Lecture 9 Markets without market power: Perfect competition.
-
Upload
clementine-fletcher -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Lecture 9 Markets without market power: Perfect competition.
Lecture 9
Markets without market power:
Perfect competition
Market power
• Market power: Ability to control, or at least affect, the terms and conditions
of the exchanges in which one participates
• According to traditional neoclassical view:– Market power is considered to be bad: It can create
inefficiency– Competition is considered to be good: the image of a
self-regulating, harmonious, «free» competitive market is at the core of this view
Perfect competition
• Assumptions of the traditional neoclassical model which we had so far are still valid.
• PLUS some additional assumptions:– There are numerous small sellers and buyers, so small that no
individual seller or buyer can affect the market price.– Only one kind of good or service is traded. All units of this
good or service are identical, therefore, buyers don’t care from which seller they buy.
– Producers can freely enter or exit the industry. – Buyers and sellers have perfect information: They know where
the good is available, at what prices it is offered, and whether profits are being made.
Perfect competition• Further assumptions (cont’d):
– Firms have smooth curves with short-run diminishing returns (convexity and marginal thinking)
– Long-run minimum efficient scale of each producer is fairly small (relative to the demand for the output of the industry): constant returns to scale
– The market is assumed to operate in the following manner:• Everyone (hypothetically) gathers together.• Someone compiles all the offers to buy and to sell and based on
that he/she determines the market-clearing price (a hypothetical «auctioneer»)
• The price is announced, everyone who wants to exchange at this price does so.
Perfect competition• So,
– Every individual seller is price-taker– Each individual seller faces a horizontal (perfectly elastic)
demand curve: he/she can sell as many units as she wants, as long as he/she charges the market price
(BUT NOTE THAT market supply and market demand may have various other slopes!)
PE
Pri
ce (
$)
Quantity
Supply = Sum ofIndividual Firms'MC (Supply)Curves
Demand
Demand =MarginalRevenue
Marginal Cost =Individual Firm'sSupply Curve
PE
Pri
ce (
$)
(a) (b)
Quantity
100 10,000
A
Perfect competition
• Any examples?
– Agricultural products, for instance, wheat??
– Financial resale markets, for instance, for shares of certain companies
– Some labor markets
Profit maximization under perfect competition
• Competitive equilibrium:The equilibrium in a market where all buyers and sellers are price-
takers, unable individually to influence the price they pay or charge
• How much will each producer sell?
It depends on demand for the product and on the firm’s cost structure
PE
Pri
ce (
$)
Quantity
Supply = Sum ofIndividual Firms'MC (Supply)Curves
Demand
Demand =MarginalRevenue
Marginal Cost =Individual Firm'sSupply Curve
PE
Pri
ce (
$)
(a) (b)
Quantity
100 10,000
A
Profit maximization under perfect competition
How much economic profit will the profit-maximizing competitive firm make? Zero!!
– Zero economic profit (or normal profit):Revenues are just sufficient to compensate for the use of labor, materials, and
other physical inputs, financial and physical capital, and the time inputs—all evaluated at their opportunity costs
– Positive economic profit (or above-normal or supernormal profit)
The amount by which revenues exceed all economic costs (incl. opportunity costs)
BUT WHY ZERO?
Profit maximization under perfect competition
The profit-maximizing firm in case of perfect competition will make zero economic profits in the long-run, because of the free entry and exit of firms into the industry!
Quantity
P2
Q2 Q1
P1
Pri
ce (
$)
P2
P1
Pri
ce (
$)
Quantity
MC(a)
D
(b)
E1
MR2
MR1
S1 S2
A
Efficiency and equity in case of perfect competition
Perfectly competitive markets are efficient and lead to the best possible outcomes, if:
– There are no production and consumption externalities (neither positive nor negative)
– There are no public goods– All cost and effects are captured in this static model (i.e., there
are no effects spread out over time)– Society is not concerned about distribution (i.e., the current
distribution of ability to pay is considered acceptable)
THEN;
Market supply curve reflects social marginal cost of production, and market demand curve reflects social marginal benefit of consumption: allocative efficiency
Perfect competition and long-run efficiency
No competitive firm will operate on the downward-sloping or upward-sloping part of the LAC curve.
WHY?
Economiesof scale
Diseconomiesof scale
Competitive firms willproduce at low unit costs.
Lo
ng
-Ru
nA
vera
ge
Co
st (
$) Long-Run Average
Cost Curve
50 200
Quantity
Perfect competition and long-run efficiency
13.50 Price= MR
A
Total Cost = Total Revenue
MC
ATC
Pri
ce (
$)
9876543210
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Quantity of Hair Dryers
Consumer and producer surplus
ConsumerSurplus
PE
Supply
Demand
Pri
ce
Quantity
QE
Consumer surplus:
The excess (summed over all buyers in a market) of the amounts that buyers would be willing to pay for a good or service, over the amounts that they actually pay
Consumer and producer surplus
ProducerSurplus
PE
Supply
Demand
Pric
e
Quantity
QE
Producer surplus:
The excess (summed over all sellers in the market) of the amounts that sellers actually receive, over the amounts that would make them just willing to supply the good or service
Deadweight loss
Consumerandproducersurplus
Supply
Demand
Pri
ce
Quantity
QEQ1
Deadweightloss
Deadweight loss:
The loss in efficiency (measured in terms of consumer and producer surplus) that arises if market transactions take place at other than the competitive market equilibrium level
Policy analysis: Taxation
Quantity
D
S
ConsumerSurplus
TaxRevenue
ProducerSurplus
Splus-tax
t
Pri
ce
DeadweightLoss
QEQ1
Pbuyer
P
Policy analysis: Taxation
Q1
Quantity
S
ConsumerSurplus
TaxRevenue
ProducerSurplus
Pric
e
DeadweightLoss
QE
Pbuyer
Pseller
D
Q2
S
Tax with rather elastic demand
Policy analysis: Taxation
Quantity
D
S
ConsumerSurplus
TaxRevenue
ProducerSurplus
Splus-tax
t
Pri
ce
DeadweightLoss
QEQ1
Pbuyer
P
Q1
Quantity
S
ConsumerSurplus
TaxRevenue
ProducerSurplus
Pric
e
DeadweightLoss
QE
Pbuyer
Pseller
D
Q2
S
Policy analysis: Rent control
Quantity of Apartments Offered for Rent
Rentceiling
Demand
Supply
ConsumerSurplus
Transfer
ProducerSurplusP
rice
(R
en
t p
er
Mo
nth
)
Pceiling
PE
DeadweightLoss
QEQ
Rent control with moderately elastic supply
Policy analysis: Rent control
Supply
Quantity of Apartments Offered for Rent
Rentceiling
Demand
ConsumerSurplus
Transfer
ProducerSurplus
Pri
ce (
Re
nt
pe
r M
on
th)
Pceiling
PE
Q
Rent control with perfectly inelastic supply