1320-405

39-1320-403

39-4160-051

39-4160-050

CAMDEN CITY

WILDWOOD CITY

ACADEMY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOLCAMDEN ACADEMY CHARTER HSNORTH STAR ACAD. CS OF NEWARKPATERSON CS FOR SCI/TECH

UNIVERSITY ACADEMY CS

CITY OF ORANGE TWP

NEWARK CITY

NEWARK CITY

NEWARK CITY

NEWARK CITY

HARRISON TOWN

JERSEY CITY

WEST NEW YORK TOWN

TRENTON CITY

TRENTON CITY

NEW BRUNSWICK CITY

ASBURY PARK CITY

KEANSBURG BORO

LAKEWOOD TWP

PASSAIC CO MANCHESTER REGPATERSON CITY

PATERSON CITY

PATERSON CITY

SALEM CITY

ELIZABETH CITY

ELIZABETH CITY

ELIZABETH CITY

PLAINFIELD CITY

PLAINFIELD CITY

41

CUMBERLAND

CUMBERLAND

CUMBERLAND



PK-08ATLANTIC 91.0% 4.1% 11.1%

PK-08CAMDEN 98.4% 27.4% 16.1%

PK-08CAMDEN 96.2% 22.1% 14.4%

PK-08CAMDEN 98.3% 22.3% 15.2%

05-08CHARTERS 92.0% 5.3% 12.2%

KG-08CHARTERS 90.2% 0.4% 10.3%

PK-08CHARTERS 88.3% 0.0% 10.0%

04-08CHARTERS 90.7% 0.0% 15.9%

KG-08 97.1% 27.5% 10.7%

KG-08 91.7% 3.0% 7.1%

KG-08 92.2% 1.3% 6.4%

03-08ESSEX 86.6% 0.3% 30.7%

PK-08ESSEX 89.9% 1.4% 18.4%

KG-08ESSEX 92.9% 10.9% 9.5%

PK-08ESSEX 90.0% 4.8% 16.1%

PK-08ESSEX 88.8% 2.5% 20.5%

06-08MERCER 92.1% 7.3% 18.3%

06-08MERCER 90.9% 1.2% 19.1%

06-08MERCER 88.6% 2.4% 23.7%

06-08MIDDLESEX 92.7% 12.6% 13.2%

06-08OCEAN 90.7% 3.5% 13.7%

KG-08PASSAIC 92.2% 8.2% 9.9%

06-08PASSAIC 93.3% 12.1% 13.5%

06-08PASSAIC 96.0% 21.3% 17.5%

KG-08PASSAIC 94.4% 11.6% 16.9%

PK-08PASSAIC 94.1% 18.9% 10.8%

KG-08PASSAIC 91.5% 9.5% 8.5%

PK-08PASSAIC 93.3% 7.2% 8.5%

05-08PASSAIC 91.1% 6.1% 24.7%

KG-08UNION 93.0% 16.5% 19.8%

06-08UNION 94.3% 15.7% 18.6%

29-2520-083LAKEWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOLSCHOOL PEER GROUP

GRADESPAN

CDS CODE

UPTOWN SCHOOL COMPLEX

CHARLES SUMNER ELEMENTARY SCHOOLOCTAVIO V. CATTO FAMILY SCHOOLTHOMAS H. DUDLEY FAMILY SCHOOLCAMDEN'S PROMISE CHARTER SCHOOLLADY LIBERTY ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLMARION P. THOMAS CHARTER SCHOOLPAUL ROBESON CHARTER SCHOOL FOR THE HUMANITIESBROAD STREET SCHOOL

QUARTER MILE LAND SCHOOL

WEST AVENUE SCHOOL

CHANCELLOR AVENUE SCHOOL

CLEVELAND EIGHTEENTH AVENUE SCHOOLDR. E. ALMA FLAGG SCHOOL

RAFAEL HERNANDEZ SCHOOL

THIRTEENTH AVENUE SCHOOL MARTIN LUTHER KINGDUNN MIDDLE SCHOOL

JOYCE KILMER MIDDLE SCHOOL

LUIS MUNOZ-RIVERA MS

NEW BRUNSWICK MIDDLE SCHOOL

LAKEWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL

ALEXANDER HAMILTON ACADEMY

DON BOSCO ACADEMY

NEW ROBERTO CLEMENTE

REV DR FRANK NAPIER JR SCHOOL

SCHOOL 21

SCHOOL 26

SCHOOL 6/ACADEMY OF PERFORMING ARTSSCHOOL 7

BENJAMIN FRANKLIN SCHOOL NO. 13HUBBARD MIDDLE SCHOOL

01-0110-080

07-0680-310

07-0680-145

07-0680-190

80-6215-910

80-7100-936

80-7210-940

80-6025-907

11-0540-030

11-0540-100

11-0540-130

13-3570-330

13-3570-350

13-3570-415

13-3570-575

13-3570-715

21-5210-100

21-5210-235

21-5210-240

23-3530-055

29-2520-083

31-4010-043

31-4010-301

31-4010-316

31-4010-080

31-4010-250

31-4010-290

31-4010-100

31-4010-110

39-1320-160

39-4160-060

ATLANTIC CITY

CAMDEN CITY

CAMDEN CITY

CAMDEN CITY

CAMDEN'S PROMISE CS

LADY LIBERTY ACADEMY CSMARION P. THOMAS CS

PAUL ROBESON HUMANITIES CSBRIDGETON CITY

BRIDGETON CITY

BRIDGETON CITY

NEWARK CITY

NEWARK CITY

NEWARK CITY

NEWARK CITY

NEWARK CITY

TRENTON CITY

TRENTON CITY

TRENTON CITY

NEW BRUNSWICK CITY

LAKEWOOD TWP

PATERSON CITY

PATERSON CITY

PATERSON CITY

PATERSON CITY

PATERSON CITY

PATERSON CITY

PATERSON CITY

PATERSON CITY

ELIZABETH CITY

PLAINFIELD CITY

42

CUMBERLAND



PK-06CAMDEN 98.1% 24.7% 13.3%

PK-06CAMDEN 98.2% 12.1% 14.2%

PK-05CAPE MAY 90.2% 35.0% 13.2%

KG-05CHARTERS 99.3% 10.1% 10.1%

KG-05CHARTERS 95.9% 0.0% 7.9%

KG-03CHARTERS 92.3% 3.1% 3.9%

KG-05 91.2% 31.1% 13.7%

PK-04ESSEX 91.2% 21.1% 4.5%

PK-04ESSEX 92.4% 25.7% 9.0%

PK-04HUDSON 97.1% 30.6% 14.3%

PK-06HUDSON 94.7% 17.7% 8.8%

KG-05MERCER 89.8% 0.6% 0.0%

KG-05MERCER 93.8% 18.1% 12.1%

KG-05MERCER 95.9% 17.7% 9.9%

KG-05MERCER 89.8% 21.9% 1.1%

KG-05MERCER 94.5% 28.5% 9.9%

KG-05MIDDLESEX 92.8% 30.0% 10.4%

PK-05MIDDLESEX 92.6% 20.9% 9.1%

PK-05MIDDLESEX 88.4% 30.4% 9.5%

KG-04MIDDLESEX 91.7% 31.5% 6.8%

PK-05MONMOUTH 91.5% 27.1% 8.2%

01-05OCEAN 93.4% 30.9% 11.9%

04-06PASSAIC 96.4% 26.8% 16.1%

PK-06PASSAIC 94.5% 43.3% 14.8%

KG-04PASSAIC 94.4% 7.1% 6.6%

PK-04PASSAIC 92.8% 16.9% 5.8%

KG-04PASSAIC 88.7% 28.6% 9.5%

KG-05UNION 92.3% 42.9% 13.3%

PK-05UNION 95.4% 44.5% 16.2%

KG-05UNION 86.8% 27.9% 5.8%

01-04UNION 82.7% 44.5% 7.0%

29-2520-080ELLA G CLARKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLSCHOOL PEER GROUP

GRADESPAN

CDS CODE

ALFRED CRAMER COLLEGE PREPARATORY LAB SCHOOLRAFAEL CORDERO MOLINA ELEMENTARY SCHOOLGLENWOOD AVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLCAMDEN COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOLNEW HORIZONS COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOLROSEVILLE COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOLGLORIA M SABATER ELEMENTARY SCHOOLELLIOTT STREET ELEMENTARY SCHOOLROBERTO CLEMENTE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLJEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

PUBLIC SCHOOL NUMBER FIVE

JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

MOTT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

PARKER ELEMENTARY

PAUL S. ROBESON ELEMENTARY SCHOOLWILSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

A CHESTER REDSHAW SCHOOL

LORD STLRLING ELEMENTARY SCHOOLROOSEVELT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLHERBERT N. RICHARDSON 21ST CENTURY SCHOOLAUDREY W. CLARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOLELLA G CLARKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLETTA GERO SCHOOL # 9

MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. SCHOOL # 6SCHOOL 14

SCHOOL 19

SCHOOL 29


WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLWOODLAND ELEMENTARY SCHOOLHARRISON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

07-0680-170

07-0680-250

09-5790-060

80-6063-945

80-7290-957

80-6058-939

11-5390-075

13-3570-390

13-3570-615

17-5240-100

17-5670-090

21-5210-230

21-5210-260

21-5210-270

21-5210-080

21-5210-310

23-3530-060

23-3530-100

23-3530-125

23-4090-130

25-2770-090

29-2520-080

31-3970-125

31-3970-100

31-4010-180

31-4010-230

31-4010-311

39-4160-150

39-4160-180

39-4160-190

39-4540-020

CAMDEN CITY

CAMDEN CITY

WILDWOOD CITY

CAMDEN COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOLNEW HORIZONS COMM. CS

ROSEVILLE COMMUNITY CS

VINELAND CITY

NEWARK CITY

NEWARK CITY

UNION CITY

WEST NEW YORK TOWN

TRENTON CITY

TRENTON CITY

TRENTON CITY

TRENTON CITY

TRENTON CITY

NEW BRUNSWICK CITY

NEW BRUNSWICK CITY

NEW BRUNSWICK CITY

PERTH AMBOY CITY

LONG BRANCH CITY

LAKEWOOD TWP

PASSAIC CITY

PASSAIC CITY

PATERSON CITY

PATERSON CITY

PATERSON CITY

PLAINFIELD CITY

PLAINFIELD CITY

PLAINFIELD CITY

ROSELLE BORO

43



PK-05ATLANTIC 89.2% 10.5% 9.5%

KG-05ATLANTIC 91.2% 6.4% 8.6%

KG-05ATLANTIC 86.8% 39.5% 16.8%

PK-05CAMDEN 96.8% 3.5% 11.7%

PK-06CAMDEN 95.7% 6.8% 16.2%

PK-07CAMDEN 95.6% 3.0% 14.5%

KG-03CHARTERS 82.9% 17.5% 2.9%

KG-05CHARTERS 86.0% 0.0% 1.2%

KG-04CHARTERS 90.9% 2.1% 7.1%

KG-04CHARTERS 92.2% 0.0% 6.7%

KG-04CHARTERS 90.0% 0.0% 4.2%

KG-05CHARTERS 83.6% 3.0% 0.0%

PK-07CHARTERS 95.6% 0.9% 8.8%

PK-07ESSEX 86.8% 14.3% 8.3%

PK-07ESSEX 89.3% 21.4% 10.3%

PK-05ESSEX 85.8% 20.8% 3.8%

KG-05MERCER 90.4% 10.7% 12.3%

KG-05MERCER 94.3% 24.6% 16.0%

KG-05MERCER 91.5% 0.3% 9.5%

KG-05MERCER 92.1% 10.9% 13.1%

PK-05MIDDLESEX 90.5% 19.4% 11.3%

KG-05MIDDLESEX 87.3% 23.5% 9.4%

KG-04MIDDLESEX 88.6% 20.8% 7.6%

PK-04MONMOUTH 95.9% 13.4% 13.8%

01-05OCEAN 91.9% 23.4% 15.7%

01-05OCEAN 92.4% 19.3% 11.8%

PK-06PASSAIC 88.1% 28.3% 15.2%

PK-05PASSAIC 87.7% 27.4% 12.6%

PK-07PASSAIC 92.1% 8.2% 10.6%

PK-04SOMERSET 80.7% 33.6% 4.7%

KG-05UNION 89.0% 21.6% 12.2%

29-2520-070CLIFTON AVE GRADE SCHOOLSCHOOL PEER GROUP

GRADESPAN

CDS CODE

LEEDS AVENUE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLSOUTH MAIN STREET ELEMENTARY SCHOOLWASHINGTON AVENUE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLFRANCIS X. MCGRAW ELEMENTARY SCHOOLHARRY C. SHARP ELEMENTARY SCHOOLYORKSHIP ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

BELOVED COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOLBURCH CHARTER SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCECAMDEN'S PRIDE CHARTER SCHOOLINTERNATIONAL CHARTER SCHOOL OF TRENTONKNOWLEDGE A TO Z CHARTER SCHOOLPATERSON ARTS AND SCIENCE CHARTER SCHOOLUNIVERSITY HEIGHTS CHARTER SCHOOLFOREST STREET ELEMENTARY SCHOOLROSA PARKS/CENTRAL COMMUNITY SCHOOLSOUTH STREET ELEMENTARY SCHOOLFRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

GRANT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

GREGORY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. ELEMENTARY SCHOOLLINCOLN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

LIVINGSTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOLROBERT N. WILENTZ ELEMENTARY SCHOOLTHURGOOD MARSHALL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLCLIFTON AVE GRADE SCHOOL

OAK STREET ELEM SCHOOL

THOMAS JEFFERSON SCHOOL # 1

SCHOOL 15

SCHOOL 27

PINE GROVE MANOR SCHOOL

EMERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

01-4180-080

01-4180-095

01-4180-060

07-0680-230

07-0680-300

07-0680-360

80-6082-963

80-6022-990

80-6024-906

80-6810-940

80-6083-968

80-6096-982

80-8065-980

13-3880-080

13-3880-105

13-3570-640

21-5210-190

21-5210-200

21-5210-210

21-5210-401

23-3530-080

23-3530-090

23-4090-200

25-0100-100

29-2520-070

29-2520-084

31-3970-080

31-4010-190

31-4010-300

35-1610-140

39-4160-130

PLEASANTVILLE CITY

PLEASANTVILLE CITY

PLEASANTVILLE CITY

CAMDEN CITY

CAMDEN CITY

CAMDEN CITY

BELOVED COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOLBURCH CHARTER SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCECAMDEN'S PRIDE CHARTER SCHHOLINTERNATIONAL CS OF TRENTONKNOWLEDGE A TO Z CHARTER SCHOOLPATERSON ARTS AND SCIENCE CHARTER SCHOOLUNIVERSITY HEIGHTS CS

CITY OF ORANGE TWP

CITY OF ORANGE TWP

NEWARK CITY

TRENTON CITY

TRENTON CITY

TRENTON CITY

TRENTON CITY

NEW BRUNSWICK CITY

NEW BRUNSWICK CITY

PERTH AMBOY CITY

ASBURY PARK CITY

LAKEWOOD TWP

LAKEWOOD TWP

PASSAIC CITY

PATERSON CITY

PATERSON CITY

FRANKLIN TWP

PLAINFIELD CITY

44

CUMBERLAND



KG-05ATLANTIC 91.2% 6.4% 8.6%

PK-05CAMDEN 96.8% 3.5% 11.7%

PK-05CAPE MAY 90.2% 35.0% 13.2%

KG-03CHARTERS 82.9% 17.5% 2.9%

KG-04CHARTERS 90.9% 2.1% 7.1%

KG-04CHARTERS 92.2% 0.0% 6.7%

KG-04CHARTERS 90.0% 0.0% 4.2%

KG-05CHARTERS 95.9% 0.0% 7.9%

KG-03CHARTERS 92.3% 3.1% 3.9%

PK-07CHARTERS 95.6% 0.9% 8.8%

KG-05 91.2% 31.1% 13.7%

PK-07ESSEX 89.3% 21.4% 10.3%

PK-05ESSEX 85.8% 20.8% 3.8%

KG-05MERCER 94.3% 24.6% 16.0%

KG-05MERCER 89.8% 0.6% 0.0%

KG-05MERCER 93.8% 18.1% 12.1%

PK-05MIDDLESEX 90.5% 19.4% 11.3%

KG-05MIDDLESEX 87.3% 23.5% 9.4%

PK-05MIDDLESEX 88.4% 30.4% 9.5%

KG-04MIDDLESEX 88.6% 20.8% 7.6%

PK-04MONMOUTH 95.9% 13.4% 13.8%

01-05OCEAN 91.9% 23.4% 15.7%

01-05OCEAN 92.4% 19.3% 11.8%

PK-05PASSAIC 92.7% 31.6% 15.7%

PK-05PASSAIC 90.8% 24.9% 11.1%

PK-05PASSAIC 87.7% 27.4% 12.6%

PK-07PASSAIC 92.1% 8.2% 10.6%

KG-04PASSAIC 88.7% 28.6% 9.5%

PK-04SOMERSET 80.7% 33.6% 4.7%

KG-05UNION 89.0% 21.6% 12.2%

01-04UNION 82.7% 44.5% 7.0%

29-2520-084OAK STREET ELEM SCHOOLSCHOOL PEER GROUP

GRADESPAN

CDS CODE

SOUTH MAIN STREET ELEMENTARY SCHOOLFRANCIS X. MCGRAW ELEMENTARY SCHOOLGLENWOOD AVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLBELOVED COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOLCAMDEN'S PRIDE CHARTER SCHOOLINTERNATIONAL CHARTER SCHOOL OF TRENTONKNOWLEDGE A TO Z CHARTER SCHOOLNEW HORIZONS COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOLROSEVILLE COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOLUNIVERSITY HEIGHTS CHARTER SCHOOLGLORIA M SABATER ELEMENTARY SCHOOLROSA PARKS/CENTRAL COMMUNITY SCHOOLSOUTH STREET ELEMENTARY SCHOOLGRANT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL


MOTT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

LINCOLN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

LIVINGSTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOLROOSEVELT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLROBERT N. WILENTZ ELEMENTARY SCHOOLTHURGOOD MARSHALL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLCLIFTON AVE GRADE SCHOOL

OAK STREET ELEM SCHOOL

DANIEL F. RYAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL # 19EDWARD W KILPATRICK

SCHOOL 15

SCHOOL 27

SCHOOL 29

PINE GROVE MANOR SCHOOL

EMERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

HARRISON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

01-4180-095

07-0680-230

09-5790-060

80-6082-963

80-6024-906

80-6810-940

80-6083-968

80-7290-957

80-6058-939

80-8065-980

11-5390-075

13-3880-105

13-3570-640

21-5210-200

21-5210-230

21-5210-260

23-3530-080

23-3530-090

23-3530-125

23-4090-200

25-0100-100

29-2520-070

29-2520-084

31-3970-200

31-4010-047

31-4010-190

31-4010-300

31-4010-311

35-1610-140

39-4160-130

39-4540-020

PLEASANTVILLE CITY

CAMDEN CITY

WILDWOOD CITY

BELOVED COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOLCAMDEN'S PRIDE CHARTER SCHHOLINTERNATIONAL CS OF TRENTONKNOWLEDGE A TO Z CHARTER SCHOOLNEW HORIZONS COMM. CS

ROSEVILLE COMMUNITY CS

UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS CS

VINELAND CITY

CITY OF ORANGE TWP

NEWARK CITY

TRENTON CITY

TRENTON CITY

TRENTON CITY

NEW BRUNSWICK CITY

NEW BRUNSWICK CITY

NEW BRUNSWICK CITY

PERTH AMBOY CITY

ASBURY PARK CITY

LAKEWOOD TWP

LAKEWOOD TWP

PASSAIC CITY

PATERSON CITY

PATERSON CITY

PATERSON CITY

PATERSON CITY

FRANKLIN TWP

PLAINFIELD CITY

ROSELLE BORO

45

Exhibit B

46

2/17/16, 10:21 AMAllocation

Page 1 of 2https://njdoe.mtwgms.org/NJDOEGmsWeb/StaticPages/IDEAAllocation.aspx

Applicant: 29 2520 LAKEWOOD TOWNSHIP Application Sections Basic

Application: Cycle:

IDEA Consolidated - 00- Original Application Project Period: 7/1/2015 - 6/30/2016

Printer-FriendlyClick to Return to District Select

Click to Return to GMS Access/Select PageClick to Return to Menu List / Sign Out

Allocation Consortium BudgetDetail Budget

Summary

The application has been approved. No more updates will be saved for the application.

Basic Entitlement Allocation (Ages 3-21) Instructions

IDEA Part B Sec. 611 - It is estimated that the project/program is funded 100% with federal funds. These funds arecoded under CFDA Number 84.027AAllocation Calculation Base Amount

844432

Population

Public Enrollment Nonpublic Enrollment Total Population Population Rate Per Pupil Increase for PopulationAmount

5822 24996 30818 136.816851512769008544016967884216422

PovertyPublic Free/ReducedLunches

Nonpublic Free/ReducedLunches

Total Free/Reduced LunchCount Poverty Rate Per Pupil Increase for Poverty

Amount

5232 17377 22609 68.49680983504512916277622161548644

Total Current Year Funds

Basic Allocation (Ages 3-21) 6609498

ReAllocated Curr Year (+) 0

Release (-) 0

Total Current Year Funds 6609498

Prior Year(s) Funds

Carryover (+) 0

Overpayment (+) 0

ReAllocated Prior Year (+) 0

Total Prior Year(s) Funds

Cooperative/Consortia

Transfer In/Out 0

Adjusted Total 6609498

Nonpublic Proportionate Share CalculationTotal Students with Disabilities Total Nonpublic Students with Disabilities Basic Allocation (Ages 3- Nonpublic Proportionate

47

https://njdoe.mtwgms.org/NJDOEGmsWeb/StaticPages/IDEAAllocation.aspx#

https://njdoe.mtwgms.org/NJDOEGmsWeb/StaticPages/OrgSelect.aspx

https://njdoe.mtwgms.org/NJDOEGmsWeb/StaticPages/AplySelectByFiscalYear.aspx

https://njdoe.mtwgms.org/NJDOEGmsWeb/StaticPages/menulist.aspx

https://njdoe.mtwgms.org/NJDOEGmsWeb/logout.aspx

https://njdoe.mtwgms.org/NJDOEGmsWeb/StaticPages/IDEAAllocation.aspx

https://njdoe.mtwgms.org/NJDOEGmsWeb/StaticPages/ConsortiumParticipants.aspx

https://njdoe.mtwgms.org/NJDOEGmsWeb/Budget/IDEABdgtDtlSalary.aspx?ofc=100_100_TPAF.aspx

https://njdoe.mtwgms.org/NJDOEGmsWeb/Budget/IDEABudgetSummary.aspx

https://njdoe.mtwgms.org/NJDOEGMSWeb/HelpFiles/Allocation.pdf

2/17/16, 10:21 AMAllocation

Page 2 of 2https://njdoe.mtwgms.org/NJDOEGmsWeb/StaticPages/IDEAAllocation.aspx

(Ages 3-21) (Ages 3-21) 21) Share

4730 3577 6609498 4998346

Prior Year(s) Funds

Carryover (+) 0

Cooperative/Consortia

Transfer In/Out 0

Adjusted Total 4998346

PRD 2.0 user ID: PUBLIC

New Jersey Department of EducationSend Questions to: [email protected]

48

mailto:[email protected]

Exhibit C

49

LEONOR ALCANTARA, individually andlakewoodlaworg.ipage.com/documents/Motion for Summary...

Documents

Transcript of LEONOR ALCANTARA, individually andlakewoodlaworg.ipage.com/documents/Motion for Summary...