Legal Expertise vs. Competence: Knowledge Sharing Theories & Practices
-
Upload
viktor-doerfler -
Category
Law
-
view
486 -
download
1
Transcript of Legal Expertise vs. Competence: Knowledge Sharing Theories & Practices
Knowledge Sharing Theories & PracticesViktor Dörfler
Legal Expertise vs. Competence
Janders Dean Viktor 3
knowledge types
facts: experiencing the pole-vaulter’s jump (and measuring it)skills: social skills and crafts (and the rules of practice/behaviour)intuition: of the leader and of the creative problem solver (and the explanation – always with hindsight)
knowledge
skill
Practice(subsidiary)
Action(focal)
intuition
Explanation(subsidiary)
Hunch(focal)
facts
Measurement(subsidiary)
Event(focal)
Janders Dean Viktor 4
knowledge levels
1D3D but…
3D2D0D
novice expertadvanced master grandmastercontext-free second-hand
facts and rules
situational elements
organising by priorities
holisticsituation-induced
perspective
complete indwelling
Janders Dean Viktor 5
Nobel Laureates, top chefs, strategists
it is necessary to have a master to become oneboth following and abandoning the master’s way is wrong
but in this struggle the new master is forgedeven the genius needs itit is a highly asymmetric setup
several forms1. traditional master-disciple pairs2. wandering apprentice journeys3. mutual apprenticing4. hot spots: creative workshops
founded by one master
Janders Dean Viktor 6
masters & apprentices
there is no non-interfering coachingnot a kibitzer, not a chat companion,
not a private Jerry Springer Show
contextualises knowledgecreated by the alchemistendorsed by the guruas (s)he knows the broad contextactively participates in knowledge
sharing and provides assessment
helps realising your potentialeach coach brings out different things
Janders Dean Viktor 7
coaching for competence
“… the guy yelling, flailing, and running up and down at the side of the field trying to force the win from the team without ever hitting the ball.”
Janders Dean Viktor 8
sticky and leaky knowledge (sharing)
organisation
sensemaking
CoP
individuals
learning
up-to-yesterday second-hand facts are insufficientwe cannot know what knowledge we will need tomorrow
experience never failsit is what we do with our experience that often fails
Janders Dean Viktor 9
becoming competent
experiencingnon-verbalfocalknowledge
learning
darkness competence
verbalsubsidiaryknowledgecompetence = learned × experienced
actionable knowledgeheavily rooted in experiencerequires high level of expertiseintegrates various knowledge types
dynamic relationship betweenknowledgeknowercontext
competences
knowledge
knowercontext
It is not Noah Janders Dean Viktor 10
Viktor 11
www.strath.ac.uk/staff/dorflerviktordr
drviktordorfler
viktordorfler
viktordorfler
viktordorfler
viktordorfler
www.viktordorfler.com
www.doctuskbs.com
www.grandmasterproject.com
if you want to find me
Janders Dean