lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2...
Transcript of lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2...
![Page 1: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Effect Modification and Non-Linear Associations: Regression Based Approaches
Lecture 9
![Page 2: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Lecture Set Overview
n Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome/ predictor associations for different levels of a potential effect modifier via the use of interaction terms in regression
n Conceptualizing non-linearity as a type of effect-modification and showing another way to model it in a regression context (without categorizing the continuous predictor)
![Page 3: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Section A
Regression With Interaction Terms
![Page 4: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Learning Objectives
n Describe the “interaction term” approach to estimating separate outcome/predictor associations for different levels of an effect modifier, and for testing for effect modification
![Page 5: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Assessing EM By Presenting Stratified Results
n Example 1: Suicide Outcomes and Sexual Identity1
1 Pinney T, Millman S. Asian/Pacific Islander Adolescent Sexual Orientation and Suicide Risk in Guam. American Journal of Public Health (2004) . Vol 4, No 7. pps 1204-1206.
![Page 6: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Assessing EM By Presenting Stratified Results
n Example 1: Suicide Outcomes and Sexual Identity
![Page 7: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Assessing EM By Presenting Stratified Results
n Example 1: Suicide Outcomes and Sexual Identity
Table: Relationship Between Attempted Suicide and Sexual Orientation,
Presented Separately by Sex.
Odds Ratio of Suicide Attempt1
Unadjusted Adjusted2
Males 5.01 (2.13, 11.78) 5.06 (1.65, 15.55)
Females 2.65 (1.17, 6.00) 2.17 (0.84, 5.60)
1 Compares the odds of having had at least one suicide attempt for
youth how identify as homosexual compared to youth who do not identify as homosexual
2 Adjusted for ethnicity, relationship abuse, alcohol abuse and markers of depression
![Page 8: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Assessing EM By Presenting Stratified Results
n Example 22: Coffee Drinking and Mortality (multivariate: adjusted for body-mass index; race or ethnic group; level of education; alcohol consumption; the number of cigarettes smoked per day, use or nonuse of pipes or cigars, and time of smoking cessation (<1 year, 1 to <5 years, 5 to <10 years, or ≥10 years before baseline); health status; diabetes (yes vs. no); marital status; physical activity; total energy intake; consumption of fruits, vegetables, red meat, white meat, and saturated fat; use or nonuse of vitamin supplements; and use or nonuse of postmenopausal hormone therapy)
2 Freedman N, et al. Association of Coffee Drinking with Total and Cause-Specific Mortality. New England Journal of Medicine (2012). 366 (20) 1891-1904.
8
![Page 9: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Assessing EM By Presenting Stratified Results
n Example 22: Coffee Drinking and Mortality
9
![Page 10: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Another Approach
n Sometimes, however, the researcher may want to estimate separate associations for one predictor only, and pool the estimates for the other predictors across all groups. For example:
- Estimate the sex-specific associations between wages and years of education, after adjusting for other factors (across both males and females)
- Estimate age specific associations between mortality and race in dialysis patients, after adjusting for other factors (using data from all age groups combined)
n This can be done by including an “interaction term” in a multiple regression model
10
![Page 11: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Assessing EM With an Interaction Term
n Example 1: Hourly Wages and Years of Education
Table 1: Unadjusted and Adjusted Linear Regression Slopes:Years of Education(outcome is Hourly Wages, n= 534)Index Slope (95% CI) Estimate is Adjusted for: A 0.75 (0.59. 0.91) (unadjusted)B 0.75 (0.59. 0.91) SexC 0.76 (0.60. 0.92) Sex, Union MembershipD 0.47 (0.29, 0.65) Sex, Union Membership, Job TypeE 0.49 (0.31, 0.67) Sex, Union Membership, Job Type, Sector, Marital Status
![Page 12: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
n Results from Model C, plotted separately for males and females
12
Assessing EM With an Interaction Term
05
1015
Hou
rly W
ages
(US
$)
0 5 10 15 20Years of Education
Males Females
Adjusted for sex, and union membership
Plotted Separately By SexRegression Estimates of Hourly Wages for Years of Education
![Page 13: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
n The slope of each sex-specific regression line is the same: this is the slope of years of education from the MLR with years of education and sex (0.76), and other adjustment variables
n The difference between the estimated wages for males and females is the same at each value of years of education: this is the difference in hourly wages between males and females adjusting for years of education (and other adjustment variables): in this example, this difference is $1.89
n Similar graphics could be shown for the other models
13
Assessing EM With an Interaction Term
![Page 14: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
n Once sex has been adjusted for, the wages/years of education relationship is the same in each level of sex
n Once years of education has been adjusted for, the wages/sex relationship is same at each value of years of education
n Suppose, however, we are interested in investigating whether the relationship between wages and years of education is modified by sex (after adjustment for union membership)
14
Assessing EM With an Interaction Term
![Page 15: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
n We could stratify the sample by sex, and estimate two different regressions of wages on years of education after adjusting for union membership
n Results:
Slope of Years of Education (95% CI) Males 0.71 (0.50, 0.91) Females 0.84 (0.62, 1.06)
15
Assessing EM With an Interaction Term
![Page 16: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Assessing EM With an Interaction Term
n Approach 2: add an interaction term between years of education and sex to the model that includes the other adjustment variables
n Here’s how it works: - Add an interaction term to the model which already include
years of education ( x1 ) and sex ( x2 ) as predictors, as well as the other predictors
n This interaction term, x3 , can be created by taking the product of x1 and x2 ; x3 =x1*x2
![Page 17: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
n New model with interaction term
Where x1= years of education, x2 =sex (1 for females), and x3= interaction term (x1*x2)
n What is value of x3 for:
- Males? - Females?
17
xs) and slopesother (ˆˆˆˆˆ 3322110 ++++= xxxy ββββ
Assessing EM With an Interaction Term
![Page 18: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
n Results
n Slope of years of education Males (x2=0, x3=0) Females (x2=1, x3=x1*1)
18
xs) and slopesother (14.069.370.040.0ˆ 321 ++−++= xxxy
Assessing EM With an Interaction Term
xs) and slopesother (70.040.0ˆ 1 ++= xy
xs) and slopesother ()1*(14.069.370.040.0ˆ 11 ++−++= xxyxs) and slopesother (14.070.069.340.0ˆ 11 +++−+= xxy
xs) and slopesother ()14.070.0(69.340.0ˆ 1 +++−+= xy
![Page 19: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
n Results from model with interaction term plotted separately for males and females
19
Assessing EM With an Interaction Term
05
1015
Hou
rly W
ages
(US
$)
0 5 10 15 20Years of Education
Males Females
Adjusted for sex and union membership, with an interaction term for sex and years of education
Plotted Separately By SexRegression Estimates of Hourly Wages for Years of Education
![Page 20: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
n Results
n Testing formally if slope of x3 is statistically significant is called “a test of interaction”
Ho: β3=0 HA:β3≠0
- In this example, the p-value is 0.38: there is not a statistically significant interaction between years of education and sex after adjusting for union membership status
20
xs) and slopesother (14.069.370.040.0ˆ 321 ++−++= xxxy
Assessing EM With an Interaction Term
![Page 21: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
n Example: Mortality in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (Mayo clinic data)
n Randomized trial: patients randomized to receive DPCA or placebo
n Results: (unadjusted) HR (DPCA to placebo) 1.06 (0.75, 1.50)
n Question: Is effect of drug modified by age of patient?
21
Assessing EM With an Interaction Term
![Page 22: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
n Age of patient: categorized into quartiles
Quartile 1: < 42 years Quartile 2: [42,50) Quartile 3: [50, 57) Quartile 4: >= 57 years
n To investigate whether age modifies the effect of the drug, we will need to fit a Cox model that includes drug, the age quartile indicators, and interaction terms between drug and each of the age quartile indicators
22
Assessing EM With an Interaction Term
![Page 23: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
n Model Results
n For each of the age quartiles:
- Age quartile 1: - Age quartile 2: - Age quartile 3: - Age quartile 4:
23
Assessing EM With an Interaction Term
)x*-0.25(x)x*0.10(x)x*0.28(x 1.22x0.58x0.02x
0.07x- [t]ˆ ) hazardln(
413121
432
1o
++
+++
++= λ
1o 0.07x- [t]ˆ ) hazardln( += λ
)1*(28.002.00.07x- [t]ˆ ) hazardln( 11o x+++= λ)1*(10.058.00.07x- [t]ˆ ) hazardln( 11o x+++= λ
)1*(25.022.10.07x- [t]ˆ ) hazardln( 11o x−+++= λ
![Page 24: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
n For each of the age quartiles:
- Age quartile 1:
- Age quartile 2:
- Age quartile 3:
- Age quartile 4:
24
Assessing EM With an Interaction Term
1o 0.07x- [t]ˆ ) hazardln( += λ
1o 0.28)x(-0.07 02.0[t]ˆ ) hazardln( +++= λ
1o .10)x0.07- (58.0[t]ˆ ) hazardln( +++= λ
1o )25.0(-0.07 22.1[t]ˆ ) hazardln( x−+++= λ
![Page 25: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
n HRs comparing drug to placebo for each of the age quartiles:
- Age quartile 1: 0.94 (0.38, 2.33) - Age quartile 2: 1.24 (0.59, 2.69) - Age quartile 3: 1.03 (0.54, 1.97) - Age quartile 4: 0.73 (0.40, 1.34)
25
Assessing EM With an Interaction Term
![Page 26: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
n Testing for an interaction between age and treatment
- Resulting p-value: 0.74
26
Assessing EM With an Interaction Term
)x*-0.25(x)x*0.10(x)x*0.28(x 1.22x0.58x0.02x
0.07x- [t]ˆ ) hazardln(
413121
432
1o
++
+++
++= λ
![Page 27: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
n Conclusion: the effect of the drug is not modified by age (although the results looked promising for the oldest age quartile, this was not significant after accounting for sampling variability)
27
Assessing EM With an Interaction Term
![Page 28: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
n The inclusion of interaction terms in a multiple regression model (linear, logistic, or Cox) allows for the assessment of effect modification with (or without) adjustment for potentially multiple other predictors
28
Assessing EM With an Interaction Term
![Page 29: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Section B
Examples of Interaction Terms in Published Research
![Page 30: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
Learning Objectives
n Exposure to several examples of the use of interaction terms in published analyses
![Page 31: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
Linear Regression With Interaction Term
n Example 1: Depression and PTSD1
1 Chemtob C, et al. Maternal Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Depression in Pediatric Primary Care Association With Child Maltreatment and Frequency of Child Exposure to Traumatic Events. JAMA Pediatrics (2013) .
![Page 32: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
Linear Regression With Interaction Term
n Example 1: Depression and PTSD
![Page 33: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
Linear Regression With Interaction Term
n Example 1: Depression and PTSD
![Page 34: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
Linear Regression With Interaction Term
n Example 1: Depression and PTSD
![Page 35: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
Linear Regression With Interaction Term
n Example 1: Depression and PTSD: Interaction model for outcome of psychological abuse score for child
where
321 02.026.015.0ˆˆ xxxy o −+++= β
313
21
* and scale, PTSD ,scale depression
score, abuse calpsychologi mean ˆ
xxxxx
y
=
==
=
![Page 36: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
Linear Regression With Interaction Term
n Let’s look at several examples of the relationship between psychological abuse score and depression for specific values of PTSD PTSD= 3:
PTSD = 4:
PTSD=10:
321 02.026.015.0ˆˆ xxxy o −+++= β
)*3(02.0)3(26.015.0ˆˆ 11 xxy o −+++= β
)*4(02.0)3(26.015.0ˆˆ 11 xxy o −+++= β
)*10(02.0)3(26.015.0ˆˆ 11 xxy o −+++= β
![Page 37: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
Linear Regression With Interaction Term
n Overall Interpretation The association between psychological abuse scores and depression decreases with increasing PTSD scores
![Page 38: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
Linear Regression With Interaction Term
n Example 1: Depression and PTSD
![Page 39: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
Linear Regression With Interaction Term
n Example 1: Depression and PTSD
![Page 40: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
Cox Regression With Interaction Term
n Example 2: Second Smoke and Fiber Consumption2
2 Clark M, et al. Dietary fiber intake modifies the association between secondhand smoke exposure and coronary heart disease mortality among Chinese non-smokers in Singapore. Nutrition (2013) Vol 29: 1304–1309
![Page 41: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41
Cox Regression With Interaction Term
n Example 2: Second Smoke and Fiber Consumption2
2 Clark M, et al. Dietary fiber intake modifies the association between secondhand smoke exposure and coronary heart disease mortality among Chinese non-smokers in Singapore. Nutrition (2013) Vol 29: 1304–1309
![Page 42: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
42
Cox Regression With Interaction Term
n Example 3: Association of Race and Age With Survival Among Patients Undergoing Dialysis3
3 Kucircka K, et al. Association of Race and Age With Survival Among Patients Undergoing Dialysis. Journal of the American Medical Association. (2011) 306;6.
![Page 43: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
43
Cox Regression With Interaction Term
n Example 3: Association of Race and Age With Survival Among Patients Undergoing Dialysis3
3 Kucircka K, et al. Association of Race and Age With Survival Among Patients Undergoing Dialysis. Journal of the American Medical Association. (2011) 306;6.
![Page 44: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
44
Cox Regression With Interaction Term
n Methods Section Excerpts
![Page 45: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
45
Cox Regression With Interaction Term
n Methods Section Excerpts
Seven Age Groups 18-30 years 31-40 years 41-50 years 51-60 years 61-70 years 71-80 years > 80 years
![Page 46: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
46
Cox Regression With Interaction Term
n Model used by authors
betas) and sx'other ( )*(ˆ)*(ˆ)*(ˆ)*(ˆ)*(ˆ)*(ˆ
ˆˆˆˆˆˆ
ˆ[t]ˆ death) of hazardln(
7113611251114110319218
776655443322
11o
++++++
++++++
++=
xxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxx
x
ββββββ
ββββββ
βλ
![Page 47: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
47
Cox Regression With Interaction Term
n Close-up of Table 2
![Page 48: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
48
Mentioning Investigation of Interaction
n Many articles will mention that the researchers investigated interaction, even if no interactions were found or reported
![Page 49: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Mentioning Investigation of Effect Modification
n From abstract4
4Jagsi R, et al. Gender Differences in the Salaries of Physician Researchers. Journal of the American Medical Association (2012); 307(22); 2410-2417.
49
![Page 50: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Mentioning Investigation of Effect Modification
n “We explored pairwise interactions between gender and the other characteristics”
50
![Page 51: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Section C
Non-linear Relationships with Continuous Predictors in Regression: the Spline Approach
![Page 52: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
52
Learning Objectives
n Get a brief overview of another method for handling non-linearity in a regression setting, that allows for a piecewise approaching to estimating the relationship between an outcome and a continuous predictor
![Page 53: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
810
1214
1618
Arm
Circ
umfe
renc
e (c
m)
0 5 10 15 20Weight (kg)
1,000 Children, 0-60 Months OldArm Circumference and Weight
Example 1
n Scatterplot: Arm Circumference and Weight, 1,000 Nepalese Children 0-60 months
53
![Page 54: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Example 1
n Scatterplot : Linear or not?
54
810
1214
1618
Arm
Circ
umfe
renc
e (c
m)
0 5 10 15 20Weight (kg)
1,000 Children, 0-60 Months OldArm Circumference and Weight
![Page 55: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Example 1: Investigating Nonlinearity
n Option 1: categorize weight into 4 groups
55
810
1214
1618
Arm
Circ
umfe
renc
e (c
m)
0 5 10 15 20Weight (kg)
1,000 Children, 0-60 Months OldArm Circumference and Weight
![Page 56: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Example 1: Investigating Nonlinearity
n Option 2: fit a curve ( )
56
810
1214
1618
Arm
Circ
umfe
renc
e (c
m)
0 5 10 15 20Weight (kg)
1,000 Children, 0-60 Months OldArm Circumference and Weight
21211
ˆˆˆˆ xxy o βββ ++=
![Page 57: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Example 1: Investigating Nonlinearity
n Option 3: More than 1 Line (spline)
57
810
1214
1618
Arm
Circ
umfe
renc
e (c
m)
0 5 10 15 20Weight (kg)
1,000 Children, 0-60 Months OldArm Circumference and Weight
![Page 58: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Example 1: Investigating Nonlinearity
n Linear spline approach - Allows for nonlinearity to be investigated via fitting lines with
differing slopes across the predictor range - Researcher can pick points where line slope can change - Slope changes can be estimated at multiple points
n Effect modification analogy - Non-linearity occurs when an outcome/predictor relationship is
modified by the predictor - Ex: relationship between AC and weight depends on weight
58
![Page 59: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Example 1: Investigating Nonlinearity
n Option 3: More than 1 Line (spline)
59
810
1214
1618
Arm
Circ
umfe
renc
e (c
m)
0 5 10 15 20Weight (kg)
1,000 Children, 0-60 Months OldArm Circumference and Weight
![Page 60: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Example 1: Investigating Nonlinearity
n Estimated association with a spline at 5 kg
where and
60
+−−++= )5(86.017.125.6ˆ 11 xxy weight1 =x
⎩⎨⎧
≥−
<=− +
5x if )5(5x if 0
)5(11
11 xx
![Page 61: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Example 1: Investigating Nonlinearity
n Why does this work? - When x1 <5
- When x1≥5
61
117.125.6ˆ xy +=
1
11
11
11
-0.86)x(1.17 10.75 -0.86x1.17x)(-0.86)(-56.25
)(-0.86)(-5-0.86x1.17x 6.25 )5(86.017.125.6ˆ
++=
+++=
+++=
−−++= xxy
![Page 62: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Example 1: Investigating Nonlinearity
n Option 3: More than 1 Line (spline)
62
810
1214
1618
Arm
Circ
umfe
renc
e (c
m)
0 5 10 15 20Weight (kg)
1,000 Children, 0-60 Months OldArm Circumference and Weight
![Page 63: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Example 1: Investigating Nonlinearity
n Testing for change in slope at 5 kg
63
+−−++= )5(86.017.125.6ˆ 11 xxy
![Page 64: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Example 2: Investigating Nonlinearity
n NHANEs Data: Obesity and age: lowess plot of ln(odds) of obesity versus age
64
-3-2
-10
1
ln(O
dds
of B
eing
Obe
se)
20 40 60 80Age (years)
bandwidth = .8
Logit transformed smoothLowess smoother
![Page 65: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Example 2: Investigating Nonlinearity
n NHANEs Data: Obesity and age: lowess plot of ln(odds) of obesity versus age Fit a model that allows for changes in slope at 40 and 60, plus adjustment for HDL levels and sex where
65
5544
131211
ˆ ˆ
)60(ˆ)40(ˆˆˆobesity) of oddsln(
xx
xxxo
ββ
ββββ
+
+−+−++= ++
F)(1sex x (mg/dL), HDL,(years) age 541 === xx
![Page 66: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Example 2: Investigating Nonlinearity
n Adjusted ln(odds ratios) for age age ln(OR) for one year difference in age < 40 40-60 >= 60
66
5544
131211
ˆ ˆ
)60(ˆ)40(ˆˆˆobesity) of oddsln(
xx
xxxo
ββ
ββββ
+
+−+−++= ++
321ˆˆˆ βββ ++
21ˆˆ ββ +
1̂β
![Page 67: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Example 2: Investigating Nonlinearity
n Results
67
Table 1: Logistic Regression Results for Predictors of ObesityOdds Ratio (95% CI)
Predictor Unadjusted Adjusted1
Age (years)< 40 years 1.04 (1.03, 1.05) 1.04 (1.02, 1.05)40-‐60 years 0.97 (0.95, 0.99) 1.00 (0.99, 1.01)>= 60 years 0.96 (0.94, 0.98) 0.99 (0.95, 1.01)
1 adjusted for HDL levels and sex
![Page 68: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Example 3: Investigating Nonlinearity
n Soda consumption and physical education classes1
1 Chen H, and Wang Y. Influence of School Beverage Environment on the Association of Beverage Consumption With Physical Education Participation Among US Adolescents. American Journal of Public Health (2013). 103 (11)
68
![Page 69: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Example 3: Investigating Nonlinearity
n Soda consumption and physical education classes
69
![Page 70: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
Example 3: Investigating Nonlinearity
n Soda consumption and physical education classes
70
![Page 71: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
Example 3: Investigating Nonlinearity
n Soda consumption and physical education classes
71
![Page 72: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
Example 3: Investigating Nonlinearity
n Soda consumption and physical education classes
n Model 4: Where:
x1 = number days of moderate to vigorous activity x2 = number of days participating in physical education class
72
xs and slopesother )3(61.018.026.0ˆˆ 221 +−+−+−+= +xxxy oβ
⎩⎨⎧
≥−
<=− +
3x if )3(3x if 0
)3(21
22 xx
![Page 73: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
Example 3: Investigating Nonlinearity
n Model 4: When x2<3:
73
xs and slopesother )3(61.018.026.0ˆˆ 221 +−+−+−+= +xxxy oβ
xs and slopesother 18.026.0ˆˆ 21 +−+−+= xxy oβ
![Page 74: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
Example 3: Investigating Nonlinearity
n Model 4: When x2≥3:
74
xs and slopesother )3(61.018.026.0ˆˆ 221 +−+−+−+= +xxxy oβ
xs and slopesother )3(61.018.026.0ˆˆ 221 +−+−+−+= xxxy oβ
xs and slopesother )61.0(361.018.026.0ˆˆ 221 +−+−+−+= xxxy oβ
xs and slopesother )61.018.0(26.0)61.0(3ˆˆ 21 ++−+−+−= xxy oβ
![Page 75: lecture 9 - Amazon Web Serviceslecturecontent.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/15167.pdf · Lecture 9 . 2 Lecture Set Overview ! Testing for effect modification and estimating different outcome](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070821/5f22bc3396365045d851b4c3/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
75
Summary
n Linear splines offer an alternative to categorizing a continuous predictor when investigating and/or handling potential non-linearity in an outcome/exposures association estimated with regression (simple or multiple)
n This approach is useful when the “per unit” change in a measure of association (mean difference, odds ratio, hazard ratio) is of scientific interest, but the association is not necessarily linear on the regression scale