Lecture 6 EBM 2012 (1)

download Lecture 6 EBM 2012 (1)

of 30

Transcript of Lecture 6 EBM 2012 (1)

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 6 EBM 2012 (1)

    1/30

    MPP3

    Lecture 6

    Dr A Kostzrewski

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 6 EBM 2012 (1)

    2/30

    What is evidence?

    The hierarchy of evidence

    What is evidence-based medicine?

    Role of NICE, SIGN, PRODIGY, NSF,

    Cochrane Library

    Implications of national guidance for

    practice

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 6 EBM 2012 (1)

    3/30

    What is evidence?

    A patient tells you that the atenolol really helps toreduce her angina attacks.

    A group of specialists from the local area havedecided by consensus that beta-blockers should beused as first-line treatment for angina.

    A RCT of 10,000 people shows lower incidence ofMIs and of premature death in those treated withbeta-blockers compared with amlodipine.

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 6 EBM 2012 (1)

    4/30

    The Hierarchy of evidence for

    effectivenessI Systematic reviews of RCTs, or RCTs

    II Cohort studies

    III Case-control studies

    IV Cross-sectional studies, case reports,

    case series

    V Consensus/expert opinion

    www.nice.org.uk www.cebm.net

    http://www.nice.org.uk/http://www.cebm.net/http://www.cebm.net/http://www.nice.org.uk/
  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 6 EBM 2012 (1)

    5/30

    The Hierarchy of evidence for

    effectiveness Systematic reviews of RCTs, or RCTs

    Cohort studies

    Case-control studies

    Cross-sectional studies, case reports,

    case series

    Consensus/expert opinion

    Increasing bias

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 6 EBM 2012 (1)

    6/30

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 6 EBM 2012 (1)

    7/30

    Systematic reviews

    Synthesis of studies

    Available studies are systematically gathered

    and reviewed according to pre-defined methods i.e. methods are explicit and reproducible

    Meta-analysis (pooling of data) undertaken if

    same outcomes used across studies

    Example Cochrane library of systematic

    reviews (http://www.cochrane.org/index.htm)

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 6 EBM 2012 (1)

    8/30

    Systematic Review

    Study 1 Study 2 Study 3 Study 4

    Combined results

    Meta-analysis

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 6 EBM 2012 (1)

    9/30

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 6 EBM 2012 (1)

    10/30

    Randomised Controlled Trial

    Allocate intervention and comparator(s)randomly to selected population

    Follow-up and compare groups in terms ofpre-defined outcomes

    Best design for evaluating interventions

    Disadvantages - expensive, time-

    consuming, ?generalisability

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 6 EBM 2012 (1)

    11/30

    RCT

    Control group

    (different treatment

    or none)

    Treatment group Follow-up

    Follow-up

    Compare

    groups

    Selected

    population

    Random

    assignment

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 6 EBM 2012 (1)

    12/30

    Cohort

    Comparison of groups, selected on basis ofpresence or absence of risk factor (e.g.exposure or intervention)

    Follow-up from exposure (event orintervention) to outcome (predefined)

    Best design for prognostic studies

    Potential selection bias, loss to follow-up HRT example different results for RCT vs

    cohort studies

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 6 EBM 2012 (1)

    13/30

    Cohort

    Comparison group

    e.g. women who are

    not incontinent

    Group of interest e.g. women

    who are incontinent

    Follow over time

    Follow over time

    Compare

    outcomes (pre-

    defined)

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 6 EBM 2012 (1)

    14/30

    Case-control

    Compare a group that has an outcome with matchedcontrols

    Controls differ only in exposure to possible causal agent

    Retrospective i.e. starts with outcome, and looks back to identify

    whether there is an association between exposure andoutcome by identifying non-cases

    Useful when examining risk factors for disease (rareconditions)

    Potential recall bias

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 6 EBM 2012 (1)

    15/30

    Case-control

    Take histories

    Take histories

    Compare

    histories

    Group of interest (with

    outcome)

    Comparison group

    (no outcome,

    matched with

    group of interest)

    Draw

    conclusion

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 6 EBM 2012 (1)

    16/30

    Cross-sectional

    Survey

    Examine exposure and outcome in a

    population at single time period

    Useful in epidemiology and public health

    e.g. prevalence

    Can identify associations but not explain them

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 6 EBM 2012 (1)

    17/30

    Cross-sectional

    Population surveyed

    at one point in time

    Population

    Population with

    exposure and

    outcome

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 6 EBM 2012 (1)

    18/30

    Case-series

    Based on medical histories

    No comparison group

    New treatments or tests described in a studywith no control group also fall into this category

    Descriptive only can suggest trends but do not

    provide explanations or show associations

    between cause and effect

    Open to selection bias

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 6 EBM 2012 (1)

    19/30

    Case-series

    Patients Records

    Report

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 6 EBM 2012 (1)

    20/30

    The Hierarchy of evidence for

    effectiveness Systematic reviews of RCTs, or RCTs

    Cohort studies

    Case-control studies

    Cross-sectional studies, case reports,

    case series

    Consensus/expert opinion

    Increasing bias

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 6 EBM 2012 (1)

    21/30

    Answer our question of what is

    evidence.A patient tells you that the atenolol really helps to

    reduce her angina attacks.

    A group of specialists from the local area has decided

    by consensus that beta-blockers should be used as

    first-line treatment for angina.

    A RCT of 10,000 people shows lower incidence of

    MIs and of premature death in those treated with

    beta-blockers compared with amlodipine.

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 6 EBM 2012 (1)

    22/30

    What is evidence-based medicine?

    Various definitions

    Involves judicious use of evidence in

    managing patients

    Hierarchy of evidence is used to grade

    recommendations in guidelines (strength

    of evidence)

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 6 EBM 2012 (1)

    23/30

    National Institute for Health and Clinical

    Excellence (NICE)

    Four programmes of work

    Clinical guidelines

    Technology appraisals

    Single technologies e.g. drugs or groups of similar drugs e.g.

    Herceptin, proton pump inhibitors

    Interventional procedures

    Public health guidance e.g. workplace smoking

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 6 EBM 2012 (1)

    24/30

    NICE and evidence based

    practice NICE guidance is based on best available

    evidence

    e.g. for a question about effectiveness, if there issystematic review that considers the question noneed to go further

    also includes consideration of cost-effectiveness

    Best available clinical/cost evidence +clinical interpretation/ input = NICEguidance

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 6 EBM 2012 (1)

    25/30

    Scottish Intercollegiate

    Guidelines Network (SIGN)

    NICE guidance applies to both England

    and Wales

    SIGN covers Scotland

    Similar methodology

    www.sign.ac.uk

    http://www.sign.ac.uk/http://www.sign.ac.uk/
  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 6 EBM 2012 (1)

    26/30

    PRODIGY(CKS NHS Clinical Knowledge Summaries NHS Evidence)

    A source of clinical knowledge for the

    NHS about the common conditions

    managed in primary and first contact care

    Assimilates guidance from other sources

    e.g. NICE, other best available evidence

    http://www.prodigy.clarity.co.uk

    http://www.prodigy.clarity.co.uk/http://www.prodigy.clarity.co.uk/
  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 6 EBM 2012 (1)

    27/30

    National Service Frameworks

    Department of Health

    Set standards for service delivery

    Examples coronary heart disease, older

    people, long-term conditions

    Relationship between NICE and NSFs

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 6 EBM 2012 (1)

    28/30

    Implications of national guidance

    for practice

    Follow as best practice

    NICE Technology Appraisals

    The NHS must demonstrate funding is

    available

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 6 EBM 2012 (1)

    29/30

    ..implications for pharmacy practice

    Know what the current national guidance

    is (and why)

    ..beware, things change new evidence

    Ask yourselves how old the guidance is

    Where also would you go?

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 6 EBM 2012 (1)

    30/30

    Conclusions What is evidence?

    The hierarchy of evidence

    What is evidence-based medicine?

    Role of NICE, SIGN, PRODIGY, NSF,Cochrane Library

    Implications of national guidance for

    practice

    http://www.rpharms.com/your-day-to-day-practice/essential-websites-for-pharmacists.asp

    http://www.rpharms.com/your-day-to-day-practice/essential-websites-for-pharmacists.asphttp://www.rpharms.com/your-day-to-day-practice/essential-websites-for-pharmacists.asphttp://www.rpharms.com/your-day-to-day-practice/essential-websites-for-pharmacists.asphttp://www.rpharms.com/your-day-to-day-practice/essential-websites-for-pharmacists.asphttp://www.rpharms.com/your-day-to-day-practice/essential-websites-for-pharmacists.asphttp://www.rpharms.com/your-day-to-day-practice/essential-websites-for-pharmacists.asphttp://www.rpharms.com/your-day-to-day-practice/essential-websites-for-pharmacists.asphttp://www.rpharms.com/your-day-to-day-practice/essential-websites-for-pharmacists.asphttp://www.rpharms.com/your-day-to-day-practice/essential-websites-for-pharmacists.asphttp://www.rpharms.com/your-day-to-day-practice/essential-websites-for-pharmacists.asphttp://www.rpharms.com/your-day-to-day-practice/essential-websites-for-pharmacists.asphttp://www.rpharms.com/your-day-to-day-practice/essential-websites-for-pharmacists.asphttp://www.rpharms.com/your-day-to-day-practice/essential-websites-for-pharmacists.asphttp://www.rpharms.com/your-day-to-day-practice/essential-websites-for-pharmacists.asphttp://www.rpharms.com/your-day-to-day-practice/essential-websites-for-pharmacists.asphttp://www.rpharms.com/your-day-to-day-practice/essential-websites-for-pharmacists.asp