Lecture 7
-
Upload
komma-naveen-kumar -
Category
Education
-
view
1.597 -
download
0
Transcript of Lecture 7
![Page 1: Lecture 7](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022072000/55d526f7bb61eb50398b45ac/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Legality
of
Object
![Page 2: Lecture 7](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022072000/55d526f7bb61eb50398b45ac/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
LEGALITY OF OBJECT
According to Section 23 of the Act, the object of an agreement is unlawful in the following cases:
1. If it is forbidden by law:
[Case: Srinivas v. Raja Ram Mohan]
A loan granted to the guardian of a minor to enable him to celebrate the minor’s
marriage
![Page 3: Lecture 7](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022072000/55d526f7bb61eb50398b45ac/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
• It is in contravention of the Child Marriage Restraint Act and is illegal and cannot be recovered
2. If it is of such a nature that if permitted, it would defeat the provisions of any law
![Page 4: Lecture 7](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022072000/55d526f7bb61eb50398b45ac/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
[Alexander v. Rayson]• A let a flat to B at a rent of £1200 a year. • With a view to reduce the municipal tax A
made two agreements with B. One, by which the rent was stated to be £450 only and the other, by which B agreed to pay £750 for services in connection with
the flat.• Held : A could not recover £750 since the
agreement was made to defraud the municipal authority and thus void
![Page 5: Lecture 7](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022072000/55d526f7bb61eb50398b45ac/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
3. If it is fraudulent
Example: A, B and C enter into an agreement for the division among them of gains acquired or to be acquired, by them by fraud. The agreement is void as its object is unlawful
![Page 6: Lecture 7](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022072000/55d526f7bb61eb50398b45ac/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
4. If it involves or implies injury to the person or property of another
[Case: Ram Saroop v. Bansi]• A borrowed Rs. 100 from B. He (A)
executed a bond promising to work for B
without pay for 2 years and in case of default agreed to pay interest at a very
exorbitant rate and the principal amount at once.
• Held : The contract was void
![Page 7: Lecture 7](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022072000/55d526f7bb61eb50398b45ac/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
5. If the Court Regards it as Immoral
[Baivijli v. Hamda Sagar]
M advanced money to R , a married woman to enable her to obtain a divorce from her husband. M agreed to marry her as soon as she could obtain a divorce.
Held: M could not recover advanced money because the object of agreement was immoral.
![Page 8: Lecture 7](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022072000/55d526f7bb61eb50398b45ac/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
6. If it is opposed to public policy
(i) Trading with enemy
(ii) Agreements for stifling prosecution
(iii) Contracts in the nature champerty and maintenance
![Page 9: Lecture 7](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022072000/55d526f7bb61eb50398b45ac/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
(iv) Agreements for the sale of public offices and titles
[Case: Saminathan v. Muthusami ]
A promises to pay a sum to B in order to induce him to retire so as to provide room for A’s appointment to the public office held by B
Held: The agreement is void
![Page 10: Lecture 7](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022072000/55d526f7bb61eb50398b45ac/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
(v) Agreements in restraint of parental rights
[Giddu Narayanish v. Mrs. Annie Besant]• A father having two minor sons agreed to
transfer their guardianship in favour of
Mrs. Annie Besant and also agreed not to revoke the transfer.
• Subsequently, he filed a suit for recovery of the boys and a declaration that he was the rightful guardian,
![Page 11: Lecture 7](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022072000/55d526f7bb61eb50398b45ac/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Held: The Court held that he had the right to revoke his authority and get back the children.
(vi) Marriage brokerage
[Venkatakrishna v. Venkatachalam ]
A sum of money was agreed to be paid to the father in consideration of his giving his daughter in marriage.
Held : Such a promise amounted to a marriage brokerage contract and was void
![Page 12: Lecture 7](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022072000/55d526f7bb61eb50398b45ac/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
(vii) Agreement in restraint of marriage
(viii) Agreements in restraint of legal proceedings
(ix) Agreements in restraint of trade
![Page 13: Lecture 7](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022072000/55d526f7bb61eb50398b45ac/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
[Oakes & Co. v. Jackson ]
J, an employee of a company, agreed not to employ himself in a similar concern within a distance of 800 miles from Madras after leaving the company’s service.
Held : The agreement was void
![Page 14: Lecture 7](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022072000/55d526f7bb61eb50398b45ac/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Exceptions: [Cases in which restraint of trade is valid in India]
1. Sale of goodwill
[Goldsoll v. Goldmand]• S, a seller of imitation jewellery, sells his
business to B and promises not to carry on business in imitation jewellery and real jewellery.
![Page 15: Lecture 7](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022072000/55d526f7bb61eb50398b45ac/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Held : The restraint with regard to imitation jewellery was valid but not regarding real jewellery
2. Partners’ agreement:
3. Service agreements
(i) Any other engagement during his employment [ valid]
(ii) A similar engagement after the termination of his services [void]
![Page 16: Lecture 7](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022072000/55d526f7bb61eb50398b45ac/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
• A agreed to become assistant for 3 years to B who was a doctor practising at Chennai.
• It was agreed that during the term of the agreement A was not to practise on his own account in Chennai.
• After one year, A started his own practice.
![Page 17: Lecture 7](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022072000/55d526f7bb61eb50398b45ac/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Held : The agreement was valid and A could be restrained by an injunction from doing so.
Example• A bank appoints an officer subject to the
condition that after ceasing to be in service he would not join the service of any other bank in India for a period of 5 years
![Page 18: Lecture 7](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022072000/55d526f7bb61eb50398b45ac/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Held: The bank shall not be in a position to enforce such condition.
(x) Agreement restricting personal liberty
(xi) Agreement tending to create interest opposed to duty
![Page 19: Lecture 7](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022072000/55d526f7bb61eb50398b45ac/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
THANK YOU
11